Nonhuman Primate Sexual Behavior

doi:10.1017/9781108943581.017

Part III - Nonhuman Primate Sexual Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 June 2022

Edited by

Todd K. Shackelford

Show author details

Todd K. Shackelford: Affiliation:
Oakland University, Michigan

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Evolutionary Perspectives on Sexual Psychology , pp. 353 - 560

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108943581.017 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altmann, S. A. (1962). A field study of the sociobiology of rhesus monkeys, Macaca mulatta. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 102, 338–435.Google Scholar

Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection (Vol. 72). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Arcadi, A. C., & Wrangham, R. W. (1999). Infanticide in chimpanzees: Review of cases and a new within-group observation from the Kanyawara study group in Kibale National Park. Primates, 40(2), 337–351.CrossRef Google Scholar

Boesch, C. (1996). Social grouping in Taï chimpanzees. In McGrew, W., Nishida, T., & Marchant, L. (Eds.), Great apes societies (pp. 101–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Boesch, C., & Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000). The chimpanzees of the Taï forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boesch, C., Kohou, G., Néné, H., & Vigilant, L. (2006). Male competition and paternity in wild chimpanzees of the Taï forest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 130(1), 103–115.Google Scholar

Boesch, C., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Chimpanzee and human cultures. Current Anthropology, 39, 591614.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Harvey, P. H. (Ed.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 195–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cox, C. R., & Le Boeuf, B. J. (1977). Female incitation of male competition: a mechanism in sexual selection. The American Naturalist, 111(978), 317–335.CrossRef Google Scholar

Daly, M. (1978). The cost of mating. The American Naturalist, 112(986), 771–774.CrossRef Google Scholar

Deschner, T., Heistermann, M., Hodges, K., & Boesch, C. (2003). Timing and probability of ovulation in relation to sex skin swelling in wild West African chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes verus. Animal Behavior 66, 551–560.Google Scholar

Deschner, T., Heistermann, M., Hodges, K., & Boesch, C. (2004). Female sexual swelling size, timing of ovulation, and male behavior in wild West African chimpanzees. Hormones and Behavior, 46(2), 204–215.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dixson, A. F., & Mundy, N. I. (1994). Sexual behavior, sexual swelling, and penile evolution in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(3), 267–280.Google Scholar

Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among non-human animals: a cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257–333.CrossRef Google Scholar

Emery, T. M. (2005). Reproductive endocrinology of wild female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii): Methodological considerations and the role of hormones in sex and conception. American Journal of Primatology, 67(1), 137–158.CrossRef Google Scholar

Emery, M. A., & Whitten, P. L. (2003). Size of sexual swellings reflects ovarian function in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 54, 340–351.Google Scholar

Gilby, I. C., Thompson, M. E., Ruane, J. D., & Wrangham, R. (2010). No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 59(1), 44–53.Google Scholar

Gomes, C. M., & Boesch, C. (2009). Wild chimpanzees exchange meat for sex on a long-term basis. PLOS ONE, 4(4), e5116.Google Scholar

Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar

Hamai, M., Nishida, T., Takasaki, H., & Turner, L. A. (1992). New records of within-group infanticide and cannibalism in wild chimpanzees. Primates, 33(2), 151–162.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hasegawa, T., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. (1983). Opportunistic and restrictive matings among wild chimpanzees in the Mahale mountains, Tanzania. Journal of Ethology, 1, 75–85.Google Scholar

Harvey, P. H., & May, R. M. (1989). Out for the sperm count. Nature 337, 508–509.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, T., & Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. (1983). Opportunistic and restrictive matings among wild chimpanzees in the Mahale mountains, Tanzania. Journal of Etholology, 1, 75–85.Google Scholar

Hasegawa, T., & Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. (1990). Sperm competition and mating behavior. In Nishida, T. (Ed.), The chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains (pp. 115–132). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1979). Infanticide among animals: A review, classification, and examination of the implications for the reproductive strategies of females. Ethology and Sociobiology, 1(1), 13–40.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman that never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1988). The primate origins of human sexuality. In Bellig, R. & Stevens, G. (Eds.), The evolution of sex (pp. 101–136). San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B., & Whitten, P. L. (1987). Patterning of sexual activity. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., & Struhsaker, T. T. (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 370–384). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, C. O. (2009). Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science, 326(5949), 74–74e8.Google Scholar

Lindburg, D. G. (1971). The rhesus monkey in North India: An ecological and behavioral study. Primate Behavior: Developments in Field and Laboratory Research, 2, 1–106.Google Scholar

Nishida, T. (1979). The social structure of chimpanzees in the Mahale mountains. In Hamburg, D. A. & McCown, E. (Eds.), The great apes (pp. 73–122). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings.Google Scholar

Nishida, T. (1997). Sexual behavior of adult male chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. Primates, 38(4), 379–398.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nunn, C. L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 58, 229–246.Google Scholar

McGinnis, P. R. (1973). Patterns of sexual behaviour in a community of free-living chimpanzees (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge).Google Scholar

McGrew, W. C. (1992). Chimpanzee material culture: Implications for human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Matsumoto-Oda, A., & Oda, R. (1998). Changes in the activity budget of cycling female chimpanzees. American Journal of Primatology, 46, 157–166.Google Scholar

Matsumoto-Oda, A. (1999). Female choice in the opportunistic mating of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Mahale. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46, 258–266.Google Scholar

Milton, K. (1985). Mating patterns of woolly spider monkeys, Brachyteles arachnoides: Implications for female choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 17(1), 53–59.Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C., & Watts, D. P. (2005). Correlates of territorial boundary patrol behaviour in wild chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 70(5), 1079–1086.Google Scholar

Morin, P. A. (1993). Reproductive strategies in chimpanzees. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36(S17), 179–212.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N. (2002). Agonistic relations among Kanyawara chimpanzees. In Boesch, C., Hohmann, G., & Marchant, L. F. (Eds.), Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos (pp. 112–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., Kahlenberg, S. M., Emery Thompson, M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2007). Male coercion and the costs of promiscuous mating for female chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1612), 1009–1014.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., Thompson, M. E., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2011). Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(5), 921–933.Google Scholar

Nishida, T. (1979). The social structure of chimpanzees of the Mahale Mountains. In Hamburg, D. A. & McCown, E. R. (Eds.), The great apes (pp. 73–121). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.Google Scholar

Nishida, T., Corp, N., Hamai, M., Hasegawa, T., Hiraiwa‐Hasegawa, M., Hosaka, K., … & Zamma, K. (2003). Demography, female life history, and reproductive profiles among the chimpanzees of Mahale. American Journal of Primatology: Official Journal of the American Society of Primatologists, 59(3), 99–121.Google Scholar

Nishida, T., Takasaki, H., & Takahata, Y. (1990). Demography and reproductive profiles. In Nishida, T. (Ed.), The chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains (pp. 63–97). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Pagel, M. (1994). The evolution of conspicuous oestrous advertisement in Old World monkeys. Animal Behaviour, 47, 1333–1341.Google Scholar

Pilbeam, D. (1996). Genetic and morphological records of the Hominoidea and hominid origins: A synthesis. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 5(1), 155–168.Google Scholar

Pradhan, G., Engelhard, A., van Schaik, C. P., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). The evolution of female copulation calls in primates: A review and a new model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 333–343.Google Scholar

Pusey, A., Williams, J., & Goodall, J. (1997). The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees. Science, 277(5327), 828–831.Google Scholar

Ransom, T. W., & Ransom, B. S. (1971). Adult male-infant relations among baboons (Papio anubis). Folia Primatologica, 16(3–4), 179–195.Google Scholar

Reynolds, V. (2005). The chimpanzees of the Budongo forest: Ecology, behaviour and conservation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rogers, C. M., & Davenport, R. K. (1969). Effects of restricted rearing on sexual behavior of chimpanzees. Developmental Psychology, 1(3), 200.Google Scholar

Small, M. F. (1990) Promiscuity in barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). American Journal of Primatology, 20, 267–282.Google Scholar

Smuts, B. B. (1987). Sexual competition and mate choice. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., & Struhsaker, T. T. (Eds.), Primate Societies (pp. 385–399). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22(22), 1–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stanford, C. B. (1996). The hunting ecology of wild chimpanzees: Implications for the evolutionary ecology of Pliocene hominids. American Anthropologist, 98(1), 96–113.Google Scholar

Stumpf, R. M., & Boesch, C. (2005). Does promiscuous mating preclude female choice? Female sexual strategies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) of the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 57(5), 511–524.Google Scholar

Takasaki, H. (1985). Female life history and mating patterns among the M group chimpanzees of the Mahale National Park, Tanzania. Primates, 26(2), 121–129.Google Scholar

Townsend, S. W., & Zuberbuhler, K. (2009). Audience effects in chimpanzee copulation calls. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(3), 282–284.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Tutin, C. E. (1979). Mating patterns and reproductive strategies in a community of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 29–38.Google Scholar

Tutin, C. E. (1980). Reproductive behaviour of wild chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement, 28, 43–57.Google Scholar

Tutin, C. E. G., & McGinnis, P. R. (1981). Chimpanzee reproduction in the wild. In Graham, C. E. (Ed.), Reproductive biology of the great apes: Comparative and biomedical perspectives (pp. 239–264). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

van Lawick-Goodall, J. (1968). The behaviour of free-living chimpanzees in the Gombe Stream Reserve. Animal Behaviour Monographs, 1, 161–311.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., Hodges, J. K., & Nunn, C. L. (2000). Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates. In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H., (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 361–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., van Nordwijk, M. A., & Nunn, C. L. (1999). Sex and social evolution in primates. In Lee, P. C. (Ed.), Comparative primate socio-ecology (pp. 204–231). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M. (1939). Sexual behavior in the chimpanzee. Human Biology, 11(1), 78.Google Scholar

Yerkes, R. M., & Elder, J. H. (1936). Oestrus, receptivity, and mating in chimpanzee. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 13, 1–39.Google Scholar

Wallis, J. (1982). Sexual behavior of captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): pregnant versus cycling females. American Journal of Primatology, 3, 77–88.Google Scholar

Wallis, J. (1992). Chimpanzee genital swelling and its role in the pattern of sociosexual behavior. American Journal of Primatology, 28(2), 101–113.Google Scholar

Wallis, J., & Lemmon, W. B. (1986). Social behavior and genital swelling in pregnant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). American Journal of Primatology, 10(2), 171–183.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Watts, D. P. (1998). Coalitionary mate guarding by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park. Uganda Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 44(1), 43–55.Google Scholar

Watts, D. P. (2015). Mating behavior of adolescent male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Primates, 56(2), 163–172.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (2002). The cost of sexual attraction: Is there a tradeoff in female Pan between sex appeal and received coercion? In Boesch, C., Hohmann, G., & Marchant, L. (Eds.), Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos (pp. 204–215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W., & Smuts, B. B. (1980). Sex differences in the behavioural ecology of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement, 28, 13–31.Google Scholar

Wroblewski, E. E., Murray, C. M., Keele, B. F., Schumacher-Stankey, J. C., Hahn, B. H., & Pusey, A. E. (2009). Male dominance rank and reproductive success in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii. Animal Behaviour, 77(4), 873–885.Google Scholar

Zinner, D., Nunn, C. L., van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M., (2004). Sexual selection and exaggerated sexual swellings of female primates. In Kappeler, P. M. & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 71–89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Alcock, J. (1987). Ardent adaptation. Journal of Natural History, 96, 4.Google Scholar

Annicchiarico, G., Bertini, M., Cordoni, G., & Palagi, E. (2020). Look at me while having sex! Eye-to-eye contact affects homosexual behaviour in bonobo females. Behaviour, 1–22.Google Scholar

Bancroft, J. (2005). The endocrinology of sexual arousal. Journal of Endocrinology, 186(3), 411.Google Scholar

Berridge, K. C. (2018). Evolving concepts of emotion and motivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1647.Google Scholar

Bliss-Moreau, E. (2017). Constructing nonhuman animal emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 184–188.Google Scholar

Blount, B. G. (1990). Issues in bonobo (Pan paniscus) sexual behavior. American Anthropologist, 92, 702–714.Google Scholar

Borrow, A. P., & Cameron, N. M. (2012). The role of oxytocin in mating and pregnancy. Hormones and Behavior, 61(3), 266–276.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Cabanac, M. (1971). Physiological role of pleasure. Science, 173(4002), 1103.Google Scholar

Chevalier-Skolnikoff, S. (1974). Male–female, female–female, and male–male sexual behavior in the stumptail monkey, with special attention to the female orgasm. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 3, 95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Clay, Z., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2015). Sex and strife: Post-conflict sexual contacts in bonobos. Behaviour, 152, 313–334.Google Scholar

Clay, Z., Pika, S., Gruber, T., & Zuberbühler, K. (2011). Female bonobos use copulation calls as social signals. Biology Letters, 7(4), 513–516.Google Scholar

Clay, Z., & Zuberbühler, K. (2011). The structure of bonobo copulation calls during reproductive and non-reproductive sex. Ethology, 117(12), 1158–1169.Google Scholar

Clay, Z., & Zuberbühler, K. (2012). Communication during sex among female bonobos: Effects of dominance, solicitation and audience. Scientific Reports, 2(1), 291.Google Scholar

Crespi, B. J. (2016). Oxytocin, testosterone, and human social cognition. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 91(2), 390–408.Google Scholar

Dahl, J. F. (1985). The external genitalia of female pygmy chimpanzees. The Anatomical Record, 211(1), 24–28.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (1987). Tension regulation and nonreproductive functions of sex in captive bonobos (Pan paniscus). National Geographic Research, 3(3), 318–335.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (1990). Sociosexual behavior used for tension regulation in all age and sex combinations among bonobos. In Feierman, J. R. (Ed.), Pedophilia (pp. 378–393). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (1995). Bonobo sex and society. Scientific American, 272(3), 82–88.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (1997). Bonobo: The forgotten ape. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

de Waal, F. B. M. (2019). Mama’s last hug. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Douglas, P. H., Hohmann, G., Murtagh, R., Thiessen-Bock, R., & Deschner, T. (2016). Mixed messages: Wild female bonobos show high variability in the timing of ovulation in relation to sexual swelling patterns. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 16, 140.Google Scholar

Douglas, P. H., & Moscovice, L. R. (2015). Pointing and pantomime in wild apes? Female bonobos use referential and iconic gestures to request genito-genital rubbing. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 13999.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Emery Thompson, M., Stumpf, R. M., & Pusey, A. E. (2008). Female reproductive strategies and competition in apes: An introduction. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 815–821.Google Scholar

Enomoto, T. (1990). Social play and sexual behavior of the bonobo (Pan paniscus) with special reference to flexibility. Primates, 31(4), 469–480.Google Scholar

Fedurek, P., & Lehmann, J. (2017). The effect of excluding juveniles on apparent adult olive baboons (Papio anubis) social networks. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0173146.Google Scholar

Fleischman, D. S. (2016). An evolutionary behaviorist perspective on orgasm. Socioaffective Neuroscience Psychology, 6, 32130.Google Scholar

Fox, C. A., Wolff, H. S., & Baker, J. A. (1970). Measurement of intravaginal and intra-uterine pressures during human coitus by radio-telemetry. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 22, 243–251.Google Scholar

Fruth, B., & Hohmann, G. (2002). How bonobos handle hunts and harvests: Why share food? In Boesch, C., Hohmann, G., & Marchant, L. F. (Eds.), Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos (pp. 231–243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fruth, B., & Hohmann, G. (2006). Social grease for females? Same-sex genital contacts in wild bonobos. In Sommer, V. & Vasey, P. L. (Eds.), Homosexual behaviour in animals: An evolutionary perspective (pp. 294–315). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Furuichi, T. (1987). Sexual swelling, receptivity, and grouping of wild pygmy chimpanzee females at Wamba, Zaïre. Primates, 28(3), 309–318.Google Scholar

Furuichi, T. (1989). Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wamba, Zaire. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 173–197.Google Scholar

Furuichi, T. (2011). Female contributions to the peaceful nature of bonobo society. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20, 131–142.Google Scholar

Furuichi, T. (2019). Bonobo and chimpanzee: The lessons of social coexistence. Springer Nature. New York: Springer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Furuichi, T., Connor, R., & Hashimoto, C. (2014). Non-conceptive sexual interactions in monkeys, apes, and dolphins. In Yamagiwa, J. & Karczmarski, L. (Eds.), Primates and cetaceans. Primatology monographs (pp. 385–408). Tokyo: Springer.Google Scholar

Furuichi, T., & Hashimoto, C. (2002). Why female bonobos have a lower copulation rate during estrus than chimpanzees. In Boesch, C., Hohmann, G. & Marchant, L. (Eds.), Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos (pp. 156–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Furuichi, T., & Hashimoto, C. (2004). Sex differences in copulation attempts in wild bonobos at Wamba. Primates, 45, 59–62.Google Scholar

Furuichi, T., & Ihobe, H. (1994). Variation in male relationships in bonobos and chimpanzees. Behaviour, 130, 212–228.Google Scholar

Gangestad, S. W., & Grebe, N. M. (2017). Hormonal systems, human social bonding, and affiliation. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 122–135.Google Scholar

Genty, E., Neumann, C., & Zuberbühler, K. (2015). Complex patterns of signalling to convey different social goals of sex in bonobos (Pan paniscus). Scientific Reports, 5, 16135.Google Scholar

Gesquiere, L. R., Wango, E. O., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2007). Mechanisms of sexual selection: Sexual swellings and estrogen concentrations as fertility indicators and cues for male consort decisions in wild baboons. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 114–125.Google Scholar

Goldstone, L. G., Sommer, V., Nurmi, N., Stephens, C., & Fruth, B. (2016). Food begging and sharing in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus): Assessing relationship quality? Primates, 57(3), 367–376.Google Scholar

Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gruber, T., & Clay, Z. (2016). A comparison between bonobos and chimpanzees: A review and update. Evolutionary Anthropology, 25, 239–252.Google Scholar

Gruber, T., Clay, Z., & Zuberbühler, K. (2010). A comparison of bonobo and chimpanzee tool use: Evidence for a female bias in the Pan lineage. Animal Behaviour, 80, 1023–1033.Google Scholar

Hare, B., & Kwetuenda, S. (2010). Bonobos voluntarily share their own food with others. Current Biology, 20, R230–R231.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hare, B., Melis, A. P., Woods, V., Hastings, S., & Wrangham, R. (2007). Tolerance allows bonobos to outperform chimpanzees on a cooperative task. Current Biology, 17(7), 619–623.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, C. (1997). Context and development of sexual behavior of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Wamba, Zaire. International Journal of Primatology, 18(1), 1–21.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, C., & Furuichi, T. (1994). Social role and development of noncopulatory sexual behavior of wild bonobos. In Wrangham, R., McGrew, W. C., de Waal, F. B. M., & Heltne, P. G. (Eds.), Chimpanzee cultures (pp. 155–168). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, C., & Furuichi, T. (2006a). Comparison of behavioral sequence of copulation between chimpanzees and bonobos. Primates, 47, 51–55.Google Scholar

Hashimoto, C., & Furuichi, T. (2006b). Frequent copulations by females and high promiscuity in chimpanzees in the Kalinzu Forest, Uganda. In Newton-Fisher, N. E., Notman, H., Paterson, J. D., & Reynolds, V. (Eds.), Primates of western Uganda. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Heinrichs, M., Baumgartner, T., Kirschbaum, C., & Ehlert, U. (2003). Social support and oxytocin interact to suppress cortisol and subjective responses to psychosocial stress. Biological Psychiatry, 54(12), 1389–1398.Google Scholar

Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2000). Use and function of genital contacts among female bonobos. Animal Behaviour, 60, 107–120.Google Scholar

Hohmann, G., & Fruth, B. (2003). Intra- and inter-sexual aggression by bonobos in the context of mating. Behaviour, 140, 1389–1413.Google Scholar

Hohmann, G., Mundry, R., & Deschner, T. (2009). The relationship between socio-sexual behavior and salivary cortisol in bonobos: Tests of the tension regulation hypothesis. American Journal of Primatology, 71, 223–232.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1996). The evolution of female orgasms: Logic please but no atavism. Animal Behaviour, 52(4), 851–852.CrossRef Google Scholar

Idani, G. (1991). Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folia Primatologica, 57, 83–95.Google Scholar

Kahlenberg, S. M., Thompson, M. E., Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2008). Immigration costs for female chimpanzees and male protection as an immigrant counterstrategy to intrasexual aggression. Animal Behaviour, 76, 1497–1509.Google Scholar

Kano, T. (1980). Social behaviour of wild pygmy chimpanzees (Pan paniscus) of Wamba: A preliminary report. Journal of Human Evolution, 9, 243–260.Google Scholar

Kano, T. (1992). The last ape: Pygmy chimpanzee behavior and ecology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Kitamura, K. (1989). Genito-genital contacts in the pygmy chimpanzee (Pan paniscus). African Studies Monographs, 10, 49–67.Google Scholar

Kret, M. E., Prochazkova, E., Sterck, E. H. M., & Clay, Z. (2020). Emotional expressions in human and non-human great apes. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 115, 378–395.Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. (2012). Rethinking the emotional brain. Neuron, 73, 653–676.Google Scholar

Lodé, T. (2020). A brief natural history of the orgasm. Frontiers in Life Science, 13, 34–44.Google Scholar

Mori, A. (1984). An ecological study of pygmy chimpanzees in Wamba, Zaire: A comparison with chimpanzees. Primates, 25, 255–278.Google Scholar

Moscovice, L. R., Deschner, T., & Hohmann, G. (2015). Welcome back: Responses of female bonobos (Pan paniscus) to fusions. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0127305.Google Scholar

Moscovice, L. R., Douglas, P. H., Martinez-Iñigo, L., Surbeck, M., Vigilant, L., & Hohmann, G. (2017). Stable and fluctuating social preferences and implications for cooperation among female bonobos at LuiKotale, Salonga National Park, DRC. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 163(1), 158–172.Google Scholar

Moscovice, L. R., Surbeck, M., Fruth, B., Hohmann, G., Jaeggi, A. V., & Deschner, T. (2019). The cooperative sex: Sexual interactions among female bonobos are linked to increases in oxytocin, proximity and coalitions. Hormones and Behavior, 116, 104581.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2009). Male aggression against females and sexual coercion in chimpanzees. In Muller, M. & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans: an evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females (pp. 184–217). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2004). Dominance, cortisol and stress in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55(4), 332–340.Google Scholar

Nunn, C. L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 58, 229–246.Google Scholar

Nurmi, N. O., Hohmann, G., Goldstone, L. G., Deschner, T., & Schülke, O. (2018). The “tolerant chimpanzee” – towards the costs and benefits of sociality in female bonobos. Behavioral Ecology, 29(6), 1325–1339.Google Scholar

Panksepp, J. (2011a). The basic emotional circuits of mammalian brains: Do animals have affective lives? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(9), 1791–1804.Google Scholar

Panksepp, J. (2011b). Cross-species affective neuroscience decoding of the primal affective experiences of humans and related animals. PLOS ONE, 6(9), e21236.Google Scholar

Paoli, T., Palagi, E., Tacconi, G., & Borgognini Tarli, S. (2006). Perineal swelling, intermenstrual cycle, and female sexual behavior in bonobos (Pan paniscus). American Journal of Primatology, 68, 333–347.Google Scholar

Parish, A. R. (1994). Sex and food control in the “uncommon chimpanzee”: How bonobo females overcome a phylogenetic legacy of male dominance. Ethology & Sociobiology, 15(3), 157–179.Google Scholar

Pradhan, G. R., Engelhardt, A., van Schaik, C. P., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). The evolution of female copulation calls in primates: A review and a new model. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(3), 333–343.Google Scholar

Prause, N. (2011). The human female orgasm: Critical evaluations of proposed psychological sequelae. Sexual Relationship Therapy, 26, 315–328.Google Scholar

Ryu, H., Hill, D. A., & Furuichi, T. (2015). Prolonged maximal sexual swelling in wild bonobos facilitates affiliative interactions between females. Behaviour, 152, 285–311.Google Scholar

Sakamaki, T., Behncke, I., Laporte, M. N. C., Mulavwa, M., Ryu, H., Takemoto, H., … & Furuichi, T. (2015). Intergroup transfer of females and social relationships between immigrants and residents in Bonobo (Pan paniscus) societies. In Furuichi, T., Yamagiwa, J., & Aureli, F. (Eds.), Dispersing primate females: Life history and social strategies in male-philopatric species (pp. 127–164). Tokyo: Springer Japan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sander, D. (2013). Models of emotion: The affective neuroscience approach handbook of human affective neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Silk, J. B. (2009). Nepotistic cooperation in non-human primate groups. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3243–3254.Google Scholar

Smuts, B. B., & Watanabe, J. M. (1990). Social relationships and ritualized greetings in adult male baboons (Papio cynocephalus anubis). International Journal of Primatology, 11(2), 147–172.Google Scholar

Soares, M. C., Bshary, R., Fusani, L., Goymann, W., Hau, M., Hirschenhauser, K., & Oliveira, R. F. (2010). Hormonal mechanisms of cooperative behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1553), 2737–2750.Google Scholar

Stanford, C. B. (1998). The social behavior of chimpanzees and bonobos. Current Anthropology, 39, 4.Google Scholar

Stumpf, R. (2007). Chimpanzees and bonobos: Diversity within and between species. In Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., & Bearder, S. K. (Eds.), Primates in perspective (pp. 321–344). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Surbeck, M., Boesch, C., Crockford, C., Thompson, M. E., Furuichi, T., Fruth, B., … & Langergraber, K. (2019). Males with a mother living in their group have higher paternity success in bonobos but not chimpanzees. Current Biology, 29(10), R354–R355.Google Scholar

Surbeck, M., Deschner, T., Schubert, G., Weltring, A., & Hohmann, G. (2012). Mate competition, testosterone and intersexual relationships in bonobos, Pan paniscus. Animal Behaviour, 83(3), 659–669.Google Scholar

Surbeck, M., & Hohmann, G. (2013). Intersexual dominance relationships and the influence of leverage on the outcome of conflicts in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus). Behavioral Ecology Sociobiology, 67, 1767–1780.CrossRef Google Scholar

Surbeck, M., Langergraber, K. E., Fruth, B., Vigilant, L., & Hohmann, G. (2017). Male reproductive skew is higher in bonobos than chimpanzees. Current Biology, 27(13), R640–R641.Google Scholar

Surbeck, M., Mundry, R., & Hohmann, G. (2011). Mothers matter! Maternal support, dominance status and mating success in male bonobos (Pan paniscus). Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1705), 590–598.Google Scholar

Takahata, Y., Ihobe, H., & Idani, G. (1996). Comparing copulations of chimpanzees and bonobos: do females exhibit proceptivity or receptivity? In McGrew, W. C., Marchant, L. F., & Nishida, T. (Eds.), Great ape societies (pp. 146–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tokuyama, N., & Furuichi, T. (2016). Do friends help each other? Patterns of female coalition formation in wild bonobos at Wamba. Animal Behaviour, 119, 27–35.Google Scholar

Townsend, S. W., Deschner, T., & Zuberbühler, K. (2008). Female chimpanzees use copulation calls flexibly to prevent social competition. PLOS ONE, 3(6), e2431.Google Scholar

Trumble, B. C., Jaeggi, A. V., & Gurven, M. (2015). Evolving the neuroendocrine physiology of human and primate cooperation and collective action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biological Sciences, 370(1683), 20150014.Google Scholar

van Elsacker, L. (1995). A review of terminology on aggregation patterns in bonobos (Pan paniscus). International Journal of Primatology, 16, 37–52.Google Scholar

Vervaecke, H., Stevens, J., & van Elsacker, L. (2003). Interfering with others: Female–female reproductive competition in Pan paniscus. In Jones, C. B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in primates: New perspectives and directions (pp. 231–253). Oklahoma: The American Society of Primatologists.Google Scholar

Wallen, K., & Lloyd, E. A. (2008). Clitoral variability compared with penile variability supports nonadaptation of female orgasm. Evolution & Development, 10(1), 1–2.Google Scholar

Wangham, R. (1993). The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos. Human Nature, 4, 47–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

White, F. J., & Wood, K. D. (2007). Female feeding priority in bonobos, Pan paniscus, and the question of female dominance. American Journal of Primatology, 69(8), 837–850.Google Scholar

Wickler, W. (1967). Socio-sexual signals and their intra-specific imitation among primates. In Morris, D. (Ed.), Primate ethology (pp. 69–147). London: Weidenfield.Google Scholar

Williams, L. A., Brosnan, S. F., & Clay, Z. (2020). Anthropomorphism in comparative affective science: Advocating a mindful approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 115, 299–307.Google Scholar

Woods, V., & Hare, B. (2011). Bonobo but not chimpanzee infants use socio-sexual contact with peers. Primates, 52(2), 111–116.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (1993). The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos. Human Nature, 4, 47–79.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, S. (2015). Non-reciprocal but peaceful fruit sharing in wild bonobos in Wamba. Behaviour, 152, 335–357.Google Scholar

Zumpe, D., & Michael, R. P. (1968). The clutching reaction and orgasm in the female rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Endocrinology, 40, 117.Google Scholar

References

Ancrenaz, M., Gumal, M., Marshall, A. J., Meijaard, E., Wich, S. A., & Husson, S. (2016). Pongo pygmaeus (errata version published in 2018). In The IUCN red list of threatened species 2016 e. T17975A17966347. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-1.RLTS.T17975A17966347.en Google Scholar

Andersson, M. B. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Archie, E. A., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2014). Costs of reproduction in a long-lived female primate: Injury risk and wound healing. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 68, 1183–1193.Google Scholar

Arora, N., Van Noordwijk, M. A., Ackermann, C., Willems, E. P., Nater, A., Greminger, M., … & Krützen, M. (2012). Parentage-based pedigree reconstruction reveals female matrilineal clusters and male-biased dispersal in nongregarious Asian great apes, the Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Molecular Ecology, 21, 3352–3362.Google Scholar

Ashbury, A. M., Willems, E. P., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Saputra, F., van Schaik, C. P., & van Noordwijk, M. A. (2020). Home range establishment and the mechanisms of philopatry among female Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) at Tuanan. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21(4), 42.Google Scholar

Banes, G. L., Galdikas, B. M. F., & Vigilant, L. (2015). Male orangutan bimaturism and reproductive success at Camp Leakey in Tanjung Puting National Park, Indonesia. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 1785–1794.Google Scholar

Baniel, A., Cowlishaw, G., & Huchard, E. (2017). Male violence and sexual intimidation in a wild primate society. Current Biology, 27, 2163–2168.Google Scholar

Bellemain, E., Swenson, J. E., & Taberlet, P. (2006). Mating strategies in relation to sexually selected infanticide in a non‐social carnivore: The brown bear. Ethology, 112, 238–246.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T., & McAuliffe, K. (2009). Female mate choice in mammals. Quarterly Review of Biology, 84, 3–27.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T., & Parker, G. A. (1992). Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Quarterly Review of Biology, 67, 437–456.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1345–1365.Google Scholar

Connor, R. C., & Vollmer, N. L. (2009). Sexual coercion in dolphin consortships: A comparison with chimpanzees. In Muller, M. N. & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans (pp. 218–243). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, J. F., Gould, K. G., & Nadler, R. D. (1993). Testicle size of orang‐utans in relation to body size. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 90, 229–236.Google Scholar

Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1983). Sex, evolution, and behavior. Boston: Willard Grant Press.Google Scholar

Delgado, R. A. (2003). The function of adult male long calls in wild orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar

Delgado, R. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2000). The behavioral ecology and conservation of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): A tale of two islands. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 201–218.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F. (2018). Copulatory and postcopulatory sexual selection in primates. Folia Primatologica, 89, 258–286.Google Scholar

Drea, C. M. (2015). D’scent of man: A comparative survey of primate chemosignaling in relation to sex. Hormones and Behavior, 68, 117–133.Google Scholar

Dunkel, L. P., Arora, N., van Noordwijk, M. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Putra, A. P., Krützen, M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2013). Variation in developmental arrest among male orangutans: A comparison between a Sumatran and a Bornean population. Frontiers in Zoology, 10, 12.Google Scholar

Emery Thompson, M. (2009). Human rape: Revising evolutionary perspectives. In Muller, M. N. & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans: An evolutionary perspective on male aggression against females (pp. 346–374). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar

Emery Thompson, M., Stumpf, R. M., & Pusey, A. E. (2008). Female reproductive strategies and competition in apes: An introduction. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 815–821.CrossRef Google Scholar

Emery Thompson, M., Zhou, A., & Knott, C. D. (2012). Low testosterone correlates with delayed development in male orangutans. PLOS ONE, 7, e47282.Google Scholar

Fox, E. A. (1998). The function of female mate choice in Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii). Durham, NC: Duke University.Google Scholar

Fox, E. A. (2002). Female tactics to reduce sexual harassment in the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 52, 93–101.Google Scholar

Galdikas, B. M. F. (1981). Orangutan reproduction in the wild. In Graham, C. E. (Ed.), Reproductive biology of the great apes: Comparative and biomedical perspectives (pp. 281–300). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Galdikas, B. M. F. (1985a). Adult male sociality and reproductive tactics among orangutans at Tanjung Puting. Folia Primatologica, 45, 9–24.CrossRef Google Scholar

Galdikas, B. M. F. (1985b). Subadult male orangutan sociality and reproductive behavior at Tanjung Puting. American Journal of Primatology, 8, 87–99.Google Scholar

Galdikas, B. M. F. (1995). Social and reproductive behavior of wild adolescent female orangutans. In The neglected ape (pp. 163–182). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Goossens, B., Setchell, J. M., James, S. S., Funk, S. M., Chikhi, L., Abulani, A. … & Bruford, M. W. (2006). Philopatry and reproductive success in Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Molecular Ecology, 15, 2577–2588.Google Scholar

Henzi, S. P., Clarke, P. M. R., van Schaik, C. P., Pradhan, G. R., & Barrett, L. (2010). Infanticide and reproductive restraint in a polygynous social mammal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 2130–2135.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B., & Whitten, P. L. (1987). Patterning of sexual behavior. In Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W., & Struhsaker, T. T. (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 370–384). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1739). A treatise of human nature. London: John Noon.Google Scholar

Kinoshita, K., Indo, Y., Tajima, T., Kuze, N., Miyakawa, E., Kobayashi, T., … & Hirata, S. (2021). Comparative analysis of sperm motility in liquid and seminal coagulum portions between Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates, 62(3), 467–473.Google Scholar

Knott, C. D. (2009). Orangutans: Sexual coercion without sexual violence. In Muller, M. N. & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans (pp. 81–111). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Knott, C. D., Emery Thompson, M., Stumpf, R. M., & McIntyre, M. H. (2010). Female reproductive strategies in orangutans, evidence for female choice and counterstrategies to infanticide in a species with frequent sexual coercion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277, 105–113.Google Scholar

Knott, C. D., Emery Thompson, M., & Wich, S. A. (2009). The ecology of female reproduction in wild orangutans. In Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 171–188). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Knott, C. D., Scott, A. M., DiGiorgio, A., Kane, E. E., Susanto, T. W., & Riyandi, R. (2018). Are female orangutans less efficient foragers because of the risk of sexual coercion? In 27th International Primatological Society Congress, Nairobi.Google Scholar

Knott, C. D., Scott, A. M., O’Connell, C. A., Scott, K. S., Laman, T. G., & Susanto, T. W. (2019). Possible male infanticide in wild orangutans and a re-evaluation of infanticide risk. Scientific Reports, 9, 7806.Google Scholar

Kunz, J. A. (2020). Sexual conflict in orangutans. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Kunz, J. A., Duvot, G. J., van Noordwijk, M. A., Willems, E. P., Townsend, M., Mardianah, N., … & van Schaik, C. P. (2021a). The cost of associating with males for Bornean and Sumatran female orangutans: A hidden form of sexual conflict? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(1), 1–22.Google Scholar

Kunz, J. A., Duvot, G. J., Willems, E. P., Stickelberger, J., Spillmann, B., Atmoko, S. S. U., … & van Schaik, C. P. (2021). The context of sexual coercion in orang-utans: when do male and female mating interests collide? Animal Behaviour, 182, 67–90.Google Scholar

Leigh, S. R., & Shea, B. T. (1995). Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes. American Journal of Primatology, 36, 37–60.Google Scholar

Lukas, D., & Huchard, E. (2014). The evolution of infanticide by males in mammalian societies. Science, 346, 841–844.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, J. (1974). The behavior and ecology of wild orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Animal Behaviour, 22, 3–74.Google Scholar

Maggioncalda, A. N., Sapolsky, R. M., & Czekala, N. M. (1999). Reproductive hormone profiles in captive male orangutans: Implications for understanding developmental arrest. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 109, 19–32.Google Scholar

Markham, R., & Groves, C. P. (1990). Brief communication: Weights of wild orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 81, 1–3.Google Scholar

Marty, P. R., van Noordwijk, M. A., Heistermann, M., Willems, E. P., Dunkel, L. P., Cadilek, M., Agil, M., & Weingrill, T. (2015). Endocrinological correlates of male bimaturism in wild Bornean orangutans. American Journal of Primatology, 77, 1170–1178.Google Scholar

Marzec, A. M., Kunz, J. A., Falkner, S., Atmoko, S. S. U., Alavi, S. E., Moldawer, A. M., … & van Noordwijk, M. A. (2016). The dark side of the red ape: Male-mediated lethal female competition in Bornean orangutans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70, 459–466.Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C. (1985). Sexual selection and adult male orangutan long calls. Animal Behaviour, 33, 272–283.Google Scholar

Mitra Setia, T., Delgado, R. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Singleton, I., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Social organization and male–female relationships. In Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 245–253). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). The response of adult orangutans to flanged male long calls: Inferences about their function. Folia Primatolica, 78, 215–226.Google Scholar

Morrogh-Bernard, H. C. (2009). Orangutan behavioral ecology in the Sabangau peat-swamp forest. Borneo: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., Emery Thompson, M., Kahlenberg, S. M., & Wrangham, R. W. (2011). Sexual coercion by male chimpanzees shows that female choice may be more apparent than real. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 921–933.Google Scholar

Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2009). Sexual coercion in primates and humans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, R. D. (1981). Laboratory research on sexual behavior of the great apes. In Graham, C. (Ed.), Reproductive biology of the great apes: Comparative and biomedical perspectives (pp. 191–238). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Nietlisbach, P., Arora, N., Nater, A., Goossens, B., van Schaik, C. P., & Krützen, M. (2012). Heavily male-biased long-distance dispersal of orangutans (genus: Pongo), as revealed by Y-chromosomal and mitochondrial genetic markers. Molecular Ecology, 21, 3173–3186.Google Scholar

Nowak, M. G., Rianti, P., Wich, S., Meijide, A., & Fredriksson, G. (2017). Pongo tapanuliensis. The IUCN red list of threatened species 2017: e.T120588639A120588662. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T120588639A120588662.en Google Scholar

Nunn, C. L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 58, 229–246.Google Scholar

O’Connell, C. A., Susanto, T. W., & Knott, C. D. (2019). Sociosexual behavioral patterns involving nulliparous female orangutans (Pongo sp.) reflect unique challenges during the adolescent period. American Journal of Primatology, 82(11), e23058.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (2000). Infanticide and the evolution of male–female bonds in animals. In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 239–268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (2014). Sexual conflict in nonhuman primates. In Advances in the study of behavior, pp. 191–280. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (2015). Infanticide as sexual conflict: Coevolution of male strategies and female counterstrategies. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7, a017640.Google Scholar

Parker, G. A. (1979). Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In Blum, M. S. & Blum, N. A. (Eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (pp. 123–166). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Parker, G. A., Lessells, C. M., & Simmons, L. W. (2013). Sperm competition games: A general model for precopulatory male–male competition. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution, 67, 95–109.Google Scholar

Pradhan, G. R., van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2012). A model for the evolution of developmental arrest in male orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 149, 18–25.Google Scholar

Pradhan, G. R., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Why do females find ornaments attractive? The coercion-avoidance hypothesis. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 96, 372–382.Google Scholar

Pusey, A. E. (1980). Inbreeding avoidance in chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 28, 543–552.Google Scholar

Rijksen, H. D. (1978). A field study on Sumatran orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii): Ecology, behavior and conservation. Wageningen, Netherlands: Veenman.Google Scholar

Roth, T. S., Rianti, P., Fredriksson, G. M., Wich, S. A., & Nowak, M. G. (2020). Grouping behavior of Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii) and Tapanuli orangutans (Pongo tapanuliensis) living in forest with low fruit abundance. American Journal of Primatology, 82, e23123.Google Scholar

Schultz, A. H. (1938). Genital swelling in the female orangutan. Journal of Mammalogy, 19, 363–366.Google Scholar

Schürmann, C. L. (1982). Mating behavior of wild orangutans. In de Boer, L. (Ed.), The orangutan: Its biology and conservation (pp. 269–284). The Hague, Boston, and London: Dr. W. Junk Publishers.Google Scholar

Scott, A. M., Knott, C. D., & Susanto, T. W. (2019). Are male orangutans a threat to infants? Evidence of mother–offspring counterstrategies to infanticide in Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii). International Journal of Primatology, 40, 435–455.Google Scholar

Setchell, J. M. (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics in primates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Setchell, J. M., & Huchard, E. (2010). The hidden benefits of sex: Evidence for MHC‐associated mate choice in primate societies. Bioessays, 32, 940–948.Google Scholar

Singleton, I., Knott, C. D., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., Wich, S. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Ranging behavior of orangutan females and social organization. In Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 205–214). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Singleton, I., & van Schaik, C. P. (2001). Orangutan home range size and its determinants in a Sumatran swamp forest. International Journal of Primatology, 22, 877–911.Google Scholar

Singleton, I., Wich, S. A., Nowak, M., Usher, G., & Utami Atmoko, S. S. (2018). Pongo abelii (errata version published in 2018). In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2017: e.T121097935A123797627. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2017-3.RLTS.T121097935A115575085.en Google Scholar

Soltis, J., Thomsen, R., Matsubayashi, K., & Takenaka, O. (2000). Infanticide by resident males and female counter-strategies in wild Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 195–202.Google Scholar

Spillmann, B. (2017). Long calls mediate male–male competition in Bornean orangutans: an approach using automated acoustic localization. Zurich: University of Zurich.Google Scholar

Spillmann, B., Dunkel, L. P., van Noordwijk, M. A., Amda, R. N. A., Lameira, A. R., Wich, S. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2010). Acoustic properties of long calls given by flanged male orang‐utans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) reflect both individual identity and context. Ethology 116, 385–395.Google Scholar

Spillmann, B., Willems, E. P., van Noordwijk, M. A., Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (2017). Confrontational assessment in the roving male promiscuity mating system of the Bornean orangutan. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 71, 20.Google Scholar

Stumpf, R. M., Emery Thompson, M., & Knott, C. D. (2008). A comparison of female mating strategies in Pan troglodytes and Pongo spp. International Journal of Primatology, 29, 865–884.Google Scholar

Stumpf, R. M., Martinez-Mota, R., Milich, K. M., Righini, N., & Shattuck, M. R. (2011). Sexual conflict in primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20, 62–75.Google Scholar

Sunderland-Groves, J. L., Tandang, M. V., Patispathika, F. H., Marzec, A., Knox, A., Nurcahyo, A., … & Sihite, J. (2020). Suspected Sunda clouded leopard (Neofelis diardi) predation attempts on two reintroduced Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) in Bukit Batikap Protection Forest, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Primates, 62(1), 41–49.Google Scholar

Sussman, R. W., Cheverud, J. M., & Bartlett, T. Q. (1995). Infant killings as evolutionary strategy: Reality or myth? Evolutionary Anthropology, 3, 364–367.Google Scholar

Tajima, T., Malim, T. P., & Inoue, E. (2018). Reproductive success of two male morphs in a free‑ranging population of Bornean orangutans. Primates 59, 127–133.Google Scholar

Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. T. (2001). A natural history of rape: Biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Utami Atmoko, S. S., Goossens, B., Bruford, M. W., De Ruiter, J. R., & van Hooff, J. A. (2002). Male bimaturism success and reproductive success in Sumatran orangutans. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 643–652.Google Scholar

Utami Atmoko, S. S., & Mitra Setia, T. (1995). Behavioral changes in wild male and female Sumatran orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) during and following a resident male take-over. In Nadler, R. D., Galdikas, B. F. M., Sheeran, L. K., & Rosen, N. (Eds.), The neglected ape (pp. 183–190). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., Goossens, B., James, S. S., Knott, C. D., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., … & van Noordwijk, M. A. (2009). Orangutan mating behavior and strategies. In Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 235–244). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Utami Atmoko, S. S., Singleton, I., van Noordwijk, M. A., van Schaik, C. P., & Mitra Setia, T. (2009a). Male–male relationships in orangutans. In Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 225–233). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Utami Atmoko, S. S., & van Hooff, J. A. (2004). Alternative male reproductive strategies: Male bimaturism in orangutans. In Kappeler, P. M. & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 196–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Noordwijk, M. A., Arora, N., Willems, E. P., Dunkel, L. P., Amda, R. N. A., Mardianah, N., … & van Schaik, C. P. (2012). Female philopatry and its social benefits among Bornean orangutans. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66, 823–834.Google Scholar

van Noordwijk, M. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Knott, C. D., Kuze, N., Morrogh-Bernard, H. C., Oram, F., … & Willems, E. P. (2018). The slow ape: High infant survival and long interbirth intervals in wild orangutans. Journal of Human Evolution, 125, 38–49.Google Scholar

van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. P. (2000). Reproductive patterns in eutherian mammals: adaptations against infanticide? In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 322–360). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P. (1999). The socioecology of fission-fusion sociality in orangutans. Primates, 40, 69–86.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P. (2000a). Infanticide by male primates: The sexual selection hypothesis revisited. In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 27–60). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P. (2000b). Social counterstrategies against infanticide by males in primates and other mammals. In Kappeler, P. M. (Ed.), Primate males: Causes and consequences of variation in group composition (pp. 34–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P. (2000c). Vulnerability to infanticide by males: Patterns among mammals. In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 61–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P. (2004). Among orangutans: Red apes and the rise of human culture. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P. (2016). The primate origins of human nature. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., Hodges, J. K., & Nunn, C. L. 2000). Paternity confusion and the ovarian cycles of female primates. In van Schaik, C. P. & Janson, C. H. (Eds.), Infanticide by males and its implications (pp. 361–387). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., & Janson, C. H. (2000). Infanticide by males and its implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Infanticide risk and the evolution of male–female association in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences, 264, 1687–1694.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., Marshall, A. J., & Wich, S. A. (2009). Geographic variation in orangutan behavior and biology. In Wich, S. A., Utami Atmoko, S. S., Mitra Setia, T., & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Orangutans: Geographic variation in behavioral ecology and conservation (pp. 351–361). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., Pradhan, G. R., & van Noordwijk, M. A. (2004). Mating conflict in primates: Infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality. In Kappeler, P. M. & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 141–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Vogel, E. R., Alavi, S. E., Utami‐Atmoko, S. S., van Noordwijk, M. A., Bransford, T. D., Erb, W. M., … & Rothman, J. M. (2017). Nutritional ecology of wild Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) in a peat swamp habitat: Effects of age, sex, and season. American Journal of Primatology, 79, 1–20.Google Scholar

Wich, S. A., Vogel, E. R., Larsen, M. D., Fredriksson, G., Leighton, M., Yeager, C. P., … & Marshall, A. J. (2011). Forest fruit production is higher on Sumatra than on Borneo. PLOS ONE, 6, e21278.Google Scholar

Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (2009). Coercive violence by human males against their female partners. In Muller, M. N. & Wrangham, R. W. (Eds.), Sexual coercion in primates and humans (pp. 271–391). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Wolff, J. O. (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics in nonprimate male mammals. In Oliveira, R. F., Taborsky, M., & Brockmann, H. J. (Eds.), Alternative reproductive tactics: An integrative approach (pp. 356–372). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (2002). The cost of sexual attraction: Is there a trade-off in female Pan between sex appeal and received coercion? In Boesch, C., Hohmann, G. & Marchand, L. F. (Eds.), Behavioral diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos (pp. 204–215). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zeh, J. A., & Zeh, D. W. (2001). Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry. Animal Behaviour, 61, 1051–1063.Google Scholar

Zinner, D. P., Nunn, C. L., van Schaik, C. P, & Kappeler, P. M. (2004). Sexual selection and exaggerated sexual swellings of female primates. In Kappeler, P. M. & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 71–89). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

References

Ahsan, F. (1995). Fighting between two females for a male in the hoolock gibbon. International Journal of Primatology, 16(5), 731–737.Google Scholar

Ahsan, M. F. (2001). Socio-ecology of the hoolock gibbon (Hylobates hoolock) in two forests of Bangladesh. In The apes challenges for the 21st century, conference proceedings (pp. 286–299). Chicago: Chicago Zoological Society.Google Scholar

Alfred, J. R. B., & Sati, J. P. (1991). On the first record of infanticide in the hoolock gibbon Hylobates hoolock in the wild. Records of Zoological Survey of India, 89(1–4), 319–321.CrossRef Google Scholar

Amarasinghe, N., & Amarasinghe, A. A. (2011). Social behaviours of captive Hylobates moloch (Primates: Hylobatidae) in the Javan Gibbon Rescue and Rehabilitation Center, Gede-Pangrango National Nark, Indonesia. Taprobanica, 2(2), 97–103.Google Scholar

Barca, B., Vincent, C., Soeung, K., Nuttall, M., & Hobson, K. (2016). Multi-female group in the southernmost species of Nomascus: Field observations in eastern Cambodia reveal multiple breeding females in a single group of southern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon Nomascus gabriellae. Asian Primates Journal, 6(1), 15–19.Google Scholar

Barelli, C., Heistermann, M., Boesch, C., & Reichard, U. H. (2007). Sexual swellings in wild white-handed gibbon females (Hylobates lar) indicate the probability of ovulation. Hormones and Behavior, 51(2), 221–230.Google Scholar

Barelli, C., Heistermann, M., Boesch, C., & Reichard, U. H. (2008a). Mating patterns and sexual swellings in pair-living and multimale groups of wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar. Animal Behaviour, 75(3), 991–1001.Google Scholar

Barelli, C., Matsudaira, K., Wolf, T., Roos, C., Heistermann, M., Hodges, K., … & Reichard, U. H. (2013). Extra‐pair paternity confirmed in wild white‐handed gibbons. American Journal of Primatology, 75(12), 1185–1195.Google Scholar

Barelli, C., Reichard, U., Boesch, C., & Heistermann, M. (2008b). Female white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) lead group movements and have priority of access to food resources. Behaviour, 145(7), 965–981.Google Scholar

Barelli, C., Reichard, U. H., & Mundry, R. (2011). Is grooming used as a commodity in wild white-handed gibbons, Hylobates lar? Animal Behaviour, 82(4), 801–809.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q. (2003). Intragroup and intergroup social interactions in white-handed gibbons. International Journal of Primatology, 24(2), 239–259.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q. (2009a) The Gibbons of Khao Yai: Seasonal Variation in Behavior and Ecology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall (Reprint, New York: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q. (2009b). Seasonal home range use and defendability in white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park, Thailand. In Lappan, S. & Whittaker, D. J. (Eds.), The gibbons: A new perspective on small ape socioecology and population biology (pp. 265–275). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q. (2011). The Hylobatidae: Small apes of Asia. In Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Bearder, S. K., & Stumpf, R. M. (Eds.), Primates in perspective, 2nd ed. (pp. 300–312). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q., Light, L. E. O., & Brockelman, W. Y. (2016). Long-term home range use in white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Khao Yai National Park. American Journal of Primatology, 78(2), 192–203.Google Scholar

Bartlett, T. Q., & Sussman., R. W. (in press) Gibbons: Arboreal acrobats of Southeast Asia. In Sussman, R. W. (Ed.), The natural history of primates: A systematic survey of ecology and behavior. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Bertram, J. E. (2004). New perspectives on brachiation mechanics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 125(S39), 100–117.Google Scholar

Bolechova, P., Chaloupkova, H., Hradec, M., Janova, E., & Doležalová, J. (2019). Fur color change and hormonal development in captive females of northern white-cheeked (Nomascus leucogenys) and buff-cheeked (Nomascus gabriellae) gibbons. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 282, 113210.Google Scholar

Borries, C., Savini, T., & Koenig, A. (2011). Social monogamy and the threat of infanticide in larger mammals. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65(4), 685–693.Google Scholar

Bourliere, F. (1964). The natural history of mammals, 3rd ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Bradley, B. J., & Mundy, N. I. (2008). The primate palette: The evolution of primate coloration. Evolutionary Anthropology, 17(2), 97–111.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W. Y. (1974). Social interactions of adult gibbons (Hylobates lar) in an experimental colony. Gibbon and Siamang, 3, 137–156.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W. Y. (2009). Ecology and the social system of gibbons. In Lappan, S. & Whittaker, D. J. (Eds.), The gibbons: A new perspective on small ape socioecology and population biology (pp. 211–239). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W., & Geissmann, T. (2019). Hoolock leuconedys. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2019, e.T118355453A17968300.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W., & Geissmann, T. (2020). Hylobates lar. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T10548A17967253.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W., Geissmann, T., Timmins, T., & Traeholt, C. (2020). Hylobates pileatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T10552A17966665.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W., Molur, S., & Geissmann, T. (2019). Hoolock. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2019, e.T39876A17968083.Google Scholar

Brockelman, W. Y., Reichard, U., Treesucon, U., & Raemaekers, J. J. (1998). Dispersal, pair formation and social structure in gibbons (Hylobates lar). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42(5), 329–339.Google Scholar

Brotherton, P. N. M., & Komers, P. E. (2003) Mate guarding and the evolution of social monogamy in mammals. In Reichard, U. H. & Boesch, C. (Eds.), Monogamy: Mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals (pp. 42–58). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bryant, J. V., Gottelli, D., Zeng, X., Hong, X., Chan, B. P. L., Fellowes, J. R., … & Turvey, S. T. (2016). Assessing current genetic status of the Hainan gibbon using historical and demographic baselines: Implications for conservation management of species of extreme rarity. Molecular Ecology, 25(15), 3540–3556.Google Scholar

Burns, B. L., Dooley, H. M., & Judge, D. S. (2011). Social dynamics modify behavioural development in captive white-cheeked (Nomascus leucogenys) and silvery (Hylobates moloch) gibbons. Primates, 52, 271–277.Google Scholar

Caine, N. G. (1987). Vigilance, vocalizations, and cryptic behavior at retirement in captive groups of red‐bellied tamarins (Saguinus labiatus). American Journal of Primatology, 12(3), 241–250.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Carpenter, C. R. (1940). A field study in Siam of the behavior and social relations of the gibbons (Hylobates lar). Comparative Psychology Monographs, 16, 1–212.Google Scholar

Carter, C. S., & Cushing, B. S. (2004). Proximate mechanisms regulating sociality and social monogamy, in the context of evolution. In Sussman, R. W. & Chapman, A. R. (Eds.), The origins and nature of sociality (pp. 99–121). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Carter, C. S., Devries, A. C., & Getz, L. L. (1995). Physiological substrates of mammalian monogamy: The prairie vole model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 19(2), 303–314.Google Scholar

Carter, C. S., & Perkeybile, A. M. (2018). The monogamy paradox: What do love and sex have to do with it? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 202.Google Scholar

Cheyne, S. M., Capilla, B. R., Cahyaningrum, E., & Smith, D. E. (2019). Home range variation and site fidelity of Bornean southern gibbons [Hylobates albibarbis] from 2010–2018. PLOS ONE, 14(7), e0217784.Google Scholar

Cheyne, S. M., & Chivers, D. J. (2006). Sexual swellings of female gibbons. Folia Primatologica, 77(5), 345–352.Google Scholar

Cheyne, S. M., & Nijman, V. (2020). Hylobates abbotti. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020: e.T39889A17990882.Google Scholar

Chivers, D. J. (1974). The siamang in Malaya. A field study of a primate in tropical rain forest. Contributions to Primatology, 4, 1–335.Google Scholar

Chivers, D. J. (2013). Southeast Asian primates: Socio-ecology and conservation. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 29, 177–185.Google Scholar

Chivers, D. J., & Raemaekers, J. J. (1980). Long-term changes in behaviour. In Chivers, D. J. (Ed.), Malayan forest primates (pp. 209–260). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Choudhury, A. (1991). Ecology of the hoolock gibbon (Hylobates hoolock), a lesser ape in the tropical forests of north-eastern India. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 7(1), 147–153.Google Scholar

Clarke, E., Reichard, U. H., & Zuberbühler, K. (2015). Context-specific close-range “hoo” calls in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar). BMC Evolutionary Biology, 15(1), 1–11.Google Scholar

Clemens, Z., Merker, B., & Ujhelyi, M. (2008). Observations on paternal care in a captive family of white-handed gibbons (Hylobates lar). Gibbon Journal, 4, 46–50.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. (2016). Mammal societies. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Dal Pra, G., & Geissmann, T. (1994). Behavioural development of twin siamangs (Hylobates syndactylus). Primates, 35(3), 325–342.Google Scholar

Dallmann, R., & Geissmann, T. (2001). Different levels of variability in the female song of wild silvery gibbons (Hylobates moloch). Behaviour, 138(5), 629–648.Google Scholar

Dielentheis, T. F., Zaiss, E., & Geissmann, T. (1991). Infant care in a family of siamangs (Hylobates syndactylus) with twin offspring at Berlin Zoo. Zoo Biology, 10(4), 309–317.Google Scholar

Dolotovskaya, S., Walker, S., & Heymann, E. W. (2020). What makes a pair bond in a Neotropical primate: Female and male contributions. Royal Society Open Science, 7(1), 191489.Google Scholar

Ellefson, J. O. (1974). A natural history of white-handed gibbons in the Malayan Peninsula. In Rumbaugh, D. M. (Ed.), Gibbon and siamang: Natural history, social behavior, reproduction, vocalizations, prehension (Vol. 3) (pp. 1–136). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.Google Scholar

Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197(4300), 215–223.Google Scholar

Fan, P., & Bartlett, T. Q. (2017). Overlooked small apes need more attention. American Journal of Primatology, 79(6), e22658.Google Scholar

Fan, P. F., Bartlett, T. Q., Fei, H. L., Ma, C. Y., & Zhang, W. (2015). Understanding stable bi-female grouping in gibbons: Feeding competition and reproductive success. Frontiers in Zoology, 12(1), 1–14.Google Scholar

Fan, P., Fei, H., Xiang, Z., Zhang, W., Ma, C., & Huang, T. (2010). Social structure and group dynamics of the Cao Vit gibbon (Nomascus nasutus) in Bangliang, Jingxi, China. Folia Primatologica, 81(5), 245–253.Google Scholar

Fan, P. F., & Jiang, X. L. (2010). Maintenance of multifemale social organization in a group of Nomascus concolor at Wuliang Mountain, Yunnan, China. International Journal of Primatology, 31(1), 1–13.Google Scholar

Fan, P., Liu, C., Luo, W., & Jiang, X. (2007). Can a group elicit duets from its neighbours? A field study on the black-crested gibbon (Nomascus concolor jingdongensis) in central Yunnan, China. Folia Primatologica, 78(3), 186–195.Google Scholar

Fan, P. F., Nguyen, M. H., Phiaphalath, P., Roos, C., Coudrat, C. N. Z., & Rawson, B. M. (2020). Nomascus concolor. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39775A17968556.Google Scholar

Fan, P. F., Ren, P. G., Wang, W., Scott, M. B., Ma, C. Y., Fei, H. L., … & Zhu, J. G. (2013). Habitat evaluation and population viability analysis of the last population of Cao Vit gibbon (Nomascus nasutus): Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation, 161(5), 39–47.Google Scholar

Fan, P. F., Turvey, S. T., & Bryant, J. V. (2020). Hoolock tianxing (amended version of 2019 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T118355648A166597159.Google Scholar

Fan, P., He, X., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, H., Yuan, L., … & Fan, P. (2021). Reproductive parameters of captive female northern white-cheeked (Nomascus leucogenys) and yellow-cheeked (Nomascus gabriellae) gibbons. International Journal of Primatology, 42(1), 1–15.Google Scholar

Fashing, P. J. (2001). Male and female strategies during intergroup encounters in guerezas (Colobus guereza): Evidence for resource defense mediated through males and a comparison with other primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 50(3), 219–230.Google Scholar

Fernandez-Duque, E., Valeggia, C. R., & Mendoza, S. P. (2009). The biology of paternal care in human and nonhuman primates. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 115–130.Google Scholar

Fischer, J. O., & Geissmann, T. (1990). Group harmony in gibbons: Comparison between white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) and siamang (H. syndactylus). Primates, 31(4), 481–494.Google Scholar

Fooden, J. (1971). Report on primates collected in Western Thailand, January–April 1967. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar

Frechette, J. L., Hon, N., Behie, A., & Rawson, B. M. (2017). Seasonal variation in the diet and activity budget of the northern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon Nomascus annamensis. Cambodia Journal of Natural History, 2017(2), 168–178.Google Scholar

French, J. A., Cavanaugh, J., Mustoe, A. C., Carp, S. B., & Womack, S. L. (2018). Social monogamy in nonhuman primates: Phylogeny, phenotype, and physiology. The Journal of Sex Research, 55(4–5), 410–434.Google Scholar

Frisch, J. E. (1963). Sex-differences in the canines of the gibbon (Hylobates lar). Primates, 4(2), 1–10.Google Scholar

Fuentes, A. (1998). Re‐evaluating primate monogamy. American Anthropologist, 100(4), 890–907.Google Scholar

Fuentes, A. (2000). Hylobatid communities: Changing views on pair bonding and social organization in hominoids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 113 (S31), 33–60.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T. (1991). A reassessment of age of sexual maturity in gibbons (Hylobates spp.). American Journal of Primatology, 23, 11–22.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T. (1999). Duet songs of the siamang, Hylobates syndactylus: II. Testing the pair-bonding hypothesis during a partner exchange. Behaviour, 136(8), 1005–1039.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T. (2008). Inter-group conflict in captive siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus). Gibbon Journal, 4, 51–55.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T. (2009). Door slamming: Tool-use by a captive white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Gibbon Journal, 5, 53–60.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T., & Bleisch, W. (2020). Nomascus hainanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T41643A17969392.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T., Bohlen-Eyring, S., & Heuck, A. (2005). The male song of the Javan silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch). Contributions to Zoology, 74(1–2), 1–25.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T., & Nijman, V. (2006). Calling in wild silvery gibbons (Hylobates moloch) in Java (Indonesia): Behavior, phylogeny and conservation. American Journal of Primatology, 68(1), 1–19.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T., Nijman, V., Boonratana, R., Brockelman, W., Roos, C., & Nowak, M. G. (2020a). Hylobates agilis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T10543A17967655.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T., & Orgeldinger, M. (2000). The relationship between duet songs and pair bonds in siamangs, Hylobates syndactylus. Animal Behaviour, 60, 805–809.Google Scholar

Geissmann, T., Rosenkranz-Weck, S., Van Der Loo, J. J., & Orgeldinger, M. (2020b). Taxon-specific pair bonding in gibbons (Hylobatidae). Primates. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95270 Google Scholar

Gittins, S. P., & Raemaekers, J. J. (1980). Siamang, lar and agile gibbons. In Chivers, D. J. (Ed.), Malayan forest primates (pp. 63–106). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Gowaty, P. A. (1985). Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. Ornithology Monographs, 37, 11–21.Google Scholar

Gowaty, P. A. (1996) Multiple mating by females selects for males that stay: Another hypothesis for social monogamy in passerine birds. Animal Behavior, 51, 482–484.Google Scholar

Griffith, S. C., Owens, I. P., & Thuman, K. A. (2002). Extra pair paternity in birds: A review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology, 11(11), 2195–2212.Google Scholar

Guan, Z. H., Huang, B., Ning, W. H., Ni, Q. Y., & Jiang, X. L. (2013). Proximity association in polygynous western black crested gibbons (Nomascus concolor jingdongensis): Network structure and seasonality. Zoological Research, 34(E1), E1–E8.Google Scholar

Ham, S., Lappan, S., Hedwig, D., & Choe, J. C. (2017). Female songs of the nonduetting Javan gibbons (Hylobates moloch) function for territorial defense. International Journal of Primatology, 38(3), 533–552.Google Scholar

Hilgartner, R., Fichtel, C., Kappeler, P. M., & Zinner, D. (2012). Determinants of pair‐living in red‐tailed sportive lemurs (Lepilemur ruficaudatus). Ethology, 118(5), 466–479.Google Scholar

Hinde, K., Muth, C., Maninger, N., Ragen, B. J., Larke, R. H., Jarcho, M. R., … & Bales, K. L. (2016). Challenges to the pair bond: Neural and hormonal effects of separation and reunion in a monogamous primate. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 221.Google Scholar

Hodgekiss, S., Thetford, E., Waitt, C. D., & Nijman, V. (2010). Female reproductive parameters in the Javan gibbon (Hylobates moloch). Zoo Biology, 29, 449–456.Google Scholar

Hu, N., Guan, Z., Huang, B., Ning, W., He, K., Fan, P., & Jiang, X. (2018). Dispersal and female philopatry in a long‐term, stable, polygynous gibbon population: Evidence from 16 years field observation and genetics. American Journal of Primatology, 80(9), e22922.Google Scholar

Huang, B., Guan, Z., Ni, Q., Orkin, J. D., Fan, P., & Jiang, X. (2013). Observation of intra‐group and extra‐group copulation and reproductive characters in free ranging groups of western black crested gibbon (Nomascus concolor jingdongensis). Integrative Zoology, 8(4), 427–440.Google Scholar

Huang, X. X., Zhou, W., & Ai, H. S. (2010). Mating behavior of hoolock gibbon (Hoolock hoolock) in the field: A case study at Mt. Gaoligong, Yunnan, China. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 30(2), 52–55.Google Scholar

Huck, M., Di Fiore, A., & Fernandez-Duque, E. (2020). Of apples and oranges? The evolution of “monogamy” in non-human primates. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 472.Google Scholar

Inoue, Y., Sinun, W., & Okanoya, K. (2016). Activity budget, travel distance, sleeping time, height of activity and travel order of wild East Bornean grey gibbons (Hylobates funereus) in Danum Valley Conservation Area. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 64, 127–128.Google Scholar

Inoue, Y., Sinun, W., Yosida, S., & Okanoya, K. (2013). Intergroup and intragroup antiphonal songs in wild male Mueller’s gibbons (Hylobates muelleri). Interaction Studies, 14(1), 24–43.Google Scholar

Jiang, X., Wang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1999). Coexistence of monogamy and polygyny in black-crested gibbon (Hylobates concolor). Primates, 40(4), 607–611.Google Scholar

Kappeler, P. M. (2019). A framework for studying social complexity. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 73(1), 13.Google Scholar

Kappeler, P. M., & Pozzi, L. (2019). Evolutionary transitions toward pair living in nonhuman primates as stepping stones toward more complex societies. Science Advances, 5(12), eaay1276.Google Scholar

Kappeler, P. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2002). Evolution of primate social systems. International Journal of Primatology, 23(4), 707–740.Google Scholar

Kawakami, T. G., & Kollias, G. V. (1984). Breeding and rearing lar gibbons in captivity. In Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D. J., Brockelman, W. Y., & Creel, N. (Eds.), The lesser apes: Evolutionary and behavioral biology (pp. 44–50). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Kelley, J. (1997). Palaeobiological and phylogenetic significance of life history in Miocene hominoids. In Begun, D. R., Ward, C. V., & Rose, N. D. (Eds.), Function, phylogeny, and fossils: Miocene hominoids evolution and adaptations (pp. 173–208). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar

Kenyon, M., Roos, C., Binh, V. T., & Chivers, D. (2011). Extrapair paternity in golden-cheeked gibbons (Nomascus gabriellae) in the secondary lowland forest of Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. Folia Primatologica, 82(3), 154–164.Google Scholar

Kim, S., Lappan, S., & Choe, J. A. (2011). Diet and ranging behavior of the endangered Javan gibbon (Hylobates moloch) in a submontane tropical rainforest. American Journal of Primatology, 73, 270–280.Google Scholar

Kleiman, D. G. (1977). Monogamy in mammals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 52(1), 39–69.Google Scholar

Kleiman, D. G., & Malcolm, J. R. (1981). The evolution of male parental investment in mammals. In Gubernick, D. J. M. & Klopfer, P. H. (Eds.), Parental care in mammals (pp. 347–387). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Klug, H. (2018). Why monogamy? A review of potential ultimate drivers. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 30.Google Scholar

Koyama, N. (1971). Observations on mating behavior of wild siamang gibbons at Fraser’s Hill, Malaysia. Primates, 12(2), 183–189.Google Scholar

Kumar, A., & Sharma, M. (2017). Reproductive biology of eastern hoolock gibbon Hoolock leuconedys in conservation breeding centre at biological park, Itanagar, Arunachal Pradesh, India. International Journal of Zoological Research, 13, 93–104.Google Scholar

Lack, D. (1968). Ecological adaptations for breeding in birds. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.Google Scholar

Lappan, S. (2007a). Patterns of dispersal in Sumatran siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus): Preliminary mtDNA evidence suggests more frequent male than female dispersal to adjacent groups. American Journal of Primatology, 69(6), 692–698.Google Scholar

Lappan, S. (2007b). Social relationships among males in multimale siamang groups. International Journal of Primatology, 28(2), 369–387.Google Scholar

Lappan, S. (2008). Male care of infants in a siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus) population including socially monogamous and polyandrous groups. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(8), 1307–1317.Google Scholar

Lappan, S. (2009). Patterns of infant care in wild siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus) in southern Sumatra. In Lappan, S. & Whittaker, D. J. (Eds.), The gibbons: A new perspective on small ape socioecology and population biology (pp. 327–345). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Lappan, S., & Morino, L. (2014). Mating in the presence of a competitor: Audience effects may promote male social tolerance in polyandrous siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus) groups. Behaviour, 151(7), 1067–1089.Google Scholar

Lappan, S., Sibarani, M., O’Brien, T. G., Nurcahyo, A., Andayani, N., Rustiati, E. L., … & Morino, L. (2020). Long‐term effects of forest fire on habitat use by siamangs in Southern Sumatra. Animal Conservation, 24(3), 355–366.Google Scholar

Light, L. E. O., & Bartlett, T. Q., (2017). Pair bonds. In Fuentes, A. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–5). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Liswanto, D., Whittaker, D., Geissmann, T., & Whitten, T. (2020). Hylobates klossii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T10547A17967475.Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Zhang, Y., Jiang, H., & Southwick, C. (1989). Population structure of Hylobates concolor in Bawanglin Nature Reserve, Hainan, China. American Journal of Primatology, 19, 247–254.Google Scholar

Lukas, K. E., Barkauskas, R. T., Maher, S. A., Jacobs, B. A., Bauman, J. E., Henderson, A. J., & Calcagno, J. M. (2002). Longitudinal study of delayed reproductive success in a pair of white‐cheeked gibbons (Hylobates leucogenys). Zoo Biology, 21(5), 413–434.Google Scholar

Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013). The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science, 341(6145), 526–530.Google Scholar

Ma, C. Y., Brockelman, W. Y., Light, L. E., Bartlett, T. Q., & Fan, P. F. (2019). Infant loss during and after male replacement in gibbons. American Journal of Primatology, 81(8), e23036.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, J., & MacKinnon, K. (1977). The formation of a new gibbon group. Primates, 18(3), 701–708.Google Scholar

MacLennan, A., Gutierrez, T., & Bartlett, T. Q. (2012). Group size and social flexibility among pair-bonded primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Supplement, 54, 199.Google Scholar

Malone, N., Fuentes, A., & White, F. J. (2012). Variation in the social systems of extant hominoids: comparative insight into the social behavior of early hominins. International Journal of Primatology, 33(6), 1251–1277.Google Scholar

Malone, N., & Okatvinalis, H. (2006) The socio-ecology of the silvery gibbon (Hylobates moloch) in the Cagar Alam Leuweung Sancang (CALS), West Java, Indonesia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129(S42), 124.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. J., Nijman, V., & Cheyne, S. (2020a). Hylobates albibarbis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39879A17967053.Google Scholar

Marshall, A. J., Nijman, V., & Cheyne, S. M. (2020b). Hylobates muelleri. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39888A17990934.Google Scholar

Matsudaira, K., Ishida, T., Malaivijitnond, S., & Reichard, U. H. (2018). Short dispersal distance of males in a wild white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar) population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 167(1), 61–71.Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C. (1984). The behavioral regulation of monogamy in gibbons (Hylobates muelleri). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 15(3), 225–229.Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C. (1985). Location-specific responses of gibbons (Hylobates muelleri) to male songs. Ethology, 70(3), 219–224.Google Scholar

Mitani, J. C., & Rodman, P. S. (1979). Territoriality: The relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5(3), 241–251.Google Scholar

Mootnick, A. R., & Fan, P. F. (2011). A comparative study of crested gibbons (Nomascus). American Journal of Primatology, 73(2), 135–154.Google Scholar

Morino, L. (2009). Monogamy in mammals: Expanding the perspective on hylobatid mating systems. In Lappan, S. & Whittaker, D. J. (Eds.), The gibbons: A new perspective on small ape socioecology and population biology (pp. 279–311). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Morino, L. (2016). Dominance relationships among siamang males living in multimale groups. American Journal of Primatology, 78(3), 288–297.Google Scholar

Morino, L., & Borries, C. (2017). Offspring loss after male change in wild siamangs: The importance of abrupt weaning and male care. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 162(1), 180–185.Google Scholar

Nettelbeck, A. R. (1998). Observations on food sharing in the wild lar gibbons (Hylobates lar). Folia Primatologica, 69(6), 386.Google Scholar

Nguyen, M. H., Coudrat, C. N. Z., Roos, C., Rawson, B. M., & Duckworth, J. W. (2020). Nomascus siki. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39896A17968765.Google Scholar

Nijman, V. (2020). Hylobates moloch. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T10550A17966495.Google Scholar

Nijman, V., Cheyne, S., & Traeholt, C. (2020). Hylobates funereus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39890A17990856.Google Scholar

Nijman, V., Geissmann, T., Traeholt, C., Roos, C., & Nowak, M. G. (2020). Symphalangus syndactylus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39779A17967873.Google Scholar

O’Brien, T. G., Kinnaird, M. F., Nurcahyo, A., Prasetyaningrum, M., & Iqbal, M. (2003). Fire, demography and the persistence of siamang (Symphalangus syndactylus: Hylobatidae) in a Sumatran rainforest. Animal Conservation, 6(2), 115–121.Google Scholar

Oka, T., & Takenaka, O. (2001). Wild gibbons’ parentage tested by non-invasive DNA sampling and PCR-amplified polymorphic microsatellites. Primates, 42(1), 67–73.Google Scholar

Opie, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2013). Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(33), 13328–13332.Google Scholar

Orgeldinger, M. (1991). Siamangs (Hylobates syndactylus) in captivity: An overview. International Zoo News, 38, 5–13.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (1992). Pair bonds and monogamy in wild siamang (Hylobates syndactylus) and whitehanded gibbon (Hylobates lar) in Northern Sumatra. (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Davis.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (1993). Lethal territorial aggression in a white‐handed gibbon. American Journal of Primatology, 31(4), 311–318.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (1994a). Dynamic pair bonds in hylobatids: Implications regarding monogamous social systems. Behaviour, 128(1–2), 65–101.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (1994b). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous ape. Animal Behaviour, 47, 721–723.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (1996). Pair bonds in monogamous apes: A comparison of the siamang Hylobates syndactylus and the white-handed gibbon Hylobates lar. Behaviour, 133(5–6), 321–356.Google Scholar

Palombit, R. A. (1999). Infanticide and the evolution of pair bonds in nonhuman primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 7(4), 117–129.Google Scholar

Pan, Y. (2000). Reproduction of hoolock gibbon held in captivity. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 19(2), 88–89.Google Scholar

Plavcan, M. J. (1999). Mating systems, intrasexual competition and sexual dimorphism in primates. In Lee, P. C. (Ed.), Primate comparative socioecology (pp. 241–270). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1992). Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87(4), 461–477.Google Scholar

Raemaekers, J. J., & Raemaekers, P. M. (1985). Field playback of loud calls to gibbons (Hylobates lar): Territorial, sex-specific and species-specific responses. Animal Behaviour, 33(2), 481–493.Google Scholar

Raemaekers, J. J., Raemaekers, P. M., & Haimoff, E. H. (1984). Loud calls of the gibbon (Hylobates lar): Repertoire, organization and context. Behaviour, 91(1–3), 146–189.Google Scholar

Rawson, B. M., Hoang, M. D., Roos, C., Van, N. T., & Nguyen, M. H. (2020a). Nomascus gabriellae. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T128073282A17968950.Google Scholar

Rawson, B. M., Nguyen, M. H., Coudrat, C. N. Z., Roos, C., Jiang, X. & Duckworth, J. W. (2020b). Nomascus leucogenys (errata version published in 2020). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T39895A180816530.Google Scholar

Rawson, B. M., Roos, C., Nguyen, M. H., Bleisch, W., Geissmann, T., & Fan, P. F. (2020c). Nomascus nasutus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T41642A17969578.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H. (1995). Extra‐pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon (Hylobates lar). Ethology, 100(2), 99–112.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H. (1998). Sleeping sites, sleeping places, and presleep behavior of gibbons (Hylobates lar). American Journal of Primatology, 46(1), 35–62.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H. (2003). Social monogamy in gibbons: The male perspective. In Reichard, U. (Ed.), Monogamy: Mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals (pp. 190–213). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H. (2009). The social organization and mating system of Khao Yai white-handed gibbons: 1992–2006. In Lappan, S. & Whittaker, D. J. (Eds.), The gibbons: A new perspective on small ape socioecology and population biology (pp. 347–384). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H. (2018). Monogamy. In Fuentes, A. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–5). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H., & Barelli, C. (2008). Life history and reproductive strategies of Khao Yai Hylobates lar: Implications for social evolution in apes. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 823–844.Google Scholar

Reichard, U. H., Ganpanakngan, M., & Barelli, C. (2012). White-handed gibbons of Khao Yai: Social flexibility, complex reproductive strategies, and a slow life history. In Kappeler, P. M. & Watts, D. P. (Eds.), Long-term field studies of primates (pp. 237–258). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Reichard, U., & Sommer, V. (1997). Group encounters in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar): Agonism, affiliation, and the concept of infanticide. Behaviour, 134(15–16), 1135–1174.Google Scholar

Rutberg, A. T. (1983). The evolution of monogamy in primates. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 104(1), 93–112.Google Scholar

Savini, T., Boesch, C., & Reichard, U. H. (2009). Varying ecological quality influences the probability of polyandry in white‐handed gibbons (Hylobates lar) in Thailand. Biotropica, 41(4), 503–513.Google Scholar

Schacht, R., & Kramer, K. L. (2019). Are we monogamous? A review of the evolution of pair-bonding in humans and its contemporary variation cross-culturally. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 230.Google Scholar

Schülke, O., & Kappeler, P. M. (2003). So near and yet so far: Territorial pairs but low cohesion between pair partners in a nocturnal lemur, Phaner furcifer. Animal Behaviour, 65(2), 331–343.Google Scholar

Schülke, O., Kappeler, P. M., & Zischler, H. (2004). Small testes size despite high extra-pair paternity in the pair-living nocturnal primate Phaner furcifer. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 55, 293–301.Google Scholar

Sommer, V., & Reichard, U. (2000). Rethinking monogamy: The gibbon case. In Kappeler, P. M. (Ed.), Primate males: Causes and consequences of variation in group composition (pp. 159–168). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Srikosamatara, S. (1984). Ecology of pileated gibbons in south-east Thailand. In Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D. J., Brockelman, W., & Creel, N. (Eds.), The lesser apes: Evolutionary and behavioural ecology (pp. 242–257). Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Srikosamatara, S., & Brockelman, W. Y. (1987). Polygyny in a group of pileated gibbons via a familial route. International Journal of Primatology, 8(4), 389–393.Google Scholar

Steenbeek, R. (1999). Tenure related changes in wild Thomas’s langurs I: Between-group interactions. Behaviour, 136(5), 595–625.Google Scholar

Suddendorf, T., & Collier-Baker, E. (2009). The evolution of primate visual self-recognition: Evidence of absence in lesser apes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276(1662), 1671–1677.Google Scholar

Taber, A. B., & Macdonald, D. W. (1992). Spatial organization and monogamy in the mara Dolichotis patagonum. Journal of Zoology, 227(3), 417–438.Google Scholar

Tecot, S. R., Singletary, B., & Eadie, E. (2016). Why “monogamy” isn’t good enough. American Journal of Primatology, 78(3), 340–354.Google Scholar

Terborgh, J. (1983). Five new world primates: A study in comparative ecology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Terborgh, J., & Janson, C. H. (1986). The socioecology of primate groups. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17(1), 111–136.Google Scholar

Thin, V. N., Roos, C., Rawson, B. M., Nguyen, M. H., Duckworth, J. W., Hoang, M. D.,… & Thien, N. V. (2020). Nomascus annamensis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, 2020, e.T120659170A120659179.Google Scholar

Tilson, R. L. (1981). Family formation strategies of Kloss’s gibbons. Folia Primatologica, 35(4), 259–287.Google Scholar

Treesucon, U., & Raemaekers, J. J. (1984). Group formation in gibbon through displacement of an adult. International Journal of Primatology, 5(4), 387.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Uhde, N. L., & Sommer, V. (2002). Antipredatory behavior in gibbons (Hylobates lar, Khao Yai/Thailand). In Miller, L. E. (Ed.), Eat or be eaten: Predator sensitive foraging among primates (pp. 268–291). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

van Schaik, C. P., & Dunbar, R. I. (1990). The evolution of monogamy in large primates: A new hypothesis and some crucial tests. Behaviour, 115(1–2), 30–61.Google Scholar

Van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Infanticide risk and the evolution of male–female association in primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264(1388), 1687–1694.Google Scholar

Van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M. (2003). The evolution of social monogamy in primates. In Reichard, U. H. (Ed.), Monogamy: Mating strategies and partnerships in birds, humans and other mammals (pp. 59–80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Thien, N., Anh, N. Q. H., Van Ngoc Thinh, L. V. K., & Roos, C. (2017). Distribution of the northern yellow-cheeked gibbon (Nomascus annamensis) in central Vietnam. Vietnamese Journal of Primatology, 2(5), 83–88.Google Scholar

Wickler, W., & Seibt, U. (1983). Monogamy: An ambiguous concept. In Bateson, P. (Ed.), Mate Choice (pp. 33–50). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wittenberger, J. F., & Tilson, R. L. (1980). The evolution of monogamy: Hypotheses and evidence. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11(1), 197–232.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. (1979). On the evolution of ape social systems. Social Science Information, 18(3), 336–368.Google Scholar

Yang, M. (1998). The mating behaviour of captive hoolock gibbons. Chinese Wildlife, 19, 33.Google Scholar

Yi, Y., Fichtel, C., Kim, E., & Choe, J. C. (2020). Impacts of intergroup interactions on intragroup behavioral changes in Javan gibbons (Hylobates moloch). International Journal of Primatology, 41(2), 1–19.Google Scholar

Zheng, R. Q. (1989). A preliminary observation on mating behavior in Hylobates concolor. Zoological Research, 9, 112.Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Wei, F., Li, M., Lok, C. B. P., & Wang, D. (2008). Reproductive characters and mating behaviour of wild Nomascus hainanus. International Journal of Primatology, 29(4), 1037–1046.Google Scholar

References

Ågmo, A., Smith, A. S., Birnie, A. K., & French, J. A. (2012). Behavioral characteristics of pair bonding in the black tufted-ear marmoset (Callithrix penicillata). Behaviour, 149(3–4), 407–440.Google Scholar

Abbott, David H. (1993). Social conflict and reproductive suppression in marmoset and tamarin monkeys. In Mason, W. A. & Mendoza, S. P. (Eds.), Primate Social Conflict (pp. 331–372). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Abbott, D. H. (1984). Behavioral and physiological suppression of fertility in subordinate marmoset monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 6(3), 169–186.Google Scholar

Abbott, David H., Saltzman, W., Schultz-Darken, N. J., & Smith, T. E. (1997). Specific neuroendocrine mechanisms not involving generalized stress mediate social regulation of female reproduction in cooperatively breeding marmoset monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 807(1), 219–238.Google Scholar

Abreu, F., De la Fuente, M. F. C., Schiel, N., & Souto, A. (2016). Feeding ecology and behavioral adjustments: Flexibility of a small neotropical primate (Callithrix jacchus) to survive in a semiarid environment. Mammal Research, 61(3), 221–229.Google Scholar

Albuquerque, A. C. S., Sousa, M. B., Santos, H. M., & Ziegler, T. E. (2001). Behavioral and hormonal analysis of social relationships between oldest females in a wild monogamous group of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). International Journal of Primatology, 22(4), 631–645.Google Scholar

Alonso, C., & Langguth, A. (1989). Ecology and behavior of Callithrix jacchus (Primates: Callitrichidae) living on an Atlantic forest island. Revista Nordestina de Biologia, 6, 105–137.Google Scholar

Anzenberger, G. (1985). How stranger encounters of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) are influenced by family members: The quality of behavior. Folia Primatologica, 45(3–4), 204–224.Google Scholar

Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(3), 319–345.Google Scholar

Arruda, M. F., Araújo, A., Sousa, M. B. C., Albuquerque, F. S., Albuquerque, A. C. S. R., & Yamamoto, M. E. (2005). Two breeding females within free-living groups may not always indicate polygyny: Alternative subordinate female strategies in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica: International Journal of Primatology, 76(1), 10–20.Google Scholar

Barrett, J., Abbott, D. H., & George, L. M. (1990). Extension of reproductive suppression by pheromonal cues in subordinate female marmoset monkeys, Callithrix jacchus. Reproduction, 90(2), 411–418.Google Scholar

Blaustein, J. D., & McCarthy, M. M. (2009). Phoenix, Goy, Gerall, and Young, Endocrinology, 1959: 50 years young and going strong. Endocrinology, 150(6), 2501–2501.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M. (2015). Opposite effects of male and female helpers on social tolerance and proactive prosociality in callitrichid family groups. Scientific Reports, 5(1), 1–9.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M., Fehr, E., Efferson, C., & van Schaik, C. P. (2007). Other-regarding preferences in a non-human primate: Common marmosets provision food altruistically. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(50), 19762–19766.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S. B., & Van Schaik, C. P. (2009). Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews: Issues, News, and Reviews, 18(5), 175–186.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (2016). Revisiting the consequences of cooperative breeding. Journal of Zoology, 299(2), 77–83.Google Scholar

Campbell, S. K., & Cortés-Ortiz, L. (2021). Oxytocin amino acid variation within Neotropical primates: New genetic variants in hormone and receptor sequences and evidence for evolutionary forces driving this unexpected diversity. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 132(1), 211–220.Google Scholar

Carp, S. B., Rothwell, E. S., Bourdon, A., Freeman, S. M., Ferrer, E., & Bales, K. L. (2016). Development of a partner preference test that differentiates between established pair bonds and other relationships in socially monogamous titi monkeys (Callicebus cupreus). American Journal of Primatology, 78(3), 326–339.Google Scholar

Carp, S. B., Taylor, J. H., & French, J. A. (2019). Dopamine receptor manipulation does not alter patterns of partner preference in long-term marmoset pairs. Physiology & Behavior, 204, 290–296.Google Scholar

Carter, C. S., & Perkeybile, A. M. (2018). The monogamy paradox: What do love and sex have to do with it? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6, 202.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, J., Carp, S. B., Rock, C. M., & French, J. A. (2016). Oxytocin modulates behavioral and physiological responses to a stressor in marmoset monkeys. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 66, 22–30.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, J., & French, J. A. (2013). Post-partum variation in the expression of paternal care is unrelated to urinary steroid metabolites in marmoset fathers. Hormones and Behavior, 63(4), 551–558.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, J., Huffman, M. C., Harnisch, A. M., & French, J. A. (2015). Marmosets treated with oxytocin are more socially attractive to their long-term mate. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 251.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, J., Mustoe, A., & French, J. A. (2018). Oxytocin regulates reunion affiliation with a pairmate following social separation in marmosets. American Journal of Primatology, 80(10), e22750.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, J., Mustoe, A. C., Taylor, J. H., & French, J. A. (2014). Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 1–10.Google Scholar

Cavanaugh, J., Mustoe, A., Womack, S. L., & French, J. A. (2018). Oxytocin modulates mate-guarding behavior in marmoset monkeys. Hormones and Behavior, 106, 150–161.Google Scholar

Cavigelli, S. A., & Pereira, M. E. (2000). Mating season aggression and fecal testosterone levels in male ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta). Hormones and Behavior, 37(3), 246–255.Google Scholar

Creel, S., Wildt, D. E., & Monfort, S. L. (1993). Aggression, reproduction, and androgens in wild dwarf mongooses: A test of the challenge hypothesis. The American Naturalist, 141(5), 816–825.Google Scholar

da Silva Mota, M. T., Franci, C. R., & de Sousa, M. B. (2006). Hormonal changes related to paternal and alloparental care in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Hormones and Behavior, 49(3), 293–302.Google Scholar

de Sousa, M. B. C., da Rocha Albuquerque, A. C. S., Yamamoto, M. E., Araújo, A., & de Fátima Arruda, M. (2009). Emigration as a reproductive strategy of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). In Ford, S. M., Porter, L. M., & Davis, L. C. (Eds.), The smallest anthropoids (pp. 167–182). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Digby, L. J. (1999). Sexual behavior and extragroup copulations in a wild population of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica; International Journal of Primatology, 70(3), 136–145.Google Scholar

Digby, L. J. (1995). Social organization in a wild population of Callithrix jacchus: II. Intragroup social behavior. Primates, 36(3), 361–375.Google Scholar

Digby, L. J., & Barreto, C. E. (1993). Social organization in a wild population of Callithrix jacchus. Folia Primatologica, 61(3), 123–134.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F. (1986). Proceptive displays of the female common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus): Effects of ovariectomy and oestradiol 17 beta. Physiology & Behavior, 36(5), 971–973.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F. (1990). Medial hypothalamic lesions and sexual receptivity in the female common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica: International Journal of Primatology, 54(1–2), 46–56.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F. (1993a). Effects of testosterone propionate upon the sexual and aggressive behavior of adult male marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) castrated as neonates. Hormones and Behavior, 27(2), 216–230.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F. (1993b). Sexual and aggressive behaviour of adult male marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) castrated neonatally, prepubertally, or in adulthood. Physiology & Behavior, 54(2), 301–307.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. (2001). The evolution of neuroendocrine mechanisms regulating sexual behaviour in female primates. Reproduction, Fertility, and Development, 13(7–8), 599–607.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F., & Lunn, S. F. (1987). Post-partum changes in hormones and sexual behaviour in captive groups of marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Physiology & Behavior, 41(6), 577–583.Google Scholar

Epple, G. (1993). Making sense out of scents: Species differences in scent glands, scent-marking behavior, and scent-marking composition in Callitrichidae. In Rylands, A. B. (Ed.), Marmosets and tamarins: Systematics, behavior, and ecology (pp. 123–151). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Erb, W. M., & Porter, L. M. (2017). Mother’s little helpers: What we know (and don’t know) about cooperative infant care in callitrichines. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 26(1), 25–37.Google Scholar

Evans, S. (1983). The pair-bond of the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus: An experimental investigation. Animal Behaviour, 31(3), 651–658.Google Scholar

Faulkes, C. G., Arruda, M. F., & Monteiro da Cruz, M. A. O. (2003). Matrilineal genetic structure within and among populations of the cooperatively breeding common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. Molecular Ecology, 12(4), 1101–1108.Google Scholar

Fernandez-Duque, E., Huck, M., Van Belle, S., & Di Fiore, A. (2020). The evolution of pair-living, sexual monogamy, and cooperative infant care: Insights from research on wild owl monkeys, titis, sakis, and tamarins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 171, 118–173.Google Scholar

Ferrari, S. F. (1992). The care of infants in a wild marmoset (Callithrix flaviceps) group. American Journal of Primatology, 26(2), 109–118.Google Scholar

Ferrari, S. F., & Ferrari, M. A. L. (1989). A re-evaluation of the social organisation of the Callitrichidae, with reference to the ecological differences between genera. Folia Primatologica, 52(3–4), 132–147.Google Scholar

Ferris, C. F., Snowdon, C. T., King, J. A., Duong, T. Q., Ziegler, T. E., Ugurbil, K., … & Vaughan, J. T. (2001). Functional imaging of brain activity in conscious monkeys responding to sexually arousing cues. Neuroreport, 12(10), 2231–2236.Google Scholar

Ferris, C. F., Snowdon, C. T., King, J. A., Sullivan, J. M., Ziegler, T. E., Olson, D. P., … & Duong, T. Q. (2004). Activation of neural pathways associated with sexual arousal in non-human primates. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 19(2), 168–175.Google Scholar

Finkenwirth, C., & Burkart, J. M. (2017). Long-term-stability of relationship structure in family groups of common marmosets, and its link to proactive prosociality. Physiology & Behavior, 173, 79–86.Google Scholar

Finkenwirth, C., Martins, E., Deschner, T., & Burkart, J. M. (2016). Oxytocin is associated with infant-care behavior and motivation in cooperatively breeding marmoset monkeys. Hormones and Behavior, 80, 10–18.Google Scholar

Finkenwirth, C., van Schaik, C., Ziegler, T. E., & Burkart, J. M. (2015). Strongly bonded family members in common marmosets show synchronized fluctuations in oxytocin. Physiology & Behavior, 151, 246–251.Google Scholar

Fite, J. E., Patera, K. J., French, J. A., Rukstalis, M., Hopkins, E. C., & Ross, C. N. (2005). Opportunistic mothers: Female marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii) reduce their investment in offspring when they have to, and when they can. Journal of Human Evolution, 49(1), 122–142.Google Scholar

French, J. A. (1997). Regulation of singular breeding in callitrichid primates. In Solomon, N. G. & French, J. A. (Eds.), Cooperative breeding in mammals (pp. 34–75). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

French, J. A., Mustoe, A. C., Cavanaugh, J., & Birnie, A. K. (2013). The influence of androgenic steroid hormones on female aggression in “atypical” mammals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 368(1631), 20130084.Google Scholar

French, J. A., Taylor, J. H., Mustoe, A. C., & Cavanaugh, J. (2016). Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 42, 18–39.Google Scholar

Garber, P. A. (1992). Vertical clinging, small body size, and the evolution of feeding adaptations in the Callitrichinae. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88(4), 469–482.Google Scholar

Garbino, G. S., & Martins-Junior, A. M. (2018). Phenotypic evolution in marmoset and tamarin monkeys (Cebidae, Callitrichinae) and a revised genus-level classification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 118, 156–171.Google Scholar

Gibson, K. N. (2010). Male mating tactics in spider monkeys: Sneaking to compete. American Journal of Primatology, 72(9), 794–804.Google Scholar

Goldizen, A. W. (1990). A comparative perspective on the evolution of tamarin and marmoset social systems. International Journal of Primatology, 11(1), 63–83.Google Scholar

Hubrecht, R. C. (1985). Home-range size and use and territorial behavior in the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus, at the Tapacura Field Station, Recife, Brazil. International Journal of Primatology, 6(5), 533–550.Google Scholar

Johnson, E. O., Kamilaris, T. C., Carter, S., Gold, P. W., & Chrousos, G. P. (1991). Environmental stress and reproductive success in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 25(3), 191–201.Google Scholar

Jurek, B., & Neumann, I. D. (2018). The oxytocin receptor: From intracellular signaling to behavior. Physiological Reviews, 98(3), 1805–1908.Google Scholar

Kendrick, K. M., & Dixson, A. F. (1983). The effect of the ovarian cycle on the sexual behaviour of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Physiology & Behavior, 30(5), 735–742.Google Scholar

Kendrick, K. M., & Dixson, A. F. (1984). A quantitative description of copulatory and associated behaviors of captive marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). International Journal of Primatology, 5(3), 199–212.Google Scholar

Kendrick, K. M., & Dixson, A. F. (1985). Effects of oestradiol 17B, progesterone and testosterone upon proceptivity and receptivity in ovariectomized common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Physiology & Behavior, 34(1), 123–128.Google Scholar

Kotani, M., Shimono, K., Yoneyama, T., Nakako, T., Matsumoto, K., Ogi, Y., Konoike, N., Nakamura, K., & Ikeda, K. (2017). An eye tracking system for monitoring face scanning patterns reveals the enhancing effect of oxytocin on eye contact in common marmosets. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 83, 42–48.Google Scholar

Kraynak, M., Colman, R. J., Flowers, M. T., Abbott, D. H., & Levine, J. E. (2019 ). Ovarian estradiol supports sexual behavior but not energy homeostasis in female marmoset monkeys. International Journal of Obesity, 43(5), 1034–1045.Google Scholar

Kuzawa, C. W., Gettler, L. T., Muller, M. N., McDade, T. W., & Feranil, A. B. (2009). Fatherhood, pairbonding and testosterone in the Philippines. Hormones and Behavior, 56(4), 429–435.Google Scholar

la Fuente, D., Castellón, M. F., Souto, A., Sampaio, M. B., & Schiel, N. (2014). Behavioral adjustments by a small Neotropical primate (Callithrix jacchus) in a semiarid Caatinga environment. The Scientific World Journal. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/326524 Google Scholar

Lazaro-Perea, C. (2001). Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: Territorial defence and assessment of neighbours. Animal Behaviour, 62(1), 11–21.Google Scholar

Lazaro-Perea, C., Castro, C. S., Harrison, R., Araujo, A., Arruda, M. F., & Snowdon, C. T. (2000). Behavioral and demographic changes following the loss of the breeding female in cooperatively breeding marmosets. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48(2), 137–146.Google Scholar

Lazaro-Perea, C., de Fátima Arruda, M., & Snowdon, C. T. (2004). Grooming as a reward? Social function of grooming between females in cooperatively breeding marmosets. Animal Behaviour, 67(4), 627–636.Google Scholar

Lazaro-Perea, C., Snowdon, C. T., & de Fátima Arruda, M. (1999). Scent-marking behavior in wild groups of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 46(5), 313–324.Google Scholar

Lee, A. G., Cool, D. R., Grunwald, W. C. Jr., Neal, D. E., Buckmaster, C. L., Cheng, M., … & Parker, K. J. (2011). A novel form of oxytocin in New World monkeys. Biology Letters, 7(4), 584–587.Google Scholar

Lloyd, S. A., & Dixson, A. F. (1988). Effects of hypothalamic lesions upon the sexual and social behaviour of the male common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Brain Research, 463(2), 317–329.Google Scholar

Lúcio Nogueira, S., Cordeiro de Sousa, M. B., de Medeiros Neto, C. F., & da Paz de Oliveira Costa, M. (2001). Diurnal variation in scent marking behavior in captive male and female common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Biological Rhythm Research, 32(2), 169–177.Google Scholar

Lukas, D., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2013). The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science, 341(6145), 526–530.Google Scholar

Lunn, S. F., & McNeilly, A. S. (1982). Failure of lactation to have a consistent effect on interbirth interval in the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus jacchus. Folia Primatologica, 37(1–2), 99–105.Google Scholar

Lunn, S. F., Recio, R., Morris, K., & Fraser, H. M. (1994). Blockade of the neonatal rise in testosterone by a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist: Effects on timing of puberty and sexual behaviour in the male marmoset monkey. Journal of Endocrinology, 141(3), 439–447.Google Scholar

Michels, A. M. (1998). Sex differences in food acquisition and aggression in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Primates, 39(4), 549.Google Scholar

Mustoe, A. C., Cavanaugh, J., Harnisch, A. M., Thompson, B. E., & French, J. A. (2015). Do marmosets care to share? Oxytocin treatment reduces prosocial behavior toward strangers. Hormones and Behavior, 71, 83–90.Google Scholar

Mustoe, A. C., Harnisch, A. M., Hochfelder, B., Cavanaugh, J., & French, J. A. (2016). Inequity aversion strategies between marmosets are influenced by partner familiarity and sex but not by oxytocin. Animal Behaviour, 114, 69–79.Google Scholar

Mustoe, A., Schulte, N. A., Taylor, J. H., French, J. A., & Toews, M. L. (2019). Leu 8 and Pro 8 oxytocin agonism differs across human, macaque, and marmoset vasopressin 1a receptors. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Mustoe, A., Taylor, J. H., & French, J. A. (2018). Oxytocin structure and function in New World monkeys: From pharmacology to behavior. Integrative Zoology, 13(6), 634–654.Google Scholar

Nievergelt, C. M., Digby, L. J., Ramakrishnan, U., & Woodruff, D. S. (2000). Genetic analysis of group composition and breeding system in a wild common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) population. International Journal of Primatology, 21(1), 1–20.Google Scholar

Nunes, S., Fite, J. E., Patera, K. J., & French, J. A. (2001). Interactions among paternal behavior, steroid hormones, and parental experience in male marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii). Hormones and Behavior, 39(1), 70–82.Google Scholar

Overduin-de Vries, A. M., Massen, J. J. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2012). Sneaky monkeys: An audience effect of male rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) on sexual behavior. American Journal of Primatology, 74(3), 217–228.Google Scholar

Phoenix, C. H., Goy, R. W., Gerall, A. A., & Young, W. C. (1959). Organizing action of prenatally administered testosterone propionate on the tissues mediating mating behavior in the female guinea pig. Endocrinology, 65(3), 369–382.Google Scholar

Price, E. C. (1990). Infant carrying as a courtship strategy of breeding male cotton-top tamarins. Animal Behaviour, 40(4), 784–786.Google Scholar

Ren, D., Lu, G., Moriyama, H., Mustoe, A. C., Harrison, E. B., & French, J. A. (2015). Genetic diversity in oxytocin ligands and receptors in New World monkeys. PLOS ONE, 10(5), e0125775.Google Scholar

Ross, C. N., & French, J. A. (2011). Female marmosets’ behavioral and hormonal responses to unfamiliar intruders. American Journal of Primatology, 73(10), 1072–1081.Google Scholar

Ross, C. N., French, J. A., & Patera, K. J. (2004). Intensity of aggressive interactions modulates testosterone in male marmosets. Physiology & Behavior, 83(3), 437–445.Google Scholar

Rothe, H. (1975). Some aspects of sexuality and reproduction in groups of captive marmosets (Callitbrix jacchus). Zeitschrift Fur Tierpsychologie, 37(3), 255–273.Google Scholar

Rukstalis, M., & French, J. A. (2005). Vocal buffering of the stress response: Exposure to conspecific vocalizations moderates urinary cortisol excretion in isolated marmosets. Hormones and Behavior, 47(1), 1–7.Google Scholar

Saito, A., & Nakamura, K. (2011). Oxytocin changes primate paternal tolerance to offspring in food transfer. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 197(4), 329–337.Google Scholar

Saltzman, W., Liedl, K. J., Salper, O. J., Pick, R. R., & Abbott, D. H. (2008). Post-conception reproductive competition in cooperatively breeding common marmosets. Hormones and Behavior, 53(1), 274–286.Google Scholar

Saltzman, W., Schultz Darken, N. J., & Abbott, D. H. (1997). Familial influences on ovulatory function in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 41(3), 159–177.Google Scholar

Scanlon, C. E., Chalmers, N. R., & Da Cruz, M. M. (1988). Changes in the size, composition, and reproductive condition of wild marmoset groups (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) in north east Brazil. Primates, 29(3), 295–305.Google Scholar

Schaffner, C. M., Shepherd, R. E., Santos, C. V., & French, J. A. (1995). Development of heterosexual relationships in Wied’s black tufted ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhli). American Journal of Primatology, 36(3), 185–200.Google Scholar

Schiel, N., & Huber, L. (2006). Social influences on the development of foraging behavior in free-living common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 68(12), 1150–1160.Google Scholar

Schiel, N., & Souto, A. (2017). The common marmoset: An overview of its natural history, ecology and behavior. Developmental Neurobiology, 77(3), 244–262.Google Scholar

Smith, A. S., Agmo, A., Birnie, A. K., & French, J. A. (2010). Manipulation of the oxytocin system alters social behavior and attraction in pair-bonding primates, Callithrix penicillata. Hormones and Behavior, 57(2), 255–262.Google Scholar

Smith, T. E., & Abbott, D. H. (1998). Behavioral discrimination between circumgenital odor from peri-ovulatory dominant and anovulatory female common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). American Journal of Primatology, 46(4), 265–284.Google Scholar

Smith, T. E., McGreer-Whitworth, B., & French, J. A. (1998). Close proximity of the heterosexual partner reduces the physiological and behavioral consequences of novel-cage housing in black tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhli). Hormones and Behavior, 34(3), 211–222.Google Scholar

Snowdon, C. T. (1996). Infant care in cooperatively breeding species. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 25, 643–689.Google Scholar

Snowdon, C. T., Tannenbaum, P. L., Schultz-Darken, N. J., Ziegler, T. E., & Ferris, C. F. (2011). Conditioned sexual arousal in a nonhuman primate. Hormones and Behavior, 59(5), 696–701.Google Scholar

Snowdon, C. T., & Ziegler, T. E. (2007). Growing up cooperatively: Family processes and infant care in marmosets and tamarins. Journal of Developmental Processes, 2(1), 40–66.Google Scholar

Sousa, M. B. C., Albuquerque, A. C. S. da R., Albuquerque, F. da S., Araujo, A., Yamamoto, M. E., & Arruda, M. de F. (2005). Behavioral strategies and hormonal profiles of dominant and subordinate common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) females in wild monogamous groups. American Journal of Primatology, 67(1), 37–50.Google Scholar

Stevenson, M. F., & Poole, T. B. (1976). An ethogram of the common marmoset (Calithrix jacchus jacchus): General behavioural repertoire. Animal Behaviour, 24(2), 428–451.Google Scholar

Sutcliffe, A. G., & Poole, T. B. (1978). Scent marking and associated behaviour in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) with a description of the histology of scent glands. Journal of Zoology, 185(1), 41–56.Google Scholar

Taniguchi, K., Matsusaki, Y., Ogawa, K., & Saito, T. R. (1992). Fine structure of the vomeronasal organ in the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica, 59(3), 169–176.Google Scholar

Tardif, S. D., & Bales, K. (1997). Is infant-carrying a courtship strategy in callitrichid primates? Animal Behaviour, 53(5), 1001–1007.Google Scholar

Tardif, S. D., Carson, R. L., & Gangaware, B. L. (1986). Comparison of infant care in family groups of the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) and the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus). American Journal of Primatology, 11(2), 103–110.Google Scholar

Tardif, S. D., Smucny, D. A., Abbott, D. H., Mansfield, K., Schultz-Darken, N., & Yamamoto, M. E. (2003). Reproduction in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Comparative Medicine, 53(4), 364–368.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. H., Carp, S. B., & French, J. A. (2020). Vasopressin, but not oxytocin, modulates responses to infant stimuli in marmosets providing care to dependent infants. Developmental Psychobiology, 62(7), 932–940.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. H., & French, J. A. (2015). Oxytocin and vasopressin enhance responsiveness to infant stimuli in adult marmosets. Hormones and Behavior, 75, 154–159.Google Scholar

Taylor, J. H., Intorre, A. A., & French, J. A. (2017). Vasopressin and oxytocin reduce food sharing behavior in male, but not female marmosets in family groups. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 8, 181.Google Scholar

Tecot, S. R., Singletary, B., & Eadie, E. (2016). Why “monogamy” isn’t good enough. American Journal of Primatology, 78(3), 340–354.Google Scholar

Thompson, C. L., Bottenberg, K. N., Lantz, A. W., de Oliveira, M. A., Melo, L. C., & Vinyard, C. J. (2020). What smells? Developing in-field methods to characterize the chemical composition of wild mammalian scent cues. Ecology and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6224 Google Scholar

Vargas-Pinilla, P., Paixão-Côrtes, V. R., Paré, P., Tovo-Rodrigues, L., Vieira, C. M., Xavier, A., … & Bortolini, M. C. (2015). Evolutionary pattern in the OXT-OXTR system in primates: Coevolution and positive selection footprints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(1), 88–93.Google Scholar

Wallen, K. (2001). Sex and context: Hormones and primate sexual motivation. Hormones and Behavior, 40(2), 339–357.Google Scholar

Wallis, M. (2012). Molecular evolution of the neurohypophysial hormone precursors in mammals: Comparative genomics reveals novel mammalian oxytocin and vasopressin analogues. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 179(2), 313–318.Google Scholar

Wingfield, J. C., Ball, G. F., Dufty, A. M., Hegner, R. E., & Ramenofsky, M. (1987). Testosterone and aggression in birds. American Scientist, 75(6), 602–608.Google Scholar

Wingfield, J. C., Goymann, W., Jalabert, C., & Soma, K. K. (2020). Reprint of “Concepts derived from the Challenge Hypothesis.” Hormones and Behavior, 115, 104802.Google Scholar

Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M. Jr., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “Challenge Hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136(6), 829–846.Google Scholar

Wislocki, G. B. (1930). A study of scent glands in the marmosets, especially Oedipomidas geoffroyi. Journal of Mammalogy, 11(4), 475–483.Google Scholar

Woodcock, A. J. (1982). The first weeks of cohabitation of newly-formed heterosexual pairs of common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Folia Primatologica; International Journal of Primatology, 37(3–4), 228–254.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, M. E. (2003). From dependence to sexual maturity: The behavioural ontogeny of Callitrichidae. In Rylands, A. B. (Ed.), Marmosets and tamarins: Systematics, behaviour and ecology. (pp. 235–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Yamamoto, M. E., de Fátima Arruda, M., Alencar, A. I., de Sousa, M. B. C., & Araújo, A. (2009). Mating systems and female–female competition in the common marmoset, Callithrix jacchus. In Ford, S. M., Porter, L. M., & Davis, L. C., The smallest anthropoids (pp. 119–133). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Young, L. J., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of pair bonding. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1048–1054.Google Scholar

Ziegler, T. E., Prudom, S. L., & Zahed, S. R. (2009). Variations in male parenting behavior and physiology in the common marmoset. American Journal of Human Biology, 21(6), 739–744.Google Scholar

Ziegler, T. E., Schultz-Darken, N. J., Scott, J. J., Snowdon, C. T., & Ferris, C. F. (2005). Neuroendocrine response to female ovulatory odors depends upon social condition in male common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus. Hormones and Behavior, 47(1), 56–64.Google Scholar

References

Alberts, S., Watts, H. E., & Altmann, J. (2003). Queuing and queue-jumping: long-term patterns of reproductive skew in male savannah baboons, Papio cynocephalus. Animal Behaviour, 65, 821–840.Google Scholar

Altmann, J. (1979). Age cohorts as paternal sibships. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 6, 161–164.Google Scholar

Barrett, B. J., Monteza-Moreno, C. M., Dogandžić, T., Zwyns, N., Ibáñez, A., & Crofoot, M. C. (2018). Habitual stone-tool-aided extractive foraging in white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. Royal Society Open Science, 5, 181002.Google Scholar

Bergstrom, M. L., & Fedigan, L. M. (2010). Dominance among female white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus): Hierarchical linearity, nepotism, strength and stability. Behaviour, 147, 899–931.Google Scholar

Brasington, L. F., Wikberg, E. C., Kawamura, S., Fedigan, L. M., & Jack, K. M. (2017). Infant mortality in white-faced capuchins: The impact of alpha male replacements. American Journal of Primatology, 79, 22725.Google Scholar

Carnegie, S. D., Fedigan, L. M., & Melin, A. D. (2011). Reproductive seasonality in female capuchins (Cebus capucinus) in Santa Rosa (Area de Conservación Guanacaste), Costa Rica. International Journal of Primatology, 32, 1076–1090.Google Scholar

Carnegie, S. D., Fedigan, L. M., & Ziegler, T. E. (2005). Behavioral indicators of ovarian phase in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Primatology, 67, 51–68.Google Scholar

Carnegie, S. D., Fedigan, L. M., & Ziegler, T. (2006). Post-conceptive mating in white-faced capuchins: Hormonal and sociosexual patterns in cycling, non-cycling and pregnant females. In Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Pavelka, M. S. M., & Luecke, L. (Eds.), New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates: Distribution, ecology, behavior and conservation (pp. 387–409). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Carosi, M., Linn, G. S., & Visalberghi, E. (2005). The sexual behavior and breeding system of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Advances in the Study of Behavior, 35, 105–149.Google Scholar

Carosi, M., & Visalberghi, E. (2002). Analysis of tufted capuchin (Cebus apella) courtship and sexual behavior repertoire: Changes throughout the female cycle and female interindividual differences. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 118, 11–24.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1989). Female transfer and inbreeding avoidance in social mammals. Nature, 337, 70–72.Google Scholar

Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1976). Evolutionary rules and primate societies. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A. (Eds.), Growing points in ethology (pp. 195–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Di Bitetti, M. S. (1997). Evidence for an important social role of allogrooming in a platyrrhine primate. Animal Behaviour, 54, 199–211.Google Scholar

Di Bitetti, M. S., & Janson, C. H. (2000). When will the stork arrive? Patterns of birth seasonality in neotropical primates. American Journal of Primatology, 50(2), 109–130.Google Scholar

Di Bitetti, M. S., & Janson, C. H. (2001). Reproductive socioecology of tufted capuchins (Cebus apella nigritus) in Northeastern Argentina. International Journal of Primatology, 22(2), 127–142.Google Scholar

Escobar-Páramo, P. (2000). Inbreeding avoidance and the evolution of male mating strategies. Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, Stony Brook.Google Scholar

Falótico, T., & Ottoni, E. B. (2013). Stone throwing as a sexual display in wild female bearded capuchin monkeys, Sapajus libidinosus. PLOS ONE, 8, e79535.Google Scholar

Fedigan, L. M. (2003). Impact of male takeovers on infant deaths, births and conceptions in Cebus capucinus at Santa Rosa, Costa Rica. International Journal of Primatology, 24, 723–741.Google Scholar

Fedigan, L. M., & Jack, K. M. (2004). The demographic and reproductive context of male replacements in Cebus capucinus. Behaviour, 141, 755–775.Google Scholar

Fedigan, L. M., & Jack, K. M. (2012). Tracking monkeys in Santa Rosa: Long-term lessons from a regenerating tropical dry forest. In Kappeler, P. M. & Watts, D. P. (Eds.), Long-term field studies of primates (pp. 165–184). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Fichtel, C., Perry, S., & Gros-Louis, J. (2005). Alarm calls of white-faced capuchin monkeys: An acoustic analysis. Animal Behaviour, 70, 165–176.Google Scholar

Ford, S. M., & Davis, L. (1992). Systematics and body size: Implications for feeding adaptations in New World monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 88, 415–468.Google Scholar

Fragaszy, D. M., Izar, P., Liu, Q., Eshchar, Y., Young, L. A., & Visalberghi, E. (2016). Body mass in wild bearded capuchins (Sapajus libidinosus): Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism. American Journal of Primatology, 78, 473–484.Google Scholar

Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E., & Fedigan, L. M. (2004). The complete capuchin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Freese, C. H., & Oppenheimer, J. R. (1981). The capuchin monkey, genus Cebus. In Coimbra-Filho, A. F. & Mittermeier, R. A. (Eds.), Ecology and behavior of neotropical primates (pp. 331–390). Rio de Janeiro: Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.Google Scholar

Godoy, I., Vigilant, L., & Perry, S. (2016a). Cues to kinship and close relatedness during infancy in white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. Animal Behaviour, 116, 139–151.Google Scholar

Godoy, I., Vigilant, L., & Perry, S. (2016b). Inbreeding risk, avoidance and costs in a group-living primate, Cebus capucinus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70, 1601–1611.Google Scholar

Gould, L., Fedigan, L. M., & Rose, L. M. (1997). Why be vigilant? The case of the alpha animal. International Journal of Primatology, 18(3), 401–414.Google Scholar

Goymann, W., & Wingfield, J. C. (2004). Allostatic load, social status and stress hormones: the costs of social status matter. Animal Behaviour, 67, 591–602.Google Scholar

Gros-Louis, J., Perry, S., & Manson, J. H. (2003). Violent coalitionary attacks and intraspecific killing in wild white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). Primates, 44, 341–346.Google Scholar

Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–51.Google Scholar

Harcourt, A. H., Harvey, P. H., Larson, S. G., & Short, R. V. (1981). Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature, 293, 55–57.Google Scholar

Hartwig, W. C. (1996). Perinatal life history traits in New World monkeys. American Journal of Primatology, 40, 99–130.Google Scholar

Hershkovitz, P. (1955). Notes on the American monkeys of the genus Cebus. Journal of Mammalogy, 36, 449–452.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (1974). Male–male competition and infanticide among the langurs (Presbytis entellus) of Abu, Rajasthan. Folia Primatologica, 22, 19–58.Google Scholar

Izar, P., & Nakai, E. (2006). Fission-fusion in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 226.Google Scholar

Izar, P., Stone, A., Carnegie, S., and Nakai, É. (2009). Sexual selection, female choice and mating systems. In Garber, P. A., Estrada, A., Bicca-Marques, J. C., Heymann, E. W., & Strier, K. B. (Eds.), South American Primates. Comparative perspectives in the study of behavior, ecology, and conservation (pp. 157–189). Chicago: Springer.Google Scholar

Izar, P., Verderane, M. P., Peternelli-dos-Santos, L., Mendonça-Furtado, O., Presotto, A., Tokuda, M., … & Fragaszy, D. (2012). Flexible and conservative features of social systems in tufted capuchin monkeys: Comparing the socioecology of Sapajus libidinosus and Sapajus nigritus. American Journal of Primatology, 74, 315–331.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M. (2003). Explaining variation in affiliative relationships among male white-faced capuchins. Folia Primatologica, 74, 1–16.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., & Fedigan, L. M. (2004a). Male dispersal patterns in white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. Part 1: Patterns and causes of natal emigration. Animal Behaviour, 67, 761–769.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., & Fedigan, L. M. (2004b). Male dispersal patterns in white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. Part 2: Patterns and causes of secondary dispersal. Animal Behaviour, 67, 771–782.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., & Fedigan, L. M. (2006). Why be alpha male? Dominance and reproductive success in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). In Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Pavelka, M. S. M., & Luecke, L. (Eds.), New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates: Distribution, ecology, behavior, and conservation (pp. 367–386). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., & Fedigan, L. M. (2009). Female dispersal in a female-philopatric species, Cebus capucinus. Behaviour, 146, 471–497.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., & Fedigan, L. M. (2018 ). Alpha male capuchins (Cebus capucinus imitator) as keystone individuals. In Kalbitzer, U. & Jack, K. M. (Eds.), Primate life histories, sex roles, and adaptability: Essays in honour of Linda M. Fedigan (pp. 91–115). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., Schoof, V. A. M., Sheller, C. R., Rich, C. I., Klingelhofer, P. P., Ziegler, T. E., & Fedigan, L. M. (2014). Hormonal correlates of male life history stages in wild whitefaced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). General and Comparative Endocrinology, 195, 58–67.Google Scholar

Jack, K. M., Sheller, C., & Fedigan, L. M. (2012). Social factors influencing natal dispersal in male white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Primatology, 74, 359–365.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H. (1984). Female choice and mating system of the brown capuchin monkey Cebus apella (Primates: Cebidae). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 65(3), 177–200.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H. (1985). Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behavioral Ecology & Sociobiology, 18(2), 125–138.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H. (1986). The mating system as a determinant of social evolution in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). In Else, J. & Lee, P. C. (Eds.), Primate ecology and conservation (Vol. II, pp. 169–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H., Baldovino, M. C., & Di Bitetti, M. (2012). The group life cycle and demography of brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus [apella] nigritus) in Iguazú National Park, Argentina. In Kappeler, P. M. & Watts, D. P. (Eds.), Long-Term Field Studies of Primates (pp. 185–212). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

Janson, C. H., & Verdolin, J. (2005). In Brockman, D. K. & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Seasonality in primates: Studies of living and extinct human and nonhuman primates (pp. 307–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lynch, J. W., Ziegler, T. E., & Strier, K. B. (2002). Individual and seasonal variation in fecal testosterone and cortisol levels of wild male tufted capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella nigritus. Hormones and Behavior, 41, 275–287.Google Scholar

Lynch Alfaro, J. W. (2005). Male mating strategies and reproductive constraints in a group of wild tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). American Journal of Primatology, 67, 313–328.Google Scholar

Lynch Alfaro, J. W., Silva, J. D. S. E. Jr., & Rylands, A. B. (2012). How different are robust and gracile capuchin monkeys? An argument for the use of Sapajus and Cebus. American Journal of Primatology, 74, 273–286.Google Scholar

Manson, J. H. (2010). Mate choice. In Campbell, C. J., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M., Fuentes, A., & Bearder, S. (Eds.), Primates in Perspective, 2nd ed. (pp. 476–488). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Manson, J. H., & Perry, S. (2013). Personality structure, sex differences, and temporal change and stability in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127, 299–311.Google Scholar

Manson, J. H., Perry, S., & Parish, A. R. (1997). Nonconceptive sexual behavior in bonobos and capuchins. International Journal of Primatology, 18(5), 767–786.Google Scholar

Mendonça-Furtado, O., Edaes, M., Palme, R., Rodrigues, A., Siqueira, J., & Izar, P. (2014). Does hierarchy stability influence testosterone and cortisol levels of bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) adult males? A comparison between two wild groups. Behavioural Processes, 109, 79–88.Google Scholar

Morton, F. B., Lee, P. C., Buchanan-Smith, H. M., Brosnan, S. F., Thierry, B., Paukner, A., & Weiss, A. (2013). Personality structure in brown capuchin monkeys (Sapajus apella): Comparisons with chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), orangutans (Pongo spp.), and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 127, 282–298.Google Scholar

Muniz, L. (2008). Genetic analyses of wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar

Muniz, L., Perry, S., Manson, J. H., Gilkenson, H., Gros-Louis, J., & Vigilant, L. (2006). Father–daughter inbreeding avoidance in a wild primate population. Current Biology, 16, R156–R157.Google Scholar

Muniz, L., Perry, S., Manson, J. H., Gilkenson, H., Gros-Louis, J., & Vigilant, L. (2010). Male dominance and reproductive success in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus) at Lomas Barbudal, Costa Rica. American Journal of Primatology, 72, 1118–1130.Google Scholar

Nunn, C. L. (1999). The evolution of exaggerated sexual swellings in primates and the graded-signal hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 58(2), 229–246.Google Scholar

O’Brien, T. G., & Robinson, J. G. (1991). Allomaternal care by female wedge-capped capuchin monkeys: Effects of age, rank and relatedness. Behaviour, 119(1–2), 30–50.Google Scholar

Ottoni, E. B., & Mannu, M. (2001). Semifree-ranging tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) spontaneously use tools to crack open nuts. International Journal of Primatology, 22, 347–358.Google Scholar

Panger, M., Perry, S., Rose, L. M., Gros-Louis, J., Vogel, E., Mackinnon, K. C., & Baker, M. (2002). Cross-site differences in foraging behavior of white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 119, 52–66.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (1996a). Female–female social relationships in wild white-faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus. American Journal of Primatology, 40(2), 167–182.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (1996b). Intergroup encounters in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). International Journal of Primatology, 17(3), 309–330.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (1997). Male–female social relationships in wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Behaviour, 134(7–8), 477–510.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (1998a). A case report of a male rank reversal in a group of wild white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Primates, 39(1), 51–70.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (1998b). Male–male social relationships in wild white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. Behaviour, 135(2), 139–172.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (2011). Social traditions and social learning in capuchin monkeys (Cebus). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 366, 988–996.Google Scholar

Perry, S. (2012). The behavior of wild white-faced capuchins: Demography, life history, social relationships, and communication. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 44, 135–181.Google Scholar

Perry, S., Barrett, B. J., & Godoy, I. (2017). Older, sociable capuchins (Cebus capucinus) invent more social behaviors, but younger monkeys innovate more in other contexts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114, 7806–7813.Google Scholar

Perry, S., Godoy, I., & Lammers, W. (2012). The Lomas Barbudal Monkey Project: Two decades of research on Cebus capucinus. In Kappeler, P. M. & Watts, D. P. (Eds.), Long-term field studies of primates (pp. 141–165). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Perry, S., Godoy, I., Lammers, W., & Lin, A. (2017). Impact of personality traits and early life experience on timing of emigration and rise to alpha male status for wild male white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus) at Lomas Barbudal Biological Reserve, Costa Rica. Behaviour, 154, 195–226.Google Scholar

Perry, S., & Manson, J. H. (2008). Manipulative monkeys: The capuchins of Lomas Barbudal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Perry, S., Manson, J. H., Muniz, L., Gros-Louis, J., & Vigilant, L. (2008). Kin-biased social behaviour in wild adult female white-faced capuchins, Cebus capucinus. Animal Behaviour, 76, 187–199.Google Scholar

Perry, S., & Rose, L. M. (1994). Begging and transfer of coati meat by white-faced capuchin monkeys Cebus capucinus. Primates, 35(4), 409–415.Google Scholar

Phillips, K. A., Bernstein, I. S., Dettmer, E. L., Devermann, H., & Powers, M. (1994). Sexual behavior in brown capuchins (Cebus apella). International Journal of Primatology, 15, 907–917.Google Scholar

Ramírez-Llorens, P., Di Bitetti, M., Baldovino, M. C., & Janson, C. H. (2008). Infanticide in black capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus) in Iguazú National Park, Argentina. American Journal of Primatology, 70, 473–484.Google Scholar

Rose, L. M. (1997). Vertebrate predation and food-sharing in Cebus and Pan. International Journal of Primatology, 18(5), 727–765.Google Scholar

Rufo, H. P., & Ottoni, E. B. (2021). Anecdotic observations of homosexual behaviour among male capuchin monkeys (Sapajus sp.). Behaviour, 158, 89–97.Google Scholar

Schaebs, F. S., Perry, S., Cohen, D., Mundry, R., & Deschner, T. (2017). Social and demographic correlates of male androgen levels in wild white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Primatology, 79, e22653.Google Scholar

Schoof, V. A. M., & Jack, K. M. (2013). The association of intergroup encounters, dominance status, and fecal androgen and glucocorticoid profiles in wild male white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). American Journal of Primatology, 75, 107–115.Google Scholar

Schoof, V. A. M., Jack, K. M., & Ziegler, T. E. (2014a). Male response to female ovulation in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus): Variation in fecal testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and glucocorticoids. International Journal of Primatology, 35, 643–660.Google Scholar

Schoof, V. A. M., Wikberg, E. C., Jack, K. M., Fedigan, L. M., Ziegler, T. E., & Kawamura, S. (2014b). Infanticides during periods of social stability: Kinship, resumption of ovarian cycling, and mating access in white-faced capuchins (Cebus capucinus). Neotropical Primates, 21, 191–195.Google Scholar

Spagnoletti, N., Visalberghi, E., Verderane, M. P., Ottoni, E. B., Izar, P., & Fragaszy, D. (2012). Stone tool use in wild bearded capuchin monkeys, Cebus libidinosus: Is it a strategy to overcome food scarcity? Animal Behaviour, 83, 1285–1294.Google Scholar

Steiper, M. E., & Young, N. M. (2006). Primate molecular divergence dates. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 41, 384–394.Google Scholar

Stephan, H., Barbon, G., & Frahm, H. D. (1988). Comparative size of brains and brain components. In Steklis, H. D. & Erwin, J. (Eds.), Comparative primate biology (Vol. 4, pp. 1–39). New York: Wiley-Liss.Google Scholar

Tiddi, B., Heistermann, M., Fahy, M. K., & Wheeler, B. C. (2018). Male resource defense mating system in primates? An experimental test in wild capuchin monkeys. PLOS ONE, 13, e0197020.Google Scholar

Tiddi, B., Wheeler, B. C., & Heistermann, M. (2015). Female behavioral proceptivity functions as a probabilistic signal of fertility, not female quality, in a New World primate. Hormones and Behavior, 73, 148–155.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Visalberghi, E., Di Bernardi, C., Marino, L. A., Fragaszy, D., & Izar, P. (2017). Female bearded capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) use objects to solicit the sexual partner. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 131, 207–213.Google Scholar

Weaver, A. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2000). The development of reconciliation in brown capuchins. In Aureli, F. & de Waal, F. B. M. (Eds.), Natural conflict resolution (pp. 216–218). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Westermarck, E. (1891). The history of human marriage. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Wikberg, E. C., Jack, K. M., Fedigan, L. M., Campos, F. A., Yashima, A. S., Bergstrom, M. L., … & Kawamura, S. (2017). Inbreeding avoidance and female mate choice shape reproductive skew in capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus imitator). Molecular Ecology, 26, 653–667.Google Scholar

Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Duffy, A. M. Jr., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The challenge hypothesis: theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies of birds. American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (1993). The evolution of sexuality in chimpanzees and bonobos. Human Nature, 4, 47–79.Google Scholar

Wright, B. W., Wright, K. A., Chalk, J., Verderane, M. P., Fragaszy, D., Visalberghi, E., … & Vinyard, C. (2009). Fallback foraging as a way of life: Using dietary toughness to compare the fallback signal among capuchins and implications for interpreting morphological variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140, 687–699.Google Scholar

Zahavi, A. (1977). The testing of a bond. Animal Behaviour, 25, 246–247.Google Scholar

References

Ackermann, R. R. (2010). Phenotypic traits of primate hybrids: Recognizing admixture in the fossil record. Evolutionary Anthropology, 19, 258–270.Google Scholar

Adler, D. S., & Bar-Oz, G. (2009). Seasonal patterns of prey acquisition and inter-group competition during the Middle and Upper Palaeolithic of the Southern Caucasus. In Hublin, J.-J. & Richards, M. (Eds.), The evolution of hominin diets (pp. 127–140). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Aiello, L., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Neocortex size, group size, and the evolution of language. Current Anthropology, 34(2), 184–193.Google Scholar

Aiello, L. C., & Key, C. (2002). Energetic consequences of being a Homo erectus female. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 551–565.Google Scholar

Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Variation in testosterone levels and male reproductive effort: Insight from a polygynous human population. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 491–497.Google Scholar

Arsuaga, J. H., Carreteroc, J.-M., Lorenzod, C., Gómez-Olivenciaf, A., Pablosi, A., Rodríguez, L., … & Carbonell, E. (2015). Postcranial morphology of the middle Pleistocene humans from Sima de los Huesos, Spain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(37), 11524–11529.Google Scholar

Arsuaga, J. L., Villaverde, V., Quam, R., Martínez, I., Carretero, J. M., Lorenzo, C., & Gracia, A. (2007). New Neandertal remains from Cova Negra (Valencia, Spain). Journal of Human Evolution, 52(1), 31–58.Google Scholar

Atkinson, E. G., Audesse, A. J., Palacios, J. A., Bobo, D. M., Webb, A. E., Ramachandran, S., & Henn, B. M. (2018). No evidence for recent selection at FOXP2 among diverse human populations. Cell, 174, 1424–1435.Google Scholar

Austin, C., Smith, T. M., Bradman, A., Hinde, K., Joannes-Boyau, R., Bishop, D., … & Arora, M. (2013). Barium distributions in teeth reveal early-life dietary transitions in primates. Nature, 498, 216–219.Google Scholar

Balzeau, A., Turq, A., Talamo, S., Daujeard, C., Guérin, G., Welker, F., … & Gómez-Olivencia, A. (2020). Pluridisciplinary evidence for burial for the La Ferrassie 8 Neandertal child. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–10.Google Scholar

Bartsiokas, A., & Arsuaga, J.-L. 2020. Hibernation in hominins from Atapuerca, Spain half a million years ago. L’Anthropologie, 124(5), 102797.Google Scholar

Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Martinón-Torres, M., Martínez de Pinillos, M., García-Campos, C., Modesto-Mata, M., Martín-Francés, L., & Arsuaga, J. L. (2019). Metric and morphological comparison between the Arago (France) and Atapuerca-Sima de los Huesos (Spain) dental samples, and the origin of Neanderthals. Quaternary Science Reviews, 217, 45–61.Google Scholar

Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Martinón-Torres, M., Prado, L., Gómez-Robles, A., Rosell, J., López-Polín, L., … & Carbonell, E. (2010). New immature hominin fossil from European Lower Pleistocene shows the earliest evidence of a modern human dental development pattern. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(26), 11739–11744.Google Scholar

Binford, L. R. (2001). Constructing frames of reference: An analytical method for archaeological theory building using hunter-gatherer and environmental data sets. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Blasco, R. (2008). Human consumption of tortoises at Level IV of Bolomor Cave (Valencia, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 839–284.Google Scholar

Blasco, R., Finlayson, C., Rosell, J., Marco, A. S., Finlayson, S., Finlayson, G., … & Rodriguez, J. (2014). The earliest pigeon fanciers. Scientific Reports, 4, 5971.Google Scholar

Bocherens, H., Billiou, D., Mariotti, A., Toussaint, M., Patou-Mathis, M., Bonjean, D., & Otte, M. (2001). New isotopic evidence for dietary habits of Neandertals from Belgium. Journal of Human Evolution, 40, 497–505.Google Scholar

Bogin, B. (2003). The human pattern of growth and development in paleontological perspective. In Thompson, J. H., Krovitz, G. E., & Nelson, A. J. (Eds.), Patterns of growth and development in the genus Homo (pp. 15–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bourguignon, L., Sellami, F., Deloze, V., Sellier-Segard, N., Beyries, S., & Emery-Barbier, A. (2002). L’habitat moustérien de La Folie (Poitiers, Vienne): Synthèse des premiers résultats. Paléo, 14, 29–48.Google Scholar

Bribiescas, R. G. (2001). Reproductive ecology and life history of the human male. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 33, 148–176.Google Scholar

Bribiescas, R. G., Ellison, P. T., & Gray, P. B. (2012). Male life history, reproductive effort, and the evolution of the genus Homo. Current Anthropology, 53(6), S424–S435.Google Scholar

Brindle, M., & Opie, C. (2016). Postcopulatory sexual selection influences baculum evolution in primates and carnivores. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 283, 20161736.Google Scholar

Burkart, J. M., Hrdy, S., & Schaik, C. (2009). Cooperative breeding and human cognitive evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 175–186.Google Scholar

Busk, G. (1861). Translation with comments on the crania of the most ancient races of man by D. Schaaffhausen. Natural History Review, 1, 155–186.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating (Revised Edition). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Butovskaya, M. L., Lazebny, O. E., Vasilyev, V. A., Dronova, D. A., Karelin, D. V., Mabulla, A. Z. P., … & Ryskov, A. P. (2015). Androgen receptor gene polymorphism, aggression, and reproduction in Tanzanian foragers and pastoralists. PLOS ONE, 10(8), e0136208.Google Scholar

Cashdan, E. (2008). Waist to hip ratio across cultures: Trade offs between androgen and estrogen dependent traits. Current Anthropology, 49(6), 1099–1107.Google Scholar

Caspari, R., & Lee, S. H. (2006). Is human longevity a consequence of cultural change or modern biology? American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 129, 512–517.Google Scholar

Caspari, R., Rosenberg, K. R., & Wolpoff, M. H. (2017). Brother or other: The place of Neanderthals in human evolution. In Marom, A. and Hovers, E. (Eds.), Human paleontology and prehistory (pp. 253–271). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Chang, M. L., & Nowell, A. (2020). Conceiving of “Them” when before there was only “Us.” In Supernant, K., Baxter, J. E., Lyons, N., & Atalay, S. (Eds.), Archaeologies of the heart (pp. 205–223). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Chapais, B. (2013). Monogamy, strongly bonded groups, and the evolution of human social structure. Evolutionary Anthropology, 22, 52–65.Google Scholar

Charnov, E. L., & Berrigan, D. (1993). Why do female primates have such long lifespans and so few babies? Or life in the slow lane. Evolutionary Anthropology, 1, 191–194.Google Scholar

Chase, P. G., & Dibble, H. I. (1987). Middle Paleolithic symbolism: A review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 6(3), 263–296.Google Scholar

Churchill, S. (2014). Thin on the ground: Neandertal biology, archaeology, and ecology. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Churchill, S. E., & Rhodes, J. A. (2006). How strong were the Neandertals? Leverage and muscularity at the shoulder and elbow in Mousterian foragers. Periodicum Biologorum, 108(4), 457–470.Google Scholar

Collard, M., Tarle, L., Sandgathe, D., & Allan, A. (2016). Faunal evidence for a difference in clothing use between Neanderthals and early modern humans in Europe. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 44, 235–246.Google Scholar

Conde-Valverde, M., Martínez, I., Quam, R. M., Rosa, M., Velez, A. D., Lorenzo, C., … & Arsuaga, J. L. (2021). Neanderthals and Homo sapiens had similar auditory and speech capacities. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 5(5), 609–615.Google Scholar

Curnoe, D., & Thorne, A. (2003). Number of ancestral human species: A molecular perspective. HOMO – Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 53, 201–224.Google Scholar

Curra, J. O. (2020). The relativity of deviance, 5th ed. California: Sage Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar

Dannemann, M. (2020). The population-specific impact of Neandertal introgression on human disease. Genome Biology and Evolution. doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa250Google Scholar

Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Davies, R., & Underdown, S. (2006). The Neanderthals: A social synthesis. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16, 145–164.Google Scholar

DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. L., & Little, A. C. (2010). The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: Cross-cultural variation in women’s preferences for masculinized male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 277(1692), 2405–2410.Google Scholar

Dediu, D., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). Neanderthal language revisited: Not only us. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 49–55.Google Scholar

Degano, I., Soriano, S., Villa, P., Pollarolo, L., Lucejko, J. J., Jacobs, Z., … & Tozzi, C. (2019). Hafting of Middle Paleolithic tools in Latium (central Italy): New data from Fossellone and Sant’Agostino caves. PLOS ONE, 14, 1–29.Google Scholar

Degioanni, A., Bonenfant, C., Cabut, S., & Condemi, S. (2019). Living on the edge: Was demographic weakness the cause of Neanderthal demise? PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0216742.Google Scholar

Demuru, E., Ferrari, P. F., & Palagi, E. (2018). Is birth attendance a uniquely human feature? New evidence suggests that Bonobo females protect and support the parturient. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39, 502–510.Google Scholar

Dennell, R. W., Martinón-Torres, M., & Bermúdez de Castro, J. M. (2011). Hominin variability, climatic instability and population demography in Middle Pleistocene Europe. Quaternary Science Reviews, 30(11–12), 1511–1524.Google Scholar

DeSilva, J. M. (2011). A shift toward birthing relatively large infants early in human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA, 108(3), 1022–1027.Google Scholar

Devièse, T., Abrams, G., Hajdinjak, M., Pirson, S., De Groote, I., Di Modica, , K., … & Higham, , T. (2021). Reevaluating the timing of Neanderthal disappearance in Northwest Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 118(12), e2022466118.Google Scholar

Dixson, A. F. (2009). Sexual selection and the origins of human mating systems. Oxford: Oxford Biology.Google Scholar

Dunsworth, H., & Eccleston, L. (2015). The evolution of difficult childbirth and helpless hominin infants. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 55–69.Google Scholar

Dunsworth, H. M., Warrener, A. G., Deacon, T., Ellison, P. T., & Pontzer, H. (2012). Metabolic hypothesis for human altriciality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109(38), 15212–15216.Google Scholar

Ellison, P. T., Valeggia, C. R., & Sherry, D. S. (2005). Human birth seasonality. In Brockman, D. K. & van Schaik, C. P. (Eds.), Seasonality in primates: Studies of living and extinct human and non-human primates (pp. 379–399). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

El Zaatari, S., Grine, F. E., Ungar, P. S., & Hublin, J. J. (2016). Neandertal versus modern human dietary responses to climatic fluctuations. PLOS ONE, 11, e0153277.Google Scholar

Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.Google Scholar

Enard, D., & Petrov, D. A. (2018). Evidence that RNA viruses drove adaptive introgression between Neanderthals and modern humans. Cell, 175, 360–371.Google Scholar

Estalrrich, A., & Rosas, A. (2015). Division of labor by sex and age in Neandertals: An approach through the study of activity-related dental wear. Journal of Human Evolution, 80, 51–63.Google Scholar

Falk, D. (2004). Prelinguistic evolution in early hominins: Whence motherese? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(4), 491–503.Google Scholar

Fareed, M., & Afzal, M. (2017). Genetics of consanguinity and inbreeding in health and disease. Annals of Human Biology, 44(2), 99–107.Google Scholar

Finlayson, C., Brown, K., Blasco, R., Rosell, J., Negro, J. J., Bortolotti, G. R., … & Rodrígues Llanes, J. M. (2012). Birds of a feather: Neanderthal exploitation of raptors and corvids. PLOS ONE, 7(9), e45927.Google Scholar

Fitch, W. T. (2006). The biology and evolution of music: a comparative perspective. Cognition, 100(1), 173–215.Google Scholar

Froehle, A., Yokley, T. R., & Churchill, S. (2013). Energetics and the origin of modern humans. In Smith, F. H. & Ahern, J. C. M. (Eds.), The origins of modern humans: Biology reconsidered (pp. 285–320). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar

Fu, Q., Hajdinjak, M., Moldovan, O. T., Constantin, S., Mallick, S., Skoglund, P., … & Pääbo, S. (2015). An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor. Nature, 524, 216–219.Google Scholar

Fuhlrott, C. J. (1859). Menschliche Ueberreste aus einer Felsengrotte des Düsselthals. Ein Beitrag zur Frage über die Existenz fossiler Menschen. Verhandlungen des Nationales Verein des Preusisches Rheinlandisches und Westfalens, 16, 131–153.Google Scholar

Galway-Witham, J., Cole, J., & Stringer, C. (2019). Aspects of human physical and behavioural evolution during the last 1 million years. Journal of Quaternary Science, 34, 355–378.Google Scholar

García-Campos, C., Modesto-Mata, M., Martinón-Torres, M., Martínez de Pinillos, M., Martín-Francés, L., Arsuaga, J. L., & Bermúdez de Castro, J. M. (2020). Sexual dimorphism of the enamel and dentine dimensions of the permanent canines of the Middle Pleistocene hominins from Sima de los Huesos (Burgos, Spain). Journal of Human Evolution, 144, 102793.Google Scholar

García-Martínez, D., Bastir, M., Gómez-Olivencia, A., Maureille, B., Golovanova, L., Doronichev, V., … & Heuzé, Y. (2020). Early development of the Neanderthal ribcage reveals a different body shape at birth compared to modern humans. Science Advances, 6(41), eabb4377.Google Scholar

Garrigan, D., & Kingan, S. B. (2007). Archaic human admixture: A view from the genome. Current Anthropology, 48, 895–902.Google Scholar

Gómez-Olivencia, A., Barash, A., García-Martínez, D., Arlegi, M., Kramer, P., Bastir, M., & Been, E. (2018). 3D virtual reconstruction of the Kebara 2 Neandertal thorax. Nature Communications, 9, 4387.Google Scholar

Gómez-Robles, A. (2019). Dental evolutionary rates and its implications for the Neanderthal–modern human divergence. Science Advances, 5(5), eaaw1268.Google Scholar

Goodman, M., Griffin, P. B., Estioko-Griffin, A., & Grove, J. (1985). The compatibility of hunting and mothering among the Agta hunter-gatherers of the Philippines. Sex Roles, 12, 1199–1209.Google Scholar

Gray, P. B. (2013). Evolution and human sexuality. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 152(S57), 94–118.Google Scholar

Gray, P. B., Straftis, A. A., Bird, B. M., McHale, T. S., & Zilioli, S. (2019). Human reproductive behavior, life history, and the Challenge Hypothesis: A 30-year review, retrospective and future directions. Hormones and Behavior, 123, 104530.Google Scholar

Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M., … & Pääbo, S. (2010). A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science, 328, 710–722.Google Scholar

Grove, M., Pearce, E., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Fission-fusion and the evolution of hominin social systems. Journal of Human Evolution, 62, 191–200.Google Scholar

Guatelli‐Steinberg, D. (2009). Recent studies of dental development in Neandertals: Implications for Neandertal life histories. Evolutionary Anthropology, 18, 9–20.Google Scholar

Gunz, P., Neubauer, S., Maureille, B., & Hublin, J. J. (2010). Brain development after birth differs between Neanderthals and modern humans. Current Biology, 20(21), R921–R922.Google Scholar

Haas, R., Watson, J., Buonasera, T., Southon, J., Chen, J. C., Noe, S., … & Parker, G. (2020). Female hunters of the early Americas. Science Advances, 6(45), eabd0310.Google Scholar

Hagen, E. H., & Hammerstein, P. (2009). Did Neanderthals and other early humans sing? Seeking the biological roots of music in the territorial advertisements of primates, lions, hyenas, and wolves. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 291–320.Google Scholar

Haldane, J. B. S. (1922). Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. Journal of Genetics, 7, 101–109.Google Scholar

Hardy, K., Buckley, S., Collins, M. J., Estalrrich, A., Brothwell, D., Copeland, L., … & Rosas, A. (2012). Neanderthal medics? Evidence for food, cooking, and medicinal plants entrapped in dental calculus. Naturwissenschaften, 99, 617–626.Google Scholar

Hardy, B. L., Moncel, M. H., Kerfant, C., Lebon, M., Bellot-Gurlet, L., & Mélard, N. (2020). Direct evidence of Neanderthal fibre technology and its cognitive and behavioral implications. Scientific Reports, 10, 4889.Google Scholar

Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Psychological Review, 68, 155–186.Google Scholar

Harpending, H., & Bertam, J. (1975). Human population dynamics in archaeological time: Some simple models. Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology, 30, 82–91.Google Scholar

Harris, K., & Nielsen, R. (2016). The genetic cost of Neanderthal introgression. Genetics, 203, 881–891.Google Scholar

Harvati, K., & Harrison, T. (2008). Neanderthals revisited. In Harvati, K. & Harrison, T. (Eds.), Neanderthals revisited: New approaches and perspectives (pp. 1–7). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Harvey, P. H., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1985). Life history variation in primates. Evolution, 39, 559–581.Google Scholar

Hawkes, K. (2014). Primate sociality to human cooperation. Why us and not them? Human Nature, 25, 28–48.Google Scholar

Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J., & Blurton Jones, N. (1997). Hadza women’s time allocation, offspring provisioning, and the evolution of long postmenopausal life spans. Current Anthropology, 38(4), 551–577.Google Scholar

Hawkes, K., O’Connell, J. J., Blurton Jones, N. G., Alvarez, H., & Charnov, E. L. (1998). Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 1336–1339.Google Scholar

Hayden, B. (2012). Neanderthal social structure. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 31(1), 1–26.Google Scholar

Hey, J. (2009). The divergence of chimpanzee species and subspecies as revealed in multipopulation isolation-with-migration analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 27, 921–933.Google Scholar

Hewlett, B. S., & Winn, S. (2014). Allomaternal nursing in humans. Current Anthropology, 55(2), 200–229.Google Scholar

Higham, T., Douka, K., Wood, R., Ramsey, C. B., Brock, F., Basell, L., … & Jacobi, R. (2014). The timing and spatiotemporal patterning of Neanderthal disappearance. Nature, 512, 306–309.Google Scholar

Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2014). The meanings of chimpanzee gestures. Current Biology, 24(14), 1596–1600.Google Scholar

Hockett, B. (2012). The consequences of Middle Paleolithic diets on pregnant Neanderthal women. Quaternary International, 264, 78–82.Google Scholar

Hoffecker, J. F., & Cleghorn, N. (2000). Mousterian hunting patterns in the Northwestern Caucasus and the ecology of the Neanderthals. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 10, 368–378.Google Scholar

Hoffmann, D., Angelucci, D. E., Villaverde, V., Zapata, J., & Zilhão, J. (2018). Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neandertals 115,000 years ago. Science Advances, 2, eaar5255.Google Scholar

Holliday, T. W. (1997). Postcranial evidence of cold adaptation in European Neandertals. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 104, 245–258.Google Scholar

Holliday, T. W. (2008). Neanderthals and modern humans: An example of a mammalian syngameon? In Harvati, K. & Harrison, T. (Eds.), Neanderthals revisited: New approaches and perspectives (pp. 281–297). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, T., Nowell, A., & White, M. (2013). Life histories, metapopulation ecology, and innovation in the Acheulian. PaleoAnthropology, 2013, 61−76.Google Scholar

Houldcroft, C. J., & Underdown, S. J. (2016). Neanderthal genomics suggests a Pleistocene time frame for the first epidemiologic transition. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 160, 379–388.Google Scholar

Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hublin, J. J., Neubauer, S., & Gunz, P. (2015). Brain ontogeny and life history in Pleistocene hominins. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 370, 20140062.Google Scholar

Isler, K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2009). The expensive brain: A framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size. Journal of Human Evolution, 57(4), 392–400.Google Scholar

Isler, K., & van Schaik, C. P. (2012). How our ancestors broke through the gray ceiling: Comparative evidence for cooperative breeding in early Homo. Current Anthropology, 53, S453–S465.Google Scholar

Jackson, K. M., & Nazar, A. M. (2006). Breastfeeding, the immune response, and long-term health. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 106, 203–207.Google Scholar

Johansson, S. (2015). Language abilities in Neanderthals. Annual Review of Linguistics, 1, 311–332.Google Scholar

Kaplan, H., Hill, K., Lancaster, J., & Hurtado, A. M. (2000). A theory of human life history evolution: Diet, intelligence, and longevity. Evolutionary Anthropology, 9, 156–185.Google Scholar

Kennair, L. E. O., Grontvedt, M. B., & Amundsen, T. (2017). In Shackelford, T. K. & Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–13). Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. (2003). Palaeolithic grandmothers? Life history theory and early Homo. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9, 549–572.Google Scholar

Kennedy, G. E. (2005). From the ape’s dilemma to the weanling’s dilemma: Early weaning and its evolutionary context. Journal of Human Evolution, 48 (2), 123–145.Google Scholar

King, W. (1864). The reputed fossil man of the Neanderthal. Quarterly Journal of Science, 1, 88–97.Google Scholar

Koenig, A., & Borries, C. (2012). Hominoid dispersal patterns and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 21(3), 108–112.Google Scholar

Kolobova, K. A., Roberts, R. G., Chabai, B. B., Jacobs, Z., Krajcarz, M. T., Shalagina, A. V., … & Derevianko, A. P. (2020). Archaeological evidence for two separate dispersals of Neanderthals into southern Siberia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(6), 2879–2885.Google Scholar

Konner, M. (2010). The evolution of childhood: Relationships, emotion, mind. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar

Kramer, K. L. (2014). Why what juveniles do matters in the evolution of cooperative breeding. Human Nature, 25, 49–65.Google Scholar

Kramer, K. L., Schacht, R., & Bell, A. (2017). Adult sex ratios and partner scarcity among hunter–gatherers: Implications for dispersal patterns and the evolution of human sociality. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Series B, 372, 20160316.Google Scholar

Krause, J., Lalueza-Fox, C., Orlando, L., Enard, W., Green, R. E., Burbano, H. A., … & Pääbo, S. (2007). The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals. Current Biology, 17, 1908–1912.Google Scholar

Kubicka, A. M., Nowaczewska, W., Balzeau, A., & Piontek, J. (2018). Bilateral asymmetry of the humerus in Neandertals, Australian aborigines and medieval humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 167(1), 46–60.Google Scholar

Kuhlwilm, M., & Boeckx, C. (2019). A catalog of single nucleotide changes distinguishing modern humans from archaic hominins. Scientific Reports, 9, 8463.Google Scholar

Kuhlwilm, M., Gronau, I., Hubisz, M. J., De Filippo, C., Prado-Martinez, J., Kircher, M., … & Castellano, S. (2016). Ancient gene flow from early modern humans into Eastern Neanderthals. Nature, 530, 429–433.Google Scholar

Kuhn, S. L., & Stiner, M. C. (2006). What’s a mother to do? The division of labor among Neandertals and modern humans in Eurasia. Current Anthropology, 47, 953–980.Google Scholar

Kuzawa, C. W., & Bragg, J. M. (2012). Plasticity in human life history strategy implications for contemporary human variation and the evolution of genus Homo. Current Anthropology, 53(6), S369–S382.Google Scholar

Lalueza-Fox, C., Rosas, A., Estalrrich, A., Gigli, E., Campos, P. F., García-Tabernero, A., … & de la Rasilla, M. (2011). Genetic evidence for patrilocal mating behavior among Neandertal groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 250–253.Google Scholar

Launay, J., Tarr, B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Synchrony as an adaptive mechanism for large‐scale human social bonding. Ethology, 122, 779–789.Google Scholar

Lee, P. C. (2012). Growth and investment in hominin life history evolution: Patterns, processes, and outcomes. International Journal of Primatology, 6, 1309–1331.Google Scholar

Li, Y. P., Zhong, T., Huang, Z. P., Pan, R. L., Garber, P. A., Yu, F.-Q., & Xiao, W. (2020). Male and female birth attendance and assistance in a species of non-human primate (Rhinopithecus bieti). Behaviour Processes, 181, 104248.Google Scholar

Locke, J. L., & Bogin, B. (2006). Language and life history: A new perspective on the development and evolution of human language. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 29(3), 259–280.Google Scholar

Lonsdorf, E. V., Wilson, M. L., Boehm, E., Delaney-Soesman, J., Grebey, T., Murray, C., … & Pusey, A. E. (2020). Why chimpanzees carry dead infants: an empirical assessment of existing hypotheses. Royal Society Open Science, 7, 200931.Google Scholar

Low, B. S. (2006). Ecological and sociocultural influences on mating and marriage systems. In Dunbar, R. & Barrett, L. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Machado, J., Hernandez, C. M., Mallol, C., & Galvan, B. (2013). Lithic production, site formation and Middle Palaeolithic palimpsest analysis: In search of human occupation episodes at Abric del Pastor, Stratigraphic Unit IV (Alicante, Spain). Journal of Archaeological Science, 40, 2254–2273.Google Scholar

Maclarnon, A., & Hewitt, G. (2004). Increased breathing control: Another factor in the evolution of human language. Evolutionary Anthropology, 13, 181–197.Google Scholar

Maner, J. K., & Ackerman, J. M. (2020). Ecological sex ratios and human mating. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 24(2), 98–100.Google Scholar

Manning, J. T. (2002). Digit ratio: A pointer to fertility behavior and health. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. W. (2004). Mate preferences among Hadza hunter-gatherers. Human Nature, 15(4), 365–376.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. W. (2005). Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 54–67.Google Scholar

Marlowe, F. W., & Wetsman, A. (2000). Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and Individual Differences, 3, 481–489.Google Scholar

Marshall-Pescini, S., Cafazzo, S., Virányi, Z., & Range, F. (2017). Integrating social ecology in explanations of wolf–dog behavioral differences. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 16, 80–86.Google Scholar

Martin, R. D. (1996). Scaling of the mammalian brain: The maternal energy hypothesis. Physiology, 11(4), 149–156.Google Scholar

Martín-González, J. A., Mateos, A., Goikoetxea, I., Leonard, W. R., & Rodríguez, J. (2012). Differences between Neandertal and modern human infant and child growth models. Journal of Human Evolution, 63, 140–149.Google Scholar

Mateos, A., Goikoetxea, I., Leonard, W. R., Martín-González, J. Á., Rodríguez-Gómez, G., & Rodríguez, J. (2014). Neandertal growth: What are the costs? Journal of Human Evolution, 77, 167–178.Google Scholar

Mazza, P., Martini, F., Sala, B., Magi, M., Colombini, M. P., Giachi, G., … & Ribechini, E. (2006). A new Palaeolithic discovery: Tar-hafted stone tools in a European Mid-Pleistocene bone-bearing bed. Journal of Archaeological Science, 33, 1310–1318.Google Scholar

McGrath, K., Limmer, L. S., Lockey, A. L., Guatelli-Steinberg, D., Reid, D. J., Witzel, C., & El Zaatari, S. (2021). 3D enamel profilometry reveals faster growth but similar stress severity in Neanderthal versus Homo sapiens teeth. Scientific Reports, 11, 522.Google Scholar

McLean, C. V. Y., Reno, P. L., Pollen, A. A., Bassan, A. I., Capellini, T. D., Guenther, C., … & Kingsley, D. M. (2011). Human-specific loss of regulatory DNA and the evolution of human-specific traits. Nature, 471, 216–219.Google Scholar

Meyer, M., Arsuaga, J. L., De Filippo, C., Nagel, S., Aximu-Petri, A., Nickel, B., … & Pääbo, S. (2016). Nuclear DNA sequences from the Middle Pleistocene Sima de los Huesos hominins. Nature, 531, 504–507.Google Scholar

Miller, G. F. (1998). How mate choice shaped human nature: A review of sexual selection and human evolution. In Crawford, C. and Krebs, D. (Eds.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications (pp. 87–130). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Mithen, S. (2007). The singing Neanderthals. The origins of music, language, mind and body (pp. 374). London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.Google Scholar

Miyagawa, S., Lesure, C., & Nóbrega, V. A. (2018). Cross-modality information transfer: A hypothesis about the relationship among prehistoric cave paintings, symbolic thinking, and the emergence of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 20(9),115.Google Scholar

Mussi, M. (2007). Women of the middle latitudes: the earliest peopling of Europe from a female perspective. In Roebroeks, W. (Ed.), Guts and brains: An integrative approach to the hominin record (pp. 165–184). Leiden: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar

Nava, A., Lugli, F., Romandini, M., Badino, F., Evans, D., Helbling, A. H., … & Benazzi, S. (2020). Early life of Neanderthals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 117(46), 28719–28726.Google Scholar

Nelson, E., Rolian, C., Cashmore, L., & Shultz, S. (2011). Digit ratios predict polygyny in early apes, Ardipithecus, Neanderthals and early Modern Humans but not in Australopithecus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 1556–1563.Google Scholar

Niekus, M. J. L. T., Kozowyk, P. R. B., Langejans, G. H. J., Ngan-Tillard, D., van Keulen, H., van der Plicht, J., … & Dusseldorp, G. L. (2019). Middle Paleolithic complex technology and a Neandertal tar-backed tool from the Dutch North Sea. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 116(44), 22081–22087.Google Scholar

Nosil, P. (2012). Ecological speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nowell, A. (2013). Cognition, behavioral modernity and the archaeological record of the Middle and Early Upper Paleolithic. In Hatfield, G. and Pittman, H. (Eds.), The evolution of mind, brain, and culture (pp. 236–262). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Press.Google Scholar

Nowell, A. (2018). Paleolithic soundscapes and the emotional resonance of nighttime. In Gonlin, N. & Nowell, A. (Eds.), Archaeology of the night (pp. 27–44). Boulder, CO: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar

Nowell, A. (2021). Growing up in the Ice Age: Fossil and archaeological evidence of the lived lives of Plio-Pleistocene children. Oxford, Oxbow Books.Google Scholar

Nowell, A., & Kurki, H. (2020). Moving beyond the obstetrical dilemma hypothesis: Birth, weaning and infant care in the Plio-Pleistocene . In Gowland, R. & Halcrow, S. (Eds.), The mother–infant nexus in anthropology, bioarchaeology and social theory (pp. 173–190). Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar

Opie, C., Atkinson, Q. D., Dunbar, R. I., & Shultz, S. (2013). Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 110(33), 13328–13332.Google Scholar

Overmann, K. A., & Coolidge, F. L. (2013). Human species and mating systems: Neandertal-Homo sapiens reproductive isolation and the archaeological and fossil records. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 91, 91–110.Google Scholar

Palmquist, A. (2020). Cooperative lactation and the mother infant nexus. In Gowland, R. & Halcrow, S. (Eds.), The mother infant nexus in anthropology: Small beginnings, significant outcomes. (pp. 125–144). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar

Pearce, E., & Moutsiou, T. (2014). Using obsidian transfer distances to explore social network maintenance in late Pleistocene hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 36, 12–20.Google Scholar

Pearce, E., Stringer, C., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2013). New insights into differences in brain organization between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 280(1758), 20130168.Google Scholar

Pearce, E., Wlodarski, R., Machin, A., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2017). Variation in the β-endorphin, oxytocin, and dopamine receptor genes is associated with different dimensions of human sociality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 114(20), 5300–5305.Google Scholar

Peresani, M., Vanhaeren, M., Quaggiotto, E., Queffelec, A., & D’Errico, F. (2013). An ochered fossil marine shell from the Mousterian of Fumane Cave, Italy. PLOS ONE, 8, e68572.Google Scholar

Peretz, I. (2009). Music, language and modularity framed in action. Psychologica Belgica, 49(2–3), 157–175.Google Scholar

Petr, M., Hajdinjak, M., Fu, Q., Essel, E., Rougier, H., Crevecoeur, I., … & Kelso, J., (2020). The evolutionary history of Neanderthal and Denisovan Y chromosomes. Science, 369, 1653–1656.Google Scholar

Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). Sperm competition and the evolution of human sexuality. In Shackelford, T. K. & Hansen, R. D. (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality, evolutionary psychology (pp. 257–275). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar

Pimenoff, V. N., Mendes de Oliveira, C., & Bravo, I. G. (2016). Transmission between archaic and modern human ancestors during the evolution of the oncogenic human papillomavirus 16. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 34(1), 4–19.Google Scholar

Plavcan, M. J. (2012). Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male–male competition in primates. Where do humans fit in? Human Nature, 23, 45–67.Google Scholar

Plavcan, M. J., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997). Interpreting hominid behavior on the basis of sexual dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 345–374.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pomeroy, E., Bennett, P., Hunt, C., Reynolds, T., Farr, L., Frouin, M., … & Barker, G. (2020). New Neanderthal remains associated with the ‘flower burial’ at Shanidar Cave. Antiquity, 94(373), 11–26.Google Scholar

Ponce de León, M. S., Bienvenu, T., Akazawa, T., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (2016). Brain development is similar in Neanderthals and modern humans. Current Biology, 26, R665–R666.Google Scholar

Ponce de León, M. S., Golovanova, L., Doronichev, V., Romanova, G., Akazawa, T., Kondo, O., … & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (2008). Neanderthal brain size at birth provides insights into the evolution of human life history. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105(37), 13764–13768.Google Scholar

Portmann, A. (1990; 1969). A Zoologist Looks at Humankind. Translated, Schaefer, J.. New York: Columbia University Press (from German).Google Scholar

Power, C., Sommer, V., & Watts, I. (2013). The seasonality thermostat: Female reproductive synchrony and male behavior in monkeys, Neanderthals, and modern humans. PaleoAnthropology, 2013, 33–60.Google Scholar

Prüfer, K., de Filippo, C., Grote, S., Mafessoni, F., Korlević, P., Hajdinjak, M., … & Pääbo, S. (2017). A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia. Science, 358(6363), 655–658.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Prüfer, K., Racimo, F., Patterson, N., Jay, F., Sankararaman, S., Sawyer, S., … & Pääbo, S. (2014). The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains. Nature, 505, 43–49.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Puts, D. A. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 157–175.Google Scholar

Pussey, A. (2001). The genes of apes: Chimpanzee social organisation and reproduction. In de Waal, F. B. M (Ed.), The tree of origin: What primate behaviour can tell us about human social evolution (pp. 9–38). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Radovčić, D., Birarda, G., Vaccari, L., Sršen, A. O. Radovčić, J., & Frayer, D. W. (2020). Surface analysis of an eagle talon from Krapina. Nature: Scientific Reports, 10, 6329.Google Scholar

Ramirez Rozzi, F. V., & Bermúdez de Castro, J. M. (2004). Surprisingly rapid growth in Neanderthals. Nature, 428(6986), 936–939.Google Scholar

Refinetti, R. (2005). Time for sex: Nycthemeral distribution of human sexual behavior. Journal of Circadian Rhythms, 3(1), 4.Google Scholar

Richards, M. P., & Trinkaus, E. (2009). Out of Africa: Modern human origins special feature: isotopic evidence for the diets of European Neanderthals and early modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(38), 16034–16039.Google Scholar

Ríos, L., Kivell, T. L., Lalueza-Fox, C., Estalrrich, A., García-Tabernero, A., Huguet, R., … & Rosas, A. (2019). Skeletal anomalies in the Neandertal Family of El Sidrón (Spain) support a role of inbreeding in Neandertal extinction. Scientific Reports, 9, 1697.Google Scholar

Roebroeks, W., & Soressi, M. (2016). Neandertals revised. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 6372–6379.Google Scholar

Rogers, A. R., Harris, N. S., & Achenbach, A. A. (2020). Neanderthal-Denisovan ancestors interbred with a distantly related hominin. Science Advances, 6, eaay5483.Google Scholar

Roney, J. R., Hanson, K. N., Durante, K. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2006). Reading men’s faces: Women’s mate attractiveness judgments track men’s testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273(1598), 2169–2175.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Roney, J. R., Simmons, Z. L., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2010). Androgen receptor gene sequence and basal cortisol concentrations predict men’s hormonal responses to potential mates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277(1678), 57–63.Google Scholar

Rosas, A., Martínez-Maza, C., Bastir, M., García-Tabernero, A., Lalueza-Fox, C., Huguet, R., … & Fortea, J. (2006). Paleobiology and comparative morphology of a late Neandertal sample from El Sidrón, Asturias, Spain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 103(51), 19266–19271.Google Scholar

Rosas, A., Ríos, L., Estalrrich, A., Liversidge, H., García-Tabernero, A., Huguet, R., … & Dean, C. (2017). The growth pattern of Neandertals, reconstructed from a juvenile skeleton from El Sidrón (Spain). Science, 357(6357), 1282–1287.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, K., & Trevathan, W. (1995). Bipedalism and human birth: The obstetrical dilemma revisited. Evolutionary Anthropology, 4, 161–168.Google Scholar

Ruff, C. (2002). Variation in human body size and shape. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 211–232.Google Scholar

Ruff, C. (2010). Body size and body shape in early hominins – implications of the Gona pelvis. Journal of Human Evolution, 58(2), 166–178.Google Scholar

Săffa, G., Kubicka, A. M., Hromada, M., & Kramer, K. L. (2019). Is the timing of menarche correlated with mortality and fertility rates? PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0215462.Google Scholar

Sakamaki, T., Ryu, H., Toda, K., Tokuyama, N., & Furuichi, T. (2018). Increased frequency of intergroup encounters in wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) around the yearly peak in fruit abundance at Wamba. International Journal Primatolology, 39, 685–704.Google Scholar

Santi, D., Spaggiari, G., Granata, A. R. M., Setti, M., Tagliavini, S., Trenti, T., & Simoni, M. (2020). Seasonal changes of serum gonadotropins and testosterone in men revealed by a large data set of real-world observations over nine years. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 10, 914.Google Scholar

Schwartz, J. H., & Tattersall, I. (2010). Fossil evidence for the origin of Homo sapiens. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143(51), 94–121.Google Scholar

Sear, R., & Mace, R. (2008). Who keeps children alive? A review of the effects of kin on child survival. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 1–18.Google Scholar

Shea, J. (2008). Transitions or turnovers? Climatically-forced extinctions of Homo sapiens and Neanderthals in the east Mediterranean Levant. Quaternary Science Reviews, 27, 2253–2270.Google Scholar

Shirley, M. K., Cole, T. J., Arthurs, O. J., Clark, C. A., & Wells, J. (2020). Developmental origins of variability in pelvic dimensions: Evidence from nulliparous South Asian women in the United Kingdom. American Journal of Human, 32(2), e23340.Google Scholar

Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. (2007). The evolution of the social brain: Anthropoid primates contrast with other vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274, 2429–2436.Google Scholar

Shultz, S., Nelson, E., & Dunbar, R. I. (2012). Hominin cognitive evolution: Identifying patterns and processes in the fossil and archaeological record. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 367(1599), 2130–2140.Google Scholar

Silk, J. B., Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Crockford, C., Engh, A. L., Moscovice, L. R., … & Cheney, D. L. (2009). The benefits of social capital: Close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276(1670), 3099–3104.Google Scholar

Slon, V., Mafessoni, F., Vernot, B., Filippo, C., De Grote, S., Viola, B.,… & Pääbo, S. (2018). The genome of the offspring of a Neandertal mother and a Denisovan father. Nature, 561, 113–116.Google Scholar

Smith, B .H. (1991). Dental development and the evolution of life history in hominidae. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 86, 157–174.Google Scholar

Smith, T. M., Austin, C., Green, D. R., Joannes-Boyau, R., Bailey, S., Dumitriu, D., … & Arora, M. (2018). Wintertime stress, nursing, and lead exposure in Neanderthal children. Science Advances, 4(10), eaau9483.Google Scholar

Smith, T. M., Toussaint, M., Reid, D. J., Olejniczak, A. J., & Hublin, J.-J. (2007). Rapid dental development in a Middle Paleolithic Belgium Neanderthal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 104, 20220–20225.Google Scholar

Snodgrass, J. J., & Leonard, W. R. (2009). Neandertal energetics revisited: Insights into population dynamics and life history evolution. PaleoAnthropology, 2009, 220–237.Google Scholar

Soressi, M., McPherron, S. P., Lenoir, M., Dogandžić, T., Goldberg, P., Jacobs, Z., … & Texier, J.-P. (2013). Neandertals made the first specialized bone tools in Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110(35), 14186–14190.Google Scholar

Sparacello, V. S., Villotte, S., Shackelford, L. L., & Trinkaus, E. (2017). Patterns of humeral asymmetry among Late Pleistocene humans. Comptes Rendus – Palevol, 16(5–6), 680–689.Google Scholar

Spikins, P., Needham, A., Wright, B., Dytham, C., Gatta, M., & Hitchens, G. (2019). Living to fight another day: The ecological and evolutionary significance of Neanderthal healthcare. Quaternary Science Reviews, 217, 98–118.Google Scholar

Sterelny, K. (2007). Social intelligence, human intelligence and niche construction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, 362(1480), 719–730.Google Scholar

Stringer, C. B., Finlayson, J. C., Barton, R. N. E., Fernández-Jalvo, Y., Cáceres, I., Sabin, R. C., … & Riquelme-Cantal, J.-A. (2008). Neanderthal exploitation of marine mammals in Gibraltar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105(38), 14319–14324.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sullivan, A. P., de Manuel, M., Marques-Bonet, T., & Perry, G. H. (2017). An evolutionary medicine perspective on Neandertal extinction. Journal of Human Evolution, 108, 62–71.Google Scholar

Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2007). Perceptions of female body weight and shape among indigenous and urban Europeans. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(10), 43–50.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Theofanopoulou, C., Gastaldon, S., O’Rourke, T., Samuels, B. D., Martins, P. T., … & Boeckx, C. (2017). Self-domestication in Homo sapiens: Insights from comparative genomics. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0196700.Google Scholar

Thompson, J. L., & Nelson, A. J. (2011). Middle childhood and modern human origins. Human Nature, 22(3), 249–280.Google Scholar

Thomsen, R., & Sommer, V. (2017). Masturbation. In Fuentes, A. (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–2). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Thornton, A., McAuliffe, K., Dall, S. R., Fernandez-Duque, E., Garber, P. A., & Young, A. J. (2016). Fundamental problems with the cooperative breeding hypothesis. A reply to Burkart & van Schaik. Journal of Zoology, 299(2), 84–88.Google Scholar

Tokuyama, N., Toda, K., Poiret, M. L., Iyokango, B., Bakaa, B., & Ishizuka, S. (2021). Two wild female bonobos adopted infants from a different social group at Wamba. Nature: Scientific Reports 11, 4967.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M., & Gonzalez-Cabrera, I. (2017). The role of ontogeny in the evolution of human cooperation. Human Nature, 28, 274–288.Google Scholar

Tomasello, M., Melis, A. P., Tennie, C., Wyman, E., & Herrmann, E. (2012). Two key steps in the evolution of human cooperation. Current Anthropology, 53, 673–692.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trevathan, W. (2015). Primate pelvic anatomy and implications for birth. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 370, 20140065.Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E. (1980). Sexual differences in Neanderthal limb bones. Journal of Human Evolution, 9, 377–397.Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E. (1987). The Neandertal face: Evolutionary and functional perspectives on a recent hominid face. Journal of Human Evolution, 16, 429–443.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E. (1995). Neanderthal mortality patterns. Journal of Archaeological Science, 22, 121–142.Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E. (2011). Late Pleistocene adult mortality patterns and modern establishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 1267–1271.Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E. (2018). An abundance of developmental anomalies and abnormalities in Pleistocene people. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, 11941–11946.Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E., Moldovan, O., Milota, S., Bîlgăr, A., Sarcina, L., Athreya, S., … & van der Plicht, J. (2003). An early modern human from the Peştera cu Oase, Romania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 100(20), 11231–11236.Google Scholar

Trinkaus, E., & Villotte, S. (2017). External auditory exostoses and hearing loss in the Shanidar 1 Neandertal. PLOS ONE, 12(10), e0186684.Google Scholar

Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar

Vaesen, K., Dusseldorp, G. L., & Brandt, M. J. (2021). An emerging consensus in palaeoanthropology: Demography was the main factor responsible for the disappearance of Neanderthals. Scientific Reports, 11, 4925.Google Scholar

Vallverdú, J., Vaquero, M., Cáceres, I., Allué, E., Rosell, J., Saladié, P., … & Carbonell, E. (2010). Sleeping activity area within the site structure of archaic human groups: Evidence from Abric Romaní Level N combustion activity areas. Current Anthropology, 51(10), 137–145.Google Scholar

Vandermeersch, B., & Garralda, M. D. (2011). Neanderthal geographical and chronological variation. In Condemi, A. & Weniger, G. C. (Eds.), Continuity and discontinuity in the peopling of Europe (pp. 113–125). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

VanSickle, C., Cofran, Z., & Hunt, D. (2020). Did Neanderthals have large brains: Factors affecting endocranial volume comparisons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 173, 768–775.Google Scholar

Vigilant, L., & Langergraber, K. E. (2011). Inconclusive evidence for patrilocality in Neandertals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108(18), E87–E88.Google Scholar

Walker, R. S., Gurven, M., Burger, O., & Hamilton, M. J. (2008). The trade-off between number and size of offspring in humans and other primates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275(1636), 827–833.Google Scholar

Washburn, S. L. (1960). Tools and human evolution. Scientific American, 203, 63–75.Google Scholar

Weaver, T. D. (2009). Out of Africa: Modern human origins special feature: the meaning of Neandertal skeletal morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(38), 16028–16033.Google Scholar

Weaver, T. D., & Hublin, J.-J. (2009). Neandertal birth canal shape and the evolution of human childbirth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 8151–8156.Google Scholar

Wells, J. C. K. (2012). The capital economy in hominin evolution: How adipose tissue and social relationships confer phenotypic flexibility and resilience in stochastic environments. Current Anthropology, 53(6), S466–S478.Google Scholar

Weyrich, L. S., Duchene, S., Soubrier, J., Arriola, L., Llamas, B., Breen, J., … & Cooper, A. (2017). Neanderthal behaviour, diet, and disease inferred from ancient DNA in dental calculus. Nature, 544(7650), 357–361.Google Scholar

Whallon, R. (2006). Social networks and information: non-“utilitarian” mobility among hunter-gatherers. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 25(2), 259–270.CrossRef Google Scholar

White, S., Gowlett, J. A. J., & Grove, M. (2014). The place of the Neanderthals in hominin phylogeny. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 35, 32–50.Google Scholar

White, T. D., Lovejoy, C. O., Asfaw, B., Carlson, J. P., & Suwa, G. (2015). Neither chimpanzee nor human, Ardipithecus reveals the surprising ancestry of both. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 112(16), 4877–4884.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

White, M., Pettitt, P., & Schreve, D. (2016). Shoot first, ask questions later: Interpretative narratives of Neanderthal hunting. Quaternary Science Reviews, 140, 1–20.Google Scholar

Wilson, R. A. (2020). Rethinking incest avoidance: Beyond the disciplinary groove of culture-first views. Biological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752–019-00338-2 Google Scholar

Wilson, A. C., Maxson, L. R., & Sarich, V. M. (1974). Two types of molecular evolution. Evidence from studies of interspecific hybridization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 71, 2843–2847.Google Scholar

Wolff, H., & Greenwood, A. D. (2010). Did viral disease of humans wipe out the Neandertals? Medical Hypotheses, 75, 99–105.Google Scholar

Wragg Sykes, R. (2015). To see a world in a hafted tool: Birch pitch composite technology, cognition and memory in Neanderthals. In Coward, F., Hosfield, R., Pope, M., & Wenban-Smith, F. (Eds.), Settlement, society and cognition in human evolution: Landscapes in the mind (pp. 117–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wragg Sykes, R. (2020). Kindred: Neanderthal life, love, death and art. London: Bloomsbury Sigma.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female bonded primate groups. Behaviour, 75, 262–300.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R. W. (2019). Hypotheses for the evolution of reduced reactive aggression in the context of human self-domestication. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–11.Google Scholar

Wrangham, R., Jones, J. H., Layden, G., Pilbeam, D., & Conklin-Brittain, N. (1999). The raw and the stolen: Cooking and the ecology of human origins. Current Anthropology, 40, 567–594.Google Scholar

Zheng, Z., & Cohn, M. J. (2011). Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108(39), 16289–16294.Google Scholar

Ziegler, T. E., & Crockford, C. (2017). Neuroendocrine control in social relationships in non-human primates: Field based evidence. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 107–121.Google Scholar

Zinner, D., Arnold, M. L., & Roos, C. (2011). The strange blood: Natural hybridization in primates. Evolutionary Anthropology, 20, 96–103.Google Scholar

Zollikofer, C. P., & Ponce de León, M. S. (2010). The evolution of hominin ontogenies. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, 21(4), 441–452.Google Scholar

Book contents

Part III - Nonhuman Primate Sexual Behavior

Summary

Access options

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive