Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-n9lxd Total loading time: 1.258 Render date: 2022-09-30T20:41:00.152Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

22 - Optimal Local Government and Public Service Provision

from Part III - Community Psychology in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2021

Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Affiliation:
Long Island University, New York
Get access

Summary

The optimal size of government for the provision of public services is a question almost as old as the institution of government itself. One answer to the question is that government needs to be big enough to ensure that it can be both autonomous and self-sufficient. Another answer is that government needs to be large enough to capture efficiencies in service production. Neither answer is wholly satisfactory, in large part because they fail to specify how the common good is to be balanced against the need to preserve human dignity. In this chapter I first review the problems with extant arguments relating to the optimal size of government for public service provision before turning to a potential resolution to the problem which puts the person at the center of the quest for optimal local government. I then examine the most commonly executed reforms employed to alter the size of local governments before considering some public policy alternatives that might be more in keeping with an attempt to balance the common good against human dignity.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Community Psychology
Interdisciplinary and Contextual Perspectives
, pp. 451 - 467
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, R., & Boyne, G. (2009). Size structure and administrative overheads: An empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46(4), 739759. doi.org/10.1177%2F0042098009102127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle. (1992). The politics. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2018). National regional profile. Canberra, Australia: ABS. http://stat.abs.gov.au/itt/r.jsp?databyregion#/Google Scholar
Baird, M. (2015). Fit for the future: $2 billion community windfall by merging unfit councils [Press Release]. www.olg.nsw.gov.au/news/ministerial-media-release-fit-future-2-billion-community-windfall-merging-unfit-councilsGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. (2000). The limits of liberty: Between anarchy and Leviathan. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Craig, H. (2018, March 9). Tamworth’s Viaduct Park to be home to new $1.7m skatepark. The Northern Daily Leader. www.northerndailyleader.com.au/story/5274373/skate-city-17m-new-skatepark-near-tamworth-cbd-video/Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1967). The city in the future of democracy. American Political Science Review, 61(4), 953970. doi.org/10.2307/1953398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. (1990). After the revolution? London, UK: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, J. (2018). How losers can turn into winners in disputatious public policy: A heuristic for prospective herestheticians. Australian Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 116. doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2018.1520195Google Scholar
Drew, J., & Dollery, B. (2014). Separation anxiety: An empirical evaluation of the Sunshine Coast regional council de-amalgamation. Public Money & Management, 34(3), 213220. doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.908032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, J., & Dollery, B. (2015). Breaking up is hard to do: The de-amalgamation of Delatite Shire. Public Finance and Management, 15(1), 123.Google Scholar
Drew, J., Dollery, B., & Kortt, M. (2014). Can’t get no satisfaction. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 75(1), 6577. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, J., & Grant, B. (2017). Subsidiarity: More than a principle of decentralisation – a view from local government. Publius, 47(4), 522545. doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, J., Grant, B., & Fisher, J. (2017). Re-evaluating local government amalgamations: Utility maximisation meets the principle of double effect. Policy & Politics, 45(3), 379394. doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14539914690045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, J., McQuestin, D., & Dollery, B. (2018a). Good to share? The pecuniary implications of moving to shared service production for local government services. Public Administration, 97(1), 115. doi.org/ 10.1111/padm.12575Google Scholar
Drew, J., Razin, E., & Andrews, R. (2018b). Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: A comparative analysis. Local Government Studies, 45(5), 120. doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2018.1530657Google Scholar
Emon, Q., Levering, M., & Novak, D. (2014). Natural law: A Jewish, Christian and Islamic trialogue. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, G., Drew, J., & Dollery, B. (2016). Merger myths: A functional analysis of economies of scale in New South Wales municipalities. Public Finance and Management, 16(4), 362382.Google Scholar
Finnis, J. (2013). Human rights and common good. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golemboski, D. (2015). Federalism and the Catholic principle of subsidiarity. Publius, 45(4), 526551. doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjv005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodin, R., & Wilenski, P. (1984). Beyond efficiency: The logical underpinnings of administrative principles. Public Administration Review, 44(6), 512517. doi.org/10.2307/3110413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, B., & Drew, J. (2017). Local government in Australia: History, theory and public policy. Singapore: Springer Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hittinger, R. (2003). The first grace: Rediscovering the natural law in a post-Christian world. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
Independent Local Government Review Panel. (2013, October). Revitalising local government. Final report. Sydney, Australia: ILGRP. www.localgovernmentreview.nsw.gov.au/documents/LGR/Revitalising%20Local%20Government%20-%20ILGRP%20Final%20Report%20-%20October%202013.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kwon, S., & Feiock, R. (2010). Overcoming barriers to cooperation: Intergovernmental service agreements. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 876884. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02219.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messner, J. (1952). Social ethics: Natural law in the modern world (Doherty, J., Trans.). St. Louis, MO: Herder Book Co.Google Scholar
Murphy, A. (2018). Bond pricing in the biggest city bankruptcy in history: The effects of state emergency management laws on default risk. International Review of Law and Economics, 54, 106117. doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.12.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, W. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 11201149. doi.org/10.1257/jel.37.3.1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Subnational governments in OECD countries: Key data. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Pius, XI. (1931). Quadragesimo anno. Vatican City: The Holy See.Google Scholar
Schachter, H. (2007). Does Frederick Taylor’s ghost still haunt the halls of government? A look at the concept of government efficiency in our time. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 800810. doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00768.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirico, R. (1997). Subsidiarity, society and entitlements: Understanding and application. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy, 11, 549579.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (2014). The wealth of nations. Middletown, DE: Shine Classics.Google Scholar
Tamworth Regional Council. (2018). Audited financial statements 2017–18. Tamworth, Australia: Tamworth Regional Council.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×