Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools Comparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives
Book contents
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Part I Issues in Studying Cross-National Differences
- Part II Comparative Data on Bullying
- 5 Cyberviolence and Cyberbullying in Europe and India
- 6 Cyberbullying in Higher Education in India and France
- 7 Participant Roles in Bullying
- 8 Bullying, Defending and Victimization in Western Europe and India
- 9 Defining the Relationship between Risk-Taking and Bullying during Adolescence
- Part III Working with Students and Teachers
- Part IV Commentaries from North America
- Index
- References
9 - Defining the Relationship between Risk-Taking and Bullying during Adolescence
A Cross-Cultural Comparison
from Part II - Comparative Data on Bullying
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2018
Book contents
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in Schools
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Preface
- Part I Issues in Studying Cross-National Differences
- Part II Comparative Data on Bullying
- 5 Cyberviolence and Cyberbullying in Europe and India
- 6 Cyberbullying in Higher Education in India and France
- 7 Participant Roles in Bullying
- 8 Bullying, Defending and Victimization in Western Europe and India
- 9 Defining the Relationship between Risk-Taking and Bullying during Adolescence
- Part III Working with Students and Teachers
- Part IV Commentaries from North America
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bullying, Cyberbullying and Student Well-Being in SchoolsComparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives, pp. 166 - 186Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28, 12–29.Google Scholar
Camodeca, M. & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Children’s opinions on effective strategies to cope with bullying: The importance of bullying role and perspective. Educational Research, 47, 93–105.Google Scholar
Casey, B. J. (2015). Beyond simplistic models of self-control to circuit-based accounts of adolescent behaviour. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 295–319.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A. & Cappotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.Google Scholar
Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W. & Taradash, A. (2000). Dating experiences of bullies in early adolescence. Child Maltreatment, 5, 288–310.Google Scholar
Crone, E. A. & Dahl, R. E. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 636–650.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A. & Albert, D. (2012). Evolving science in adolescence: Comment on Ellis et al. (2012). Developmental Psychology, 48, 624–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, F. J., Craig, W., Boyce, W., Morgan, A. & Vella-Zarb, R. (2009). Income inequality and school bullying: Multilevel study of adolescents in 37 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 351–359.Google Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to the environment: An evolutionary neurodevelopmental theory. Developmental and Psychopathology, 23, 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., … & Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598–623.Google Scholar
Gardner, M. & Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Giedd, J. N., Lalonde, F. M., Celano, M. J., White, S. L., Wallace, G. L., Lee, N. R. & Lenroot, R. K. (2009). Anatomical brain magnetic resonance imaging of typically developing children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48, 465–470.Google Scholar
Giedd, J. N., Raznahan, A., Mills, K. L. & Lenroot, R. K. (2012). Magnetic resonance imaging of male/female differences in human adolescent brain anatomy. Biology of Sex Differences, 3, 19.Google Scholar
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B. & Altoe, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T. & Dekker, P. (2006). The new participant role scales: A comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343–357.Google Scholar
Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132.Google Scholar
Hoza, B. (2007). Peer functioning in children with ADHD. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 32, 655–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A. B., van Duijn, M. A. J. & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 645–659.Google Scholar
Kaur, K. (2017). Drug abuse! Problem is intense in Punjab, India. Human Biology Review, 6, 20–29.Google Scholar
Kloep, M., Güney, N., Çok, F. & Simsek, Ö. F. (2009). Motives for risk-taking in adolescence: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 135–151.Google Scholar
Kshirsagar, V. Y., Agarwal, R. & Bavdekar, S. B. (2007). Bullying in schools: Prevalence and short-term impact. Indian Pediatrics, 44(1), 25–28.Google ScholarPubMed
LaFontana, K. M. & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19, 130–147.Google Scholar
Laslett, R. (1980). Bullies: A children’s court in a day school for maladjusted children. Journal of Special Education, 4, 391–397.Google Scholar
Lee, N. C., de Groot, R. H. M., Boschloo, A., Dekker, S., Krabbendam, L. & Jolles, J. (2013). Age and educational track influence adolescent discounting of delayed rewards. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 993.Google Scholar
Lion, R. & Meertens, R. M. (2005). Security or opportunity: The influence of risk-taking tendency on risk information preference. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 283–294.Google Scholar
Meertens, R. M. & Lion, M. (2008). Measuring an individual’s tendency to take risks: The risk propensity scale. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1506–1520.Google Scholar
Mills, K. L., Goddings, A.-L., Clasen, L. S., Giedd, J. N. & Blakemore, S.-J. (2014). The developmental mismatch in structural brain maturation during adolescence. Developmental Neuroscience, 36, 147–160.Google Scholar
Mills, K. L., Goddings, A.-L., Herting, M. M., Meuwese, R., Blakemore, S.-J., Crone, E. A., … Tamnes, C. K. (2016). Structural brain development between childhood and adulthood: Convergence across four longitudinal samples. Neuroimage, 141, 273–281.Google Scholar
O’Brien, L., Albert, D., Chein, J. & Steinberg, L. (2011). Adolescents prefer more immediate rewards when in the presence of their peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 747–753.Google Scholar
Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A. & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behaviour: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339–359.Google Scholar
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What We Know and What We Can Do. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pickett, K. E. & Wilkinson, R.G. (2007). Child wellbeing and income inequality in rich societies: Ecological cross-sectional study. British Medical Journal, 335, 1080–1087.Google Scholar
Pollak, S. D. (2008). Mechanisms linking early experience and the emergence of emotions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 370–375.Google Scholar
Poon, K. (2016). Understanding risk-taking behaviour in bullies, victims, and bully-victims using cognitive- and emotion-focused approaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1838.Google Scholar
Pouwels, J. L., Lansu, T. A. M. & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2016). Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behaviour, and assignment criteria. Aggressive Behaviour, 42, 239–253.Google Scholar
Pozzoli, T. & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827.Google Scholar
Pronk, J., Lee, N. C., Sandhu, D., Kaur, K., Kaur, S., Olthof, T. & Goossens, F. A. (2016). Associations between Dutch and Indian adolescents’ bullying role behavior and peer group status: Cross-culturally testing an evolutionary hypothesis. International Journal of Behavorial Development, 41, 735–742.Google Scholar
Reintjes, A., Vermande, M. M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., van der Schoot, R., Aleva, E. A. & van der Meulen, M. (2013a). Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 224–234.Google Scholar
Reintjes, A., Vermande, M. M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., van der Schoot, R., Aleva, L. & van der Meulen, M. (2013b). Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of the peer group: A three wave longitudinal analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1217–1229.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 15, 112–120.Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkvist, K., Österman, K. & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, R. H. J., Engels, R. C. M. E., Overbeek, G., van de Kemp, R. A. T. & Haselager, G. J. T. (2007). Stability in bullying and victimisation and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seals, D. & Young, J. (2003). Bullying and victimization: Prevalence and relationship to gender, grade level, ethnicity, self-esteem, and depression. Adolescence, 38, 735–747.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, A. P. D., Liefooghe, A., Almeida, A., Araki, H., … Wenxin, Z. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Development, 73, 1119–1133.Google Scholar
Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55.Google Scholar
Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S. & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying is power: Implications for school based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176.Google Scholar
Van Hoorn, J., Fuligni, A. J., Crone, E. A. & Galván, A. (2016). Peer influence effects on risk-taking and prosocial decision-making in adolescence: Insights from neuroimaging studies. Current Opinion in Behavioural Sciences, 10, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, A. A., Camilleri, J. A., Dane, A. V. & Marini, Z. A. (2012). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? Aggressive Behavior, 38, 222–238.Google Scholar
Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V. & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34, 327–343.Google Scholar
Walden, L. M. & Beran, T. N. (2010). Attachment quality and bullying behaviour in school-aged youth. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25, 5–18.Google Scholar
Witvliet, M., Olthof, T., Hoeksma, J. B., Goossens, F. A., Smits, M. S. I. & Koot, H. M. (2010). Peer group affiliation of children: The role of perceived popularity, likeability, an behavioural similarity in bullying. Social Development, 19, 285–303.Google Scholar