Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Economic and Monetary Union
- Part II The Monetary Dimension
- Part III The Economic and Fiscal Dimensions
- 15 Reviving the Case for Policy Coordination in EMU
- 16 Ten Years of the European Semester
- 17 The EU Fiscal Rules
- 18 National Fiscal Policy in EMU
- 19 The Politics of Fiscal Integration in Eurozone Reforms and Next Generation EU
- 20 Adjustments in Economic Crises
- 21 Designing a Permanent EU-Wide Stabilization Facility
- 22 Enhancing Private and Public Risk Sharing
- Part IV Financial Integration
- Index
- References
20 - Adjustments in Economic Crises
The Different Outcomes of the Sovereign Debt and Pandemic Crises in Europe
from Part III - The Economic and Fiscal Dimensions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- The Cambridge Handbook of European Monetary, Economic and Financial Integration
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Part I The Economic and Monetary Union
- Part II The Monetary Dimension
- Part III The Economic and Fiscal Dimensions
- 15 Reviving the Case for Policy Coordination in EMU
- 16 Ten Years of the European Semester
- 17 The EU Fiscal Rules
- 18 National Fiscal Policy in EMU
- 19 The Politics of Fiscal Integration in Eurozone Reforms and Next Generation EU
- 20 Adjustments in Economic Crises
- 21 Designing a Permanent EU-Wide Stabilization Facility
- 22 Enhancing Private and Public Risk Sharing
- Part IV Financial Integration
- Index
- References
Summary
The European Union has introduced two different financial institutions for helping Member States to adjust to two crises with similar systemic implications. The European Stability Mechanism (ESM) for adjusting to the sovereign debt crisis of the early 2010s and the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) for recovering from the pandemic crisis’s economic consequences of early 2020s. In less than a decade, in facing two crises with similar economic implications, the EU moved from an approach of ‘unconstrained intergovernmentalism’ (ESM) to an approach of ‘constrained supranationalism’ (RRF), although the ESM is a permanent institution while RRF is a pro tempore one (lasting until December 2026). In moving from one to the other approach, policy learning is considered to have been a crucial factor. While the European Central Bank has been instrumental in managing both crises, the chapter’s focus is on post-crisis economic (and not monetary) adjustment. It thus examines the role of national governments and supranational actors in the establishment and governance of different financial instruments for helping Member States to recover from economic crises.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Batora, J. (2020). Interstitial organisations and segmented integration in EU Governance. In Bátora, J. and Fossum, J. E. (eds.), Towards a Segmented European Political Order: The European Union’s Post-Crises Conundrum. London: Routledge, pp. 152–174.Google Scholar
Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D., and Puetter, U. (eds.) (2015). The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Borzel, T. A. (2016). From EU governance of crisis to crisis of EU governance: Regulatory failure, redistributive conflict and Eurosceptic public. Journal of Common Market Studies 54, 8–31.Google Scholar
Buti, M. (2020). A tale of two crises: Lessons from the financial crisis to prevent the Great Fragmentation. VoxEU, July.Google Scholar
Buti, M., and Gaspar, V. (2021). Maastricht values. VoxEU, July. https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/maastricht-valuesGoogle Scholar
Buti, M., and Fabbrini, S. (2023). Next Generation EU and the future of economic governance: Towards a paradigm change or just a big one off? Journal of European Public Policy 30(4), 676–695.Google Scholar
Council of the EU (2020). Next multiannual financial framework and recovery package: Council presidency reaches political agreement with the European Parliament. Brussels, 10 November. www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2020/11/10/next-multiannual-financial-framework-and-recovery-package-council-presidency-reaches-political-agreement-with-the-european-parliament/Google Scholar
Crespy, A., and Schramm, L. (2021). Breaking the budgetary taboo: German preference formation in the EU’s response to Covid-19. Paper presented at the Governance and Politics Programme seminar series, EUI, 13 January.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draghi, M. (2012). Speech at the Global Investment Conference in London, 26 July. www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dehousse, R. (ed.) (2011). The ‘Community Method’: Obstinate or Obsolete? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dunlop, C. A., and Radaelli, C. M. (2016). Policy learning in the eurozone crisis: Modes, power and functionality. Policy Sciences 49, 107–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, M. (2020). The internal market: Increasingly differentiated? In Coman, R., Crespy, A. and Schmidt, V. A. (eds.), Governance and Politics in the Post-Crisis European Union, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elysee (2020). French-German Initiative for the European Recovery from the Coronavirus Crisis. www.elysee.fr/en/emmanuel-macron/2020/05/18/french-german-initiative-for-the-european-recovery-from-the-coronavirus-crisisGoogle Scholar
Enderlein, H., and Verdun, A. (eds.) (2013). EMU and Political Science: What Have We Learned? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
ESM Treaty (2012). Available at www.esm.europa.eu/sites/default/files/20150203_-_esm_treaty_-_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission (2020). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Recovery and Resilience Facility. Brussels, 28 May. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0408Google Scholar
European Council (2020). Conclusions. Brussels, 17–21 July. www.consilium.europa.eu/media/45109/210720-euco-final-conclusions-en.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Parliament (2020). European Parliament resolution of 23 July 2020 on the conclusions of the extraordinary European Council meeting of 17–21 July 2020. Brussels, 23 July. www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-07-23_EN.htmlGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, F. (2016). Economic Governance in Europe: Comparative Paradoxes and Constitutional Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2015). Which European Union? Europe after the Euro Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2020). Institutions and decision-making in the EU. In Coman, R., Crespy, A., and Schmidt, V. (eds.), Governance and Politics in the Post-Crisis European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 54–73.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, F. (2022). The EU Fiscal Capacity: Legal Integration After Covid-19 and the War in Ukraine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S. (2023). Going beyond the pandemic: Next Generation EU and the politics of sub-regional coalitions. Comparative European Politics 21(1), 64–81.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, S., and Puetter, U. (2016). Integration without supranationalisation: The central role of the European Council in post-Lisbon EU politics. Journal of European Integration 38(5), 481–495.Google Scholar
Farrell, H., and Heritier, A. (2007). Contested competences in Europe: Incomplete contracts and interstitial institutional change. West European Politics 30(2), 227–243.Google Scholar
Ferrera, M., Mirò, J., and Ronchi, S. (2021). Walking the road together? EU polity maintenance during the COVID-19 crisis. West European Politics 44(5–6), 1329–1352.Google Scholar
Fleming, S. (2020). Is the Franco-German recovery plan a game-changer? Financial Times, 19 May.Google Scholar
Fossum, J. E. (2020). Politics versus law: The European Council and balancing European Union style. Unpublished EU-3D paper.Google Scholar
Genschel, P., and Jachtenfuchs, M. (eds.) (2014). Beyond the Regulatory Polity: The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hallerberg, M. (2014). Why is there fiscal capacity but little regulation in the US, but regulation and little fiscal capacity in Europe? The Global Financial Crisis as a test case. In Genschel, P. and Jachtenfuchs, M. (eds.), Beyond the Regulatory Polity: The European Integration of Core State Powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Heldt, C. E., and Mueller, T. (2019). The (self-)empowerment of the European Central Bank during the sovereign debt crisis. Journal of European Integration 43(1), 83–98.Google Scholar
Heritier, A. (2007). Explaining Institutional Change in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, D., and Quaglia, L. (2016). The Political Economy of European Banking Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Howarth, D., and Spendzharova, A. (2019). Accountability in post-crisis eurozone governance: The tricky case of the European Stability Mechanism. Journal of Common Market Studies 57(4), 894–911.Google Scholar
Jacoby, W., and Hopkin, J. (2020). From lever to club? Conditionality in the European Union during the financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 27(8), 1157–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E. (2020a). The politics of Economic and Monetary Union. In Amtenbrink, F. and Hermann, C. (eds.), The EU Law of Economics and Monetary Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 523–596.Google Scholar
Jones, E. (2020b). COVID-19 and the EU economy: Try again, fail better. Survival, 62(4), 81-100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D., and Meunier, S. (2016). Failing forward? The euro crisis and the incomplete nature of European integration. Comparative Political Studies 49(7), 1010–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladi, S., and Tsarouhas, D. (2020). EU economic governance and Covid-19: Policy learning and windows of opportunity. Journal of European Integration 42(8), 1041–1056.Google Scholar
Letter of the nine (2020). Available at www.governo.it/sites/new.governo.it/files/letter_michel_20200325_eng.pdfGoogle Scholar
Matthijs, M. (2020). Lessons and learnings from a decade of EU crises. Journal of European Public Policy 27(8), 1127–1136.Google Scholar
Matthijs, M., and Blyth, M. (eds.) (2015). The Future of the Euro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthijs, M., Parsons, C., and Toenshoff, C. (2019). Ever tighter union? Brexit, Grexit, and frustrated differentiation in the single market and eurozone. Comparative European Politics 17(2), 209–230.Google Scholar
Morelli, P., and Seghezza, E. (2021). Why was the ECB’s reaction to Covid-19 crisis faster than after the 2008 financial crash? Journal of Policy Modeling 43(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Puetter, U. (2006). The Eurogroup: How a Secretive Circle of Finance Ministers Shape European Economic Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Puetter, U. (2014). The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quaglia, L., and Verdun, A. (2021). Explaining the response of the ECB to the Covid-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning. Paper delivered at the Conference on ‘The Covid-19 Pandemic and the European Union’, EUI, Florence, 9–10 December.Google Scholar
Richardson, J., and Mazey, S. (2015). European Union: Power and Policy-Making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
RRF Regulation (2021). Available at https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/PE-75-2020-INIT/en/pdfGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, V. A. (2019). Europe’s Crisis of Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Truchlewski, Z., Schelkle, W., and Ganderson, J. (2021). Buying time for democracies? European Union emergency politics in the time of COVID-19. West European Politics 44(5–6), 1353–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K., and Tuori, K. (2014). The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Middelaar, L. (2019). Alarums and Excursion: Improvising Politics on the European Stage. English Translation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Agenda Publishing.Google Scholar
Verdun, A. (2015). A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy 22(2), 219–237.Google Scholar
Verdun, A. (2017). Political leadership of the European Central Bank. Journal of European Integration 39(2), 207–221.Google Scholar
Verdun, A., and Zimmermann, H. (2006). EMU Rules: The Political and Econimic Consequences of European Monetary Integration. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Wallace, H. (2000). The institutional setting: Five variations on a theme. In Wallace, H. and Wallace, W. (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by