Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-dc8c957cd-mn2s7 Total loading time: 3.385 Render date: 2022-01-27T16:20:48.336Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Part I - Theories of development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Brian Hopkins
Lancaster University
Elena Geangu
Lancaster University
Sally Linkenauger
Lancaster University
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Baerveldt, C. (2013). Constructivism contested: Implications of a genetic perspective in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 47, 156166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baltes, P.B., Rösler, F., & Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. (2006). Prologue: Biocultural co-constructivism as a theoretical metascript. In Baltes, P.B., Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., & Rösler, F. (Eds.), Lifespan development and the brain: The perspective of biocultural co-constructivism (pp. 339). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H.M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 10851108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newcombe, N.S. (2011). What is neoconstructivism? Child Development Perspectives, 5, 157160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, J.P., & Buss, A.T. (2011). Finding a way out: Why developmental science does not need another “ism.” Child Development Perspectives, 5, 166168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. (1982). Brainstorms. Brighton, UK: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained. New York, NY: Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company.
Edelman, G. (1987). Neural darwinism. The theory of neuronal group selection. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: The control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological Review, 87(6), 477–531.CrossRef
Fischer, K.W., & Bidell, T.R. (2006). Dynamic development of action and thought. In Damon, W. & Lerner, R.M. (Eds.), Theoretical models of human development. Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 313399). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fischer, K.W. & Van Geert, P. (2014). Dynamic development of brain and behavior. In Molenaar, P.C.M., Lerner, R.M., & Newell, K.M. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental systems theory and methodology (pp. 287315). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J.A. (1975). The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology: Vygotsky, his disciples and critics. American Psychologist, 41, 264274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont’ev, A.N. (1976). Tätigkeit, Bewusstsein, Persönlichkeit. Berlin (DDR): Volk und Wissen.Google Scholar
Mascolo, M., Van Geert, P.L.C., Steenbeek, H.W., & Fischer, K.W. (2015). What can dynamic systems models of development offer to the study of developmental psychopathology? In Cicchetti, D. (Ed.), Developmental psychopathology (3rd ed., pp. 665–716), New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moessinger, P. (1977). Piaget on contradiction. Human Development, 20, 178184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, H.J., & Friston, K. (2013). Structural and functional brain networks: From connections to cognition. Science, 342, 1238411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The child’s construction of reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1971/2015). Structuralism. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (2001). Studies in reflecting abstraction. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Steenbeek, H., & Van Geert, P. (2007). A theory and dynamic model of dyadic interaction: Concerns, appraisals, and contagiousness in a developmental context. Developmental Review, 27(1), 1–40.CrossRef
Steenbeek, H., & Van Geert, P. (2008). A dynamic systems approach to dyadic interaction in children: Emotional expression, action, dyadic play, and sociometric status. Developmental Review, 27, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenbeek, H., & Van Geert, P. (2013). The emergence of learning–teaching trajectories in education: A complex dynamic systems approach. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 17, 233267.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomassello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1994). Culture and human development: A co-constructionist perspective. In van Geert, P. (Ed.), Annals of theoretical psychology (pp. 247298). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Malden, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1986). The concept of development. In Van Geert, P. (Ed.), Theory building in developmental psychology (pp. 350). Amsterdam, NL: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1994). Dynamic systems of development. Change between complexity and chaos. New York, NY: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Van Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond. Psychological Review, 105, 634677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25, 408442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80, 121140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westermann, G., Mareschal, D., Johnson, M.H., Sirois, S., Spratling, M.W., & Thomas, M.S.C. (2007). Neuroconstructivism. Developmental Science, 10, 7583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolhuis, J.J., & Giraldeau, L.-A. (Eds.) (2004). The behavior of animals. Mechanisms, function, and evolution. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J.J., & Giraldeau, L.-A. (Eds.) (2015). Cause and function in behavioral biology: A tribute to Jerry Hogan. Behavioural Processes, 117, 1113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, J.J., Brown, M.W., & Johnson, M.H. (Eds.) (2015). Brain, memory and development: The imprint of Gabriel Horn. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 50, 1203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, S. (2000). Attachment and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, M.D.S., Blehar, M.C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the strange situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bateson, P.P.G. (1987). Imprinting as a process of competitive exclusion. In Rauschecker, J.P. & Marler, P. (Eds.), Imprinting and cortical plasticity (pp. 151168). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bateson, P., & Hinde, R.A. (1987). Developmental changes in sensitivity to experience. In Bornstein, M.H. (Ed.), Sensitive periods in development (pp. 1934). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berwick, R.C., Okanoya, K., Beckers, G.J.L., & Bolhuis, J.J. (2011). Songs to syntax: The linguistics of birdsong. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 113121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berwick, R.C., Friederici, A.D., Chomsky, N., & Bolhuis, J.J. (2013). Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 8998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, J.J. (1991). Mechanisms of avian imprinting: A review. Biological Reviews, 66, 303345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolhuis, J.J., & Hogan, J.A. (Eds.) (1999). The development of animal behavior: A reader. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J.J., & Everaert, M. (Eds.) (2013). Birdsong, speech & language. Exploring the evolution of mind and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J.J., Okanoya, K., & Scharff, C. (2010). Twitter evolution: Converging mechanisms in birdsong and human speech. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 747759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature–nurture: Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harlow, H.F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13, 573685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J.A. (1988). Cause and function in the development of behavior systems. In Blass, E.M. (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology. Vol. 9, Developmental psychobiology and behavioral ecology (pp. 63106). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J.A. (2001). Development of behavior systems. In Blass, E.M. (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, Vol. 13 (pp. 229279). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Hogan, J.A. (2015). A framework for the study of behavior. Behavioural Processes, 117, 105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, G. (1985). Memory, imprinting, and the brain. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.H., & Bolhuis, J.J. (2000). Predispositions in perceptual and cognitive development. In Bolhuis, J.J. (Ed.), Brain, perception, memory. Advances in cognitive neuroscience (pp. 6984). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M.H., Bolhuis, J.J., & Horn, G. (1985). Interaction between acquired preferences and developing predispositions during imprinting. Animal Behaviour, 33, 10001006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konishi, M. (1965). The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 22, 770783.Google ScholarPubMed
Kruijt, J.P. (1964). Ontogeny of social behavior in Burmese red junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour Supplement, 9, 1201.Google Scholar
Kuhl, P.K. (2010). Brain mechanisms in early language acquisition. Neuron, 67, 713732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K. (2015). Early language learning and the social brain. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 79, 211220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehrman, D.S. (1953). A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, 337363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehrman, D.S. (1970). Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature–nurture problem. In Aronson, L.R., Tobach, E., Lehrman, D.S., & Rosenblatt, J.S. (Eds.), Development and evolution of behavior (pp. 1752). San Francisco, CA: Freeman.Google Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal fur Ornithologie, 83, 137213, 289413. [Translation (1970), Companions as factors in the bird’s environment. In Studies in Animal and Human Behavior, 1 (pp. 101–258). London, UK: Methuen.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. (1965). Evolution and modification of behavior. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marler, P. (1970). A comparative approach to vocal learning: Song development in white-crowned sparrows. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 71, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sluckin, W., & Salzen, E.A. (1961). Imprinting and perceptual learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 8, 6577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kampen, H.S. (1996). A framework for the study of filial imprinting and the development of attachment. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arthur, W. (2011). Evolution: A developmental approach. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laubichler, M.D., & Maienschein, J., Eds. (2007). From embryos to evo devo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Minelli, A. (2009). Forms of becoming: The evolutionary biology of development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sansom, R., & Brandon, R.N., Eds. (2007). Integrating evolution and development: From theory to practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Buller, D.J. (2005). Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Calkins, S.D. (2011). Caregiving as co-regulation: Psychobiological processes and child functioning. In Booth, A., McHale, S.M., & Landale, N.S. (Eds.), Biosocial foundations of family processes (pp. 4959). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1994). Origins of domain specificity: The evolution of functional organization. In Hirschfeld, L.A. & Gelman, S.A. (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 85116). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D.C., & Bjorklund, D.F. (2000). Evolutionary developmental psychology. Child Development, 71, 5765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerhart, J., & Kirschner, M. (1997). Cells, embryos, and evolution: Toward a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability (No. 575.21 GER). Malden, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Gilbert, S.F. (2006). The generation of novelty: The province of developmental biology. Biological Theory, 1, 209212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, S.F., & Epel, D. (2009). Ecological developmental biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Huxley, T.H. (1893). Darwiniana. Collected essays. Volume II. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jacobson, M. (2013). Developmental neurobiology. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (2014). Equal time for psychological and biological contributions to human variation. Review of General Psychology, 17, 351357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschner, M.W., & Gerhart, J.C. (2006). The plausibility of life: Resolving Darwin’s dilemma. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, G.F., & Moore, C.L. (1995). Developmental psychobiology: An interdisciplinary science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Michel, G.F., & Tyler, A.N. (2007). Can knowledge of developmental processes illuminate the evolution of parental care? Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 3344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, G.F., Nelson, E.L., Babik, I., Campbell, J.M., & Marcinowski, E.C. (2013). Multiple trajectories in the developmental psychobiology of human handedness. In Lerner, R.M. & Benson, J.B. (Eds.), Embodiment and epigenesis: Theoretical and methodological issues in understanding the role of biology within the relational developmental system part b: ontogenetic dimensions (pp. 227260). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Raff, R.A. (1996). The shape of life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schlichting, C.D., & Pigliucci, M. (1998). Phenotypic evolution: A reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Silver, J., Lorenz, S.E., Wahlsten, D., & Coughlin, J. (1982). Axonal guidance during development of the great cerebral commissures: Descriptive and experimental studies, in vivo, on the role of preformed glial pathways. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 210, 1029.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Uexküll, J. (1957). A stroll through the world of animals and men. In Schiller, C.H. (Ed.), Instinctive behavior (pp. 580). New York, NY: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Waber, D.P. (1977). Sex differences in mental abilities, hemispheric lateralization, and rate of physical growth at adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 13, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, M.J., King, A.P., & Arberg, A.A. (1988). The inheritance of niches: The role of ecological legacies in ontogeny. In Blass, E.M. (Ed.), Handbook of behavioral neurobiology, Vol. 9: Developmental psychobiology and behavioral ecology (pp. 4162). New York, NY: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.Google Scholar
Wright, R. (1994). The moral animal: Why we are the way we are: Evolutionary psychology and everyday life. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Aslin, S. (2014). Infant learning: Historical, conceptual, and methodological challenges. Infancy, 19, 227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G. (2010). Recognizing communicative intentions in infancy. Mind & Language, 25, 141168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2011). Natural pedagogy as evolutionary adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 11491157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H.M. (2012). Reconstructing constructivism: Causal models, Bayesian learning mechanisms, and the theory theory. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K.N. (2013). Social learning: An introduction to mechanisms, methods, and models. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1996). Social cognitive theory of human development. In Husen, T. & Postlethwaite, T.N. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 55135518). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Butler, L.P., & Markman, E.M. (2012). Preschoolers use intentional and pedagogical cues to guide inductive inferences and exploration. Child Development, 83, 14161428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colunga, E., & Smith, L.B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: A role for associative learning. Psychological Review, 112, 347382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Csibra, G., & Shamsudheen, R. (2015). Nonverbal generics: Human infants interpret objects as symbols of object kinds. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 689710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewar, K.M., & Xu, F. (2010). Induction, overhypothesis, and the origin of abstract knowledge evidence from 9-month-old infants. Psychological Science, 21, 18711877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egyed, K., Király, I., & Gergely, G. (2013). Communicating shared knowledge in infancy. Psychological Science, 24, 13481353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
French, R.M., Mareschal, D., Mermillod, M., & Quinn, P.C. (2004). The role of bottom-up processing in perceptual categorization by 3- to 4-month-old infants: Simulations and data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 382397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giles, A., & Rovee-Collier, C. (2011). Infant long-term memory for associations formed during mere exposure. Infant Behavior and Development, 34, 327338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gweon, H., Tenenbaum, J.B., & Schulz, L.E. (2010). Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 90669071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernik, M., & Csibra, G. (2015). Infants learn enduring functions of novel tools from action demonstrations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 130, 176192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, V., & Whiten, A. (2005). Causal knowledge and imitation/emulation switching in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and children (Homo sapiens). Animal Cognition, 8, 164181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, L., Vlach, H.A., & Johnson, S.P. (2013). Statistical learning across development: Flexible yet constrained. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kushnir, T., Xu, F., & Wellman, H.M. (2010). Young children use statistical sampling to infer the preferences of other people. Psychological Science, 21, 11341140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, M., Leslie, S.J., & Tworek, C.M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 1352613531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saffran, J.R., Aslin, R.N., & Newport, E.L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 19261928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scaife, M., & Bruner, J.S. (1975). The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant. Nature, 253, 265266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Senju, A., & Csibra, G. (2008). Gaze following in human infants depends on communicative signals. Current Biology, 18, 668671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, F., & Kushnir, T. (2013). Infants are rational constructivist learners. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 2832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J.B. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114, 245272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yoon, J.M., Johnson, M.H., & Csibra, G. (2008). Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1369013695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Younger, B.A., & Cohen, L.B. (1983). Infant perception of correlations among attributes. Child Development, 54, 858867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McClelland, J.L., Botvinick, M.M., Noelle, D.C., Plaut, D.C., Rogers, T.T., Seidenberg, M.S., & Smith, L.B. (2010). Letting structure emerge: Connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 348356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmering, V.R., Schutte, A.R., & Spencer, J.P. (2008). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales. In Becker, S. (Ed.), Computational cognitive neuroscience [special issue]. Brain Research, 1202, 6886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thelen, E. (2001). Dynamic mechanisms of change in early perceptual-motor development. In J.L. McClelland & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Mechanisms of cognitive development: Behavioral and neural perspectives (pp. 161184). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (2006). Dynamic systems theories. In Lerner, R.M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume One: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 313399). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Adolph, K.E., Eppler, M.A., & Gibson, E.J. (1993). Crawling versus walking infants’ perception of affordances for locomotion over sloping surfaces. Child Development, 64, 11581174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adolph, K.E., Robinson, S.R., Young, J.W., & Gill-Alvarez, F. (2008). What is the shape of developmental change? Psychological Review, 115, 527543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism Language and Cognition, 10, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dishion, T.H., Nelson, S.E., Winter, C.E., & Bullock, B.M. (2004). Adolescent friendship as a dynamical system: Entropy and deviance in the etiology and course of male antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 32, 651663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.D., Lamey, A.V., & Douglas, L. (1999). A new dynamic systems methods for the analysis of early socioemotional development. Developmental Science, 2, 457475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munakata, Y. (2006). Information processing approaches to cognitive development. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Volume Two: Cognition, perception, & language (6th ed., pp. 426463). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutte, A.R., & Spencer, J.P. (2002). Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: Three-year-olds’ delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. Child Development, 73, 377404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schutte, A., Spencer, J.P., & Schöner, G. (2003). Testing the dynamic field theory: Working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. Child Development, 74, 13931417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. (1992). Development as a dynamic system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 189193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., & Spencer, J.P. (1996). Development of reaching during the first year: Role of movement speed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 10591076.Google ScholarPubMed
Thelen, E., Fisher, D.M., & Ridley-Johnson, R. (1984). The relationship between physical growth and a newborn reflex. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 479493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L.B. (2001). The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). Explaining after by before: Basic aspects of a dynamic systems approach to the study of development. Developmental Review, 25, 408442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Geert, P., & Van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior & Development, 25, 340374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vereijken, B., & Thelen, E. (1997). Training infant treadmill stepping: The role of individual pattern stability. Developmental Psychobiology, 30, 89102.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats