Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:28:56.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Phylogenetic analysis of alternative reproductive tactics: problems and possibilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Vítor C. Almada
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Portugal
Joana I. Robalo
Affiliation:
Unidade de Investigação em Eco-Etologia Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Portugal
Rui F. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Instituto Superior Psicologia Aplicada, Lisbon
Michael Taborsky
Affiliation:
Universität Bern, Switzerland
H. Jane Brockmann
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

CHAPTER SUMMARY

We present an outline of the potential that a phylogenetic approach may bring to the study of alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs) and discuss some of the difficulties and methodological problems that must be addressed if we are to apply the phylogenetic method successfully. We illustrate the principles presented by applying them to three selected examples. Specifically, based on fish studies, ARTs are, at least in some fish groups, evolutionarily unstable and rarely become incorporated as a fixed trait of a lineage at a rank as high as a family. Despite this instability, it is common for a given lineage to give rise recurrently to very similar forms of ARTs. Our results illustrate the wide spectrum of potential studies that can be enriched by a phylogenetic perspective.

BACKGROUND

The role of phylogenetic studies in the behavioral sciences

When Tinbergen (1963) formulated his famous four levels of explanation in ethology – causation, development, evolution, and function – the study of patterns in the evolution of behavior was explicitly made one of the central aims of the study of animal behavior. Each behavior pattern has an evolutionary history, and often it is possible to trace its origins, identifying the behavior that existed prior to the emergence of the new patterns. The pioneering work of Konrad Lorenz, who used behavior patterns to help to clarify the taxonomy of ducks, illustrates the use of behavioral phylogenies in an outstanding way (Lorenz 1941).

Type
Chapter
Information
Alternative Reproductive Tactics
An Integrative Approach
, pp. 52 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almada, V. C. and Santos, R. S. 1995. Parental care in the rocky intertidal: a case study of adaptation and exaptation in Mediterranean and Atlantic blennies. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 5, 23–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almada, F., Almada, V. C., Domingues, V., Brito, A., and Santos, R. S. 2005a. Molecular validation of the specific status of Parablennius sanguinolentus and Parablennius parvicornis (Pisces: Blenniidae). Scientia Marina 69, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almada, F., Almada, V., Guillemaud, T., and Wirtz, P. 2005b. Phylogenetic relationships of the north-eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean blenniids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 86, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almada, V., Almada, F., Henriques, M., Santos, R. S., and Brito, A. 2002. On the phylogenetic affinities of Centrolabrus trutta and Centrolabrus caeruleus (Perciformes: Labridae) to the genus Symphodus: molecular, meristic and behavioural evidences. Arquipélago: Life and Marine Sciences 19A, 85–92.Google Scholar
Blanchefield, P. J., Ridgway, M. S., and Wilson, C. C. 2003. Breeding success of male brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) in the wild. Molecular Ecology 12, 2417–2428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, D. R. and McLennan, D. A. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Crespi, B. J. and Fulton, M. J. 2004. Molecular systematics of Salmonidae: combined nuclear data yields a robust phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31, 658–679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeWoody, J. A., Fletcher, D. E, Wilkins, S. D., Nelson, W. S., and Avise, J. C. 1998. Molecular genetic dissection of spawning, parentage, and reproductive tactics in a population of redbreast sunfish Lepomis auritus. Evolution 52, 1802–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWoody, J. A., Fletcher, D. E., Mackiewicz, M., Wilkins, S. D., and Avise, J. C. 2000. The genetic mating system of spotted sunfish (Lepomis punctatus): mate numbers and the influence of male reproductive parasites. Molecular Ecology 9, 2119–2128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds.) 2005. FishBase. Available online at www.fishbase.org, version (05/2005).
Garant, D., Dodson, J. J., and Bernatchez, L. 2003. Differential reproductive success and heritability of alternative reproductive tactics in wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Evolution 57, 1133–1141.Google Scholar
Garcia-Vazquez, E., Moran, P., Martinez, J. L., et al. 2001. Alternative mating strategies in Atlantic salmon and brown trout. Journal of Heredity 92, 146–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonçalves, D., Fagundes, T., and Oliveira, R. 2003. Reproductive behaviour of sneaker males of the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 528–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, E. J., Almada, V. C., Oliveira, R. F., and Santos, A. J. 1996. Female mimicry as a mating tactic in males of the blenniid fish Salaria pavo. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 76, 529–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, N. B., Balshine-Earn, S., and Reynolds, J. D. 1998. Evolutionary transitions in parental care in cichlid fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265, 2265–2272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. 1982. Exaptation: a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1982. Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 60, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, M. R. 1984. Sunfish, salmon, and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies and tactics in fishes. In Wootton, R. and Potts, G. (eds.) Fish Reproduction: Strategies and Tactics, pp. 55–75. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gross, M. R. and Charnov, E. L. 1980. Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 77, 6937–6940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haase, M. 2005. Rapid and convergent evolution of parental care in hydrobiid gastropods from New Zealand. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, B. G. 2004. Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy, 2nd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Hanel, R., Westneat, M., and Sturmbauer, C. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships, evolution of broodcare behaviour, and geographic speciation in the wrasse tribe Labrini. Journal of Molecular Evolution 55, 776–789.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harvey, P. H. and Pagel, M. D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, P. H., Leigh Brown, A. J., Maynard Smith, J., and Nee, S. (eds.) 1996. New Uses for New Phylogenies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1965. Phylogenetic systematics. Annual Review of Entomology 10, 97–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Hino, T., Maekawa, K., and Reynolds, J. B. 1990. Alternative male mating behaviours in landlocked Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) in south-central Alaska. Journal of Ethology 8, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koblmüller, S., Salzburger, W., and Sturmbauer, C. 2004. Evolutionary relationships in the sand-dwelling cichlid lineage of Lake Tanganyika suggest multiple colonization of rocky habitats and convergent origin of biparental mouthbrooding. Journal of Molecular Evolution 58, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koseki, Y. and Maekawa, K. 2002. Differential energy allocation of alternative male tactics in masu salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59, 1717–1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. 1941. Vergleichende Bewegungsstudien an Anatinen. Journal für Ornithologie (Ergänzungsband 3) 89, 194–294.Google Scholar
Mackiewicz, M., Fletcher, D. E., Wilkins, S. D., DeWoody, J. A., and Avise, J. C. 2002. A genetic assessment of parentage in a natural population of dollar sunfish (Lepomis marginatus) based on microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11, 1877–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, W. P. and Maddison, D. R. 2005. Mesquite: A Modular System for Evolutionary Analysis, version 1.06. Available online at http://mesquiteproject.org.
Martinez, J. L., Moran, P., Perez, J., et al. 2000. Multiple paternity increases effective size of southern Atlantic salmon populations. Molecular Ecology 9, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martins, E. P. (ed.) 1996. Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McPhail, J. D. and Baxter, J. S. 1996. A Review of Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Life-History and Habitat Use in Relation to Compensation and Improvement Opportunities, Fisheries Management Report No. 104. Vancouver, BC.
Moran, P. and Garcia-Vazquez, E. 1998. Multiple paternity in Atlantic salmon: a way to maintain genetic variability in relicted populations. Journal of Heredity 89, 551–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neat, F. C., Lengkeek, W., Westerbeek, E. P., Laarhoven, B., and Videler, J. J. 2003a. Behavioural and morphological differences between lake and river populations of Salaria fluviatilis. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 374–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neat, F. C., Locatello, L., and Rasotto, M. B. 2003b. Reproductive morphology in relation to alternative male reproductive tactics in Scartella cristata. Journal of Fish Biology 62, 1381–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neff, B. D. 2001. Genetic paternity analysis and breeding success in bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Journal of Heredity 92, 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, J. S. 2006. Fishes of the World, 4th edn.New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Almada, V. C., Forsgren, E., and Gonçalves, E. J. 1999. Temporal variation in male traits, nesting aggregations and mating success in the peacock blenny, Salaria pavo. Journal of Fish Biology 54, 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Almada, V. C., Gonçalves, E. J., Forsgreen, E., and Canário, A. V. M. 2001a. Androgen levels in males and social interactions in breeding males of the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 58, 897–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, R. F., Canário, A. V. M., and Grober, M. S. 2001b. Male sexual polymorphism, alternative reproductive tactics and androgens in combtooth blennies (Pisces: Blenniidae). Hormones and Behavior 40, 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R. D. M. and Holmes, E. C. 1998. Molecular Evolution: A Phylogenetic Approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific.Google Scholar
Peach, M. B. and Rouse, G. W. 2004. Phylogenetic trends in the abundance and distribution of pit organs of elasmobranches. Acta Zoologica 85, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruchon, F., Laugier, T., and Quignard, J. P. 1995. Alternative male reproductive strategies in the peacock blenny. Journal of Fish Biology 47, 826–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, R. S. 1995. Anatomy and histology of secondary sexual characters, gonads and liver of the rock-pool blenny (Parablennius sanguinolentus parvicornis) of the Azores. Arquipélago: Life and Marine Sciences 13A, 21–38.Google Scholar
Santos, R. S., Hawkins, S. J., and Nash, R. D. M. 1996. Reproductive phenology of the Azorean rock-pool blenny (Parablennius sanguinolentus parvicornis), a fish with alternative mating tactics. Journal of Fish Biology 48, 842–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1994. Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in the Study of Behavior 23, 1–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taborsky, M. 1998. Sperm competition in fish: “bourgeois” males and parasitic spawning. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 222–227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taborsky, M. 1999. Conflict or cooperation: what determines optimal solutions to competition in fish reproduction? In Oliveira, R., Almada, V., and Gonçalves, E. (eds.) Behaviour and Conservation of Littoral Fishes, pp. 301–349. Lisbon: Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada.Google Scholar
Taborsky, M. 2001. The evolution of bourgeois, parasitic, and cooperative reproductive behaviors in fishes. Journal of Heredity 92, 100–110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, N. 1963. On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 20, 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiegmann, D. D., Baylis, J. R., and Hoff, M. H. 1997. Male fitness, body size and timing of reproduction in smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieui. Ecology 78, 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willson, M. F. 1997. Variation in Salmonid Life Histories: Patterns and Perspectives, Research Paper No. 498. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Wilson, A. B., Ahnesjö, I., Vincent, A. C. J., and Meyer, A. 2003. The dynamics of male brooding, mating patterns and sex roles in pipefishes and seahorses (Family Syngnathidae). Evolution 57, 1374–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×