Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7mfl8 Total loading time: 0.428 Render date: 2021-12-05T18:49:59.059Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

8 - Auctions of gas transmission access: the British experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Tanga Morae McDaniel
Affiliation:
Economist at the Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge University
Karsten Neuhoff
Affiliation:
PhD student, Cambridge University
Maarten Janssen
Affiliation:
Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam
Get access

Summary

Introduction

An essential component of most utility industries is the network that transfers the commodity (e.g. gas, electrons, data, water) between producers and consumers. Frequently the supply of the commodity cannot meet demand either because of constraints within the network or because of insufficient capacity at points where the commodity is inserted or withdrawn. At these times producers or demand may be rationed. Producers at transport-constrained locations may be replaced by producers at unconstrained locations. Rationing on the demand side can be voluntary, based on price signals or based on interruptible contracts, or it can be involuntary, as occurs during times of rolling blackouts and unanticipated crashes of departmental computer servers. To determine who is rationed first, or, alternatively, who bears the costs of rescheduling production in order to match transmission constraints, we have to identify who owns the rights to the use of the network. Such rights can be implicit, granting unlimited access, explicit, guaranteeing a certain amount of physical delivery, or financial, compensating for costs incurred due to transmission constraints.

The question of transmission rights is of relevance once vertically integrated gas, electricity or water utilities are unbundled such that competing enterprises want to use scarce parts of the network. The successors of previously integrated utilities frequently argue that historic flow patterns guarantee an implicit right to continue similiar use of the transmission network.

Type
Chapter
Information
Auctioning Public Assets
Analysis and Alternatives
, pp. 197 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, M., S. Cowan and J. Vickers 1994, Regulatory Reform, Economic Analysis and British Experience, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
Bulow, J. and P. Klemperer, 2000 ‘Prices and the winner's curse’, Working Paper, http://www.nuff.ox.ac.uk/users/klemperer/papers.html (accessed at 8 February 2003)
Dasgupta, P. and Maskin, E. 1998, ‘Efficient auctions’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 341–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Trade and Industry 2001, UK Energy in Brief, A publication of the Government Statistical Service, UK. Available at http://www.dti.gov.uk
Hawdon, D. and Stevens, N. 2001, ‘Regulatory reform of the UK gas market: the case of the storage auctions’, Fiscal Studies 222: 217–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. 2001, ‘MSEC network analysis’, System Operation, Transco
Milgrom, P. and Weber, R. 1982, ‘A theory of auctions and competitive bidding’, Econometrica 50: 1089–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, T. 2003, ‘Auctioning access to networks: evidence and expectations’, Utilities Policy, forthcoming
McDaniel, T. and K. Neuhoff, 2002, Entry Capacity Auctions and Investment Signals, MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research Boston
Monopolies and Mergers Commission 1993, ‘Reports under the Gas Act 1986 on the conveyance and storage of gas and the fixing of tariffs for the supply of gas by British Gas plc’, London
Monopolies and Mergers Commission 1997, ‘BG plc: a report under the Gas Act 1986 on the restriction of prices for gas transportation and storage services’, London
Newbery, D. 1999, ‘Deriving long-run marginal cost tariffs using transcost’, mimeo, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge
Newbery, D. 2003, ‘Network capacity auctions: promise and problems’, Utilities Policy, forthcoming
Ofgem 1999a, ‘St Fergus and Bacton investigation: a report under Section 39(4) of the Gas Act 1986’, London
Ofgem 1999b, ‘The new gas trading arrangements: a review of the October 1999 NTS capacity auctions and consultation on developing the capacity regime’, London
Ofgem 2000, ‘The new gas trading arrangements: a review of the new arrangements and further development of the regime’, http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ (accessed at 8 February 2003)
Ofgem2001a, ‘Ofgem's investigation into shipper conduct in the capacity market in October 2000: conclusions’, http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/ (accessed at 8 February 2003)
Ofgem2001b, ‘Transco's national transmission system, system operator incentives 2002–7: final proposals’, London
Ofgem 2002, ‘Long-term entry capacity auctions: modification proposals 0500 “Long-term capacity allocation” and 0508 “A method of long-term capacity allocation”’, London
Oxera 2000, ‘Energy liberalization indicators in Europe: a consultation document based on a study carried out by Oxera for the governments of the UK and the Netherlands’, London
Platts 2001, ‘Revised charges since October 2000’, http://www.transco.uk.com/ (accessed at 8 February 2003)
Transco 1999, ‘Option for the mechanism to allocate terminal capacity in October 1999’, 1999-06-30, Solihull, West Midlands
Transco 2000, ‘Transport charges from 1 October 2000’, http://www.transco.uk.com/ (accessed at 8 February 2003)
Transco 2001, ‘The Network Code: version 2.26’, http://www.transco.uk.com/ (accessed at 8 February 2003)
Transco 2002, ‘Incremental Entry Capacity Release Statement: version 1.0’, Solihull, West Midlands
4
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×