Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T16:15:59.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 11 - The Future of Needs Assessment Research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2021

Juanita Hoe
Affiliation:
City, University of London
Martin Orrell
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

People are living longer, and the growth of the ageing population has led to an increase in demand for the use of health services. As life expectancy is extended, so the prevalence of long-term conditions and multi-morbidity increases. While healthy ageing is achievable, the distribution of health depends on social and economic determinants, and improvements in health outcomes are associated with higher socioeconomic status.1 Healthy ageing is linked to physical, mental, functional and social wellbeing but also depends on the role older people have in society and the reduction of age-discriminatory health inequalities.2 Currently, ageing is associated with increased use of health services, but older people are generally considered lower priority for treatment and receive poorer-quality care.3 Moreover, austerity measures over the last decade have led to a widening of social and economic inequalities, which have resulted in poorer health and increasing health inequality.4 Constraints in spending on health and social care raise questions as to how health and social services will use the resources available to meet the needs of the older populations they serve.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Marmot, M, Allen, J, Bell, R, et al. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet 2012; 380(9846):1011–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadana, R, Blas, E, Budhwani, S, et al. Healthy ageing: Raising awareness of inequalities, determinants, and what could be done to improve health equity. Gerontologist 2016; 56(S2):S178–93.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. Review of Social Determinants and the Health Divide in the WHO European Region: Final Report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013.Google Scholar
Marmot, M. Health equity in England: The Marmot review 10 years on. British Medical Journal 2020; 368: 1–4.Google Scholar
Ham, C, Dixon, A, Brooke, B. Transforming the Delivery of Health and Social Care. Kings Fund Report. London: The Kings Fund; 2012.Google Scholar
Marmot, M, Bell, R. Fair society, healthy lives. Public Health 2012; 126(Suppl. 1):S410.Google Scholar
Benzeval, M, Bond, L, Campbell, M, et al. How does money influence health? Project report, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, UK; 2014.Google Scholar
Wright, J, Williams, R, Wilkinson, JR. Development and importance of health needs assessment. British Medical Journal 1998; 316(7140):1310–13.Google ScholarPubMed
Stevens, A, Raftery, J, Mant, J, Simpson, S. Health Care Needs Assessment: The Epidemiologically Based Needs Assessment Reviews. Abingdon, UK: Radcliffe Publishing; 2004.Google Scholar
Hensher, M, Fulop, N. The influence of health needs assessment on health care decision-making in London health authorities. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 1999; 4(2):90–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, T, Thornicroft, G, Abas, M, et al. Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE): Development, validity and reliability. British Journal of Psychiatry 2000; 176(5):444–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moniz-Cook, E, Vernooij-Dassen, M, Woods, R, et al. A European consensus on outcome measures for psychosocial intervention research in dementia care. Aging & Mental Health 2008; 12(1):1429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moniz-Cook, E, Vernooij-Dassen, M, Woods, B, et al. Psychosocial interventions in dementia care research: The INTERDEM manifesto. Aging & Mental Health 2011; 15(3):283–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orrell, M. The new generation of psychosocial interventions for dementia care. British Journal of Psychiatry 2012; 201(5):342–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spector, A, Thorgrimsen, L, Woods, BO, et al. Efficacy of an evidence-based cognitive stimulation therapy programme for people with dementia: Randomised, controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 2003; 183(3):248–54.Google Scholar
Graff, MJ, Vernooij-Dassen, MJ, Thijssen, M, et al. Community based occupational therapy for patients with dementia and their care givers: Randomised, controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2006; 333(7580):1196–9.Google Scholar
Teri, L, Gibbons, LE, McCurry, SM, et al. Exercise plus behavioral management in patients with Alzheimer disease: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2003; 290(15):2015–22.Google Scholar
Livingston, G, Barber, J, Marston, L, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Managing Agitation and Raising Quality of Life (MARQUE) intervention for agitation in people with dementia in care homes: A single-blind, cluster-randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6(4):293304.Google Scholar
Livingston, G, Barber, J, Rapaport, P, et al. Clinical effectiveness of a manual based coping strategy programme (START, STrAtegies for RelaTives) in promoting the mental health of carers of family members with dementia: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 2013;347:1–14.Google Scholar
Øksnebjerg, L, Diaz‐Ponce, A, Gove, D, et al. Towards capturing meaningful outcomes for people with dementia in psychosocial intervention research: A pan‐European consultation. Health Expectations 2018; 21(6):1056–65.Google Scholar
de Rossi Figueiredo, D, Paes, LG, Warmling, AM, et al. Multidimensional measures validated for home health needs of older persons: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2018; 77:130–7.Google Scholar
Davis, S, Dorevitch, M, Garratt, S. Person-centred comprehensive geriatric assessment. In: Older People: Issues and Innovations in Care. Sydney: Churchill Livingstone; 2009:168–88.Google Scholar
Foreman, P, Thomas, S, Gardner, I. The review and identification of an existing, validated, comprehensive assessment tool. Report for the Department of Human Services, Lincoln Centre for Ageing and Community Care Research, Australian Institute for Primary Care at La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia; 2004.Google Scholar
Moriarty, J. Assessing the mental health needs of older people: Systematic review on the use of standardised measures to improve assessment practice. Social Care Workforce Research Unit Report, King’s College, London; 2002.Google Scholar
Schmid, R, Eschen, A, Rüegger‐Frey, B, Martin, M. Instruments for comprehensive needs assessment in individuals with cognitive complaints, mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2012; 27(4):329–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vernooij-Dassen, M, Moniz-Cook, E, Verhey, F, et al. Bridging the divide between biomedical and psychosocial approaches in dementia research: The 2019 INTERDEM manifesto. Aging & Mental Health 2020; 17.Google Scholar
Vernooij-Dassen, M, Jeon, YH. Social health and dementia: The power of human capabilities. International Psychogeriatrics 2016; 28(5):701–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huber, M, Knottnerus, JA, Green, L, et al. How should we define health? British Medical Journal 2011; 343(7817):13.Google Scholar
Sundström, A, Adolfsson, AN, Nordin, M, Adolfsson, R. Loneliness increases the risk of all-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Gerontology: Series B 2020; 75(5):919–26.Google ScholarPubMed
Sundström, A, Westerlund, O, Kotyrlo, E. Marital status and risk of dementia: A nationwide population-based prospective study from Sweden. British Medical Journal Open 2016; 6(1):1–7.Google Scholar
Scarmeas, N, Stern, Y. Cognitive reserve: implications for diagnosis and prevention of Alzheimer’s disease. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports 2004; 4(5):374–80.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Framework on Integrated, People-Centred Health Services. Geneva: WHO; 2016.Google Scholar
Marmot, M, Allen, J, Bell, R, et al. WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet 2012; 380(9846):1011–29.Google Scholar
Phanareth, K, Vingtoft, S, Christensen, AS, et al. The Epital care model: A new person-centered model of technology-enabled integrated care for people with long term conditions. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2017; 6(1):1–15.Google Scholar
Kayser, L, Karnoe, A, Duminski, E, et al. A new understanding of health related empowerment in the context of an active and healthy ageing. BMC Health Services Research 2019; 19(1):1–13.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology (GATE). Geneva: WHO; 2014.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Assistive Technology Fact Sheet. Geneva: WHO; 2018.Google Scholar
Age UK. Technology and Older People Evidence Review. London: Age UK; 2010.Google Scholar
Hanson, E, Magnusson, L, Arvidsson, H, et al. Working together with persons with early stage dementia and their family members to design a user-friendly technology-based support service. Dementia 2007; 6(3):411–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Span, M, Hettinga, M, Vernooij-Dassen, M, et al. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: A systematic review. Ageing Research Reviews 2013; 12(2):535–51.Google Scholar
Meiland, FJ, Bouman, AI, Sävenstedt, S, et al. Usability of a new electronic assistive device for community-dwelling persons with mild dementia. Aging & Mental Health 2012; 16(5):584–91.Google Scholar
Meiland, FJ, Hattink, BJ, Overmars-Marx, T, et al. Participation of end users in the design of assistive technology for people with mild to severe cognitive problems: The European Rosetta Project. International Psychogeriatrics 2014; 26(5):769–79.Google Scholar
Cruz-Sandoval, D, Morales-Tellez, A, Sandoval, EB, et al. Robot as therapy facilitator in interventions to deal with dementia-related behavioral symptoms. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020:161–9.Google Scholar
Carers, E. Embracing the critical role of caregivers around the world. White paper and action plan, Darmstadt, Germany; 2017.Google Scholar
Carers UK. State of caring: A snapshot of unpaid care in the UK. State of Caring Report, London; 2019.Google Scholar
Bouget, D, Saraceno, C, Spasova, S. Towards new work-life balance policies for those caring for dependent relatives? In Vanhercke, B, Sabato, S, Bouget, D (eds.), Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play. Eighteenth annual report. Brussels: ETUI - European Trade Union Institute; 2017:155–7.Google Scholar
Her Majesty’s Government. Care Act 2014 (c. 23). London: The Stationery Office (TSO); 2014.Google Scholar
Milne, A, Hatzidimitriadou, E, Chryssanthopoulou, C, Owen, T. Caring in later life: Reviewing the role of older carers. Help the Aged; 2001.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Caring about carers: A national strategy for carers. White paper, Department of Health, London; 1999.Google Scholar
Harland, JA, Bath, PA. Understanding the information behaviours of carers of people with dementia: A critical review of models from information science. Aging & Mental Health 2008; 12(4):467–77.Google Scholar
Gaugler, JE, Anderson, KA, Leach, CR, et al. The emotional ramifications of unmet need in dementia caregiving. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease & Other Dementias 2004; 19(6):369–80.Google Scholar
Novais, T, Dauphinot, V, Krolak-Salmon, P, Mouchoux, C. How to explore the needs of informal caregivers of individuals with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease or related diseases? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. BMC Geriatrics 2017; 17(1):18.Google Scholar
Fernandes, L, Gonçalves-Pereira, M, Leuschner, A, et al. Validation study of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) in Portugal. International Psychogeriatrics 2009; 21(1):1–9.Google Scholar
Park, M, Kim, SK, Jeong, M, et al. Psychometric validation of the Korean version of the Camberwell assessment of need for the elderly in individuals with dementia. Asian Nursing Research 2018; 12(2):106–12.Google Scholar
Stein, J, Luppa, M, König, HH, Riedel-Heller, SG. The German version of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE): Evaluation of content validity and adaptation to the German-speaking context. International Psychogeriatrics 2015; 27(11):1919–26.Google Scholar
Salehi, R, Davatgaran, K, Heidari, M, et al. The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CANE) for Iranian elderly people with mental disorders. Iranian Journal of Ageing 2018; 13(2):168–81.Google Scholar
Greaves, S, Bhat, M, Regan, C, et al. The unmet needs of referrals to old age psychiatry liaison services. Psychogeriatria Polska 2006; 3(4):175–82.Google Scholar
Wieczorowska-Tobis, K, Talarska, D, Kropińska, S, et al. The Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly questionnaire as a tool for the assessment of needs in elderly individuals living in long-term care institutions. Archives of Gerontology & Geriatrics 2016; 62:163–8.Google Scholar
Philp, I. EASY-Care: A systematic approach to the assessment of older people. Geriatric Medicine 2000; 30(5):1519.Google Scholar
Carpenter, GI. InterRAI UK MDS Home Care Assessment Instrument for Community Care: User’s Manual. York, UK: InterRAIUK; 2002.Google Scholar
Murray, J, Young, J, Forster, A. Measuring outcomes in the longer term after a stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2009; 23(10):918–21.Google Scholar
Gonçalves-Pereira, M, Fernandes, L, Leuschner, A, et al. Versão portuguesa do CANE (Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly): Desenvolvimento e dados preliminares. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública 2007; 25(1):718.Google Scholar
Hoogendijk, EO, Muntinga, ME, van Leeuwen, KM, et al. Self-perceived met and unmet care needs of frail older adults in primary care. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2014; 58(1):3742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iliffe, S, Lenihan, P, Orrell, M, et al. The development of a short instrument to identify common unmet needs in older people in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54(509):914–18.Google Scholar
Balsinha, C, Marques, MJ, Gonçalves-Pereira, M. A brief assessment unravels unmet needs of older people in primary care: A mixed-methods evaluation of the SPICE tool in Portugal. Primary Health Care Research & Development 2018; 19(6):637–43.Google Scholar
Rymaszewska, J, Kłak, R, Synak, A. Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE): Badanie polskiej wersji narzędzia. Psychogeriatria Polska 2008; 5(2):105–13.Google Scholar
Fink, HA. Testing of the Camberwell Assessment of Need for the Elderly (CANE) in a German setting. Doctoral dissertation, Medical University, Berlin, Germany; 2011.Google Scholar
Regulation protection: General data protection regulation. Weston-super-Mare, UK: InTouch CRM; 2018. Available at www.intouchcrm.com/about-gdpr/ (accessed 27 July 2020).Google Scholar
British Psychological Society. Electronic records guidance. BPS, Leeds, UK; 2019.Google Scholar
Department of Health. Prime Minister’s challenge on dementia 2020: Implementation plan. Department of Health, London; 2015. Available at www.gov.uk/government/publications/challenge-on-dementia-2020-implementation-plan.Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Public Service and Demographic Change. Ready for Ageing Report, vol. 2. London: The Stationery Office; 2013. Available at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201213/ldselect/ldpublic/140/14002.htm (accessed 27 July 2020).Google Scholar
NHS England. Five-year forward view. NHS, London; 2014. Available at www.england.nhs.uk/five-year-forward-view/(accessed 27 July 2020).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Global Action Plan on the Public Health Response to Dementia 2017–2025. Geneva: WHO; 2017.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×