Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Summary Contents
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I European Law: Creation
- Part II European Law: Enforcement
- Part III European Law: Substance
- Appendices
- Appendix I Academic Literature: Further Reading
- Appendix II How to Find (and Read) EU Judgments
- Index
Appendix II - How to Find (and Read) EU Judgments
from Appendices
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Summary Contents
- Contents
- List of illustrations
- List of tables
- Acknowledgements
- Table of cases
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I European Law: Creation
- Part II European Law: Enforcement
- Part III European Law: Substance
- Appendices
- Appendix I Academic Literature: Further Reading
- Appendix II How to Find (and Read) EU Judgments
- Index
Summary
All EU cases are traditionally identified by a number/year figure that is followed by the names of the parties. Cases before the Court of Justice are preceded by a C-, while cases decided before the General Court are preceded by a T- (for the French ‘Tribunal’). The Civil Service Tribunal prefixes its cases with an F- (for the French ‘Fonction publique’).
In the past, all judgments of all EU Courts were published in paper form in the purple-bound ‘European Court Reports’ (ECR). Cases decided by the Court of Justice were published in the ECR-I series; cases decided by the General Court were published in the ECR-II series, while cases decided by the Civil Service Tribunal were published in the ECR-SC series. However, as of 2012, the entire Court of Justice of the European Union has decided to go “paperless” and now publishes its judgments only electronically. The two principal websites here are the Court's own curia-website (http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/j_6/), and the Union's general EU lexwebsite (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html). For judgments referred to in the main text of this book, the easiest way is however to go to www.schutze.eu, which contains the ‘Lisbon’ version of all classic EU Court judgments mentioned in this text.
Once upon a time, judgments issued by the European Court of Justice were – to paraphrase Hobbes – “nasty, brutish and short”. Their shortness was partly due to a structural division the Court made between the “Issues of Fact and of Law” (or later: “Report for the Hearing”) – which set out the facts, procedure and the arguments of the parties – and the “Grounds of Judgment”. Only the latter constituted the judgment sensu stricto and was often very short indeed. The Court originally also tried to adopt the “French” judicial ideal of trying to put the entire judgment into a single “sentence”! A judgment like Van Gend en Loos contains about 2,000 words – not more than an undergraduate essay.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- An Introduction to European Law , pp. 330 - 334Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015