Intelligence and Information Processing

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar

Anderson, M. (1988), Inspection time, information processing and the development of intelligence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01079.x Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Nettelbeck, T., & Barlow, J. (1997). Reaction time measures of speed of processing: Speed of response selection increases with age but speed of stimulus categorization does not. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 145–157.Google Scholar

Anderson, M., Reid, C., & Nelson, J. (2001). Developmental changes in inspection time: What a difference a year makes. Intelligence, 29, 475–486.Google Scholar

Baumeister, A. A., & Kellas, G. (1968). Reaction time and mental retardation. In Ellis, N. R. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (vol. 3, pp. 163–193). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Biederman, J., Monuteaux, M. C., Doyle, A. E., Seidman, L. J., Wilens, T. E., Ferrero, F., et al. (2004). Impact of executive function deficits and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on academic outcomes in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(5), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.5.757 Google Scholar

Birren, J. E., & Fisher, L. M. (1992). Aging and slowing of behavior: Consequences for cognition and survival. In Sonderegger, T. B. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1991 (pp. 1–37). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar

Bonney, K. R., Almeida, O. P., Flicker, L., Davies, S., Clarnette, R., Anderson, M., et al. (2006). Inspection time in non-demented older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1452–1456.Google Scholar

Bors, D. A., Stokes, T. L., Forrin, B., & Hodder, S. L. (1999). Inspection time and intelligence: Practice, strategies and attention. Intelligence, 27, 111–129.Google Scholar

Brand, C. R. (1996). The g factor: General intelligence and its implications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

Brand, C. R., & Deary, I. J. (1982). Intelligence and “inspection time.” In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 133–148). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Brewer, N., & Smith, G. A. (1984). How normal and retarded individuals monitor and regulate speed and accuracy of responding in serial choice tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 71–93.Google Scholar

Buehner, M., Krumm, S., Ziegler, M., & Pluecken, T. (2006). Cognitive abilities and their interplay: Reasoning, crystallized intelligence, working memory components, and sustained attention. Journal of Individual Differences, 27, 57–72.Google Scholar

Burns, N. R., & Nettelbeck, T. (2003). Inspection time in the structure of cognitive abilities: Where does IT fit? Intelligence, 31, 237–255.Google Scholar

Burns, N. R., Nettelbeck, T., & Cooper, C. J. (2000). Event-related potential correlates of some human cognitive ability constructs. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 157–168.Google Scholar

Burns, N. R., Nettelbeck, T., McPherson, J., & Stankov, L. (2007). Perceptual learning on inspection time and motion perception. Journal of General Psychology, 134, 83–100.Google Scholar

Camfield, D. A., Nolidin, K., Savage, K., Timmer, J., Croft, K., Simpson, T., et al. ( 2019). Higher plasma levels of F2-isoprostanes are associated with slower psychomotor speed in healthy older adults. Free Radical Research, 53(4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715762.2018.1513133 Google Scholar

Carlson, J. S., Jensen, C. M., & Widaman, K. (1983). Reaction time, intelligence and attention. Intelligence, 7, 329–344.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1987). Jensen’s mental chronometry: Some comments and questions. In Modgil, S. & Modgil, C. (Eds.), Arthur Jensen: Consensus and controversy (pp. 297–301, 310–311). New York: Falmer.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cerella, J. (1985). Information processing rates in the elderly. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 67–83.Google Scholar

Chevalier, N., Kurth, S., Doucette, M. R., Wiseheart, M., Deoni, S. C. L., Dean, D. C., et al. (2015). Myelination is associated with processing speed in early childhood: Preliminary insights. PLoS One, 10, e0139897.Google Scholar

Chuderski, A. (2013). When are fluid intelligence and working memory isomorphic and when are they not? Intelligence, 41(4), 244–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.003 Google Scholar

Chuderski, A. (2015). The broad factor of working memory is virtually isomorphic to fluid intelligence tested under time pressure. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.046 Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar

Coyle, T. R. (2003). A review of the worst performance rule: Evidence, theory, and alternative hypotheses. Intelligence, 31, 567–587.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. R., Deary, I. J., Allan, K. M., & Gustafsson, J. E. (1998). Evaluating competing models of the relationship between inspection time and psychometric intelligence. Intelligence, 26, 27–42.Google Scholar

Danthiir, V., Burns, N. R., Nettelbeck, T., Wilson, C., & Wittert, G. (2009). Relationships between age, processing speed, working memory, inhibition and fluid intelligence in older adults. Paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Chicago, July18–22.Google Scholar

Danthiir, V., Wilhelm, O., & Schacht, A. (2005a). Decision speed in intelligence tasks: Correctly an ability? Psychology Science, 47, 200–229.Google Scholar

Danthiir, V., Wilhelm, O., Schulze, R., & Roberts, R. D. (2005b). Factor structure and validity of paper-and-pencil measures of mental speed: Evidence for a higher-order model? Intelligence, 33, 491–514.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychophysics to the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2003). Reaction time and psychometric intelligence: Jensen’s contributions. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 53–75). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Allerhand, M., & Der, G. (2009). Smarter in middle age, faster in old age: A cross-lagged panel analysis of reaction time and cognitive ability over 13 years in the West of Scotland Twenty-07 study. Psychology and Aging, 24, 40–47.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Bastin, M. E., Pattie, A., Clayden, J. D., Whalley, L. J., Starr, J. M., et al. (2006). White matter integrity and cognition in childhood and old age. Neurology, 66, 505–512.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Der, G., & Ford, G. (2001a). Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study. Intelligence, 29, 389–399.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Hunter, R., Langan, S. J., & Goodwin, G. M. (1991). Inspection time, psychometric intelligence and clinical estimates of cognitive ability in pre-senile Alzheimer’s disease and Korsakoff’s psychosis. Brain, 114, 2543–2554.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Leaper, S. A., Murray, A. D., Staff, R. T., & Whalley, L. J. (2003). Cerebral white matter abnormalities and lifetime cognitive change: A 67-year follow-up of the Scottish Mental Survey of 1932. Psychology and Aging, 18, 140–148.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Simonotto, E., Marshall, A., Marshall, I., Goddard, N., & Wardlaw, J. M. (2001b). The functional anatomy of inspection time: A pilot fMRI study. Intelligence, 29, 497–510.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599–608.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1997). Looking down on intelligence. American Psychologist, 52, 1148–1150.Google Scholar

Deluca, J., & Kalmar, J. H. (2007). Information processing speed in clinical populations. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., & Shayer, M. (2013a). Developmental intelligence: From empirical to hidden constructs. Intelligence, 41(5), 744–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.07.014 Google Scholar

Demetriou, A., Spanoudis, G., Shayer, M., Mouyi, A., Kazi, S., & Platsidou, M. (2013b). Cycles in speed-working memory-G relations: Towards a developmental–differential theory of the mind. Intelligence, 41(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2012.10.010 Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1982). Does g exist? Intelligence, 6, 99–108.Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1987). What does reaction time tell us about intelligence? In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 177–200). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar

Duncan, J., Seitz, R. J., Koldny, J., Bor, D., Herzog, H., Ahmed, A., et al. (2000). A neural basis for general intelligence. Science, 289, 457–460.Google Scholar

Edmonds, C. J., Isaacs, E. B., Visscher, P. M., Rogers, M., Lanigan, J., Singhal, A., et al. (2008). Inspection time and cognitive abilities in twins aged 7 to 17 years: Age-related changes, heritability and genetic covariance. Intelligence, 36, 210–255.Google Scholar

Egan, V. (1994). Intelligence, inspection time and cognitive strategies. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 305–316.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Speed of information processing, reaction time, and the theory of intelligence. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 21–67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Finkel, D., Reynolds, C. A., McArdle, J. J., & Pedersen, N. L. (2007). Age changes in processing speed as a leading indicator of cognitive aging. Psychology and Aging, 22, 558–568.Google Scholar

Fox, M. C., Roring, R. W., & Mitchum, A. L. (2009). Reversing the speed-IQ correlation: Intra-individual variability and attentional control in the inspection time paradigm. Intelligence, 37, 76–80.Google Scholar

Frearson, W., & Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Intelligence, reaction time (RT) and a new “odd-man-out” RT paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 807–817.Google Scholar

Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (2000). Relationships among processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence in children. Biological Psychology, 54, 1–34.Google Scholar

Galloway-Long, H., & Huang-Pollock, C. (2018). Using inspection time and ex-Gaussian parameters of reaction time to predict executive functions in children with ADHD. Intelligence, 69, 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.005 Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Callaghan, A., Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2009). Inspection time predicts individual differences in everyday functioning among elderly adults: Testing discriminant validity. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28, 87–92.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Nettelbeck, T., Howard, S., & Wilson, C. (2008). Inspection time: A biomarker for cognitive decline. Intelligence, 36, 664–671.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Nettelbeck, T., Howard, S., & Wilson, C. (2009a). A test of the cascade model in the elderly. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 71–73.Google Scholar

Gregory, T., Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (2009b). Within-person changes in inspection time predict memory. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 741–743.Google Scholar

Grudnik, J. L., & Kranzler, J. H. (2001). Meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and inspection time. Intelligence, 29, 523–535.Google Scholar

Gunning-Dixon, F. M., & Raz, N. (2000). The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology, 14, 224–232.Google Scholar

Hertzog, C., Kramer, A. F., Wilson, R. S., & Lindenberger, U. (2008). Enrichment effects on adult cognitive development: Can the functional capacity of older adults be preserved and enhanced? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9, 1–65.Google Scholar

Hick, W. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Noll, J. (1997). Human cognitive capabilities: Gf-Gc theory. In Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 53–91). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. (1980). Intelligence as an information processing concept. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 449–474.Google Scholar

Hutchison, C. W., Nathan, P. J., Mrazek, L., & Stough, C. (2001). Cholinergic modulation of speed of early information processing: The effect of donepezil on inspection time. Psychopharmacology, 44, 440–442.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1982). Reaction time and psychometric g. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 93–132). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1987). Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 101–175). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: the science of mental ability. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Juhel, J. (1991). Relationships between psychometric intelligence and information-processing speed indexes. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 73–105.Google Scholar

Kail, R. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2009). Associative learning predicts intelligence above and beyond working memory and processing speed. Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.03.004 Google Scholar

Krumm, S., Schmidt-Atzert, L., Michalczyk, K., & Danthiir, V. (2008). Speeded paper-pencil sustained attention and mental speed tests. Journal of Individual Differences, 29, 205–216.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity? Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Langner, R., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013). Sustaining attention to simple tasks: A meta-analytic review of the neural mechanisms of vigilant attention. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 870–900. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030694 Google Scholar

Larson, G. E., & Alderton, D. L. (1990). Reaction time variability and intelligence: A “worst performance” analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 14, 309–325.Google Scholar

Lehrl, S., & Fischer, B. (1990). A basic information psychological parameter (BIP) for the reconstruction of concepts of intelligence. European Journal of Personality, 4, 259–286.Google Scholar

Longstreth, L. E. (1984). Jensen’s reaction time investigations of intelligence: A critique. Intelligence, 8, 139–160.Google Scholar

Luciano, M., Smith, G. A., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., & Martin, N. G. (2001). On the heritability of inspection time and its covariance with IQ: A twin study. Intelligence, 29, 443–457.Google Scholar

Luciano, M., Wright, M. J., Geffen, G. M., Geffen, L. B., Smith, G. A., & Martin, N. G. (2004). A genetic investigation of the covariation among inspection time, choice reaction time, and IQ subtest scores. Behavior Genetics, 34, 41–50.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1986). The biology of intelligence? British Journal of Psychology, 77, 1–18.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J., & Bennett, E. S. (2002). IT, IQ and perceptual speed. Personality and Individual Differences, 32(4), 685–693.Google Scholar

Madden, D. J. (2001). Speed and timing in behavioral processes. In Birren, J. E. & Schaie, K. W. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 288–312). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Marr, D. B., & Sternberg, R. J. (1987). The role of mental speed in intelligence: A triarchic perspective. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 271–294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1993). The intelligence of emotional intelligence. Intelligence, 17, 433–442.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present and future. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment (2nd ed., pp. 156–182). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Meiran, N., & Shahar, N. (2018). Working memory involvement in reaction time and its contribution to fluid intelligence: An examination of individual differences in reaction-time distributions. Intelligence, 69, 176–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.06.004 Google Scholar

Nathan, P. J., & Stough, C. (2001). Inspection time: A neuropsychophysiological test for measuring the functional integrity of the cholinergic system. Medical Hypotheses, 57, 759–760.Google Scholar

Nathan, P. J., Stough, C., & Siteram, G. (2000). Serotonin and information processing: A pharmacodynamic study on the effects of citalopram on cognitive and psychomotor function. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 15, 306–307.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1985). What reaction times time. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 193–263.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1987). Inspection time and intelligence. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 295–346). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1994). Speediness. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human intelligence. (pp. 1014–1019). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (1998). Jensen’s chronometric research: Neither simple nor sufficient but a good place to start. Intelligence, 29, 233–241.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (2001). Correlation between inspection time and psychometric abilities: A personal interpretation. Intelligence, 29, 459–474.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T. (2003). Inspection time and g. In Nyborg, H. (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 77–91). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., Gregory, T., Wilson, C., Burns, N., Danthiir, V., & Wittert, G. (2008). Inspection time: A marker for less successful ageing. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Conference of the International Society for Intelligence Research (ISIR), Decatur, Georgia, December 11–13.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Kirby, N. H. (1983). Measures of timed performance and intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 39–52.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Lally, M. (1976). Inspection time and measured intelligence. British Journal of Psychology, 67, 17–22.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Vita, P. (1992). Inspection time in two childhood age cohorts: A constant of a developmental function? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 189–198.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (1985). A cross-sequential analysis of developmental differences in speed of visual information processing. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 1–22.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Wilson, C. (1997). Speed of information processing and cognition. In Maclean, W. E. J. (Ed.), Ellis’ handbook of mental deficiency, psychological theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 245–274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, T., & Young, R. (1989). Inspection time and intelligence in 6 year old children. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 605–614.Google Scholar

Neubauer, A. C. (1997). The mental speed account to the assessment of intelligence In Carlson, J. S., Kingma, J., & Tomic, W. (Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Reflections on the concept of intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 149–173). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Neubauer, A. C., & Bucik, V. (1996). The mental speed-IQ relationship: Unitary or modular? Intelligence, 22, 23–48.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Süβ, H.-M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittmann, W. W. (2008). Which working memory functions predict intelligence? Intelligence, 36(6), 641–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.01.007 Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Schulze, R., & Süß, H.-M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence – their correlation and their relation: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.61 Google Scholar

O’Connor, T. A., & Burns, N. R. (2003). Inspection time and general speed of processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 713–724.Google Scholar

Olsson, H., Björkman, C., Haag, K., & Juslin, P. (1998). Auditory inspection time: On the importance of selecting the appropriate sensory continuum. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 627–634.Google Scholar

Parker, D. M., Crawford, J. R., & Stephen, E. (1999). Auditory inspection time and intelligence: A new spatial localization task. Intelligence, 27, 131–139.Google Scholar

