Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-8hm5d Total loading time: 0.741 Render date: 2022-05-27T07:34:57.646Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

1 - Awareness, Salience, and Stereotypes in Exemplar-Based Models of Speech Production and Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2016

Anna M. Babel
Ohio State University
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abbot-Smith, Kirsten and Tomasello, Michael 2006. Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. Linguistic Review 23:275–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addington, David. W. 1968. The relationship of selected vocal characteristics to personality perception. Speech Monographs 35:492503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronovitch, Charles D. 1976. The voice of personality: Stereotyped judgments and their relation to voice quality and sex of speaker. Journal of Social Psychology 99(2):207–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babel, Molly 2010. Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society 39(4):437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13(2):145204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bern, Daryl J. 1972. Self-perception theory, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6, pp. 162. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boomershine, Amanda, Hall, Kathleen Currie, Hume, Elizabeth, and Johnson, Keith 2005. The impact of allophony versus contrast on speech perception, in Avery, P., Dresher, B. E., and Rice, K. (eds.), Contrast in Phonology: Theory, Perception, Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard Y. and Giles, Howard 1977. The language of intergroup distinctiveness, in Giles, H. (ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, pp. 119–35. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Bowers, Kenneth 1984. On being unconsciously influenced and informed, in Bowers, K. S. and Meichenbaum, D. (eds.), The Unconscious Reconsidered, pp. 227–72. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Brooks, Lee R. 1978. Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances, in Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. B. (eds.), Cognition and Concepts, pp. 169211. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 1995. From Mulatta to Mestiza: Passing and the linguistic reshaping of ethnic identity, in Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and Socially Constructed Self, pp. 351–74. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society 28(2):203–23.Google Scholar
Busby, Linda. J. 1976. Myths, symbols, stereotypes: The artist and the mass media. Paper presented at the national meeting of the Speech Communication Association. San Francisco, CA.
Busselle, Rick W. 2003. Television exposure, parents’ precautionary warnings, and young adults’ perceptions of crime. Communication Research 30(5):530–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14:261–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Cacoullos, Rena Torres 2008. Phonological and grammatical variation in exemplar models. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1(2):399413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82:3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabris, Christopher and Simons, Daniel 2009. The Invisible Gorilla: And Other Ways Our Intuitions Deceive Us. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 1980. Style-shifting in a Cardiff work-setting. Language in Society 9(1):112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, Fergus I. M. and Kirsner, Kim 1974. The effect of speaker’s voice on word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 26(2):274–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. and Foulkes, Paul 2014. An evaluation of usage-based approaches to the modelling of sociophonetic variability. Lingua 142:4256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie 2005. The influence of social characteristics on speech perception. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Canterbury.
Drager, Katie 2009. A sociophonetic ethnography of Selwyn Girls’ High. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Canterbury.
Drager, Katie 2010. Sensitivity to grammatical and sociophonetic variability in perception. Laboratory Phonology 1(1):93120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie 2011a. Sociophonetic variation and the lemma. Journal of Phonetics 39(4):694707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie 2011b. Speaker age and vowel perception. Language and Speech 54(1):99121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drager, Katie and Hay, Jennifer 2012. Exploiting random intercepts: Two case studies in Sociophonetics. Language Variation and Change 24(1):5978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drager, Katie, Hay, Jennifer, and Walker, Abby 2010a. Pronounced rivalries: Attitudes and speech production. Te Reo 53:2753.Google Scholar
Drager, Katie, Salter, Carly, and Macinkowicz, Megan 2010b. Perceived style, sexuality, and pitch: An experimental approach. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 39. San Antonio, TX.
Eagly, Alice H., Mladinic, Antonio, and Otto, Stacey 1994. Cognitive and affective bases of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30:113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erker, Daniel and Guy, Gregory R. 2012. The role of lexical frequency in syntactic variability: Variable subject personal pronoun expression in Spanish. Language 88(3):526–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazio, Russell H. 1990. Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework, in Zanna, M. P. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 23, pp. 75109. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Michele 1995. “Are you with me?”: Power and solidarity in the discourse of African American women, in Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (eds.), Gender Articulated: Language and the Socially Constructed Self, pp. 329–50. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul and Docherty, Gerard 2006. The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4):409–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie, Bartlett, Kathryn, and Kreuz, Roger 2004. Do you hear what I hear? Experimental measurement of the perceptual salience of acoustically manipulated vowel variants by Southern speakers in Memphis, TN. Language Variation and Change 16:116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, Susanne 2008. “Time” and “thyme” are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in a corpus of spontaneous speech. Language 84(3):474–96.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics 15:87105.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard, Coupland, Nikolas, and Coupland, Justine 1991. Accomodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence, in Giles, H., Coupland, N., and Coupland, J. (eds.), Contexts of Accommodation: Developments in Applied Sociolinguistics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobl, Christer and Chasaide, Ailbhe Ní 2003. The role of voice quality in communicating emotion, mood and attitude. Speech Communication 40(1):189212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D. 1997. Words and voices: Perception and production in an episodic lexicon, in Johnson, K. and Mullennix, J. W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, pp. 3366. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D. 2007. A complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Greenberg, Bradley S., Mastro, Dana, and Brand, Jeffrey E. 2002. Minorities and the mass media: Television into the 21st century, in Jennings, B. and Zillmann, D. (eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 333–51. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G. and Banaji, Mahzarin R. 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102(1):427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddock, Geoffrey, Zanna, Mark P., and Esses, Victoria M. 1993. Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: The case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65:1105–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, David L. and Trolier, Tina K. 1986. Stereotypes and stereotyping: An overview of the cognitive approach, in Gaerner, S. L. and Dovidio, J. F. (eds.), Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism, pp. 127–57. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harms, L. Stanley 1961. Listener judgments of status cues in speech. Quarterly Journal of Speech 47(2):164–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Drager, Katie 2010. Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4):865–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Drager, Katie, and Thomas, Brynmor 2013. Using nonsense words to investigate vowel merger. English Language and Linguistics 17(2):241–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Drager, Katie, and Warren, Paul 2010. Short-term exposure to one dialect affects processing of another. Language and Speech 53(4):447–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer and Maclagan, Margaret 2010. Social and phonetic conditioners on the frequency and degree of “intrusive/r/” in New Zealand English, in Preston, D. R. and Niedzielski, N. A. (eds.), A Reader in Sociophonetics, pp. 4170. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Nolan, Aaron, and Drager, Katie 2006a. From fush to feesh: Exemplar priming in speech perception. Linguistic Review 23(3):351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Warren, Paul, and Drager, Katie 2006b. Factors influencing speech perception in the context of a merger-in-progress. Journal of Phonetics 34(4):458–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintzman, Douglas L. 1984. MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 16(2):96101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintzman, Douglas L. 1986. “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 93:411–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hintzman, Douglas L. and Ludlam, Genevieve 1980. Differential forgetting of prototypes and old instances: Simulation by an exemplar-based classification model. Memory & Cognition 8(4):378–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogg, Michael and Vaughan, Graham 2008. Social Psychology. 5th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick and Watson, Kevin 2013. Salience and the sociolinguistics of Scouse spelling. English World-Wide 34(3):305–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar approach, in Johnson, K. and Mullennix, J. W. (eds.), Talker Variability in Speech Processing, pp. 145–66. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2005. Speaker normalization, in Remez, R. E. and Pisoni, D. B. (eds.), The Handbook of Speech Perception, pp. 363–89. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2006. Resonance in an exemplar-based lexicon: The emergence of social identity and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4):485–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith 2007. Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology, in Sole, M.-J., Beddor, P., and Ohala, M. (eds.), Experimental Approaches to Phonology. In Honor of John Ohala. pp. 2540. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara 2009. Stance, style, and the linguistic individual, in Jaffe, A. (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, pp. 2952. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiesling, Scott 2009. Style as stance: Can stance be the primary explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation?, in Jaffe, A. (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, pp. 171–94. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kirtley, M. Joelle 2010. Speech in the US military: A sociophonetic perception approach to identity and meaning. MA thesis. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.
Klatt, Dennis H. 1979. Speech perception: A model of acoustic-phonetic analysis and lexical access. Journal of Phonetics 7(312):126.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian, Gentry, Elizabeth, and Pantos, Andrew 2008. The effect of perceived speaker age on the perception of PIN and PEN vowels in Houston, Texas. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 34(2):93101.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore and Jørgensen, Jens Normann 2005. Subjective factors in dialect convergence and divergence, in Auer, P., Hinskens, F., and Kerswill, P. (eds.), Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, pp. 287302. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Pittsburg, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William 1974. Linguistic change as a form of communication, in Silverstein, A. (ed.), Human Communication: Theoretical Explorations, pp. 221–56. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Labov, William 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change: Social factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej, and Nagy, Naomi 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:431–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacerda, Francisco 1995. The perceptual-magnet effect: An emergent consequence of exemplar-based phonetic memory. Proceedings of the 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2.
Lamme, Victor A. F. 2003. Why visual attention and awareness are different. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(1):1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levon, Erez 2011. Teasing apart to bring together: Gender and sexuality in variationist research. American Speech 86(1):6984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewicki, Pawel 1986. Nonconscious Social Information Processing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, Matthew D. 2003. Reflexive and reflective judgment processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach, in Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. D., and von Hippel, W. (eds.), Social Judgments: Implicit and Explicit Processes, pp. 134. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, James L. and Elman, Jeffrey L. 1986. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18(1):186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLennan, Conor. T. 2007. Challenges facing a complementary-systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pp. 67–70. Saarbrücken, Germany.
McQueen, James M., Cutler, Anne, and Norris, Dennis 2006. Phonological abstraction in the mental lexicon. Cognitive Science 30(6):1113–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, J. Bruce and Trehub, Sandra E. 2001. Children’s understanding of emotion in speech. Child Development 72(3):834–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):6285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Kuniko 2011. Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics 39(2):132–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Dennis, McQueen, James M., and Cutler, Anne 2003. Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology 47(2):204–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1986. Attention, similarity, and identification- categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology 115(1):3957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1991. Stimulus bias, asymmetric similarity, and classification. Cognitive Psychology 23:94140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosofsky, Robert M. 1992. Exemplars, prototypes, and similarity rules, in Healy, A. F. and Kosslyn, S. M. (eds.), Essays in Honor of William K. Estes, Vol. 1: From Learning Theory to Connectionist Theory; Vol. 2: From Learning Processes to Cognitive Processes, pp. 149–67. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nosofsky, Robert M., Little, Daniel R., Donkin, Christopher, and Fific, Mario 2011. Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Psychological Review 118(2):280315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nosofsky, Robert M., Palmeri, Thomas J., and McKinley, Stephen C. 1994. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review 101(1):5379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nygaard, Lynne C. and Lunders, Erin R. 2002. Resolution of lexical ambiguity by emotional tone of voice. Memory and Cognition 30(4):583–93.Google Scholar
O’Regan, J. Kevin and Noё, Alva 2001. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:9391031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmeri, Thomas J., Goldinger, Stephen D., and Pisoni, David B. 1993. Episodic encoding of voice attributes and recognition memory for spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(2):309–28.Google ScholarPubMed
Pierrehumbert, Janet 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast, in Bybee, J. and Hopper, P. (eds.), Frequency Effects and Emergent Grammar, pp. 137–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet 2006. The next toolkit. Journal of Phonetics 34(6):516–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattabhiraman, Thiyagarajasarma and Cercone, Nick 1990. Selection: Salience, relevance and the coupling between domain-level tasks and text planning, in McKeown, K., Moore, J., and Nierenburg, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, pp. 7986. Dawson, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Plug, Leendert 2005. Phonetic reduction and categorisation in exemplar-based representation. Proceedings of ConSOLE 13, pp. 287–311.
Podesva, Robert 2008. Three sources of stylistic meaning, in Edwards, T., Shaw, K., Wagner, S., and Yasui, E. (eds.), Proceedings of SALSA15. Texas Linguistic Forum 51. Austin, TX: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert 2011. Salience and the social meaning of declarative contours: Three case studies of gay professionals. Journal of English Linguistics 39(3):233–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, Dennis 2010. Variation in language regard, in Gilles, P., Scharloth, I., and Zeigler, E. (eds.), Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, pp. 727. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis 2011. The power of language regard: Discrimination, classification, comprehension and production. Dialectologia Special Issue II:9–33.
Prince, Ellen F. 1988. Accommodation theory and dialect shift: A case study from Yiddish. Language and Communication 8(3):307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Racz, Peter 2013. Salience in Sociolinguistics: A Quantitative Approach. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickford, John and McNair-Knox, Faye 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study, in Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, pp. 235–76. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schacter, Daniel L., Eich, James Eric, and Tulving, Endel 1978. Richard Semon’s theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 17(6):721–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Richard W. 1990. The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics 11(2):129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Walter and Shiffrin, Richard M. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84(1):127–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Michael A. 1991. Memory and decision processes in the construction of social reality. Communication Research 18(1):324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shastri, Lokendra and Ajjanagadde, Venkat 1993. From simple associations to systematic reasoning: A connectionist representation of rules, variables and dynamic bindings using temporal synchrony. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16(3):417–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Jeffrey W. 1996. Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(6):1126–41.Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. 1998. Mental representation and memory, in Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 1, pp. 391445. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Smith, Eliot R. and Zárate, Michael A. 1992. Exemplar-based model of social judgement. Psychological Review 99(1):321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staum Casasanto, Laura 2008. Does social information influence sentence processing? 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Washington, DC.
Strand, Elizabeth 1999. Uncovering the role of gender stereotypes in speech perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):8699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, Meghan, Kim, Seung Kyung, King, Ed, and McGowan, Kevin 2014. The socially weighted encoding of spoken words: A dual-route approach to speech perception. Frontiers in Psychology 4:1015. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01015.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trudgill, Peter 1981. Linguistic accommodation: Sociolinguistic observations on a sociopsychological theory, in Masek, C. S., Hendrick, R. A., and Miller, M. F. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, pp. 218–37. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Walker, Abby 2008. Phonetic detail and grammaticality judgments. Unpublished MA thesis. University of Canterbury.
Wedel, Andrew B. 2006. Exemplar models, evolution and language change. Linguistic Review 23(3):247–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, Malcah 1993. Linguistic analysis of dialect “correction” and its interaction with cognitive salience. Language Variation and Change 5:189224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Qing 2005. A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34(3):431–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf and Brosius, Hans-Bernd 2000. Exemplification in communication. Zeitschrift fur Medien-psychologie 13(3):155–6.Google Scholar
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats