Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-03T14:25:32.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Transitional Justice in the Colombian Final Accord

Text, Context, and Implementation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2019

James Meernik
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt
Affiliation:
University of North Texas
Mauricio Uribe-López
Affiliation:
EAFIT University (Medelin, Coloumbia)
Get access

Summary

The Colombian Final Accord is an innovative agreement, particularly with respect to the amount of overall content devoted to transitional justice, victims, and the emphasis on subsequent implementation (Herbolzheimer, 2016; Nylander, Sandberg, and Tvedt, 2018). Some of the most contentious issues in the negotiations that produced the accord were related to truth and reconciliation processes, prosecution and sentencing for war crimes, prisoners release, and amnesty, and the armed actors and negotiators showed great interest in learning from other peace processes. The overall end result of these efforts was the reaching of what is almost certainly the most victim-centered comprehensive peace agreement ever negotiated.1

Type
Chapter
Information
As War Ends
What Colombia Can Tell Us About the Sustainability of Peace and Transitional Justice
, pp. 207 - 229
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aloisi, Rosa, and Meernik, James. (2017). Judgment Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Binningsbø, Helga Malmin, Loyle, Cyanne E., Gates, Scott, and Elster, Jon. (2012). “Armed Conflict and Post-Conflict Justice, 1946–2006: A Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 49 (5), 731740.Google Scholar
Dancy, Geoff. (2018). “Deals with the Devil? Conflict Amnesties, Civil War, and Sustainable Peace.” International Organization 72 (2), 387421.Google Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla. (2008). “Negotiating Justice: The Challenge of Addressing Past Human Rights Violations,” in Darby, John, and MacGinty, Roger (eds.) 328338. Contemporary Peacemaking. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayner, Priscilla B. (2010). Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herbolzheimer, Kristian. (2016). Innovations in the Colombian peace process. NOREF Report.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, and Darby, John. (2013). “Introducing the Peace Accords Matrix (PAM): A Database of Comprehensive Peace Agreements and Their Implementation, 1989–2007.” Peacebuilding 1 (2), 256274.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, and Melander, Erik. (2017). “Explaining Demobilization in the Wake of Civil Conflict.” Peacebuilding 5 (3), 270288.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, and Pyakurel, Subodh Raj. (2015). “Individual-Level Data on the Victims of Nepal’s Civil War, 1996–2006: A New Data Set.” International Interactions 41 (3), 601619.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, Melander, Erik, and Quinn, Jason Michael. (2017). “Sequencing the Peace: How the Order of Peace Agreement Implementation Can Reduce the Destabilizing Effects of Post-Accord Elections.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (1), 428.Google Scholar
Joshi, Madhav, Quinn, Jason Michael, and Regan, Patrick M. (2015). “Annualized Implementation Data on Comprehensive Intrastate Peace Accords, 1989–2012.” Journal of Peace Research 52 (4), 551562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nylander, Dag, Sandberg, Rita, and Tvedt, Idun. (2018). Designing Peace: The Colombian Peace Process. NOREF Report.Google Scholar
Peace Accords Matrix. (2018). El Salvador. https://peaceaccords.nd.edu/accord/chapultepec-peace-agreement, Kroc Institute for International Peace Studies, University of Notre Dame (Accessed June 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn, and Walling, Carrie Booth. (2007). “The Impact Of Human Rights Trials in Latin America.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (4), 427445.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack, and Vinjamuri, Leslie. (2004). “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28 (3), 544.Google Scholar
United Nations, Rule of Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. 2009. HR/PUB/09/1, available at: www.refworld.org/docid/4a953bc82.html [accessed June 13, 2018].Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×