Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T00:26:51.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 5 - From Future Orientation to Future-Making

Towards Adolescents’ Transformative Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2023

Nick Hopwood
Affiliation:
University of Technology, Sydney
Annalisa Sannino
Affiliation:
Tampere University, Finland
Get access

Summary

In cultural-historical activity theory, the move from orientation to action is connected to the experiencing of contradictions as personally significant conflicts of motives. Our study builds on the theory of transformative agency by double stimulation (TADS). We conducted a Change Laboratory intervention with adolescents to support them to work on their motive conflicts and to construct and implement projects they found significant. With the help of Sannino’s model, we analyse the evolution of students’ projects as efforts to move from mental future orientation to practical and material future-making. In our data, the conflict of motives and the creation of second stimuli emerged as the most critical steps in the TADS process. We argue that it is time to make the shift from studying young people’s future orientations as private mental phenomena to fostering and analysing future-making as material public actions that generate use-value and have an impact beyond the individual.

Type
Chapter
Information
Agency and Transformation
Motives, Mediation, and Motion
, pp. 107 - 138
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blomquist, T., Hällgren, M., Nilsson, A. & Söderholm, A. (2010). Project-as-practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project Management Journal, 41(1), 516. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambridge University Press. (2022). Project. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved 1 July 2022 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/project.Google Scholar
Carabelli, G. & Lyon, D. (2016). Young people’s orientations to the future: Navigating the present and imagining the future. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(8), 1110–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1145641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
City of Helsinki. (2020). Helsinki alueittain 2019/Helsingfors områdesvis/Helsinki by district. City of Helsinki, Executive Office, Urban Research and Statistics. www.hel.fi/hel2/tietokeskus/julkaisut/pdf/20_06_10_Hki_Alueittain_2019_Tikkanen.pdf.Google Scholar
Cussins, A. (1992). Content, embodiment and objectivity: The theory of cognitive trails. Mind, 101(404), 651–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/101.404.651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devadason, R. (2008). To plan or not to plan? Young adult future orientations in two European cities. Sociology, 42(6), 1127–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508096937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R. & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1938). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2016). Expansive learning on the move: Insights from ongoing research/El aprendizaje expansivo en movimiento: Aportaciones de la investigación en curso. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 39(3), 401–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2016.1189119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Suntio, A. (2002). Can a school community learn to master its own future? An activity‐theoretical study of expansive learning among middle school teachers. In Wells, G. & Claxton, G. (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 211–24). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y., Nuttall, J. & Hopwood, N. (2022). Transformative agency by double stimulation: Advances in theory and methodology. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 30(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1805499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y., Sannino, A. & Virkkunen, J. (2014). On the methodological demands of formative interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 21(2), 118–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2014.891868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erstad, O. & Silseth, K. (2019). Futuremaking and digital engagement: From everyday interests to educational trajectories. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(4), 309–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1646290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare. (2022). School health promotion study. Retrieved 11 July 2022 from https://thl.fi/en/web/thlfi-en/research-and-development/research-and-projects/school-health-promotion-study.Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Holt-Giménez, E. (2006). Campesino a campesino: Voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Food First Books.Google Scholar
Hopwood, N. & Gottschalk, B. (2017). Double stimulation ‘in the wild’: Services for families with children at-risk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 13, 2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.01.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. (1997). Sociality with objects: Social relations in postsocial knowledge societies. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(4), 130. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327697014004001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, M. T. (2019). Education and the concept of commons: A pedagogical reinterpretation. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(4), 445–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1485564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, M. F. & Engeström, Y. (2018). Collective concept formation in educational management: An intervention study in São Paulo, Brazil. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri / Estonian Journal of Education, 6(1), 3256. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2018.6.1.02b.Google Scholar
Leont’ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Literat, I. (2013). Participatory mapping with urban youth: The visual elicitation of socio-spatial research data. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(2), 198216. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.782037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10(2), 177200. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00132516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mische, A. (2009). Projects and possibilities: Researching futures in action. Sociological Forum, 24(3), 694704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2009.01127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morselli, D. & Sannino, A. (2021). Testing the model of double stimulation in a Change Laboratory. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsen, A. (1999). Where is the future? Time and space as categories in analyses of young people’s images of the future. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 12(2), 175–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.1999.9968596.Google Scholar
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, C. J., Maclean, K., Hill, R., Bock, E. & Rist, P. (2016). Participatory mapping to negotiate indigenous knowledge used to assess environmental risk. Sustainability Science, 11(1), 115–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0292-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A. (2008a). Experiencing conversations: Bridging the gap between discourse and activity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(3), 267–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00371.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A. (2008b). From talk to action: Experiencing interlocution in developmental interventions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(3), 234–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749030802186769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A. (2015). The principle of double stimulation: A path to volitional action. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 6, 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2015.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A. (2022). Transformative agency as warping: How collectives accomplish change amidst uncertainty. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 30(1), 933. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2020.1805493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A., Engeström, Y. & Jokinen, E. (2021). Digital peer learning for transformative professional agency: The case of homelessness practitioners in Finland. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1612–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sannino, A., Engeström, Y. & Lemos, M. (2016). Formative interventions for expansive learning and transformative agency. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 599633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and ecological perspectives. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sica, L. S., Crocetti, E., Ragozini, G., Aleni Sestito, L. & Serafini, T. (2016). Future-oriented or present-focused? The role of social support and identity styles on ‘futuring’ in Italian late adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of Youth Studies, 19(2), 183203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2015.1059925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. C. (1998). On the origin of objects. The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, N. A. & Byrne, O. (2022). Imagining futures: Theorizing the practical knowledge of future-making. Organization Studies, 43(2), 247–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406211053222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetoshkina, L., Engeström, Y. & Sannino, A. (2017). On the power of the object: History-making through skilled performance in wooden boat building. In Sandberg, J., Rouleau, L., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.), Skillful performance: Enacting capabilities, knowledge, competence, and expertise in organizations (pp. 73102). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Virkkunen, J. & Newnham, D. S. (2013). The Change Laboratory: A tool for collaborative development of work and education. Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, D. (2011). Young people and the future: Multiple temporal orientations shaped in interaction with significant others. Young, 19(2), 111–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/110330881001900201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×