Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T16:55:22.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Unpacking the Structures of Team Interaction Patterns

from Part II - Application Areas of Interaction Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2018

Elisabeth Brauner
Affiliation:
Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Margarete Boos
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Michaela Kolbe
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliese, P. D., & Ployhart, R. E. (2002). Growth modeling using random coefficient models: Model building, testing, and illustrations. Organizational Research Methods, 5, 362387. doi:10.1177/109442802237116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boos, M., Pritz, J., Lange, S., & Belz, M. (2014). Leadership in moving human groups. PLoS Computational Biology, 10(4), e1003541. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003541Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 321. doi:10.1007/BF00988593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences in geographically dispersed teams, Organization Science, 12, 346371. doi.10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronin, M. A., Weingart, L. R., & Todorova, G. (2011). Dynamics in groups: Are we there yet? The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 571612. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.590297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization science, 5(2), 121147. doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, J., Workman, K., & Hardin, A. (2014). Compassion at Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 277304. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 2343. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, A. C., & McManus, S. E. (2007). Methodological fit in management field research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 12461264. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.26586086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In Devine, P., & Plant, A. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 47 (pp. 154). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gevers, J. M., van Eerde, W., & Roe, R. (2014). The relevance of time in organizations and organizational studies: Introduction to the special issue. Gedrag & Organisatie, 27(1), 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, C. B. (2017). Elaboration, generalization, triangulation, and interpretation: On enhancing the value of mixed method research. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 193223. doi:10.1177/1094428116639133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, D. R. (2003). Participation shifts: Order and differentiation in group conversation. Social Forces, 81, 13351381. doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, D. R. (2005). Taking turns and talking ties: Network structure and conversational sequences. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 15611597. doi:10.1086/428689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hackman, J. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd edn.), New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130158. doi:10.1177/1046496411429599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffeld, S., & Meyers, R. A. (2009). Complaint and solution-oriented circles in work groups. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18, 267294. doi:10.1080/13594320701693209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In Cassell, C. & Symon, G. (Eds.) Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT – A framework for observing coordination behavior in acute care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 596605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M. & Spahn, D. R. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: Autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 12541267. doi:10.1037/a0037877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270299. doi:10.1177/2041386614533586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2008). Team learning, development, and adaptation. In Sessa, V.I. & Lonson, M. (Eds.), Work group learning (pp. 15–44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J. & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 390). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Chiu, M. M., Lei, Z., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). Understanding positivity within dynamic team interactions. Group & Organization Management, 42(1), 3978. doi:10.1177/1059601116628720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meyers, R. A., Kauffeld, S., Neininger, A., & Henschel, A. (2011). Verbal interaction sequences and group mood: Exploring the role of planning communication. Small Group Research, 42, 639668. doi:10.1177/1046496411398397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, Z., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2015). Affect in meetings: An interpersonal construct in dynamic interaction processes. In Allen, J. A., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Rogelberg, S. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 456482). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, Z., Waller, M. J., Hagen, J., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Team adaptiveness in dynamic contexts: Contextualizing the roles of interaction patterns and in-process planning. Group & Organization Management, 41(4), 491525. doi:10.1177/1059601115615246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, M. S. (2016). Time and self-similar structure in behavior and interactions: From sequences to symmetry and fractals. In Magnusson, M. S. et al. (Eds.), Discovering Hidden Temporal Patterns in Behavior and Interaction: T-Pattern Detection and Analysis with THEME™, 335. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, M. S. (2017). Why search for hidden repeated temporal behavior patterns: T-pattern analysis with theme. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapy, 2, 128. https://doi.org/10.15344/2017/2456-3501/128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, P. (2010). INTERACT quick start manual V2. 4. www.mangold-international.com.Google Scholar
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356376. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, J. E., Marks, M. A., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In Anderson, N., Ones, D., Sinangil, H. K., & Viswesvaran, C. (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289313). London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473492. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. E., & Tschan, F. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology: Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Perlow, L., Gittell, J. H., Katz, N. (2004). Contextualizing patterns of work group interaction: Toward a nested theory of structuration. Organization Science, 15(5), 520536. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picard, R. W., Vyzas, E., & Healey, J. (2001). Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23, 11751191. doi:10.1109/34.954607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poh, M., Swenson, N. C., & Picard, R. W. (2010). A wearable sensor for unobtrusive, long-term assessment of electrodermal activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57, 12431252. doi:10.1109/TBME.2009.2038487Google ScholarPubMed
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd edn.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Ripley, R., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2009). Manual for SIENA Version 4.0. Department of Statistics, Nufield College, University of Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Riethmüller, M., Fernandez, C. E., Eberhardt, I., Timmermann, A., & Boos, M. (2012). Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: a longitudinal study. Ergonomics, 55(1), 5568. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.636455CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneeweiss, S. (2014). Learning from big health care data. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(23), 21612163. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1401111CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulte, M., Cohen, N. A., & Klein, K. J. (2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564581. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In Carrington, P. J., Scott, J., Wasserman, S. (Eds)., Models in social network analysis (pp. 215247). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the co-evolution of networks and behavior. In van Montfort, K., Oud, H., Satorra, A. (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 4171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316325. doi:10.2307/3069458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stachowski, A. A., Kaplan, S. A., & Waller, M. J. (2009). The benefits of flexible team interaction during crises. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 15361543. doi:10.1037/a0016903CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sterman, J. D. (1989). Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 301335. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(89)90041-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoolmiller, M., Eddy, J. M., & Reid, J. B. (2000). Detecting and describing preventive intervention effects in a universally school-based randomized trial targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(2), 296306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, R. J., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Milanovich, D. M. (1999). Planning, shared mental models, and coordinated performance: An empirical link is established. Human Factors, 41(1), 6171. doi:10.1518/001872099779577273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tröster, C., Mehra, A., & van Knippenberg, D.. (2014). Structuring for team success: the interactive effects of network structure and cultural diversity on team potency and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 124, 245255. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, M. J., & Kaplan, S. (2016). Systematic behavioral observation for emergent team phenomena: Key considerations for quantitative video-based approaches. Organizational Research Methods. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1094428116647785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, M. J., Lei, Z., & Pratten, R. (2014). Focusing on teams in crisis management education: An integration and simulation-based approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 208221. doi:10.5465/amle.2012.0337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Vol. 8. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingart, L. R. (2012). Studying dynamics within groups. In Neale, M. A. & Mannix, E. A. (Eds.), Looking back, moving forward: A review of group and team-based research (pp. 1–25). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
Zellmer-Bruhn, M., Waller, M. J., & Ancona, D. (2004). The effect of temporal entrainment on the ability of teams to change their routines. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Press.Google Scholar
Zijlstra, F. R. H., Waller, M. J., & Phillips, S. I. (2012). Setting the tone: Early interaction patterns in swift-starting teams as a predictor of effectiveness. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 749777. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×