Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-prt4h Total loading time: 0.383 Render date: 2021-10-23T06:35:06.489Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

9 - Marcion and the ‘canon’

from Part III - Community Traditions and Self-Definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2008

Margaret M. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Frances M. Young
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Marcion is one of the most intriguing yet elusive figures in early Christian history. It is proof of his prominence that, among the diverse forms of Christianity that flourished in the second century, his was the most frequently and forcefully attacked by anti-heretical writers, and was apparently perceived as the most dangerous. Marcion has likewise interested modern scholars, not only because of the peculiarities of his teachings but also because of his possible influence on one of the most important developments in the early church, the formation of the Christian Bible. In that connection, Marcion has commanded attention on two major topics: the church’s appropriation of the scriptures of Judaism (which it came to call the ‘Old Testament’), and the emergence of a canon of specifically Christian scriptures (a ‘New Testament’).

It is impossible in short space to do justice to the many difficulties that beset the study of Marcion and his influence. It has not yet become entirely clear either what Marcion taught or why he taught it. Some of his salient convictions are well known, but it remains uncertain how they arose, cohered or intersected the convictions of others. The old question whether Marcion should be regarded as a biblical theologian or as a Gnostic (or philosophical) teacher has not been answered, and cannot be answered in those terms. But, by situating Marcion within second-century Christianity and the issues that preoccupied it, we can go far towards making his activity intelligible and evaluating his role.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aalders, G. J. D.Tertullian’s quotations from St Luke’, Mnemosyne 5 (1937)Google Scholar
Aland, B.Marcion/Marcioniten’, Theologische Realenzyklopädie, Krause, G. and Müller, G. (eds.) (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1976–) 22 (1992)Google Scholar
Aland, B.Marcion: Versuch einer neuen Interpretation’, Zeitschrift für Theologie 70 (1973)Google Scholar
Balas, D. L.Marcion revisited: a “post-Harnack” perspective’, in Texts and testaments, March, W. E. (ed.) (San Antonio, TX: Trinity University Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Barton, J.Marcion revisited’, in The canon debate, McDonald, L. M. and Sanders, J. A. (eds.) (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002)Google Scholar
Barton, J. Holy writings, sacred text: the canon in early Christianity (Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 1998).
Bellinzoni, A. J. The sayings of Jesus in the writings of Justin Martyr, NovTSup 17 (1967).
Bianchi, U.Marcion, théologien biblique ou docteur gnostique?Vigiliae Christianae 21 (1967)Google Scholar
Bienert, W.Marcion und der Antijudaismus’, in Marcion und seine kirchengeschichtliche Wirkung, May, G. and Greschat, K. (eds.), TU 150 (2002)Google Scholar
Blackman, E. C. Marcion and his influence (London: SPCK, 1948).
Bludau, A. Die Schriftfälschungen der Häretiker: ein Beitrag zur Textkritik der Bibel, NTAbh 11 (1925).Google Scholar
Bovon, F.The canonical structure of gospel and apostle’, in The canon debate, McDonald, L.M. and Sanders, J. A. (eds.) (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002)Google Scholar
Campenhausen, H. von. The formation of the Christian Bible, Baker, J. A. (trans.) (Philadephia: Fortress, 1972).
Clabeaux, J. J. A lost edition of the letters of Paul: a reassessment of the text of the Pauline corpus attested by Marcion, Catholic Biblical quarterly monograph series (Washington, DC: The Catholic Biblical Association of America) 21 (1989).Google Scholar
Cosgrove, C. H.Justin Martyr and the emerging Christian canon: observations on the purpose and destination of the Dialogue with Trypho’, Vigiliae Christianae 36 (1982)Google Scholar
Dahl, N. A.The origin of the earliest prologues to the Pauline letters’, Semeia 12 (1978)Google Scholar
Dahl, N. A.The particularity of the Pauline epistles as a problem in the ancient church’, in Neotestamentica et Patristica: eine Freundesgabe, Herrn Professor Dr. Oscar Cullmann, zu seinem 60. Geburtstag überreicht, NovTSup 6 (1962); repr. in Dahl, N. A. , Studies in Ephesians: introductory questions, text- and edition-critical issues, interpretation of texts and themes, Hellholm, D., Blomkvist, V. and Fornberg, T. (eds.), WUNT 131 (2000).Google Scholar
Dassmann, E. Der Stachel im Fleisch: Paulus in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Irenäus (Munster:Aschendorff, 1979).
Drijvers, H. J.W.Marcionism in Syria: principles, problems, polemics’, SecCent 6 (1987–8)Google Scholar
Dungan, D. L.Reactionary trends in the gospel producing activity of the early Church:Marcion, Tatian, Mark’, in L’évangile selon Marc: tradition et rédaction, Sabbe, M. (ed.), BETL 34 (1974)Google Scholar
Ehrman, B. The orthodox corruption of scripture: the effect of early christological controversies on the text of the New Testament (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Finegan, J.The original form of the Pauline collection’, Harvard theological review 49 (1956)Google Scholar
Frede, H.–J.Die Ordnung der Paulusbriefe und der Platz des Kolosserbriefes im Corpus Paulinum’, Vetus Latina: die Reste der altlateinischen Bibel, 26 vols., Beuron, E., Fischer, B., Frede, H. J., Sabatier, P., Thiele, W. et al. (eds.) (Freiburg: Herder, 1949–). 24 (1969).Google Scholar
Gager, J. G.Marcion and philosophy’, Vigiliae Christianae 26 (1972)Google Scholar
Gamble, H. Y. Books and readers in the early church: a history of early Christian texts (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995).
Graham, W. A.Scripture’, The encyclopedia of religion, 16 vols., Eliade, M. (ed.) (New York: Macmillan, 1987), vol. XIII, 133–45.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M.Marcion and the critical method’, in From Jesus to Paul: studies in honor of Francis Wright Beare, Richardson, P. and Hurd, J. C. (eds.) (Toronto:Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. Gnosticism and early Christianity, 2nd ed. (New York: Harper, 1966).
Grant, R. M. The earliest lives of Jesus (New York: Harper & Row, 1961).
Gregory, A. The reception of Luke and Acts in the period before Irenaeus: looking for Luke in the second century, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) 2/169 (2003).Google Scholar
Hahneman, G. M. The Muratorian fragment and the development of the canon, OTM(1992).
Harnack, A. von. Marcion: das Evangelium vom fremden Gott, ein Monographie zur Geschichte der Grundlegung der katholischen Kirche (Leipzig: Hinrichs, 1921; 2nd ed. corr. and expanded 1924, repr. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1960, 1985); English translation: Marcion: the gospel of the alien God, Steeley, J. and Bierma, L. (trans.) (Durham, N.C.: Labyrinth Press, 1990).
Heckel, T. K. Vom Evangelium des Markus zum viergestaltigen Evangelium, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) 120 (1999).Google Scholar
Higgins, A. J. B.The Latin text of Luke in Marcion and Tertullian’, Vigiliae Christianae 2 (1951)Google Scholar
Hoffmann, R. J. Marcion, On the restitution of Christianity: an essay on the development of radical Paulinist theology in the second century, AAR Academy series 46 (1984).
Jonas, H. The Gnostic religion: the message of the alien god and the beginnings of Christianity, 3rd ed. (Boston: Beacon Press, 2001).
Kerschensteiner, J. Der altsyrische Paulustext, CCSO 315 (1970).Google Scholar
Kinzig, W.Kaine diatheke: the title of the New Testament in the second and third centuries’, Journal of theological studies 45 (1994)Google Scholar
Knox, J. Marcion and the New Testament: an essay in the early history of the canon (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1942).
Lewis, A. S. Catalogue of the Syriac MSS in the convent of St Catharine on Mt Sinai, Studia Sinaitica 1 (London: Clay, 1894).
Lindemann, A. Paulus im ältesten Christentum: das Bild des Apostels und die Rezeption der paulinischen Theologie in der frühchristlichen Literatur bis Marcion, BHT 58 (1979).
Lindemann, A. Paulus, Apostel und Lehrer der Kirche: Studien zu Paulus und zum frühen Paulusverständnis (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999).
MacDonald, D. R. The legend and the apostle: the battle for Paul in story and canon (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1983).
May, G.Der Streit zwischen Petrus und Paulus in Antiochien bei Markion’, in Von Wittenberg nach Memphis: Festschrift für R. Schwarz, Homolka, W. and Ziegelmeier, O. (eds.) (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989)Google Scholar
May, G.Marcion in contemporary views: results and open questions’, SecCent 6 (1987–8)Google Scholar
May, G. Schöpfung aus dem Nichts: die Entstehung der Lehre von der creatio ex nihilo, AKG 48 (1978); English translation: Creatio ex nihilo: the doctrine of ‘creation out of nothing’ in early Christian thought, Worrall, A. S. (trans.) (Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 2004
May, G., and Greschat, K. (eds.). Marcion und seine kirchengeschichtliche Wirkung, TU 150 (2002).
McDonald, L. M. and Sanders, J. A. (eds.) The canon debate (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002).
Merkel, H. Die Pluralität der Evangelien als theologisches und exegetisches Problem in der Alten Kirche (Berne: Lang, 1978).
Merkel, H. Die Widersprüche zwischen den Evangelien: ihre polemische und apologetische Behandlung in der alten Kirche bis zu Augustin, WUNT 13 (1971).
Metzger, B. M. The canon of the New Testament: its origin, development and significance (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).
Nestle, E. Einführung in das griechische Neue Testament, 3rd ed. (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1909).
Norelli, E.Marcion: ein christlicher Philosoph oder ein Christ gegen die Philosophie?’, in Marcion und seine kirchengeschichtliche Wirkung, May, G. and Greschat, K. (eds.), TU 150 (2002)Google Scholar
Pagels, E. H. The gnostic gospels (New York: Random House, 1979).
Parker, D. The living text of the gospels (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Petersen, W. L. Tatian’s Diatessaron: its creation, dissemination, significance and history in scholarship, VCSup 25 (1994).
Regul, J. Die antimarcionitischen Evangelienprologe, Aus der Geschichte der lateinischen Bibel 6 (Freiburg: Herder, 1969).
Rensberger, D.As the apostle teaches: the development of the use of Paul’s letters in second century Christianity’ (Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, 1981).
Rudolph, K. Gnosis: the nature and history of Gnosticism, McL.Wilson, R. (ed.) (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987).
Schmid, U.Marcions Evangelium und die neutestamentlichen Evangelien: Ruckfragen zur Geschichte und Kanonisierung der Evangelienüberlieferung’, in Marcion und seine kirchengeschichtliche Wirkung, May, G. and Greschat, K. (eds.), TU 150 (2002)Google Scholar
Simon, M. Verus Israel: a study of the relations between Christians and Jews in the Roman empire (ad 135–425), McKeating, H. (trans.), Littman library of Jewish civilization (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).
Skeat, T. C.The oldest manuscript of the four gospels’, New Testament studies 43 (1997), repr. in The collected biblical writings of T. C. Skeat, Elliott, J. K. (ed.), NovTSup 113 (2004)Google Scholar
Stanton, G. N.The fourfold gospel’, New Testament studies 43 (1997)Google Scholar
Stendahl, K.The Apocalypse of John and the epistles of Paul in the Muratorian fragment’, in Current issues in New Testament interpretation, Klassen, W. and Snyder, G. S. (eds.) (New York: Harper & Row, 1962)Google Scholar
Stuhlhofer, F. Der Gebrauch der Bibel von Jesus bis Euseb: eine statistische Untersuchung zur Kanongeschichte (Wuppertal: Brockhaus, 1988).
Sundberg, A. C.Canon Muratori: a fourth century list’, Harvard theological review 66 (1973)Google Scholar
Sundberg, A. C.Toward a revised history of the New Testament canon’, StEv 4; TU 102 (1968)Google Scholar
West, H. P.A primitive version of Luke in the composition of Matthew’, New Testament studies 14 (1967)Google Scholar
Williams, D. S.On Tertullian’s text of Luke’, SecCent 8 (1991)Google Scholar
Williams, D. S.Reconsidering Marcion’s gospel’, Journal of biblical literature 108 (1989)Google Scholar
Williams, M. A. Rethinking ‘Gnosticism’: an argument for dismantling a dubious category (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).
Wilshire, L. E.Was canonical Luke written in the second century? A continuing discussion’, New Testament studies 20 (1974)Google Scholar
Wilson, R. S. Marcion: a study of a second century heretic (London: Clarke, 1932).
Wilson, S. G.Marcion and the Jews’, in Anti-Judaism in early Christianity, 2 vols., Wilson, S.G. (ed.) (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1986), vol. II Google Scholar
Woltmann, J.Der geschichtliche Hintergrund der Lehre Markions vom “Fremden Gott”’, in Wegzeichen: Festgabe zum 60. Geburtstag von Prof. Dr. Hermengild M. Biedermann, Suttner, E. C. and Patock, C. (eds.) (Würzburg: Augustinus, 1971)Google Scholar
Zahn, Th.Das Neue Testament Theodors von Mopsuestia und der ursprüngliche Kanon der Syrer’, Neue kirchliche Zeitschrift 11 (1900)Google Scholar
Zahn, Th. Geschichte des neutestamentliche Kanons, 2 vols. (Erlangen: Deichert, 1888–92).
3
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×