Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-bjz6k Total loading time: 0.503 Render date: 2022-05-24T16:19:57.761Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2012

Enid Campbell
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
H. P. Lee
Affiliation:
Monash University, Victoria
Get access

Summary

[T]he judiciary is the one branch of government which is an unlikely candidate as despot; despite the great powers which it is capable of exercising, especially in the area of judicial review, it remains very much at the mercy of the other arms of government.

The Rt Hon Sir Ninian Stephen

The importance of the judiciary

In a democracy, constitutional government is ensured by a system of checks and balances. In his 1908 analysis of the notion of constitutional government, Dr Woodrow Wilson identified among the essential elements and institutions of a constitutional system, ‘[a] judiciary with substantial and independent powers, secure against all corrupting or perverting influences; secure, also, against the arbitrary authority of the government itself’. Dr Wilson went on to describe the courts as the ‘balance-wheel’ of a constitutional system. He described the importance of a judicial forum in the preservation of the liberty of the individual and the integrity of the government in the following terms:

There the individual may assert his rights; there the government must accept definition of its authority. There the individual may challenge the legality of governmental action and have it judged by the test of fundamental principles, and that test the government must abide; there the government can check the too aggressive self-assertion of the individual and establish its power upon lines which all can comprehend and heed. The constitutional powers of the courts constitute the ultimate safeguard alike of individual privilege and of governmental prerogative. It is in this sense that our judiciary is the balance-wheel of our entire system; it is meant to maintain that nice adjustment between individual rights and governmental powers which constitutes political liberty.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Stephen, NSouthey Memorial Lecture 1981: Judicial Independence – A Fragile Bastion 1982 13 Melbourne University Law Review334Google Scholar
Wilson, WConstitutional Government in the United StatesColumbia University Press 1908 24Google Scholar
1970
1992
1992
Lee, H PThe Implied Freedom of Political CommunicationLee, H PWinterton, GAustralian Constitutional LandmarksCambridge University Press 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lord SteynDemocracy, the Rule of Law and the Role of Judges 2006 European Human Rights Law Review243Google Scholar
1951
Winterton, GThe Communist Party CaseLee, H PWinterton, GAustralian Constitutional LandmarksCambridge University Press 2003 108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, SJudges on TrialNorth-Holland Publishing Co 1976 3Google Scholar
Campbell, EJudges at the Bar of Parliament 1999 18 Australian Bar Review63Google Scholar
Friedland, M LA Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in CanadaCanadian Judicial Council 1995 3Google Scholar
1988
1951
1979
2000
2003
2007
2005
2010
Mason, AA New Perspective on Separation of Powers 1996 82 Canberra Bulletin of Public Administration1Google Scholar
Dicey, A VAn Introduction to the Study of the Law of the ConstitutionMacmillan 1959 202Google Scholar
Raz, JThe Rule of Law and Its Virtue 1977 93 Law Quarterly Review195Google Scholar
Thomas, J BJudicial Ethics in AustraliaLexisNexis Butterworths 2009 331Google Scholar
Campbell, EOaths and Affirmation of Public Office 2000 21 Journal of Legal History1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The New Zealand Law Commission 2011
Mason, AThe Independence of the Bench, the Independence of the Bar and the Bar’s Role in the Judicial System’ 1993 10 Australian Bar Review1Google Scholar
Lamer, AThe Rule of Law and Judicial Independence: Protecting Core Values in Times of Change 1996 45 University of New Brunswick Law Journal3Google Scholar
Shetreet, SJudicial Independence and Accountability: Core Values in Liberal DemocraciesLee, H PJudiciaries in Comparative PerspectiveCambridge University Press 2011 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, SDeschenes, JulesJudicial Independence: The Contemporary DebateMartinus Nijhoff 1985
Warren, MDoes Judicial Independence Matter? 2011 85 Australian Law Journal481Google Scholar
McGarvie, R EThe Foundations of Judicial Independence in a Modern Democracy 1991 1 Journal of Judicial Administration3Google Scholar
Shetreet, SThe Limits of Judicial Accountability: A Hard Look at the Judicial Officers Act 1986 1987 University of New South Wales Law Journal4Google Scholar
Shetreet, SJudicial Independence and Accountability: Core Values in Liberal democraciesLee, H PJudiciaries in Comparative PerspectiveCambridge University Press 2011 3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarvie, R EThe Foundations of Judicial Independence in a Modern Democracy 1991 1 Journal of Judicial Administration3Google Scholar
McGarvie, R EThe Ways Available to the Judicial Arm of Government to Preserve Judicial Independence 1992 1 Journal of Judicial Administration236Google Scholar
Sturgess, GChubb, PJudging the World, Law and Politics in the World’s Leading CourtsButterworths 1988 353Google Scholar
1982
Brennan, GerardPartiality and the appearance of partiality are both incompatible with the proper exercise of judicial power. The one poisons the stream of justice at its source; the other dries it up’: ‘The State of the Judicature 1998 72 Australian Law Journal33Google Scholar
Nicholson, R DJudicial Independence and Accountability – Can They Coexist? 1993 67 Australian Law Journal404Google Scholar
Lord Taylor of GosforthThe Independence of the Judiciary in a Democracy 1995 4 Asia Pacific Law Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenny, SMaintaining Public Confidence in the Judiciary 1999 25 Monash University Law Review209Google Scholar
Friedland, M LA Place Apart: Judicial Independence and Accountability in CanadaCanadian Judicial Council 1995 18Google Scholar
Kirby, MAbolition of Courts and Non-reappointment of Judicial Officers 1995 12 Australian Bar Review181Google Scholar
Winterton, GJudicial Remuneration in AustraliaAustralian Institute of Judicial Administration 1995 12Google Scholar
King, L JMinimum Standards of Judicial Independence 1984 58 Australian Law Journal340Google Scholar
Malcolm, DThe Beijing Statement of Principles of the Independence of the Judiciary in the LAWASIA Region 1996 70 Australian Law Journal299Google Scholar
1997 15 Australian Bar Review175
Brennan, GDeclaration of Principles on Judicial Independence 1996 15 Australian Bar Review175Google Scholar
1846
1849
1984
Kirby, MJudges Under Attack 1994 38 Quadrant11Google Scholar
Kirby, MAttacks on Judges – A Universal Phenomenon 1998 72 Australian Law Journal599Google Scholar
1992 53
Australian Bar AssociationThe Independence of the Judiciary 1991 77 Victorian Bar News18Google Scholar
Commission on Separation of Powers and Judicial IndependenceAn Independent JudiciaryAmerican Bar Association 1997Google Scholar
Lord Taylor of GosforthLord Chief Justice of EnglandThe Independence of the Judiciary in a Democracy 1995 4 Asia Pacific Law Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, MJudicial Independence in Australia Reaches a Moment of Truth 1990 13 University of New South Wales Law Journal187Google Scholar
1984
1984
1985
Blackshield, A RThe “Murphy Affair”Scutt, J AA Radical JudgeMcCulloch Publishing 1987 248Google Scholar
Lush, GeorgeBlackburn, RichardWells, AndrewRe The Honourable Mr Justice Murphy – Ruling on Meaning of “Misbehaviour” 1986 2 Australian Bar Review203Google Scholar
Lindell, GThe Murphy Affair in RetrospectLee, H PWinterton, GAustralian Constitutional LandmarksCambridge University Press 2003Google Scholar
Lee, H PMorabito, VRemoval of Judges – The Australian Experience 1992 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies40Google Scholar
First Report of the Parliamentary Judges Commission of InquiryGovernment Printer, Brisbane 1989
Morabito, VAre Australian Judges Accountable? 1994 1 Canberra Law Review73Google Scholar
Kirby, MAbolition of Courts and Non-reappointment of Judicial Officers 1995 12 Australian Bar Review181Google Scholar
Campbell, EGroves, MAttacks on Judges under Parliamentary Privilege: A Sorry Australian Episode 2002 Public Law626Google Scholar
Brown, A JMichael Kirby – Paradoxes and PrinciplesFederation Press 2011 319Google Scholar
2008
2008
Young, P WSuitability for the Bench 2011 85 Australian Law Journal463Google Scholar
Evans, RichardYeldham – Awkward Questions Remain 1997 32 Australian Lawyer10Google Scholar
Guide to Judicial ConductAustralasian Institute of Judicial Administration Incorporated 2007
Hayne, KLetting Justice Be Done Without the Heavens Falling 2001 Monash University Law ReviewMonash UniversityGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, R DJudicial Independence and Judicial Accountability – Can They Coexist? 1993 67 Australian Law Journal404Google Scholar
2008

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Enid Campbell, Monash University, Victoria, H. P. Lee, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: The Australian Judiciary
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028431.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Enid Campbell, Monash University, Victoria, H. P. Lee, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: The Australian Judiciary
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028431.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Enid Campbell, Monash University, Victoria, H. P. Lee, Monash University, Victoria
  • Book: The Australian Judiciary
  • Online publication: 05 December 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028431.002
Available formats
×