Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-rbzxz Total loading time: 1.04 Render date: 2022-05-19T21:08:44.481Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Chapter 18 - A Pragmatist Approach to Business Ethics Research

from Part III - A Researcher in the Spotlight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Patricia H. Werhane
DePaul University, Chicago
R. Edward Freeman
University of Virginia
Sergiy Dmytriyev
University of Virginia
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Astley, W. G. (1985) “Administrative Science as Socially Constructed Truth,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 30: 497513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagozzi, Richard P., and Edwards, Jeffrey R.. “A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research.” Organizational Research Methods 1.1 (1998): 4587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldridge, David C., Floyd, Steven W., and Markóczy, Lívia. “Are Managers from Mars and Academicians from Venus? Toward an Understanding of the Relationship between Academic Quality and Practical Relevance.” Strategic Management Journal 25.11 (2004): 10631074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. (2010). The Pragmatic Turn, (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1984) Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. (1995) “Darwin’s Dangerous Idea.” The Sciences 35.3: 3440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1908/1998) “Does Reality Possess Practical Character?The Essential John Dewey Volume 1, Hickman, L. and Alexander, T. (eds.), (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1930/1998) “What I BelieveThe Essential John Dewey Volume 1, Hickman, L. and Alexander, T. (eds.), (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
Dewey, John. Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi, 1998.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. The Later Works of John Dewey, Volume 7, (2008) 1925–1953: 1932, Ethics. Vol. 7. SIU Press.Google Scholar
Durand, R., and Vaara, E. (2009) “Causation, Counterfactuals, and Competitive Advantage,” Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 12451264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., and De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (2004) “Book Review Essay: The Relevance of Richard Rorty to Management Research,” Academy of Management Review, 29(1): 127144.Google Scholar
Hitt, Michael A., Gimeno, Javier, and Hoskisson, Robert E.. (1998).”Current and Future Research Methods in Strategic Management.” Organizational Research Methods 1.1: 644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, Anne Sigismund. (2000) “1999 Presidential Address: Changes in Organizational Knowledge Production.” Academy of Management Review 25.2: 288293.Google Scholar
James, W. (1902/1985) The Varieties of Religious Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1907/2014), Pragmatism, (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khurana, Rakesh. (2007). “From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession.” (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Krueger, J. W. (2009). “Knowing Through the Body: the Daodejing and Dewey.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 36:1. 3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larwood, Laurie, Gattiker, Urs E., (1999) eds. Impact Analysis: How Research Can Enter Application and Make a Difference. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Lawler, Edward E., ed. Doing Research that is Useful for Theory and Practice. Lexington Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Kelemen, M. and Rumens, N., (2013) (eds.) American Pragmatism and Organization. (Surrey, England: Gower)Google Scholar
Tomasello, M., Melis, A.P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E. and Herrman, E. (2012) “Two Key Steps in the Evolution of Human Cooperation: The Interdependence Hypothesis,” Current Anthropology, 53(6): 673692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, J. T. (1993) “Strategic Management and Determinism: Sustaining the Conversation,” Journal of Management Studies 30(1): 173191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, J. D., and Walsh, J.P. (2003) “Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowday, Richard T. (1997). “Celebrating 40 Years of the Academy of Management Journal.” Academy of Management Journal 40.6: 14001414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Kevin R., and Saal, Frank E., eds. (2013) Psychology in Organizations: Integrating Science and Practice. Psychology Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Pappas, G. F. (Ed.). (2008). John Dewey’s Ethics: Democracy as Experience. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1878/1965) “How to Make Our Ideas Clear,” Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 5) (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Purnell, L. S. and Freeman, R. E. (2012) “Stakeholder Theory, Fact/Value Dichotomy, and the Normative Core: How Wall Street Stops the Ethics Conversation, Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1): 109116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. (2002). The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
Quine, W.V. (1951) “Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of Empiricism,” The Philosophical Review, 60(1): 2043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991) “Feminism and Pragmatism: The Tanner Lectures on Human Values,” (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan).
Rorty, R. (1999) Philosophy and Social Hope, (New York: Penguin Books).Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (2010) “Reply to Aldo Giorgio Gargani,” The Philosophy of Richard Rorty, Auxier, R.E. and Hahn, L. E., (eds.) (Chicago: Open Court), pp. 193195.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. (1989) Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwab, D. P. (1980). “Construct Validity in Organizational Behavior.” In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 2). Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 343.Google Scholar
Shrivastava, Paul, and Mitroff, Ian I.. (1984) “Enhancing Organizational Research Utilization: The Role of Decision Makers’ Assumptions.” Academy of Management Review 9.1: 1826.Google Scholar
Suddaby, Roy. (2010).”Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization.” The Academy of Management Review, 346–357.CrossRef
Wicks, A. C., and Freeman, R. E. (1998). “Organization Studies and the New Pragmatism: Positivism, Anti-Positivism, and the Search for Ethics.” Organization Science, 9(2), 123140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats