Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T05:23:33.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

James A. Thurber
Affiliation:
University of Oregon
Antoine Yoshinaka
Affiliation:
University of New York at Buffalo
James A. Thurber
Affiliation:
American University, Washington DC
Antoine Yoshinaka
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Get access

Summary

Partisan polarization among the public, activists, and elected officials characterizes American politics in the twenty-first century, and it is often seen as the major source of our governing problems (Schaffner 2011, Persily 2015). Republicans and Democrats are further apart ideologically than at any point in recent history, expressing highly negative views of the opposing party (Doherty 2014). The deleterious impact of partisan polarization cannot be exaggerated. It discourages compromise, produces gridlock, fosters mistrust, and ultimately hinders the functioning of governmental institutions. Lawmaking, representing, overseeing, executing laws, and adjudicating legal and constitutional disputes requires that individuals who might otherwise disagree come together and serve interests that go beyond their own. Failure to compromise results in gridlock, dysfunction, and partisan warfare. To paraphrase former House Speaker Sam Rayburn, we are not going along, let alone getting along!

It was not always thus. In fact, during much of the twentieth century, our national parties did not exhibit this sort of intense partisan polarization that we have seen emerge over the last generation or so. To understand how we got to where we are today, we must account for the rapid partisan change that the U.S. South has witnessed over the latter half of the twentieth century. Long gone are the days of the conservative southern Democrats (Dixiecrats) holding a more liberal northern caucus in check. Largely as a response to federal intervention in the civil rights arena, conservative southern Democratic voters started to migrate toward the GOP in the mid-1960s. Todaye's southern conservatives are well ensconced within the Republican Party. Southern Democrats in 2014 are largely liberal and nonwhite. The South has realigned politically. A similar, if not somewhat less acute, change occurred in reverse in other parts of the country such as the northeastern and the far west of the United States. With large swaths of the country realigning into one or the other party, each partye's coalition has become much more homogeneous ideologically and in terms of policy preferences. To be liberal in 2014 is to be a Democrat; the same goes for conservatives and Republicans. Battles over the scope and size of the federal government have produced a wide policy schism between parties.

WHY WRITE THIS BOOK?

Although it is true that the literature on gridlock and polarization is extensive, it is also the case that it is quite disparate.

Type
Chapter
Information
American Gridlock
The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization
, pp. 1 - 16
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2012. The Polarized Public: Why American Government Is So Dysfunctional. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2011. The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Balz, Dan. 2014. “Dysfunction Is Washington's New Normal,” Washington Post. December 14, A2.
Baker, Ross K. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead? A Report from the Senate. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon, and Fleisher, Richard, eds. 2000. Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Doherty, Carroll. 2014. “7 Things to Know about Polarization in America.” Pew Research Center, June 12. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/06/12/7-things-to-know-about-polarization-in-america/.
Fiorina, Morris P. 2014. “Americans Have Not Become Politically More Polarized.” Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/06/23/americans-have-not-become-more-politically-polarized/.
Fiorina, Morris P. 2011. Disconnect: The Breakdown of Representation in American Politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy. 2006. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America, edition. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Frisch, Scott A., and Kelly, Sean Q., eds. 2013. Politics to the Extreme: American Political Institutions in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Pierson, Paul. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc. 2005. Why Trust Matters: Declining Political Trust and the Demise of American Liberalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc, and Weiler, Jonathan. 2009. Authoritarianism and Polarization in American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 2013. “Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (December): 688–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C., Carsey, Thomas M., and Horowitz, Juliana Menasce. 2006. “Party Polarization in American Politics: Characteristics, Causes and Consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9 (June): 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2010. “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew S. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. 2004. “Remarks at the ‘Polarization of American Politics: Myth or Reality?’ Conference,” Princeton University, December 3.
Mann, Thomas E. and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2014. “The Party of Now What?” Washington Post, November 9, B1 and B4.
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2013. It's Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2006. The Broken Branch: How Congress is Failing American and How to Get It Back on Track. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Masket, Seth, 2011. No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Muirhead, Russell. 2014. The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nivola, Pietro, and Brady, David S., eds. 2006. Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America's Polarized Politics: Volume One. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Nivola, Pietro S., and Brady, David S., eds. 2008. Red and Blue Nation? Volume Two: Consequences and Correction of America's Polarized Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Oleszek, Walter J. 2014. “The Evolving Congress: Overview and Analysis of the Modern Era.” In The Evolving Congress, prepared by Congressional Research Service, December. Library of Congress for the Committee on Rules and Administration, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC:U.S. Printing Office, 3–60.Google Scholar
Noel, Hans. 2013. Political Ideologies and Political Parties in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persily, Nathaniel (eds.). 2015. Solutions to Political Polarization in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith T. 2013. Political Bubbles: Financial Crises and the Failure of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2000. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2011. “Party Polarization,” In Schickler, Erick and Lee, Francis E., eds., The Oxford Handbook of American Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Barbara. 1995. Legislators, Leaders, and Lawmaking. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean. 2013. The Gingrich Senators: The Roots of Partisan Warfare in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurber, James A. 2014. “The Dynamics and Dysfunction of the Congressional Budget Process: From Inception to Deadlock,” In Dodd, Lawrence C. and Oppenheimer, Bruce I., eds., Congress Reconsidered. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 319–345.Google Scholar
Thurber, James A. 2013. “An Introduction to Presidential-Congressional Rivalry.” In Thurber, James A., ed., Rivals for Power: Presidential-Congressional Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1–26.Google Scholar
Thurber, James A. 2012. “Agony, Angst, and the Failure of the Supercommittee,” Extensions Summer: 1–10.
Thurber, James A. 2011. “An Introduction to an Assessment of the Obama Presidency.” In Thurber, James A., ed., Obama in Office. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 1–20.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×