Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The semiotics of structure
- Chapter 2 Sed quid ego tam gloriose? Pliny's poetics of choice
- Chapter 3 The importance of being Secundus: Tacitus' voice in Pliny's letters
- Chapter 4 Storming historiography: Pliny's voice in Tacitus' text
- Chapter 5 Overcoming Ciceronian anxiety: Pliny's niche/nike in literary history
- From dawn till dusk: four notes in lieu of a conclusion
- Appendix to chapter 5
- List of works cited
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
List of works cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Preface
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The semiotics of structure
- Chapter 2 Sed quid ego tam gloriose? Pliny's poetics of choice
- Chapter 3 The importance of being Secundus: Tacitus' voice in Pliny's letters
- Chapter 4 Storming historiography: Pliny's voice in Tacitus' text
- Chapter 5 Overcoming Ciceronian anxiety: Pliny's niche/nike in literary history
- From dawn till dusk: four notes in lieu of a conclusion
- Appendix to chapter 5
- List of works cited
- General index
- Index locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Art of Pliny's LettersA Poetics of Allusion in the Private Correspondence, pp. 258 - 271Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
(1976) “Pliny and Martial.” Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestensis Sect. Class. 4: 63–72Google Scholar
(1971) “Plinius der Jüngere (cos. 100 n. Chr.). Jagdglück eines Schriftstellers,” in Meister römischer Prosa von Cato bis Apuleius. Interpretationen. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Die Inschriften des jüngeren Plinius und seine Mission in Pontus et Bithynia,” in Städte, Eliten und Gesellschaft in der Gallia Cisalpina. Epigraphisch-historische Untersuchungen. Stuttgart: 221–44Google Scholar
(1966) L'Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine, des origines à l’époque augustéenne. ParisGoogle Scholar
, and eds. (1996) Les loisirs et l'héritage de la culture classique: actes du ⅩⅢe congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé, Dijon, 27–31 aoÛt 1993. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
(1881) “Zur Chronologie der Briefe des jüngeren Plinius.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 36: 38–49Google Scholar
(1997) “Warped Intertextualities: Naevius and Sallust at Tacitus Histories 2.12.2.” Histos1Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2003) “Aliud est enim epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere (Epistles 6.16.22): Pliny the Historian?,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 211–26
(1989) “La correspondance de Pline le Jeune: Problèmes et orientations actuelles de la recherche.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 304–74Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2003) “Lusus und Gloria – Plinius’ Hendecasyllabi (Epist. 4, 14; 5, 3 und 7, 4),” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 3–13
(1951) Essai sur les chasses romaines, des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins. ParisGoogle Scholar
Baier, T. (2003) “KTHMA oder ΑΓωΝIΣΜΑ: Plinius über historischen und rhetorischen Stil,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 69–81
(2001a) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets. Trans. M. Fox and S. Marchesi. LondonGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001b) “The Crossing,” in S. J. Harrison ed.: 142–63
(1970) “La construction du ‘moi’ par la poésie,” in Propositions sur Catulle. Brussels: 131–40Google Scholar
(1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and the Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971) “Virgil's Influence on Tacitus in Book 3 of the Histories.” Classical Philology 66: 93–107Google Scholar
(1972) “Virgil's Influence on Tacitus in Books 1 and 2 of the Annals.” Classical Philology 67: 246–69Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2002) “Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters,” in Classics in Progress. ed. Oxford and New York: 103–44Google Scholar
(1989) “A Note on Revision and Authenticity in Pliny's Letters.” American Journal of Philology 110: 460–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Vergangenheit als Politik: Neue Aspeckte im Werk des jüngeren Plinius. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
(2000) Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny. Letters and Panegyric. Munich–LeipzigCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981) “The Gaze of Orpheus,” in The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays. Barrytown, NY.: 99–104Google Scholar
(1991) “Plinio Ep. Ⅶ 9, 11: un'affermazione letteraria in distici elegiaci.” Atene e Roma 36: 26–36Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1994) “Trimalchio's Underworld,” in The Search for the Ancient Novel. ed. Baltimore: 237–59Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1999) “The Cena Trimalchionis,” in Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context. ed. London and New York: 38–51Google Scholar
Braund, S. Morton. (1998) “Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny,” in The Propaganda of Power. ed. Leiden and Boston: 53–76Google Scholar
(1988) Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
(1976) “Catullus c. 50 als Programm und Bekenntnis.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 119: 162–80Google Scholar
(1970) Die geistige Welt des jüngeren Plinius: Studien zur Thematik seiner Briefe. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
(1999) [2000] “Latin Literature After A.D. 96: Change or Continuity?.” American Journal of Ancient History 15: 19–39Google Scholar
and (1989) “Imitazione e arte allusiva. Modi e funzioni dell'intertestualità,” in Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, 1. Rome: 81–114Google Scholar
(1972) “Arte allusiva e stilizzazione retorica nelle lettere di Plinio.” Aevum 46: 16–36Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (2003) “Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 95–122
(1931) “I diminutivi in Plinio Il Giovane.” Atti, Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 66: 93–130Google Scholar
(1990) “Poem Division, Paired Poems, and Amores 2.9 and 3.11.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 269–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pretis, A. (2004) “‘Epistolarity’ in the First Book of Horace's Epistles.” Piscataway, NJ
, , and eds. (1989) Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
(1999) The Invention of Literature: From Greek Intoxication to the Latin Book. Baltimore and LondonGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca's Letters.” Greece and Rome 44.1: 23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978a) “Imitation and Evolution: The Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero De oratore 2.87–97 and Some Related Problems of Ciceronian Theory.” Classical Philology 73.1: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978b) “Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ.” Classical Philology 73.2: 102–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (2002) “Greek Lives and Roman Careers in the Classical uita Tradition,” in European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance. and eds. Toronto: 24–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1991) “Bucolica, lirica, elegia,” in La poesia latina, ed. Florence: 77–131Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2004) “Le Lettere a Lucilio. Introduzione,” in Seneca: Una vicenda testuale. and eds. Florence: 203–9Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2002) “Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate and the Tradition of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus,” in D. Feeney and A. J. Woodman eds.: 172–86
(1990) “Psyche, Aeneas, and an Ass: Apuleius Metamorphoses 6.10–6.21.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 333–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Metamorphosis of Language in Apuleius: A Study of Allusion in the Novel. Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Historia proxima poetis: L'influence de la poésie épique sur le style des historiens latins de Sallust à Ammien Marcellin. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
(1997) “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies.” Materiali e Discussioni 39: 13–34 [= Roman Constructions, 115–37]Google Scholar
(1968) “On the Unity of Catullus 51.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 96: 153–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “Writing to/through Florus: Criticism and the Addressee in Horace Epistles 2.2.” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 47: 33–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Cicero and the Roman Republic. Trans. W. E. Yuill. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazich, R. (2003) “Retorica dell'esemplarità nelle Lettere di Plinio,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 123–41CrossRef
Gibson, R. (2003) “Pliny and the art of (in)offensive self-praise,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 235–54CrossRef
Gibson, R. (2009) “Elder and Better: The Natural History and the Letters of the Younger Pliny,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds., Pliny The Elder: Themes and Contexts. Brill
and eds. (2003) Re-Imagining Pliny the Younger. Baltimore (=Arethusa 36.2, special issue)Google Scholar
(1979) “Il racconto Pliniano dell'eruzione del Vesuvio dell'a. 79.” La Parola del Passato 188/9: 321–76Google Scholar
Giua, M. A. (2003) “Tacito e i suoi destinatari: storia per i contemporanei, storia per i posteri,” in Evento, racconto, scrittura nell'antichità classica. and , eds. Florence: 247–68Google Scholar
(1999) “Appreciating Aper: The Defence of Modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus.” Classical Quarterly 49.1: 224–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görler, W. (1979) “Kaltblütiges Schnarchen: Zum literarischen Hintergrund der Vesuvbriefe des jüngeren Plinius,” in Arktouros: Hellenic Studies presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the occasion of his 65th birthday, , and eds. Berlin and New York: 427–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and Trans. and . New YorkGoogle Scholar
(1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
(1997) “I diminutivi nell'epistolario di Plinio il Giovane. Una nota stilistica,” in Discentibus obvius. Omaggio degli allievi a Domenico Magnino. Como: 53–71Google Scholar
(1946) “La culture de Pline le Jeune,” in Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Felix Grat. Paris: 77–88Google Scholar
(1997) “Catullus, Pliny, and Love-Letters.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 201–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) “Fatal Attraction: Paris, Helen and the Unity of Catullus 51.” Classical Bulletin 77.2: 161–7Google Scholar
ed. (2001b) Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Aktuelle Probleme der Dialogus-Rezeption: Echtheitserweise und Lückenumfang.” Philologus 130: 63–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity. TorontoGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Pliny on Martial on Pliny on anon and on … (Epistles 3.21 / Epigrams 10.19).” Ramus 30: 56–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) “Knowing Someone Through Their Books: Pliny on Uncle Pliny (Epistles 3.5).” Classical Philology 97.3: 256–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (2003) “Portrait of the Artist as a Figure of Style: P. L. I.N.Y's LETTERS,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 115–25
Henderson, J. (2006) “Journey of a Lifetime: Seneca, Epistle 57 in Book Ⅵ of EM,” in K. Volk and G. Williams eds.: 123–46
(2005) “Poetic Influence on Prose: The Case of the Younger Seneca.” Proceedings of the British Academy 129: 211–37Google Scholar
(1985) “Ovid's Metamorphoses: Carmen Perpetuum, Carmen Deductum.” Paper of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 223–41Google Scholar
(1985) “In Defence of the Encyclopaedic Mode: on Pliny's Preface to the Natural History.” Latomus 44: 561–76Google Scholar
(2000) “Horace and Catullus: The Case of the Suppressed Precursor in Odes 1.22 and 1.32.” Classical World 94.1: 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) “Les Pontiques d'Ovide: la composition des trois premiers livres.” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 54: 19–26Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971) “Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances,” in and , Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: 69–96Google Scholar
(1978) “Servius and idonei auctores.” American Journal of Philology 99: 181–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1998) “Becoming Cicero,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. and eds. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 248–63Google Scholar
(1976) “Ovid Prooemians,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. 22: 46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J. (2006) “Seneca, Man of Many Genres,” in K. Volk and G. Williams eds.: 19–42
(1993a) “Laszives Vergnügen oder philosophisches Gespräch? Zum Text von Plinius Epist. 5, 3, 2.” Hermes 121: 254–8Google Scholar
(1993b) “Extremos pudeat rediisse – Plinius im Wettstreit mit der Vergangenheit: Zu Vergilzitaten beim jüngeren Plinius.” Antike und Abendland 39: 144–54Google Scholar
(1993c) “Claros colere viros oder über engagierte Bewunderung.” Philologus 137: 62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lana, I. (1991) “Le ‘Lettere a Lucilio’ nella letteratura epistolare,” in Sénèque et la prose latine. ed. Geneva: 253–91Google Scholar
(1990) “The Politics of Self-Presentation: Pliny's Letters and Roman Portrait Sculpture.” Classical Antiquity 9: 14–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. Winsor (2003) “Otium as Luxuria: Economy of Status in the Younger Pliny's Letters,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 147–66CrossRef
(2000) “Sallust's Catiline and Cato the Censor.” Classical Quarterly 50.1: 170–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1918) “Die literarische Form der Briefe Plinius’ des jungeren über den Ausbruch des Vesuvius.” Sokrates 6: 209–34 and 273–97Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1986) “Tacitus’ Conception of Historical Change: The Problem of Discovering the Historian's Opinions,” in Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writings. , and eds. Cambridge: 143–58Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1993) “Reading and Response in the Dialogus,” in Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. and eds. Princeton: 11–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung. Untersuchungen zu den “Paradebriefen” Plinius des Jüngeren. TübingenGoogle Scholar
(2007) “Allusion,” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 12.2: 522–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978) “La villa nelle Epistulae di C. Plinio Cecilio Secondo.” Studi Romagnoli 29: 59–76Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2003) “Pliny and Gloria Dicendi,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 227–34CrossRef
Mazzoli, G. (1991) “La prosa filosofica, scientifica, epistolare,” in La prosa latina. ed. Rome: 145–227Google Scholar
(1987) Ovid, Amores: Text, Prolegomena, and Commentary in Four Volumes. Liverpool-WolfeboroGoogle Scholar
Méthy, N. (2007) Les letters de Pline le Jeune: Une représentation de l'homme. Paris
(2005) “Docta Otia: Garden Ownership and Configurations of Leisure in Statius and Pliny the Younger,” Arethusa 38: 103–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1869) “Zur Lebensgeschichte des jüngeren Plinius.” Hermes 3: 31–136 [= (1906) Gesammelte Schriften 4. Berlin: 366–468]Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2003) “Pliny and the Art of Saying Nothing,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 187–209CrossRef
(1990) Acutum dicendi genus: brevità, oscurità, sottigliezze e paradossi nelle tradizioni retoriche degli stoici. TrentoGoogle Scholar
(1980) “The Date of Tacitus’ Dialogus.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 84: 99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985) “Pliny's Letters and the Dialogus.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89: 171–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968) “Plinius Proximo Tacito: Bemerkungen zu einem Topos der römischen Literaturkritik.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 3.4: 333–57Google Scholar
(1998) “The Survival of Cicero's Letters,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9. Brussels: 63–105Google Scholar
(2003) “Le traitement des figures du père et de la mère dans le livre Ⅵ de la Correspondence de Pline le Jeune: preuves et épreuves.” Vita Latina 168: 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “The Hole in the Hypothesis: Pliny and Martial Reconsidered.” Mnemosyne 52.5: 554–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) The Appropriate Comment: Death Notices in the Ancient Historians. Frankfurt am Main and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Posch, S. (1983) “Eine Eberjagd mit Gänsefusschen (zu Plinius, Ep. Ⅰ,6),” in Festschrift für R. Muth. and eds. Innsbruck: 375–83Google Scholar
Radicke, J. (2003) “Der öffentliche Privatbrief als ‘kommunizierte Kommunikation’ (Plin. Epist. 4, 28),” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 24–33
(1995) “Pliny on Cicero and Oratory: Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye.” The American Journal of Philology 116.1: 123–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2003) “Pliny in Space (and Time),” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 167–86CrossRef
(1910) “Tables of Contents in the MSS of Pliny's Letters.” Classical Philology 5: 476–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966) “Miser Catulle: An Interpretation of the Eighth Poem of Catullus.” Greece and Rome 13: 15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Pliny's Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 265–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narratives. MichiganGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (1992) “Stratagems of Vanity: Cicero ad Familiares 5.12 and Pliny's Letters,” in A. J. Woodman and J. Powell eds. Author and Audience in Latin Literature. Cambridge: 18–32
(2004) “Becoming Tacitus: Significance and Inconsequentiality in the Prologue of Agricola.” Classical Antiquity 23.1: 139–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972) “The Emperor as Insula: Pliny Epist. 6.31.” Classical Philology 67: 47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) “Overlooking Lake Vadimon: Pliny on Tourism (Epist. 8.20).” Classical Philology 77: 139–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Formen von Intertextualität im Briefkorpus des jüngeren Plinius.” Philologus 143.1: 114–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Horace and His Fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6.” The American Journal of Philology 121.1: 93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1952) Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem, Epistularum ad Traianum liber, Panegyricus. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
(1958) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem, Epistularum ad Traianum liber, Panegyricus. Rev. R. Hanslik. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Selden, D. (1992) “Caveat Lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance,” in Innovations of Antiquity, and eds. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
(2006) “Pliny and the Ideology of Empire: The Correspondence with Trajan.” Prometheus 32: 61–76Google Scholar
(1958) “Ovid's Carmen Perpetuum.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 89: 218–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1963) “Naevius and the Roman Annalists.” Rivista di filologia e istruzione classica 91: 440–58Google Scholar
(1968) “People in Pliny.” Journal of Roman Studies 58: 135–51 [= RP 2.694–723]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985b) “The Dating of Pliny's Latest Letters.” Classical Quarterly 35: 176–85 [= RP 5.478–89]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1998) “Parenthetically Speaking (in Virgil and Other Poets),” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, and eds. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 141–57Google Scholar
(1951–2) “Review of J. Carcopino, Cicero: The Secrets of His Correspondence.” The American Historical Review 57: 414–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Virgil's Georgics and the Art of Reference.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 171–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) “Sparrow, Hares, and Doves: A Catullan Metaphor and Its Tradition.” Helios 20.2: 131–42Google Scholar
“Pliny's Want of Humor.” The Classical Journal 37.4: 201–9
(1955) “Pliny's Treatment of History in Epistolary Form.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 86: 213–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972) La personalità di Plinio il Giovane nei suoi rapporti con la politica, la società e la letteratura. Memorie dell'Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Classe delle Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, 4/25. TurinGoogle Scholar
(1970) “Leggendo Plinio il giovane, I (Historia – nomen inertiae).” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 12: 271–348Google Scholar
(1971) “Leggendo Plinio il giovane, Ⅱ (Oratio – historia).” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 13: 70–135Google Scholar
(1974–5) Plinio il Giovane: Documenti critici e testi raccolti da Vincenzo Ussani jr. RomeGoogle Scholar
Vahlen, J. (1928) Enniange Poesis Reliquiae. 2nd edn. Leipzig
(1993) Transition and Reversal in Myth and Ritual. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion 2. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Vielberg, M. (2003) “Sentenzen im Werk des jüngeren Plinius,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 35–50CrossRef
Vogt-Spira, G. (2003) “Die Selbstinszenierung des jüngeren Plinius im Diskurs der literarischen imitatio,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 51–65CrossRef
(1989) “Plinius d. J. und Cicero. Untersuchungen zur römischen Epistolographie in Republik und Kaiserzeit.” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 375–86Google Scholar
(1975) “The Friends of Martial, Statius, and Pliny, and the Dispersal of Patronage.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 79: 265–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1926) “Lesefrüchte 209,”’ Hermes 61: 289–91 [= (1962) Kleine Schriften Ⅳ. Berlin: 416–8. (Euphorion fr. 453)]Google Scholar
Williams, G. (2006) “States of Exile, States of Mind: Paradox and Reversal in Seneca's Consolatio ad Helviam Matrem,” in and eds. 147–73Google Scholar
(1998) “Divided Allusion: Vergil and the Coma Berenices.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 277–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (2001) “Seneca's Epistles Reclassified,” in S. J. Harrison ed.: 164–87
(1985) Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius's The Golden Ass. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1989) “Virgil the Historian,” in J. Diggle, J. B. Hall and H. D. Jocelyn eds.: 132–45
Woodman, A. J. (2003) “Poems to Historians: Catullus 1 and Horace Odes 2.1,” in Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. and eds. Exeter, UK: 191–216Google Scholar
(2006) “Catullus 51: A Suitable case for Treatment.” Classical Quarterly 56: 610–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. (2003) “The City of Letters,” in Rome the Cosmopolis. and eds. Cambridge: 203–21Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2006) “Pliny's Province,” in Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance. ed. AarhusGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2002) “Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace's Satires and the development of Augustan Poetry,” in D. Feeney and A. J. Woodman eds.: 172–86
(1976) “Pliny and Martial.” Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestensis Sect. Class. 4: 63–72Google Scholar
(1971) “Plinius der Jüngere (cos. 100 n. Chr.). Jagdglück eines Schriftstellers,” in Meister römischer Prosa von Cato bis Apuleius. Interpretationen. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Die Inschriften des jüngeren Plinius und seine Mission in Pontus et Bithynia,” in Städte, Eliten und Gesellschaft in der Gallia Cisalpina. Epigraphisch-historische Untersuchungen. Stuttgart: 221–44Google Scholar
(1966) L'Otium dans la vie morale et intellectuelle romaine, des origines à l’époque augustéenne. ParisGoogle Scholar
, and eds. (1996) Les loisirs et l'héritage de la culture classique: actes du ⅩⅢe congrès de l'Association Guillaume Budé, Dijon, 27–31 aoÛt 1993. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
(1881) “Zur Chronologie der Briefe des jüngeren Plinius.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 36: 38–49Google Scholar
(1997) “Warped Intertextualities: Naevius and Sallust at Tacitus Histories 2.12.2.” Histos1Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2003) “Aliud est enim epistulam, aliud historiam … scribere (Epistles 6.16.22): Pliny the Historian?,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 211–26
(1989) “La correspondance de Pline le Jeune: Problèmes et orientations actuelles de la recherche.” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 304–74Google Scholar
Auhagen, U. (2003) “Lusus und Gloria – Plinius’ Hendecasyllabi (Epist. 4, 14; 5, 3 und 7, 4),” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 3–13
(1951) Essai sur les chasses romaines, des origines à la fin du siècle des Antonins. ParisGoogle Scholar
Baier, T. (2003) “KTHMA oder ΑΓωΝIΣΜΑ: Plinius über historischen und rhetorischen Stil,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 69–81
(2001a) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets. Trans. M. Fox and S. Marchesi. LondonGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001b) “The Crossing,” in S. J. Harrison ed.: 142–63
(1970) “La construction du ‘moi’ par la poésie,” in Propositions sur Catulle. Brussels: 131–40Google Scholar
(1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and the Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971) “Virgil's Influence on Tacitus in Book 3 of the Histories.” Classical Philology 66: 93–107Google Scholar
(1972) “Virgil's Influence on Tacitus in Books 1 and 2 of the Annals.” Classical Philology 67: 246–69Google Scholar
Beard, M. (2002) “Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters,” in Classics in Progress. ed. Oxford and New York: 103–44Google Scholar
(1989) “A Note on Revision and Authenticity in Pliny's Letters.” American Journal of Philology 110: 460–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Vergangenheit als Politik: Neue Aspeckte im Werk des jüngeren Plinius. Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
(2000) Onomasticon to the Younger Pliny. Letters and Panegyric. Munich–LeipzigCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1981) “The Gaze of Orpheus,” in The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays. Barrytown, NY.: 99–104Google Scholar
(1991) “Plinio Ep. Ⅶ 9, 11: un'affermazione letteraria in distici elegiaci.” Atene e Roma 36: 26–36Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1994) “Trimalchio's Underworld,” in The Search for the Ancient Novel. ed. Baltimore: 237–59Google Scholar
Bodel, J. (1999) “The Cena Trimalchionis,” in Latin Fiction: The Latin Novel in Context. ed. London and New York: 38–51Google Scholar
Braund, S. Morton. (1998) “Praise and Protreptic in Early Imperial Panegyric: Cicero, Seneca, Pliny,” in The Propaganda of Power. ed. Leiden and Boston: 53–76Google Scholar
(1988) Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
(1976) “Catullus c. 50 als Programm und Bekenntnis.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 119: 162–80Google Scholar
(1970) Die geistige Welt des jüngeren Plinius: Studien zur Thematik seiner Briefe. HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
(1999) [2000] “Latin Literature After A.D. 96: Change or Continuity?.” American Journal of Ancient History 15: 19–39Google Scholar
and (1989) “Imitazione e arte allusiva. Modi e funzioni dell'intertestualità,” in Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, 1. Rome: 81–114Google Scholar
(1972) “Arte allusiva e stilizzazione retorica nelle lettere di Plinio.” Aevum 46: 16–36Google Scholar
Cugusi, P. (2003) “Qualche riflessione sulle idee retoriche di Plinio il Giovane,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 95–122
(1931) “I diminutivi in Plinio Il Giovane.” Atti, Accademia delle Scienze di Torino 66: 93–130Google Scholar
(1990) “Poem Division, Paired Poems, and Amores 2.9 and 3.11.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 269–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Pretis, A. (2004) “‘Epistolarity’ in the First Book of Horace's Epistles.” Piscataway, NJ
, , and eds. (1989) Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
(1999) The Invention of Literature: From Greek Intoxication to the Latin Book. Baltimore and LondonGoogle Scholar
(1997) “Self-Scrutiny and Self-Transformation in Seneca's Letters.” Greece and Rome 44.1: 23–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978a) “Imitation and Evolution: The Discussion of Rhetorical Imitation in Cicero De oratore 2.87–97 and Some Related Problems of Ciceronian Theory.” Classical Philology 73.1: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978b) “Imitation and Decline: Rhetorical Theory and Practice in the First Century after Christ.” Classical Philology 73.2: 102–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. (2002) “Greek Lives and Roman Careers in the Classical uita Tradition,” in European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance. and eds. Toronto: 24–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1991) “Bucolica, lirica, elegia,” in La poesia latina, ed. Florence: 77–131Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2004) “Le Lettere a Lucilio. Introduzione,” in Seneca: Una vicenda testuale. and eds. Florence: 203–9Google Scholar
Feeney, D. (2002) “Una cum scriptore meo: Poetry, Principate and the Tradition of Literary History in the Epistle to Augustus,” in D. Feeney and A. J. Woodman eds.: 172–86
(1990) “Psyche, Aeneas, and an Ass: Apuleius Metamorphoses 6.10–6.21.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120: 333–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) Metamorphosis of Language in Apuleius: A Study of Allusion in the Novel. Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Historia proxima poetis: L'influence de la poésie épique sur le style des historiens latins de Sallust à Ammien Marcellin. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
(1997) “On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies.” Materiali e Discussioni 39: 13–34 [= Roman Constructions, 115–37]Google Scholar
(1968) “On the Unity of Catullus 51.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 96: 153–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002) “Writing to/through Florus: Criticism and the Addressee in Horace Epistles 2.2.” Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 47: 33–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992) Cicero and the Roman Republic. Trans. W. E. Yuill. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
(2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazich, R. (2003) “Retorica dell'esemplarità nelle Lettere di Plinio,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 123–41CrossRef
Gibson, R. (2003) “Pliny and the art of (in)offensive self-praise,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 235–54CrossRef
Gibson, R. (2009) “Elder and Better: The Natural History and the Letters of the Younger Pliny,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds., Pliny The Elder: Themes and Contexts. Brill
and eds. (2003) Re-Imagining Pliny the Younger. Baltimore (=Arethusa 36.2, special issue)Google Scholar
(1979) “Il racconto Pliniano dell'eruzione del Vesuvio dell'a. 79.” La Parola del Passato 188/9: 321–76Google Scholar
Giua, M. A. (2003) “Tacito e i suoi destinatari: storia per i contemporanei, storia per i posteri,” in Evento, racconto, scrittura nell'antichità classica. and , eds. Florence: 247–68Google Scholar
(1999) “Appreciating Aper: The Defence of Modernity in Tacitus’ Dialogus de oratoribus.” Classical Quarterly 49.1: 224–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Görler, W. (1979) “Kaltblütiges Schnarchen: Zum literarischen Hintergrund der Vesuvbriefe des jüngeren Plinius,” in Arktouros: Hellenic Studies presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the occasion of his 65th birthday, , and eds. Berlin and New York: 427–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gramsci, A. (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. and Trans. and . New YorkGoogle Scholar
(1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
(1997) “I diminutivi nell'epistolario di Plinio il Giovane. Una nota stilistica,” in Discentibus obvius. Omaggio degli allievi a Domenico Magnino. Como: 53–71Google Scholar
(1946) “La culture de Pline le Jeune,” in Mélanges dédiés à la mémoire de Felix Grat. Paris: 77–88Google Scholar
(1997) “Catullus, Pliny, and Love-Letters.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 127: 201–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2001a) “Fatal Attraction: Paris, Helen and the Unity of Catullus 51.” Classical Bulletin 77.2: 161–7Google Scholar
ed. (2001b) Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature. OxfordGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Aktuelle Probleme der Dialogus-Rezeption: Echtheitserweise und Lückenumfang.” Philologus 130: 63–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) History and Silence: Purge and Rehabilitation of Memory in Late Antiquity. TorontoGoogle Scholar
(2001) “Pliny on Martial on Pliny on anon and on … (Epistles 3.21 / Epigrams 10.19).” Ramus 30: 56–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) “Knowing Someone Through Their Books: Pliny on Uncle Pliny (Epistles 3.5).” Classical Philology 97.3: 256–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. (2003) “Portrait of the Artist as a Figure of Style: P. L. I.N.Y's LETTERS,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 115–25
Henderson, J. (2006) “Journey of a Lifetime: Seneca, Epistle 57 in Book Ⅵ of EM,” in K. Volk and G. Williams eds.: 123–46
(2005) “Poetic Influence on Prose: The Case of the Younger Seneca.” Proceedings of the British Academy 129: 211–37Google Scholar
(1985) “Ovid's Metamorphoses: Carmen Perpetuum, Carmen Deductum.” Paper of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 223–41Google Scholar
(1985) “In Defence of the Encyclopaedic Mode: on Pliny's Preface to the Natural History.” Latomus 44: 561–76Google Scholar
(2000) “Horace and Catullus: The Case of the Suppressed Precursor in Odes 1.22 and 1.32.” Classical World 94.1: 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1980) “Les Pontiques d'Ovide: la composition des trois premiers livres.” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d'histoire anciennes 54: 19–26Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1971) “Two Aspects of Language and Two Types of Aphasic Disturbances,” in and , Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: 69–96Google Scholar
(1978) “Servius and idonei auctores.” American Journal of Philology 99: 181–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, R. A. (1998) “Becoming Cicero,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen. and eds. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 248–63Google Scholar
(1976) “Ovid Prooemians,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society n.s. 22: 46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ker, J. (2006) “Seneca, Man of Many Genres,” in K. Volk and G. Williams eds.: 19–42
(1993a) “Laszives Vergnügen oder philosophisches Gespräch? Zum Text von Plinius Epist. 5, 3, 2.” Hermes 121: 254–8Google Scholar
(1993b) “Extremos pudeat rediisse – Plinius im Wettstreit mit der Vergangenheit: Zu Vergilzitaten beim jüngeren Plinius.” Antike und Abendland 39: 144–54Google Scholar
(1993c) “Claros colere viros oder über engagierte Bewunderung.” Philologus 137: 62–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lana, I. (1991) “Le ‘Lettere a Lucilio’ nella letteratura epistolare,” in Sénèque et la prose latine. ed. Geneva: 253–91Google Scholar
(1990) “The Politics of Self-Presentation: Pliny's Letters and Roman Portrait Sculpture.” Classical Antiquity 9: 14–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. Winsor (2003) “Otium as Luxuria: Economy of Status in the Younger Pliny's Letters,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 147–66CrossRef
(2000) “Sallust's Catiline and Cato the Censor.” Classical Quarterly 50.1: 170–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1918) “Die literarische Form der Briefe Plinius’ des jungeren über den Ausbruch des Vesuvius.” Sokrates 6: 209–34 and 273–97Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1986) “Tacitus’ Conception of Historical Change: The Problem of Discovering the Historian's Opinions,” in Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writings. , and eds. Cambridge: 143–58Google Scholar
Luce, T. J. (1993) “Reading and Response in the Dialogus,” in Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition. and eds. Princeton: 11–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Epistolographie und Selbstdarstellung. Untersuchungen zu den “Paradebriefen” Plinius des Jüngeren. TübingenGoogle Scholar
(2007) “Allusion,” Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 12.2: 522–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1978) “La villa nelle Epistulae di C. Plinio Cecilio Secondo.” Studi Romagnoli 29: 59–76Google Scholar
Mayer, R. (2003) “Pliny and Gloria Dicendi,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 227–34CrossRef
Mazzoli, G. (1991) “La prosa filosofica, scientifica, epistolare,” in La prosa latina. ed. Rome: 145–227Google Scholar
(1987) Ovid, Amores: Text, Prolegomena, and Commentary in Four Volumes. Liverpool-WolfeboroGoogle Scholar
Méthy, N. (2007) Les letters de Pline le Jeune: Une représentation de l'homme. Paris
(2005) “Docta Otia: Garden Ownership and Configurations of Leisure in Statius and Pliny the Younger,” Arethusa 38: 103–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1869) “Zur Lebensgeschichte des jüngeren Plinius.” Hermes 3: 31–136 [= (1906) Gesammelte Schriften 4. Berlin: 366–468]Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2003) “Pliny and the Art of Saying Nothing,” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 187–209CrossRef
(1990) Acutum dicendi genus: brevità, oscurità, sottigliezze e paradossi nelle tradizioni retoriche degli stoici. TrentoGoogle Scholar
(1980) “The Date of Tacitus’ Dialogus.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 84: 99–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985) “Pliny's Letters and the Dialogus.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 89: 171–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1968) “Plinius Proximo Tacito: Bemerkungen zu einem Topos der römischen Literaturkritik.” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 3.4: 333–57Google Scholar
(1998) “The Survival of Cicero's Letters,” in Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 9. Brussels: 63–105Google Scholar
(2003) “Le traitement des figures du père et de la mère dans le livre Ⅵ de la Correspondence de Pline le Jeune: preuves et épreuves.” Vita Latina 168: 82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “The Hole in the Hypothesis: Pliny and Martial Reconsidered.” Mnemosyne 52.5: 554–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1991) The Appropriate Comment: Death Notices in the Ancient Historians. Frankfurt am Main and New YorkGoogle Scholar
Posch, S. (1983) “Eine Eberjagd mit Gänsefusschen (zu Plinius, Ep. Ⅰ,6),” in Festschrift für R. Muth. and eds. Innsbruck: 375–83Google Scholar
Radicke, J. (2003) “Der öffentliche Privatbrief als ‘kommunizierte Kommunikation’ (Plin. Epist. 4, 28),” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 24–33
(1995) “Pliny on Cicero and Oratory: Self-Fashioning in the Public Eye.” The American Journal of Philology 116.1: 123–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggsby, A. M. (2003) “Pliny in Space (and Time),” in R. Gibson and R. Morello eds.: 167–86CrossRef
(1910) “Tables of Contents in the MSS of Pliny's Letters.” Classical Philology 5: 476–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1966) “Miser Catulle: An Interpretation of the Eighth Poem of Catullus.” Greece and Rome 13: 15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Pliny's Catullus: The Politics of Literary Appropriation.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 128: 265–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narratives. MichiganGoogle Scholar
Rudd, N. (1992) “Stratagems of Vanity: Cicero ad Familiares 5.12 and Pliny's Letters,” in A. J. Woodman and J. Powell eds. Author and Audience in Latin Literature. Cambridge: 18–32
(2004) “Becoming Tacitus: Significance and Inconsequentiality in the Prologue of Agricola.” Classical Antiquity 23.1: 139–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972) “The Emperor as Insula: Pliny Epist. 6.31.” Classical Philology 67: 47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) “Overlooking Lake Vadimon: Pliny on Tourism (Epist. 8.20).” Classical Philology 77: 139–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Formen von Intertextualität im Briefkorpus des jüngeren Plinius.” Philologus 143.1: 114–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2000) “Horace and His Fathers: Satires 1.4 and 1.6.” The American Journal of Philology 121.1: 93–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1952) Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem, Epistularum ad Traianum liber, Panegyricus. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
(1958) C. Plini Caecili Secundi Epistularum libri novem, Epistularum ad Traianum liber, Panegyricus. Rev. R. Hanslik. LeipzigGoogle Scholar
Selden, D. (1992) “Caveat Lector: Catullus and the Rhetoric of Performance,” in Innovations of Antiquity, and eds. New York and LondonGoogle Scholar
(2006) “Pliny and the Ideology of Empire: The Correspondence with Trajan.” Prometheus 32: 61–76Google Scholar
(1958) “Ovid's Carmen Perpetuum.” Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 89: 218–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1963) “Naevius and the Roman Annalists.” Rivista di filologia e istruzione classica 91: 440–58Google Scholar
(1968) “People in Pliny.” Journal of Roman Studies 58: 135–51 [= RP 2.694–723]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1985b) “The Dating of Pliny's Latest Letters.” Classical Quarterly 35: 176–85 [= RP 5.478–89]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1998) “Parenthetically Speaking (in Virgil and Other Poets),” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, and eds. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 141–57Google Scholar
(1951–2) “Review of J. Carcopino, Cicero: The Secrets of His Correspondence.” The American Historical Review 57: 414–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1986) “Virgil's Georgics and the Art of Reference.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 171–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993) “Sparrow, Hares, and Doves: A Catullan Metaphor and Its Tradition.” Helios 20.2: 131–42Google Scholar
“Pliny's Want of Humor.” The Classical Journal 37.4: 201–9
(1955) “Pliny's Treatment of History in Epistolary Form.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 86: 213–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1972) La personalità di Plinio il Giovane nei suoi rapporti con la politica, la società e la letteratura. Memorie dell'Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Classe delle Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche, 4/25. TurinGoogle Scholar
(1970) “Leggendo Plinio il giovane, I (Historia – nomen inertiae).” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 12: 271–348Google Scholar
(1971) “Leggendo Plinio il giovane, Ⅱ (Oratio – historia).” Rivista di cultura classica e medioevale 13: 70–135Google Scholar
(1974–5) Plinio il Giovane: Documenti critici e testi raccolti da Vincenzo Ussani jr. RomeGoogle Scholar
Vahlen, J. (1928) Enniange Poesis Reliquiae. 2nd edn. Leipzig
(1993) Transition and Reversal in Myth and Ritual. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion 2. LeidenGoogle Scholar
Vielberg, M. (2003) “Sentenzen im Werk des jüngeren Plinius,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 35–50CrossRef
Vogt-Spira, G. (2003) “Die Selbstinszenierung des jüngeren Plinius im Diskurs der literarischen imitatio,” in L. Castagna and E. Lefèvre eds.: 51–65CrossRef
(1989) “Plinius d. J. und Cicero. Untersuchungen zur römischen Epistolographie in Republik und Kaiserzeit.” in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.33.1: 375–86Google Scholar
(1975) “The Friends of Martial, Statius, and Pliny, and the Dispersal of Patronage.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 79: 265–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1926) “Lesefrüchte 209,”’ Hermes 61: 289–91 [= (1962) Kleine Schriften Ⅳ. Berlin: 416–8. (Euphorion fr. 453)]Google Scholar
Williams, G. (2006) “States of Exile, States of Mind: Paradox and Reversal in Seneca's Consolatio ad Helviam Matrem,” in and eds. 147–73Google Scholar
(1998) “Divided Allusion: Vergil and the Coma Berenices.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 98: 277–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. (2001) “Seneca's Epistles Reclassified,” in S. J. Harrison ed.: 164–87
(1985) Auctor & Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius's The Golden Ass. BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1989) “Virgil the Historian,” in J. Diggle, J. B. Hall and H. D. Jocelyn eds.: 132–45
Woodman, A. J. (2003) “Poems to Historians: Catullus 1 and Horace Odes 2.1,” in Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. and eds. Exeter, UK: 191–216Google Scholar
(2006) “Catullus 51: A Suitable case for Treatment.” Classical Quarterly 56: 610–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, G. (2003) “The City of Letters,” in Rome the Cosmopolis. and eds. Cambridge: 203–21Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (2006) “Pliny's Province,” in Rome and the Black Sea Region: Domination, Romanisation, Resistance. ed. AarhusGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2002) “Dreaming about Quirinus: Horace's Satires and the development of Augustan Poetry,” in D. Feeney and A. J. Woodman eds.: 172–86