Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T21:46:35.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Sociological Approaches to Intercultural Communication

Exploring the ‘Silent Zones’

from Part II - Theoretical Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2020

By
Uttaran Dutta  and
Judith N. Martin
Edited by
Guido Rings  and
Sebastian Rasinger
Guido Rings
Affiliation:
Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge
Sebastian Rasinger
Affiliation:
Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Uttaran Dutta and Judith N. Martin’s chapter identifies influential sociological concepts and methods across various paradigmatic approaches, including the influential concept of Simmel’s ‘stranger’ as well as the contributions of European critical sociologists (e.g. Habermas, Foucault). In particular, this chapter is a plea for more attention to the ‘silent zones’ in intercultural communication research – the geographical and conceptual gaps in current scholarship. It identifies historically under-researched topics (e.g., hidden/forbidden cultural practices, posthumanism) and addresses issues of socioeconomic and structural disparities particularly in the ‘silent zones’ of the Global South region. The aim is to incorporate community authorship, alternate wisdoms and, ultimately, facilitate meaningful societal changes towards plurality, sustainability and the ecology of culture and languages.

Keywords

intercultural communicationsilent zonescritical sociologycultural practicesposthumanism
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Communication , pp. 170 - 186
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, B. K., Arasaratnam, L. A., Durham, A., Flores, L., Leeds-Hurwitz, Mendoza, Oetzel, S. L., Osland, J. G., Tsuda, J., Y., Yin, J. and Halualani, R. (2014). Identifying key intercultural urgencies, issues, and challenges in today’s world: connecting our scholarship to dynamic contexts and historical moments. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(1), 38–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, H. and Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–36.Google Scholar
Asante, M. K. (2003). The Afrocentric idea in education. In Conyers, J. L., ed., Afrocentricity and the Academy: Essays on Theory and Practice. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Austin, P. K. and Sallabank, J., eds. (2011). The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. (2015). The Dark Net: Inside the Digital Underworld. New York: Melville House.Google Scholar
Beyerstein, B. L. (2001). Alternative medicine and common errors of reasoning. Academic Medicine, 76(3), 230–37.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, E. (2010). Racism without Racists: Color-Blind Racism & Racial Inequality in Contemporary America, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Broome, B. J. (2013). Building cultures of peace: the role of intergroup dialogue. In Oezel, J. G. and Ting-Toomey, S., eds., The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory, Research, and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 737–62.Google Scholar
Calhoun, C., ed. (2002). Sociology. In Calhoun, C., ed., Dictionary of the Social Sciences. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheah, W. H., Karamehic-Muratovic, A., Matsuo, H. and Poljarevic, A. (2011). The role of language competence, interpersonal relationships, and media use in Bosnian refugees’ resettlement process. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 40(3), 219–36.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. W., Lawless, B. and González, A. (2015). Relating across difference for social change: calling attention to inter/cultural partnerships in nonprofit contexts. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(3), 187–92.Google Scholar
Chertoff, M. (2017). A public policy perspective of the dark web. Journal of Cyber Policy, 2(1), 26–38. DOI: 10.1080/23738871.2017.1298643.Google Scholar
Collier, M. J., Hegde, R. S., Lee, W. S., Nakayama, T. K. and Yep, G. A. (2001). Dialogue on the edges: ferment in communication and culture. In Collier, M. J., ed., Transforming Communication about Culture: Critical New Directions, International and Intercultural Communication Annual, vol. 24. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 219–80.Google Scholar
Collins, P. H. (2005). Black Sexual Politics: African Americans, Gender, and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cooks, L. (2001). From distance and uncertainty to research and pedagogy in the borderlands: implications for the future of intercultural communication. Communication Theory, 11(3), 339–51.Google Scholar
Coopman, T. M. (2011). Networks of dissent: emergent forms in media based collective action. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 28(2), 153–72.Google Scholar
Corbett, J. (2009). Editorial. Language and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 215–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croucher, S. M., Sommier, M. and Rahmani, D. (2015). Intercultural communication: where we’ve been, where we’re going, issues we face. Communication Research and Practice, 1(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
Cunningham, S. and Craig, D. (2016). Online entertainment: a new wave of media globalization? International Journal of Communication, 10, 5409–25.Google Scholar
De Vries, R. E. (2002). Ethnic tension in paradise: explaining ethnic supremacy aspirations in Fiji. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 26(3), 311–27.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. (2018). Negotiating structural absences: voices of indigenous subalterns of eastern India. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 47(1), 52–71.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. (2019). Conducting ethnographic research in low literate, economically weak underserved spaces: an introduction to visual aided interaction. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919855279.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. and Das, S. (2015). Digital divide at the margins: co-designing information solutions to address needs of indigenous populations of rural India. Communication Design Quarterly, 4(1), 36–48.Google Scholar
