Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:25:04.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Properties of Nominal Expressions

from Part III - Spanish Morphosyntax and Meaning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2018

Kimberly L. Geeslin
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Get access

Summary

Expression and omission of subject personal pronouns has been studied extensively in various perspectives and using terminology ranging from “pro-drop” in generative linguistics to “variable subject expression” in functional approaches. Traditional grammar considers null subjects the norm and refers to “contrast” and “emphasis” to account for pronoun expression. Genuinely contrastive uses of subject pronouns are nevertheless rare and the choice between expressing the subject only by means of bound person marking (canto ‘[I] sing’) or by both independent and bound person marking (yo canto ‘I sing’) depends on various factors. While there is extensive evidence that grammatical person and coreferentiality with previous subjects affect subject expression in all varieties of Spanish, frequency of subject expression varies across dialects, typically being highest in Caribbean and lowest in Mexican and Peninsular varieties. Priming of previously used sequences and entrenchment of frequently repeated verb-subject combinations have also been shown to account for variable subject expression in spoken discourse. The current chapter sets out by defining the scope of variation and situating Spanish in a language-typological perspective. Next, an overview is provided of the factors that have been found to affect the phenomenon. Finally, we summarize the findings and discuss directions for future research. 
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abney, S. P. (1987). The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Stavrou, M., and Haegeman, L. (2007). Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ambadiang, T. (1999). La flexión nominal. Género y número. In Bosque, I. and Demonte, V. (eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa, pp. 48434913.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. B. (1993). Topics in the Syntax of Nominal Structure across Languages (Doctoral dissertation). CUNY.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. B. (2001). Focusing the “Right” Way in Romance Determiner Phrases. Probus, 13 (1), 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2012). On NPs and Clauses. In Grewendorf, G. and Zimmermann, T. E. (eds.), Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 179242.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (ed.). (1996). El sustantivo sin determinación. La ausencia de determinante en la lengua española. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical–Functional Syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Casielles, E. (2004). The Syntax–Information Structure Interface. Evidence from Spanish and English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (1998). Reference to Kinds across Languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6, 339405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (1994). On the Evidence for Partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In Cinque, G., Koster, J., Pollock, J.-Y., Rizzi, L., and Zanuttini, R. (eds.), Paths Towards Universal Grammar. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 85110.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. (2010). The Syntax of Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (2014). The Semantic Classification of Adjectives. A View from Syntax. Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 25 (1), 130.Google Scholar
Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. (2010). The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. In Heine, B. and Narrog, H. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5165.Google Scholar
Contreras, H. (1996). Sobre la distribución de los sintagmas nominales no predicativos sin determinante. In Bosque, 1996: 141168.Google Scholar
Demonte, V. (1999). A Minimal Account of Spanish Adjective Position and Interpretation. In Franco, J., Landa, A., and Martín, J. (eds.), Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 4575.Google Scholar
Durrlemann, S. (2015). Nominal Architecture in Jamaican Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 30 (2) (2015), 265306.Google Scholar
Eguren, L. (1989). Algunos datos del español en favor de la hipótesis de la frase determinante. Revista Argentina de Lingüística, 5 (1/2), 163209.Google Scholar
Eguren, L. (2010). Contrastive Focus and Nominal Ellipsis in Spanish. Lingua, 120 (2), 435457.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. T. (2009). Bare Nominals in Catalan and Spanish. Their Structure and Meaning. Lingua, 120, 9841009.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2010). A Syntactic Account of Affix Rivalry in Spanish Nominalisations. In Alexiadou, A. and Rathert, M. (eds.), The Syntax of Nominalizations across Languages and Frameworks. Berlin: De Gruyter, pp. 6790.Google Scholar
Fábregas, A. (2016) Las nominalizaciones. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Gil, J. M. (2016) A Relational Account of the Spanish Noun Phrase. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36 (1), 2251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra and Longobardi, Giuseppe (1991). The Syntax of Noun Phrases. Configuration, Parameters and Empty Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, J. (1991). Extended Projection (MS). Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. (2003). La semántica de los indefinidos. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Rexach, J. and Mallén, E. (2002). Toward a Unified Analysis of Prenominal Adjectives. In Lee, James F., Geeslin, Kimberly L., and Clements, J. Clancy (eds.), Structure, Meaning, and Acquisition in Spanish. Papers from the 4th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 178192.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1991). The Exponence of Gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 22 (1), 27.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (1990). English Word Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (2004). Are Determiners Heads? Functions of Language, 11 (1), 742.Google Scholar
Ihsane, T. (2008). The Layered DP: Form and Meaning of French Indefinites. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laca, B. (1996). Acerca de la semántica de los plurales escuetos del español. In Bosque, 1996: pp. 241268.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, C. (2005). French Adjective Ordering: Perspectives on DP-Internal Movement Types. Lingua, 115 (5), 645689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M. (2013). Information Structure and the Distribution of Spanish Bare Plurals. In Kabatek, J. and Wall, A. (eds.), Bare Noun Phrases in Romance: Theory and (Empirical) Data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 121155.Google Scholar
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and Proper Names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25 (4), 609665.Google Scholar
Martí, L. (2008). The Semantics of Plural Indefinite Noun Phrases in Spanish and Portuguese. Natural Language Semantics, 16 (1), 137.Google Scholar
McNally, L. (2004). Bare Plurals in Spanish are Interpreted as Properties. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 115133.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Foote, R., and Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender Agreement in Adult Second Language Learners and Spanish Heritage Speakers: The Effects of Age and Context of Acquisition. Language Learning, 58, 503553. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9922.2008.00449.xGoogle Scholar
Picallo, M. C. (1991). Nominals and Nominalization in Catalan. Probus, 3, 279316.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. C. (2008). Gender and Number in Romance. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 4766.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A na T., Munn, Alan, Schmitt, Cristina, and DeIrish, Michelle. (2004a). Learning Definite Determiners: Genericity and Definiteness in English and Spanish. In Brugos, Alejna, Micciulla, Linnea, and Smith, Christine E. (eds.), Online Proceedings Supplement of the 28th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla. Available at http://www.bu.edu/bucld/files/2011/05/28-perez-leroux.pdf (accessed February 2, 2018).Google Scholar
Rivero, M. L. (1991). Las construcciones de relativo. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2009). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis (Doctoral dissertation). Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Saab, A. (2010) (Im)possible Deletions in the Spanish DP. Iberia. An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2 (2), 4583.Google Scholar
Sánchez, L. (1996). Syntactic Structure in Nominals: A Comparative Study of Spanish and Southern Quechua (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Socarrás, G. (2011). First Language Acquisition in Spanish: A Minimalist Approach to Nominal Agreement. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, A. (1984). The Possessor that Ran Away from Home. The Linguistic Review, 3, 89102.Google Scholar
Ticio, M. E. (2005). NP-Ellipsis in Spanish. In Eddington, D. (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Colloquium. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla, pp. 128141.Google Scholar
Ticio, M. E. (2010). Locality Domains in the Spanish DPs. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1987). On Empty Categories in Nominals (MS). University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Valois, Daniel. (1991). The Internal Syntax of DP (Doctoral dissertation). UCLA.Google Scholar
van Eynde, F. (2006). NP-Internal Agreement and the Structure of the Noun Phrase. Journal of Linguistics, 42, 139186.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J. and Zubizarreta, M. L. (1992). The Definite Determiner and the Inalienable Constructions in French and in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 23, 595652.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×