Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T17:45:51.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2023

Keegan Francis Callanan
Affiliation:
Middlebury College, Vermont
Sharon Ruth Krause
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, John. The Adams-Jefferson Letters, ed. Cappon, Lester J.. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Albertone, Manuela. “Thomas Jefferson and French Economic Thought.” In Rethinking the Atlantic World: Europe and America in the Age of Democratic Revolutions, ed. Albertone, Manuela and De Francesco, Antonio. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009: 123–46.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. Montesquieu, la politique et l’histoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1959.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Le Livre des Politiques d’Aristote. Trans. Oresme, Nicole, 1374.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . Les Politiques d’Aristote. Trans. Le Roy, Loys, 1568.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Les étapes de la pensée sociologique. Paris: Gallimard, 1967.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. London: Penguin, 1968.Google Scholar
Baker, Keith. Inventing the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Barbon, Nicolas. A Discourse of Trade. London: Thomas Milbourn, 1690.Google Scholar
Barrera, Guillaume. “Malebranche.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Barrière, Pierre. Un grand provincial: Charles-Louis de Secondat baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu. Bordeaux: Delmas, 1946.Google Scholar
Bart, Jean. “Montesquieu et l’unification du droit.” In Le temps de Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 Octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: 137–46.Google Scholar
Bartlett, Robert. The Idea of Enlightenment: A Postmortem Study. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Bates, David William. States of War: Enlightenment Origins of the Political. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Becker, Carl L. The Heavenly City of the Eighteenth-Century Philosophers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1932.Google Scholar
Bell, David. The Cult of the Nation in France: Inventing Nationalism, 1680–1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Benrekassa, Georges. “Le problème des sources dans les Considérations: questions de méthode.” In Storia e ragione, ed. Postigliola, Alberto. Naples: Liguori, 1987: 3346.Google Scholar
Benrekassa, Georges. “Freedom.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. “Montesquieu.” In Against the Current, ed. Hardy, Henry. London: Random House, 1979: 164–203.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher J. The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Beyer, Charles-Jacques. “Montesquieu et la censure religieuse de L’Esprit des lois.” Revue des sciences humaines 70 (1953): 105–131.Google Scholar
Blaufarb, Rafe. The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Lorenzo. “Histoire et nature: la religion dans l’Esprit des Lois.” In Le temps de Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 Octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michael and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: 289304.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Lorenzo. “Modération non sans tentations radicales: le cas de Montesquieu.” In Lumières radicales et le politique, ed. García-Alonso, Marta. Paris: Champion, 2017: 342–54.Google Scholar
Binoche, Bertrand. Introduction à “De l’Esprit des lois” de Montesquieu. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar
Black, Jeremy. Natural and Necessary Enemies: Anglo-French Relations in the Eighteenth Century. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Blanning, Timothy C. W. The Culture of Power and the Power of Culture: Old Regime Europe 1660–1789. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Blaufarb, Rafe. The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodin, Jean. The Six Bookes of a Commonweale, ed. Douglas McRae, Kenneth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Boulainvilliers, Henri comte de. Histoire de l’ancien gouvernement de la France. Amsterdam: La Haye, 1727.Google Scholar
Boulainvilliers, Henri comte de. Essais sur la noblesse de France, contenant une dissertation sur son origine et abaissement. Amsterdam:1732.Google Scholar
Braun, Theodore. “‘La Chaîne secrète’: A Decade of Interpretations.” French Studies 42, no. 3 (1988): 278–91.Google Scholar
Brewer, Daniel. “Thinking History through Montesquieu.” In Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002: 215–33.Google Scholar
Bromwich, David. The Intellectual Life of Edmund Burke. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Brunet, Pierre-Gustave. Fantaisies bibliographiques. Paris: Jules Gay, 1864.Google Scholar
Burke, Peter. The Fabrication of Louis XIV. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Burson, Jeffrey D. Culture of Enlightening: Abbé Claude Yvon and the Entangled Emergence of the Enlightenment. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Callanan, Keegan. Montesquieu’s Liberalism and the Problem of Universal Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Carcassonne, Elie. Montesquieu et le problème de la constitution française au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1927.Google Scholar
Carrese, Paul O. The Cloaking of Power: Montesquieu, Blackstone, and the Rise of Judicial Activism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Carrese, Paul O. Democracy in Moderation: Montesquieu, Tocqueville and Sustainable Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “Introduction.” In Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws: A Compendium of the First English Edition, ed. Wallace Carrithers, David. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977: 388.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “Jansenist and Jesuit Censures of The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws: A Compendium of the First English Edition, ed. Carrithers, David Wallace. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977: 467–68.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “Not So Virtuous Republics: Montesquieu, Venice, and the Theory of Aristocratic Republicanism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 52, no. 2 (1991): 245–68.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “The Enlightenment Science of Society.” In Inventing Human Science: Eighteenth-Century Domains, ed. Rox, Christopher, Porter, Roy and Wokler, Robert. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995: 232–70.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “Democratic and Aristocratic Republics: Ancient and Modern.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 109–58.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “Introduction: An Appreciation of The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on the Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 140.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. “Montesquieu and the Liberal Philosophy of Jurisprudence.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 291334.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick, eds. Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002.Google Scholar
Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A., eds. Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.Google Scholar
Denis de, Casabianca. “Des objections sans réponses? À propos de la ‘tentation’ matérialiste de Montesquieu dans le Pensées.” Revue Montesquieu 7 (2003–2004): 135–56Google Scholar
Casabianca, Dénis de. “Descartes.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Lyon: ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. The Philosophy of the Enlightenment. Boston: Beacon Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Chaussinand-Nogaret, Guy. La noblesse au XVIIIe siècle: De la féodalité aux lumières. Paris: Librairie Hachette, 1976.Google Scholar
Chaussinand-Nogaret, Guy. The French Nobility in the Eighteenth Century: From Feudalism to Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, Paul. “Lumières Écossaises.” Dictionnaire Montesquieu [online], ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Cheney, Paul. Revolutionary Commerce: Globalization and the French Monarchy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Cheney, Paul. “Commerce.” In The Cambridge Companion to the French Enlightenment, ed. Brewer, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014: 4459.Google Scholar
Churchill, Winston S. Marlborough: His Life and Times. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2002.Google Scholar
Cicero, . On Duties, ed. Griffin, Miriam T. and Atkins, E. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Clark, Henry C. Compass of Society: Commerce and Absolutism in Old-Regime France. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2006.Google Scholar
Claus, Laurence. “Montesquieu’s Mistakes and the True Meaning of Separation.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25, no. 3 (2005): 419–51.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. Réflexions sur l’esclavage des nègres. Neuchatel: 1781.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. Bibliothèque de l’Homme Public. Paris: 1790–2.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. “Observations on the Thirty-First Book.” In Destutt de Tracy, A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws, to Which Are Annexed, Observations on the Thirty First Book by the Late M. Condorcet; and Two Letters of Helvetius, on the Merits of the Same Work. Trans. Thomas Jefferson. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811: 259–60.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Jean Antoine Nicolas de Caritat. “Essay on the Constitution and Functions of the Provincial Assemblies.” In Selected Writings, ed. Baker, Keith. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1976: 847.Google Scholar
Conroy, Peter. Montesquieu Revisited. New York: Twayne Publishers, 1992.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. Constant: Political Writings, ed. Fontana, Biancamaria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Coquery, Natacha. L’Hôtel aristocratique: le marché du luxe à Paris au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne, 1998.Google Scholar
Cotta, Sergio. “Montesquieu e la libertà política.” In Leggere l’Esprit des lois, Stato, società e storia nel pensiero di Montesquieu, ed. Felice, Domenico. Naples: Liguori, 1998: 103–36.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. Montesquieu and Burke. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1963.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Montesquieu and the problem of ‘la diversité.’” In Enlightenment Essays in Memory of Robert Shackleton, ed. Barber, Giles and Courtney, C. P.. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1988.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Montesquieu and Revolution.” In Lectures de Montesquieu: Actes du Colloque de Wolfenbüttel (26–28 octobre 1989), ed. Mass, Edgar and Postigliola, Alberto. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1993: 4161.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Montesquieu and Natural Law.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 4168.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “L’Esprit des lois dans la perspective d l’histoire du livre (1748–1800).” In Le Temps de Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 October 1998), ed. Porret, Michael and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: 43–6.Google Scholar
Courtney, Cecil Patrick. “Morals and Manners in Montesquieu’s Analysis of the British System of Liberty.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca E.. New York: SUNY Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Cox, Iris. Montesquieu and the History of French Laws. Oxford: The Voltaire Foundation, 1983.Google Scholar
Cox, Iris. “Montesquieu and the History of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 409–30.Google Scholar
Craiutu, Aurelian. A Virtue for Courageous Minds: Moderation in French Political Thought, 1748–1830. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Crevier, J. B. L. Observations sur le livre de l’Esprit des lois. Paris: Desaint et Saillant, 1764.Google Scholar
Curtis, Michael. Orientalism and Islam: European Thinkers on Oriental Despotism in the Middle East and India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
D’Alembert, Jean Le Rond. “Éloge de M. de le Président de Montesquieu,” in Encylopédie, ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts, et des métiers, ed. Denis Diderot and Jean Le Rond d’Alembert. Paris: Briasson, 1751–1772.Google Scholar
Dallmayr, Fred. “Montesquieu’s Persian Letters.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Daudin, Guillaume. Commerce et prospérité: La France au XVIIIe siècle. Paris: Presses Universitaires de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2005.Google Scholar
Davis, David Brion. The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien. “On Political Liberty: Montesquieu’s Missing Manuscript.” Political Theory 39, no. 2 (2011): 181204.Google Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien. French Political Thought from Montesquieu to Tocqueville: Liberty in a Levelled Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien. “Montesquieu’s Controversial Context: The Spirit of the Laws as a Monarchist Tract.” History of Political Thought 34, no. 1 (2013): 668.Google Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien. “Was Montesquieu a Liberal Republican?The Review of Politics 76, no. 1 (2014): 2141.Google Scholar
de Dijn, Annelien. Freedom: An Unruly History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
de Senarclens, , Vanessa. Montesquieu, historien de Rome: un tournant pour la réflexion sur le statut de l’histoire au XVIIIe siècle. Geneva: Librarie Droz, 2003.Google Scholar
Derathé, Robert. “Notes.” In De L’esprit des lois, Baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu, 2 vols. Paris: Garneir, 1973.Google Scholar
Desgraves, Louis and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, eds. Catalogue de la bibliothèque de Montesquieu à La Brède. Naples: Liguori Editore, 1999.Google Scholar
Destutt de Tracy, Antoine Claude. A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws, to Which Are Annexed, Observations on the Thirty First Book by the Late M. Condorcet; and Two Letters of Helvetius, on the Merits of the Same Work. Trans. Thomas Jefferson. Philadelphia: William Duane, 1811.Google Scholar
Devellennes, Charles. “D’Holbach radical: contrat social et éthocratie dans la pensée politique du baron.” In Les Lumières radicales et histoire politique, ed. M. García Alonso. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2017.Google Scholar
Dewald, Jonathan. “Rethinking the 1 Percent: The Failure of the Nobility in Old Regime France.” The American Historical Review 124, no. 3 (2019): 911–32.Google Scholar
D’Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry. Éthocratie, ou Le gouvernement fondé sur la morale. Amsterdam: Chez Marc-Michel Rey, 1776.Google Scholar
Thiry, baron d’Holbach, Henri, Paul. Système sociale, ou principes naturels de la morale et de la politique. Paris: Navu, 1994.Google Scholar
Thiry, baron d’Holbach, Henri, Paul. La politique naturelle. Paris: Fayard, 1998.Google Scholar
Dobie, Madeline. Trading Places: Colonization and Slavery in Eighteenth-Century French Culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Dossa, Shiraz.Liberals and Muslims: Philosophy and Conquest.” Arab Studies Quarterly 37 (2015) : 5472.Google Scholar
Douglass, Robin. “Montesquieu and Modern Republicanism.” Political Studies 60, no. 3 (2012): 703–19.Google Scholar
Doyle, William. The Aristocracy and Its Enemies in the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Dubos, Jean-Baptiste. Histoire critique de l’établissement de la monarchie française dans les Gaules, 3 vols. Paris: Osmont, 1734.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. “Vers une théorie de la hiérarchie.” In Homo Hierarchicus, Le système des castes et ses implications. Paris: Gallimard, 1979.Google Scholar
de Nemours, Dupont, Samuel, Pierre. “De l’origine et des progrès d’une science nouvelle.” In Collection des principaux économistes, ed. Daire, E.. Paris: Dessaint, 1841.Google Scholar
Ehrard, Jean. “Rome enfin que je hais?” In Storia e ragione, ed. Postigliola, Alberto. Naples: Liguori, 1987: 23–32.Google Scholar
Ehrard, Jean. “L’Encyclopédie et l’esclavage: deux lectures de Montesquieu.” In Enlightenment Essays in Memory of Robert Shackleton, ed. Barber, Giles and Courtney, C. P.. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1988: 121–9.Google Scholar
Ehrard, Jean. L’esprit des mots: Montesquieu en lui-même et parmi les siens. Geneva: Librairie Droz S.A., 1998.Google Scholar
Ellis, Harold A.Montesquieu’s Modern Politics: The Spirit of the Laws and the Problem of Modern Monarchy in Old Regime France.” History of Political Thought 10, no. 4 (1989): 665700.Google Scholar
Eltis, David, Lewis, Frank D., and Richardson, David. “Slave Prices, the African Slave Trade, and Productivity in the Caribbean, 1674–1807.” The Economic History Review, New Series 58, no. 4 (2005): 673700.Google Scholar
Ewald, Johann Ludwig. Über Revolutionen, ihre Quellen und die Mittel dagegen. Berlin: Johann Friedrich Unger, 1792.Google Scholar
Faguet, Emile. Politique comparée de Montesquieu, Rousseau et Voltaire. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1902.Google Scholar
Fénelon, . Moral and Political Writings. Trans. Ryan Patrick Hanley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Fergus, Claudius. Revolutionary Emancipation. Slavery and Abolitionism in the British West Indies. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Adam. An Essay on the History of Civil Society [1767]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Niall. “Westerners Don’t Understand How Vulnerable Freedom Is.” The Guardian. February 20, 2011. www.theguardian.com/books/2011/feb/20/niall-ferguson-interview-civilization.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, D. K. The Colonial Empires: A Comparative Survey from the Eighteenth Century. New York: Delacorte Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Frank. “Montesquieu’s Influence on Anti-Slavery Opinion in England.” The Journal of Negro History 18 (1933): 414–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, Frank. Montesquieu and English Politics, 1750–1800. London: Edward Arnold & Co., 1939.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. Sécurité, territoire, population: cours au Collège de France (1977–1978), ed. Ewald, François, Fontana, Alessandro, and Senellart, Michel. Paris: Gallimard-Seuil, 2004.Google Scholar
Fox, Edward Whiting. History in Geographical Perspective: The Other France. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, 1971.Google Scholar
Gaddo, Irene and Tortarola, Edoardo. Secularizzazione e modernità. Rome: Carocci Editore, 2017.Google Scholar
Gay, Peter. The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. Vol. 1. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1995.Google Scholar
Ghachem, Malik. “Montesquieu in the Caribbean: The Colonial Enlightenment between ‘Code Noir’ and ‘Code Civil.’” Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques 25 (1999): 183210.Google Scholar
Ghervas, Stella. “La réception de L’Esprit des Lois en Russie.” In Le temps des Montesquieu: actes du colloque international de Genève (28–31 Octobre 1998), ed. Porret, Michel and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 2002: : 391–404.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Nathaniel K.Montesquieu’s Considerations on the State of Europe.” Journal of the History of Ideas 81, no. 3 (2020): 359–79.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Nathaniel and Sullivan, Vickie B.. “Montesquieu’s Teaching on the Dangers of Extreme Corrections: Japan, the Catholic Inquisition, and Moderation in The Spirit of the Laws. American Political Science Review 111 (2017): 460–70.Google Scholar
Goggi, Gianluigi. De l’Encyclopédie à l’éloquence républicaine. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2013.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Marc, trans. Social and Political Thought of the French Revolution, 1788–1797: An Anthology of Original Texts. New York: Peter Lang, 1997.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Montesquieu adversaire de Hobbes. Paris: Lettres modernes, 1980.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone. Montesquieu: la nature, les lois, la liberté. Paris: Presses Universitaires France, 1993.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. John Locke’s Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. Le Droit de la guerre et de la paix. Amsterdam: Vve P. de Coup, 1724.Google Scholar
Grotius, Hugo. The Rights of War and Peace. London: Innys, Manby et al., 1738.Google Scholar
Grouvelle, Philippe-Antoine. De l’autorité de Montesquieu dans la Révolution présente. Paris, 1789.Google Scholar
Gwyn, William B. The Meaning of the Separation of Powers: An Analysis of the Doctrine from its Origin to the Adoption of the United States Constitution. New Orleans: Tulane Studies in Political Science, 1965.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Halliday, Paul. Habeas Corpus: From England to Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander. The Federalist, ed. George W. Carey and James McClellan. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001.Google Scholar
Hammersley, Rachel. The English Republican Tradition and Eighteenth-Century France. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Hansen, Mogens. “The Mixed Constitution versus the Separation of Powers: Monarchical and Aristocratic Aspects of Modern Democracy.” History of Political Thought 31, no. 3 (2010): 509–31.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich. Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, [1807] 1952.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Fredrich. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, ed. Wood, Allen W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Helvétius, . “Letters of Helvétius, Addressed to President Montesquieu and M. Saurin, on Perusing the Manuscript of The Spirit of Laws.” In A Commentary and Review of Montesquieu’s Spirit of the Laws, to Which Are Annexed, Observations on the Thirty First Book by the Late M. Condorcet; and Two Letters of Helvetius, on the Merits of the Same Work, ed. Destutt, Antoine Claude de Tracy. New York: Burt Franklin, [1811] 1969: 283–92.Google Scholar
Hinsley, Francis Harry. Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before Its Triumph, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
Hoeckermann, A.Thomas Thorild, der skandinavische Lessing.” Greifswalder Tageblatt. Sontags-Blatt viii (1883).Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. “The Permanent Crisis of a Divided Mankind: ‘Contemporary Crisis of the Nation State’ in Historical Perspective.” In Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, ed. Hont, Istvan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005: 447528.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan. “The Early Enlightenment Debate on Commerce and Luxury.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Hoquet, Thierry, and Spector, Céline. “Comment lire Montesquieu?” In Lectures de l’Esprit des lois, ed. Hoquet, Thierry and Spector, Céline. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004: 733.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark. Montesquieu and the Old Regime. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Hume, David. Political Essays, ed. Knud Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Hunting, Claudine. “The Philosophes and Black Slavery: 1748–1765.” Journal of the History of Ideas 39, no. 3 (1978): 405–18.Google Scholar
Imbert, Paul-Henri. Destutt de Tracy, critique de Montesquieu ou De la Liberté en matière de politique. Paris: Nizet, 1974.Google Scholar
Imbruglia, Girolamo. “Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Naples.” In Naples in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Imbruglia, Girolamo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000: 7094.Google Scholar
Ippolito, Dario. L’Esprit des droits. Montesquieu et le pouvoir de punir. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2019.Google Scholar
Irwin, Terence. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford; New York: Clarendon Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man, 1670–1752. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Israel, Jonathan. The Enlightenment that Failed. Ideas: Revolution and Democratic Defeat, 1748–1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret. The Radical Enlightenment: Pantheists, Freemasons and Republicans. London: Allen and Unwin, 1981.Google Scholar
Jacob, Margaret. The Secular Enlightenment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Jameson, Russel L. Parsons. Montesquieu et l’esclavage: Étude sur les origines de l’opinion antiesclavagiste en France au VIIIe siècle. New York: Burt Franklin, 1971.Google Scholar
Jaucourt, Louis, chevalier de. “Slavery.” In The Encyclopedia of Diderot & d’Alembert: Collaborative Translation Project, trans. Naomi J. Andrews. Ann Arbor: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library, 2012.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Thomas. Writings, ed. Merrill D. Peterson. New York: Viking Presss, 1984.Google Scholar
Jennings, Jeremy. “The Debate about Luxury in Eighteenth-and Nineteenth-Century French Political Thought.” Journal of the History of Ideas 68, no. 1 (2007): 79105.Google Scholar
Jolly, Claude. “Introduction.” In Antoine Destutt de Tracy, Commentaire sur l’Esprit des lois de Montesquieu. Paris: Vrin, 2016.Google Scholar
Jones, Colin. The Great Nation: France from Louis XV to Napoleon. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Jones, Jr., James, F.Montesquieu and Jefferson Revisited: Aspects of a Legacy.” The French Review 51, no. 4 (1978): 577–85.Google Scholar
Jones, P. M. The Peasantry in the French Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Kahan, Alan. Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burkhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Thomas E.Money, Despotism and Public Opinion in Early Eighteenth-Century France: John Law and the Debate on Royal Credit.” Journal of Modern History 63, no. 1 (1991): 128.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R.Louis Le Caron Philosophe.” In Philosophy and Humanism: Renaissance Essays in Honor of Paul Oskar Kristeller, ed. Patrick Mahoney, Edward. Leiden: Brill, 1976: 3049.Google Scholar
Kelley, Donald R. “‘Second Nature’: The Idea of Custom in European Law, Society, and Culture.” In The Transmission of Culture in Early Modern Europe, ed. Grafton, Anthony and Blair, Ann. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990: 131–72.Google Scholar
Kelly, George. Mortal Politics in Eighteenth-Century France. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Keohane, Nannerl O. Philosophy and the State in France. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca E. Montesquieu and the Parlement of Bordeaux. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1996.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca E.Montesquieu on Religion and the Question of Toleration.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 375408.Google Scholar
Kingston, Rebecca E. “Religion.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Philip Stewart, ed. Catherine Volpilhac-Auger. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Kinneging, Andreas A. M. Aristocracy, Antiquity and History. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 1997.Google Scholar
Kra, Pauline. “La Défense des Lettres persanes.” In Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Catherine Larrère. Oxford, UK: Voltaire Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R.The Politics of Distinction and Disobedience: Honor and the Defense of Liberty in Montesquieu.” Polity 31, no. 3 (1999): 469–99.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R.The Spirit of Separate Powers in Montesquieu.” The Review of Politics 62, no. 2 (2000): 231–65.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R.Despotism in The Spirit of Laws.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 231–72.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R. Liberalism with Honor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R.Two Concepts of Liberty in Montesquieu.” Perspectives on Political Science 34, no. 2 (2005): 8896.Google Scholar
Krause, Sharon R.Freedom, Sovereignty, and the General Will in Montesquieu.” In The General Will. The Evolution of a Concept, ed. Farr, James and Williams, David Lay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 147–74.Google Scholar
La Beaumelle, Laurent Angliviel de. Suite de la défense de l’Esprit des Lois. Amsterdam: 1751.Google Scholar
Lafontant, Julien. Montesquieu et le problème de l’esclavage dans l’Esprit des lois. Sherbrooke, QC: Éditions Naaman, 1979.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Droit de punir et qualification des crimes de Montesquieu à Beccaria.” In Beccaria et la culture juridique des Lumières, ed. Michel Porret. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1997: 89108.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Les typologies des gouvernements chez Montesquieu.” Revue Montesquieu 5 (2001): 157–72.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu: L’Éclipse de la souveraineté.” Penser la souveraineté à l’epoque moderne et contemporaine, ed. Gian Mario Cazzaniga and Yves Charles Zarka. Paris: Vrin, 2001: 199214.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 335–74.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Women, Republicanism and the Growth of Commerce.” In Republicanism. A Shared European Heritage, 2 vols., ed. Van Gelderen, Martin and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002: 139–56.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu économiste? Une lecture paradoxale.” In Montesquieu en 2005, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2005: 243–66.Google Scholar
Larrère, Catherine. “Montesquieu and Liberalism: The Question of Pluralism.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2009: 279302.Google Scholar
Lauriol, Claude. La Beaumelle: Un Protestant cévenol entre Montesquieu et Voltaire. Geneva: Librairie Droz, 1978.Google Scholar
Lauriol, La Condamnation de L’Esprit des lois dans les archives de la Congrégation de l’Index.” In Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Catherine Larrère. Oxford, UK: Voltaire Foundation, 2005: 91103.Google Scholar
Lehner, Ulrich. The Catholic Enlightenment: The Forgotten History of a Global Movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T.Not So Novus an Ordo: Constitutions without Social Contracts.” Political Theory 37, no. 2 (2009): 191217.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T.Montesquieu’s Constitutional Legacies.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010: 115–38.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T. Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Levy, Jacob T.The Separation of Powers and the Challenge to Constitutional Democracy.” Review of Constitutional Studies 25 (2020): 1–18.Google Scholar
Linton, Marisa. The Politics of Virtue in Enlightenment France. Houndsmills: Palgrave, 2001.Google Scholar
Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Lowenthal, David. “Introduction.” In Montesquieu, Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline, ed. Lowenthal, David. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 1999: 120.Google Scholar
Lutz, Donald S.The Relative Influence of European Writers on Late Eighteenth-Century American Political Thought.” American Political Science Review 78, no. 1 (1984): 189–97.Google Scholar
Lynch, Andrew J.Montesquieu and the Ecclesiastical Critics of l’Esprit des lois.” Journal of the History of Ideas 38, no. 3 (1977): 487500.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. Discourses on Livy. Trans. Harvey Mansfield and Nathan Tarcov. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Malebranche, Nicolas. The Search after Truth. Trans. Thomas M. Lennon and Paul J. Olscamp. Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Maletz, Donald. “Tocqueville on Mores and the Preservation of Republics.” American Journal of Political Science 49, no. 1 (2005): 115.Google Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard. The Fable of the Bees, or Private Vices, Publick Benefits. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1988.Google Scholar
Manent, Pierre. The City of Man. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. “Les deux libéralismes: marché ou contre-pouvoirs.” Interventions 9 (1984): 1024.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. “Montesquieu, la république et le commerce.” European Journal of Sociology, vol. 42, no. 3 (2001): 573602.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. “Montesquieu et la politique moderne.” In Lectures de l’ Esprit des lois, ed. Spector, Céline and Hoquet, Thierry. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2004: 171231.Google Scholar
Marshall, John. “Voltaire, Priestcraft and Imposture: Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.” Intellectual History Review 28, no. 1 (2018): 167–84.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. In Marx Engels Werke, vol. 23. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1979.Google Scholar
Mason, Sheila. Montesquieu’s Idea of Justice. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.Google Scholar
Mass, Edgar. Literatur und Zensur in der frühen Aufklärung: Produktion, Distribution und Rezeption der Lettres persanes. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1981.Google Scholar
Matytsin, Anton. “Reason and Utility in French Religious Apologetics.” In God in the Enlightenment, ed. Bulman, William J. and Ingram, Robert G.. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016: 6382.Google Scholar
McDaniel, Iain. Adam Ferguson in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Roman Past and Europe’s Future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Merrick, Jeffery W. The Desacralization of the French Monarchy in the Eighteenth Century. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Meyer, Jean. La noblesse française à l’époque moderne (XVIe-XVIIIe siècles). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1991.Google Scholar
Minuti, Rolando. “An Overview: Montesquieu and Islam.” In Studies on Montesquieu: Mapping Political Diversity, ed. Rolando Minuti. Cham: Springer, 2018.Google Scholar
Monnier, Raymonde. “Montesquieu et le langage républicain: l’argumentaire de l’Esprit des lois.” La Révolution française 5 (2013): 1–15.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, baron de la Brède et de. The Spirit of Laws. 2 vols. Trans. Thomas Nugent. London: Nourse and Vaillant, 1750.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Caillois, Roger. 2 vols. Paris: Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, 1949–51.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Masson, André. 3 vols. Paris: Les Éditions Nagel, 1950–55.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. L’Esprit des lois, ed. Derathé, Robert. 2 vols. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 1973.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. The Spirit of Laws, A Compendium of the First English Edition, ed. Carrithers, David Wallace. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. The Spirit of the Laws, ed. Cohler, Anne M., Miller, Basia, and Stone, Harold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Pensées, Le Spicilège, ed. Desgraves, Louis. Paris: Laffont, 1991.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Oeuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. Ehrard, Jean, Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine, et. al. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1998-2008; Lyon and Paris: ENS Éditions and Classiques Garnier, 2010-.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Considerations on the Causes of the Greatness of the Romans and Their Decline. Trans. David Lowenthal. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, 1999.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Persian Letters, ed. Kahn, Andrew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. The Personal and the Political: Three Fables by Montesquieu, ed. Allen, W. B.. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 2008.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. My Thoughts, ed. Clark, Henry C.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2012.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Persian Letters, ed. Warner, Stuart D. and Douard, Stéphane. South Bend, IN: St. Augustine’s Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Lettres persanes, ed. Stewart, Philip and Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Lyon: Société Montesquieu and IHRIM (École normale supérieure de Lyon), 2019. http://montesquieu.huma-num.fr/editions/fictions-poesies/lettres-persanes.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Persian Letters, ed. Stewart, Philip. Lyon: École normale supérieure de Lyon, 2019. http://montesquieu.ens-lyon.fr/spip.php?rubrique245.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Discourses, Dissertations, and Dialogues on Politics, Science, and Religion, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Stewart, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Baron de la Brède et de. Essai sur le goût, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Lyon: Société Montesquieu and IHRIM (École normale supérieure de Lyon), 2020. http://montesquieu.huma-num.fr/editions/oeuvres-historiques-politiques-scientifiques-esthetiques.Google Scholar
Moore, James. “Montesquieu and the Scottish Enlightenment.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Rebecca, E. Kingston. Albany: SUNY Press, 2009: 179–98.Google Scholar
Morineau, Michel. “Budgets de l’État et gestion des finances royales en France au dix-huitième siècle.” Revue historique 264 (1980): 289336.Google Scholar
Morrissey, Robert. The Economy of Glory: From Ancien Régime France to the Fall of Napoleon. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A.The Judgmental Gaze of European Women: Gender, Sexuality, and the Critique of Republican Rule.” Political Theory 22, no. 1 (1994): 2544.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A.Monarchy’s Paradox: Honor in the Face of Sovereign Power.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, ed. Carrithers, David W., Mosher, Michael A., and Rahe, Paul A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 159–230.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A.Free Trade, Free Speech, and Free Love: Monarchy from the Liberal Prospect in Mid-eighteenth-Century France.” In Monarchisms in the Age of the Enlightenment: Liberty, Patriotism, and the Common Good, ed. Blom, Hans, Laursen, John Christian and Simonutti, Luisa. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2007: 101–18.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A.Perfection Does Not Concern Men or Things Universally.” In Montesquieu and His Legacy, ed. Kingston, Rebecca. Albany: SUNY Press, 2010: 7–30.Google Scholar
Mosher, Michael A.Montesquieu on Empire and Enlightenment.” In Empire and Modern Political Thought, ed. Muthu, Sankar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 112–54.Google Scholar
Murphy, Antoin E. John Law, : Economic Theorist and Policy-Maker. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Murphy, Antoin E. John Law, John Law et la bulle de la Compagnie du Mississippi,” L’Economie politique 48, no. 4 (2010): 722.Google Scholar
Nelson, Eric. The Greek Tradition in Republican Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Offen, Karen. The Woman Question in France, 1400–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Orain, Arnaud. La politique du merveilleux: une autre histoire du Système de Law (1695–1795). Paris: Fayard, 2018.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. “‘For Which Human Nature Can Never Be Too Grateful’: Montesquieu as the Heir of Christianity.” In Recovering Reason: Essays in Honor of Thomas L. Pangle, ed. Burns, Timothy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2010: 269–82.Google Scholar
Oudin, Charles. Le Spinozisme de Montesquieu: étude critique. Paris: 1911.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona. “La Révolution française et la formation de l’homme nouveau.” In L’Homme régénéré: essais sur la Révolution française. Paris: Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Pangle, Thomas. The Theological Basis of Liberal Modernity in Montesquieu’s “Spirit of the Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu. “Vico and Montesquieu: Limits of Pluralist Imagination.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 25 (1999): 5578.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. “Prière pour demander á Dieu le bon usage des maladies.” In Oeuvres complètes, 3 vols. Paris: Hachette, 1881: 2:28–34.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. The Machiavellian Moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Pocock, John G. A.Commerce, Credit, and Sovereignty: The Nation-State as Historical Critique.” In Markets, Morals, Politics: Jealousy of Trade and the History of Political Thought, ed. Kapossy, Béla, Nakhimovsky, Issac, Reinert, Sophua A., and Whatmore, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2018: 265–84.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam and Jose Maria, Maravall, eds. Democracy and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel von. De officio hominis et civis juxta legem naturalem libri duo. Lund: Junghans, 1673.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel von. Le Droit de la nature et des gens. Amsterdam: Vve P. de Coup, 1734.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel von. Of the Law of Nature and Nations, 5th ed. London: 1749.Google Scholar
Quesnay, François. “Despotisme de la Chine.” In Oeuvres économiques complètes et autres textes, ed. Théré, Christine, Charles, Loïc, and Perrot, Jean-Claude. Paris: INED, 2005: 1005–14.Google Scholar
Radasanu, Andrea. “Montesquieu on Moderation, Monarchy and Reform.” History of Political Thought 31, no. 2 (2010): 283308.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. “Forms of Government: Structure, Principle, Object, and Aim.” In Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2001: 69–108.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. “‘The Book That Never Was’: Montesquieu’s Considerations on the Romans in Historical Context.” History of Political Thought 26, no. 1 (2005): 4389.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. Soft Despotism: Democracy’s Drift: Montesquieu, Rousseau, Tocqueville and the Modern Prospect. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. “Was Montesquieu a Philosopher of History?” In Montesquieu et les philosophies de l’histoire au XVIIIe siècle, ed. Bianchi, Lorenzo and Minuti, Rolando. Naples: Liguori Editore, 2013: 71–86.Google Scholar
Rahe, Paul. “Carthage Can Now Defeat Rome: Political Order, Seaborne Commerce, and the Projection of Power in Barbon and Montesquieu,” in Applied History and Contemporary Policymaking: School of Statecraft, ed. Robert Crowcroft (London: Bloomsbury, 2022): 53–66.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. La haine de la démocratie. Paris: La fabrique éditions, 2005.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Dennis C. The Pragmatic Enlightenment: Recovering the Liberalism of Hume, Smith, Montesquieu, and Voltaire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Rétat, Pierre. “De Mandeville à Montesquieu: honneur, luxe et dépense noble dans L’Esprit des lois.” Studi francesi 50 (1973): 238–49.Google Scholar
Revel, Jacques. “The Uses of Comparison: Religions in the Early Eighteenth Century.” In Bernard Picart and the First Global Vision of Religion, ed. Hunt, Lynn, Jacob, Margaret C., and Mijnhardt, Wijnand. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010: 331–47.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. “Comparative Political Analysis in Montesquieu and Tocqueville.” Comparative Politics 1 (1969): 129–60.Google Scholar
Richter, Melvin. Political Theory of Montesquieu. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick. The Philosophers’ Philosophy of Law from the Seventeenth Century to Our Days. Dordrecht: Springer, 2009.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jennifer Tolbert. Athens on Trial: The Antidemocratic Tradition in Western Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Romani, Roberto. “All Montesquieu’s Sons: The Place of Esprit Général, Caractère National, and Mœurs in French Political Philosophy, 1748–1789,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 362 (1998): 189235.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, Pierre. Le siècle du populisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2020.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, Helena. “The Christian Enlightenment.” In The Cambridge History of Christianity, vol. 7: Enlightenment, Reawakening and Revolution, 1600–1815, ed. Stewart J. Brown and Timothy Tackett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Rosso, Corrado. Montesquieu moraliste, des lois au bonheur. Bordeaux: Ducros, 1971.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Basic Political Writings. Trans. Donald A. Cress. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Discourse on Political Economy and The Social Contract. Trans. Christopher Betts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Rush, Benjamin. An Address to the Inhabitants of the British Settlements in America, upon Slave-Keeping. Philadelphia: John Dunlop, 1773.Google Scholar
Sabine, George H. A History of Political Theory, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rineart, and Winston, 1961.Google Scholar
Sagar, Paul. The Opinion of Mankind: Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Sala-Molins, Louis. Dark Side of the Light: Slavery and the French Enlightenment. Trans. John Conteh-Morgan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 2005.Google Scholar
Salkever, Stephen. “Aristotle’s Social Science.” In Aristotle’s Politics: Critical Essays, ed. Kraut, Richard and Skultety, Steven. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005: 2764.Google Scholar
Samuel, Ana. “The Design of Montesquieu’s The Spirit of the Laws: The Triumph of Freedom over Determinism.” American Political Science Review 103, no. 2 (2009): 305–21.Google Scholar
Schaub, Diana. Erotic Liberalism: Women and Revolution in Montesquieu’s Persian Letters. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1995.Google Scholar
Schaub, Diana. “Of Believers and Barbarians: Montesquieu’s Enlightened Toleration.” In Early Modern Skepticism and the Origins of Toleration, ed. Levine, Alan. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 1999: 225–48.Google Scholar
Schaub, Diana. “The Regime and Montesquieu’s Principles of Education.” In Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002: 77100.Google Scholar
Schaub, Diana. “Montesquieu on Slavery.” Perspectives on Political Science 34 (2005), 708.Google Scholar
Schaub, Diana. “The Education of the Sentiments in Montesquieu’s The Temple of Gnidus.” In The Arts of Rule: Essays in Honor of Harvey C. Mansfield, ed. Krause, Sharon and Ann McGrail, Mary. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2009: 125–46.Google Scholar
Schiffman, Zachary S. The Birth of the Past. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. Political Theology, ed. George Schwab. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jean-Paul. “Les Jeux du sens dans les Lettres persanes: temps du roman et temps de l’histoire.” Revue Montesquieu 4 (2000): 127–59.Google Scholar
Schneider, Jean-Paul. “Les Lettres persanes, trente ans après,” in Montesquieu, Oeuvre ouverte? (1748–1755): Actes du Colloque de Bordeaux, ed. Catherine Larrère. Oxford, UK: Voltaire Foundation, 2005.Google Scholar
Seeber, Edward Derbyshire. Anti-Slavery Opinion in France during the Second Half of the Eighteenth Century. New York: Greenwood Press, 1937.Google Scholar
SewellJr., William H.The Empire of Fashion and the Rise of Capitalism in Eighteenth-Century France.” Past and Present 206, no. 1 (2010): 81120.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. “La genèse de L’Esprit des lois.” Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France 52 (1952): 425–38.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. Montesquieu: A Critical Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Shackleton, Robert. “La religion de Montesquieu.” In Essays on Montesquieu and on the Enlightenment, ed. Gilson, David and Smith, Martin. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1988: 109–16.Google Scholar
Sharp, Granville. A Representation of the Injustice and Dangerous Tendency of Tolerating Slavery; or of Admitting the Least Claim of Private Property in the Persons of Men, in England. London: Crukshank, 1769.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. Ordinary Vices. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. Montesquieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. “The Liberalism of Fear.” In Liberalism and the Moral Life, ed. Rosenblum, Nancy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989: 149–66.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. “Montesquieu and the New Republicanism.” In Machiavelli and Republicanism, ed. Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 265–80.Google Scholar
Shovlin, John. The Political Economy of Virtue: Luxury, Patriotism and the Origins of the French Revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought: Volume 2, The Age of Reformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. “The Sovereign State: A Genealogy.” In Sovereignty in Fragments: The Past, Present, and Future of a Contested Concept, ed. Kalmo, Hent and Skinner, Quentin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010: 26–46.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. R. H. Campbell, Skinner, Andrew S., and Todd, William B.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Smith, Jay. Nobility Reimagined: The Patriotic Nation in Eighteenth-Century France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. Before the Deluge. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. Sans-Culottes: An Eighteenth-Century Emblem in the French Revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Sonenscher, Michael. Work and Wages: Natural Law, Politics and the Eighteenth-Century French Trades. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sorkin, David. The Religious Enlightenment: Protestants, Jews, and Catholics from London to Vienna. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Vices privés, vertus publiques: de La Fable des abeilles à L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu and the Spirit of Modernity, ed. Carrithers, David W. and Coleman, Patrick. Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2002: 127–57.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Montesquieu: Critique of republicanism?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6, no. 1 (2003): 3853.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Montesquieu et les infortunes de la vertu.” Esprit 402 (2004): 3144.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. Montesquieu: pouvoirs, richesses, et sociétés. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 2004.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. Montesquieu et l’émergence de l’économie politique. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2006.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Naturalisation des croyances, religion naturelle et histoire naturelle de la religion: le statut du fait religieux dans L’Esprit des lois.” In Montesquieu, l’État et la Religion: Actes du colloque de Sofia, 6–8 Octobre 2005, ed. Ehrard, Jean. Sofia: Éditions Iztok-Zapad, 2007: 40–78.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. Montesquieu, Liberté, droit et histoire. Paris: Michalon, 2010.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Was Montesquieu Liberal? The Spirit of the Laws in the History of Liberalism.” In French Liberalism from Montesquieu to the Present Day, ed. Geenens, Raf and Rosenblatt, Helena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 57–72.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Corruption.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Spector, Céline. “Bâtir Chalcédoine, le rivage de Byzance devant les yeux: Oceana, de Harrington à Montesquieu.” In Harrington et le républicanisme à l’âge classique, ed. Gracianette, Bernard, Miqueu, Cristophe and Terrel, Jean. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux, 2014: 131–48.Google Scholar
Spurlin, Paul Merrill. Montesquieu in America, 1760–1801. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1940.Google Scholar
Stafford, James. “International Relations: Power, Peace, and the People.” In A Cultural History of Democracy in the Age of Enlightenment, ed. Mosher, Michael and Plassart, Anna. London: Bloomsbury, 2021: 201–17.Google Scholar
Starobinski, Jean. “Préface.” In Les Lettres persanes en leur temps, ed. Philip Stewart. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013: 2942.Google Scholar
Steiner, Philippe. “Commerce, Commerce Politique.” In Commerce, Population et Société Autour de Vincent Gournay (1748–1758), ed. Charles, Loïc and Théré, Christine. Paris: INED, 2009.Google Scholar
Stewart, Philip. “Toujours Usbek.” Eighteenth Century Fiction 11, no. 2 (1999): 141–50.Google Scholar
Stewart, Philip. “Les émigrés.” In Les Lettres persanes en leur temps, ed. Stewart, Philip. Paris: Classiques Garnier, 2013: 29–42.Google Scholar
Stewart, Philip. “Persian Letters.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Stewart, William. “Montesquieu vu par les Anglais depuis deux siècles.” In Actes du congrès Montesquieu réuni à Bordeaux du 23 au 26 Mai 1955. Bordeaux: Impriméries Delmas, 1956.Google Scholar
Stillman, Peter G.Hegel’s Civil Society: A Locus of Freedom.” Polity 12, no. 4 (1980): 622–46.Google Scholar
Straumann, Benjamin. Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Strugnell, Anthony. Diderot’s Politics. The Hague: Springer, 1973.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Vickie B. Montesquieu and the Despotic Ideas of Europe: An Interpretation of The Spirit of the Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Terrel, Jean. “Sovereignty.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Thorild, Thomas. “Critik over Montesquieu.” In Samlade Skrifter, ed. Arvidson, Stellan. Stockholm: 1933: 2:279–85.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. Trans. George Lawrence, ed. Mayer, J. P.. New York: Harper Perennial, 2006.Google Scholar
Trescher, Hildegard. Montesquieus Einfluss auf die philosophischen Grundlagen der Staatslehre Hegels. PhD dissertation. University of Leipzig, 1917.Google Scholar
Trivellato, Francesca. The Promise and Peril of Credit: What a Forgotten Legend about Jews and Finance Tells Us about the Making of European Commercial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. The Sleeping Sovereign: The Invention of Modern Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Turnbull, Gordon. An Apology for Negro Slavery: Or the West-India Planters Vindicated from the Charge of Inhumanity. London: 1786.Google Scholar
Vantuch, Anton. “Réflexions sur la monarchie universelle: Montesquieu et ses velléités de carrière diplomatique.” Acta Universitatis XVII, Novembris Pragensis Bulletin (1974): 177–221.Google Scholar
Vaughan, C. E. Studies in the History of Political Philosophy Before and After Rousseau, 2 vols. New York: Russell & Russell, 1960.Google Scholar
Velde, François R.John Law’s System.” The American Economic Review 97, no. 2 (2007): 276–9.Google Scholar
Vile, M. J. C. Constitutionalism and the Separation of Powers. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Villa, Dana. “Hegel, Tocqueville, and Individualism.” The Review of Politics 67, no. 4, (2005): 657–86.Google Scholar
Villaverde Rico, Maria José. “L’Abbé Raynal, philosophe radical.” In Les Lumières radicales et le politique, ed. García-Alons, Marta. Paris: Champion, 2017: 229–61.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. “Une modération radicale? Montesquieu.” In Qu’est-ce que les Lumières radicales? Libertinage, athéisme et spinozisme dans le tournant philosophique de l’âge classique, ed. Secrétan, Catherine, Dagron, Triston and Bove, Laurent. Paris: Éditions Amsterdam 2007: 389–98.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Un auteur en quête d’éditeurs? Histoire éditoriale de l’œuvre de Montesquieu (1748–1964). Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2011.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. A Montesquieu Dictionary [online]. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. “Vernet, Jacob.” In A Montesquieu Dictionary. Trans. Stewart, Philip, ed. Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. ENS Lyon, September 2013.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Bibliothèque virtuelle Montesquieu. Lyon: École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 2016. http://montesquieu.huma-num.fr/bibliotheque/introduction.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Montesquieu. Paris: Gallimard, 2017.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Montesquieu: une histoire de temps. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 2017.Google Scholar
Volpilhac-Auger, Catherine. Montesquieu: Let There Be Enlightenment. Trans. Stewart, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . Épitre à l’auteur du livre des Trois Imposteurs. In Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, vol. 10, ed. Moland, Louis. Paris: Garnier, 1877–85: 402–5.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . Pensées sur le gouvernement. In Oeuvres complètes de Voltaire, vol. 23, ed. Moland, Louis. Paris: Garnier, 1877–85.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . “The A B C, or Dialogues between A B C, translated from the English by Mr Huet.” In Political Writings, ed. David Willams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994: 856.Google Scholar
Vyverberg, Henry. Human Nature, Cultural Diversity, and the French Enlightenment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Waddicor, Mark. Montesquieu and the Philosophy of Natural Law. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1970.Google Scholar
Ward, Lee. “Montesquieu on Federalism and Anglo-Gothic Constitutionalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 37, no. 4 (2007): 551–77.Google Scholar
Watts, David. The West Indies: Patterns of Development, Culture, and Environmental Change Since 1492. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Weil, Françoise. “Montesquieu et le despotisme.” Actes du congrès Montesquieu. Bordeaux: Delmas, 1956: 191215.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. Condorcet and Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. “Political Ontology and Institutional Design in Montesquieu and Rousseau.” American Journal of Political Science 54, no. 2 (2010): 525–42.Google Scholar
Williams, David Lay. “Spinoza and the General Will.” In The General Will: The Evolution of a Concept, ed. Farr, James and Lay Williams, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015: 115–46.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. M. Diderot. New York: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Winock, Michel. “La Démocratie.” In La France républicaine. Paris: Robert Laffont, 2017.Google Scholar
Winterer, Caroline. American Enlightenments: Pursuing Happiness in the Age of Reason. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Wolloch, Nathaniel. History and Nature in the Enlightenment: Praise of the Mastery of Nature in Eighteenth-Century Historical Literature. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Wong, R. Bin. “Taxation and Good Governance in China, 1500–1914.” In The Rise of Fiscal States: A Global History, 1500–1914, ed. Yuh-Casalilla, Bartolomé and O’Brien, Patrick F.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012: 353–77.Google Scholar
Wright, Johnson. “A Rhetoric of Aristocratic Reaction? Nobility in De l’Esprit des Lois.” In The French Nobility in the Eighteenth Century: Reassessments and New Approaches, ed. Smith, Jay M.. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2006: 227–51.Google Scholar
Wright, JohnsonMontesquieuean Moments: The Spirit of the Laws and Republicanism.” Journal of the Western Society for French History 35 (2007): 149–69.Google Scholar
Yack, Bernard. Longing for Total Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Zaretsky, Robert. Catherine and Diderot. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019.Google Scholar