Dutta, U. and Martin, J. N. (2017). Theoretical perspectives in intercultural communication. In Chen, L., ed., Handbook of Intercultural Communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 45–66.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., ed. (1977). Language, Countermemory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M., (2003). Society Must Be Defended. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Fuhse, A. A. (2012). Embedding the stranger: ethnic categories and cultural differences in social networks. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(6), 639–55.Google Scholar
Gauthier, B. (2009). Creating anxiety: setting the stage for intercultural communication. Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(4), 721–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, A., and Peterson, T. R. (1993). Enlarging conceptual boundaries: a critique of research in intercultural communication. In Bowen, S. P., ed., Transforming Visions: Feminist Critiques in Communication Studies. New York: Hampton Press, pp. 249–78.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (1964). Assimilation in American Life: The Role of Race, Religion, and National Origins. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (1986). Towards a Theory of Intergroup Communication. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (2005). An anxiety/uncertainty management (AUM) theory of effective communication: making the mesh of the net finer. In Gudykunst, W. B., ed., Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 281–332.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. and Kim, Y. Y. (1984). Communicating with Strangers: An Approach to Intercultural Communication. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. and Shapiro, R. B. (1996). Communication in everyday interpersonal and intergroup encounters. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20(1), 19–45.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1996). Three normative models of democracy. In Benhabib, S., ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T., Mendoza, S. L. and Drzewiecka, J. A. (2009). Critical junctures in intercultural communication studies: a review, The Review of Communication Journal, 9(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
Halualani, R. T. and Nakayama, T. K. (2010). Critical intercultural communication studies at a crossroads. In Halualani, R. T. and Nakayama, T. K., eds., The Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Harman, L. D. (1988). The Modern Stranger: On Language and Membership. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsin, J. (2015). Regimes of posttruth, postpolitics, and attention economies. Communication, Culture & Critique, 8(2), 327–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, W. B. (1999). Interdisciplinary influences in the study of intercultural relations: a citation analysis of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 575–90.Google Scholar
Hartelius, E. J. (2016). ‘Undocumented and unafraid’? Challenging the bureaucratic paradigm. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 13(2), 130–49.Google Scholar
Hasian, M. Jr (2012). The Philippine–American war and the American debates about the necessity and legality of the ‘water cure’ 1901–1903. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), 106–23.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Horgan, M. (2012). Strangers & strangership. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(6), 607–22.Google Scholar
Ingraham, C. and Reeves, J. (2016). New media, new panics. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(5), 455–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. (2017). Sociolinguistic approach to intercultural communication. In Kim, Y. Y., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication, Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0068 (last accessed 1 February 2019).Google Scholar
Jana, S., Basu, I., Rotheram-Borus, M. J. and Newman, P. A. (2004). The Sonagachi Project: a sustainable community intervention program. AIDS education and prevention, 16(5), 405–14.Google Scholar
Kethineni, S., Cao, Y. and Dodge, C. (2018). Use of bitcoin in darknet markets: examining facilitative factors on bitcoin-related crimes. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(2), 141–57.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. Y. (2005) Adapting to a new culture: an integrative communication theory. In Gudykunst, W., ed., Theorizing about Intercultural Communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 375–400.Google Scholar
Kim, Y. Y. (2008). Intercultural personhood: globalization and a way of being. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 359–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochhar, R. (2015). A Global Middle Class Is More Promise than Reality: From 2001 to 2011, Nearly 700 Million Step Out of Poverty, But Most Only Barely. Washington, D.C.: Pew Research Center. www.pewglobal. org/2015/07/08/a-global-middle-class-is-more-promise-than-reality (last accessed 1 February 2019).Google Scholar
Kramsch, C. J. (2001). Intercultural communication. In Carter, R. and Nunan, D., eds., The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–6.Google Scholar
Landis, D. and Wasilewski, J. H. (1999). Reflections on 22 years of the International Journal of Intercultural Relations and 23 years in other areas of intercultural practice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23(4), 535–74.Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2012). On studying interethnic communication between the Hakka and other ethnic groups in Taiwan. Intercultural Communication Studies, 21(3), 29–40.Google Scholar
Lee, W. S., Chung, J., Wang, J., and Hertel, E. (1995). A sociohistorical approach to intercultural communication. Howard Journal of Communications, 6(4), 262–91.Google Scholar
Makin, D. A. and Morczek, A. L. (2016). X views and counting: interest in rape-oriented pornography as gendered microaggression. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(12), 2131–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mancinelli, I., Comparelli, A., Girardi, P. and Tatarelli, R. (2002). Mass suicide: historical and psychodynamic considerations. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 32(1), 91–100.Google Scholar
Marotta, V. (2012). Georg Simmel, the stranger and the sociology of knowledge. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 33(6), 675–89.Google Scholar
Mendoza, S. L. and Kinefuchi, E. (2016). Two stories, one vision: a plea for an ecological turn in intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 9(4), 275–94.Google Scholar
Merkin, R., Taras, V. and Steel, P. (2014). State of the art themes in cross-cultural communication research: a systematic and meta-analytic review. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 1–23.Google Scholar
Miller, A. N., Kizito, M. N. and Ngula, K. W. (2010). Research and publication by communication faculty in East Africa: a challenge to the global community of communication scholars. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 3(4), 286–303.Google Scholar
Moon, D. G. (2010). Critical reflections on culture and critical intercultural communication. In Nakayama, T. K. and Halualani, R. T., eds., Handbook of Critical Intercultural Communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 34–52.Google Scholar
Moon, D. G. (2016). ‘Be/coming’ white and the myth of white ignorance: identity projects in white communities. Western Journal of Communication, 80(3), 282–303.Google Scholar
Ng, S. H. and Stolte, J. F. (2017). Power in intergroup communication. In Kim, Y. Y., ed., The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi-org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/10.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0170 (last accessed 1 February 2019).Google Scholar
Nshom, E. (2016). Predictors of Finnish adolescents’ prejudice towards Russian immigrants and the effect of intergroup contact. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
Padel, F. and Das, S. (2010). Out of this Earth: East India Adivasis and the Aluminium Cartel. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33(6), 881–93.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R. Wagner, U. and Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–80.Google Scholar
Pink, S. (2009). Doing Sensory Ethnography. Thousands Oak, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Polson, E. (2011). Belonging to the network society: social media and the production of a new global middle class. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(2), 144–63.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1999). Georg Simmel’s concept of the stranger and intercultural communication research. Communication Theory, 9(1), 58–74.Google Scholar
Samochowiec, J. and Florack, A. (2010). Intercultural contact under uncertainty: the impact of predictability and anxiety on the willingness to interact with a member from an unknown cultural group. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34(4), 507–15.Google Scholar
Schneider, J. (2010). Making space for the ‘nuances of truth’: communication and uncertainty at an environmental journalists’ workshop. Science Communication, 32(2), 171–201.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1944). The stranger: an essay in social psychology. The American Journal of Sociology, 49(6), 499–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuter, R. (2012). Intercultural new media studies: the next frontier in intercultural communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 219–37.Google Scholar
Shi, Y. (2011). Creating new subjectivities: the resistant tactics of the dislocated people in China’s real estate development. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(3), 275–95.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1908). The sociological significance of the ‘stranger’. In Park, R. E. and Burgess, E. W., eds., 1921, Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 322–7.Google Scholar
Simons, G. F. and Fennig, C. D., eds. (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 21st ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Stephens, N. P. (2014). Toward a more substantive media ecology: Postman’s metaphor versus posthuman futures. International Journal of Communication, 8, 19.Google Scholar
Striley, K. M. and Lawson, S. (2014). Theorizing communication orientations of privilege: how white discourses (de)construct Australian aboriginals. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(2), 170–91.Google Scholar
Thornton, R. D. and Cimadevilla, G. (2010). Usos y abusos del participare. Buenos Aires: Ediciones INTA.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (2007). Intercultural conflict training: theory-practice approaches and research challenges. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 255–71.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (2017). Conflict face-negotiation theory: tracking its evolutionary journey. In Dai, X. and Chen, G.-M., eds., Conflict Management and Intercultural Communication. London: Routledge, pp. 123–43.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2017). World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision, Key Findings and Advance Tables. Working paper no. ESA/P/WP/248. https://esa.un.org /unpd/wpp/ publications/ (last accessed 17 July 2018).Google Scholar
Viswanath, K. and Ackerson, L. K. (2011). Race, ethnicity, language, social class, and health communication inequalities: a nationally-representative cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 6(1), 145–50.Google Scholar
Willink, K. G., Gutierrez-Perez, R., Shukri, S. and Stein, L. (2014). Navigating with the stars: critical qualitative methodological constellations for critical intercultural communication research. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 7(4), 289–316.Google Scholar
Worldometers (2018). World population. www.worldometers.info/world-population/#region (last accessed 7 August 2018).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×