Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools Comparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives
Book contents
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Part I Issues in Studying Cross-National Differences
- Part II Comparative Data on Bullying
- Part III Working with Students and Teachers
- 10 PhotoStory
- 11 Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Bullying in Australia and India
- 12 Indian Perspectives on Bullying and Cyber Bullying
- 13 Exchanging Ideas
- 14 Bullying, Law and Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives
- Part IV Commentaries from North America
- Index
- References
13 - Exchanging Ideas
Anti-bullying Intervention Including Peer and Parent Support Strategies
from Part III - Working with Students and Teachers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2018
Book contents
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Part I Issues in Studying Cross-National Differences
- Part II Comparative Data on Bullying
- Part III Working with Students and Teachers
- 10 PhotoStory
- 11 Pre-service Teachers’ Understanding of Bullying in Australia and India
- 12 Indian Perspectives on Bullying and Cyber Bullying
- 13 Exchanging Ideas
- 14 Bullying, Law and Pre-service Teachers’ Perspectives
- Part IV Commentaries from North America
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in SchoolsComparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives, pp. 255 - 284Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Axford, N., Farrington, D. P., Clarkson, S., Bjornstad, G. J., Wrigley, Z. & Hutchings, J. (2015). Involving parents in school-based programmes to prevent and reduce bullying: What effect does it have? Journal of Children’s Services, 10, 242–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JCS-05–2015-0019.Google Scholar
Bellon, J.-P. & Gardette, B. (2016). Harcèlement scolaire: le vaincre, c’est possible. La méthode Pikas : une technique éprouvée. Paris: European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Blaya, C. & Cohen, J. (2016). L’amélioration du climat scolaire en Europe et en Amérique du Nord: la mobilisation de tous pour la réussite scolaire et personnelle de chacun. In Debarbieux, E. (ed.), L’école face à la Violence – Décrire, expliquer, agir (pp. 183–196). Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
Blaya, C. & Dalloz, M. (2016). Mon enfant est victime/auteur de harcèlement. Paris: Soubeyran.Google Scholar
Bonafé-Schmitt, J.-P. (2006). La médiation scolaire par les pairs: Une alternative à la violence à l’École. Spirale, 37, 173–182.Google Scholar
Cantone, E., Piras, A. P., Vellante, M., Preti, A., Danielsdottir, S., D’Ajola, E., Lesinskiene, S., Angermeyer, M. C., Carta, M. G. & Bhugra, D. (2015). Interventions on bullying and cyberbullying in schools: A systematic review. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 11 (Suppl. 1: M4), 58–76.Google Scholar
Condette-Castelain, S. & Hue-Nonin, C. (2014). La Médiation par les élèves. Enjeux et perspectives pour la vie scolaire. Dijon: Canopé.Google Scholar
Cornell, D. & Limber, S. P. (2015). Law and policy on the concept of bullying at school. American Psychologist, 70(4), 333–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a003855.Google Scholar
Cowie, H. & Smith, P. K. (2010). Peer support as a means of improving school safety and reducing bullying and violence. In Doll, B., Pfohl, W. & Yoon, J. (eds.), Handbook of Prevention Research (pp. 177–193). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cowie, H. & Wallace, P. (2000). Peer Support in Action – From Bystanding to Standing By. London: Sage.Google Scholar
DCSF (2007). Safe to learn: Embedding anti-bullying work in schools. www.antibullyingalliance.org.uk/tackling_bullying_behaviour/in_schools/law,_policy_and_guidance/safe_to_learn.aspx.Google Scholar
Debarbieux, E. (2016). L’école face à la Violence – Décrire, expliquer, agir. Paris: Dunod.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEPP (2015). Note d’information n°49. Paris, Ministère de l’Education nationale, de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche.Google Scholar
DfES (2nd edn., 2000; revised 2002). Bullying: Don’t Suffer in Silence. An Anti-bullying Pack for Schools. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Early Childhood Association (2016). Survey on Bribing, Threatening and Keeping Secrets. Mumbai: Early Childhood Association.Google Scholar
Evans, C. B. R., Fraser, M. W. & Cotter, K. L. (2014). The effectiveness of school-based bullying prevention programs: A systemic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 532–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrington, D. P. & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, 1–148.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Barbero, J. A., Ruiz-Hernández, J. A., Llor-Zaragoza, L., Pérez-Garćia, M. & Llor-Esteban, B. (2016). Effectiveness of anti-bullying school programs: A meta-analysis. Children and Youth Services Review, 61, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuyken, W., Weare, K., Ukoumunne, O. C., Vicray, R., Motton, N., Burnett, R., Cullen, C., Hennelly, S. & Huppert, F. (2013). Effectiveness of the Mindfulness in Schools Programme: Non-randomised controlled feasibility study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203(2), 126–131. doi 10.1192/bjp.bp 113.126649.Google Scholar
Morrow, V. & Singh, R. (2014). Corporal Punishment in Schools in Andhra Pradesh, India: Children’s and Parents’ Views. Oxford: Young Lives.Google Scholar
Nuwer, H. (1990). Broken Pledges: The Deadly Rite of Hazing. Marietta, GA: Longstreet Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ott, L. (2007). Pourquoi ont-ils brûlé les écoles?. In Mucchielli, L. & Le Goaziou, V. (eds.), Quand les banlieues brûlent (pp. 126–144). Paris: la découverte.Google Scholar
Patchin, J. W. & Hinduja, S. (2016). Deterring teen bullying: Assessing the impact of perceived punishment from police, schools and parents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1541204016681057.Google Scholar
Pikas, A. (1989). A pure conception of mobbing gives the best for treatment. School Psychology International, 10, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pikas, A. (2002). New developments of the shared concern method. School Psychology International, 23, 307–326.Google Scholar
Rigby, K. & Griffiths, C. (2010). Applying the Method of Shared Concern in Australian schools: An Evaluative Study. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. www.deewr.gov.au/schooling/nationalsafeschools/pages/research.aspx.Google Scholar
Robinson, G. & Maines, B. (2007). Bullying: A Complete Guide to the Support Group Method. Bristol: Lucky Duck Publishing.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K. & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandhu, D. & Kaur, S. (2016). Reducing cyber-bullying and problem behaviors among students through parental group therapy. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 31(2), 383–401.Google Scholar
Sharp, S. & Smith, P. K. (eds.) (1994). How to Tackle Bullying in Your School: A Practical Handbook for Teachers. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Howard, S. & Thompson, F. (2007). Use of the support group method to tackle bullying, and evaluation from schools and local authorities in England. Pastoral Care in Education, 25, 4–13.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Kupferberg, A., Mora-Merchan, J. A., Samara, M., Bosley, S. & Osborn, R. (2012). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: A follow-up after six years. Educational Psychology in Practice, 28, 61–84.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R. & Slee, P. (1999). The Nature of School Bullying: A Cross-National Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. & Sharp, S. (eds.) (1994). School Bullying: Insights and Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Smith, C., Osborn, R. & Samara, M. (2008). A content analysis of school anti-bullying policies: Progress and limitations. Educational Psychology in Practice, 24, 1–12.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K. & Watson, D. (2004). Evaluation of the CHIPS (ChildLine in Partnership with Schools) programme. Research report RR570, DfES.Google Scholar
Thompson, F. & Smith, P. K. (2011). The use and effectiveness of anti-bullying strategies in schools. DFE-RR098.Google Scholar
Ttofi, M. M. & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.Google Scholar
Weare, K. (2013). Developing mindfulness with children and young people: A review of the evidence and policy context. Journal of Children’s Services, 8(2), 141–153.Google Scholar
Welsh, B. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2008). Effects of closed circuit television surveillance on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 17. www.crim.cam.ac.uk/people/academic_research/david_farrington/cctv.pdf.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by