Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:37:27.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

24 - Technology-Mediated Language Learning

from Part V - Pedagogical Interventions and Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2019

By
Carol A. Chapelle
Edited by
John W. Schwieter  and
Alessandro Benati
John W. Schwieter
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Alessandro Benati
Affiliation:
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
Get access

Summary

Technology-mediated language learning today encompasses multifaceted issues connected with the role of digital technologies in mediating opportunities for language learning. Such opportunities arrive when teachers assign digital learning materials and tasks in a face-to-face classroom, when language programmes develop online courses that include computer-mediated interactions, and when language learners seek opportunities for study, help, and social interactions on their own. Each of these three uses of technology has arisen within a particular milieu of research and practice in applied linguistics. However, today the three intersect in dynamic and complex ways. Moreover, the areas and their intersections converge with aspects of second language studies including instructed second language acquisition, language assessment, learner autonomy and motivation, as well as informal language learning. This chapter examines the practices, issues, findings, and challenges in each of these three interconnected areas, beginning with the classroom, where the study of computer-assisted language learning has its roots in the middle of the twentieth century.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning , pp. 575 - 596
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Z. I. (2016a). Creating a social context through film: Teaching L2 pragmatics as a locally situated process. L2 Journal, 8(3), 23–45.Google Scholar
Abrams, Z. I. (2016b). Possibilities and challenges of learning German in a multimodal environment: A case study. ReCALL Journal, 28(3), 343–363.Google Scholar
Basharina, O. K. (2007). An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 11(2), 82–103.Google Scholar
Blake, R., Wilson, N. L., Cetto, M., & Pardo-Ballester, C. (2008). Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 12(3), 114–127.Google Scholar
Blin, F. (2004). CALL and the development of learner autonomy: Towards an activity-theoretical perspective. ReCALL Journal, 16(2), 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerezo, L., Baralt, M., Suh, B.-R., & Leow, R. P. (2014). Does the medium really matter in L2 development? The validity of CALL research designs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 2(1), 22–34.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C.A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027295958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The relationship between SLA theory and CALL. the Modern Language Journal, 93(4), 742–754.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2010). The spread of computer-assisted language learning. Language Teaching, 43(1), 66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2016). Teaching culture in introductory foreign language textbooks. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2017). Evaluation of technology and language learning. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 378–392). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C.A., Cotos, E., & Lee, J. (2015). Diagnostic assessment with automated writing evaluation: A look at validity arguments for new classroom assessments. Language Testing, 32(3), 385–405.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C., & Jamieson, J. (1991). Internal and external validity issues in research on CALL effectiveness. In Dunkel, P. (ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice (pp. 37–59). New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A., & Jamieson, J. (2008). Tips for teaching with CALL: Practical approaches to computer assisted language learning. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S), 64–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: An exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(3), 218–232.Google Scholar
Compton, L. K. L. (2009). Preparing language teachers to teach language online: A look at skills, roles, and responsibilities. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(1), 73–99.Google Scholar
Cotos, E. (2017). Language for specific purposes and corpus-based pedagogy. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 248–264). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dooly, M. (2017). Telecollaboration. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 169–183). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50–80.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S), 19–47.Google Scholar
Dunkel, P. (1991). The effectiveness research on computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In Dunkel, P. (ed.), Computer-assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practice (pp. 5–36). New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105.Google Scholar
Gonz´alez-Lloret, M. (2014). The need for needs analysis in technology-mediated TBLT. In Gonz´alez-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 23–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonz´alez-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Towards technology-mediated TBLT: An introduction. In Gonz´alez-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 1–22). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grgurovic, M., Chapelle, C. A., & Shelley, M. C. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL Journal, 25(2), 165–198.Google Scholar
Gruba, P., C´ardenas-Claros, M. S., Suvorov, R., & Rick, K. (2016). Blended language program evaluation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A., Chik, A., & Jones, R. H. (2015). Digital literacies and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 1–7.Google Scholar
Hampel, R. (2006). Rethinking task design for the digital age: A framework for language teaching and learning in a synchronous online environment. ReCALL, 18(1), 105–121.Google Scholar
Hauck, M. (2007). Critical success factors in a TRIDEM exchange. ReCALL, 19(2), 202–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heift, T., & Vyatkina, N. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 grammar. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 26–44). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jamieson, J., & Chapelle, C. A. (2010). Evaluating CALL use across multiple contexts. System, 38, 357–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, J., & Musumeci, M. (2017). Integrating assessment with instruction through technology. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 293–316). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Karabulut, A., LeVelle, K., Li, J., & Suvorov, R. (2012). Technology for French learning: A mismatch between expectations and reality. CALICO Journal, 29(2), 341–366.Google Scholar
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357.Google Scholar
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Lee, H., & Norris, L. (2017). Mobile learning revolution: Implications for language pedagogy. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 217–233). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, C. (2013). A framework for developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100–122.Google Scholar
Lam, E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457–482.Google Scholar
Lantolf, J., & Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of L2 development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Le, H. T. T. (2017). Investigating the language learning potential of data-driven teaching materials on source use for college students in a writing course. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Lin, H. (2015). A meta-synthesis of empirical research on the effectiveness of computer-mediated communication (CMC) in SLA. Language Learning & Technology, 19(2) 85–117.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. & Bahtia, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. (2017). Technologies for teaching and learning L2 vocabulary. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 45–61). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Modern Language Association of America (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world: MLA ad hoc committee on foreign languages. New York: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar
Norris, J. M. (2006). The why (and how) of student learning outcomes assessment in college education. The Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 590–597.Google Scholar
Otto, S. E. K. (2017). From past to present: A hundred years of technology for L2 learning. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 10–25). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pederson, K. M. (1987). Research on CALL. In Smith, W. F. (ed.), Modern media in foreign language education: Theory and implementation (pp. 99–132). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, J. (2017). Digital gaming. In Chapelle, C. and Sauro, S. (eds.), Handbook of technology in second language teaching and learning (pp. 202–216). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Risager, K. (2007). Language and culture pedagogy: From a national to a transnational paradigm. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Risager, K. (2018). Representations of the world in language textbooks. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J. C. (2017). Design-based research. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 364–377). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (5th edn.). New York: Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Rost, M., & Fuchs, M. (2004). Longman English Interactive 1–4. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Russell, V. (2012). Learning complex grammar in the virtual classroom: A comparison of Processing Instruction, structured input, computerized visual input enhancement, and traditional instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 42–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler, R. W. (2017). The continuing evolution of virtual worlds for language learning. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 184–201). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sauro, S. 2014. Lessons from the fandom: Task models for technology-enhanced language learning. In Gonz´alez-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 239–262). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sauro, S., & Chapelle, C. A. (2017). Toward langua-technocultural competence. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 184–201). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sockett, G. (2013). Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex dynamic system: An emic approach. ReCALL, 25, 48–62.Google Scholar
Straub, E. T. (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 625–649.Google Scholar
Sylv´en, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2017). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in extracurricular/extramural contexts. CALICO Journal, 34(1), i–iv.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2016). Cultures-of-use and morphologies of communicative action. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 185–191.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (eds.) (2013). Research for materials development in language learning: Evidence for best practice. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T. (1993). Input processing and second language acquisition: A role for instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ware, P. (2017). Technology, new literacies, and language learners. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 265–277). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, C. J. (2017). Distance language teaching with technology. In Chapelle, C. A. & Sauro, S. (eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 134–148). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, W., Weber-F`eve, S., & VanPatten, B. (2017). Liaisons: An introduction to French (2nd edn.). Boston, MA: Cengage.Google Scholar
Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7–27.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×