Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7c2ld Total loading time: 0.453 Render date: 2021-11-27T02:44:15.298Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Reference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Paul R. Kroeger
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dallas
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Analyzing Grammar
An Introduction
, pp. 352 - 359
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaltio, M. H. 1964. Finnish for foreigners. Helsinki: Kustannusosakeyhtiö Otava. (5th edn., 1971)Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2000. Classifiers: a typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford and New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Aissen, J. L. 1974. Verb raising. Linguistic Inquiry 5:325affix boundary366Google Scholar
Aissen, J. L. and D. M. Perlmutter. 1983. Clause Reduction in Spanish. In Perlmutter (ed.), pp. 360–403
Allen, B. and D. Frantz. 1983. Advancements and verb agreement in Southern Tiwa. In Perlmutter (ed.), pp. 303–314
Allen, B., Gardiner, D., and Frantz, D., 1984. Noun incorporation in Southern Tiwa. International Journal of American Linguistics 50:292affix boundary311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. H. and J. B. Greenough. 1931. New Latin grammar. Aristide D. Caratzas, New Rochelle, NY (1992)
Anderson, S. 1982. Where's morphology? Linguistic Inquiry 13:571affix boundary612Google Scholar
Aronoff, M. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Asher, R. E. 1985. Tamil. London, Sydney and Dover: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Ashton, E. O. 1944. Swahili grammar (including intonation). (2nd edn. 1947). London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Asmah Hj. O. and R. Subbiah. 1985 (1968). An introduction to Malay grammar. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur
Aspillera, P. S. 1969. Basic Tagalog for foreigners and non-Tagalogs. Rutland, VT: Charles E. TuttleGoogle Scholar
Baker, C. L. 1978. Introduction to Transformational-Generative syntax. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: a theory of grammatical function changing. University of Chicago Press
Barrett-Keach, C. 1985. The syntax and interpretation of the relative clause construction in Swahili. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Beller, R. and P. Beller. 1979. Huasteca Nahuatl. In Ronald Langacker (ed.), Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar, Vol. 2: Modern Aztec grammatical sketches. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington, pp. 199–306
Bendor-Samuel, J. T. 1960. Some problems of segmentation in the phonological analysis of Tereno. Word 16:348affix boundary355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendor-Samuel, J. and S. H. Levinsohn. 1986. Exercises for use in conjunction with the text Introduction to Grammatical Analysis. 3rd edn. Mimeo, SIL British School, Horsleys Green, Bucks
Besnier, N. 1987. An autosegmental approach to metathesis in Rotuman. Lingua 73:205–233
Bickford, J. A. 1998. Tools for analyzing the world's languages: morphology and syntax. Dallas: Summer Institute of LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
Blake, B. 1987. Australian aboriginal grammar. London and Sydney: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
Bloomfield, L. 1917. Tagalog texts with grammatical analysis. University of Illinois Studies in Language and Literature, Vol. 3
Booij, G. 1986. Form and meaning in morphology: the case of Dutch ‘agent nouns’. Linguistics 24:503affix boundary517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouquiaux, L. 1970. La langue birom (Nigéria septentrional): phonologie, morphologie, syntaxe. Bibliothèque de la Faculté de philosophie et lettres de l'Université de Liège; fasc. 185. Paris: Les Belles Lettres
Bresnan, J. (ed.). 1982. The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. 1997. Mixed categories as head sharing constructions. Proceedings of the LFG97 Conference, University of California, San Diego, ed. by M. Butt and T. Holloway King. On-line, Stanford University: http://www-csli.stanford.edu/publications/LFG2/lfg97.html
Bresnan, J. 2001. Lexical-Functional syntax. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. and Grimshaw, J.. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9:331affix boundary391Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. and Mchombo, S. A.. 1987. Topic, pronoun and agreement in Chichewa. Language 63/4:741affix boundary782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. 1985. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cárdenas, D. 1961. Applied linguistics: Spanish: a guide for teachers. Boston: D. C. Heath & CoGoogle Scholar
Chelliah, S. L. 1992. Pretty derivational morphemes all in a row. Berkeley Linguistics Society 18, Parasession on the place of morphology in a grammar, pp. 287affix boundary297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: MoutonGoogle Scholar
Chung, S. and A. Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In Shopen (ed.), Vol. 3, pp. 202–258
Clark, E. V. 1970. Locationals: a study of the relations between ‘existential’, ‘locative’, and ‘possessive’ constructions. In Working Papers on Language Universals 3, Stanford University, pp. 1–36
Clark, E. V. 1978. Locationals: existential, locative and possessive constructions. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 4: syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 85–126
Clayre, B. and Cubit, L.. 1974. An outline of Kayan grammar. Sarawak Museum Journal 43:43affix boundary91Google Scholar
Cohn, A. C. 1989. Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7/2nd person:167affix boundary216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, P. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Lingua Descriptive Studies, 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland
Comrie, B. 1976a. Aspect. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. 1976b. The syntax of causative constructions: cross-language similarities and divergences. In Shibatani (ed.), The grammar of causative constructions. Syntax and semantics, Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, pp. 261–312
Comrie, B. 1978. Ergativity. In W. Lehmann (ed.),Syntactic typology: studies in the phenomenology of language. Austin: University of Texas Press, pp. 329–394
Comrie, B. 1981a. Language universals and linguistic typology. University of Chicago Press
Comrie, B. 1981b. Ergativity and grammatical relations in Kalaw Lagaw Ya (Saibai dialect). Australian Journal of Linguistics 1st person/1st person:1st personaffix boundary42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. 1985. Tense. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coope, A. E. 1976. Malay–English English–Malay dictionary. Kuala Lumpur: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. 1977. The structure of Jacaltec. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. 1986a. Jacaltec noun classifiers. Lingua 70:241affix boundary284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, C. (ed.). 1986b. Noun classes and categorization: proceedings of a symposium on categorization and noun classification, Eugene, Oregon, October 1983. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culy, C. 1990. Grammatical relations and verb forms in internally headed relative clauses. In Dziwirek, Farrell and Bikandi (eds.), Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications
Curme, G. O. 1952 (1922). A grammar of the German language. New York: F. UngarGoogle Scholar
Day, C. 1973. The Jacaltec language. Language Science Monographs 12. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
De Guzman, V. P. 1978. Syntactic derivation of Tagalog verbs. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 16. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of north Queensland. London and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A grammar of Yidiɳ. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Language 55. 1st person:59affix boundary138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1986. Noun classes and noun classification in typological perspective. In C. Craig (ed.), pp. 105–112
Donaldson, T. 1980. Ngiyambaa, the language of the Wangaaybuwan. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Doron, E. 1986. The pronominal ‘copula’ as an agreement clitic. In H. Borer (ed.), The syntax of pronominal clitics. Syntax and semantics 19. New York: Academic Press, pp. 313–332
Downing, P. 1986. The anaphoric use of classifiers in Japanese. In C. Craig (ed.), pp. 345–375
Dowty, D. R. 1979. Word meaning and Montague grammar: the semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht and Boston: ReidelCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, T. 1973. Conversational New Guinea pidgin. Pacific Linguistics, D12. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University
Ellison, F., Gomes de Matos, F., et al. 1971. Modern Portuguese: a project of the Modern Language Association. New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar
Elson, B. and V. Pickett. 1988. Beginning morphology and syntax. 2nd edn. Dallas: SIL
Emonds, J. E. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: root, structure-preserving, and local transformations. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
English, L. J. 1986. Tagalog–English Dictionary. Manila: National Book StoreGoogle Scholar
Ezard, B. 1992. Tawala derivational prefixes: a semantic perspective. In M. D. Ross (ed.), Papers in Austronesian Linguistics, 2. Pacific Linguistics A 82. Canberra: Australian National University, pp. 147–250
Foley, W. A. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Foley, W. A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PressGoogle Scholar
Gerdts, D. 1998. Incorporation. In Spencer and Zwicky (eds.), pp. 84–100
Givón, T. 1972. Studies in ChiBemba and Bantu grammar. Studies in African Linguistics, Supplement 3rd person:1st personaffix boundary247Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Li (ed.), pp. 149–188
Givón, T. 1984. Syntax: a typological functional introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Glover, W. 1974. Semantic and grammatical structures in Gurung (Nepal). Norman, OK: SILGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language. (2nd edn. 1966) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 73–113
Gronemeyer, C. 1996. Noun incorporation in Hopi. Working Papers 45:25–44. Lund University, Department of Linguistics
Haiman, J. 1992. Iconicity. In Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–195
Hale, K. 1965. Some preliminary observations on Papago morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 31/4:295affix boundary305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. 1981. On the position of Walbiri in a typology of the base. Indiana University Linguistics Club
Halpern, A. 1998. Clitics. In Spencer and Zwicky (eds.), pp. 101–122
Haspelmath, M. 1996. Word-class-changing inflection and morpological theory. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 43–66
Haspelmath, M. 2002. Understanding morphology. London: Arnold; and New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Healey, J. 1990a. Doing grammar. Kangaroo Ground, Vic.: SPSIL
Healey, J. 1990b. Grammar exercises. Kangaroo Ground, Vic.: SPSIL
Hinnebusch, T. 1992. Swahili. In Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, Vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–106
Hockett, C. F. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Word 10:210affix boundary231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, C. F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. 1984. Introduction to the grammar of English. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, J. 1978. The core of Walmatjari grammar. Canberra: Australian Institute for Aboriginal Studies
Hutchisson, D. 1986. Sursurunga pronouns and the special uses of quadral number. In Wiesemann (ed.), pp. 1–20
Hyman, L. and Mchombo, S.. 1992. Morphotactic constraints in the Chichewa verb stem. Berkeley Linguistics Society 18, Parasession on the place of morphology in a grammar, pp. 350affix boundary364Google Scholar
Ingram, D. 1978. Typology and universals of personal pronouns. In Greenberg et al. (eds.), Universals of human language, Vol. 3: Word structure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 213–247
Jackendoff, R. S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1924. The philosophy of grammar. London: Allen & Unwin; New York: H. Holt & CoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. and J. Bresnan. 1982. Lexical–Functional Grammar: a formal system for grammatical representation. In Bresnan (ed.), pp. 173–281
Keenan, E. L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Shopen (ed.), Vol. 2, pp. 141–170
King, T. H. 1995. Configuring topic and focus in Russian. Stanford, CA: CSLIGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, R. 1985a. Clauses in Kalaw Lagaw Ya. In S. Ray (ed.), Aboriginal and islander grammars: collected papers. Work papers of SIL-AAB, Series A, Vol. 9. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, pp. 59–79
Kennedy, R. 1985b. Kalaw Kawaw verbs. In S. Ray (ed.), Aboriginal and islander grammars: collected papers. Work papers of SIL-AAB, Series A, Vol. 9. Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, pp. 81–103
Kenstowicz, M. and Kisseberth, C.. 1979. Generative phonology: description and theory. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Kimenyi, A. 1980. A relational grammar of Kinyarwanda. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, C. and M. Abasheikh. 1977. The object relationship in Chi-Mwi:ni, a Bantu language. In Cole and Sadock (eds.), Grammatical relations. Syntax and semantics, 8. New York: Academic Press, pp. 179–218
Klima, E. S. 1964. Negation in English. In J. Fodor and J. Katz (eds.), The structure of language. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, pp. 246–323
Kroeger, P. R. 1993. Phrase Structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford, CA: CSLIGoogle Scholar
Kroeger, P. R. 1998. Clitics and clause structure in Tagalog. In Lourdes Bautista (ed.), Pagtanaw: essays on language in honor of Teodoro A. Llamzon. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines, pp. 53–72
Kroeger, P. R. 2004. Analyzing syntax: a lexical-functional approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. 1972. Fundamentals of linguistic analysis. New York: Harcourt Brace JovanovichGoogle Scholar
Larsen, T. W. 1987. The syntactic status of ergativity in Quiché. Lingua 71/1st person:33affix boundary59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. N. 1996. A grammar of Iranian Azerbaijani. (1) preposition; (2) transitive patienth.D. thesis, University of Sussex
Lehmann, C. 1988. On the function of agreement. In M. Barlow and C. A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language: approaches, theories, descriptions. Stanford, CA: CSLI, pp. 55–65
Li, C. N. (ed.). 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Li, C. N. and Thompson, S.. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
Lyons, J. 1966. Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech.’Journal of Linguistics 2nd person:209affix boundary236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maling, J. 1983. Transitive adjectives: a case of categorial reanalysis. In Heny and Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles, Vol. 1. Boston: Reidel, pp. 253–289
Matsumoto, Y. 1993. Japanese numeral classifiers: a study of semantic categories and lexical organization. Linguistics 31:667affix boundary713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. H. 1991. Morphology (2nd edn.). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1988. The syntactic phenomena of English. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Mchombo, S. A. 1993. On the binding of the reflexive and reciprocal in Chichewa. In Mchombo (ed.), Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar. Standford, CA: CSLI Publications, pp. 181–207
Mchombo, S. A. 1998. Chichewa (Bantu). In Spencer and Zwicky (eds.), pp. 500–520
Merlan, F. 1976. Noun incorporation and discourse reference in modern Nahuatl. International Journal of American Linguistics 42:177–191
Merrifield, W., C. Naish, C. Rensch, and G. Story (eds.). 1987. Laboratory manual for morphology and syntax. 6th edn. Dallas: SIL. (7th edn. 2003)
Mithun, M. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60:847affix boundary894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K. P. 1982. Grammatical relations and clause structure in Malayalam. In Bresnan (ed.), pp. 427–503
Mohanan, K. P. 1983. Move Noun Phrase or lexical rules? Evidence from Malayalam causativization. In L. Levin, M. Rappaport, and A. Zaenen (eds.), Papers in Lexical-Functional grammar. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club, pp. 47–111
Mosel, L. U. and A. So'o, 1997. Say it in Samoan. Pacific Linguistics D88. Canberra: Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University
Muysken, P. 1981. Quechua word structure. In Heny (ed.), Binding and filtering. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 279–327
Muysken, P. 1988. Affix order and interpretation: Quechua. In M. Everaaert, A. Evers, R. Huybregts, and M.Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and modularity. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 259–279
Nevis, J. 1988 (1985). Finnish particle clitics and general clitic theory. Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
Nichols, J. 1986. Head-marking and dependent-marking. Language 62:56affix boundary117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nik, Safiah K., Onn, Farid, Musa, Hashim Hj., and Mahmood, A. Hamid. 1986. Tatabahasa Dewan, Jilid 1: Ayat. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan PustakaGoogle Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, S. 1992. Portuguese. In Bright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 3. Oxford University Press, pp. 252–256
Payne, J. R. 1985. Negation. In Shopen (ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 197–242
Payne, T. 1997. Describing morphosyntax: a guide for field linguists. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Payne, T. 2002. Analytical methods in morphology and syntax. Unpublished MS., ORSIL, Eugene OR
Perlmutter, D. (ed.). 1983. Studies in Relational Grammar I. University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. 1947. Phonemics: a technique for reducing languages to writing. University of Michigan Publications: Linguistics, 3. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Pike, K. L. and E. G. Pike. 1982. Grammatical analysis. (2nd edn.). Dallas: SIL and The University of Texas at Arlington
Postal, P. 1962. Some syntactic rules of Mohawk. (1) preposition; (2) transitive patienth.D. dissertation, Yale University. (1979, New York: Garland Press)
Radford, A. 1988. Transformational Grammar: a first course. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos, T. V. 1971. Tagalog structures. PALI Language Texts: Philippines. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
Reed, J. and D. Payne. 1986. Asheninca (Campa) pronominals. In Wiesemann (ed.), pp. 323–331
Reesink, G. P. 1999. A grammar of Hatam: Bird's Head Peninsula, Irian Jaya. Pacific Linguistics C-146. Canberra: Australian National University
Rizzi, L. 1978. A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In Keyser (ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph, 3. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 113–158
Roberts, J. R. 1988. Amele switch reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19:45affix boundary63Google Scholar
Roberts, J. R. 1996. A Government and Binding analysis of the verb in Amele. Language and Linguistics in Melanesia 27:1st personaffix boundary66Google Scholar
Roberts, J. R. 1999. Grammar exercises for Tools for analyzing the world's languages (Bickford 1998). Mimeo, SIL UK Training and Research Dept., Horsleys Green, Bucks
Robins, R. H. 1964. General linguistics: an introductory survey. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; and London: Longmans
Rosen, C. 1990. Rethinking Southern Tiwa: the geometry of a triple-agreement language. Language 66:669affix boundary713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S. T. 1989. Two types of noun incorporation: a lexical analysis. Language 65:294affix boundary317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saad, G. N. and Bolozky, S.. 1984. Causativization and transitivization in Arabic and Modern Hebrew. Afroasiatic Linguistics 9:101affix boundary110Google Scholar
Sadock, J. and A. Zwicky. 1985. Speech act distinctions in syntax. In Shopen (ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 159–196
Sá Pereira, M. de Lourdes. 1948. Brazilian Portuguese grammar. Boston: D. C. Heath and Co
Schachter, P. 1977. Reference-related and role-related properties of subjects. In P. Cole and J. Sadock (eds.), Grammatical Relations, Syntax and Semantics 8. New York: Academic Press, pp. 279–306
Schachter, P. 1985. Parts-of-speech systems. In Shopen (ed.), Vol. 1, pp. 3–61
Schachter, P. and Otanes, F. T.. 1972. Tagalog Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. J. 1972. Schaum's outline of Spanish grammar. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Shopen, T. (ed.). Language typology and syntactic description, Vols. 1–3. Cambridge, New York, and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press
Silverstein, M. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R. M. W. Dixon (ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, pp. 112–171
Sityar, E. M. 1989. Pronominal clitics in Tagalog. M.A. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles
Sneddon, J. 1996. Indonesian reference grammar. London and New York: Routledge; and St. Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin
Spatar, N. M. 1997. Imperative constructions in Cambodian. Mon-Khmer Studies 27:119affix boundary127Google Scholar
Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological theory: an introduction to word structure in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Spencer, A. and Zwicky, A. (eds.). 1998. The handbook of morphology. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Stern, G. and Bleiler, E.. 1961. Essential German grammar. New York: Dover; and London: Hodder & StoughtonGoogle Scholar
Stump, G. 1998. Inflection. In Spencer and Zwicky (eds.), pp. 13–43
Sussex, R. 1992. Russian. In Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, Vol. 3. Oxford University Press, pp. 350–358
Thomas, E., J. T. Bendor-Samuel, and S. H. Levinsohn. 1988. Introduction to grammatical analysis: self-instruction and correspondence course second (revised) edition. Horsleys Green, Bucks: SIL
Trechsel, F. R. 1993. Quiché focus constructions. Lingua 91/1st person:33affix boundary78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, N. 1996. An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Cambridge, MA; and Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
Underhill, R. 1976. Turkish grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. 1989. A grammar of the Muna language. Dordrecht: ForisGoogle Scholar
Verhaar, J. 1995. Toward a reference grammar of Tok Pisin: an experiment in corpus linguistics. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication, 26. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press
Vitale, A. J. 1981. Swahili syntax. Publications in Language Sciences, 5. Dordrecht and Cinnaminson, N.J.: Foris Publications
Walton, C. 1986. Sama verbal semantics: classification, derivation and inflection. Linguistic Society of the Philippines, Special Monograph Issue, 25. Manila: Linguistic Society of the Philippines
Weber, D. J. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huanuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1981. Case marking and human nature. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1st person/1st person:43affix boundary80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesemann, U. (ed.). 1986. Pronominal systems. Tübingen: Narr
Wolfenden, E. P. 1961. A restatement of Tagalog grammar. Manila: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the Institute of National Language
Wolfenden, E. P. 1967. Tagalog concordance. Unpublished MS., University of Oklahoma Computer Laboratory
Wollams, G. 1996. A grammar of Karo Batak, Sumatra. Pacific Linguistics C-130. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University
Woodbury, H. 1975. Noun incorporation in Onandaga. (1) preposition; (2) transitive patienth. D. dissertation, Yale University
Woolford, E. B. 1979. Aspects of Tok Pisin grammar. Pacific linguistics B66. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University
Zwicky, A. 1977. On clitics. Bloomington, IN: IULCGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. 1985. Clitics and particles. Language 61/2nd person:283affix boundary305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, A. and Pullum, G.. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n't. Language 59/3rd person:502affix boundary513CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Reference
  • Paul R. Kroeger, Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dallas
  • Book: Analyzing Grammar
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801679.021
Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

  • Reference
  • Paul R. Kroeger, Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dallas
  • Book: Analyzing Grammar
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801679.021
Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

  • Reference
  • Paul R. Kroeger, Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics, Dallas
  • Book: Analyzing Grammar
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801679.021
Available formats
×