Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- 6 Spirited Psyche Creates Artifacts: Semiotic Dynamics of Experience in the Shaping of Objects, Agency, and Intentional Worlds
- 7 Making Social Objects: The Theory of Social Representation
- 8 Beyond the Distinction between Tool and Sign: Objects and Artifacts in Human Activity
- 9 The Sociocultural Study of Creative Action
- 10 Symbolic Resources and Imagination in the Dynamics of Life
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
9 - The Sociocultural Study of Creative Action
from Part II - Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 June 2018
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Editors’ Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Methodological Issues
- Part II Action, Objects, Artifacts, and Meaning
- 6 Spirited Psyche Creates Artifacts: Semiotic Dynamics of Experience in the Shaping of Objects, Agency, and Intentional Worlds
- 7 Making Social Objects: The Theory of Social Representation
- 8 Beyond the Distinction between Tool and Sign: Objects and Artifacts in Human Activity
- 9 The Sociocultural Study of Creative Action
- 10 Symbolic Resources and Imagination in the Dynamics of Life
- Part III The Agent Rises a Reflective Self: Education and Development
- Part IV Institutional Artifacts for Value
- Part V Aesthetic and Religious Experiences
- Part VI Practices and Artifacts for Imagining Identity
- Part VII Experiences Make the Person
- General Conclusion
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology , pp. 163 - 177Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357–377.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (ed. by Holquist, M., trans. by Emerson, C. & Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Imitation: A chapter in the natural history of consciousness. Mind, 3(9), 26–55.Google Scholar
Barrett, F. (1999). Knowledge creating as dialogical accomplishment: A constructivist perspective. In Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (Eds.), Social Creativity (vol. 1, pp. 133–151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Barron, F. (1999). All creation is a collaboration. In Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (Eds.), Social Creativity (vol. I, pp. 49–59). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (2008). Art Worlds: Updated and Expended. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 325–339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Bono, E. (1970). Lateral Thinking: Creativity Step-by-Step. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dubina, I. N., Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2012). Creativity economy and a crisis of the economy? Coevolution of knowledge, innovation, and creativity, and of the knowledge economy and knowledge society. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. S. (1992). Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010a). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(1), 79–93.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2010b). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Culture & Psychology, 16(2), 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). What can be done with an egg? Creativity, material objects and the theory of affordances. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 192–208.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013a). Rewriting the language of creativity: The five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2013b). Creativity and folk art: A study of creative action in traditional craft. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(2), 140–154.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015a). On units of analysis and creativity theory: Towards a “molecular” perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(3), 311–330.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015b). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P. (2015c). From individual to co-agency. In Gruber, C. W., Clark, M. G., Klempe, S. H., & Valsiner, J., J. (Eds.), Constraints of Agency: Explorations of Theory in Everyday Life (pp. 245–266). London: Springer.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., Gillespie, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). Rethinking Creativity: Perspectives from Cultural Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., Lubart, T., Bonnardel, N., Botella, M., de Biaisi, M.-P., Desainte-Catherine, M., Georgsdottir, A., Guillou, K., Kurtag, G., Mouchiroud, C., Storme, M., Wojtczuk, A., & Zenasni, F. (2013). Creativity as action: Findings from five creative domains. Frontiers in Educational Psychology, 4, 1–14.Google Scholar
Gruber, H. (2005). The creative person as a whole: The evolving systems approach to the study of creative work. In Gruber, E. & Bödeker, K. (Eds.), Creativity, Psychology and the History of Science (pp. 35–104). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Gruber, C. W., Clark, M. G., Klempe, S. H., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). Constraints of Agency: Explorations of Theory in Everyday Life. London: Springer.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, Intelligence and Their Educational Implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. & Hallam, E. (2007). Creativity and cultural improvisation: An introduction. In Hallam, E. & Ingold, T. (Eds.), Creativity and Cultural Improvisation (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
John-Steiner, V. (1992). Creative lives, creative tensions. Creativity Research Journal, 5(1), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in Context: Representations, Community and Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2010). Are creative students really welcome in the classrooms? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” students’ personality among Polish teachers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1233–1237.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (Eds.). (2005). Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Lamm, H. & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3(4), 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I. (2000). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.Google Scholar
Mace, M. A., & Ward, T. (2002). Modeling the creative process: A grounded theory analysis of creativity in the domain of art making. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 179–192.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and Social Representations: The Dynamics of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J., & Gillespie, A. (2010). A neo-Meadian approach to human agency: Relating the social and the psychological in the ontogenesis of perspective-coordinating persons. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 252–272.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1964). Selected Writings: George Herbert Mead (ed. by Reck, A. J.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montuori, A. & Purser, R. (1997). Le dimensioni sociali della creatività [Social creativity: The challenge of complexity. Pluriverso, 1(2), 78–88.Google Scholar
Moran, S. & John-Steiner, V. (2003). Creativity in the making: Vygotsky's contemporary contribution to the dialectic of development and creativity. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (Eds.), Creativity and Development (pp. 61–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social Representations: Explorations in Social Psychology (ed. by Duveen, G.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Paulus, P. & Nijstad, B. (Eds.). (2003). Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1977). Semiotics and Significs (ed. by Hardwick, C.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1924). The Foundations of Science (trans. by Halstead, G. B.). New York: Science Press.Google Scholar
Potts, J. D., Hartley, J., Banks, J. A., Burgess, J. E., Cobcroft, R. S., Cunningham, S. D., & Montgomery, L. (2008). Consumer co-creation and situated creativity. Industry and Innovation, 15(5), 459–474.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1971). The process of Janusian thinking in creativity. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24, 195–205.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2015). A commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (1995). Creativity as mediated action: A comparison of improvisional performance and product creativity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 2(3), 172–191.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. (1990). Cultural psychology – What is it? In Stigler, J., Shweder, R., & Herdt, G. (Eds.), Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A transhistorical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(6), 1119–1133.Google Scholar
Taillard, M., Voyer, B., Glăveanu, V. P., & Gritzali, A. (2014). Value creation and consumption: When consumer creativity generates value in online forums. Advances in Consumer Research, 42, 381–385.Google Scholar
Van Dijck, J. (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media Culture Society, 31, 41–58.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (2001). Creative cognition, conceptual combination, and the creative writing of Stephen R. Donaldson. American Psychologist, 56(4), 350–354.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T. & Gillespie, A. (2015). Imagination in Human and Cultural Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zittoun, T., Gillespie, A., Cornish, F., & Psaltis, C. (2007). The metaphor of the triangle in theories of human development. Human Development, 50(4), pp. 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Further Reading
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (ed. by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- 8
- Cited by