Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-4wks4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-04-01T16:20:03.429Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2021

Edited by
Jens Meierhenrich  and
Martin Loughlin
Jens Meierhenrich
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
Martin Loughlin
Affiliation:
London School of Economics
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law , pp. 622 - 681
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Purchase

Buy Book

Buy print or eBook[Opens in a new window]

References

Abasiattai, Monday, “European Intervention in Liberia with Special Reference to the ‘Cadell Incident’ of 1908–1909,” Liberian Studies Journal, 14 (1989), 72–90.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard, Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle against Apartheid, 1980–1994 (London: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., Law’s Wars: The Fate of the Rule of Law in the U.S. “War on Terror” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abel, Richard L., Law’s Trials: The Performance of Legal Institutions in the U.S. “War on Terror” (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abelove, Henry, Blackmar, Betsy, Dimock, Peter, and Schneer, Jonathan, eds., Visions of History (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A., Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce, We the People: Foundations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Adams, Maurice, Meuwese, Anne, and Hirsch Ballin, Ernst, eds., Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akingbade, Harrison, “The Pacification of the Liberian Hinterland,” Journal of Negro History, 79 (1994), 277–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., The Meanings of Social Life: A Cultural Sociology (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aliverti, Any, and Bosworth, Mary, “Introduction: Criminal Justice Adjudication in an Age of Migration,” New Criminal Law Review, 20 (2017), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T.R.S., “Dworkin and Dicey: The Rule of Law as Integrity,” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 8 (1988), 266–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., “Rule of Law (Rechtsstaat),” in Craig, Edward, ed., The Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 8 (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 388–391.Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, T. R. S., “The Rule of Law,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Thorburn, Malcolm, eds., Philosophical Foundations of Constitutional Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp. 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, C. K., Law in the Making, 7th ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Allen, Francis A., The Habits of Legality: Criminal Justice and the Rule of Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Alpher, David, “Learning from SIGIR’s Final Report on Iraq Reconstruction,” Middle East Institute, June 12, 2013.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E., “International Organisations and the Rule of Law,” New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 14 (2016), 3–46.Google Scholar
Amadae, S. M., Prisoners of Reason: Game Theory and Neoliberal Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society, American Colonization, A View of Exertions Lately Made for the Purpose of Colonizing the Free People of Color, in the United States, in Africa, or Elsewhere (Washington: Jonathan Elliot, 1817).Google Scholar
American Colonization Society, Sixteenth Annual Report of the American Society for Colonizing the Free People of Colour of the United States (Washington: James Dunn, 1833).Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry, Arguments Within English Marxism (London: Verso, 1980).Google Scholar
Anderson, Perry, “The Intransigent Right at the End of the Century,” London Review of Books, September 24, 1992.Google Scholar
Angelis, Theo J., and Harrison, Jonathan H., “History and Importance of the Rule of Law,” World Justice Project, 2003.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony, Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, Antony, “Legal Aspects of the New International Economic Order,” Humanity, 6 (2015), 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia, “Virtue and Law in Plato,” in Bobonich, Christopher, ed., Plato’s Laws: A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 71–91.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1958] 1973).Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah, Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil, rev. and enlarged ed. (New York: Penguin, [1963] 1992).Google Scholar
Aristotle, The Politics, trans. and ed. Everson, Stephen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Armstrong, S., “Securing Prison through Human Rights: Unanticipated Implications of Rights-Based Penal Reform,” Howard Journal of Crime and Justice, 57 (2018), 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arndt, H. W., “The Origins of Dicey’s Concept of the Rule of Law,” Australian Law Journal, 31 (1957), 117–123.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J., “Mill versus Paternalism,” Ethics, 90 (1980), 470–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, A., Sentencing and Criminal Justice, 5th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Francis R., “Book Review: Legalism by Judith N. Shklar,” Journal of Politics, 27 (1965), 703–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, 2nd ed. (London: John Murray, 1861).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John, Lectures on Jurisprudence, vol. 2 (London: John Murray, 1863).Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azad, Ghulam Murtaza, “Conduct and Qualities of a Qadi,” Islamic Studies, 24 (1985), 51–61.Google Scholar
Azikiwe, Nnamdi, “In Defense of Liberia,” Journal of Negro History, 17 (1932), 30–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azikiwe, Nnamdi, Liberia in World Politics (Westport: Negro Universities Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Baer, Susanne, “The Rule of – and Not by Any – Law: On Constitutionalism,” Current Legal Problems, 71 (2018), 335–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balot, Ryan K., Greek Political Thought (Oxford: Blackwell, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banner, Stuart, Possessing the Pacific: Land, Settlers, and Indigenous People from Australia to Alaska (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. W., “The Rechtsstaat and the Rule of Law,” University of Toronto Law Journal, 53 (2003), 443–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, N. W., The Principles of Constitutionalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Gill, Oren, and Fershtman, Chaim, “Law and Preferences,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20 (2004), 331–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, Joshua, Corporate Sovereignty: Law and Government Under Capitalism (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Vanessa, Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State (London: Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar
Barkey, Karen, “Aspects of Legal Pluralism in the Ottoman Empire,” in Benton, Lauren and Ross, Richard J., eds., Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850 (New York: New York University Press, 2013) pp. 83–107.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael N., ed., Paternalism beyond Borders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Barrière, Pierre, Un grand provincial: Charles-Louis de Secondat baron de La Brède et de Montesquieu (Bordeaux: Delmas, 1946).Google Scholar
Barros, Robert, Constitutionalism and Dictatorship: Pinochet, the Junta, and the 1980 Constitution (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzel, Yoram, A Theory of the State: Economic Rights, Legal Rights, and the Scope of the State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent, and Weingast Bates, Barry R., Analytic Narratives (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Basu, Kaushik, Prelude to Political Economy: A Study of the Social and Political Foundations of Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateup, Christine, “Expanding the Conversation: American and Canadian Experiences of Constitutional Dialogue in Comparative Perspective,” Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 21 (2007), 1–57.Google Scholar
Baxter, Hugh, Habermas: The Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Bayly,  Christopher, Imperial Meridian: The British Empire and the World 1780–1830 (London: Longman, 1989).Google Scholar
Baynes, Kenneth, and von Schomburg, Rene, eds., Discourse and Democracy: Essays on Between Facts and Norms (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Beard, Jennifer, Political Economy of Desire: International Law, Development and the Nation State (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaud, Olivier, and Heyen, Erk Volkmar, eds., Eine deutsch-französische Rechtswissenschaft? Une science juridique franco-allemande? (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1999).Google Scholar
Beaulac, Stéphane, “The Rule of Law in International Law Today,” in Palombella, Gianluigi and Walker, Neil, eds., Relocating the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009), pp. 197–223.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare, On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings, ed. Richard Bellamy, trans. Richard Davies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1764] 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedau, H. A., “Book Review: Legalism by Judith N. Shklar,” Philosophical Review, 76 (1967), 129–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bederman, David J., “The United Nations Compensation Commission and the Tradition of International Claims Settlement,” New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 27 (1994), 1–42.Google Scholar
Bedjaoui, Mohammed, Towards a New International Economic Order (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1979).Google Scholar
Begon, Jessica, “Paternalism,”Analysis, 76 (2016), 355–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beinart, Ben, “The Rule of Law,” Acta Juridica (1962), 99–114.Google Scholar
Bell, Derrick A., Jr., “Serving Two Masters: Integration Ideals and Client Interests in School Desegregation Litigation,” Yale Law Journal, 85 (1976), 470–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard, “Introduction,” in Beccaria, Cesare, On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings, ed. Richard Bellamy, trans. Richard Davies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1764] 1995), pp. ix–xxx.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla, “International Law and Human Plurality in the Shadow of Totalitarianism: Hannah Arendt and Raphael Lemkin,” in idem, ed., Dignity in Adversity: Human Rights in Troubled Times (Cambridge: Polity, 2011), pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Benrekassa, Georges, Montesquieu: La liberté et l’histoire (Paris: Librairie Générale Française, 1987).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, A Fragment on Government (London: T. Payne, P. Elmsly, E. Brooke, 1776).Google Scholar
Benton, Lauren, Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren, and Ford, Lisa, Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, Lauren, and Ross, Richard J., eds., Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500–1850 (New York: New York University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, “Sovereigns as Trustees of Humanity: On the Accountability of States to Foreign Stakeholders,” American Journal of International Law, 107 (2013), 295–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, Louis-Alexandre, Isser, Deborah, and Porter, Douglas, “Beyond Deficit and Dysfunction: Three Questions toward Just Development in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Settings,” in David Marshall, ed., The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014), pp. 267–294.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, Roger, “Dignity Jurisprudence: Building a New Law on Earth,” in Cornell, Drucilla, Woolman, Stu, Fuller, Sam, Brickhill, Jason, Bishop, Michael, and Diana Dunbar, eds., The Dignity Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of South Africa: Cases and Materials, vol. 1 (New York: Fordham University Press, 2013), pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah, Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas (New York: Viking, 1980).Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J., Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Bernasconi-Osterwalder, Nathalie, and Brauch, Martin Dietrich, “Is ‘Moonlighting’ a Problem? The Role of ICJ Judges in ISDS,” International Institute for Sustainable Development, November 2017.Google Scholar
Besson, Samantha, and Martí, José Luis, eds., Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyan, Amos, The American Colonization Society and the Creation of the Liberian State: A Historical Perspective, 1822–1900 (Lanham: University Press of America, 1991).Google Scholar
Beyme, Klaus von, Politische Theorien im Zeitalter der Ideologien (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2002).Google Scholar
Bhat, Girish N., “Recovering the Historical Rechtsstaat,” Review of Central and East European Law, 32 (2007), 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M., The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Bigo, Didier, “Sociology of Transnational Guilds,” International Political Sociology, 10 (2016), pp. 398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, Tom, The Rule of Law (London: Penguin, 2011).Google Scholar
Binoche, Bertrand, Introduction à De l’esprit des lois de Montesquieu (Paris: PUF, 1998).Google Scholar
Bishop, Charlotte, and Bettison, Vanessa, “Evidencing Domestic Violence, Including Behaviour that Falls Under the New Offence of Controlling or Coercive Behaviour,” International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 22 (2017), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England, vol. 4 (Chicago: Chicago University Press, [1765] 1979).Google Scholar
Blair, Harry, and Hansen, Garry, Weighing in on the Scales of Justice: Strategic Approaches for Donor-Supported Rule of Law Programs (Washington: US Agency for International Development, 1994).Google Scholar
Blaau, Loammi C., “The Rechtsstaat Idea Compared with the Rule of Law as a Paradigm for Protecting Rights,” South African Law Journal, 107 (1990), 76–96.Google Scholar
Bobbio, Norberto, Thomas Hobbes and the Natural Law Tradition, trans. Daniela Gobetti (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, “Lorenz von Stein als Theoretiker der Bewegung von Staat und Gesellschaft zum Sozialstaat,” in idem, Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit: Studien zur Staatstheorie und zum Verfassungsrecht (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, [1963] 1976), pp. 146–185.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, “Entstehung und Wandel des Rechtsstaatsbegriffs,” in idem, Recht, Staat, Freiheit: Studien zu Rechtsphilosophie, Staatstheorie und Verfassungsgeschichte, Expanded ed. (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, [1969] 2006), pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, “The Origin and Development of the Concept of the Rechtsstaat,” in idem, State, Society and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law, trans. J. A. Underwood (New York: Berg, [1969] 1991), pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, “The Concept of the Political: A Key to Understanding Carl Schmitt’s Constitutional Theory,” in idem, Constitutional and Political Theory: Selected Writings, eds. Künkler, Mirjam and Stein, Tine (Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1988] 2018), pp. 69–85.Google Scholar
Boesche, Roger, “Fearing Monarchs and Merchants: Montesquieu’s Two Theories of Despotism,” Western Political Science Quarterly, 43 (1990), 741–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogg, Alan L, and Freedland, Mark R., “Labour Law in the Age of Populism: Towards Sustainable Democratic Engagement,” Research Paper. No. 2018–15, Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, July 2018.Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, Giorgio, “Rechtsstaat and Constitutional Justice in Austria: Hans Kelsen’s Contribution,” in Costa, Pietro and Zolo, Danilo, eds., The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007), pp. 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothe, Michael, “Terrorism and the Legality of Pre-emptive Force,” European Journal of International Law, 14 (2003), 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, David, “The Rule of Law in the Modern European State: Oakeshott and the Enlargement of Europe,” European Journal of Political Theory, 4 (2005), 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandes, Tamar Hostovsky, “International Law in Domestic Courts in an Era of Populism,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 17 (2019), 576–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, Heather L., “Understanding Change: Evolution from International Claims Commissions to Investment Treaty Arbitration,” in Schill, Stephan W., Tams, Christian J., and Hofmann, Rainer, eds., International Investment Law and History (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 102–135.Google Scholar
Bridges, Khiara M., “On the Commodification of the Black Female Body: The Critical Implications of a Market in Fetal Tissue,” Columbia Law Review, 102 (2002), 123–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brower, Charles N., and Blanchard, Sadie, “From ‘Dealing in Virtue’ to ‘Profiting from Injustice’: The Case Against Re-Statification of Investment Dispute Settlement,” Transnational Dispute Management, 4 (2013), available at https://www.transnational-dispute-management.com.Google Scholar
Brown, Brendan F., “Book Review: Legalism by Judith N. Shklar,” University of Toronto Law Journal, 17 (1967), 218–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Mark, “‘An Unqualified Human Good’? On Rule of Law, Globalization, and Imperialism,” Law and Social Inquiry, 43 (2018), 1391–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Nathan J., The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J., Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunner, Emil, Justice and the Social Order, trans. Mary Hottinger (New York: Harper, 1945).Google Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin, In an Abusive State: How Neoliberalism Appropriated the Feminist Movement Against Sexual Violence (Durham: Duke University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Burin, Eric, Slavery and the Peculiar Solution: A History of the American Colonization Society (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2005).Google Scholar
Burin, Frederick, and Shell, Kurt, eds., Politics, Law, and Social Change: Selected Essays of Otto Kirchheimer (New York: Columbia University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Indianapolis: Hackett, [1790] 1987).Google Scholar
Burrow, J. W., Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Butler, Paul, “Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System,” Yale Law Journal, 105 (1995), 677–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calafat, Guillaume, “Jurisdictional Pluralism in a Litigious Sea (1590–1630): Hard Cases, Multi-Sited Trials and Legal Enforcement between North Africa and Italy,” Past and Present, 242 (2019), 142–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C., “National Socialism and Constitutional Law: Carl Schmitt, Otto Koellreutter, and the Debate over the Nature of the Nazi State,” Cardozo Law Review, 16 (1994), 399–427.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C., “Ernst Forsthoff and the Legacy of Radical Conservative State Theory in the Federal Republic of Germany,” History of Political Thought, 15 (1994), 615–641.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C., Popular Sovereignty and the Crisis of German Constitutional Law (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, Peter C., “Ernst Forsthoff in Frankfurt: Political Mobilization and the Abandonment of Scholarly Responsibility,” in Epple, Moritz, Fried, Johannes, Gross, Raphael, and Gudian, Janus, eds., “Politisierung der Wissenschaft”: Jüdische Wissenschaftler und ihre Gegner an der Universität Frankfurt am Main vor und nach 1933 (Frankfurt am Main: Wallstein Verlag, 2014), pp. 249–283.Google Scholar
Call, Charles T., ed., Constructing Justice and Security After War (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Callanan, Keegan, “Liberal Constitutionalism and Political Particularism in Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws,” Political Research Quarterly, 67 (2014), 589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callot, Emile, La philosophie de la vie au XVIIIe siècle (Paris: Éditions Marcel Rivière, 1965).Google Scholar
Cao, Lan, Culture in Law and Development: Nurturing Positive Change (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006).Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, “The Problem of Knowledge,” in idem, ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006), pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, “The Rule of Law Revival,” in idem, ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006), pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, “Democracy Support Strategies: Leading with Women’s Empowerment,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, September 2016.Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, and Carothers, Christopher, “Seeking Political Stability Abroad? Fight Corruption,” National Interest, January 25, 2018.Google Scholar
Carpano, Eric, État de droit et droits européens (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2006).Google Scholar
Carrera, Fernando, “Guatemala’s International Commission Against Impunity: A Case Study of Institutions and Rule of Law,” World Bank, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrese, Paul, Democracy in Moderation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrithers, David W., “Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Punishment,” History of Political Thought, 19 (1998), 213–240.Google Scholar
Cartledge, Paul, Ancient Greek Political Thought in Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartledge, Paul, and Matt, Edge, “‘Rights,’ Individuals, and Communities in Ancient Greece,” in Balot, Ryan K., ed., A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought (Oxford: Blackwell, 2009), pp. 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, Ronald A., “Ignorance of the Law: A Maxim Reexamined,” William and Mary Law Review, 17 (1976), 671–700.Google Scholar
Cassell, Per, Grounds of Judgment: Extraterritoriality and Imperial Power in Nineteenth-Century China and Japan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Antonio, “On the Current Trends Towards Criminal Prosecution and Punishment of Breaches of International Humanitarian Law,” European Journal of International Law, 9 (1998), 2–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, Shane, “Civil Death in the Dominion of Freedom: Liberia and the Logic of Capital,” Law and Critique, 28 (2017), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, Shane, Liberia and the Dialectic of Law: Critical Theory, Pluralism, and the Rule of Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, Shane, “The Mythology of International Rule of Law Promotion,” Law and Social Inquiry, 44 (2019), 957–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, Shane, and Farrall, Jeremy, “Securing the Rule of Law through United Nations Peace Operations,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 18 (2014), 217–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanock, Martin, Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Chapman, Peter, and Payne, Chelsea, “‘You Place the Old Mat with the New Mat’: Legal Empowerment, Equitable Dispute Resolution, and Social Cohesion in Post-Conflict Liberia,” in Open Society Justice Initiative, ed., Justice Initiatives: Legal Empowerment (New York: Open Society Justice Initiative, 2013), pp.15–29.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, and Donald Francis Donovan, “An Introduction: A Just World Under Law,” American Society of International Law Proceedings, 100 (2006), xii–xiii.Google Scholar
Chayes, Sarah, Thieves of State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security (New York: W. W. Norton, 2015).Google Scholar
Cheesman, Nick, Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar’s Courts Make Law and Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, Nick, “Rule of Law Ethnography,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14 (2018), 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Li, Chinese Law in Imperial Eyes: Sovereignty, Justice, and Transcultural Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Chesterman, Simon, 2008, “An International Rule of Law?” American Journal of Comparative Law, 56 (2008), 331–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevallier, Jacques, L’État de droit, 6th ed. (Issy-les-Moulineaux: LGDJ, 2017).Google Scholar
Chibundu, Maxwell, “Law in Development: On Tapping, Grounding and Serving Palm-Wine,” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 29 (1997), 167–261.Google Scholar
Chinese Society of International Law, “The South China Sea Arbitration Awards: A Critical Study,” Chinese Journal of International Law, 17 (2018), 207–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christ, Matthew R., The Litigious Athenian (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Christov, Theodore, Before Anarchy: Hobbes and His Critics in Modern International Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwe, Michael Suk-Young, Rational Ritual: Culture, Coordination, and Common Knowledge (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Ciment, James, Another America: The Story of Liberia and the Former Slaves Who Ruled It (New York: Hill and Wang, 2013).Google Scholar
Melanne A., Civic, “Rule of Law in Multi-dimensional Peacekeeping: Lessons for Reform,” United Nations Peacekeeping, April 2018.Google Scholar
Clendinnen, Inga, “Understanding the Heathen at Home: E. P. Thompson and His School,” Historical Studies, 18 (1979), 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Benjamin Allen, Legalist Empire: International Law and American Foreign Relations in the Early Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, David, Theft in Athenian Law (Munich: C. H. Beck, 1983).Google Scholar
Cohen, David, Law, Violence, and Community in Classical Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Elin, Fandl, Kevin, Perry-Kessaris, Amanda, and Taylor, Veronica, “Truth and Consequences in Rule of Law: Interferences, Attribution and Evaluation,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3 (2011), 106–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coke, Thomas, The Selected Writings and Speeches of Sir Edmund Coke, vol. 1 ed. Sheppard, Steve (Carmel: Liberty Fund, [1600] 2003).Google Scholar
Cole, Daniel H., “‘An Unqualified Human Good’: E. P. Thompson and the Rule of Law,” Journal of Law and Society, 28 (2001), 177–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John, Of Revelation and Revolution, vol. 1: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John, Of Revelation and Revolution, vol. 2: The Dialectics of Modernity on a South African Frontier (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor, Making the Law Work for Everyone, vol. 1: Report of the Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor (New York: Commission on Legal Empowerment of the Poor and United Nations Development Programme, 2008).Google Scholar
Conover, Kellam, Bribery in Classical Athens, Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, 2010.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin, “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns,” in idem, Political Writings, trans. and ed. Fontana, Biancamaria (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 309–328.Google Scholar
Coons, Christian, and Weber, Michael, eds., Paternalism: Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography and Sexual Harassment (New York: Routledge, 1995).Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla, At the Heart of Freedom: Feminism, Sex and Equality (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corten, Olivier, “The Controversies Over the Customary Prohibition on the Use of Force: A Methodological Debate,” European Journal of International Law, 16 (2006), 803–822.Google Scholar
Corten, Olivier, Le droit contre la guerre: l’interdiction du recours à la force en droit international contemporain (Paris: Pedone, 2008).Google Scholar
Cortright, David, Seyle, Conor, and Wall, Kristen, Governance for Peace: How Inclusive, Participatory and Accountable Institutions Promote Peace and Prosperity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, Noel, A History of Islamic Law (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Courtney, C. P., “Montesquieu and Natural Law,” inCarrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A., eds., Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws (Lanham Rowman & Littlefield, 2001), pp. 41–68.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M., “Violence and the Word,” Yale Law Journal, 95 (1986), 1601–1629.Google Scholar
Cowan, Sharon, Kennedy, Chloë, and Munro, Vanessa E., eds., Scottish Feminist Judgments: (Re)Creating Law from the Outside In (Oxford: Hart, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Iris, Montesquieu and the History of French Laws (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1983).Google Scholar
Craig, Paul, “Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework,” Public Law (1997), pp. 467–487.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian, A Virtue for Courageous Minds. Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Craven, Matthew, Pahuja, Sundhya, and Simpson, Gerry, “Reading and Unreading a Historiography of Hiatus,” in idem, eds., International Law and the Cold War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), pp. 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, James, “International Law and the Rule of Law,” Adelaide Law Review, 24 (2003), 3–12.Google Scholar
Crawford, James, “The Current Political Discourse Concerning International Law,” Modern Law Review, 81 (2018), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé, Neil Gotanda, Gary Peller, and Kendall Thomas, “Introduction,” in idem, eds., Critical Race Theory, pp. xiii–xxxii.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams, “The First Decade: Critical Reflections, or ‘A Foot in the Closing Door,’” University of California Los Angeles Law Review, 49 (2002), 1343–1372.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé and Peller, Gary, “Reel Time/Real Justice,” Denver University Law Review, 70 (1993), 283–296.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberlé, Gotanda, Neil, Peller, Gary, and Thomas, Kendall, eds., Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings That Formed the Movement (New York: The New Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan, The Constitutionalist Revolution: An Essay on the History of England, 1450–1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromwell, Oliver, The Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell, with Elucidations by Thomas Carlyle, vol. 2, ed. S. C. Lomas (London: Methuen, 1904).Google Scholar
Cromwell, Oliver, The Letters and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell, with Elucidations by Thomas Carlyle, vol. 3, ed. S. C. Lomas (London: Methuen, 1904).Google Scholar
Cromwell, Oliver, The Writings and Speeches of Oliver Cromwell, vol. 4: The Protectorate 1655–1658, ed. Abbott, Wilbur Cortez (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1947).Google Scholar
Villalón, Cruz, Pedro, “Das Grundgesetz im internationalen Wirkungszusammenhang der Verfassungen: Bericht Spanien,” in Battis, Ulrich, Mahrenholz, Ernst Gottfried, and Tsatsos, Dimitris, eds., Das Grundgesetz im internationalen Wirkungszusammenhang der Verfassungen: 40 Jahre Grundgesetz (Berlin: Duncker und Humblot, 1990), pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
Cupit, Geoffrey, Justice as Fittingness (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff, and Montal, Florencia, “Unintended Positive Complementarity: Why ICC Investigations May Increase Domestic Human Rights Prosecutions,” American Journal of International Law, 111 (2017), 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darley, John M., Carlsmith, Kevin M., and Robinson, Paul H., “The Ex Ante Function of the Criminal Law,” Law and Society Review, 35 (2001), 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, John Seh, The American Colonization Society and the Founding of the First African Republic (Bloomington: iUniverse, 2014).Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret, “Law’s Truths and the Truth about Law: Interdisciplinary Refractions,” in Davies, Margaret and Munro, Vanessa E., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 65–81.Google Scholar
Davies, Margaret, and Munro, Vanessa E., “Editors’ Introduction,” in Davies, Margaret and Munro, Vanessa E., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp, Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., “What Can the Rule of Law Variable Tell Us About Rule of Law Reforms?” Michigan Journal of International Law, 26 (2004), 141–161.Google Scholar
Davis, Kevin E., “Legal Indicators: The Power of Quantitative Measures of Law,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10 (2014), 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawkins, Richard, The Selfish Gene, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien, “Aristocratic Liberalism in Post-Revolutionary France,” Historical Journal, 48 (2005), 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien, “Montesquieu’s Controversial Context: The Spirit of the Laws as a Monarchist Tract,” History of Political Thought, 34 (2013), 66–88.Google Scholar
Denzau, Arthur T., and North, Douglass C., “Shared Mental Models: Ideologies and Institutions,” Kyklos, 47 (1994), 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, “Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority,” in Cornell, Drucilla, Rosenfeld, Michael, and Carlson, David Gray, eds., Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice (New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 3–67.Google Scholar
de Soto, Hernando, The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else (New York: Basic Books, 2000).Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G., Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Plattner, Marc F., and Walker, Christopher, eds., Authoritarianism Goes Global: The Challenge to Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., The Privy Council: The Arnold Prize Essay, 1860 (Oxford: T. & G. Shrimpton, 1860).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “The Development of the Common Law,” Macmillan’s Magazine, 24 (1871), 287–296.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “Stubbs’s Constitutional History of England,” Nation, 20 (1875), 152–154.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “Digby on History of English Law,” Nation, 21 (1875), 373–374.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “How Is the Law to be Enforced in Ireland?” Fortnightly Review, 30 (1881), 537–552.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution (London: Macmillan, 1885).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., A Digest of the Law of England with reference to the Conflict of Laws (London: Stevens & Son, 1896).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “Droit Administratif in Modern French Law,” Law Quarterly Review, 17 (1901), 302–318.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth Century (London: Macmillan, 1905).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “Woman Suffrage,” Quarterly Review, 210 (1909), 276–304.Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1915).Google Scholar
Dicey, A. V., “The Development of Administrative Law in England,” Law Quarterly Review, (1915), 31. TBCGoogle Scholar
Dicey, A. V., Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 8th ed. (London: Macmillan, 1915).Google Scholar
Dick, Shelly, “FMO Country Guide: Liberia,” Refugee Studies Centre, 2003.Google Scholar
Dickson, Tiphaine, “Shklar’s Legalism and the Liberal Paradox,” Constellations, 22 (2015), 188–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, James M., Juries and the Transformation of Criminal Justice in France in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Heather, Bartlett, Francesca, Luker, Trish, and Hunter, Rosemary, eds., Australian Feminist Judgments: Righting and Rewriting Law (Oxford: Hart, 2014).Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin, “Montesquieu and Modern Republicanism,” Political Studies, 60 (2012), 703–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Michael W., Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997).Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B., The Souls of Black Folk, ed. Edwards, Brent Hayes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1903] 2007).Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B., “Liberia, the League and the United States,” Foreign Affairs, 11 (1933), 682–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubber, Markus D., and Hörnle, Tatjana, Criminal Law: A Comparative Approach (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Duff, Antony, and Hoskins, Zachary, “Legal Punishment,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/legal-punishment/.Google Scholar
Dupret, Baudoin, ed., Standing Trial: Law and the Person in the Modern Middle East (London, I. B. Tauris, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durch, William J., and Ker, Michelle, “Police in UN Peacekeeping: Improving Selection, Recruitment, and Deployment,” International Peace Institute, New York, November 2013.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Gerald, “Moral Paternalism,” Law and Philosophy, 24 (2005), 305–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, “Political Judges and the Rule of Law,” Proceedings of the British Academy, 64 (1978), 259–287.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, A Matter of Principle (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Law’s Empire (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Justice in Robes (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, “The Politics of Deference: Judicial Review and Democracy,” in Taggart, Michael, ed., The Province of Administrative Law (Oxford: Hart, 1997), pp. 279–307.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, “Form and Substance in the Rule of Law: A Democratic Justification for Judicial Review,” in Forsyth, Christopher, ed., Judicial Review and the Constitution (Oxford: Hart, 2000), pp. 141–167.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, “The Left and the Question of Law”, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence, 17 (2004), 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, “How Hobbes met the ‘Hobbes Challenge,’” Modern Law Review, 72 (2009), 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, “Hobbes on the Authority of Law”, in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, eds., Hobbes and the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 186–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David, “Dreaming the Rule of Law,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, eds., Law, Liberty and State: Oakeshot, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 234–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dziedzic, Michael, ed., Criminalized Power Structures: The Overlooked Enemies of Peace (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016).Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Pia, and Olivet, Cecilia, Profiting from Injustice: How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom (Amsterdam: Corporate Europe Observatory and the Transnational Institute, 2012).Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan, Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Wheatley, Natasha, eds., Power and Time: Temporalities in Conflict and the Making of History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Efstathiou, Christos, E. P. Thompson: A Twentieth-Century Romantic (London: Merlin Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Ehrard, Jean, Politique de Montesquieu (Paris: Armand Colin, 1965).Google Scholar
Eliade, Mircea, The Myth of the Eternal Return: Cosmos and History (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965).Google Scholar
Elon, Amos, The Pity of It All: A History of Jews in Germany, 1743–1933 (New York: Henry Holt, 2002).Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, ed., Deliberative Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enright, Máiréad M., McCandless, Julie, and O’Donoghue, Aoife, eds., Northern/Irish Feminist Judgments: Judges’ Troubles and the Gendered Politics of Identity (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar
Ensley, Michael J., and Munger, Michael C., “Ideological Competition and Institutions: Why ‘Cultural’ Explanations of Development Patterns Are Not Nonsense,” in Mudambi, Ram, Navarra, Pietro, and Sobbrio, Giuseppe, eds., Rules and Reason: Perspectives on Constitutional Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errera, Roger, “Dicey and French Administrative Law,” Public Law (1985), pp. 695–709.Google Scholar
Eslava, Luis, and Pahuja, Sundhya, “The Nation-State and International Law: A Reading from the Global South,” Humanity, 11 (2020), 118–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faber, Karl-Georg, “Macht, Gewalt: Liberale Lehre von der Staatsgewalt,” in Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds., Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Studienausgabe), vol. 3 (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2004), pp. 817–935.Google Scholar
Faguet, Emile, La politique comparée de Montesquieu, Rousseau et Voltaire (Paris: Société Française d’Imprimérie et de Librairie, 1902).Google Scholar
Fallon, Richard H. Jr., “‘The Rule of Law’ as a Concept in Constitutional Discourse,” Columbia Law Review, 97 (1997), 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farley, Anthony Paul, “Accumulation,” Michigan Journal of Race and Law, 11 (2005), 51–73.Google Scholar
Farmer, Lindsay, Making the Modern Criminal Law: Criminalization and Civil Order (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassin, Didier, Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing, trans. Rachel Gomme (Cambridge: Polity 2013).Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel, “Legal Paternalism,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 1 (1971), 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felman, Shoshona, The Juridical Unconscious: Trials and Traumas in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Feuerbach, Anselm von, Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden Peinlichen Rechts (Giessen: Georg Friedrich Heyer, 1801)Google Scholar
Fine, Michelle, and Weis, Lois, “Disappearing Acts: The State and Violence against Women in the Twentieth Century,” Signs, 25 (2000), 1139–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Bob, Democracy and the Rule of Law: Liberal Ideals and Marxist Critiques (London: Pluto Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Fine, Robert, “The Rule of Law and Muggletonian Marxism: The Perplexities of Edward Thompson,” Journal of Law and Society, 21 (1994), 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fineman, Martha L., “Challenging Law, Establishing Difference: The Future of Feminist Legal Scholarship,” Florida Law Review, 42 (1990), 25–43.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, “The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition,” Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, 20 (2008), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha Albertson, “The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State,” Emory Law Journal, 60 (2010), pp. 251–275.Google Scholar
Finley, Lucinda M., “Breaking Women’s Silence in Law: The Dilemma of the Gendered Nature of Legal Reasoning,” Notre Dame Law Review, 64 (1989), 886–910.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Finnis, John M., “Law as Co-ordination,” Ratio Juris, 2 (1989), 97–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M., “Death of the Law?,” Cornell Law Review, 72 (1986), 1–16.Google Scholar
Fiss, Owen M., The Irony of Free Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, Peter, The Mythology of Modern Law (London: Routledge, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flagg, Barbara J., “‘Was Blind But Now I See’: White Race Consciousness and the Requirement of Discriminatory Intent,” Michigan Law Review, 91 (1993), 953–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flewers, Paul, and McIlroy, John, eds., 1956: John Saville, E. P. Thompson and The Reasoner (London: Merlin Press, 2016).Google Scholar
Flogaïtis, Spyridon, Administrative law et droit administratif (Paris: R. Pichon et R. Durand-Auzias, 1986).Google Scholar
Ford, Franklin, Robe and Sword: The Regrouping of the French Aristocracy after Louis XIV (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Ford, Lisa, Settler Sovereignty: Jurisdiction and Indigenous People in America and Australia, 1788–1836 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ford, “Ethnic Relations and the Transformation of Leadership among the Dan of Nimba, Liberia (ca. 1900–1940),” Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York, 1990.Google Scholar
Ford, Stuart, “A Social Psychology Model of the Perceived Legitimacy of International Criminal Courts: Implications for the Success of Transitional Justice Mechanisms,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 45 (2014), 405–476.Google Scholar
Forrester, Katrina, In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019).Google Scholar
Forsdyke, Sara, “Ancient and Modern Conceptions of the Rule of Law,” in Mirko Canevaro, Andrew Erskine, Benjamin Gray, and Josiah Ober, eds., Ancient Greek History and Contemporary Social Science (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018), pp. 184–212.Google Scholar
Forsthoff, Ernst, “Führung und Bürokratie: Einige grundsätzliche Erwägungen,” Deutsches Adelsblatt, 53 (1935), 1339–1340.Google Scholar
Forsthoff, Ernst, ed., Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Sozialstaatlichkeit (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1968).Google Scholar
Fortescue, John, De Laudibus Legum Anglie, trans. and ed. S. B. Chrimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1949 [1471]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan Sheridan (Harmondsworth: Penguin, [1975] 1977).Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst, The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship, trans. E. A. Shils, with an Introduction by Jens Meierhenrich (Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1941] 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2014: Methodology, November 2014.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry, “Taking Law Seriously” Perspectives on Politics, 4 (2006), 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromont, Michel, “Les mythes du droit public français: séparation des pouvoirs et État de droit,” in Charlot, Patrick, ed., Utopies: Études en hommages à Claude Courvoisier (Dijon: Éditions universitaires, 2005), pp. 293–302.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, “Transitions to the Rule of Law,” Journal of Democracy, 21 (2010), 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Reason and Fiat in Case Law,” Harvard Law Review, 59 (1946), 376–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “American Legal Philosophy at Mid-Century: A Review of Edwin W. Patterson’s Jurisprudence, Men and Ideas of the Law,” Journal of Legal Education, 6 (1954), 457–485.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Human Purpose and Natural Law,” Journal of Philosophy, 53 (1956), 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Positivism and Fidelity to Law – A Reply to Professor Hart,” Harvard Law Review, 71 (1958), 630–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “Reply to Professors Cohen and Dworkin,” Villanova Law Review, 10 (1965), 655–666.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L, The Morality of Law, 2nd rev. ed. (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L., “The Forms and Limits of Adjudication,” Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978), 353–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Timothy, “Friedrich Hayek’s Moral Science,” Ratio Juris, 2 (1989), 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funk, David A., “Traditional Islamic Jurisprudence: Justifying Islamic Law and Government,” Southern University Law Review, 20 (1993), 213–294.Google Scholar
Gabel, Peter, et al., “Critical Legal Studies Symposium,” Stanford Law Review, 36 (1984), 1–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagarin, Michael, “Law, Politics, and the Question of Relevance in the Case on the Crown,” Classical Antiquity, 31 (2012), 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallie, W. B., “Essentially Contested Concepts,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56 (1956), 167–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, Ruben J., “Critical Race Theory and Proposition 187: The Racial Politics of Immigration Law,” Chicano-Latino Law Review, 17 (1995), 118–148.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen, The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto, “The Majoritarian Reading of the Rule of Law,” in Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam, eds., Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gargarella, Roberto, “‘We the People’ Outside of the Constitution: The Dialogic Model of Constitutionalism and the System of Checks and Balances,” Current Legal Problems, 67 (2014), 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David, The Culture of Control Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo, “Good Governance as a Counter-Insurgency Agenda to Oppositional and Transformative Social Projects in International Law,” Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 5 (1999), 107–174.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture,” in idem, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York: Basic Books, 1973), pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, The Contribution and Role of SSR in the Prevention of Violent Conflict (Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2017).Google Scholar
Gennaioli, Nicola, and Shleifer, Andrei, “The Evolution of Common Law,” Journal of Political Economy, 115 (2007), 43–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gennaioli, Nicola, and Shleifer, Andrei, “Overruling and the Instability of Law,” Journal of Comparative Economics, 35 (2007), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerring, John, Case Study Research, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Gershoni, Yekutiel, “Liberia’s Unification Policy and Decolonization in Africa: A Parallel Process,” Asian and African Studies, 16 (1982), 239–260.Google Scholar
Gershoni, Yekutiel, “The Formation of Liberia’s Boundaries, Part 1: Agreements,” Liberian Studies Journal, 17 (1992), 25–45.Google Scholar
Ghai, Yash, and Cottrell, Jill, eds., Marginalized Communities and Access to Justice (New York: Routledge, 2010).Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen, and Claire Cutler, A., eds., New Constitutionalism and World Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, “Does Law Matter for Economic Development?” Law and Society Review, 34 (2000), 829–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, “Constitutional Afterlife: The Continuing Impact of Thailand’s Postpolitical Constitution,” International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7 (2009), 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, “Pitfalls of Measuring the Rule of Law,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3 (2011), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir, “Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Politics,” in Moustafa, Tamir and Ginsburg, Tom, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008), pp. 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Versteeg, Mila, “Measuring the Rule of Law: A Comparison of Indicators,” Law and Social Inquiry, 42 (2016), 100–137.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Versteeg, Mila, “Constitutional Correlates of the Rule of Law,” in Adams, Maurice and Meuwese, Anne, eds., Constitutionalism and Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 506–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, Stefan, “Nullem Crimen Sine Lege,” Journal of Comparative Legislation and International Law, 24 (1942), 29–37.Google Scholar
Glendon, Mary Ann, Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse (New York: The Free Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf, Verwaltung–Justiz–Rechtsweg: Staatsverwaltung und Selbstverwaltung nach englischen und deutschen Verhältnissen mit besonderer Rücksicht auf Verwaltungsformen und Kreis-Ordnungen in Preußen (Berlin: Springer, 1869).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gneist, Rudolf, Der Rechtsstaat und die Verwaltungsgerichte in Deutschland, 2nd ed. (Berlin: Springer, 1879).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., The Terror Presidency: Law and Judgment Inside the Bush Administration (New York: W. W. Norton, 2007).Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack, “The Contributions of the Obama Administration to the Practice and Theory of International Law,” Harvard International Law Journal, 57 (2016), 455–473.Google Scholar
Golub, Stephen, “Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, October 2003.Google Scholar
Golub, Stephen, “The Legal Empowerment Alternative,” in Thomas Carothers, ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006), pp. 161–187.Google Scholar
Golub, Stephen, ed., Legal Empowerment: Practitioners’ Perspectives (Rome: International Development Law Organization, 2010).Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E., “Institutions and Their Design,” in idem, ed., The Theory of Institutional Design (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 26–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, Peter, Languages of Law: From Logics of Memory to Nomadic Masks (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Goodwin, Laura, and Maru, Vivek, “What Do We Know about Legal Empowerment? Mapping the Evidence,” Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 9 (2017), 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Adam, A Thousand Small Sanities: The Moral Adventure of Liberalism (New York: Basic Books, 2019).Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W., “E. P. Thompson’s Legacies,” Georgetown Law Journal, 82 (1994), 2005–2011.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W., “The Role of Lawyers in Producing the Rule of Law: Some Critical Reflections,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 11 (2010), 441–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowder, Paul, The Rule of Law in the Real World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone, La philosophie du droit de Montesquieu (Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck, 1973).Google Scholar
Gozzi, Gustavo, “Rechtsstaat and Individual Rights in German Constitutional History,” in Costa, Pietro and Zolo, Danilo, eds., The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007), pp. 237–259.Google Scholar
Gray, John, “Political Power, Social Theory, and Essential Contestability,” in Miller, David and Siedentop, Larry, eds., The Nature of Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), 75–101.Google Scholar
Green, Jonathan Allen, “Edmund Burke’s German Readers at the End of Enlightenment, 1790–1815,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2017.Google Scholar
Green, Leslie, “Law’s Rule,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 24 (1986), 1023–1042.Google Scholar
Greenman, Kathryn, “Aliens in Latin America: Intervention, Arbitration and State Responsibility for Rebels,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 31 (2018), 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greer, Allan, Property and Dispossession: Natives, Empires and Land in Early Modern North America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, Avner, and Laitin, David D., “A Theory of Endogenous Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, 98 (2004), 633–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grewal, David Singh, and Purdy, Jedediah, “The Original Theory of Constitutionalism,” Yale Law Journal, 127 (2018), 664–705.Google Scholar
Grewe, Constance, “Das deutsche Grundgesetz aus französischer Sicht,” Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, 58 (2010), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, J. A. G., “The Political Constitution,” Modern Law Review, 42 (1979), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Dieter, Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte 1776–1866 (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988).Google Scholar
Grosrichard, Alain, Structure du sérail: La fiction du despotisme asiatique dans l’occident classique (Paris: Éditions du seuil, 1979).Google Scholar
Gross, Raphael, Carl Schmitt and the Jews, trans. Joel Golb (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2007).Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew T., “Against Consent,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 52 (2012), 747–790.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Zum Begriff der politischen Beteiligung,” in Jürgen Habermas, Ludwig Friedeburg, Christoph von Oehler, and Friedrich Weltz, , eds., Student und Politik (Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1961), pp. 13–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. Thomas Burger (Cambridge: MIT Press, [1962] 1989).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Rehg (Cambridge: MIT Press, [1992] 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Natural Law and Revolution,” in idem, Theory and Practice, trans. Viertel, John (Boston: Beacon Press, [1963] 1974), pp. 82–120.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2, trans. Thomas McCarthy (Boston: Beacon Press, [1985] 1987).Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “Law and Morality,” in McMurrin, Sterling M., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988), pp. 219–279.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen, “On the Internal Relation between Rule of Law and Democracy,” European Journal of Philosophy, 3 (1995), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., Rules for a Flat World: Why Humans Invented Law and How to Reinvent It for a Complex Global Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., and Heine, Jamie, “Law in the Law-Thick World: The Legal Resource Landscape for Ordinary Americans,” in Estreicher, Samuel and Radice, Joy, eds., Beyond Elite Law: Access to Civil Justice for Ordinary Americans (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 21–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., and Weingast, Barry R., “What Is Law? A Coordination Model of the Characteristics of Legal Order,” Journal of Legal Analysis, 4 (2012), 471–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., and Weingast, Barry R., “Law without the State: Legal Attributes and the Coordination of Decentralized Collective Punishment,” Journal of Law and Courts, 1 (2013), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K., and Weingast, Barry R., “Microfoundations of the Rule of Law,” Annual Review of Political Science, 17 (2014), 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Tiede, Lydia, “The Rule of Law and Economic Growth: Where are We?” World Development, 39 (2011), 673–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, MacIntyre, Andrew, and Tiede, Lydia, “The Rule of Law and Economic Development,” Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (2008), 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hailsham, Lord, Elective Dictatorship (London: BBC, 1976).Google Scholar
Hall, Jerome, General Principles of Criminal Law, 2nd ed. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960).Google Scholar
Hall, Livingston, and Seligman, Selig J., “Mistake of Law and Mens Rea,” University of Chicago Law Review, 8 (1941), 641–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David, eds., Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallaq, Wael, A History of Islamic Legal Theories (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Hamilton, Scott, The Crisis of Theory: E. P. Thompson, the New Left, and Postwar British Politics (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammergren, Linn A., Justice Reform and Development: Rethinking Donor Assistance to Developing and Transition Countries (New York: Routledge, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamson, C. J., Executive Discretion and Judicial Control: An Aspect of the French Conseil d’État (London: Stevens & Sons, 1954).Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens Herman, The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard E., “Beccaria’s On Crimes and Punishments: A Mirror on the History of the Foundations of the Modern Criminal Law,” in Dubber, Markus D., Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), pp. 39–60.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell, “Law and Social Order,” Philosophical Issues, 11 (2010), 61–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, Hargreaves, Shaun, P., and Varoufakis, Yanis, Game Theory: A Critical Introduction, 2nd ed. (London: Routledge, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, James, The Common-Wealth of Oceana (London: J. Streater, 1656).Google Scholar
Harris, Edward, The Rule of Law in Action in Democratic Athens (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,” Harvard Law Review, 71 (1958), 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Book Review: The Morality of Law by Lon L. Fuller,” Harvard Law Review, 78 (1965), 1281–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Prolegomenon to the Philosophy of Punishment,” in idem, Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., “Beccaria and Bentham,” in idem, Essays on Bentham: Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982), pp. 40–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr., and Sacks, Albert M., The Legal Process: Basic Problems in the Making and Application of Law, eds. Eskridge, William N., Jr., and Frickey, Philip P. (Westbury: Foundation Press 1994).Google Scholar
Harvey, W. Burnett, “The Rule of Law in Historical Perspective,” Michigan Law Review, 59 (1961), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatzis, Aristides N., “The Illiberal Democracy of Ancient Athens,” Unpublished paper, University of Athens, July 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice, Précis de droit administratif et droit public, 8th ed. (Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1914).Google Scholar
Hauriou, Maurice, La jurisprudence administrative de 1892 à 1929, vol. 1 (Paris: Recueil Sirey, 1929).Google Scholar
Haverkate, Georg, “Staat und Soveränität: Rechtsstaat,” in Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds., Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Studienausgabe), vol. 6 (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2004), pp. 1–154.Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas, “Moral Economy, Political Economy, and Law,” in Randall, Adrian and Charlesworth, Andrew, eds., Moral Economy and Popular Protest: Crowds, Conflict and Authority (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999), pp. 93–122.Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas, “The State and the Market: Lord Kenyon and Mr Waddington,” Past and Present, 162 (1999), 101–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Douglas, and Rogers, Nicholas, Eighteenth-Century English Society: Shuttles and Swords (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hay, Douglas, Peter Linebaugh, John G. Rule, E. P. Thompson, and Cal Winslow, Albion’s Fatal Tree: Crime and Society in Eighteenth-Century England, 2nd ed. (London: Verso, 2011).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., “The Economic Conditions of Interstate Federalism,” in idem, Individualism and Economic Order (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1939] 1948), pp. 255–273.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., The Road to Serfdom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1944] 2007).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., “Decline of the Rule of Law, Part 1,” The Freeman, April 20, 1953.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., “Decline of the Rule of Law, Part 2,” The Freeman, May 4, 1953.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek, vol. 17: The Constitution of Liberty, ed. Hamowy, Ronald (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, [1960] 2011).Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A., Law, Legislation and Liberty, 3 vols. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973–1979).Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla B., Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Hearn, William Edward, The Government of England: Its Structure and Its Development (London: Longmans, Green, Reader, & Dyer, 1867).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. H. B. Nisbet, ed. Allen W. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1820] 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R., “Nonconsensual International Lawmaking,” University of Illinois Law Review, 2008 (2008), 71–125.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn, Everyday Law in Russia (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2017).Google Scholar
Heritage Foundation, Property Rights, November 2014, available at www.heritage.org/index/property-rights.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, État de droit, Rechtsstaat, Rule of Law (Paris: Dalloz, 2002).Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, “Book Review: Eine deutsch-französische Rechtswissenschaft? Une science juridique franco-allemande? by Olivier Beaud and Erk Volkmar Heyen,” Revue internationale de droit compare, 55 (2003), 995–1000.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, “État de droit,” in Cadiet, Loïc, ed., Dictionnaire de la Justice (Paris: PUF, 2004), pp. 455–461.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, “Why Should Judges Be Independent? Reflections on Coke, Montesquieu and the French Tradition of Judicial Dependence,” in Ziegler, Katja, Baranger, Denis, and Bradley, Anthony, eds., Constitutionalism and the Role of Parliaments (Oxford: Hart, 2007), pp. 199–223.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, “État de droit: Étude de linguistique, de théorie et de dogmatique juridiques comparées,” in Bauer, Hartmut and Calliess, Christian, eds., Verfassungsprinzipien in Europa – Constitutional Principles in Europe – Principes constitutionnels en Europe (Athens/Berlin/Brussels: Sakkoulas/Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag/Bruylant, 2008), pp. 103–155.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, “Le regard d’un comparatiste: L’État de droit dans et au-delà des cultures juridiques nationales,” in Société française de droit international, ed., L’État de droit en droit international (Paris: Pédone, 2009), pp. 41–67.Google Scholar
Heuschling, Luc, “État de droit,” in Auby, Jean-Bernard, ed., L’influence du droit européen sur les catégories juridiques du droit public français (Paris: Dalloz, 2010), pp. 541–552.Google Scholar
Hewart, Lord, The New Despotism (London: Ernest Benn, 1929).Google Scholar
Hickel, Jason, The Division (London: William Heinemann, 2017).Google Scholar
Higgins, Rosalyn, “The Rule of Law: Some Sceptical Thoughts,” in idem, Themes and Theories: Selected Essays, Speeches and Writings in International Law, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), pp. 1330–1339.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa, Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Mireille, “Radbruch’s Rechtsstaat and Schmitt’s Legal Order: Legalism, Legality, and the Institution of Law,” Critical Analysis of Law, 2 (2015), 42–63.Google Scholar
Hill, George Norman, Birkbeck, and Powell, L. F., eds., Boswell’s Life of Johnson, vol. 1: The Life (1709–1765) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1934).Google Scholar
Hinton, Alexander Laban, The Justice Facade: Trials of Transition in Cambodia (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Philipp-Alexander, Freiheit und Staatlichkeit bei Kant: Die autonomietheoretische Begründung von Recht und Staat und das Widerstandsproblem (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran, Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Hitz, Zena, “Plato on the Sovereignty of Law,” in Balot, Ryan K., ed., A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought (Oxford: Blackwell, 2009), pp. 367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Tuck, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1652] 1997).Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, A Dialogue Between a Philosopher and a Student, of the Common Laws of England, in idem, The Clarendon Edition of the Works of Thomas Hobbes, vol 11: Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, eds. Cromartie, Alan and Skinner, Quentin (Oxford: Clarendon Press, [1681] 2005), pp. 1–146.Google Scholar
Hodge, Joseph, “Writing the History of Development, Part 1: The First Wave,” Humanity, 6 (2015), 429–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Joseph, “Writing the History of Development, Part 2: Longer, Deeper, Wider,” Humanity, 7 (2016), 125–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodson, Loveday, and Lavers, Troy, eds., Feminist Judgments in International Law (Oxford: Hart, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Peter W., and Bushell, Allison A., “The Charter Dialogue Between Courts and Legislatures,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 35 (1997), 75–124.Google Scholar
Hogg, Peter W., Bushell Thornton, Allison A., and Wright, Wade K., “Charter Dialogue Revisited – Or Much Ado About Metaphors,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 45 (2007), 1–65.Google Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell Jr., The Common Law, introd. G. Edward White (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, [1881] 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, Benjamin Constant and the Making of Modern Liberalism (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen, “Lineages of the Rule of Law,” in Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam, eds., Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 19–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, Wythe, “Tilt,” George Washington Law Review, 52 (1983), 280–288.Google Scholar
Horder, Jeremy, Ashworth’s Principles of Criminal Law, 8th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörnle, Tatjana, “PJA von Feuerbach and his Textbook of the Common Penal Law,” in Dubber, Markus D., ed., Foundational Texts in Criminal Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014) pp. 119–140.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Morton J., “The Rule of Law: An Unqualified Human Good?,” Yale Law Journal, 86 (1977), 561–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Isabel V., A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, Isabel, “Anything Can Be Rescinded,” London Review of Books, April 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark, Montesquieu and the Old Regime (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulsebosch, Daniel, Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, “Pressure Point: The ICC’s Impact on National Justice,” May 2018.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch, “Guatemala: President Sabotages Fight for Justice,” August 2018.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Stephen, Theatre of the Rule of Law: Transnational Legal Intervention in Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, Stephen, “The Rule of Law as Morality Play,” Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 23 (2012–2013), 3–44.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Stephen, “Conscience in the Datasphere,” Humanity, 6 (2015), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian, Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary, “Contesting the Dominant Paradigm: Feminist Critiques of Liberal Legalism,” in Davies, Margaret and Munro, Vanessa E., eds., The Ashgate Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013), pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Hunter, Rosemary, McGlynn, Clare, and Rackley, Erika, eds., Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar
Husak, Douglas N., “Paternalism and Autonomy,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10 (1981), 27–46.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C., “The Importance of Not Being Ernest,” McGill Law Journal, 34 (1989), 234–263.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C., and Monahan, Patrick, “Introduction,” in idem, eds., The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology? (Toronto: Carswell, 1987), pp. iv–xiv.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Allan C., and Monahan, Patrick, “Democracy and the Rule of Law,” in idem, eds., The Rule of Law: Ideal or Ideology? (Toronto: Carswell, 1987), pp. 97–123.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. L., “Critical Race Histories: In and Out,” American University Law Review, 53 (2004), 1187–1215.Google Scholar
Iglesias, Elizabeth M., “LatCrit Theory: Some Preliminary Notes Towards a Transatlantic Dialogue,” University of Miami International and Comparative Law Review, 9 (2001), 1–32.Google Scholar
Ingrao, Charles, “The Problem of ‘Enlightened Absolutism’ and the German States,” Journal of Modern History, 58 (1986), S161–S180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Commission of Enquiry, “The 1930 Enquiry Commission to Liberia,” Journal of the Royal African Society, 30 (1931), 277–290.Google Scholar
Ireland, Paddy, “History, Critical Legal Studies, and the Mysterious Disappearance of Capitalism,” Modern Law Review, 65 (2002), 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Is Democracy Dying? A Global Report,” Foreign Affairs, 97 (2018), 10–56.Google Scholar
Isser, Deborah H., ed., Customary Justice and the Rule of Law in War-Torn Societies (Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Isser, Deborah H., C. Lubkemann, Stephen, and N’Tow, Saah, Looking for Justice: Liberian Experiences with and Perceptions of Local Justice Options (Washington: United States Institute of Peace, 2009).Google Scholar
Jackson, Paul, “Introduction: Second Generation Security Sector Reform,” Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 12 (2018), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, R. M., The Machinery of Justice in England, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1964] 2015).Google Scholar
James of Viterbo, “Is It Better to Be Ruled by the Best Man than by the Best Laws?,” in McGrade, Arthur Stephen, Kilcullen, John, and Kempshall, Matthew, eds., The Cambridge Translations of Medieval Philosophical Texts, vol. 2: Ethics and Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1295–1296] 2001), 321–325.Google Scholar
Jellinek, Georg, Allgemeine Staatslehre, 3rd ed. (Berlin: Springer, 1921).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor, Local Government in the Modern Constitution (London: University of London Press, 1931).Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor, The Law and the Constitution (London: University of London Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Jennings, W. Ivor, “Courts and Administrative Law: The Experience of English Housing Legislation,” Harvard Law Review, 49 (1936), 426–454.Google Scholar
Jensen, Erik G., “Postscript: An Immodest Reflection,” in Marshall, David, ed., The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014), pp. 295–303.Google Scholar
Jensen, Erik, and Heller, Thomas, eds., Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to the Rule of Law (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Jeong, May, “The Impossible Job of Afghanistan’s Attorney General,” The Atlantic, March 9, 2017.Google Scholar
Jestaedt, Matthias, Lepsius, Oliver, Möllers, Christoph, and Schönberger, Christoph, The German Federal Constitutional Court: The Court without Limits, trans. Jeff Seitzer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jhering, Rudolph von, The Struggle for Law, trans. John J. Lalor, 5th ed. (Chicago: Callaghan, 1879).Google Scholar
Johansen, Baber, “Sacred and Religious Element in Hanafite Law – Function and Limits of the Absolute Character of Government Authority,” in Gellner, Ernest and Jean-Claude Vatin, eds., Islam et politique au Maghreb (Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1981), pp. 281–303.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Steven, Disputes and Democracy: The Consequences of Litigation in Ancient Athens (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Jones, Harry W., “The Rule of Law and the Welfare State,” Columbia Law Review, 58 (1958), 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jouanjan, Olivier, ed., Figures de l’État de droit: Le Rechtsstaat dans l’histoire intellectuelle et constitutionnelle de l’Allemagne (Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg, 2001).Google Scholar
Jouanjan, Olivier, “État de droit,” in Alland, Denis and Rials, Stéphane, eds., Dictionnaire de la culture juridique (Paris: PUF, 2003), pp. 649–653.Google Scholar
Jouanjan, Olivier, “Le Conseil constitutionnel est-il une institution libérale?,” Droits, 43 (2006), 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jowell, Jeffrey, “The Rule of Law and Its Underlying Values,” in Jowell, Jeffrey and Oliver, Dawn, eds., The Changing Constitution, 7th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert, Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order (Atlantic: Atlantic, 2003).Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., The Cultural Study of Law: Reconstructing Legal Scholarship (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Kahn, Paul W., “American Exceptionalism, Popular Sovereignty, and the Rule of Law,” in Ignatieff, Michael, ed., American Exceptionalism and Human Rights (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005), pp. 198–222.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas, and Katznelson, Ira, Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamenka, Eugene, and Alice Erh-Soon Tay, , “Beyond Bourgeois Individualism – The Contemporary Crisis in Law and Legal Ideology,” in Kamenka, Eugene and Neale, R. S., eds., Feudalism, Capitalism and Beyond (Canberra: ANU Press, 1975), pp. 126–144.Google Scholar
Kammerhofer, Jörg, “Introduction: The Future of Restrictive Scholarship on the Use of Force,” Leiden Journal of International Law, 29 (2016), 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Werkausgabe, vol. 8: Die Metaphysik der Sitten, ed. Weischedel, Wilhelm (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, [1797] 1977).Google Scholar
Kassem, Badreddine, Décadence et absolutisme dans l’oeuvre de Montesquieu (Paris: Librairie Minard, 1960).Google Scholar
Kattan, Victor, “Furthering the ‘War on Terrorism’ through International Law: How the United States and the United Kingdom Resurrected the Bush Doctrine on Using Preventive Military Force to Combat Terrorism,” Journal on the Use of Force and International Law, 5 (2018), 97–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart, and Mastruzzi, Massimo, “The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues,” Policy Research Working Paper 5430, Development Research Group, World Bank, September 2010.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Katharina, “Conflict in Political Liberalism: Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear,” Res Publica, 26 (2020), 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayaoglu, Turan, Legal Imperialism: Sovereignty and Extraterritoriality in Japan, the Ottoman Empire, and China (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Kaye, Harvey J., The British Marxist Historians (London: Macmillan, [1984] 1995).Google Scholar
Kaye, Harvey J., and McClelland, Keith, eds., E. P. Thompson: Critical Perspectives (Cambridge: Polity, 1990).Google Scholar
Keane, John, The Life and Death of Democracy (London: Simon & Schuster, 2009).Google Scholar
Keane, Rory, “Reviewing the Justice and Security Hub Modality as Piloted in Liberia,” Stability, 1 (2012), 87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keedy, Edwin R., “Ignorance and Mistake in the Criminal Law,” Harvard Law Review, 22 (1908), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Vom Wesen der Demokratie (Tübingen: Mohr, 1920).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, General Theory of Law and State, trans. Anders Wedberg (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, [1925] 1949).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory: A Translation of the First Edition of the Reine Rechtslehre or Pure Theory of Law, trans. Bonnie Litschewski Paulson and Stanley L. Paulson (Oxford: Clarendon Press [1934] 1992).Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans, “Aristotle’s Doctrine of Justice,” in idem, What is Justice? Justice, Law and Politics in the Mirror of Science (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1957), pp. 110–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, David, The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan, A Critique of Adjudication: fin de siècle (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kenny, Michael, The First New Left: British Intellectuals After Stalin (London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1995).Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O., Philosophy and the State in France (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Pauline T., “Bargaining with Imperfect Information: A Study of Worker Perceptions of Legal Protection in an At-Will World,” Cornell Law Review, 83 (1998), 105–160.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, “International Courts: Uneven Judicialisation in Global Order,” in Crawford, James and Koskenniemi, Martti, eds., The Cambridge Companion to International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 203–227.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca, Montesquieu and the Parlement of Bordeaux (Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1996).Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca, “Parlement de Bordeux,” in Catherine Volpilhac-Auger, ed., Dictionnaire Montesquieu (Lyons: ENS, 2013), available atGoogle Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto, “The Rechtsstaat as Magic Wall,” in Scheuerman, William E., ed., The Rule of Law under Siege: Selected Essays of Franz L. Neumann and Otto Kirchheimer (Berkeley: University of California Press, [1967] 1996), pp. 243–266.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto, Von der Weimarer Republik zum Faschismus: Die Auflösung der demokratischen Rechtsordnung (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1976).Google Scholar
Kiss, Elizabeth, “Alchemy or Fool’s Gold? Assessing Feminist Doubts about Rights,” in Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Narayan, Uma, eds., Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspectives (Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press, 1997), pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Kiss, Erika A., “The Rules of the Game: Stochastic Rationality in Oakeshott’s Rule of Law Theory,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, eds., Law, Liberty, and the State: Oakeshott, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 214–233.Google Scholar
Klarin, Mirko, “The Impact of the ICTY Trials on Public Opinion in the Former Yugoslavia,” Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7 (2009), 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Friedrich, “Bonner Grundgesetz und Rechtsstaat,” Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 106 (1950), 390–411.Google Scholar
Klein, Natalie, Dispute Settlement in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Kleinfeld, Rachel, “Competing Definitions of the Rule of Law,” in Carothers, Thomas, ed., Promoting the Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge (Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2012), pp. 34–46.Google Scholar
Kmezic, Marko, EU Rule of Law Promotion (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017).Google Scholar
Koditschek, Theodore, “The Possibilities of Theory: Thompson’s Marxist History,” in Fieldhouse, Roger and Richard, K. S. Taylor, eds., E. P. Thompson and English Radicalism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013), pp. 70–95.Google Scholar
Koh, Harold Hongju, “The Trump Administration and International Law,” Washburn Law Journal, 56 (2017), pp. 413–469.Google Scholar
Kohler, Richard E., “Ignorance or Mistake of Law as a Defense in Criminal Cases,” Dickinson Law Review, 40 (1935), 113–122.Google Scholar
Koonz, Claudia, The Nazi Conscience (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, “International Legislation Today: Limits and Possibilities,” Wisconsin International Law Journal, 23 (2005), 61–92.Google Scholar
Kostal, R. W., A Jurisprudence of Power: Victorian Empire and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Kurkchiyan, Marina, “The Illegitimacy of Law in Post-Soviet Societies,” in Galligan, Denis J. and Kurkchiyan, Marina, eds., Law and Informal Practices: The Post-Communist Experience (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
Kurkchiyan, Marina, and Kubal, Agnieszka, eds., A Sociology of Justice in Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, Jessica Carew, “Establishing the Rule of Law in a Country Where Justice Hardly Exists,” The Atlantic, April 22, 2015.Google Scholar
Krastev, Ivan, and Holmes, Stephen, The Light That Failed: A Reckoning (London: Allen Lane, 2019).Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich, “Has the ‘Rule of Law’ Become a ‘Rule of Lawyers’?” in Palombella, Gianluigi and Walker, Neil, eds., Relocating the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009), pp. 171–196.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R., “Despotism in The Spirit of Laws,” in Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A., eds., Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001), pp. 231–272.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R., Liberalism with Honor (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, Sharon R., “Laws, Passions, and the Attractions of Right Action in Montesquieu,” Philosophy and Social Criticism, 32 (2006), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krey, Volker, “The Rule of Law in German Criminal Proceedings,” Rechtspolitisches Forum, 43 (2008), 1–26.Google Scholar
Krieger, Heike, ed., The Kosovo Conflict and International Law: An Analytical Documentation 1974–1999 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard, The German Idea of Freedom: History of a Political Tradition (Boston: Beacon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico, “The Decay of Consent: International Law in an Age of Global Public Goods,” American Journal of International Law, 108 (2014), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Anne O., “Aid in the Development Process,” Research Observer, 1 (1986), 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “The Hart–Fuller Debate, Transitional Societies and the Rule of Law,” in Cane, Peter, ed., The Hart–Fuller Debate in the Twenty-first Century (Oxford: Hart, 2009), 107–134.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “The Rule of Law: Legality, Teleology, Sociology,” in Palombella, Gianluigi and Walker, Neil, eds., Relocating the Rule of Law (Oxford: Hart, 2009), pp. 45–69.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Four Puzzles about the Rule of Law: Why, What, Where? And Who Cares?” in Fleming, James E., ed., Getting to the Rule of Law: NOMOS L (New York: New York University Press, 2011), pp. 64–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin, Philip Selznick: Ideals in the World (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Rule of Law (and Rechtsstaat),” in Silkenat, James R., Hickey, James E. Jr., and Barenboim, Peter D., eds., The Legal Doctrines of the Rule of Law and the Legal State (Rechtsstaat) (New York: Springer, 2014), pp. 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Rule of Law (and Rechtsstaat),” in Wright, James D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Elsevier, 2015), pp. 780–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Magna Carta and the Rule of Law Tradition,” Papers on Parliament, 65 (2016), 11–29.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “The Rule of Law: Pasts, Presents, and Two Possible Futures,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 12 (2016), 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Institutionalisation and Its Discontents: Constitutionalism versus (Anti-)Constitutional Populism in East Central Europe.” Paper presented at the Transnational Law King’s College, London, November 17, 2017.Google Scholar
Krygier, Martin, “Tempering Power,” in Adams, Maurice, Meuwese, Anne, and Ballin, Ernst Hirsch, eds., Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 35–49.Google Scholar
Krynen, Jacques, L’État de justice: France, XIIIe-XXe siècle, 2 vols. (Paris: Gallimard, 2009 and 2012).Google Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran, “Hayek and the State,” in Dyzenhaus, David and Poole, Thomas, eds., Law, Liberty and State: Oakeshot, Hayek and Schmitt on the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 281–294.Google Scholar
Kumm, Mattias, “International Law in National Courts: The International Rule of Law and the Limits of the Internationalist Model,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 44 (2003), 19–32.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Marcus J., and Schrank, Andrew, “Growth and Governance: Models, Measures, and Mechanisms,” Journal of Politics, 69 (2007), 538–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laband, Paul, Das Staatsrecht des Deutschen Reiches, vol. 2 (Tübingen: Laupp, 1878).Google Scholar
Laborde, Cécile, and Maynor, John, eds., Republicanism and Political Theory (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007).Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, Unspeakable Subjects: Feminist Essays in Legal and Social Theory (Oxford: Hart, 1998).Google Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Punishment and Political Economy in Contemporary Democracies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola, In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, Nicola and Pickard, Hanna, “The Chimera of Proportionality: Institutionalising Limits of Punishment in Contemporary Social and Political Systems,” Modern Law Review, 78 (2015), 216–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landau, David, “Abusive Constitutionalism,” University of California Davis Law Review, 47 (2013), 189–260.Google Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan, “Arguing from ‘Precedent’: Modern Perspectives Athenian Practice,” in Harris, Edward M. and Lene, Rubinstein, eds., The Law and the Courts in Ancient Greece (London: Bristol Classical Press, 2004), pp. 159–171.Google Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan, Law and Justice in the Courts of Classical Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan, “Judicial Review and the Athenian Constitution,” in Mogens, Herman Hansen, ed., Démocratie athénienne-démocratie modern: tradition et influences (Geneva: Fondation Hardt, 2010), pp. 235–263.Google Scholar
Lanni, Adriaan, Law and Order in Ancient Athens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W., “Law and Finance,” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (1998), 1113–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laquièze, Alain, “État de droit and National Sovereignty in France,” in Costa, Pietro and Zolo, Danilo, eds., The Rule of Law: History, Theory and Criticism (Springer, 2017), pp. 261–291.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine, “Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce,” in Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A., eds., Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001), pp. 335–374.Google Scholar
Lasson, Adolf, Das Culturideal und der Krieg (Berlin: Moeser, 1868).Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil d’État, trans. Marina Brilman and Alain Pottage (Cambridge: Polity, [2002] 2010).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Function of Law in the International Community, with an Introduction by Martti Koskenniemi (Oxford: Oxford University Press, [1933] 2011).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, “The Grotian Tradition in International Law,” British Yearbook of International Law, 23 (1946), 1–53.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens & Sons, 1958).Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch, “Is International Law a Part of the Law of England?,” in idem, International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol. 2: The Law of Peace, Part I, ed. Elihu Lauterpacht (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 537–569.Google Scholar
Lauth, Hans-Joachim, and Sehring, Jennifer, “Putting Deficient Rechtsstaat on the Research Agenda: Reflections on Diminished Subtypes,” Comparative Sociology, 8 (2009), 185–201.Google Scholar
Lax, Jeffrey R. “Political Constraints on Legal Doctrine: How Hierarchy Shapes the Law,” Journal of Politics, 74 (2012), 765–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
League of Nations, Report of the International Commission of Enquiry into the Existence of Slavery and Forced Labour in the Republic of Liberia (Geneva: League of Nations, 1930).Google Scholar
Ledford, Kenneth, “Formalizing the Rule of Law in Prussia: The Supreme Administrative Law Court, 1876–1914,” Central European History, 37 (2004), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, Greg, “Benjamin Duterrau: The Art of Conciliation,” Journal of War and Culture Studies, 8 (2015), 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letwin, Shirley Robin, “Morality and Law,” Ratio Juris, 2 (1989), 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letwin, Shirley Robin, On the History of the Idea of Law, ed. Reynolds, Noel B. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Tania Murray, The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leverick, Fiona, “Breach of the Peace after Smith v Donnelly,” Scots Law Times, 34 (2011), 257–262.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, andZiblatt, Daniel, How Democracies Die (New York: Crown, 2018).Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob, “Montesquieu’s Constitutional Legacies,” in Kingston, Rebecca, ed., Montesquieu and His Legacy (Albany: State University of New York, 2008), pp. 115–138.Google Scholar
Liberian Land Commission, 2014 Annual Report (Monrovia: Land Commission, 2014).Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl, The Bramble Bush: The Classic Lectures on the Law and Law School, ed. Sheppard, Steve (New York: Oxford University Press, [1951] 2008).Google Scholar
Loader, Ian, and Sparks, Richard, “Penal Populism and Epistemic Crime Control,” in Liebling, Alison, Maruna, Shadd, and McAra, Lesley, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 6th ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), pp. 98–115.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael, White Man’s Justice: South African Political Trials in the Black Consciousness Era (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael, Imperial Incarceration: Detention without Trial in the Making of British Colonial Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1980).Google Scholar
Loiselle, Marc, “Le concept d’État de droit dans la doctrine juridique française,” Ph.D. dissertation, Université Paris II Panthéon-Assas, 2000.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre, Sister/Outsider (New York: Crossing, 1984).Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, Public Law and Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, “The Functionalist Style in Public Law,” University of Toronto Law Journal, 55 (2005), 361–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, Martin, Foundations of Public Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovett, Frank, A Republic of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenthal, David, “Book I of Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws,” American Political Science Review, 53 (1959), 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugosi, Charles I., “Rule of Law or Rule by Law: The Detention of Yaser Hamdi,” American Journal of Criminal Law, 30 (2003), 225–278.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Das Recht der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1993).Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas, Politische Soziologie (Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2010).Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil, “Jurisprudence and the Constitution,” Current Legal Problems, 36 (1983), 13-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacCormick, D. Neil, “Der Rechtsstaat und die rule of law,” Juristenzeitung, 39 (1984), 65–70.Google Scholar
Mack, Kenneth W., Representing the Race: The Creation of the Civil Rights Lawyer (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Feminism Unmodified: Discourses in Life and Law (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Toward a Feminist Theory of State (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A., “The Power to Change,” in idem, Women’s Lives, Men’s Laws (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2005), pp. 103–108.Google Scholar
MacMillan, Ken, The Atlantic Imperial Constitution: Center and Periphery in the English Atlantic World (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, C. B., The Political Theory of Possessive Liberalism: From Hobbes to Locke (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Maistre, Joseph de, “Study on Sovereignty,” in idem, The Works of Joseph de Maistre, selected, trans., and with an Introduction by Jack Lively (New York: Schocken, [1794–1796] 1971), pp. 93–129.Google Scholar
Maistre, Joseph de, “Essay on the Generative Principle of Political Constitutions,” in idem, The Works of Joseph de Maistre, selected, trans., and with an Introduction by Jack Lively (New York: Schocken, [1814] 1971), pp. 147–181.Google Scholar
Maistre, Joseph de, “The Pope,” in idem, The Works of Joseph de Maistre, selected, trans., and with an Introduction by Jack Lively (New York: Schocken, [1819] 1971), pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
Maliks, Reidar, “Revolutionary Epigones: Kant and his Radical Followers,” History of Political Thought, 33 (2012), 647–671.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Lauri, “Russia and China Challenge the Western Hegemony in the Interpretation of International Law,” EJIL: Talk!, July 15, 2016.Google Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood, Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Mannheim, Karl, Konservatismus: Ein Beitrag zur Soziologie des Wissens (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1984).Google Scholar
Mantzavinos, C., Individuals, Institutions, and Markets (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mantzavinos, C., Douglass C. North, and Shariq, Syed, “Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance,” Perspectives on Politics, 2 (2004), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maravall, José María, “The Rule of Law as a Political Weapon,” in Maravall, José María and Przeworski, Adam, eds., Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), pp. 261–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maravall, José María, and Przeworski, Adam, eds., Democracy and the Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marglin, Jessica M., Across Legal Lines: Jews and Muslims in Modern Morocco (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Inga, Justice in Lüritz: Experiencing Socialist Law in East Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Susan, “The End of History? Reflections on some International Legal Theses,” European Journal of International Law, 8 (1997), 449–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmor, Andrei, “The Rule of Law and Its Limits,” Law and Philosophy, 24 (2004),1–43.Google Scholar
Marshall, David, “Introduction,” in idem, ed., The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard Law School, 2014), pp. xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar
Marshall, David, “Reboot Required: The United Nations’ Engagement in Rule of Law Reform in Postconflict and Fragile States,” in idem, ed., The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014), pp. 85–133.Google Scholar
Marshall, David, ed., The International Rule of Law Movement: A Crisis of Legitimacy and the Way Forward (Cambridge: Harvard Law School, 2014).Google Scholar
Marshall, Geoffrey, Constitutional Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Martin, Craig, “Symposium: The Assumptions of Koh’s Transnational Legal Process as Counter-Strategy,” Opinio Juris, February 26, 2018.Google Scholar
Martindale, Don, ed., Functionalism in the Social Sciences: The Strength and Limits of Functionalism in Anthropology, Economics, Political Science, and Sociology (Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1965).Google Scholar
Maru, Vivek, “Between Law and Society: Paralegals and the Provision of Justice Services in Sierra Leone and Worldwide,” Yale Journal of International Law, 31 (2006), 427–476.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi, Law’s Fragile State: Colonial, Authoritarian, and Humanitarian Legacies in Sudan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi, Shari‘a, Inshallah: Finding God in Somali Legal Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuda, Mari J., Charles R. Lawrence III, Richard Delgado, and Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw , et al., Words That Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Maus, Ingeborg, Zur Aufklärung der Demokratietheorie: Rechts- und demokratietheoretische Überlegungen im Anschluß an Kant (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1994).Google Scholar
May, Larry, Ancient Legal Thought: Equity, Justice, and Humaneness from Hammurabi and the Pharaos to Justinian and the Talmud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdams, Richard H., “An Attitudinal Theory of Expressive Law,” Oregon Law Review, 79 (2000), 339–390.Google Scholar
McCormick, John P., “Identifying or Exploiting the Paradoxes of Constitutional Democracy? An Introduction to Carl Schmitt’s Legality and Legitimacy,” in Schmitt, Carl, Legality and Legitimacy, trans. and ed. Seitzer, Jeffrey, with an Introduction by McCormick, John P. (Durham: Duke University Press, [1932] 2004), pp. xiii–xliii.Google Scholar
McDonald, Elisabeth, Powell, Rhonda, Stephens, Mamari, and, Hunter, Rosemary, eds., Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand Te Rino: A Two Stranded Rope (Oxford: Hart, 2017).Google Scholar
McNair, Arnold D., “Collective Security,” British Yearbook of International Law, 17 (1936), 150–164.Google Scholar
McWhinney, Edward, “The ‘New’ Countries and the ‘New’ International Law: The United Nations’ Special Conference on Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States,” American Journal of International Law, 60 (1966), 1–33.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, The Legacies of Law: Long-Run Consequences of Legal Development in South Africa, 1652–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, “The Practice of International Law: A Theoretical Analysis,” Law and Contemporary Problems, 76 (2013), 1–83.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, The Remnants of the Rechtsstaat: An Ethnography of Nazi Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, The Violence of Law: The Formation and Deformation of Gacaca Courts in Rwanda, 1994–2019 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, Lawfare: A Genealogy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, “The Rule of Law Imaginary: Regarding Iustitia,” in Sevel, Michael, ed., The Routledge Handbook of the Rule of Law (London: Routledge, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, The Idea of the Rechtsstaat: An Intellectual History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, “Racial Legalism,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18 (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, ed., Dual States: A Global History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, and Cole, Catherine M., “In the Theater of the Rule of Law: Performing the Rivonia Trial in South Africa, 1963–1964,” in Meierhenrich, Jens and Pendas, Devin O., eds., Political Trials in Theory and History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), pp. 229–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, Hinton, Alexander Laban, and Douglas, Lawrence, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Transitional Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021).Google Scholar
Meineke, J., “Gesetzinterpretation und Gesetzanwendung im Attischen Zivilprozess,” Revue Internationale des Droits de l’Antiquité, 18 (1971), 275–360.Google Scholar
Meinel, Florian, Der Jurist in der industriellen Gesellschaft: Ernst Forsthoff und seine Zeit (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merritt, Adrian, “The Nature and Function of Law: A Criticism of E. P. Thompson’s ‘Whigs and Hunters,’” British Journal of Law and Society, 7 (1980), 194–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle, Davis, Kevin, and Kingsbury, Benedict, eds., The Quiet Power of Indicators: Measuring Governance, Corruption, and Rule of Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K., Social Theory and Social Structure (New York: The Free Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Meyer-Laurin, Harald, Gesetz und Billigkeit im attischen Prozess (Weimar: Böhlaus Nachfolger, 1965).Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I., “Foreword: ‘Racialism’ and Reason,” Michigan Law Review, 95 (1997), 723–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migdal, Joel, “Studying the State,” in Lichbach, Mark Irving and Zuckerman, Alan S., eds., Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), pp. 208–235.Google Scholar
Migdal, Joel S., The State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milanović, Marko, “The Impact of the ICTY on the Former Yugoslavia: An Anticipatory Postmortem,” American Journal of International Law, 110 (2016), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Kate, The Origins of International Investment Law: Empire, Environment and the Safeguarding of Capital (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, Considerations on Representative Government (London: Parker, Son & Bourn, 1861).Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, The Subjection of Women (Indianapolis: Hackett, [1869] 1988).Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W., Black Rights/White Wrongs: The Critique of Racial Liberalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minow, Martha, “Justice Engendered,” Harvard Law Review, 101 (1987), 10–95.Google Scholar
Minow, Martha, Making All the Difference: Inclusion, Exclusion, and American Law (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990).Google Scholar
Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik, “On the Limited Interchangeability of Rule of Law Measures,” European Political Science Review, 3 (2011), 371–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik, “Systematizing Thin and Thick Conceptions of the Rule of Law,” Justice System Journal, 33 (2012), 136–153.Google Scholar
Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik, The Rule of Law: Definitions, Measures, Patterns and Causes (London: Palgrave, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mona, Martino, “The Normative Content of the Notion of the Rechtsstaat in Late Modernity,” Punishment and Society, 15 (2013), 412–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montesquieu, , De l’esprit des lois in Oeuvres complètes, vol. 2 ed. Caillois, Roger (Paris: Pléiade, 1951).Google Scholar
Montesquieu, , The Spirit of the Laws, trans. and ed. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia Carolyn, and Stone, Harold Samuel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, [1748] 1989).Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington Jr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Moores, Christopher, Civil Liberties and Human Rights in Twentieth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrall, John B., Political Thought in Medieval Times (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Morrill, John, “The Stuarts (1603–1688),” in Morgan, Kenneth O., ed., The Oxford Illustrated History of Britain (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984), pp. 286–351.Google Scholar
Morris, Douglas, Legal Sabotage: Ernst Fraenkel in Hitler’s Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, William, News from Nowhere, ed. Redmond, James (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, [1890] 1970).Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A., “Monarchy’s Paradox: Honor in the Face of Sovereign Power,” in Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A., eds., Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001), pp. 159–230.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A., “What Montesquieu Taught: Perfection Does not Concern Men or Things Universally,” in Kingston, Rebecca, ed., Montesquieu and His Legacy (Albany: State University of New York, 2008), pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Mounk, Yascha, The People vs Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir, The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Reform in Egypt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir, and Ginsburg, Tom, “Introduction: The Function of Courts in Authoritarian Politics,” in Tom Ginsburg and Tamir Moustafa, eds., Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 1–21.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History (Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2010).Google Scholar