Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-7ccbd9845f-692xr Total loading time: 0.646 Render date: 2023-01-29T07:10:19.249Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2019

Lynne Magnusson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
David Schalkwyk
Affiliation:
Queen Mary University of London
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Abbott, E. A., A Shakespearian Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan, 1870.Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia, ‘Literary Language’, The Cambridge History of the English Language, ed. Lass, Roger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, vol. 3, pp. 539653.Google Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia, ‘Questions of Identity in Renaissance Drama: New Historicism Meets Old Philology’, Shakespeare Quarterly 61.1 (2010): 5677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adamson, Sylvia, ‘Understanding Shakespeare’s Grammar: A Study in Small Words’, Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language, ed. S. Adamson, , L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson, and K. Wales. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2001, pp. 210–236.
Adamson, S., Hunter, L., Magnusson, L., Thompson, A., and Wales, K. (eds.), Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2001.Google Scholar
Alexander, Catherine M. S. (ed.), Shakespeare and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Altman, Joel B., The Improbability of Othello: Rhetorical Anthropology and Shakespearean Selfhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Joel B., The Tudor Play of Mind: Rhetorical Inquiry and the Development of Elizabethan Drama. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Aristotle, , On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, trans. G. A. Kennedy, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, The Rhythms of English Poetry. London: Longman, 1982.Google Scholar
Attridge, Derek, Well-Weighed Syllables: Elizabethan Verse in Classical Metres. London: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M., The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed. Holquist, Michael, trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M., ‘The Problem of Speech Genres’, Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. Emerson, Caryl and Holquist, Michael. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986, pp. 60102.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W., William Shakspere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles, Joan C. Beal, and Philip A. Shaw, The English Language: A Historical Introduction. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Barker, William (ed.), The Adages of Erasmus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Barton, Anne, ‘Leontes and the Spider: Language and Speaker in Shakespeare’s Last Plays’, Essays, Mainly Shakespearean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 161181.Google Scholar
Barton, John, Playing Shakespeare. London: Methuen, 1984.Google Scholar
Basu, Anupam, Hope, Jonathan, and Witmore, Michael, ‘The Professional and Linguistic Communities of Early Modern Dramatists’, Community-Making in Early Stuart Theatres: Stage and Audience, ed. Sell, Roger D., Wilcox, Helen, and Johnson, Anthony W.. London: Routledge, 2014, pp. 6394.Google Scholar
Beier, Lee, ‘Anti-Language or Jargon? Canting in the English Underworld in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, Languages and Jargons: Contributions to a Social History of Language, ed. Burke, Peter and Porter, Roy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995, pp. 64101.Google Scholar
Bell, Allan, The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar
Bergen, Benjamin K., Louder Than Words: The New Science of How the Mind Makes Meaning. New York: Basic Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Black, James, ‘Henry IV: A World of Figures Here’, Shakespeare: The Theatrical Dimension, ed. McGuire, Philip C. and Samuelson, David A.. New York: AMS Press, 1979, pp. 165183.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F., A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language. New York: Palgrave, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F., Non-Standard Language in English Literature. London: Deutsch, 1981.Google Scholar
Blake, N. F., Shakespeare’s Language: An Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, N. F., Shakespeare’s Non-Standard English: A Dictionary of his Informal Language. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
Blank, Paula, Broken English: Dialects and the Politics of Language in Renaissance Writings. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen, An Essay on Shakespeare’s Sonnets. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen, Precious Nonsense: The Gettysburg Address, Ben Jonson’s Epitaphs on his Children, and Twelfth Night. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, ‘The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges’, Social Science Information 16 (1977): 645668.CrossRef
Bourdieu, Pierre, Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity, 1991.
Brown, Penelope, and Levinson, Stephen C., Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.CrossRef
Brown, Roger, and Gilman, Albert, ‘Politeness Theory and Shakespeare’s Four Major Tragedies’, Language in Society 18 (1989): 159212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, Mattie, ‘Plotting the “Female Wits” Controversy: Gender, Genre, and Printed Plays, 1670–1699’, Early Modern Studies after the Digital Turn, ed. Estill, Laura, Jackaki, Diane, and Ullyot, Michael. Tempe: Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 2016, pp. 3559.Google Scholar
Burt, Richard, ‘To e- or not to e-? Disposing of Schlockspeare in the Age of Digital Media’, Shakespeare after Mass Media, ed. Burt, Richard. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp. 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calderwood, James L., Metadrama in Shakespeare’s Henriad: ‘Richard II’ to ‘Henry V’. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley, Philosophy the Day after Tomorrow. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K., and Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change. 2nd edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Amy, Shakespearean Neuroplay: Reinvigorating the Study of Dramatic Texts and Performance Through Cognitive Science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Bradin, ‘Tender Distance: Latinity and Desire in Shakespeare’s Sonnets’, A Companion to Shakespeare’s Sonnets, ed. Schoenfeldt, Michael. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 242260.Google Scholar
Coulthard, Malcolm, An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1985.Google Scholar
Craig, Hugh, ‘Shakespeare’s Vocabulary: Myth and Reality’, Shakespeare Quarterly 62.1 (2011): 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Hugh, ‘Stylistic Analysis and Authorship Studies’, A Companion to Digital Humanities, ed. Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray, and Unsworth, John. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004, pp. 273288.Google Scholar
Craig, Hugh, and Greatley-Hirsch, Brett, Style, Computers, and Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Hugh, and Kinney, Arthur F. (eds.), Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas, Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Crystal, David, The Oxford Dictionary of Original Shakespearean Pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David, Think on My Words: Exploring Shakespeare’s Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Language and Characterisation in Plays and Texts: People in Plays and Other Texts, Textual Explorations. Harlow: Longman, 2001.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian, The Literary Culture of the Reformation: Grammar and Grace. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delabastita, Dirk, and D’hulst, Lieven (eds.), European Shakespeares: Translating Shakespeare in the Romantic Age. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delabastita, Dirk, and Hoenselaars, Ton (eds.), Multilingualism in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, R. W., Shakespeare’s Proverbial Language: An Index. Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Donawerth, Jane, Shakespeare and the Sixteenth-Century Study of Language. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Drakakis, John, ‘Shakespeare in Quotations’, Studying British Culture: An Introduction, ed. Bassnett, Susan. London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 152172.Google Scholar
Edelman, Charles, Shakespeare’s Military Language: A Dictionary. London and New Brunswick: Athlone, 2000.Google Scholar
Edwards, Philip, Inga-Stina Ewbank, and G. K. Hunter (eds.), Shakespeare’s Styles: Essays in Honour of Kenneth Muir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Elam, Keir, Shakespeare’s Universe of Discourse: Language-Games in the Comedies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Elliott, Ward E. Y., and Valenza, Robert J., ‘Shakespeare’s Vocabulary: Did It Dwarf All Others?’, Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches, ed. Ravassat, Mireille and Culpeper, Jonathan. London: Continuum, 2011, pp. 3457.Google Scholar
Empson, William, Seven Types of Ambiguity. London: Chatto & Windus, 1930.
Enterline, Lynn, Shakespeare’s Schoolroom. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Erasmus, , Collected Works of Erasmus, trans. C. Fantazzi, 25. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Erasmus, , De conscribendis epistolis, ed. Margolin, J. C., in Erasmus, , Opera omnia, I-2. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1971, pp. 205–579.Google Scholar
Erasmus, , De copia, ed. Knott, B., Opera omnia, I-6. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1988; trans. B. Knott, Collected Works of Erasmus, 24. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Escolme, Bridget, Talking to the Audience: Shakespeare, Performance, Self. Abingdon: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Ewbank, Inga-Stina, ‘Shakespeare Translation as Cultural Exchange’, Shakespeare Survey 48 (1995): 112.Google Scholar
Eyre, Richard, and Wright, Nicholas, Changing Stages. London: Bloomsbury, 2000.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley E., ‘How to Do Things with Austin and Searle: Speech Act Theory and Literary Criticism’, MLN 91.5 (1976): 9831025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, Lorna, Shakespeare’s Third Keyboard: The Significance of Rime in Shakespeare’s Plays. London: Associated University Presses, 2000.Google Scholar
Foakes, R. A., and Rickert, R. T. (eds.), Henslowe’s Diary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Freedman, Penelope, Power and Passion in Shakespeare’s Pronouns: Interrogating ‘You’ and ‘Thou’. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.Google Scholar
Freeman, Donald, ‘“Catch[ing] the Nearest Way”: Macbeth and Cognitive Metaphor’, Journal of Pragmatics 24 (1995): 689708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garber, Marjorie, ‘Character Assassination: Shakespeare, Anita Hill, and JFK’ and ‘Shakespeare as Fetish’, Symptoms of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1998, pp. 153178.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred, ‘Regional and Social Variation’, The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776, ed. Lass, Roger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 459538.Google Scholar
Graham, Kenneth J. E., The Performance of Conviction: Plainness and Rhetoric in the Early English Renaissance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Eric, ‘On Lines and Grooves from Shakespeare to Tennyson’, Tennyson among the Poets: Bicentenary Essays, ed. Douglas-Fairhurst, Robert and Perry, Seamus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 132159.Google Scholar
Herman, Vimala, Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London and New York: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
Hoenselaars, Ton. ‘Shakespeare and the Cultures of Translation’, Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013): 206219.Google Scholar
Hoenselaars, Ton. (ed.), Shakespeare and the Language of Translation. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2004.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, The Authorship of Shakespeare’s Plays: A Socio-linguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, Shakespeare’s Grammar. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance. London: Arden, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, ‘Shakespeare’s “Natiue English”’, A Companion to Shakespeare, ed. Kastan, David Scott. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 239255.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, ‘Who Invented “Gloomy”? Lies People Want to Believe about Shakespeare’, Memoria di Shakespeare 3 (2016): 2145.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, and Witmore, Michael, ‘The Hundredth Psalm to the Tune of “Green Sleeves”: Digital Approaches to Shakespeare’s Language of Genre’, Shakespeare Quarterly 61.3 (2010): 357390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, Jonathan, and Witmore, Michael, ‘The Language of Macbeth’, Macbeth: The State of Play, ed. Thompson, Ann. London: Bloomsbury, 2014, pp. 183208.Google Scholar
Houston, John Porter, Shakespearean Sentences: A Study in Style and Syntax. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Hussey, S. S., The Literary Language of Shakespeare. London: Longman, 1982.Google Scholar
Hutson, Lorna, Circumstantial Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutson, Lorna, The Invention of Suspicion: Law and Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, ‘On Linguistic Aspects of Translation’, On Translation, ed. Brower, Reuben A.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1959, pp. 232239.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Andrew K., Dramatic Dialogue: The Duologue of Personal Encounter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Dennis (ed.), Foreign Shakespeare: Contemporary Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A., Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2003.Google Scholar
Kermode, Frank, Shakespeare’s Language. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2000.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, John, Shakespeare’s Binding Language. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Arthur H., The Language of Satirized Characters in Poetaster: A Socio-Stylistic Analysis, 1597–1602. Lund: Gleerup, 1941.Google Scholar
Kolentsis, Alysia, ‘“Grammar Rules” in the Sonnets: Sidney and Shakespeare’, The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare’s Poetry, ed. Post, Jonathan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 168184.Google Scholar
Kolentsis, Alysia, ‘Shakespeare’s Lexical Style’, Shakespeare In Our Time: A Shakespeare Association of America Companion, ed. Callaghan, Dympna and Gossett, Suzanne. London: Arden Bloomsbury, 2016, pp. 306311.Google Scholar
Kolentsis, Alysia, ‘Shakespeare’s Linguistic Creativity: A Reappraisal’, Literature Compass 11.4 (2014): 258266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark, Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Lamb, Jonathan P., Shakespeare in the Marketplace of Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanham, Richard A., A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms. 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas, ‘Marketing’, The Oxford Handbook to Shakespeare, ed. Kinney, Arthur. London: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 499515.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger (ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume III, 1476–1776. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Leith, Dick. A Social History of English. 2nd edn. London: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C., Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Raphael, Shakespeare, Rhetoric and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter, Elizabethan Rhetoric: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter, A History of Renaissance Rhetoric 1380–1620. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter, ‘Learning and Transforming Conventional Wisdom: Reading and Rhetoric in the Elizabethan Grammar School’, Renaissance Studies 32.3 (2018): 427445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter, Reading and Rhetoric in Montaigne and Shakespeare. London: Bloomsbury, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter, (ed.), Renaissance Rhetoric. London: Macmillan, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Peter, (ed.), Rhetoric’s Questions, Reading and Interpretation. London: Palgrave, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne, ‘Dialogue’, Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language, ed. S. Adamson, , L. Hunter, L. Magnusson, A. Thompson, and K. Wales. London: Arden Shakespeare, 2001, pp. 130143.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne, ‘Grammatical Theatricality in Richard III: Schoolroom Queens and Godly Optatives’, Shakespeare Quarterly 64.1 (2013): 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne, ‘Language’, The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare, ed. Kinney, Arthur. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 239257.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne, ‘A Play of Modals: Grammar and Potential Action in Early Shakespeare’, Shakespeare Survey 62 (2009): 6980.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lynne, ‘Shakespeare and the Language of Possibility’, A Folger Shakespeare Library podcast: Shakespeare’s Birthday Lecture 2015, 16 April 2015 folgerpedia.folger.edu.
Magnusson, Lynne, Shakespeare and Social Dialogue: Dramatic Language and Elizabeth Letters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoesian, Gregory M., ‘The Turn-Taking Model for Natural Conversation’, Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993, pp. 7297.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Julie, and Rumbold, Kate (eds.), Shakespeare and Quotation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Russ, Shakespeare and the Arts of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
McDonald, Russ, Shakespeare Reread: The Texts in New Contexts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
McDonald, Russ, Shakespeare’s Late Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Oliver, Turn-Taking in Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Morris, Pam (ed.), The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev and Voloshinov. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.Google Scholar
Morse, Ruth, Truth and Convention in the Middle Ages: Rhetoric, Representation, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Moss, Ann, Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrove, S., ‘Thieves’ Cant in King Lear’, English Studies 62 (1981): 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, Catherine, Uncommon Tongues: Eloquence and Eccentricity in the English Renaissance. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon, Late Shakespeare: A New World of Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon, and Stern, Tiffany, Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia, Literary Fat Ladies: Rhetoric, Gender, Property. London and New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Parker, Patricia, Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Porter, Joseph A., The Drama of Speech Acts: Shakespeare’s Lancastrian Tetralogy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Porter, Joseph A., ‘Eloquence and Liminality: Glossing Mercutio’s Speech Acts’, Romeo and Juliet, ed. White, R. S.. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001, pp. 166193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintilian, , Institutio oratoria, trans. D. A. Russell. 5 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ravassat, Mireille, and Culpeper, Jonathan (eds.), Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language: Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Continuum, 2011.Google Scholar
Reddy, William M., The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhetorica ad Herennium, trans. H. Caplan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1954.
Rokison, Abigail, Shakespearean Verse Speaking: Text and Theatre Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rutter, Carol Chillington, ‘Shakespeare and School’, Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy, ed. Edmondson, Paul and Wells, Stanley. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 133144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmon, Vivian, and Burness, Edwina (eds.), A Reader in the Language of Shakespeare, Love and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. Shakespearean Drama: Collected Essays. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1987.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David, ‘Cursing to Learn: Theatricality and the Creation of Character in The Tempest’, Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013): 6781.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David, Literature and the Touch of the Real. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David, Shakespeare, Love and Language: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalkwyk, David, Speech and Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schalkwyk, David, ‘Shakespeare’s Speech’, Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 40.2 (2010): 373400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John, ‘A Classification of Speech Acts’, Language and Society 5 (1979): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, Antony, Beside Myself. London: Arrow Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel, Cyberformalism: Histories of Linguistic Forms in the Digital Archive. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Shore, Daniel, ‘Shakespeare’s Constructicon’, Shakespeare Quarterly 66.2 (2015): 113136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemon, James, Word Against Word: Shakespearean Utterance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2002.Google Scholar
‘Silva rhetoricae: The Forest of Rhetoric’, ed. G. Burton at http://rhetoric.byu.edu.
Skinner, Quentin, Forensic Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce, The Acoustic World of Early Modern England: Attending to the O-Factor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce, Phenomenal Shakespeare. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. Gregory (ed.), Elizabethan Critical Essays. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1904.Google Scholar
Sokol, B. J., and Sokol, Mary, Shakespeare’s Legal Language: A Dictionary. London and New Brunswick: Athlone, 2000.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany, Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarlinskaja, Marina, Shakespeare and the Versification of English Drama, 1561–1642. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Tarlinskaja, Marina, Shakespeare’s Verse: Iambic Pentameter and the Poet’s Idiosyncrasies. New York: Peter Lang, 1987.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary, ‘Artiginality: Authorship after Postmodernism’, The New Oxford Shakespeare: Authorship Companion, ed. Taylor, Gary and Egan, Gabriel. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 326.Google Scholar
Tootalian, Jacob, ‘Without Measure: The Language of Shakespeare’s Prose’, Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies 13.4 (2013): 4760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Es, Bart, Shakespeare in Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vickers, Brian, The Artistry of Shakespeare’s Prose. London: Methuen, 1968.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian, Shakespeare, Co-Author: A Historical Study of Five Collaborative Plays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian, ‘Shakespeare’s Use of Rhetoric’, A New Companion to Shakespeare Studies, ed. Muir, K. and Schoenbaum, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971, pp. 8398.Google Scholar
Walter, Harriet, Brutus and Other Heroines: Playing Shakespeare’s Roles for Women. London: Nick Hern Books, 2016.Google Scholar
Walter, Harriet, Other People’s Shoes. London: Nick Hern Books, 1999.Google Scholar
Weimann, Robert, Author’s Pen and Actor’s Voice: Playing and Writing in Shakespeare’s Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witmore, Michael, Hope, Jonathan, and Gleicher, Mike, ‘Digital Approaches to the Language of Shakespearean Tragedy’, The Oxford Handbook of Shakespearean Tragedy, ed. Neill, Michael and Schalkwyk, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 316335.Google Scholar
Wofford, Susanne L., ‘“To you I give myself, for I am yours”: Erotic Performance and Theatrical Performatives in As You Like It’, Shakespeare Reread, ed. McDonald, Russ. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1994, pp. 147169.Google Scholar
Wright, George T., Shakespeare’s Metrical Art. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Yachnin, Paul (ed.), Shakespeare’s World of Words. London: The Arden Shakespeare, Bloomsbury, 2015.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Lynne Magnusson, University of Toronto, David Schalkwyk, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language
  • Online publication: 01 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443668.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Lynne Magnusson, University of Toronto, David Schalkwyk, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language
  • Online publication: 01 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443668.017
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Edited by Lynne Magnusson, University of Toronto, David Schalkwyk, Queen Mary University of London
  • Book: The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare's Language
  • Online publication: 01 July 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443668.017
Available formats
×