Petrill, S. A., Luo, D., Thompson, L. A., & Detterman, D. K. (2001). Inspection time and the relationship among elementary cognitive tasks, general intelligence, and specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 29, 487–496.Google Scholar

Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Posthuma, D., de Geus, E. J. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2001). Perceptual speed and IQ are associated through common genetic factors Behavior Genetics, 31, 593–602.Google Scholar

Rabbitt, P., Scott, M., Lunn, M., Thacker, N., Lowe, C., Pedleton, N., et al. (2007). White matter lesions account for all age-related declines in speed but not in intelligence. Neuropsychology, 21, 363–370.Google Scholar

Ratcliff, R., & Smith, P. L. (2004). A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 111, 333–367.Google Scholar

Reed, T. E., & Jensen, A. R. (1992). Conduction velocity in a brain nerve pathway of normal adults correlates with intelligence level. Intelligence, 16, 259–272.Google Scholar

Reed, T. E., & Jensen, A. R. (1993). Choice reaction time and visual pathway nerve conduction velocity both correlate with intelligence but appear not to correlate with each other: Implications for information processing. Intelligence, 17, 191–203.Google Scholar

Reed, T. E., Vernon, P. A., & Johnson, A. M. (2004). Confirmation of correlation between brain nerve conduction velocity and intelligence level in normal adults. Intelligence, 32, 563–572.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Bates, T. C., Der, G., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2013). Education is associated with higher later life IQ scores, but not with faster cognitive processing speed. Psychology and Aging, 28(2), 515–521. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030820 Google Scholar

Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 1–120.Google Scholar

Rockstroh, S., & Schweizer, K. (2004). The effect of retest practice on the speed-ability relationship. European Psychologist, 9, 24–31.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A. (2006). Mental exercise and mental aging. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 68–87.Google Scholar

Schafer, E. P. W. (1985). Neural adaptability: A biological determinant of g factor intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 240–241.Google Scholar

Schaie, K. W. (2005). Developmental influences on adult intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Schmiedek, F., Oberauer, K., Wilhelm, O., Süß, H.-M., & Wittmann, W. W. (2007). Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 414–429.Google Scholar

Schweizer, K., Zimmermann, P., & Koch, W. (2000). Sustained attention, intelligence, and the crucial role of perceptual processes. Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 271–287.Google Scholar

Sculthorpe, L. D., Stelmack, R. M., & Campbell, K. B. (2009). Mental ability and the effect of pattern violation discrimination on P300 and mismatch negativity. Intelligence, 37, 405–411.Google Scholar

Sheppard, L. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2008). Intelligence and speed of information-processing: A review of 50 years of research. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 535–551.Google Scholar

Smith, G. A., & Carew, M. (1987). Decision time unmasked: Individuals adopt different strategies. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39, 339–351.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Intelligence, information processing, and analogical reasoning: The componential analysis of human abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, intelligence and creativity synthesized. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1–32.Google Scholar

Stough, C., Bates, T., Mangan, G. L., & Colrain, I. (2001a). Inspection time and intelligence: Further attempts at reducing the apparent motion strategy. Intelligence, 29, 219–230.Google Scholar

Stough, C., Nettelbeck, T., Cooper, C., & Bates, T. (1995). Strategy use in Jensen’s RT Paradigm: Relationships to intelligence? Australian Journal of Psychology, 47, 61–65.Google Scholar

Stough, C., Thompson, J. C., Bates, T. C., & Nathan, P. J. (2001b). Examining neurochemical determinants of inspection time: Development of a biological model. Intelligence, 29, 511–522.Google Scholar

Strachan, M. W. J., Deary, I. J., Ewing, F. M. E., Ferguson, S. S. C., Young, M. J., & Frier, B. M. (2001). Acute hypoglycemia impairs the functioning of the central but not peripheral nervous system. Physiology and Behavior, 72, 83–92.Google Scholar

Stroud, J. M. (1956). The fine structure of psychological time. In Quastler, H. (Ed.), Information theory in psychology. Glencoe, UK: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. C., Stough, C., Nathan, P. J., Ames, D., & Ritchie, C. (2000). Effects of the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine on inspection time. Psychopharmacology, 150(1), 117–119.Google Scholar

Turvey, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1–52.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N. (2010). Interference control, working memory capacity, and cognitive abilities: A latent variable analysis. Intelligence, 38(2), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2009.12.003 Google Scholar

Verhaeghen, P. (2013). The elements of cognitive aging: Meta-analyses of age-related differences in processing speed and their consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A. (1987). New developments in reaction time research. In Vernon, P. A. (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 1–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A., & Mori, M. (1992). Intelligence, reaction times, and peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Intelligence, 16, 273–288.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. A., Wickett, J. C., Bazana, P. C., & Stelmack, R. M. (2000). The neuropsychology and psychophysiology of human intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vickers, D., Nettelbeck, T., & Willson, R. J. (1972). Perceptual indices of performance: The measurement of “inspection time” and “noise” in the visual system. Perception, 1, 263–295.Google Scholar

Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Zajac, I. T., & Burns, N. R. (2007). Measuring auditory inspection time in primary school children. Journal of Individual Differences, 28, 45–52.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Aron, A. R., Robbins, T. W., & Poldrack, R. A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170–177.Google Scholar

Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W., Valentin, V. V., & Casale, M. B. (2005). FROST: A distributed neurocomputational model of working memory maintenance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1728–1743.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In Spence, K. W. & Spence, J. T. (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 2, pp. 89–195). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1971). The control of short-term memory. Scientific American, 225, 82–90.Google Scholar

Awh, E., Fukuda, K., Vogel, E. K., & Mayr, U. (2009). Quantity not quality: The relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Paper presented at the fiftieth annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, November.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower, G. A. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Bartholomew, D. J., Deary, I. J., & Lawn, M. (2009). A new lease of life for Thomson’s bonds model of intelligence. Psychological Review, 116(3), 567–579. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0016262 Google Scholar

Bayliss, D. M., Jarrold, C., Gunn, D. M., & Baddeley, A. D. (2003). The complexities of complex span: Explaining individual differences in working memory in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 71–92.Google Scholar

Binet, A. (1903). Etude expérimentale de l’intelligence (The experimental study of intelligence). Paris: Schlecher.Google Scholar

Botvinick, M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366.Google Scholar

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.Google Scholar

Bunge, S. A., Klingberg, T., Jacobsen, R. B., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2000). A resource model of the neural basis of executive working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 3573–3578.Google Scholar

Bunting, M. F. (2006). Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 183–196.Google Scholar

Burgess, G. C., Braver, T. S., Conway, A. R. A., & Gray, J. R. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 674–692.Google Scholar

Case, R., Kurland, M. D., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404.Google Scholar

Chein, J. M., Moore, A. B., & Conway, A. R. A. (2011). Domain-general mechanisms of active maintenance and serial recall in complex working memory span. Neuroimage, 54, 550–559.Google Scholar

Chuah, Y. M. L., & Maybery, M. T. (1999). Verbal and spatial short-term memory: Common sources of developmental change? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73, 7–44.Google Scholar

Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, M., & Kyllonen, P. C. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32, 277–296.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(5), 769–786.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1988). Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information processing system. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 163–191.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.Google Scholar

Cowan, N. (2005). Working memory capacity. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S., Hismjatullina, A., et al. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51(1), 42–100.Google Scholar

Cowan, N., Fristoe, N. M., Elliott, E. M., Brunner, R. P., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory and Cognition, 34, 1754–1768.Google Scholar

Crowder, R. G. (1982). The demise of short-term memory. Acta Psychologica, 50, 291–323.Google Scholar

Dahlin, E., Bäckman, L., Neely, A. S., & Nyberg, L. (2009). Training of the executive component of working memory: Subcortical areas mediate transfer effects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(5), 405–419.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Behavior and Verbal Learning, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561–584.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Merikle, P. M. (1996). Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 422–433.Google Scholar

Davelaar, E. J., Goshen-Gottstein, Y., Ashkenazi, A., Haarmann, H. J., & Usher, M. (2005). The demise of short-term memory revisited: Empirical and computational investigations of recency effects. Psychological Review, 112, 3–42.Google Scholar

Dempster, F. N., & Corkill, A. J. (1999). Interference and inhibition in cognition and behavior: Unifying themes for educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 11, 1–88.Google Scholar

Drew, T., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Working memory capacity limitations. In Squire, L. R. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of neuroscience (vol. 10, pp. 523–531). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Dunlosky, J., & Kane, M. J. (2007). The contributions of strategy use to working memory span: A comparison of strategy-assessment methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1227–1245.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In Ross, B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 145–199). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245.Google Scholar

Frank, M. J., Loughry, B., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2001). Interactions between the frontal cortex and basal ganglia in working memory: A computational model. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 1, 137–160.Google Scholar

Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory and Cognition, 26, 263–276.Google Scholar

Gignac, G. E. (2014). Fluid intelligence shares closer to 60% of its variance with working memory capacity and is a better indicator of general intelligence. Intelligence, 47, 122–133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.09.004 Google Scholar

Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003). Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 316–322.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z. (2003). Why are some people more knowledgeable than others? A longitudinal study of real-world knowledge acquisition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 902–917.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2002). Effects of domain knowledge, working memory capacity, and age on cognitive performance: An investigation of the knowledge-is-power hypothesis. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 339–387.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Meinz, E. J. (2011). Limits on the predictive power of domain-specific experience and knowledge in skilled performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 275–279. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422061 Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2005). Does domain knowledge moderate involvement of working memory capacity in higher-level cognition? A test of three models. Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 377–397.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1949). Organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Miura, T. K., & Colflesh, G. J. H. (2007). Working memory, attention control, and the n-back task: A question of construct validity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 615–622.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working-memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual-differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 637–671.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217.Google Scholar

Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009). How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Developmental Science, 12(6), 976–990.Google Scholar

Kondo, H., Morishita, M., Osaka, N., Osaka, M., Fukuyama, H., & Shibasaki, H. (2004). Functional roles of the cingulo-frontal network in performance on working memory. Neuroimage, 21, 2–14.Google Scholar

Kovacs, K., & Conway, A. R. A. (2016). Process overlap theory: A unified account of the general factor of intelligence. Psychological Inquiry, 27(3). http://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2016.1153946 Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.Google Scholar

Mackintosh, N. J., & Bennett, E. S. (2003). The fractionation of working memory maps onto different components of intelligence. Intelligence, 31, 519–531.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004 Google Scholar

McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27, 817–835.Google Scholar

McNamara, D. S., & Scott, J. L. (2001). Working memory capacity and strategy use. Memory and Cognition, 29, 10–17.Google Scholar

Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.Google Scholar

Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Rettinger, D. A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621–640.Google Scholar

Mukunda, K. V., & Hall, V. C. (1992). Does performance on memory for order correlate with performance on standardized measures of ability? A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 16, 81–97.Google Scholar

Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2008). Neural correlates of access to short-term memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14228–14233.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28, 411–421.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Greaves, M. (2012). Modeling working memory: An interference model of complex span. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(5), 779–819. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0272-4 Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Schulze, R., Wilhelm, O., & Süß, H. M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence – their correlation and their relation: A comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 61–65.Google Scholar

Oberauer, K., Süß, H. M., Wilhelm, O., & Wittman, W. W. (2003). The multiple faces of working memory: Storage, processing, supervision, and coordination. Intelligence, 31, 167–193.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, R. C., & Frank, M. J. (2006). Making working memory work: A computational model of learning in the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia. Neural Computation, 18, 283–328.Google Scholar

O’Reilly, R. C., & Norman, K. A. (2002). Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 505–510.Google Scholar

Osaka, M., Osaka, N., Kondo, H., Morishita, M., Fukuyama, H., Aso, T., et al. (2003). The neural basis of individual differences in working memory capacity: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 18, 789–797.Google Scholar

Osaka, N., Osaka, M., Kondo, H., Morishita, M., Fukuyama, H., & Shibasaki, H. (2004). The neural basis of executive function in working memory: An fMRI study based on individual differences. Neuroimage, 21, 623–631.Google Scholar

Pollack, I., Johnson, I. B., & Knaff, P. R. (1959). Running memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 137–146.Google Scholar

Postle, B. R. (2006). Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience, 139, 23–38.Google Scholar

Ranganath, C. (2006). Working memory for visual objects: Complementary roles of inferior temporal, medial temporal, and prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience, 139(1), 277–289.Google Scholar

Sederberg, P. B., Howard, M. W., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893–912.Google Scholar

Shah, P., & Miyake, A. (1996). The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 4–27.Google Scholar

Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1970). Independent functioning of verbal memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 261–273.Google Scholar

Smith, E. E., Geva, A., Jonides, J., Miller, A., Reuter-Lorenz, P., & Koeppe, R. A. (2001). The neural basis of task-switching in working memory: Effects of performance and aging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 2095–2100.Google Scholar

Süß, H. M., Oberauer, K., Wittman, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.Google Scholar

Thompson, G. (1916). A hierarchy without a general factor. British Journal of Psychology, 8, 271–281.Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The measurement of intelligence. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.Google Scholar

Turley-Ames, K. J., & Whitfield, M. M. (2003). Strategy training and working memory task performance. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 446–468.Google Scholar

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2006a). Simple and complex memory spans and their relation to fluid abilities: Evidence from list-length effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 68–80.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2006b). A temporal-contextual retrieval account of complex span: An analysis of errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 346–362.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, A. (2010). The contributions of primary and secondary memory to working memory capacity: An individual differences analysis of immediate free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 240–247.Google Scholar

Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 784–775.Google Scholar

Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1969). The selective impairment of auditory verbal short-term memory. Brain, 92, 885–896.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (2005). Ability determinants of individual differences in skilled performance. In Sternberg, R. J. & Pretz, J. E. (Eds.), Cognition and intelligence: Identifying the mechanisms of the mind (pp. 142–159). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar

Arteche, A., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2008). The relationship of trait EI with personality, IQ and sex in a UK sample of employees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 421–426.Google Scholar

Bara, B. G., Bucciarelli, M., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1995). Development of syllogistic reasoning. American Journal of Psychology, 108, 157–193.Google Scholar

Beauducel, A., Brocke, B., & Liepmann, D. (2001). Perspectives on fluid and crystallized intelligence: Facets for verbal, numerical, and figural intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(6), 977–994.Google Scholar

Beauducel, A., & Kersting, M. (2002). Fluid and crystallized intelligence and the Berlin Model of Intelligence Structure (BIS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 97–112.Google Scholar

Bilalic, M., & Campitelli, G. (2018). Studies of the activation and structural changes of the brain associated with expertise. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 233–256). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Burt, C. (1909). Experimental tests of higher mental processes and their relation to general intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 94–177.Google Scholar

Campbell, D. J. (1988). Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 13, 40–52.Google Scholar

Carlstedt, B., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Ullstadius, E. (2000). Item sequencing effects on the measurement of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 145–160.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40(3), 153–193.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.Google Scholar

Chastain, R. L. (1992). Adaptive processing in complex learning and cognitive performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Chernyshenko, O. S., Stark, S., & Drasgow, F. (2011). Individual differences: Their measurement and validity. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (vol. 2, pp. 117–151). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. (1988). Intelligence, task complexity and tests of sustained attention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599–608.Google Scholar

Detterman, D. K. (1986). Human intelligence is a complex system of separate processes. In Sternberg, R. J. & Detterman, D. K. (Eds.), What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition (pp. 57–61). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Douven, I. (2017). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, s.v. Abduction. https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2017/entries/abduction Google Scholar

Elson, S. B., Hartman, R., Beatty, A., Trippe, M., Buckley, K., Bornmann, J., et al. (2018). Critical analytic thinking skills: Do they predict job-related task performance above and beyond general intelligence? Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 4(1), 9–29.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (1983). Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 179–197.Google Scholar

Embretson, S. E. (2016). Understanding examinees’ responses to items: Implications for measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 35, 6–22.Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T., & Feeney, A. (2004). The role of prior belief in reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 78–102). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, J. S. B. T., & Over, D. E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. N., & McDaniel, M. A. (2001). The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman’s (1988) model and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 60–79.Google Scholar

Feltovich, P. J., Prietula, M. J., & Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Studies of expertise from psychological perspectives. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 41–68). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fry, A. F., & Hale, S. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7, 237–241.Google Scholar

Furnham, A., Crump, J., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Managerial level, personality and intelligence. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 805–818.Google Scholar

Galotti, K. M., Baron, J., & Sabini, J. P. (1986). Individual differences in syllogistic reasoning: Deduction rules or mental models? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 16–25.Google Scholar

Gambrell, J. L. (2013). Effects of age and schooling on 22 ability and achievement tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1997). Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American Psychologist, 52(1), 45–56.Google Scholar

Gilhooly, K. J. (2004). Working memory and reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 49–77). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gobet, F., & Waters, A. J. (2003). The role of constraints in expert memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 1082–1094.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E. (1988). Hierarchical models of individual differences in cognitive abilities. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 35–71). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10, 371–388.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25(1), 320–327.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., & Butler, H. A. (2018). Is critical thinking a better model of intelligence? In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 183–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1998). A basis for research on age differences in cognitive capabilities. In McArdle, J. J. & Woodcock, R. W. (Eds.), Human cognitive abilities in theory and practice (pp. 57–91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Blankson, N. (2005). Foundations for better understanding of cognitive abilities. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, test, and issues (vol. 2, pp. 41–68). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Horn, J. L., & Masunaga, H. (2006). A merging theory of expertise and intelligence. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 587–612). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86, 431–468.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. B. (2010). Human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, E. B., Frost, N., & Lunneborg, C. (1973). Individual differences in cognition: A new approach to intelligence. In Bower, G. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 7, pp. 87–122). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1982). The chronometry of intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 1, pp. 255–310). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2005a). Constructive replication of the visual-perceptual-image rotation model in Thurstone’s (1941) battery of 60 tests of mental ability. Intelligence, 33, 417–430.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2005b). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2011). Placing inspection time, reaction time, and perceptual speed in the broader context of cognitive ability: The VPR model in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. Intelligence, 39, 405–417.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Gottesman, I. I. (2006). Clarifying process versus structure in human intelligence: Stop talking about fluid and crystallized. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 136–137.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bouchard, T. J. Jr. (2007). Replication of the hierarchical visual-perceptual-image rotation model in de Wolff and Buiten’s (1963) battery of 46 tests of mental ability. Intelligence, 35, 69–81.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2004). Mental models and reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 169–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Byrne, R. M. (1991). Deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Khemlani, S. S. (2013). Toward a unified theory of reasoning. Psychology of learning and motivation, 59, 1–42.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow, vol. 1. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, adult development, and work motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29, 440–458.Google Scholar

Kuncel, N. R. (2011). Measurement and meaning of critical thinking (Research report for the NRC 21st Century Skills Workshop). Washington: National Research Council.Google Scholar

Kvist, A. V., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2008). The relation between fluid intelligence and the general factor as a function of cultural background: A test of Cattell’s investment theory. Intelligence, 36, 422–436.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Larson, G. E., Merritt, C. R., & Williams, S. E. (1988). Information processing and intelligence: Some implications of task complexity. Intelligence, 12(2), 131–147.Google Scholar

Leighton, J. P. (2004). The assessment of logical reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 291–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education: Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. Research Report ETS RR-14-10. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F. (1988). Spatial abilities as traits, processes, and knowledge. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 181–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., & Hagen, E. (2001). Cognitive Abilities Test (Form 6). Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., Korb, K., & Lakin, J. M. (2008). Identifying academically gifted English language learners using nonverbal tests: A comparison of the Raven, NNAT, and CogAT. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 275–296.Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. M. (2017). Cognitive Abilities Test (Forms 7 & 8): Research handbook. Itasca, IL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Major, J. T., Johnson, W., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Comparing models of intelligence in Project TALENT: The VPR model fits better than the CHC and extended Gf–Gc models. Intelligence, 40, 543–559.Google Scholar

Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 223–247.Google Scholar

Marshalek, B. (1981). Trait and process aspects of vocabulary knowledge and verbal ability. Technical Report No. 15. Aptitude Research Project, School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Marshalek, B., Lohman, D. F., & Snow, R. E. (1983). The complexity continuum in the radex and hierarchical models of intelligence. Intelligence, 7(2), 107–127.Google Scholar

Martinez, M. E. (2000). Education as the cultivation of intelligence. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Naglieri, J. A. (1996). Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace Educational Measurement.Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success: A meta‐analysis. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367–408.Google Scholar

Nickerson, R. S. (2004). Teaching reasoning. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 410–442). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). Cognitive abilities. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology (pp. 179–224). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., Viswesvaran, C., & Salgado, J. F. (2010). Cognitive abilities. In Farr, J. & Tippins, N. (Eds.), Handbook of employee selection (pp. 235–275). Clifton, NJ: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (2015). Education for life and work: Developing transferrable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Postlethwaite, B. E. (2011). Fluid ability, crystallized ability, and performance across multiple domains: A meta-analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.Google Scholar

Primi, R. (2001). Complexity of geometric inductive reasoning tasks contribution to the understanding of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 41–70.Google Scholar

Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. L. (2006). Laboratory studies of training, skill acquisition, and retention of performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Feltovich, P. J., & Hoffman, R. R. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 265–286). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Raaheim, K. (1988). Intelligence and task novelty. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 4, pp. 73–97). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1977). Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar

Rips, L. J. (1994). The psychology of proof. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Roberts, M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: Deductive rules or mental models, or both? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 569–589.Google Scholar

Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 1–120.Google Scholar

Robinson, C. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1978). Making inferences about relevance in understanding problems. In Revlin, R. & Mayer, R. E. (Eds.), Human reasoning (pp. 195–206). Washington: Halsted Press.Google Scholar

Rozeboom, W. W. (1997). Good science is abductive, not hypothetico-deductive. In Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 335–391). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ryans, D. G. (1938). A study of the observed relationship between persistence test results, intelligence indices, and academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 29, 573–580.Google Scholar

Salgado, J. F. (2017). Using ability tests in selection. In The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of recruitment, selection and employee retention (pp. 113–150). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A., Babcock, R. L., Mitchell, D. R. D., Palmon, R., & Skovronek, E. (1990). Sources of individual differences in spatial visualization ability. Intelligence, 14, 187–230.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar

Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D. P. & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 99–144). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Sechrest, L. (1963). Incremental validity: A recommendation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 23, 153–158.Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., Kyllonen, P. C., & Marshalek, B. (1984). The topography of learning and ability correlations. Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, 2, 47–103.Google Scholar

Snow, R. E., & Lohman, D. F. (1989). Implications of cognitive psychology for educational measurement. In Linn, R. (Ed.), Educational measurement (vol. 3, pp. 263–331). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of “intelligence” and the principles of cognition. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Spilsbury, G. (1992). Complexity as a reflection of the dimensionality of a task. Intelligence, 16, 31–45.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., Sá, W. C., & West, R. F. (2004). Individual differences in thinking, reasoning, and decision making. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 375–409). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2010). A framework for critical thinking, rational thinking and intelligence. In Preiss, D. D. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), Educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching and human development (pp. 195–237). New York: Springer Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264.Google Scholar

Stenning, K., & Monaghan, P. (2004). Strategies and knowledge representation. In Leighton, J. P. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The nature of reasoning (pp. 129–168). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Toward a unified theory of human reasoning. Intelligence, 10, 281–314.Google Scholar

Strenze, T. (2015). Intelligence and success. In Goldstein, S., Princiotta, D., & Naglieri, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of intelligence: Evolutionary theory, historical perspective, and current concepts (pp. 405–413). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Süß, H.-M., & Beauducel, A. (2005). Faceted models of intelligence. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of measuring and understanding intelligence (pp. 313–332). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Süß, H.-M., Oberauer, K., Wittmann, W. W., Wilhelm, O., & Schulze, R. (2002). Working memory capacity explains reasoning ability – and a little bit more. Intelligence, 30, 261–288.Google Scholar

Swiney, J. F. (1985). A study of executive processes in intelligence. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar

Thurstone, L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Toulmin, S., Rieke, R., & Janik, A. (1984). An introduction to reasoning (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

US Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (2018). Standard occupational classification manual. www.bls.gov/soc/2018/soc_2018_manual.pdf Google Scholar

Vernon, P. E. (1950). The structure of human abilities. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. E. (1965). Ability factors and environmental influences. American Psychologist, 20, 723–733.Google Scholar

West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941.Google Scholar

Wilhelm, O. (2005). Measuring reasoning ability. In Wilhelm, O. & Engle, R. W. (Eds.), Handbook of measuring and understanding intelligence (pp. 373–392). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60–82.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L. (1996). A theory of adult intellectual development: Process, personality, interests, and knowledge. Intelligence, 22, 227–257.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 567–589.Google Scholar

Ackerman, P. L., Beier, M. E., & Boyle, M. O. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 30–60.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.Google Scholar

Arthur, W., Barret, G. V., & Alexander, R. A. (1991). Prediction of vehicular accident involvement: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 4, 89–105.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626.Google Scholar

Binet, A. (1909/1975). Modern ideas about children (trans. S. Heisler). California: University of California.Google Scholar

Bingham, W. V. (1937). Aptitudes and aptitude testing. Oxford: Harpers.Google Scholar

Brown, R. E. (2016). Hebb and Cattell: The genesis of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(606). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00606 Google Scholar

Burgoyne, A. P., Hambrick, D. Z., & Altmann, E. M. (in press). Placekeeping ability as a component of fluid intelligence: Not just working memory capacity. American Journal of Psychology.Google Scholar

Burgoyne, A. P., Sala, G., Gobet, F., Macnamara, B. N., Campitelli, G., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2016). The relationship between cognitive ability and chess skill: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Intelligence, 59, 72–83.Google Scholar

Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Miller-Johnson, S., Burchinal, M., & Ramey, C. T. (2001). The development of cognitive and academic abilities: Growth curves from an early childhood educational experiment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 231–242.Google Scholar

Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97, 404–431.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1943). The measurement of adult intelligence. Psychological Bulletin, 40, 153–193.Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.Google Scholar

Chooi, W. T., & Thompson, L. A. (2012). Working memory training does not improve intelligence in healthy young adults. Intelligence, 40, 531–542.Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Cognitive Training Data (2014). Cognitive training data response letter. www.cognitivetrainingdata.org/the-controversy-does-brain-training-work/response-letter Google Scholar

Conway, A. R. A., & Kovacs, K. (2013). Individual differences in intelligence and working memory: A review of latent variable models. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 58, 233–270.Google Scholar

Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.Google Scholar

Danner, D., Hagemann, D., Holt, D. V., Hager, M., Schankin, A., Wüstenberg, S., et al. (2011). Measuring performance in dynamic decision making. Journal of Individual Differences, 32, 225–233.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J. (2000). Looking down on human intelligence: From psychometrics to the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35, 13–21.Google Scholar

Deary, I. J., & Whalley, L. J. (2001). Longitudinal cohort study of childhood IQ and survival up to age 76. British Medical Journal, 322, 819–822.Google Scholar

Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (trans. L. Lees). Psychological Monographs, 58, i–113.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.Google Scholar

Engle, R. W. (2018). Working memory and executive attention: A revisit. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 190–193.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2013). My exploration of Gagné’s “evidence” for innate talent. It is Gagné who is omitting troublesome information so as to present more convincing accusations. In Kaufman, S. B. (Ed.), The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice (pp. 223–256). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: A response to criticisms. Intelligence, 45, 81–103.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2018a). Superior working memory in experts. In Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 696–713). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (2018b). Intelligence as domain-specific reproducible performance: The role of acquired domain-specific mechanisms in expert performance. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of human intelligence (pp. 85–100). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., & Moxley, J. (2013). Working memory that mediates experts’ performance: Why it is qualitatively different from traditional working memory. In Alloway, T. P. & Alloway, R. (Eds.), Working memory: The connected intelligence (pp. 109–136). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Ericsson, A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the new science of expertise. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. N., & McDaniel, M. A. (2001). The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman’s (1988) model and the General Aptitude Test Battery. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 60–79.Google Scholar

Federal Trade Commission (2016). Lumosity to pay $2 million to settle FTC deceptive advertising charges for its “brain training” program. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/01/lumosity-pay-2-million-settle-ftc-deceptive-advertising-charges Google Scholar

Ferriman Robertson, K., Smeets, S., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2010). Beyond the threshold hypothesis: Even among the gifted and top math/science graduate students, cognitive abilities, vocational interests, and lifestyle preferences matter for career choice, performance, and persistence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 346–351.Google Scholar

Frensch, P. A., & Funke, J. (1995). Definitions, traditions, and a general framework for understanding complex problem solving. In Frensch, P. A. & Funke, J. (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Gallagher, A. G., Cowie, R., Crothers, I., Jordan-Black, J. A., & Satava, R. M. (2003). PicSOr: an objective test of perceptual skill that predicts laparoscopic technical skill in three initial studies of laparoscopic performance. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 17, 1468–1471.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1999). Who owns intelligence? The Atlantic Monthly, 283, 67–76.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 13–23.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004). Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 1–4.Google Scholar

Greiff, S., Fischer, A., Wüstenberg, S., Sonnleitner, P., Brunner, M., & Martin, R. (2013a). A multitrait-multimethod study of assessment instruments for complex problem solving. Intelligence, 41, 579–596.Google Scholar

Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Dynamic problem solving: A new assessment perspective. Applied Psychological Measurement, 36, 189–213.Google Scholar

Greiff, S., Wüstenberg, S., Molnár, G., Fischer, A., Funke, J., & Csapó, B. (2013b). Complex problem solving in educational contexts – Something beyond g: Concept, assessment, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 364–379.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., & Altmann, E. M. (2015). The role of placekeeping ability in fluid intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 1104–1110.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., Altmann, E. M., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2018). A knowledge activation approach to testing the circumvention-of-limits hypothesis. American Journal of Psychology, 131, 307–321.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., Altmann, E. M., Oswald, F. L., Meinz, E. J., Gobet, F., & Campitelli, G. (2014). Accounting for expert performance: The devil is in the details. Intelligence, 45, 112–114.Google Scholar

Hambrick, D. Z., Burgoyne, A. P., & Oswald, F. L. (in press). Domain-general models of expertise: The role of cognitive ability. In Ward, P., Schraagen, J. M., Gore, J., & Roth, E. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of expertise: Research and application. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. L., Shipstead, Z., Hicks, K. L., Hambrick, D. Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24, 2409–2419.Google Scholar

Hart, C. L., Taylor, M. D., Smith, G. D., Whalley, L. J., Starr, J. M., Hole, D. J., et al. (2003). Childhood IQ, social class, deprivation, and their relationships with mortality and morbidity risk in later life: Prospective observational study linking the Scottish Mental Survey 1932 and the Midspan studies. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 877–883.Google Scholar

Hays, W. L. (1988). Statistics (4th ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston Inc.Google Scholar

Hebb, D. O. (1942). The effect of early and late brain injury upon test scores, and the nature of normal adult intelligence. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 85, 275–292.Google Scholar

Henry, R. A., & Hulin, C. L. (1987). Stability of skilled performance across time: Some generalizations and limitations on utilities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 457–462.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (1996). Intelligence and job performance: Economic and social implications. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 447–472.Google Scholar

Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6829–6833.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. (1999). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Johnson, J., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416.Google Scholar

Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence are strongly related constructs: Comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005). Psychological Bulletin, 131, 66–71.Google Scholar

Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36, 153–160.Google Scholar

Kopiez, R., & Lee, J. (2006). Towards a dynamic model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 8, 97–120.Google Scholar

Kopiez, R., & Lee, J. (2008). Towards a general model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 10, 41–62.Google Scholar

Kretzschmar, A., Neubert, J. C., Wüstenberg, S., & Greiff, S. (2016). Construct validity of complex problem solving: A comprehensive view on different facets of intelligence and school grades. Intelligence, 54, 55–69.Google Scholar

Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 148–161.Google Scholar

Kuncel, N., & Sackett, P. (2018). The truth about the SAT and ACT. Wall Street Journal, March 8. www.wsj.com/articles/the-truth-about-the-sat-and-act-1520521861 Google Scholar

Kunda, M., Soulières, I., Rozga, A., & Goel, A. K. (2016). Error patterns on the Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Intelligence, 59, 181–198.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C. (2002). g: Knowledge, speed, strategies, or working-memory capacity? A systems perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. & Gigorenko, E. L. (Eds.), The general factor of intelligence: How general is it? (pp. 415–445). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D. (2009). Exceptional cognitive ability: The phenotype. Behavioral Genetics, 39, 350–358.Google Scholar

Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Moreau, D. (2016). How important is deliberate practice? Reply to Ericsson (2016). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 355–358.Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (2013). Problem solving. In Reisberg, D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 769–778). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McCabe, D. P., Roediger, H. L., McDaniel, M. A., Balota, D. A., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity, frontal lobe functioning, and general fluid intelligence: An adult lifespan study. Neuropsychology, 22, 638–644.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1–10.Google Scholar

Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291.Google Scholar

Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 512–534.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.Google Scholar

NBC Nightly News (2016). Lumosity to pay $2M over allegations that its ads deceived customers. January 5. www.youtube.com/watch?v=uw67Vf_EwAw&gl=UG&hl=en-GB Google Scholar

Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19(10), 957–961.Google Scholar

Postlethwaite, B., Robbins, S., Rickerson, J., & McKinniss, T. (2009). The moderation of conscientiousness by cognitive ability when predicting workplace safety behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 711–716.Google Scholar

Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 359–379.Google Scholar

Reeve, C. L., & Bonaccio, S. (2011). On the myth and the reality of the temporal validity degradation of general mental ability test scores. Intelligence, 39, 255–272.Google Scholar

Rosen, V. M., & Engle, R. W. (1998). Working memory capacity and suppression. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 418–436.Google Scholar

Ruthsatz, J., Detterman, D., Griscom, W. S., & Cirullo, B. A. (2008). Becoming an expert in the musical domain: It takes more than just practice. Intelligence, 36, 330–338.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A. (2000). Pressing issues in cognitive aging. In Park, D. & Swartz, N. (Eds.), Cognitive aging: A primer (pp. 43–54). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Salthouse, T. A., & Pink, J. E. (2008). Why is working memory related to fluid intelligence? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 364–371.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., Outerbridge, A. N., & Goff, S. (1988). Joint relation of experience and ability with job performance: Test of three hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 46–57.Google Scholar

Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., & Engle, R. W. (2016). Working memory capacity and fluid intelligence: Maintenance and disengagement. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 771–799.Google Scholar

Simons, D. J., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S. E., Chabris, C. F., Hambrick, D. Z., et al. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 103–186.Google Scholar

Sonnleitner, P., Keller, U., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2013). Students’ complex problem-solving abilities: Their structure and relations to reasoning ability and educational success. Intelligence, 41, 289–305.Google Scholar

Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–292.Google Scholar

Stadler, M., Becker, N., Gödker, M., Leutner, D., & Greiff, S. (2015). Complex problem solving and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 53, 92–101.Google Scholar

Stanford Center on Longevity (2014). A consensus on the brain training industry from the scientific community. http://longevity.stanford.edu/a-consensus-on-the-brain-training-industry-from-the-scientific-community-2 Google Scholar

Stern, W. (1914). The psychological methods of testing intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Warwick & York.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985a). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985b). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2008). Increasing fluid intelligence is possible after all. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 6791–6792.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People’s conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37–55.Google Scholar

Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.Google Scholar

Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127–154.Google Scholar

Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory capacity and fluid abilities: Examining the correlation between operation span and Raven. Intelligence, 33, 67–81.Google Scholar

Vernon, P. E. (1965). Ability factors and environmental influences. American Psychologist, 20, 723–733.Google Scholar

Walshe, E. A., McIntosh, C. W., Romer, R., & Winston, F. K. (2017). Executive function capacities, negative driving behavior and crashes in young adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14, E1314.Google Scholar

Wigdor, A., & Green, B. F. Jr. (1991). Performance assessment for the workplace, 2 vols. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Wüstenberg, S., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). Complex problem solving – More than reasoning? Intelligence, 40, 1–14.Google Scholar

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulates et axiomes de l’ecole américaine [Rational man’s behavior: Critique of the American School’s postulates and axioms]. Econometrica 21, 503–546.Google Scholar

Arkes, H. R., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2016). How bad is incoherence? Decision, 3, 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000043 Google Scholar

Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Berg, N. (2014). Success from satisficing and imitation: Entrepreneurs’ location choice and implications of heuristics for local economic development. Journal of Business Research, 67, 1700–1709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.02.016 Google Scholar

Berg, N., Biele, G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2016). Consistent Bayesians are no more accurate than non-Bayesians: Economists surveyed about PSA. Review of Behavioral Economics, 3, 189–219. https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000034 Google Scholar

Bernoulli, D. (1738/1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk. Econometrica, 22, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909829 Google Scholar

Boyd, R., & Richardson, P. J. (2005). The origin and evolution of cultures. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bröder, A. (2012). The quest for take-the-best. In Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & ABC Research Group, Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world (pp. 216–240). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, G. (2002). Embracing fatality through life insurance. In Baker, T. & Simon, J. (Eds.), Embracing risk: The changing culture of insurance and responsibility (pp. 80–96). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.Google Scholar

Daston, L. (1987). The domestication of risk: Mathematical probability and insurance 1650–1830. In Krüger, L., Daston, L., & Heidelberger, M. (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution, vol. 1, Ideas in history. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Daston, L. (1988). Classical probability in the Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Dawes, R. M. (1979). The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist, 34, 571–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571 Google Scholar

DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naïve diversification: How inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915 – 1953. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075 Google Scholar

Dhami, M. K. (2003). Psychological models of professional decision making. Psychological Science, 14, 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.01438 Google Scholar

Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). Psychological Review, 103, 592–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2014). Risk savvy: How to make good decisions. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2015). On the supposed evidence for libertarian paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6, 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2016). Towards a rational theory of heuristics. In Frantz, R. & Marsh, L. (Eds.), Minds, models, and milieux: Commemorating the centennial of the birth of Herbert Simon (pp. 34–59). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2018). The bias bias in behavioral economics. Review of Behavioral Economics, 5, 303–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000092 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Gaissmaier, W. (2011). Heuristic decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2017). Cassandra’s regret. The psychology of not wanting to know. Psychological Review, 124, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000055 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 104, 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650 Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. G. (2011). The recognition heuristic: A decade of research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 100–121.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., & Pachur, T. (Eds.) (2011). Heuristics: The foundations of adaptive behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group (1999). Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.75 Google Scholar

Green, L, & Mehr, D. R. (1997). What alters physicians’ decisions to admit to the coronary care unit? Journal of Family Practice, 45, 219–226.Google Scholar

Hamlin, R. P. (2017). “The gaze heuristic”: Biography of an adaptively rational decision process. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 264–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12253 Google Scholar

Hertwig, R., & Hoffrage, U. (2013). Simple heuristics: The foundations of adaptive social behavior. In Hertwig, R. & Hoffrage, U. (Eds.), Simple heuristics in a social world (pp. 3–36). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.019 Google Scholar

Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. G. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302, 1338–1339.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185 Google Scholar

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1996). On the reality of cognitive illusions. Psychological Review, 103, 582–591. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.582 Google Scholar

Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit, vol. 31. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Luan, S., Schooler, L., & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). A signal detection analysis of fast-and-frugal trees. Psychological Review, 118, 316–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022684 Google Scholar

Martignon, L., Vitouch, O., Takezawa, M., & Forster, M. R. (2003). Naive and yet enlightened: From natural frequencies to fast and frugal decision trees. In Hardman, D. & Macchi, L. (Eds.), Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making (pp. 189–211). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar

McBeath, M. K., Shafer, D. M., & Kaiser, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268, 569–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7725104 Google Scholar

Mischel, W. (2008). The toothbrush problem. Observer, 21(11). www.psychologicalscience.org/observer/the-toothbrush-problem Google Scholar

Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pohl, R. (2006). Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 251–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.522 Google Scholar

Schooler, L. J., & Hertwig, R. (2005). How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review, 112, 610–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.610 Google Scholar

Schwartz, B., Ward, A., Monterosso, J., Lyubomirsky, S., White, K., & Lehman, D. R. (2002). Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.5.1178 Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852 Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1979). Models of thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Simon, H. A. (1990). Invariants of human behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.000245 Google Scholar

Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 672–695.Google Scholar

Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & ABC Research Group (2012). Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Todd, P. M., & Miller, G. F. (1999). From pride and prejudice to persuasion: Realistic heuristics for mate search. In Gigerenzer, G., Todd, P. M., & ABC Research Group, Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 287–308). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031322 Google Scholar

Albus, J. S. (1991). Outline for a theory of intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(3), 473–509.Google Scholar

Ali, K., & Goel, A. (1996). Combining navigational planning and reactive control. Proceedings of the AAAI-96 Workshop on Reasoning About Actions, Planning and Control: Bridging the Gap (pp. 1–7). Portland: AAAI Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R. (2013). The adaptive character of thought. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Arkin, R. (1999). Behavior-based robotics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). Semantic web. Scientific American, 284(5), pp. 35–43.Google Scholar

Besold, T., Schlorlemmer, M., & Smaill, A. (Eds.) (2015) Computational creativity research: Towards creative machines. New York: Atlantis Press.Google Scholar

Boström, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bringsjord, S., & Schimanski, B. (2003). What is artificial intelligence? Psychometric AI as an answer. Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03) (pp. 887–893). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Buchanan, B., & Shortliffe, E. (1984). Rule based expert systems: The Mycin experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Boston: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

Cox, M., & Raja, A. (2011), Metareasoning: Thinking about thinking, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Davies, J., & Francis, A. G. (2013). The role of artificial intelligence research methods in cognitive science. In West, R. & Stewart, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 439–444). Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar

Evans, T. G. (1968). A program for the solution of a class of geometric-analogy intelligence-test questions. In Minsky, M. (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 271–353). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Ford, K., Hayes, P., Glymour, C., & Allen, J. (2015). Cognitive orthoses: Toward human-centered AI. AI Magazine, 36(4), 5–8.Google Scholar

Glasgow, J., Narayanan, N. H., & Chandrasekaran, B. (Eds.) (1995). Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Goel, A., Ali, K., Donnellan, M., Gomez, A., & Callantine, T. (1994). Multistrategy adaptive navigational path planning. IEEE Expert, 9(6), 57–65.Google Scholar

Goel, A., Stroulia, E., Chen, Z., & Rowland, P. (1997). Model-based reconfiguration of schema-based reactive control architectures. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Model-Directed Autonomous Systems (pp. 1–6). Cambridge, MA: AAAI.Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1992). The Turing test is not a trick: Turing indistinguishability is a scientific criterion. SIGART Bulletin, 3(4), 9–10.Google Scholar

Hsu, F., Campbell, M., & Hoane, A. (1995). Deep Blue system overview. In Wolfe, M. (Ed.), Procs. the 1995 International Conference on Supercomputing (pp. 240–244).New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar

Kotseruba, I., Gonzalez, O., & Tsotsos, J. (2016). A review of 40 years of cognitive architecture research: Focus on perception, attention, learning and applications. The Computing Research Repository (CoRR). arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.08602, 1–74.Google Scholar

Kunda, M., McGreggor, K., & Goel, A. (2013). A computational model for solving problems from the Raven’s Progressive Matrices intelligence test using iconic visual representations. Cognitive Systems Research, 22, 47–66.Google Scholar

Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking Adult.Google Scholar

Laird, J. E. (2012). The Soar cognitive architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar

Laird, J. E., Lebiere, C., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2017). A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. AI Magazine, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i4.2744 Google Scholar

Laird, J., Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. (1987). Soar: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33, 1–64.Google Scholar

Langley, P. (2012). The cognitive systems paradigm. Advances in Cognitive Systems, 1, 3–13.Google Scholar

Langley, P., Laird, J., & Rogers, S. (2009). Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 141–160.Google Scholar

LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436–444.Google Scholar

Lenat, D., & Guha, R. (1990). Building large knowledge based systems: Representation and inference in the Cyc project. Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar

Lindsay, R., Buchanan, B., Feigenbaum, E., & Lederberg, J. (1980). Applications of artificial intelligence for chemical inference: The Dendral project. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Marcus, G., Rossi, F., & Veloso, M. (2016). Beyond the Turing test. Special issue, AI Magazine, 37(1), 3–101.Google Scholar

Marr, D. (1982). Vision. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J. (1988). Mathematical logic in AI. Daedalus, 117(1), 297–311.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J., Minsky, M., Rochester, N., & Shannon, C. (1955/2006). A proposal for the Dartmouth summer research project on artificial intelligence. AI Magazine, 27(4), 12–14.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L., Rumelhart, D. E., & PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 2, Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. L. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In Winston, P. H. (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 1–82). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Minsky, M. L., & Papert, S. A. (1969). Perceptrons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Mitchell, M. (1998). An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Elements of a theory of problem solving. Psychological Review, 63(3), 151–166.Google Scholar

Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kauffman.Google Scholar

Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason. Science, humanism, and progress. New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Quillian, M. (1968). Semantic Memory. In Minsky, M. (Ed.), Semantic information processing (pp. 227–270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Rabiner, L., & Juang, B. H. (1986). An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Magazine, January, 4–16.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part V - Intelligence and Information Processing

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References