Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Economics of Antitrust-IP
- Part II Institutional Design: Country Overviews
- 5 Antitrust and Intellectual Property: A Brief Introduction
- 6 The Antitrust and Intellectual Property Intersection in European Union Law
- 7 The IP–Antitrust Interface in China: Uncharted Territory
- 8 Intellectual Property and Antitrust in Japan
- 9 Competition Law and Intellectual Property in Korea
- Part III Monopolization
- Part IV Competitor Collaboration
- Part V Vertical Relations
- Part VI Mergers in High Technology
- Index
- References
9 - Competition Law and Intellectual Property in Korea
from Part II - Institutional Design: Country Overviews
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2017
By
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- The Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property, and High Tech
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Economics of Antitrust-IP
- Part II Institutional Design: Country Overviews
- 5 Antitrust and Intellectual Property: A Brief Introduction
- 6 The Antitrust and Intellectual Property Intersection in European Union Law
- 7 The IP–Antitrust Interface in China: Uncharted Territory
- 8 Intellectual Property and Antitrust in Japan
- 9 Competition Law and Intellectual Property in Korea
- Part III Monopolization
- Part IV Competitor Collaboration
- Part V Vertical Relations
- Part VI Mergers in High Technology
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Jin, Hyunsuk. 2015, Ensuring Effectiveness of Marketing Prevention and First Generic Exclusivity, in ICR Law Center, Current issues of the Drug Approval-Patent Linkage System. Available at http://media.wix.com/ugd/7496b6_7ecee32e982a4839a11eb4beb0e8ea51.pdf.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, Bruce H., Ginsburg, Douglas H., Wong-Ervin, Koren W., and Wright, Joshua D.. 2015. Comment on the Korea Fair Trade Commission’s Revised Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights, George Mason University Legal Studies Research Paper Series LS 15–35.Google Scholar
Lee, Hwang. 2014. Actavis Decision in U.S on Reverse Payment and Its Implication. Judicial Practice Review, 11(2), 551–92 (in Korean).Google Scholar
Noh, Sangsup. 2011. The Current Status of the Operation of IPR Guideline and Future Tasks. In ICR Law Center, Regulatory Framework for Licensing of Intellectual Property Rights, 2011 ICR Law Center Seminar Series: 519–39 (in Korean).Google Scholar
Wright, Joshua D., Wong-Ervin, Koren W., Ginsburg, Douglas H., and Kobayashi, Bruce H.. 2016. Comment of the Global Antitrust Institute, George Mason University School of Law, on the Korea Fair Trade Commission’s Amendment to Its Review Guidelines on Unfair Exercise of Intellectual Property Rights.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yi, Sangseung. 2015. Responsibilities of FRAND-Encumbered SEP Owners under Competition Law. In Legal and Economic Analysis on SEP Holder’s Abuse of Patent Rights, Sogang University Conference, 96–139.Google Scholar