Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5c569c448b-s84wp Total loading time: 0.79 Render date: 2022-07-03T06:42:28.165Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

R

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Ian A. McFarland
Affiliation:
Emory University's Candler School of Theology
David A. S. Fergusson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Karen Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Iain R. Torrance
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Ian A. McFarland
Affiliation:
Emory University, Atlanta
David A. S. Fergusson
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Karen Kilby
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Iain R. Torrance
Affiliation:
Princeton Theological Seminary
Get access

Summary

Race Race is a category by which individuals, groups, and societies interpret diversity in the human family. As a way of making sense, race is founded in the interpretation of differences between human groups – most often differences in melanin content (colour), facial features, hair texture, and also culture. The primary function of race has been both to catalogue and, more significantly, to attribute meaning to these observed differences. The construction and continuing use of the category of race represents a particularly modern approach to a broader human tendency to construct regimes of knowledge that both ground and explain systems of socio-political hegemony by appeal to some putative substantial differences between peoples. While it has been a highly unstable category, race has been enduring in the modern period because of its presumed status as an objective description of reality. This use of race to legitimate systems of social power is a good point from which to explore the idea theologically. Such an exploration begins with some description of the interplay of religion and the social sciences during the formative period of modernity.

Race evolved as a sense-making tool during the period of western global hegemony – modernity – that also saw the rise of the modern physical and social sciences (see Natural Science). During this period Christianity (and religion more generally) was being challenged by the emerging scientific world view, yet during the eighteenth and much of the nineteenth century Christian assumptions about human history (including God's providential guidance of it) continued to frame the field of vision for these sciences.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brace, C. L., Race is a Four Letter Word: The Genesis of the Concept (Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Carter, J. K., Race: A Theological Account (Oxford University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynes, S., Noah's Curse: The Biblical Justification of American Slavery (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Milbank, J., Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason, 2nd edn (Wiley-Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar
Milbank, J., Pickstock, C., and Ward, G., eds., Radical Orthodoxy: A New Theology (Routledge, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, S. and Milbank, J., eds., The Radical Orthodoxy Reader (Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Smith, J. K. A., Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: Towards a Post-Secular Worldview (Baker Academic, 2004).Google Scholar
Endean, P., Karl Rahner and Ignatian Spirituality (Oxford University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Kilby, K., Rahner: Theology and Philosophy (Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmion, D. and Hines, M., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Karl Rahner (Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahner, K., Encounters with Silence, 2nd edn (St Augustine's Press, 1999 [1937]).Google Scholar
Dawkins, R., The God Delusion (Houghton Mifflin, 2006).Google Scholar
Nelson, A., ed., A Companion to Rationalism (Blackwell, 2005).Google Scholar
Neville, R. C., The Highroad around Modernism (SUNY, 1992).Google Scholar
Kaufman, G., In Face of Mystery (Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Marshall, B., Trinity and Truth (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Moore, A., Realism and Christian Faith (Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soskice, J. M., Metaphor and Religious Language (Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Benedict, P., Christ's Churches Purely Reformed: A Social History of Calvinism (Yale University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Brecht, M., Martin Luther, 3 vols. (Fortress Press, 1985–93).Google Scholar
Cameron, E., The European Reformation, 2nd edn (Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
MacCulloch, D., The Reformation (Viking Books, 2004).Google Scholar
Pettegree, A., ed., The Reformation World (Routledge, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, A. and Wolterstorff, N., eds. Faith and Rationality: Reason and Belief in God (University of Notre Dame Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Plantinga, A., Warranted Christian Belief (Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, K., On Religion: The Revelation of God as the Sublimation of Religion (T&T Clark, 2006 [1932]).Google Scholar
James, W., The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature (Longmans, Green and Co., 1902).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knitter, P., Introducing Theologies of Religion (Orbis, 2002).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F., On Religion: Speeches to Its Cultured Despisers (John Knox Press, 1994 [1799]).Google Scholar
Smart, N., Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World's Beliefs (University of California Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Smith, W. C., The Meaning and End of Religion: A New Approach to the Religious Traditions of Mankind (Macmillan, 1963).Google Scholar
Ricœur, P., Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning (Texas Christian University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Stiver, D. R., The Philosophy of Religious Language: Sign, Symbol, and Story (Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, N., Divine Discourse: Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks (Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. T. and Allen, C. L., Illusions of Innocence: Protestant Primitivism in America, 1630–1875 (University of Chicago Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Littell, F. H., The Origins of Sectarian Protestantism (Macmillan, 1952); reprinted as The Anabaptist View of the Church (Baptist Standard Bearer, 2001).Google Scholar
Abraham, W. J., Crossing the Threshold of Divine Revelation (Eerdmans, 2007).Google Scholar
Dulles, A., Models of Divine Revelation (Doubleday, 1983).Google Scholar
King, R., Obstacles to Divine Revelation: God and the Reorientation of Human Reason (Continuum, 2008).Google Scholar
Mavrodes, G., Revelation in Religious Belief (Temple University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Menssen, S. and Sullivan, T., The Agnostic Inquirer: Revelation from a Philosophical Standpoint (Eerdmans, 2007).Google Scholar
Mitchell, B., The Justification of Religious Belief (Seabury Press, 1974).Google Scholar
Kidd, T. S., The Great Awakening: The Roots of Evangelical Christianity in Colonial America (Yale University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Ward, W. R., The Protestant Evangelical Awakening (Cambridge University Press, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, R., Tradition in the Early Church (Westminster Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Florovsky, G., The Collected Works of Georges Florovsky, vols. V–VI: Ways of Russian Theology (Vaduz and Belmont, 1987).Google Scholar
Gnedich, P., Dogmat iskupleniya v russkoi bogoslovskoi nauke (Sretenskii monastyr, Moskovskaia dukhovnaia akademiia, 2007).Google Scholar
Gromov, M. N., Ideinye techenia drevnerusskoi mysli (Izd-vo Russkogo Khristianskogo gumanitarnogo in-ta, 2001).Google Scholar
Kornblatt, J. D. and Gustafson, R. F., eds., Russian Religious Thought (University of Wisconsin Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Valliere, P., Modern Russian Theology: Bukharev, Soloviev, Bulgakov: Orthodox Theology in a New Key (Eerdmans, 2000).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×