Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Arabic Applied Linguistics
- Part II Arabic Variation and Sociolinguistics
- Part III Theoretical and Descriptive Studies
- 12 Grammaticalization in Arabic
- 13 Arabic and Onomastics
- 14 The Intonation of Arabic
- 15 Case in Arabic
- 16 On Arabic Morphosyntax and Its Implications for the Theory of Generative Grammar
- 17 Arabic Morphology
- Part IV Arabic Computational and Corpus Linguistics
- Part V Arabic Linguistics and New Media Studies
- Part VI Arabic Linguistics in Literature and Translation
- Index
- References
15 - Case in Arabic
from Part III - Theoretical and Descriptive Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 September 2021
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I Arabic Applied Linguistics
- Part II Arabic Variation and Sociolinguistics
- Part III Theoretical and Descriptive Studies
- 12 Grammaticalization in Arabic
- 13 Arabic and Onomastics
- 14 The Intonation of Arabic
- 15 Case in Arabic
- 16 On Arabic Morphosyntax and Its Implications for the Theory of Generative Grammar
- 17 Arabic Morphology
- Part IV Arabic Computational and Corpus Linguistics
- Part V Arabic Linguistics and New Media Studies
- Part VI Arabic Linguistics in Literature and Translation
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter provides an overview of case morphology in Arabic starting with a discussion of the place of case in Arabic linguistic analysis and its historical basis. Ryding then proceeds to discuss contemporary case theory, valence theory, the lexicalist hypothesis, and case hierarchy theory as they apply to Arabic. She provides an overview of Arabic case morphology and examples of Arabic declensions before describing and analysing each of the three Arabic cases: nominative, genitive, and accusative, including a discussion of accusative/genitive syncretism and peripheral case categories such as the vocative.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Arabic Linguistics , pp. 353 - 370Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Abdul-Raof, H. (2006). Case roles. In Versteegh, K., Eid, M., Elgibali, A., Woidich, M., and Zaborski, A., eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. I. Leiden: Brill, 343–7.Google Scholar
Al-Balushi, R. (2015). The accusative case suffixes in standard Arabic: Where from? International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 1(1), 28–66.Google Scholar
Al-Khalīl ibn Aḥmad Al-Farāhīdī. (1987). Kitāb al-jumal fī l-naḥw, Al-Dīn Qabāwa, Fakhr, ed. Beirut: Muʼassasat al-Risāla.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (2006). Modern Grammars of Case: A Retrospective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (2009). Case in localist case grammar. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 121–35.Google Scholar
Anghelescu, N. (1999). Modalities and grammaticalization in Arabic. In Suleiman, Y., ed., Arabic Grammar and Linguistics. Oxford: Routledge, 130–42.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (2015). Case: Its Principles and Its Parameters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bravmann, M. M. (1961). Genetic aspects of the genitive in the Semitic languages. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 81(4), 386–94.Google Scholar
Butt, M. (2009). Modern approaches to case: An overview. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–43.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1970). Remarks on nominalization. In Jacobs, R. and Rosenbaum, P., eds., Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA: Ginn and Company, 184–221.Google Scholar
Cohen, E. (2019). Semitic genitive constructions: An expanded view. Journal of Semitic Studies, 64(1), 1–50.Google Scholar
Daniel, M. and Spencer, A. (2009). The vocative: An outlier case. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 626–34.Google Scholar
Danks, W. (2011). The Arabic Verb: Form and Meaning in the Vowel-Lengthening Patterns. Amsterdam. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Edzard, L. (2006). Declension. In Versteegh, K., Eid, M., Elgibali, A., Woidich, M., and Zaborski, A., eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. I. Leiden: Brill, 559–64.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1970). Myths about Arabic. In Fishman, J. A., ed., Readings in the Sociology of Language. The Hague: Mouton, 375–81.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. and Harms, R. T., eds., Universals in Linguistic Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1–88.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. (1977). The case for case reopened. In Cole, P. and Saddock, J. M., eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 8: Grammatical Relations. New York: Academic Press, 59–81.Google Scholar
Fleisch, H. (1961). Traité de Philologie Arabe, vol. 1. Beyrouth: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Gisborne, N. (2015). The word and syntax. In Taylor, J. W., ed., The Oxford Handbook of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 196–220.Google Scholar
Glanville, P. J. (2018). The Lexical Semantics of the Arabic Verb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldenberg, G. (2012). Semitic Languages: Features, Structures, Relations, Processes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guillaume, J. (1981). Le statut des représentations sous-jacentes en morphophonologie d’après Ibn Ğinni. Arabica, 28 (2–3), 222–41.Google Scholar
Ḥasan, A. (1987). Al-naḥw al-wāfī [The Complete Grammar], vol. II. Cairo: Dār al-Maʻārif.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. (2009). Terminology of case. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 505–17.Google Scholar
Hasselbach, R. (2013). Case in Semitic: Roles, Relations, and Reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hewson, J. and Bubenik, V. (2006). From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1972). La catégorie des cas: Étude de grammaire générale. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Kittilä, S. and Malchukov, A. (2009). Varieties of the accusative. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 549–61.Google Scholar
LeTourneau, M. S. (2006). Case theory. In Versteegh, K., M. Eid, A. Elgibali, M. Woidich, and A. Zaborski
, eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. I. Leiden: Brill, 347–53.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maalej, Z. (2009). Valency. In Versteegh, K., Eid, M., Elgibali, A., Woidich, M., and Zaborski, A., eds., Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, vol. IV. Leiden: Brill, 624–7.Google Scholar
Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A. (2009a). The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A. (2009b). Typology of case systems: Parameters of variation. In Malchukov, A. and Spencer, A., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Case. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 651–67.Google Scholar
Moscati, S. (1958). On Semitic case-endings. Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 17, 142–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, Å. (2006). Case semantics and the agent-patient opposition. In Kulikov, L., Malchukov, A., and de Swart, P., eds., Case, Valency and Transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 309–27.Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J. (1997). Genitive subjects and the VSO order. In Hall, T. and Alexiadou, A., eds., Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 197–218.Google Scholar
Owens, J. (1990). Early Arabic Grammatical Theory: Heterogeneity and Standardization. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rabin, C. (1965). The diptote declension. In Makdisi, G., ed., Arabic and Islamic Studies in Honor of Hamilton A. R. Gibb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 547–62.Google Scholar
Rappaport-Hovav, M. and Levin, B. (1998). Building verb meanings. In Butt, M. and Geuder, W., eds., The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 97–134Google Scholar
Ryding, K. C. (1993). Case/mood syncretism in Arabic grammatical theory: Evidence for the split morphology hypothesis and the continuum hypothesis. In Rammuny, R. M. and Parkinson, D. B., eds., Investigating Arabic: Linguistic, Pedagogical and Literary Studies in Honor of Ernest N. McCarus. Columbus, OH: Greyden Press, 173–9.Google Scholar
Ryding, K. C. (1998). Early Medieval Arabic: Studies on Al-Khalīl ibn Aḥmad. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ryding, K. C. (2005). A Reference Grammar of Modern Standard Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryding, K. C. (2014). Arabic: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sadler, L. and Spencer, A. (1998). Morphology and argument structure. In Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A., eds., The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 206–36.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. and Guevara, E. (2005). The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R., eds., Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 147–87.Google Scholar
Sībawayhi, ʻAmr ibn ʻUthmān. (1991). Kitāb Sībawayhi, ed. Hārūn, ʻAbd al-Salām Muḥammad. 5 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Jīl.Google Scholar
Somers, H. L. (1987). Valency and Case in Computational Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, G. T. (1998). Inflection. In Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A., eds., The Handbook of Morphology. Oxford: Blackwell, 13–43.Google Scholar
Stump, G. T. (2005). Word-formation and inflectional morphology. In Štekauer, P. and Lieber, R., eds., Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Versteegh, K., Eid, M. Elgibali, A., Woidich, M., and Zaborski, A. (2006–2009). Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics. 4 vols. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Versteegh, K. (2010). Review of A Linguistic History of Arabic (Owens 2006). Language, 86(1), 241–4.Google Scholar
Workshop on Non-Canonicity in Inflection. (2019). Linguist List announcement 30.960. University of Surrey, Guilford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Wright, W. [1859] (1997). A Grammar of the Arabic Language, 3rd ed., rev. by Smith, W. R. and de Goeje, M. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zwettler, M. (1978). The Oral Tradition of Classical Arabic Poetry: Its Character and Implications. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. (1990). Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar. In Dressler, W. U., Luschutzky, H. C., Pfeiffer, O. E., and Rennison, J. R., eds., Contemporary Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 217–36.Google Scholar