Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-dkqnh Total loading time: 2.296 Render date: 2021-10-21T03:30:40.860Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part V - Evolution and Cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2020

Lance Workman
Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Will Reader
Affiliation:
Sheffield Hallam University
Jerome H. Barkow
Affiliation:
Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J., eds. (1992). The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2017). From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York: William Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. (2005). So how does the mind work? Mind & Language, 20(1), 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20(3), 273281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and Natural Selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, M. J., Benke, G. P., Dimitriadis, C., et al. (2009). Mobile telephone use is associated with changes in cognitive function in young adolescents. Bioelectromagnetics, 30(8), 678686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ainsworth, M. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44(4), 709716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Society of Plastic Surgery. (2015). Plastic surgery procedural statistics. www.plasticsurgery.org/news/plastic-surgery-statistics.Google Scholar
Arnold, K., & Zuberbühler, K. (2006). The alarm-calling system of adult male putty-nosed monkeys, Cercopithecus nictitans martini. Animal Behaviour, 72(3), 643653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., et al. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21(3), 372374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. A. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 573590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bivin, J. B., Mathew, P., Thulasi, P. C., & Philip, J. (2013). Nomophobia – Do we really need to worry about? Reviews of Progress, 1, 15.Google Scholar
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bruni, O., Sette, S., Fontanesi, L., et al. (2015). Technology use and sleep quality in preadolescence and adolescence. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 11(12), 14331441.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byun, Y., Ha, M., Kwon, H., et al. (2013). Mobile phone use, blood lead levels, and attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms in children: A longitudinal study. PLoS ONE, 8(3), e59742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Feldman, M. W. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Monographs in Population Biology, 16, 1388.Google ScholarPubMed
Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (1990). How Monkeys See the World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chielens, K., & Heylighen, F. (2005). Operationalization of meme selection criteria: Methodologies to empirically test memetic predictions. In Proceedings of the Joint Symposium on Socially Inspired Computing (AISB’05). Hove: Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour, pp. 1420.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, R. B., Leshner, G., & Almond, A. (2015). The extended iSelf: The impact of iPhone separation on cognition, emotion, and physiology. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(2), 119135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csányi, V. (2000). The “human behavior complex” and the compulsion of communication: Key factors of human evolution. Semiotica, 128(3–4), 243258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. N., Butler, B., & Kraut, R. (2002). The quality of online social relationships. Communications of the ACM, 45(7), 103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
David, P., Bjorksten, T., Fowler, K., & Pomiankowski, A. (2000). Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature, 406(6792), 186188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
David-Barrett, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2016). Language as a coordination tool evolves slowly. Royal Society Open Science, 3(12), 160259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation. In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds., Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 282309.Google Scholar
Derks, D., Bos, A. E. R., & Grumbkow, J. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 842849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixson, B. J., Dixson, A. F., Li, B., & Anderson, M. J. (2007). Studies of human physique and sexual attractiveness: Sexual preferences of men and women in China. American Journal of Human Biology, 19, 8895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Gossip, Grooming and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2008). Cognitive constraints on the structure and dynamics of social networks. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12(1), 716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Social cognition on the Internet: Testing constraints on social network size. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 367(1599), 21922201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ezoe, S., & Toda, M. (2013). Relationships of loneliness and mobile phone dependence with Internet addiction in Japanese medical students. Open Journal of Preventive Medicine, 3(6), 407412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, J., Dai, W., Liu, F., & Wu, J. (2005). Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272(1560), 219226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fink, B., Weege, B., Manning, J. T., & Trivers, R. (2014). Body symmetry and physical strength in human males. American Journal of Human Biology, 26(5), 697700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992). Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. American Naturalist, 139(3), 603622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 731746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frein, S. T., Jones, S. L., & Gerow, J. E. (2013). Computers in human behavior when it comes to Facebook there may be more to bad memory than just multitasking. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 21792182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getty, T. (2006). Sexually selected signals are not similar to sports handicaps. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(2), 8388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Go, A. S., Mozaffarian, D., Roger, V. L., et al. (2013). Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2013 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 127(1), e6e245.Google ScholarPubMed
Grafen, A. (1990). Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 144(4), 517546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haufe, C. (2007). Sexual selection and mate choice in evolutionary psychology. Biology & Philosophy, 23(1), 115128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, L. M. (1987). Receptive competencies of language-trained animals. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 17, 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, G., Bellugi, U., & Klima, E. S. (1996). The neurobiology of sign language and its implications for the neural basis of language. Nature, 381(6584), 699702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, G. E., & Montgomerie, R. (1994). Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 258(1351), 4752.Google Scholar
Johnston, V. S., & Franklin, M. (1993). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethology and Sociobiology, 14(3), 183199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kautiainen, S., Koivusilta, L., Lintonen, T., Virtanen, S. M., & Rimpelä, A. (2005). Use of information and communication technology and prevalence of overweight and obesity among adolescents. International Journal of Obesity, 29(8), 925933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, A. L. S., Valença, A. M., Silva, A. C. O., et al. (2013). Nomophobia: Dependency on virtual environments or social phobia? Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 140144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 12371245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemmer, E. T., & Snyder, F. W. (1972). Measurement of time spent communicating. Journal of Communication, 22(2), 142158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konok, V., Pogány, Á., & Miklósi, Á. (2017). Mobile attachment: Separation from the mobile induces physiological and behavioural stress and attentional bias to separation-related stimuli. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 228239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, S., Zebrowitz, L. A., San Giovanni, J. P., & Sherak, B. (1995). Infant preferences for attractiveness and babyfaceness. In Bardy, B. G., Bootsma, R. J., & Guillard, Y., eds., Studies in Perception and Action III. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 389392.Google Scholar
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., et al. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 10171031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction – A review of the psychological literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(12), 35283552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Evolution, 78(6), 37213725.Google ScholarPubMed
Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., et al. (2000). Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(3), 390423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavie, C. J., Milani, R. V, & Ventura, H. O. (2009). Obesity and cardiovascular disease: Risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 53(21), 19251932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2014). The relationship between cell phone use, academic performance, anxiety, and Satisfaction with Life in college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 343350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitas, D. (2013). Always Connected: How Smartphones And Social Keep Us Engaged. Framingham, MA: International Data Corporation (IDC).Google Scholar
Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L., & Marlowe, F. W. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: Data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter–gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1629), 31133117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). The many faces of research on face perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 16341637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lui, K. F. H., & Wong, A. C.-N. (2012). Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(4), 647653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycett, J. E., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2000). Mobile phones as lekking devices among human males. Human Nature, 11(1), 93104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyn, H. (2012). Apes and the Evolution of Language: Taking Stock of 40 Years of Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyon, B. E., & Montgomerie, R. (2012). Sexual selection is a form of social selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 367(1600), 22662273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyon, B. E., Eadie, J. M., & Hamilton, L. D. (1994). Parental choice selects for ornamental plumage in American coot chicks. Nature, 371, 240243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self-presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 446458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maples, W. C., DeRosier, W., Hoenes, R., Bendure, R., & Moore, S. (2008). The effects of cell phone use on peripheral vision. Optometry – Journal of the American Optometric Association, 79(1), 3642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mason, N. A., Shultz, A. J., & Burns, K. J. (2014). Elaborate visual and acoustic signals evolve independently in a large, phenotypically diverse radiation of songbirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788), 20140967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, R. K., Reither, E. N., Powers, D. A., et al. (2013). The impact of obesity on US mortality levels: The importance of age and cohort factors in population estimates. American Journal of Public Health, 103(10), 18951901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mennella, J. A. (2014). Ontogeny of taste preferences: Basic biology and implications for health. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 99(3), 704S711S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesch, G. S. (2006). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. Journal of Family Communication, 6(2), 119138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minear, M., Brasher, F., Mccurdy, M., Lewis, J., & Younggren, A. (2013). Working memory, fluid intelligence, and impulsiveness in heavy media multitaskers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(6), 12741281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, A. P. (1992). Female swallow preference for symmetrical male sexual ornaments. Nature, 357(6375), 238240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D., & Wolf, J. B. (1997). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51(5), 13521362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamaru, M., & Dieckmann, U. (2009). Runaway selection for cooperation and strict-and-severe punishment. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 257(1), 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasar, J., Hecht, P., & Wener, R. (2008). Mobile telephones, distracted attention, and pedestrian safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(1), 6975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasar, J. L., & Troyer, D. (2013). Pedestrian injuries due to mobile phone use in public places. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 57, 9195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nie, N. H., & Hillygus, D. S. (2002). The impact of Internet use on sociability: Time-diary findings. IT & Society, 1(1), 120.Google Scholar
Noë, R., & Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: Supply and demand determine the effect and mating mutualism of partner choice in cooperation. Behavioral Ecology, 35(1), 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ophir, E., Nass, C., & Wagner, A. D. (2009). Cognitive control in media multitaskers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(37), 1558315587.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pachucki, M. A., Jacques, P. F., & Christakis, N. A. (2011). Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 21702177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennay, D. (2006). ATSB Research and Analysis Report. Road Safety Consultant Report CR 229, Community Attitudes to Road Safety – Wave 19. Canberra: Australian Transport Safety Bureau.Google Scholar
Penton-Voak, I. S., & Chen, J. Y. (2004). High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(4), 229241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepperberg, I. M. (2010). Functional vocalizations by an African grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus). Zeitschrift Für Tierpsychologie, 55(2), 139160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrett, D. I., May, K. A., & Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368(6468), 239242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrin, A. (2015). Social Media Usage: 2005–2015 (October), 2005–2015. Pew Research Center. October 2015. www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015.Google Scholar
Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86(2), 184195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollet, T. V., Roberts, S. G. B., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). Use of social network sites and instant messaging does not lead to increased offline social network size, or to emotionally closer relationships with offline network members. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 253258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pongrácz, P., Molnár, C., Miklósi, A., & Csányi, V. (2005). Human listeners are able to classify dog (Canis familiaris) barks recorded in different situations. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 119(2), 136144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Progovac, L. (2016). A gradualist scenario for language evolution: Precise linguistic reconstruction of early human (and Neandertal) grammars. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1714.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryke, S. R., Andersson, S., & Lawes, M. J. (2001). Sexual selection of multiple handicaps in the red-collared widowbird: Female choice of tail length but not carotenoid display. Evolution, 55(7), 14521463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., Dehaan, C. R., & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 18411848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redelmeier, D. A., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1997). Association between cellular-telephone calls and motor vehicle collisions. New England Journal of Medicine, 336(7), 453458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, G., Zebrowitz, L. A., Clark, A., et al. (2001). Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 3146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rideout, V., & Saphir, M. (2012). Social Media, Social Life: How Teens View Their Digital Lives. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. G. B., Dunbar, R. I. M., Pollet, T. V., & Kuppens, T. (2009). Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks, 31, 138146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, L. D., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2013). Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 948958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, L. D., Lim, A. F., Carrier, L. M., & Cheever, N. A. (2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Psicología Educativa 17, 163177.Google Scholar
Rosser, S. V. (1992). Biology and Feminism. A Dynamic Interaction. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Schassburger, R. M. (1993). Vocal Communication in the Timber Wolf, Canis lupus, Linnaeus: Structure, Motivation, and Ontogeny. Berlin: Paul Parey Scientific Publishers.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, H., Edelman, A., Falkenstern, M., & Stewart, C. (2010). The associations among computer-mediated communication, relationships, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 299306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scissors, L., Burke, M., & Wengrovitz, S. (2016). What’s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook. Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing – CSCW, 16, 14991508.Google Scholar
Searcy, W. A., & Nowicki, S. (2005). The Evolution of Animal Communication: Reliability and Deception in Signaling Systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, N., Sharma, P., Sharma, N., & Wavare, R. (2015). Rising concern of nomophobia amongst Indian medical students. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3(3), 705707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1994). A critical review of philosophical work on the units of selection problem. Philosophy of Science, 61(4), 534555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stald, G. (2008). Mobile identity: Youth, identity, and mobile communication media. In Buckingham, D., ed., Youth, Identity, and Digital Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 143164.Google Scholar
Strano, M. (2008). User descriptions and interpretations of self-presentation through Facebook profile images. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 2(2), 113.Google Scholar
Számadó, S., & Szathmáry, E. (2006). Selective scenarios for the emergence of natural language. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(10), 555561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornhill, R., & Møller, A. P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 72(4), 497548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzell, T., & Pilbeam, D. (1971). Phyletic divergence dates of hominoid primates: A comparison of fossil and molecular data. Evolution, 25(4), 615635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Eijnden, R. J., Meerkerk, G.-J., Vermulst, A. A., Spijkerman, R., & Engels, R. C. (2008). Online communication, compulsive internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 655665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhulst, S., Dieleman, S. J., & Parmentier, H. K. (1999). A tradeoff between immunocompetence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(8), 44784481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vodafone (2013). Digital lives: How do teenagers in the UK navigate their digital world? www.vodafone.com/content/dam/vodafone/parents/assets_2013/pdf/digital_lives_report.pdf.Google Scholar
Wellman, B., Haase, A. Q., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital?: Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 436455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West-Eberhard, M. J. (1979). Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 123(4), 222234.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, G. S., Presgraves, D. C., & Crymes, L. (1998). Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature, 391(6664), 276279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. S., & Sober, E. (1994). Reintroducing group selection to the human behavioral sciences. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 585608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D., & Moore, A. J. (1999). Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. American Naturalist, 153(3), 254266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, B., & Harrison, T. (2011). The evolutionary context of the first hominins. Nature, 470(7334), 347352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection – A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zephoria (2015). The Top 20 Valuable Facebook Statistics – Updated October 2015. https://zephoria.com/top-15-valuable-facebook-statistics.Google Scholar
Zheng, F., Gao, P., He, M., et al. (2014). Association between mobile phone use and inattention in 7102 Chinese adolescents: A population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14, 1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuberbühler, K. (2012). Communication in nonhuman primates. In Vonk, J. & Shakelford, T. K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 320338.Google Scholar
Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, Sex and Status: Biological Approaches to Mind and Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mindreading system. In Ellis, B. J. & Bjorklund, D. F., eds., Origins of the Social Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and Child Development. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 468492.Google Scholar
Bering, J. M., & Povinelli, D. J. (2003). Comparing cognitive development. In Maestripieri, D., ed., Primate Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 205233.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 187192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, M., Fritz, A., & Hala, S. (1989). Small-scale deceit: Deception as a marker of two-, three-, and four-year-olds’ early theories of mind. Child Development, 60, 12631277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, R., & Krebs, J. R. (1978). Animal signals: Information or manipulation? In Krebs, J. R. & Davies, N. B., eds., Behavioral Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publishers, pp. 282309.Google Scholar
Debey, E., De Schryver, M., Logan, G. D., Suchotzki, K., & Verschuere, B. (2015). From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception. Acta Psychologica, 160, 5868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the Face. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Evans, A. D., & Lee, K. (2013). Emergence of lying in very young children. Developmental Psychology, 49(10), 19581963.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. S., Jenkins, L., & Popoola, O. (1979). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freire, A., Eskritt, M., & Lee, K. (2004). Are eyes windows to a deceiver’s soul? Children’s use of another’s eye gaze cues in a deceptive situation. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 10931104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosselin, P., Warren, M., & Diotte, M. (2002). Motivation to hide emotion and children’s understanding of the distinction between real and apparent emotions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 163(4), 479495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffith, S. B., trans. (1963). The Art of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hala, S., Chandler, M., & Fritz, A. S. (1991). Fledgling theories of mind: Deception as a marker of three-year-olds’ understanding of false belief. Child Development, 62(1), 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, N. (1976). The social function of intellect. In Bateson, P. P. G. & Hinde, R. A., eds., Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 303317.Google Scholar
Josephs, I. E. (1993). The Regulation of Emotional Expression in Preschool Children. Münster, NY: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Josephs, I. E. (1994). Display rule behavior and understanding in preschool children. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(4), 301326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J. (1988a). L’evolution at la function de la tromperie. Anthropologie et Societes, 12(3), 6375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J. (1988b). The ontogeny of tactical deception in humans. In Byrne, R. & Whiten, A., eds., Evolution of Social Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 238252.Google Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J. (1998). Card sharks and poker faces: Links between developmental research on deception and evolutionary models. Presented at the International Society for Human Ethology, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
LaFreniere, P. J., & Ménard, J. M. (1990). Le développement de la tromperie tactique chez le jeune enfant. Enfance, 45(4), 361373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M., Stanger, C., & Sullivan, M. W. (1989). Deception in 3-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 439443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockard, J. S., & Paulhus, D. S. (1988). Self-Deception: An Adaptive Mechanism. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. W. (1986). A framework for discussing deception. In Mitchell, R. W. & Thompson, N. S., eds., Deception: Perspectives on Human and Nonhuman Deceit. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, pp. 340.Google Scholar
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen Eighty-Four. London: Martin Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Owings, D. H., & Morton, E. S. (1998). Animal Vocal Communication: A New Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D. J., & O’Neill, D. K. (2000). Do chimpanzees use their gestures to instruct each other? In Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J., eds., Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 459487.Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1988). “Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind” revisited. In Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A., eds., Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 160179.Google Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 515526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, V. (2007). Getting back to the rough ground: Deception and ‘social living’. In Emery, N., Nicola, C., & Frith, C., eds., Social Intelligence: From Brain to Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 219244.Google Scholar
Ruihe, H., & Guoliang, Y. (2006). Children’s understanding of emotional display rules and use of strategies. Psychological Science (China), 29(1), 1821.Google Scholar
Saarni, C. (1984). An observational study of children’s attempts to monitor their expressive behavior. Child Development, 55(4), 15041513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, T. R., & Cloghesy, K. (1981). Development of recursive awareness of intention. Developmental Psychology, 17(4), 465471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R., & LaFreniere, P. (2013). Development of tactical deception from 4 to 8 years of age. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 3041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sodian, B., & Schneider, W. (1990). Children’s understanding of cognitive cuing: How to manipulate cues to fool a competitor. Child Development, 61(3), 697704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sodian, B., Taylor, C., Harris, P. L., & Perner, J. (1991). Early deception and the child’s theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62(3), 468483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talwar, V., & Crossman, A. (2011). From little white lies to filthy liars: The evolution of honesty and deception in young children. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 40, 139179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talwar, V., & Lee, K. (2008). Social and cognitive correlates of children’s lying behavior. Child Development, 79, 866881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Talwar, V., Gordon, H. M., & Lee, K. (2007). Lying in the elementary school years: Verbal deception and its relation to second-order belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 804810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Ethology, 20(4), 410433.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (1976). Forward. In Dawkins, R., ed., The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. (2000). The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 907, 114131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. (2012). The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 1656.Google ScholarPubMed
Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodruff, G., & Premack, D. (1979). Intentional communication in the chimpanzee: The development of deception. Cognition, 7(4), 333362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007). Remembering the past and imagining the future: Common and distinct neural substrates during event construction and elaboration. Neuropsychologia, 45, 13631377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbib, M. A. (2005). From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 105168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbib, M. A. (2012). How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blasi, D. E., Wichmann, S., Hammarström, H., Stadler, P. F., & Christiansen, M. H. (2016). Sound–meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 1080810823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, R. L. (2010). The role of the hippocampus in prediction and imagination. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 2748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burling, R. (1999). Motivation, conventionalization, and arbitrariness in the origin of language. In King, B. J., ed., The Origins of Language: What Human Primates can Tell Us. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, pp. 307350.Google Scholar
Call, J., & Michael Tomasello, M. (2008). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Science, 12, 187192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2007). Biolinguistic explorations: design, development, evolution. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 15, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2010). Some simple evo devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Larson, R. K., Déprez, V., & Yamakido, H., eds., The Evolution of Human Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, N. S., Bussey, T. J., & Dickinson, A. (2003). Can animals recall the past and plan for the future? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 685691.Google ScholarPubMed
Corballis, M. C. (2002). From Hand to Mouth: The Origins of Language. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Corballis, M. C. (2004). The origins of modernity: Was autonomous speech the critical factor? Psychological Review, 111, 543552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corballis, M. C. (2013). Mental time travel: A case for evolutionary continuity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1859). On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the Modern Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dor, D. (2015). The Instruction of Imagination: Language as a Social Communication Technology. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K. (2002). Language, Cognition, and Brain: Insights from Sign Language Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Evans, N. (2009). Dying Words. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N., & Levinson, S. C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 429492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everett, D. L. (2005). Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology, 46, 621646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, D. J., & Wilson, M. A. (2006). Reverse replay of behavioural sequences in hippocampal place cells during the awake state. Nature, 440, 680683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujita, K. (2009). A prospect for evolutionary adequacy: Merge and the evolution and development of human language. Biolinguistics, 3, 128153.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. A. & Gardner, B. T. (1969). Teaching sign language to a chimpanzee. Science, 165, 664672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Widening the lens: what the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Ways of Words. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. S., van der Meer, M. A. A., Touretzky, D. S., & Redish, A. D. (2010). Hippocampal replay is not a simple function of experience. Neuron, 65, 695705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hewes, G. W. (1973). Primate communication and the gestural origins of language. Current Anthropology, 14, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobaiter, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2011). Serial gesturing by wild chimpanzees: Its nature and function for communication. Animal Cognition, 14, 827838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockett, C. F. (1960). The origins of speech. Scientific American, 203, 8896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffecker, J. F. (2005). Innovation and technological knowledge in the Upper Paleolithic. Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, 186198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, W. D., Taglialatela, J. P., & Leavens, D. A. (2007). Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Animal Behaviour, 73, 281286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janmaat, K. R. L., Polansky, L., Ban, S. D., & Boesch, C. (2014). Wild chimpanzees plan their breakfast time, type, and location. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 1634316348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaminski, J., Call, J., & Fischer, J. (2004). Word learning in a domestic dog: Evidence for “fast mapping”. Science, 304, 16821683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, F. (2007). Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43, 365392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. G. (2008). Out of Africa and the evolution of human behavior. Evolutionary Anthropology, 17, 267281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knott, A. (2012). Sensorimotor Cognition and Natural Language Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krupenye, C., Fumihiro, K., Hirata, S., & Call, J. (2016). At apes anticipate that other individual will act according to false beliefs. Science, 354, 110116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 958.Google Scholar
Martin, V. C. Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C., & Addis, D. R. (2011). A role for the hippocampus in encoding simulations of future events. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 1385813863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBrearty, S., & Brooks, A. S. (2000). The revolution that wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 453563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellars, P. A. (2009). Origins of the female image. Nature, 459, 176177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moser, M. B., Rowland, D. C., & Moser, E. I. (2015). Place cells, grid cells, and memory. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7, a021808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, I. (1675). Letter from Sir Isaac Newton to Robert Hooke. Historical Society of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, August 7, 2016. https://discover.hsp.org/Record/dc-9792/Description#tabnav.Google Scholar
Niles, J. D. (2010). Homo narrans: The Poetics and Anthropology of Oral Literature. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, J., & Nadel, N. (1978). The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, F. G. P., & Gordon, W. (2001). Twenty-seven years of project Koko and Michael. In Galdikas, B. M. F., Briggs, N. E., Sheeran, L. K., & Goodall, J., eds., All Apes Great and Small, Vol. 1: African Apes. New York: Kluver, pp. 165176.Google Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 31, 108178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pepperberg, I. M. (1999). The Alex Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, B. E., & Foster, D. J. (2013). Hippocampal place-cell sequences depict future paths to remembered goals. Nature, 497, 7479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfenning, A. R., Hara, E., Whitney, O., et al. (2014). Convergent specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds. Science, 346, 13331346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pietrandrea, P. (2002). Iconicity and arbitrariness in Italian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies, 2, 296321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilley, J. W., & Reid, A. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86, 184195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 13, 707784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 4, 515526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaele, P. (2006). Speaking bonobo. Smithsonian Magazine. www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/speaking-bonobo-134931541.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia – A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 334.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Arbib, M. A. (1998). Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21, 188194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 264274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosati, A. G., & Santos, L. R. (2016). Spontaneous metacognition in rhesus monkeys. Psychological Science, 27, 11811191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sassoon, S. (1920). Limitations. In Sassoon, S, ed., Picture-Show. New York: E.P. Dutton.Google Scholar
Savage-Rumbaugh, S., Shanker, S. G., & Taylor, T. J. (1998). Apes, Language, and the Human Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott-Phillips, T. (2015). Speaking Our Minds: Why Human Communication Is Different, and How Language Evolved to Make It Special. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1960). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In Gumperz, J & Levinson, S. C., eds., Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7096.Google Scholar
Slocombe, K. E., & Zuberbühler, K. (2007). Chimpanzees modify recruitment screams as a function of audience composition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 1722817233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (2002). Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind and Language, 17, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studdert-Kennedy, M. (2005). How did language go discrete? In Tallerman, M., ed., Language Origins: Perspectives on Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 4867.Google Scholar
Suddendorf, T. (2013). Mental time travel: Continuities and discontinuities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 151152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (1997). Mental time travel and the evolution of the human mind. Genetic, Social, & General Psychology Monographs, 123, 133167.Google ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 30, 299351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2010). Behavioural evidence for mental time travel in nonhuman animals. Behavioural Brain Research, 215, 292298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tattersall, I. (2012). Masters of the Planet: The Search for Human Origins. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). The Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2009). Universal grammar is dead. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 470471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, P., & Roebroeks, W. (2014). Neandertal demise: An archaeological analysis of the modern human superiority complex. PLoS ONE, 9, e96424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alphen, J. J. M., Bernstein, C., & Driessen, G. (2003). Information acquisition and time allocation in insect parasitoids. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18, 8187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C. (2018). The varieties of foraging experience. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 135138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W. J. (1991). Searching Behaviour: The Behavioural Ecology of Finding Resources. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Binford, L. (1990). Mobility, housing, and environment: A comparative study. Journal of Anthropological Research, 46, 119152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, T. C., Wilke, A., & Hayden, B. Y. (2014). Hot hand bias in rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 280286.Google ScholarPubMed
Castel, A. D., Drolet Rossi, A., & McGillivray, S. (2012). Beliefs about the “hot hand” in basketball across adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 27, 601605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charnov, E. L. (1976). Optimal foraging: The marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology, 9, 129136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croson, R., & Sundali, J. (2005). The gambler’s fallacy and the hot hand: Empirical data from Casinos. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 30, 195209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czienskowski, U. (2005a). The Fishing Task Experiment [computer software]. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar
Czienskowski, U. (2005b). The Word Puzzle Experiment [computer software]. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.Google Scholar
Falk, R. (1975). Perception of randomness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (in Hebrew, with English abstract), Hebrew University of Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Falk, R., & Konold, C. (1997). Making sense of randomness: Implicit encoding as a basis for judgment. Psychological Review, 104, 301318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, T. W., Fallenstein, B., Higginson, A. D., et al. (2014). The evolution of decision rules in complex environments. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 153161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985). The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive psychology, 17, 295314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haselton, M. G., Bryant, G. A., Wilke, A., et al. (2009). Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Social Cognition, 27, 733763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, K., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hills, T. T., Todd, P. M., & Jones, M. N. (2015). Foraging in semantic fields: How we search through memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 7, 513534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodgins, D. C., Stea, J. N., & Grant, J. E. (2011). Gambling disorders. Lancet, 378, 18741884.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, J. M. C., & Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioral biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes, 69, 97124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchinson, J. M. C., Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2008). Patch leaving in humans: Can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches? Animal Behaviour, 75, 13311349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwasa, Y., Higashi, M., & Yamamura, N. (1981). Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. American Naturalist, 117, 710723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, R. L. (1995). The Foraging Spectrum. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Krause, J., & Ruxton, G. D. (2002). Living in Groups: Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R., Ryan, J. C., & Charnov, E. L. (1974). Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study of patch use by chickadees. Animal Behavior, 22, 953964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legge, E. L. G., Spetch, M. L., Cenker, A., et al. (2012). Not all locations are created equal: Exploring how adults hide and search for objects. PLOS ONE, 7, e36993.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livoreil, B., & Giraldeau, L.-A. (1997). Patch departure decisions by spice finches foraging singly or in groups. Animal Behavior, 54, 967977.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Cognitive aging and adaptive foraging behavior. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 64, 474481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mata, R., Wilke, A., & Czienskowski, U. (2013). Foraging across the life span: Is there a reduction in exploration with aging? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, J. M. (1982). Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theoretical Population Biology, 21, 269288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (1985). Optimal foraging and learning. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 117, 231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickerson, R. S. (2002). The production and perception of randomness. Psychological Review, 109, 330357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1993). A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. Nature, 364, 5658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oskarsson, A. T., van Boven, L., McClelland, G. H., & Hastie, R. (2009). What’s next? Judging sequences of binary events? Psychological Bulletin, 135, 262285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pirolli, P. (2007). Information Foraging Theory: Adaptive Interaction with Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raab, M., Gula, B., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). The hot hand exists in volleyball and is used for allocation decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 8194.Google ScholarPubMed
Reifman, A. (2011). Hot Hand: The Statistics behind Sports’ Greatest Streaks. Dulles, VA: Potomac Books.Google Scholar
Scheibehenne, B., Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2011). Expectations of clumpy resources influence predictions of sequential events. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 326333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, H. J., Hall, M. N., & Bilt, J. V. (1997). Estimating the Prevalence of Disordered Gambling Behavior in the United States and Canada: A Meta-analysis. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
Talbot, K. J., Legge, E. L. G., Bulkito, V., & Spetch, M. L. (2009). Hiding and searching strategies of adult humans in a virtual and a real-space room. Learning and Motivation, 40, 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. (1961). Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, 189, 732735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R., Woiwod, I. P., & Perry, J. N. (1978). The density-dependence of spatial behaviour and the rarity of randomness. Journal of Animal Ecology, 47, 383406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, P. M., & Gigerenzer, G. (2012). What is ecological rationality? In Todd, P. M., Gigerenzer, G., & The ABC Research Group, eds., Ecological Rationality: Intelligence in the World. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, P. M., Hills, T. T., & Robbins, T. W., eds. (2012). Cognitive Search: Evolution, Algorithms, and the Brain (Strüngmann Forum Reports, Vol. 9). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J., & DeVore, I. (1987). The reconstruction of hominid behavioral evolution through strategic modeling. In Kinsey, W. G., ed., The Evolution of Primate Behavior: Primate Models. New York: State University of New York Press, pp. 183237.Google Scholar
Waage, J. K. (1979). Foraging for patchily-distributed hosts by parasitoid, Nemeritis canescens. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 353371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnberg, E., Fauvegue, X., & Pons, O. (2000). Patch leaving decision rules and the marginal value theorem: An experimental analysis and a simulation model. Behavioral Ecology, 11, 577586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wajnberg, E., Gonsard, P.-A., Tabone, E., et al. (2003). A comparative analysis of patch-leaving decision rules in a parasitoid family. Journal of Animal Ecology, 72, 618626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, A. (2006). Evolved responses to an uncertain world. Unpublished PhD thesis, Free University of Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilke, A., & Barrett, H. C. (2009). The hot hand phenomenon as a cognitive adaptation to clumped resources. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 161169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, A., & Mata, R. (2012). Cognitive bias. In Ramachandran, V. S., ed., Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd ed. Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Wilke, A., & Todd, P. M. (2010). Past and present environments: The evolution of decision making. Psicothema, 22, 48.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilke, A., Hutchinson, J. M. C., Todd, P. M., & Czienskowski, U. (2009). Fishing for the right words: Decision rules for human foraging behavior in internal search tasks. Cognitive Science, 33, 497529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilke, A., Scheibehenne, B., Gaissmaier, W., McCanney, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2014). Illusionary pattern detection in habitual gamblers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35, 291297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilke, A., Minich, S., Panis, M., et al. (2015). A game of hide and seek: Expectations of clumpy resources influence hiding and searching patterns. PLoS ONE, 10, e0130976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilke, A., Lydick, J., Bedell, V., et al. (2018). Spatial dependency in local resource distributions. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 12, 163172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterhalder, B., & Smith, E. A. (1981). Hunter–Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Archaeological Analyses. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1992). ICD-10 Classifications of Mental and Behavioural Disorder: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar