Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-n9lxd Total loading time: 1.377 Render date: 2022-10-04T21:37:05.045Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": false, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2017

Giuseppina D'Oro
Affiliation:
Keele University
Søren Overgaard
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, F. 1992. ‘Does Philosophy Only State What Everyone Admits? Discussion of the Method of Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 27, 246–54.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1951. Minima Moralia. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. Jephcott, E. F. N.. London: NLB, 1974].Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1966. Negative Dialektik, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as Negative Dialectics, by E. B. Ashton, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1973]. Alternative translation, by D. Redmond, available online: www.efn.org/~dredmond/ndtrans.html; last accessed 22 August 2011.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1977. ‘The Actuality of Philosophy’[1931], Telos 10 (1) 120–33.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1984. ‘Essay as Form’, trans. Hullot-Kentor, B. and Will, F., New German Critique 32, 151–71.Google Scholar
Adorno, T. W. 1998. ‘Why Still Philosophy’[‘Wozu noch Philosophie’, 1963], trans. Pickford, H. W. in Critical Models. New York: Columbia University Press, 517.Google Scholar
Aflalo, T. et al. 2015. ‘Decoding Motor Imagery from the Posterior Parietal Cortex of a Tetraplegic Human’, Science 348 (6237), 906–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcock, J. 2013. Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, 10th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. 2012. Experimental Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. 2016. ‘Philosophical Expertise’, in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, eds Systma, J. and Buckwalter, W.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 555–67.Google Scholar
Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. 2007. ‘Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophy Compass 2, 5680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. 2014. ‘The “Unreliability” of Epistemic Intuitions’, in Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, eds Machery, E. and O’Neill, E.. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 128–44.Google Scholar
Allen, A. 2016. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. 2011. ‘Situating Axel Honneth in the Frankfurt School Tradition’, in Axel Honneth: Critical Essays, ed. Petherbridge, D.. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, K. 2015. The Animal Mind. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Apel, K.-O. 1997. ‘Regulative Ideas or Truth-Happening? An Attempt to Answer the Question of the Conditions of Possibility of Valid Understanding’, trans. Sommermeier, R., in The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer, ed. Hahn, L. E.. Chicago: Open Court, 6795.Google Scholar
Aristotle, 1955. Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta, ed. Ross, W. D.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Augustine, 2009. Confessions, ed. and trans. de Labriolle, P., Paris : Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. Sense and Sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1970. Philosophical Papers, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1952. Language, Truth and Logic. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1956. The Problem of Knowledge, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., and Anderson, M. C. 2009. Memory. Hove and New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Baggott, J. M. D., and Duff, M. 2013. ‘A Theory of Everything … Has Physics Gone Too Far?’ The Guardian, 16 June 2013. Online: www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jun/16/has-physics-gone-too-far
Baker, L. R. 2000. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, L. R. 2012. Naturalism and the First-person Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barlow, H. B. 1985. ‘The Role of Single Neurons in the Psychology of Perception’, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37A, 121–45.Google Scholar
Barnes, B. 1977. Interests and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bealer, G. 1998. ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy’, in Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and its Role in Philosophical Theorizing, eds DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 201–39.Google Scholar
Bealer, G. 1998. ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy’, in Rethinking Intuition, eds DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W.. Rowman and Littlefield, 201–40.Google Scholar
Beebe, J., and Shea, J. 2013. ‘Gettierized Knobe Effects’, Episteme 10, 219–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, F. C. 1992. Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism: The Genesis of Modern German Political Thought, 1790–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J., Cutrofello, A., and Livingston, P. (eds) 2015a. Beyond the Analytic–Continental Divide: Pluralist Philosophy in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bell, J., Cutrofello, A., and Livingston, P. 2015b. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Philosophy as Synthetic Philosophy’, in Beyond the Analytic–Continental Divide, eds Bell, J., Cutrofello, C., and Livingston, P.. London: Routledge, 113.Google Scholar
Bengson, John. 2013. ‘Experimental Attacks on Intuitions and Answers’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3), 495532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, K. 2009. ‘Composition, Colocation and Metaontology’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D. J., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford University Press, 3876.Google Scholar
Bennett, K. 2015. ‘There is No Special Problem with Metaphysics’, Philosophical Studies. DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0439-0.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., andHacker, P. M. S. 2003. Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1977. The Two Sources of Morality and Religion, trans. Audra, R. A. and Brereton, C., with the assistance of Carter, W. H.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 1992. The Creative Mind, trans. Andison, M. L.. New York: The Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Bergson, H. 2007. Mind-Energy, trans. Carr, H. Wildon. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 2000. Three Critics of the Enlightenment: Vico, Hamann, Herder, ed. Hardy, H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bernet, R., Kern, I., and Marbach, E. 1993. An Introduction to Husserlian Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. 1996. ‘On Dexterity and Its Development’, in Dexterity and Its Development, eds Latash, M. L. and Turvey, M. T.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bernstein, R. J. 1983. Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Practice. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Berthoz, A. 2009. La Simplexité. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Berthoz, A., and Petit, J.-L. (eds) 2014. Complexité-Simplexité. Paris: Collège de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertram, C. 2012. ‘Jean Jacques Rousseau’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/rousseau/>.
Bird, A. 2010. ‘Social Knowing: The Social Sense of “Scientific Knowledge”’, Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1), 2356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, S. 1993. ‘Review of Paul Johnston’s Wittgenstein and Moral Philosophy’, Ethics 103, 588–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattner, W. D. 2000. ‘Life Is Not Literature’, in The Many Faces of Time, eds Brough, J. B. and Embree, L. E.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 187201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, F. 1989. ‘The History of Anthropology’, in A Franz Boas Reader. The University of Chicago Press, 2336.Google Scholar
Bogen, J., and Woodward, J. 1988. ‘Saving the Phenomena’, Philosophical Review, 97, 303–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boghossian, P. 1996. ‘Analyticity Reconsidered’, Nous 30 (3), 360–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollacher, M. 1987. ‘“Natur” und “Vernunft” in Herders Entwurf einer Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit’, in Johann Gottfried Herder 1744–1803, ed. Sauder, Gerhard. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 114–24.Google Scholar
BonJour, L. 1998. In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bookchin, M. 1995. Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism, available online at URL = <http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/bookchin/soclife.htm>.
Bourget, D., and Chalmers, D. J. 2014. ‘What do Philosophers Believe?’, Philosophical Studies 170 (3), 465500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, K., and Nagel, J. 2014. ‘The Reliability of Epistemic Intuitions’, in Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy, eds Machery, E. and O’Neill, E.. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 109–27.Google Scholar
Bradley, F. H. 1897. Appearance and Reality, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2011. Perspectives on Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Braver, L. 2007. A Thing of This World: A History of Continental Anti-Realism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Bricker, P. forthcoming. ‘Realism without Parochialism’, in Modal Matters: Essays in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P. 2007. ‘Abnormal Oscillatory Synchronization in the Motor System Leads to Impaired Movement’, Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17, 656–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brudney, D. 1998. Marx’s Attempt to Leave Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buck-Morss, S. 1977. The Origin of Negative Dialectics: Theodor W. Adorno, Walter Benjamin, and the Frankfurt School. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Buckwalter, W. forthcoming. ‘Epistemic Contextualism and Linguistic Behavior’, in The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism, ed. Ichikawa, J.. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bultmann, C. 1999. Die biblische Urgeschichte in der Aufklärung. Johann Gottfried Herders Interpretation der Genesis als Antwort auf die Religionskritik David Humes. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Burgess, A., and Plunkett, D. 2013a. ‘Conceptual Ethics I’, Philosophy Compass 8 (12), 1091–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, A., and Plunkett, D. 2013b. ‘Conceptual Ethics II’, Philosophy Compass 8 (12), 1102–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, T. F. 2013. What Pragmatism Was. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Cappelen, H. 2011. ‘Against Assertion’, in Assertion: New Philosophical Essays, eds Brown, J. and Cappelen, H.. Oxford University Press, 2148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, H., and Dever, J. 2013. The Inessential Indexical: On the Philosophical Insignificance of Perspective and the First Person. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardwell, M. 1996. Dictionary of Psychology. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1950. ‘Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4 (2), 2040.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1956a. Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. 1956b. ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’ [1950]. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, 205–21.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. 2011. The Opacity of Mind. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carus, A. W. 2007. ‘Carnap’s Intellectual Development’, in The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, eds Friedman, M. and Creath, R.. Cambridge University Press, 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1961. Freiheit und Form. Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. 1969. Must We Mean What We Say. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. 1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, S. 2002. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays, updated edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Caviness, J. N. 2014. ‘Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s Disease Behaviour – a View from the Network’, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders 20 (Suppl. 1), S39S43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerbone, D. R. 2003. ‘Distance and Proximity in Phenomenology: Husserl and Heidegger’, The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy III, 126.Google Scholar
Cerbone, D. R. forthcoming. ‘Making Sense of Phenomenological Sense-Making: On Moore on Husserl’, in Philosophical Topics.
Chalmers, D. J. 2011. ‘Verbal Disputes’, Philosophical Review 120 (4), 515–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. 2012. Constructing the World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, D. J. 2015. ‘Why Isn’t there More Progress in Philosophy?’, Philosophy 90 (1), 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D. J., and Jackson, F. 2001. ‘Conceptual Analysis and Reductive Explanation’, Philosophical Review 110 (3), 315–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (eds) 2009. Metametaphysics. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, J. 1993. Wild Swans: Three Daughters of China. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Changeux, J.-P., and Ricoeur, P. 1998. Ce qui nous fait penser. La nature et la règle. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Chase, J., and Reynolds, J. 2011. Analytic versus Continental: Arguments on the Methods and Value of Philosophy. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Cheney, D. L., and Seyfarth, R. M. 2007. Baboon Metaphysics. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chisholm, R. 1989. Theory of Knowledge, 3rd edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. Amsterdam: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chroust, A.-H. 1969. Aristotle, Protrepicus: A Reconstruction. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Clark, R. T. 1955. Herder: His Life and Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. 2012. ‘Blaise Pascal’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/pascal/>.
Cohen, H. 1904. Ethik des reinen Willens. Berlin: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1993. The Idea of History [1946]. Revised edition, with an introduction by J. Van der Dussen. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1998a. An Essay on Metaphysics with an Introduction and Additional Material, ed. Martin, R.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1998b. An Essay on Metaphysics [1940]. Revised edition with an introduction by R. Martin. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 1999. The Principles of History, eds Dray, W. H. and Van der Dussen, Jan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 2005a. An Essay on Philosophical Method with an Introduction and Additional Material, eds Connolly, J. and D’Oro, G.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R. G. 2005b. An Essay on Philosophical Method [1933]. Revised edition with an introduction by J. Connelly and G. D’Oro. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, J. B. (ed.) 1950. The Overthrow of the Phlogiston Theory: The Chemical Revolution of 1775–1789. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, D. 2011. Adorno on Nature. Durham, UK: Acumen.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G. 1999. ‘Spectral History: Narrative, Nostalgia, and the Time of the I’, Research in Phenomenology 29, 83104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, S. G. 2001a. ‘Question, Reflection, and Philosophical Method in Heidegger’s Early Freiburg Lectures’, in his Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 129–51.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. G. 2001b. ‘Gnostic Phenomenology: Eugen Fink and the Critique of Transcendental Reason’, in his Husserl, Heidegger, and the Space of Meaning. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 244–63.Google Scholar
Crowell, S. (ed.) 2012. The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curley, E. 1996. ‘Kissinger, Spinoza and Genghis Khan’, in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, ed. Garrett, D.. Cambridge University Press, 315–82.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, D. 1994. ‘Heidegger’s Method: Philosophical Concepts as Formal Indications’, The Review of Metaphysics 47, 775–95.Google Scholar
Dauer, W., and Przedborski, S. 2003. ‘Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms and Models’, Neuron 39, 889909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. 2004. Art as Performance. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, T. M. et al. 2010. ‘Genetic Animal Models of Parkinson’s Disease’, Neuron 66, 646–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, S. 1976. The Prime of Life, trans. Green, P.. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1990. Logic of Sense, trans. Lester, M. with Stivale, C., ed. Boundas, C.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1991a. Empiricism and Subjectivity: An Essay on Hume’s Theory of Human Nature, trans. Boundas, C. V.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1991b. Bergsonism, trans. Tomlinson, H. and Habberjam, B.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition, trans. Patton, P.. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1995. Difference and Repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1987. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Vol. 2: A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Massumi, B.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Massumi, B.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. 1994. What is Philosophy?, trans. Tomlinson, Hugh and Burchill, Graham. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Delong, M. R. 1990. ‘Primate Models of Movement Disorders of Basal Ganglia Origin’, Trends in Neurosciences 13 (7), 281–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 1971. ‘Intentional Systems’, Journal of Philosophy 68 (4), 87106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness Explained. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1981. Positions, trans. Bass, A.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1982. Margins of Philosophy, trans. Bass, A.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1992. ‘Force of Law: The Mystical Foundation of Authority’, trans. Quaintance, M., in Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, eds Cornell, D., Rosenfeld, M., and Carlson, D. G.. New York: Routledge, 367.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1993. Aporias, trans. Dutoit, T.. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1994. Specters of Marx, trans. Kamuf, P.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1997a. Politics of Friendship, trans. Collins, G.. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 1997b. Of Grammatology, corrected edn, trans. Spivak, G.. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2000. ‘Et Cetera’, in Deconstructions: a User’s Guide, ed. Royle, Nicholas. New York: Palgrave, 282303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, J. 2001. A Taste for the Secret, trans. Donis, G.. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2005. Sovereignties in Question: The Poetics of Paul Celan. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2011. Voice and Phenomenon, trans. Lawlor, L.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1993. Meditations on First Philosophy, trans. Cress, D.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
DeSouza, N. 2012. ‘Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder’s Critical Reflections on the Principles of Nature and Grace’, The British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4), 773–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devitt, M. 2010. Putting Metaphysics First. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1969–91. The Collected Works of John Dewey: The Early Works, The Middle Works, The Later Works, 37 vols, ed. Boydston, J. A.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dietrich, E. 2010. ‘There Is No Progress in Philosophy’, Essays in Philosophy 12, (2), 9.Google Scholar
Dillon, R. S. 2007. ‘Arrogance, Self-Respect and Personhood’, Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (5-1), 101–26.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1914–. Gesammelte Schriften, 26 vols. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1985. ‘Three Epochs of Modern Aesthetics’, trans. Neville, Michael, in Selected Works, eds Makkreel, R. and Rodi, F., vol. V, Poetry and Experience. Princeton University Press, 175222.Google Scholar
Dilthey, W. 1996. Selected Works, eds Makkreel, R. A. and Rodi, F., vol. IV, Hermeneutics and the Study of History, trans. Nordenhaug, T. et al. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Doris, J., and the Moral Psychology Research Group (eds) 2010. The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, G. 2002. Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Oro, G. 2011. ‘Davidson and the Autonomy of the Human Sciences’, in Dialogues with Davidson: New Perspectives on his Philosophy, ed. Malpas, J.. MIT Press, 283–96.Google Scholar
D’Oro, G. 2012. ‘Reasons and Causes: the Philosophical Battle and the Meta-philosophical War’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2), 207–21.Google Scholar
D’Oro, G. 2015. ‘Unlikely Bedfellows? ‘Collingwood, Carnap and the Internal/External Distinction’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4), 802–17.Google Scholar
D’Oro, G., and Sandis, C. 2013. ‘From Anti-Causalism to Causalism and Back’ in Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Anti-Causalism in The Philosophy of Action, eds D’Oro, G. and Sandis, C.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 748.Google Scholar
Douven, I. 2011. ‘Abduction’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/abduction/>.
Dray, W. H. 1957. Laws and Explanation in History. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dray, W. H. 1963. ‘The Historical Explanation of Actions Reconsidered’, in Philosophy and History, ed. Hook, S.. New York University Press, 105–35.Google Scholar
Drummond, J. 2007. ‘Personal Perspectives’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1), 2844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dummett, M. 1978. ‘Can Analytical Philosophy Be Systematic, and Ought It to Be?’[1975] reprinted in his Truth and Other Enigmas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 437[3n]58.Google Scholar
Dupré, J. 2002. Humans and Other Animals. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, H. 2008. Learning and Memory. New York: Norton.Google ScholarPubMed
Einstein, A. 1950. ‘On the Generalized Theory of Relativity’, Scientific American 182 (4), 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklund, M. 2013. ‘Carnap’s Metaontology’, Nous 47 (2), 229–49.Google Scholar
Eklund, M. 2015. ‘Intuitions, Conceptual Engineering, and Conceptual Fixed Points’, in Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods, ed. Daly, C.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 363–85.Google Scholar
Feltz, A., and Cokely, E. 2009. ‘Do Judgments about Freedom and Responsibility Depend on Who You Are? Personality Differences in Intuitions about Compatibilism and Incompatibilism’, Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1), 342–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feyerabend, P. 1975. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fink, E. 1970. ‘The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism’, in The Phenomenology of Husserl, ed. Elveton, R. O.. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 73147.Google Scholar
Fink, E. 1995. Sixth Cartesian Meditation: The Idea of a Transcendental Theory of Method, trans. Bruzina, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Finlayson, J. G. 2002. ‘Adorno on the Ethical and the Ineffable’, European Journal of Philosophy 10 (1), 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, E., Engelhardt, P. E., and Herbelot, A. 2015. ‘Intuitions and Illusions: From Explanation and Experiment to Assessment’, in Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism, eds Fischer, E. and Collins, J.. London: Routledge, 259–92.Google Scholar
Fleischacker, S. 2013. What is Enlightenment? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 2003. Hume Variations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forst, R. 2015. Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Forster, M. N. 2010. After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forster, P. 2011. Peirce and the Threat of Nominalism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1965. Madness and Civilization, trans. Howard, R.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1994. ‘What Is Enlightenment?’[1984] in The Foucault Reader, ed. Rabinow, P.. New York: Pantheon, 3250.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2001. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, trans. Sheridan, A.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frances, B. forthcoming. ‘The Epistemically Troubling Philosophical Survey’.
Frank, M. 1977. Das individuelle Allgemeine. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Fraser, N. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Frazer, M. L. 2010. The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyenhagen, F. 2013. Adorno’s Practical Philosophy: Living Less Wrongly. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyenhagen, F. 2014. ‘Adorno’s Politics: Theory and Praxis in Germany’s 1960s’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40 (9), 867–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1942. Volk und Geschichte im Denken Herders. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1990. Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1991. Plato’s Dialectical Ethics. Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus, trans. Wallace, R. M.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1994. Truth and Method, trans. Weinsheimer, J. and Marshall, D. G.. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. 1999. Gesammelte Werke. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Garber, D. 1998. ‘Descartes, or the Cultivation of the Intellect’, in Philosophers on Education: Historical Perspectives, ed. Rorty, A. O.. London: Routledge, 124–39.Google Scholar
Gasser, T., et al. 2011. ‘Milestones in PD Genetics’, Movement Disorders 26 (6), 1042–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaukroger, S. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S. 2010. The Collapse of Mechanism and the Rise of Sensibility: Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1680–1760. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerken, M. ms. On Folk Epistemology.
Gettier, E. 1963. ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?Analysis 23, 121–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilson, E. 1967. Etudes sur le rôle de la pensée médiévale dans la formation du système cartésien. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, K. 2006. ‘Hermeneutics and Philology: A Reconsideration of Gadamer’s Critique of Schleiermacher’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1), 133–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjesdal, K. 2008. ‘Between Enlightenment and Romanticism: Some Problems and Challenges in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (2), 285306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjesdal, K. 2009. Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gjesdal, K. 2011. ‘Heidegger, Husserl, and the Cartesian Legacy in Phenomenology’, in Acta Philosophica Fennica. Special issue: Rearticulations of Reason. ed. Haaparanta, L., 117–43.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, K. 2013. ‘A Not Yet Invented Logic: Herder on Bildung, Anthropology, and the Future of Philosophy’, in Die Bildung der Moderne, eds Dreyer, M., Forster, M., Hoffmann, K.-U., and Vieweg, K.. Tübingen: Francke-Verlag, 5369.Google Scholar
Gjesdal, K. 2014. ‘Hermeneutics, Individuality, and Tradition: Schleiermacher’s Idea of Bildung in the Landscape of Hegelian Thought’, in The Relevance of Romanticism, ed. Nassar, Dalia. Oxford University Press, 92109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 1996. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. 2008. What is Analytic Philosophy? Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. 1992a. ‘What is Justified Belief?’ [1979], reprinted in his Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 105–26.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 1992b. ‘Psychology and Philosophical Analysis’ [1989], reprinted in his Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 143–53.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. 2007. ‘Philosophical Intuitions: Their Target, Their Source, and Their Epistemic Status’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 74, 126.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A. 1993. ‘How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. 1987. ‘In Defense of Artificial Intelligence – a Reply to John Searle’, in Mindwaves, eds Blakemore, C. and Greenfield, S. A.. Oxford: Blackwell, 235–44.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. 1981. The Question of Animal Awareness, 2nd edn. New York: Rockefeller University Press.Google Scholar
Haack, S. 1993. Evidence and Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1981a. Philosophisch-politische Profile. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Extended edn[trans. as Philosophical-Political Profiles by F. G. Lawrence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1983].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1981b. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Vol. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung. Vol. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society; Vol. II: Lifeworld and System by T. McCarthy. Boston: Beacon, 1984; 1987].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1982. Zur Logik der Sozialwissenschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1983. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action by C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp [trans. as Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures by F. Lawrence, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987].Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1990. ‘The Hermeneutic Claim to Universality’, trans. Bleicher, J., in The Hermeneutic Tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur, eds Ormiston, G. and Schrift, A. D.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 245–72.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein’s Place in Twentieth Century Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 2007. Human Nature: The Categorial Framework. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. 2014. Interpreting On Certainty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanfling, O. 2000. Philosophy and Ordinary Language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 2001. Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 2011. ‘The Myth of the Given and the Grip of the Given’, Diametros 27, 2546.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 2015a. Cognition, Content, and the A Priori: A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R. 2015b. Kantian Ethics and Human Existence: A Study in Moral Philosophy (unpublished ms, Winter 2015 version), available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/11991023/Kantian_Ethics_and_Human_Existence_A_Study_in_Moral_Philosophy_Winter_2015_version_comments_welcomed>.
Hanna, R. 2015c. Deep Freedom and Real Persons: A Study in Metaphysics (unpublished ms, Fall 2015 version), working draft available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/14493090/Deep_Freedom_and_Real_Persons_A_Study_in_Metaphysics_Fall_2015_version_comments_welcomed>.
Hanna, R. 2016a. ‘Kant, the Copernican Devolution, and Real Metaphysics’, in Kant Handbook, ed. Altman, M.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 2016b. ‘Directions in Space, Non-Conceptual Form, and the Foundations of Transcendental Idealism’, in Kantian Nonconceptualism, ed. Schulting, D.. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hanna, R. 2016c. ‘You Must Reject and Exit the State, For God’s Sake, Or, The Gap Between Right and Virtue in Kant’s Practical Philosophy’ (unpublished ms, Spring 2016 version), available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/24118385/You_Must_Reject_and_Exit_the_State_For_Gods_Sake_Or_The_Gap_Between_Right_and_Virtue_in_Kants_Practical_Philosophy_Spring_2016_version_comments_welcomed>.
Hanna, R., and Chapman, A. 2016. Kant, Agnosticism, and Anarchism: A Theological-Political Treatise (unpublished ms, Spring 2016 version), available online at URL = <www.academia.edu/15300656/Kant_Agnosticism_and_Anarchism_A_Theological-Political_Treatise_Spring_2016_version_comments_welcomed>.
Hanna, R., and Maiese, M. 2009. Embodied Minds in Action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Han-Pile, B. 2002. Foucault’s Critical Project: Between the Transcendental and the Historical. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, M., et al. 2003. ‘Role of Protein Aggregation in Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases’, NeuroMolecular Medicine 4, 2135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haslanger, S. 2012. Resisting Reality. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, M. (ed.) 2014. Philosophical Methods: The Armchair or the Laboratory? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haug, M. C. (ed.) 2014. The Armchair or the Laboratory? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haugeland, J. 1998. Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawking, S., and Mlodinow, L. 2012. The Grand Design. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Haym, R. 1954. Herder, 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1927a. Being and Time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1927b. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1962a. Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1962b. Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, J. and Robinson, E.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1975. Early Greek Thinking, trans. Krell, D. F. and Capuzzi, F. A.. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1976. Wegmarken. Gesamtausgabe, vol. 9. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1982. Basic Problems of Phenomenology, revised. edn, trans. Hofstadter, A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1985a. The History of the Concept of Time: Prologomena, trans. Kisiel, T.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1985b. Phänomenologische Interpretationen zu Aristoteles. Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung, eds Bröcker, W. and Bröcker-Oltmanns, K., Gesamtausgabe, vol. 61. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1994. Einfuhrüng in die Phenomenologische Forschung. Der Beginn der neuzeitlichen Philosophie, Gesamtausgabe, vol. 17. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1995. Phänomenologie des religiösen Lebens, eds Jung, M., Regehly, T., and Strube, C., Gesamtausgabe, vol. 60. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1996. Being and Time, trans. Stambaugh, J.. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1997. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics, 5th edn, enlarged, trans. Taft, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1998. ‘Letter on Humanism’, trans. Capuzzi, F. A., in Pathmarks, ed. McNeill, W.. Cambridge University Press, 239–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2001a. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. Rojcewicz, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2001b. Phenomenological Interpretations of Aristotle: Initiation into Phenomenological Research, trans. Rojcewicz, R.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2004. The Phenomenology of Religious Life, trans. Fritsch, M. and Gosetti-Ferencei, J. A.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2005. Introduction to Phenomenological Research, trans. Dahlstrom, D. O.. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2006. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2010a. Phenomenology of Intuition and Expression, trans. Colony, T.. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. 2010b. Being and Time, trans. Schmidt, D. J.. Albany, NY: The SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Heil, J. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, M., and Clairmont, H.. 2009. ‘Herder’s Epistemology’, in A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder, eds Adler, H. and Koepke, W.. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 4364.Google Scholar
Hempel, C. 1942. ‘The Function of General Laws in History’, Journal of Philosophy 39, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 1887–. Sämtliche Werke, eds Suphan, B. L. et al. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 1985–. Werke in zehn Bänden, eds Arnold, G. et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 1992. Selected Early Works, 1764–1767, eds Menze, E. A. and Menges, K., trans. Menze, E. A. and Palma, M.. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 2002a. Philosophical Writings, ed. and trans. Forster, M. N.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 2002b. Sculpture: Some Observations on Shape and Form from Pygmalion’s Creative Dream, ed. and trans. Gaiger, J.. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herder, J. G. 2006. Selected Writings on Aesthetics, ed. and trans. Moore, G.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herder, J. G. 2008. Shakespeare, ed. and trans. Moore, G.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Herman, L., and Morrel-Samuels, P. 1990. ‘Knowledge Acquisition and Asymmetry Between Language Comprehension and Production: Dolphins and Apes as General Models for Animals’, in Interpretation and Explanation in the Study of Animal Behavior, vol. 1, eds Beckoff, M. and Jamieson, D.. Boulder, CO: Westview, 283312.Google Scholar
Hetherington, S. 2012. ‘The Gettier-illusion: Gettier-partialism and Infallibilism’, Synthese 188, 217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2009. ‘Ontology and Alternative Languages’ in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 231–59. [Reprinted in Hirsch 2011a.]Google Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2011a. Quantifier Variance and Realism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2011b. ‘Quantifier Variance and Realism’, in his Quantifier Variance and Realism. Oxford University Press, 6895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. 2011c. ‘Physical Object Ontology, Verbal Disputes and Common Sense’, in his Quantifier Variance and Realism. Oxford University Press, 144–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, E. C., et al. 2013. ‘Pathogenesis of PD’, Movement Disorders 28 (1), 2430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofweber, T. 2009. ‘Ambitious Yet Modest Metaphysics’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 260–89.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2008. ‘Critical Theory’, in The Routledge Companion to Twentieth Century Philosophy, ed. Moran, D.. London and New York: Routledge, 784813.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2011. Das Recht der Freiheit: Grundriß einer demokratischen Sittlichkeit. Berlin: Suhrkamp [trans. as Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life by J. Ganahl. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014].Google Scholar
Hookway, C. 2000. Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hookway, C. 2012. The Pragmatic Maxim. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horkheimer, M. 1972. Critical Theory: Selected Essays, trans. O’Connell, M. J.. New York: Herder and Herder.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. W. 2002. Dialectic of Enlightenment[1944, 1947] trans. Jephcott, E.. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
Horne, Z., and Livengood, J. 2015. ‘Ordering Effects, Updating Effects, and the Specter of Global Skepticism’, Synthese 130.Google Scholar
Hulatt, O. forthcoming. Adorno’s Theory of Aesthetic and Philosophical Truth: Texture and Performance. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRef
Husserl, E. 1956. Erste Philosophie. 1 Theil, Husserliana VII. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1959. Erste Philosophie (1923/24), Zweiter Teil. Theorie der Phänomenologischen Reduktion. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1962. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology, trans. Gibson, W. R. Boyce. New York: Collier.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1964. The Paris Lectures, trans. Koestenbaum, P.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1970a. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. Carr, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1970b. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. Carr, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1973a. Cartesian Meditations, trans. Cairns, D.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1973b. Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. Husserliana I, ed. Strasser, S.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1976. Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie, Husserliana VI. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1977. Cartesian Meditations, trans. Cairns, D.. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1981. Shorter Works, eds McCormick, P. and Elliston, F.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, trans. Kersten, F.. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. 1988. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, trans. Cairns, D.. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 2006. Späte Texte über Zeitkonstitution (1929–1934). Die C-Manuskripte, ed. Lohmar, D., Husserliana Materialien VIII. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 2014. Ideas 1, trans. Dahlstrom, D. O.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Hutto, D. 2003. Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy: Neither Theory nor Therapy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutto, D. 2009. ‘Philosophical Clarification, its Possibility and Point’, Philosophia 37 (4), 629–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ichikawa, J. 2010. ‘Explaining away Intuitions’, Studia Philosophica Estonica 2, 94116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2005. ‘Why Most Published Research Findings are False’, PLoS Medicine 2 (8 (e124)), 696701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1994. ‘Armchair Metaphysics’, in Philosophy in Mind, Philosophical Studies Series, 60, eds Michaelis, M. and O’Leary Hawthorne, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defence of Conceptual Analysis. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 1998. From Metaphysics to Ethics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, F. 2002. ‘Critical Notice of Knowledge and Its Limits by T. Williamson’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80, 516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 2010. Language, Names, and Information. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. 2011. ‘On Gettier Holdouts’, Mind and Language 26, 468–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, F. forthcoming. ‘In Defence of Reductionism in Ethics’, in Does Anything Really Matter? Parfit on Objectivity, ed. Singer, P.. Oxford University Press.
James, W. 1977. The Writings of William James, ed. McDermott, J. J.. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Janz, B. 2015. ‘Hermeneutics and Intercultural Understanding’, in The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics, eds Malpas, J. and Gander, H.-H.. London: Routledge, 474–85.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. 1998, Adorno – A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Jaspers, K. 1971. Philosophy of Existence, trans. Grabau, R. F.. University of Philadelphia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, A., Dodell-Feder, D., Saxe, R., and Knobe, J. 2014. ‘The Neural Bases of Directed and Spontaneous Mental State Attributions to Group Agents’, PLoS ONE 9 (8), e105341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenner, P., et al. 2013. ‘Parkinson’s Disease – the Debate on the Clinical Phenomenology, Aetiology, Pathology and Pathogenesis’, Journal of Parkinson’s Disease 3, 111.Google ScholarPubMed
Johnson, V. E. 2013. ‘Revised Standards for Statistical Evidence’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (48), 19313–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, K. 2012The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust’, Social Epistemology 26 (2), 237–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, F., Reynolds, J., and Woodward, A. (eds) 2011. Bloomsbury Companion to Existentialism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Joughin, M. 1990. ‘Translator’s Preface’ to G. Deleuze, Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza, trans. Joughin, M.. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. 2006. The Evolution of Morality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A. 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1933. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Smith, N. K., 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1950. Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1964. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals [1785], trans. Paton, H. J.. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1985. Critique of Pure Reason [1781], trans. Smith, N. K.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1992a. ‘On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and Intelligible World (Inaugural Dissertation)’, in Immanuel Kant: Theoretical Philosophy: 1755–1770. Cambridge University Press, 373416.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1992b. ‘The Jäsche Logic’, trans. Young, J. M., in Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Logic. Cambridge University Press, 519640.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1996a. ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’’ trans. Gregor, M., in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 1722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996b. ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals’, trans. Gregor, M., in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 37108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1996c. ‘Critique of Practical Reason’, trans. Gregor, M., in Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 139272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1997. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason, trans. and eds Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 1999. Immanuel Kant: Correspondence, trans. Zweig, A.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment, trans. Guyer, P. and Matthews, E.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, trans. Hatfield, G.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. 2007a. ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’, trans. Wood, A., in Immanuel Kant: Anthropology, History, and Education. Cambridge University Press, 107–20.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 2007b. ‘The Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Aim’, in Anthropology, History and Education, eds Zoller, G. and Loundon, R.. Cambridge University Press, 107–20.Google Scholar
Kekes, J. 1980. The Nature of Philosophy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Kelletat, A. F. 1984. Herder und die Weltliteratur. Zur Geschichte des Übersetzens im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. (ed.) 1994. Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas Debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2016) ‘Disagreement in Philosophy: Its Epistemic Significance’, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, eds Cappelen, H., Szabó, T. S., and Hawthorne, J.. Oxford University Press, 374–94.Google Scholar
Kelly, T., and McGrath, S. forthcoming. ‘Are there any Successful Philosophical Arguments?’ in Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes from van Inwagen, ed. Keller, J.. Oxford University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. 1985. Philosophical Fragments and Johannes Climacus, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, M., and Yuan, Y. 2015. ‘No Cross-cultural Differences in the Gettier Car Case Intuition: A Replication Study of Weinberg et al. 2001’, Episteme 12 (3), 355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisiel, T. 1993. The Genesis of Heidegger’s Being and Time. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1978. ‘Theories, Theorists and Theoretical Change’, Philosophical Review 87, 519–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitcher, P. 1983. The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, P., and Brown, E. 2013. ‘Cosmopolitanism’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2013 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2013/entries/cosmopolitanism>.
Knobe, J. 2010. ‘Person as Scientist, Person as Moralist’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33, 315–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knobe, J. 2016. ‘Experimental Philosophy is Cognitive Science’, in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, eds Systma, J. and Buckwalter, W.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 3752.Google Scholar
Knobe, J., and Nichols, S. (eds) 2008. Experimental Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Koopman, C. 2009. Pragmatism as Transition: Historicity and Hope in James, Dewey, and Rorty. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 1998. ‘The Role of Intuition in Philosophical Theorizing’, in Rethinking Intuition, eds DePaul, M. and Ramsey, W.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 129–41.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2002. Knowledge and its Place in Nature. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2006. ‘Appeals to Intuition and the Ambitions of Epistemology’, in Epistemology Futures, ed. Hetherington, S.. Oxford University Press, 1025.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2007. ‘How to Refer to Artifacts’, in Creations of the Mind: Essays on Artifacts and their Representations, eds Margolis, E. and Laurence, S.. Oxford University Press, 138–49.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2009. ‘Review of The Philosophy of Philosophy by T. Williamson’, Analysis 69, 109–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2012. On Reflection. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornblith, H. 2014. ‘Is There Room for Armchair Theorizing in Epistemology’, in Philosophical Methods: The Armchair or the Laboratory?, ed. Haug, M. C.. London: Routledge, 195216.Google Scholar
Kornblith, H. forthcoming. ‘Philosophy, Science, and Common Sense’, in Scientism, eds Peels, R. and van Woudenberg, R.. Oxford University Press.
Korsgaard, C. M. C. 1983. ‘Two Distinctions in Goodness’, The Philosophical Review 92 (2), 169–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, A. C., and Malenka, R. C.. 2008. ‘Striatal Plasticity and Basal Ganglia Circuit Function’, Neuron 60, 543–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kriegel, U. 2013. ‘The Epistemological Challenge of Revisionary Metaphysics’, Philosopher’s Imprint 13 (12), 130.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. 1980a. Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. 1980b. Naming and Necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kroon, F. 1987. ‘Causal Descriptivism’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropotkin, P. 1910. ‘Anarchism’, Encyclopedia Britannica [1910], available online at URL = <www.marxists.org/reference/archive/kropotkin-peter/1910/britannica.htm>.
Kuehn, M. 1987. Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd enlarged edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kukla, R. 2002. ‘The Ontology and Temporality of Conscience’, Continental Philosophy Review 35, 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1999. Social Psychology: Making Sense of People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, M. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackey, J. 2014. ‘Socially Extended Knowledge’, Philosophical Issues 24 (1), 282–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, J. W., et al. 1983. ‘Chronic Parkinsonism in Humans Due to a Product of Meperidine-analog Synthesis’, Science 219, 979–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. 2002. ‘Attending to Reasons’, in Reading McDowell on Mind and World, ed. Smith, N.. New York: Routledge, 4766.Google Scholar
Lawlor, L. 2003. Thinking through French Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lawlor, L. 2016. From Violence to Speaking out. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Lazerowitz, M. 1970. ‘A Note on “Metaphilosophy”’, Metaphilosophy 1, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, I. 1991. The Fixation of Belief and its Undoing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, C. I. 1923. ‘A Pragmatic Conception of the A Priori’, The Journal of Philosophy 20, 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. 1986. On the Plurality of Worlds. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. 1990. ‘Noneism or Allism’, Mind 99, 2331.Google Scholar
Lewy, F. J. 1912. ‘Paralysis agitans. I. Pathologische Anatomie’, in Handbuch der Neurologie, ed. Lewandowski, M.. Berlin: Springer, 920–33.Google Scholar
Liao, S. M., Wiegmann, A., Alexander, J., and Vong, G. 2012. ‘Putting the Trolley in Order: Experimental Philosophy and the Loop Case’, Philosophical Psychology 25 (5), 661–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, D. 2011. Human Learning and Memory. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipton, P. 1991. Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1964. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding[1690]. Glasgow: Collins and Sons.Google Scholar
Lowe, J. 1998. The Possibility of Metaphysics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macarthur, D. 2014. ‘Cavell on Skepticism and the Importance of Not-Knowing’, Conversations: The Journal of Cavellian Studies 2, 223.Google Scholar
Macarthur, D. forthcoming. ‘The Ethical Significance of Metaphysical Quietism: Remarks on the Wittgenstein–Malcolm Incident Involving an Alleged British Plot to Kill Hitler’, in Later Wittgenstein Now, ed. Malachowski, A.. London: Blackwell.
Machery, E. 2011. ‘Thought Experiments and Philosophical Knowledge’, Metaphilosophy 42 (3), 191214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. 2012. ‘Expertise and Intuitions about Reference’, THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (1), 3754.Google Scholar
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nicols, S., and Stich, S. P. 2004. ‘Semantics, Cross-Cultural Style’, Cognition 92, B1B12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E., Sytsma, J., and Deutsch, M. 2015. ‘Speaker’s Reference and Cross-Cultural Semantics’ in On Reference, ed. Bianchi, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 6276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., Chatterjee, A., Karasawa, K., Struchiner, N., Sirker, S., Usui, N., and Hashimoto, T. forthcoming-a. ‘Gettier was Framed!’ in Epistemology for the Rest of the World: Linguistic and Cultural Diversity and Epistemology, eds McCready, E., Mizumoto, M., Stanley, J. and Stich, S.. Oxford University Press.
Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., Chatterjee, A., Karasawa, K., Struchiner, N., Sirker, S., Usui, N., and Hashimoto, T. forthcoming-b. ‘Gettier across Cultures’, Noûs.
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Maddy, P. 2007. Second Philosophy: A Naturalistic Method. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magee, B. 1982. Talking Philosophy: Dialogues with Fifteen Leading Philosophers. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 2001. Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Memoir. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malpas, J., and Gander, H.-H. (eds) 2015. The Routledge Companion to Hermeneutics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manley, D. 2009. ‘Introduction: A Guided Tour of Metametaphysics’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 137.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. 2009. ‘Philosophie und Kritische Theorie’ [1937], in his Negations: Essays in Critical Theory, trans. Shapiro, J. J.. London: MayFlyBooks, 99118.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. 1956–90. Marx Engels Werke[MEW]. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.Google Scholar
Marx, K., and Engels, F. 1975–2005. Marx Engels Collected Works[MECW]. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
Matthews, G. B. 1992. Thought’s Ego in Augustine and Descartes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mattson, M. P., and Liu, D. 2002. ‘Energetics and Oxidative Stress in Synaptic Plasticity and Neurodegenerative Disorders’, NeuroMolecular Medicine 2, 215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayo, R. S. 1969. Herder and the Beginnings of Comparative Literature. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Mazzoni, P., et al. 2007. ‘Why Don’t We Move Faster? Parkinson’s Disease, Movement Vigor, and Implicit Motivation’, The Journal of Neuroscience 27 (27), 7105–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, T. 1985. ‘Complexity and Democracy, or the Seducements of Systems Theory’, New German Critique 35, 2753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, T. 1990. ‘The Critique of Impure Reason: Foucault and the Frankfurt School’, Political Theory 18 (3), 437–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. 1996. Mind and World. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 1994. Mind and World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2002. ‘Reply to Larmore’, in Reading McDowell on Mind and World, ed. Smith, N.. New York: Routledge, 294–6.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. 2009. ‘Wittgensteinian Quietism’, Common Knowledge 15 (3), 365–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, C. 1993. Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. 2002. The Making of a Philosopher: My Journey Through Twentieth Century Philosophy. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
McManus, D. 2013. ‘The Provocation to Look and See: Appropriation, Recollection, and Formal Indication’, in Wittgenstein and Heidegger, eds Egan, D., Reynolds, S., and Wendland, A.. London: Routledge, 5065.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1998. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Smith, C.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2008. Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Landes, D.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merricks, T. 2000. ‘No Statues’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (1), 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misak, C. 1991. Truth and the End of Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, C. 1995. Verificationism: Its History and Prospects. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Misak, C. 2013. The American Pragmatists. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. W. 1997. Points of View. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, A. W. 2012. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1955. ‘Notes on Wittgenstein’s Lectures, 1930–33’, Mind 64 (253), 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, R. 2001. Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. L. 1894. An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. London: Walter Scott.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nado, J. 2014. ‘Philosophical Expertise’, Philosophy Compass 9, 631–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nado, J. 2015. ‘Intuition, Philosophical Theorizing, and the Threat of Skepticism’, in Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism, eds Fischer, E. and Collins, J.. London: Routledge, 204–21.Google Scholar
Nagel, J. 2012. ‘Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85, 495527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, S., Pinillos, N., and Mallon, R. 2016. ‘Ambiguous Reference’, Mind 125 (497), 145–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 1974. The Gay Science: With a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs, ed. Kaufmann, W. A.. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Nisbet, H. B. 1970. Herder and the Philosophy and History of Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R.E., and Wilson, T.D. 1977. ‘Telling More than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes’, Psychological Review 84 (3), 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, A. (ed.) 2007. ‘Special Issue on Dennett and Heterophenomenology’, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (1–2), 1270.Google Scholar
Nolan, D. 2015. ‘The A Posteriori Armchair’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93, 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, R. E. 1991. Herder’s Aesthetics and the European Enlightenment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1981a. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. 1981b. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Overgaard, S., Gilbert, P., and Burwood, S. 2013. An Introduction to Metaphilosophy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagin, P. forthcoming. ‘Problems with Norms of Assertion’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, DOI: 10.1111/phpr.12209.
Papineau, D. 2009. ‘The Poverty of Analysis’, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. 1817. An Essay on the Shaking Palsy. London: Sherwood, Neely, and Jones.Google ScholarPubMed
Paul, L. A. 2014. Transformative Experiences. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1931. Collected Papers, Vol. II, ed. Hartshorne, C. and Weiss, P.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1931–58. The Collected Works of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1934. Collected Papers, Vol. V, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1955. ‘The Fixation of Belief’, in Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, J.. New York: Dover, 522.Google Scholar
Petit, J.-L. (dir.) 2015. ‘La naturalisation de la phénoménologie 20 ans après’, Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg, 38.Google Scholar
Petitot, J., Varela, F., Pachoud, B., and Roy, J.-M. (eds) 1999. Naturalizing Phenomenology: Issues in Contemporary Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Petitot, J., et al. (eds) 1999. Naturalizing Phenomenology. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2004. ‘Existentialism, Quietism, and the Role of Philosophy’, in The Future of Philosophy, ed. Leiter, B.. London: Routledge, 304–27.Google Scholar
Philp, M. 2013. ‘William Godwin’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition), ed. Zalta, E. N., available online at URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/godwin/>.
Piercey, R. 2003. ‘Doing Philosophy Historically’, Review of Metaphysics 56 (June), 815–36.Google Scholar
Piercey, R. 2009a. The Crisis in Continental Philosophy: History, Truth and the Hegelian Legacy. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Piercey, R. 2009b. The Uses of the Past From Heidegger to Rorty: Doing Philosophy Historically. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piercey, R. 2010. ‘Metaphilosophy as First Philosophy’, International Philosophical Quarterly 50 (3) (September), 335–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plant, B. 2012. ‘Philosophical Diversity and Disagreement’, Metaphilosophy 43 (5), 567–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, , 1927. Charmides, Alcibiades 1 and 2 Hipparchus, the Lovers, Theages, Minos, Epinomis; with an English Translation, trans. Lamb, W. R. M., ed. Page, T. E.. Vol. 201, Loeb Classical Library. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Plato, , 1971. Gorgias, trans. Hamilton, W.. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Plato, , 1981. Meno, trans. Grube, G. M. A., in Five Dialogues. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Pleasants, N. 1999. Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, D. 2015. ‘Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and the Methodology of Philosophy’, Inquiry 58 (7–8), 828–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plunkett, D., and Sundell, T. (2013). ‘Disagreement and the Semantics of Normative and Evaluative Terms’, Philosopher’s Imprint 13 (23), 137.Google Scholar
Polymeropoulos, M. H., et al. 1997. ‘Mutation in the α-Synuclein Gene Identified in Families with Parkinson’s Disease’, Science 276, 2045–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Popper, K. R. 1968. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1975. ‘How I See Philosophy’, in The Owl of Minerva: Philosophers on Philosophy, eds Bontempo, C. J. and Odell, S. J.. New York: McGraw-Hill, 4155.Google Scholar
Prado, C. (ed.) 2003. A House Divided: Comparing Analytic and Continental Philosophy. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Price, H. 2003. ‘Truth as Convenient Friction’, Journal of Philosophy 100, 167–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. 2004. ‘Naturalism Without Representationalism’, in Naturalism in Question, ed. Macarthur, D. and de Caro, M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 7188.Google Scholar
Price, H. 2009. ‘Metaphysics after Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks?’ in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 320–47.Google Scholar
Price, H. 2011. Naturalism Without Mirrors. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pust, J. 2000. Intuitions as Evidence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975a. ‘The Meaning of ‘Meaning’, in his Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, 215–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975b. Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975c. Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975d. Philosophical Papers (Vol. 1): Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1987. The Many Faces of Realism. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1995. ‘Pragmatism’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 95, 291306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, H. 1997. ‘A Half Century of Philosophy’, Daedalus 12, 175208.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 2012. Philosophy in an Age of Science: Physics, Mathematics and Skepticism, eds De Caro, M. and Macarthur, D.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1951. ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in his From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2046.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1966. ‘Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory’ [1953], reprinted in his The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. ‘Epistemology Naturalized’, in his Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. 1970. ‘Philosophical Progress in Language Theory’, Metaphilosophy 1, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V., and Ullian, J. S. 1978. The Web of Belief, 2nd edn. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, M. 2009. ‘The Phenomenology of Mood and the Meaning of Life’, in Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, ed. Goldie, P.. Oxford University Press, 349–72.Google Scholar
Reeves, A., et al. 2014. ‘Ageing and Parkinson’s Disease: Why is Advancing Age the Biggest Risk Factor?Ageing Research Reviews 14, 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reill, P. H. 2005. Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berkeley: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
Renaudie, P.-J. 2013. ‘Me, Myself and I: Sartre and Husserl on Elusiveness of the Self’, Continental Philosophy Review 46 (1), 99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renaudie, P.-J. 2015. ‘A Pebble at the Bottom of the Water. Sartre and Cavell on Self-knowledge’, in Pre-reflective Consciousness: Sartre and Contemporary Philosophy of Mind, eds Miguens, S., Preyer, G., and Morando, C. B.. London: Routledge, 208–24.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1973. Conceptual Idealism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1978. ‘Philosophical Disagreement: An Essay Towards Orientational Pluralism in Metaphilosophy’, Review of Metaphysics 32 (2), 217–51.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1985. The Strife of Systems. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1992. A System of Pragmatic Idealism, 3 vols. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. 1994. Metaphilosophical Inquiries. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 2000. Standardism: An Empirical Approach to Philosophical Methodology, University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 2001. Philosophical Reasoning. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 2006a. Studies in Metaphilosophy. Frankfurt: Ontos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rescher, N. 2006b. Philosophical Dialectics: An Essay on Metaphilosophy. Frankfurt: Ontos.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 2014. Philosophical Progress: And Other Philosophical Studies. Boston: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. 1974. ‘Freedom in the Light of Hope’, trans. Sweeney, Robert, in The Conflict of Interpretations, ed. Ihde, D.. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 402–24.Google Scholar
Rilke, R. M. 1989. The Selected Poetry of Rainer Maria Rilke, ed. and trans. Mitchell, S.. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Romdenh-Romluc, K. 2011. ‘Time for Consciousness: Intention and Introspection’, Phenomenology and Cognitive Sciences 10, 369–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1984. ‘The Historiography of Philosophy: Four Genres’, in Philosophy in History, eds Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q.. Cambridge University Press, 4975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, Irony, Solidarity. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, R. 1999. ‘Trotsky and the Wild Orchids’, in his Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 2007. Philosophy as Cultural Politics: Philosophical Papers Volume 4. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. 1959. Wisdom of the West, ed. Foulkes, P.. London: Rathbone.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1967. The Problems of Philosophy. [1912] Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1970. ‘Autobiographical’, in Ryle, eds Wood, O. P. and Pitcher, G.. New York: Doubleday and Co, 115.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1971. Collected Essays. Vol II. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 2009. Collected Papers, Volume 2: Collected Essays 1929–1968. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sacks, M. 2005. ‘The Nature of Transcendental Arguments’, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (4), 439–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salamone, J. D., et al. 2007. ‘Effort-related Functions of Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine and Associated Forebrain Circuits’, Psychopharmacology 191, 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J.-P. 1958. Being and Nothingness, trans. Barnes, H.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sartwell, C. 1991. ‘Knowledge is Merely True Belief’, American Philosophical Quarterly, 157–65.Google Scholar
Scarre, G. 2007. Death. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Schear, J. K. (ed.) 2013. Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S., Mace, C. A., and Stocks, J. L. 1933. ‘Symposium: Must Philosophers Disagree?Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 12, 118–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, E., Cokely, E., and Feltz, A. 2011. ‘Persistent Bias in Expert Judgments about Free Will and Moral Responsibility: A Test of the Expertise Defense’, Consciousness and Cognition 20, 1722–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwitzgebel, E., and Cushman, F. 2015. ‘Philosophers’ Biased Judgments Persist Despite Training, Expertise and Reflection’, Cognition 141, 127–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwitzgebel, E., and Rust, J. 2014. ‘The Moral Behavior of Ethics Professors: Relationships among Self-reported Behavior, Expressed Normative Attitude, and Directly Observed Behavior’, Philosophical Psychology 27 (3), 293327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seel, M. 2004. Adornos Philosophie der Kontemplation. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Sellars, J. 2011. The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy, 2nd edn. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1956. ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind’ in Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I, eds Feigl, H. and Scriven, M.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 253329.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1963. Science, Perception, and Reality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. 1991. Science, Perception, and Reality. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview.Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus 1994. Outlines of Scepticism, trans. and eds Barnes, J., and Annas, J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. 2010. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shieber, J. 2012. ‘A Partial Defense of Intuition on Naturalist Grounds’, Synthese 187, 321–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shope, R. 1983. The Analysis of Knowledge: A Decade of Research. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sider, T. 2011. Writing the Book of the World. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skirke, C. 2012. ‘Metaphysical Experience and Constitutive Error in Adorno’s “Meditations on Metaphysics”’, Inquiry 55 (3), 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J. J. C. 1993. ‘Why Philosophers Disagree’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (supp 1), 6782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A. 1993. The Wealth of Nations [first published 1776; 5th edn 1789]. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. (ed.) 2002. Reading McDowell on Mind and World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sosa, E. 2007. ‘Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition’, Philosophical Studies 132 (1), 99107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sosa, E. 2008. ‘Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition’, in Experimental Philosophy, eds Knobe, J. and Nichols, S.. Oxford University Press, 231–40.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. de 2002a. Ethics, in his Spinoza: Complete Works, ed. Morgan, M. L. and trans. Shirley, S.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. de 2002b. Theological-Political Treatise, in his Spinoza: Complete Works, ed. Morgan, M. L. and trans. Shirley, S.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K., and West, R. 2007. ‘Natural Myside Bias is Independent of Cognitive Bbility’, Thinking & Reasoning 13 (3), 225–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starzak, T. 2016. ‘Interpretations without Justification’, Synthese, 121.Google Scholar
Stern, D. G. 2004. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, J. 2003. Kierkegaard’s Relation to Hegel Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stich, S. 1990. The Fragmentation of Reason: Preface to a Pragmatic Theory of Cognitive Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stich, S. 2013. ‘Do Different Groups Have Different Epistemic Intuitions? A Reply to Jennifer Nagel’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87, 151–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stirner, M. 1982. The Ego and His Own, ed. Martin, J. J. and trans. Byington, S. T.. Sun City: West World Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, P. 2010. Kierkegaard’s Mirrors: Narrative, Self, and Moral Vision. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Methuen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1963. ‘Carnap’s Views on Constructed Systems vs. Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy’, in The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, ed. Schilpp, P. A.. Illinois: Open Court, 503–18.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1992. Analysis and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, G. 2009. Selves: An Essay in Revisionary Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 2011. Philosophical Writings, eds Strawson, G. and Montague, M.. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strohminger, N., and Nichols, S. 2014. ‘The Essential Moral Self’, Cognition 131, 159–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sunstein, C. R. 2005. ‘Moral Heuristics’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4), 531–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, S., Alexander, J., and Weinberg, J. 2008. ‘The Instability of Philosophical Intuitions: Running Hot and Cold on Truetemp’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1), 138–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szubka, T. 2010. ‘Richard Rorty and the Analytic Tradition: Radical Break or Partial Continuity?’, Diametros 25 (September), 146–58.Google Scholar
Talbot, B. 2013. ‘Reforming Intuition Pumps: When are the Old Ways the Best?Philosophical Studies 165 (2), 315–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, R. B. 2001. ‘A Pragmatist Critique of Rorty’s Hopeless Politics’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 39 (4), 611–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talisse, R. B. 2007. A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B. 2012. Pluralism and Liberal Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Talisse, R. B., and Aikin, S. F. 2008. Pragmatism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tanesini, A. 2004. Wittgenstein: A Feminist Interpretation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tanesini, A. 2015. ‘Nietzsche on the Diachronic Will and the Problem of Morality’, European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3), 652–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanesini, A. 2016. ‘“Calm Down Dear”: Intellectual Arrogance, Silencing and Ignorance’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 90, 7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. 1984. ‘Philosophy and its History’, in Philosophy in History, eds Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Q.. Cambridge University Press, 1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. 1995. ‘The Importance of Herder’, in his Philosophical Arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 79100.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A. 2001. ‘Geographic Objects and the Science of Geography’. Topoi 20, 149–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. 2007a. Ordinary Objects. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. 2007b. ‘Modal Normativism and the Methods of Metaphysics’, Philosophical Topics 35 (1&2), 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A. 2009. ‘Answerable and Unanswerable Questions’, in Metametaphysics, eds Chalmers, D., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R.. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 444–71.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. 2012. ‘Experimental Philosophy and the Methods of Ontology’, The Monist 95 (2), 175200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. 2013. ‘The Nancy D. Simco Lecture: Norms and Necessity’, Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (2), 143–60.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. 2015. Ontology Made Easy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomasson, A. L. 2016. ‘Metaphysical Disputes and Metalinguistic Negotiation’, in Analytic Philosophy. doi:10.1111/phib.12087.Google Scholar
Tobia, K., Buckwalter, W., and Stich, S. 2013. ‘Moral Intuitions: Are Philosophers Experts?Philosophical Psychology 26 (5), 629–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., and Call, J. 1997. Primate Cognition. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Toulmin, S. 1992. Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Travis, C. 2013. Perception: Essays After Frege. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turri, J. 2014. ‘Problem of ESEE Knowledge’, Ergo 1, http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0001.004Google Scholar
Turri, J. 2016. ‘Knowledge Judgments in Gettier Cases’, in A Companion to Experimental Philosophy, eds Systma, J. and Buckwalter, W.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 337–48.Google Scholar
Unger, P. 1979a. ‘There Are No Ordinary Things’, Synthese 41 (2), 117–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. 1979b. ‘Why There Are No People’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4 (1), 177222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unger, P. 2014. Empty Ideas: A Critique of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 1990. Material Beings. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 2004. ‘Freedom to Break the Laws’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1), 334–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Inwagen, P. 2008. ‘How to Think about the Problem of Free Will’, Journal of Ethics 12 (3/4), 327–41.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D. 2006. Self to Self: Selected Essays. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ward, P. 1995. ‘Madam Guyon in America: An Annotated Bibliography’, Bulletin of Bibliography 52 (2), 107.Google Scholar
Weigel, C. 2011. ‘Distance, Anger, Freedom: An Account of the Role of Abstraction in Compatibilist and Incompatibilist Intuitions’, Philosophical Psychology 24 (6), 803–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J. 2007. ‘How to Challenge Intuitions Empirically without Risking Skepticism’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31, 318–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J. 2015. ‘The Methodological Necessity of Experimental Philosophy’, Discipline Filosofiche 25, 2342.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. forthcoming. ‘Knowledge, Noise, and Curve-fitting. A Methodological Argument for JTB?’ in Explaining Knowledge: New Essays on the Gettier Problem, eds Borges, R., de Almeida, C., and Klein, P.. Oxford University Press.
Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. 2001. ‘Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions’, Philosophical Topics 29, 429–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinberg, J., Alexander, J., Gonnerman, C., and Reuter, S. 2012. ‘Restrictionism and Reflection: Challenge Deflected, or Simply Redirected?The Monist 95, 200–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellek, R. 1981. A History of Modern Criticism 1750–1950, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westerlund, F. 2014. Heidegger and the Problem of Phenomenality, Philosophical Studies from the University of Helsinki, vol. 45.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. 2000. Deconstruction as Analytic Philosophy. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wichmann, T., et al. 2011. ‘Milestones in Research on the Pathophysiology of Parkinson’s Disease’, Movement Disorders 26 (6), 1032–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiggershaus, R. 1994. The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories and Political Significance [1986], trans. Robertson, M.. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1993. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2003. ‘Contemporary Philosophy: A Second Look’, in The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, eds Bunnin, N. and Tsui-James, E. P.. Oxford: Blackwell, 2334.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2006. Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, ed. Moore, A. W.. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2006a. ‘The Human Prejudice’, in his Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, ed. Moore, A. W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2006b. ‘Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline’, reprinted in his Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, ed. Moore, A. W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2006c. ‘What Might Philosophy Become’, in his Philosophy as a Humanistic Discipline, ed. Moore, A. W.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2006d. ‘Wittgenstein and Idealism’, reprinted in his The Sense of the Past: Essays in the History of Philosophy, ed. Burnyeat, M.. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2006e. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 2014. ‘What Hope for the Humanities?’ reprinted in his Essays and Reviews 1959–2002. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M. 2004. ‘Is Knowledge a Natural Phenomenon?’ in The Externalist Challenge, ed. Schantz, R.. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 193209.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 2000. Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Williamson, T. 2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, T. 2013. Modal Logic as Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. 2002. Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wise, R. A. 1985. ‘The Anhedonia Hypothesis: Mark III’, Behavioral Brain Science 8, 178–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Withy, K. 2013. ‘The Strategic Unity of Heidegger’s The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics’, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 51, 161–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical Investigations [1953], trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1961a. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuiness, B. F.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1961b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], trans. and eds McGuiness, B. and Pears, D.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1963. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F.. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1967a. Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1967b. Zettel, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1969a. The Blue and the Brown Books, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1969b. On Certainty, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. and Paul, Denis. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1993. Philosophical Occasions: 1912–1951, eds Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. London: Hackett.Google Scholar
Woolgar, S. 1988. Knowledge and Reflexivity. London and Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Wright, C. 2001. Rails to Infinity: Essays on Themes from Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Investigations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C. 2010. ‘On Intuitional Stability: The Clear, the Strong, and the Paradigmatic’, Cognition 115 (3), 491503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yablo, S. 2002. ‘Coulda, Woulda, Shoulda’, in Conceivability and Possibility, eds Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J.. Oxford University Press, 441–92.Google Scholar
Yin, H. H., and Knowlton, B. J. 2006. ‘The Role of the Basal Ganglia in Habit Formation’, Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, 464–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zahavi, D. 2005. Subjectivity and Selfhood: Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. (ed.) 2013. Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. 2015. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. 2016. ‘The End of What? Phenomenology and Speculative Realism’, forthcoming in International Journal of Philosophical Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zammito, J. H. 2002. Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar