Adelstein, J. S., Shehzad, Z., Mennes, M., DeYoung, C. G., Zuo, X. N., Kelly, C., et al. (2011). Personality is reflected in the brain’s intrinsic functional architecture. PloS ONE, 6(11), e27633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: a psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), 171–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alpaugh, P. K., Parham, I. A., Cole, K. D., & Birren, J. E. (1982). Creativity in adulthood and old age: an exploratory study. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 8(2), 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences USA, 1316(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baer, J. (2010). Is Creativity Domain Specific? In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (p. 321). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., & Gray, J. A. (1988a). Differential performance of acute and chronic schizophrenics in a latent inhibition task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176(10), 598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baruch, I., Hemsley, D. R., & Gray, J. A. (1988b). Latent inhibition and “psychotic proneness” in normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 9(4), 777–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: a critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(4), 355–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (in press a). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.Google Scholar

Beaty, R. E., Kaufman, S. B., Benedek, M., Jung, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., et al. (in press b). Personality and complex brain networks: the role of openness to experience in default network efficiency. Human Brain Mapping.Google Scholar

Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Sommer, M., Arendasy, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: the common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benedek, M., Mühlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences USA, 1124 (1), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, S. H. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: a shared vulnerability model. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(3), 144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased creative achievement in high-functioning individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, L., Connelly, B. S., & Geeza, A. A. (2012). Separating method factors and higher order traits of the Big Five: a meta-analytic multitrait–multimethod approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Chermahini, S. A., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b) link between creativity and dopamine: spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coan, R. W. (1972). Measurable components of openness to experience. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39(2), 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Davies, S. E., & Birkland, A. (2014). Opening up openness: a theoretical sort following critical incidents methodology and a meta-analytic investigation of the trait family measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Conner, T. S., Silvia, P. J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Creative days: a daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

De Manzano, O., Cervenka, S., Karabanov, A., Farde, L., & Ullen, F. (2010). Thinking outside a less intact box: thalamic dopamine D2 receptor densities are negatively related to psychometric creativity in healthy individuals. PLoS ONE, 5(5), e10670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Depue, R. A., Luciana, M., Arbisi, P., Collins, P., & Leon, A. (1994). Dopamine and the structure of personality: relation of agonist-induced dopamine activity to positive emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2013). The neuromodulator of exploration: a unifying theory of the role of dopamine in personality. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic big five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness/Intellect: A Dimension of Personality Reflecting Cognitive Exploration. In Cooper, M. L. & Larsen, R. J. (eds.), APA Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology: Personality Processes and Individual Differences (Vol. 4, pp. 369–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Grazioplene, R. G., & Peterson, J. B. (2012). From madness to genius: the openness/intellect trait domain as a paradoxical simplex. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Sources of openness/intellect: cognitive and neuropsychological correlates of the fifth factors of personality. Journal of Personality, 73(4), 825–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

DeYoung, C. G., Shamosh, N. A., Green, A. E., Braver, T. S., & Gray, J. R. (2009). Intellect as distinct from openness: differences revealed by fMRI of working memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 883–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Dollinger, S. J., Urban, K. K., & James, T. A. (2004). Creativity and openness: further validation of two creative product measures. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 62–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44(3), 329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, E. T. (1966). Measurement of openness to experience: a study of regression in the service of the ego. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(6), 655–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2014). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(2), 87–108.Google Scholar

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A Broad-Bandwidth, Public Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Several Five-Factor Models. In Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., & Ostendorf, F. (eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Grazioplene, R. G., Chavez, R. S., Rustichini, A., & DeYoung, C. G. (2016). Personality, psychosis, and connectivity: white matter correlates of psychosis-linked traits support continuity between personality and psychopathology. Submitted.Google Scholar

Greenberg, D. M., Müllensiefen, D., Lamb, M. E., & Rentfrow, P. J. (2015). Personality predicts musical sophistication. Journal of Research in Personality, 58, 154–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jang, K. L., Hu, S., Livesley, W. J., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., et al. (2002). Genetic and environmental influences on the covariance of facets defining the domains of the five-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences: a latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

John, O.P. (1990). The “Big Five” Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires. In Pervin, L. A. (ed.), Handbook of Personality, Theory and Research (pp. 66–100). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm Shift to the Integrative Big Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Conceptual Issue. In John, O. P., Robins, R. W., & Pervin, L. A. (eds), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 114– 58). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Johnson, J. A. (1994). Clarification of factor five with the help of the AB5C model. European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 311–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, J. A., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). Clarification of the five-factor model with the Abridged Big Five Dimensional Circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jung, R. E., Grazioplene, R., Caprihan, A., Chavez, R. S., & Haier, R. J. (2010). White matter integrity, creativity, and psychopathology: disentangling constructs with diffusion tensor imaging. PloS ONE, 5(3), e9818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2015). The Big Five, the Huge Two, and creative self-beliefs: a meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative – but not in mathematics!: self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Waterstreet, M. A., Ailabouni, H. S., Whitcomb, H. J., Roe, A. K., et al. (2010). Personality and self-perceptions of creativity across domains. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2011). Intelligence and the Cognitive Unconscious. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, S. B. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence (pp. 442–67). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2013). Opening up openness to experience: a four-factor model and relations to creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 233–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jimenez, L., Brown, J. B., et al. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., et al. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality.Google Scholar

King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozbelt, A., Kaufman, S. B., Walder, D. J., Ospina, L. H., & Kim, J. (2014). The Evolutionary Genetics of the Creativity-Psychosis Connection. In Kaufman, J. C. (ed.), Creativity and Mental Illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kühn, S., Ritter, S. M., Müller, B. C., Baaren, R. B., Brass, M., et al. (2014). The importance of the default mode network in creativity – a structural MRI study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 48(2), 152–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kyaga, S., Landén, M., Boman, M., Hultman, C. M., Långström, N., et al. (2013). Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-year prospective total population study. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 47(1), 83–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(2), 329–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lubow, R. E. (1989). Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory (Vol. 9). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubow, R. E., Ingberg-Sachs, Y., Zalstein-Orda, N., & Gewirtz, J. C. (1992). Latent inhibition in low and high “psychotic-prone” normal subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(5), 563–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (1987). Creativity, divergent thinking, and openness to experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1258–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Navas-Sánchez, F. J., Alemán-Gómez, Y., Sánchez-Gonzalez, J., Guzmán-De-Villoria, J. A., Franco, C., et al. (2014). White matter microstructure correlates of mathematical giftedness and intelligence quotient. Human Brain Mapping, 35(6), 2619–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nettle, D. (2006). Schizotypy and mental health amongst poets, visual artists, and mathematicians. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 876–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nelson, B., & Rawlings, D. (2010). Relating schizotypy and personality to the phenomenology of creativity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 36(2), 388–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oleynick, V. C., Thrash, T. M., LeFew, M. C., Moldovan, E. G., & Kieffaber, P. D. (2014). The scientific study of inspiration in the creative process: challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Passamonti, L., Terracciano, A., Riccelli, R., Donzuso, G., Cerasa, A., et al. (2015). Increased functional connectivity within mesocortical networks in open people. Neuroimage, 104, 301–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Peabody, D., & Goldberg, L. R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality-trait descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Penke, L., Maniega, S. M., Bastin, M. E., Valdés Hernández, M. C., Murray, C., et al. (2012). Brain white matter tract integrity as a neural foundation for general intelligence. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(10), 1026–30.Google ScholarPubMed

Perrine, N. E., & Brodersen, R. (2005). Artistic and scientific creative behavior: openness and the mediating role of interests. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(4), 217–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1137–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of Creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 48–73). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poe, E. A. (1899). The Mystery of Marie Roget. New York: R. F. Fenno.Google Scholar

Reber, A. S., Walkenfeld, F. F., & Hernstadt, R. (1991). Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 888–96.Google ScholarPubMed

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1986). Exceptional giftedness in early adolescence and intrafamilial divergent thinking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 15(4), 335–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saucier, G. (1992). Openness versus intellect: much ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 6(5), 381–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (1994). Trapnell versus the lexical factor: more ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 8(4), 291–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Saucier, G. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. Journal of Personality, 77(5), 1577–1614.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999). Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: a cross-language replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Silvia, P. J., Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., Eddington, K. M., Levin-Aspenson, H., et al. (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: a review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Barona, C. M., Cram, J. T., et al. (2008). Assessing creativity with divergent thinking tasks: exploring the reliability and validity of new subjective scoring methods. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 68–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. (2009). The common neural basis of autobiographical memory, prospection, navigation, theory of mind, and the default mode: a quantitative meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Takeuchi, H., Taki, Y., Hashizume, H., Sassa, Y., Nagase, T., et al. (2012). The association between resting functional connectivity and creativity. Cerebral Cortex, 22(12), 2921–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tellegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83(3), 268–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thrash, T. M., & Elliot, A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 84(4), 871.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., Cassidy, S. E., Fryer, J. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Mediating between the muse and the masses: inspiration and the actualization of creative ideas. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 98(3), 469.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings (ASD-TR-61–97). Lackland Air Force Base, TX: Aeronautical Systems Division, Personnel Laboratory (reprinted in 1992, Journal of Personality, 60, 225–51).Google Scholar

Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15(4), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Woo, S. E., Chernyshenko, O. S., Longley, A., Zhang, Z. X., Chiu, C. Y., et al. (2014). Openness to experience: its lower level structure, measurement, and cross-cultural equivalence. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(1), 29–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., et al. (2011). The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106(3), 1125–65.Google ScholarPubMed

Zacks, R. T., Hasher, L., & Sanft, H. (1982). Automatic encoding of event frequency: further findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8(2), 106.Google Scholar

Zillig, L. M. P., Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (2002). What do we assess when we assess a Big 5 trait? A content analysis of the affective, behavioral, and cognitive processes represented in Big 5 personality inventories. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 847–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar