Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:04:16.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - The Downturn in Tepecik-Çiftlik’s Ceramic Production Continuity

An Insight toward the Rapid Emergence of Supra-Regional Homogeneity in Ceramic Style

from Part II - Anatolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2022

Peter F. Biehl
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Eva Rosenstock
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Get access

Summary

We intend to decipher both a chronological and a cultural problematic raised by the sudden appearance of geometric incised decorations on Anatolian potteries, seemingly at the beginning of the 6th millennium cal BC. Frequently designated as “Gelveri type” in reference to the Gelveri-Güzelyurt Cappadocian pottery assemblage, the lack of a reliable chronology based on a good stratigraphy at the site made it difficult to cope with the nature of such pottery style’s development. Ten years of excavations at Tepecik-Çiftlik as well as recent archaeological work at Gelveri has provided us with new stratigraphic and decor-related technological evidence. Hence, we have the possibility to analyse the emergence and the development of such pottery styles within a reliable archaeological context. Seen on such a large geographical scale, covering at least the entire Anatolian plateau, the nature of this pottery style development cannot be considered as a pottery phenomenon in itself only. It is necessary to investigate the cultural interactions at play, enabling stylistic patterns to be shared within different cultural areas.

Type
Chapter
Information
6000 BC
Transformation and Change in the Near East and Europe
, pp. 104 - 124
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Arık, Remzi O. 1937 Türk Tarih Kurumu taradından yapılan Alaca Höyük hafriyatı: 1935’deki çalışmalara ve keşiflere ait ilk rapor. Türk Tarih Kurumu, Ankara.Google Scholar
Atalay, Sonya 2005 Domesticating Clay: The Role of Clay Balls, Mini Balls and Geometric Objects in Daily Life at Çatalhöyük. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 136168. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bıçakçı, Erhan, Algül, Çiler Altınbilek, Balcı, Semra and Godon, Martin 2007 Tepecik-Çiftlik. In Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem: Anadolu’da uygarlığın doğuşu ve Avrupa’ya yayılımı. yeni kazılar, yeni bulgular, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 237253. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Bıçakçı, Erhan, Godon, Martin and Çakan, Yasın G. 2012 Tepecik-Çiftlik. In The Neolithic in Turkey, New Excavations and New Research. Volume 3: Central Turkey, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet, Başgelen, Nezih and Kuniholm, Peter, pp. 89134. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Binder, Didier, Gassin, Bernard and Sénépart, Ingrid 1994 Éléments pour la caractérisation des productions céramiques néolithiques dans le sud de la France: l’exemple de Giribaldi. In Terre cuite et société: la céramique, document technique, économique, culturel, actes des rencontres 21–23 octobre 1993, edited by Centre de Recherches Archéologiques du CNRS, pp. 147161. APDCA Association pour la promotion et la diffusion des connaissances archéologiques, Juan-les-Pins.Google Scholar
Bittel, Kurt 1953 Büyükkaya. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 86:4855.Google Scholar
Bittel, Kurt 1969/1970 Bemerkungen über die Prähistorische Ansiedlung auf dem Fikirtepe bei Kadıköy (Istanbul). Istanbuler Mitteilungen 19/20:119.Google Scholar
Bittel, Kurt and Otto, Heinz 1939 Demirci Hüyük: Eine vorgeschichtliche Siedlung an der phrygisch-bithynischen Grenze, Bericht über der die Ergebnisse der Grabung von 1937. Archäologisches Institut des Deutschen Reiches, Berlin.Google Scholar
Branting, Scott A. 1996 The Alişar Regional Survey 1993–1994: A Preliminary Report. Anatolica 22:145158.Google Scholar
Brown, G. H. 1967 Prehistoric Pottery from the Antitaurus. Anatolian Studies 17:125164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caneva, Isabella, and Sevin, Veli (eds.) 2004 Mersin-Yumuktepe: A Reappraisal. Congedo, Lecce.Google Scholar
Caneva, Isabella and Köroğlu, Gülgün 2008 Excavations at Mersin Yumuktepe Höyüğü in 2006. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 29/2:379388.Google Scholar
Cessford, Craig 2005 Absolute Dating at Çatalhöyük. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 6599. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Copley, Mark, Clark, Catherina and Evershed, Richard 2005 Organic-residue Analysis of Pottery Vessels and Clay Balls. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 169174. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Efe, Turan 1989 Three Early Sites in the Vicinity of Eskişehir: Asmainler, Kalıntaş and Kes Kaya. Anatolica 16:3160.Google Scholar
Efe, Turan 1990 An Inland Anatolian Site with Pre-Vinča Elements: Orman Fidanlığı, Eskişehir. A Re-examination of Balkan-Anatolian Connections in the Fifth Millennium B.C. Germania 68:67133.Google Scholar
Efe, Turan 1996 1995 Yılında Kütahya, Bilecik ve Eskişehir Illerinde yapılan yüzey araştırmaları. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 142: 215232.Google Scholar
Efe, Turan 2001 The Salvage Excavations at Orman Fidanliği: A Chalcolithic Site in Inland Northwestern Anatolia. Tarih Arkeoloji Sanat ve Kültür Mirasını KorumaVakfi Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Efe, Turan 2005 Neolithization in Inland Northwestern Anatolia. In How Did Farming Reach Europe? Anatolian-European Relations from the Second Half of the 7th through the First Half of the 6th Millenium BC, edited by Lichter, Clemes, pp. 107115. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Erdoğu, Burçin and Kayacan, Nurcan 2004 Drive into the White Lake: 2003 Field Survey in the Tuz Gölü Region of Central Anatolia. Anatolia Antiqua 7:217226.Google Scholar
Esin, Ufuk 1993 Gelveri: Ein Beispiel für die kulturellen Beziehungen zwischen Zentralanatolien und Südosteuropa während des Chalkolithikums. Anatolica 19:4756.Google Scholar
Franz, Ingmar 2007 West Mound Excavations, Trenches 5/7 Pottery. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2007:127–131. Electronic document, www.catalhoyuk.com/downloads/Archive_Report_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
Franz, Ingmar 2010 West Mound Trenches 5–7 Pottery. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2010:77–90. Electronic document, www.catalhoyuk.com/downloads/Archive_Report_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
French, David 1955 Early Pottery Sites from Western Anatolia. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology. British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, Ankara.Google Scholar
French, David 1965 Prehistoric Sites in the Göksu Valley. Anatolian Studies 15:177201.Google Scholar
French, David 1967 Prehistoric Sites in Northwest Anatolia I: The İznik Area. Anatolian Studies 17:49100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, David 1969 Prehistoric Sites in Northwest Anatolia II: The Balıkesir and Akhisar/Manisa Areas. Anatolian Studies 19:4198.Google Scholar
French, David 2005 Canhasan I: The Pottery. British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, Ankara.Google Scholar
Garstang, John. 1953. Prehistoric Mersin: Yümük Tepe in Southern Turkey. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gérard, Frédéric and Thissen, Laurens (eds.) 2002 The Neolithic of Central Anatolia: Internal Developments and External Relations During the 9th–6th millennia cal BC, Proceedings of the International CANeW Table Ronde, Istanbul, 23–24 November 2001. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Godon, Martin 2010 De l’empreinte à l’outil, de la trace à la fonction: exemples d’outils de potiers dans le Néolithique Céramique centro-anatolien (7000–5500 BC cal). In Outils de potiers néolithiques: traditions techniques et organisation des productions céramiques, edited by Julien Vieugué and Yolaine Maigrot. Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 107/4:691707.Google Scholar
Godon, Martin 2012 Cappadocia’s First Pottery Production: Tepecik-Çiftlik Earliest Levels. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı 29/3: 317340.Google Scholar
Goldman, Hetty 1956 Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus II: From the Neolithic through the Bronze Age. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gorny, Ronald L. 1995 The Alişar Regional Project 1994. Anatolica 21:65100.Google Scholar
Gülçür, Sevil 1997 Aksaray, Nevşehir, Niğde İlleri 1995 Ortak Yüzey Araştırması. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 14/2:401411.Google Scholar
Gülçur, Sevil 2002 Aksaray, Nevşehir, Niğde İlleri 2000 Yüzey Araştırması. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 19/2:271281.Google Scholar
Gülçur, Sevil 2004 Güvercinkayası: The Black/Dark Burnished Pottery, General Overview, Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 7:141164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gülçur, Sevil 2008 Gelveri -Yüksekkilise 2007 Sondaj Calısması. Türk Eski Çağ Enstitüsü Haberler Bulteni 25:22.Google Scholar
Gülçur, Sevil and Kiper, Yücel 2009 Gelveri-Yüksekkilise 2007 Yılı Sondaj Çalışması. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 30/4:285296.Google Scholar
Harmankaya, Savaş, Tanındı, Oğuz and Özbaşaran, Mihriban 1998 Türkiye Arkeoloji Yerleşmeleri 3: Kalkolitik. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2005 Changing Entanglements and Temporalities. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 122. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2006 Çatalhöyük, the Leopard’s Tale: Revealing the Mysteries of Turkey’s Ancient “Town.” Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Karul, Necmi 2007 Aktopraklık: Kuzeybatı Anadolu’da Gelişkin Bir Köy. In Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem: Anadolu’da Uygarlığın Doğuşu ve Avrupa’ya Yayılımı. Yeni Kazılar, Yeni Bulgular, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 387392. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Karul, Necmi and Avcı, Mert B. 2011 Neolithic Communities in the Eastern Marmara Region: Aktopraklık C. Anatolica 37:115.Google Scholar
Koşay, Hamit Z. 1963 Alaca Höyük ve Güllücek buluntularına göre Anadolu ve Balkanlar prehistuvarı arasındaki identite ve diversite’ler. Belleten 27/106:297304.Google Scholar
Koşay, Hamit Z., and Akok, Mahmut 1948 Büyük Güllücek araştırmaları üzerine ilk rapor. Belleten 12/46:471478.Google Scholar
Last, Jonathan 2005 Pottery from the East Mound. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, 101138. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lichter, Clemens 2005 Western Anatolia in the Late Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic: The Actual State of Research. In How Did Farming Reach Europe? Anatolian-European Relations from the Second Half of the 7th through the First Half of the 6th Millenium BC, edited by Lichter, Clemens, pp. 5974. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Makkay, Janos 1993 Pottery Links between Late Neolithic Cultures of the NW Pontic and Anatolia, and the Origins of the Hittites. Anatolica 19:117128.Google Scholar
Marro, Catherine, Özdoğan, Aslı and Tibet, Aksel 1996 Prospection archéologique franco-turque dans la région de Kastamonu (Mer Noire): premier rapport préliminaire. Anatolia Antiqua 4:273290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, Roger, Pollard, Tom and Ramage, Michael 1998 Project Paphlagonia: Survey in Northern Anatolia. In Ancient Anatolia: Fifty Years’ Work by the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, edited by Matthews, Roger, pp. 1724. British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, London.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1955 Some Prehistoric Sites in North-Western Anatolia. Istanbuler Mitteilungen 6:5388.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1958 The Neolithic Obsidian Industry of Ilicapınar and Its Relations. Istanbuler Mitteilungen 8:8292.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1961 Early Cultures of the South Anatolian Plateau. Anatolian Studies 11:159184.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1965 Çatal Höyük West. Anatolian Studies 15:135156.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1967 Çatal Hüyük: A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Omura, Sachihiro 1991 1989 yılı Kırşehir, Yozgat, Nevşehir, Aksaray illeri içinde yürütülen yüzey araştırmaları. Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı 8:6989.Google Scholar
Özbal, Rana and Gerritsen, Fokke 2011 2009 Yılı Barçın Höyük Kazıları. 32. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 2:198208.Google Scholar
Özbudak, M. Ozan 2010 Gelveri Kültürü. Unpublished MA thesis, Prehistory Department, Istanbul University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Mehmet 1985 Marmara bölgesinde kültür tarihi ile ilgili bazı sorunlar ve bunların çözumüne jeomorfoloji araştırmalarının katkısı. Arkeometri Sonuçları Toplantısı 1:139162.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Mehmet 1993 Vinča and Anatolia: A New Look at a Very Old Problem (or Redefining the Vinča Culture from the Perspective of Near Eastern Tradition). Anatolica 19: 174193.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Mehmet 1994 Marmara Bölgesi-Balkanlar-Orta Anadolu arasındaki kronoloji sorununa yeni bir yaklaşım. In 11th Türk Tarih Kongresi, Ankara, 5–9 Eylül 1990: Kongreye sunulan bildiriler, pp. 6979. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, Ankara.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Mehmet 1999 Northwestern Turkey: Neolithic Cultures In Between the Balkans and Anatolia. In Neolithic in Turkey: The Cradle of Civilization, New Discoveries, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 203224. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Mehmet 2005 The Expansion of the Neolithic Way of Life: What We Know and What We Do Not Know. In How Did Farming Reach Europe? Anatolian-European Relations from the Second Half of the 7th through the First Half of the 6th Millenium BC, edited by Lichter, Clemens, pp. 1327. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, Mehmet 2007 Marmara Bölgesi Neolitik cağ Kültürleri. In Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 401426. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Öztan, Aliye 2002 Köşk-Höyük: Anadolu arkeolojisine yeni katkılar. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 5:5569.Google Scholar
Öztan, Aliye 2007 Köşk Höyuk: Niğde-Bor ovası’nda bir Neolitik yerleşim. In Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem: Anadolu’da uygarlığın doğuşu ve Avrupa’ya yayılımı. yeni kazılar, yeni bulgular, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 223226. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Öztan, Aliye 2012 Köşk Höyük. A Neolithic Settlement in Niğde-Bor Plateau. In The Neolithic in Turkey, New Excavations and New Research. Central Türkey, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet, Başgelen, Nezih and Kuniholm, Peter, pp. 3170. Archaeology and Art Publications, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Öztan, Aliye and Özkan, Süleyman 2003 Çizi ve Nokta Bezekli Köşk Höyük Seramikleri. In From Village to Cities: Early Villages in the Near East, Studies Presented to Ufuk Esin, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet, Hauptmann, Harald and Başgelen, Nezih, pp. 447458. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Paley, Sam 2006 The Excavations at Cadır Höyük 2004. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 27/1:351356.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, Jacob, Thissen, Laurens and Buitenhuis, Hilke 1989 Preliminary Report on the Archaeological Investigations at Ilıpınar in NW Anatolia. Anatolica 16:61144.Google Scholar
Roodenberg, Jacob, Van As, A., Jacobs, L. and Wijnen, M. H. 2003 Early Settlement in the Plain of Yenişehir (NW Anaytolia). The Basal Occupation Layers at Menteşe. Anatolica 29:1759.Google Scholar
Schoop, Ulf D. 2005a Das anatolische Chalkolithikum: Eine chronologische Untersuchung zur vorbronzezeitlichen Kultursequenz im nördlichen Zentralanatolien und den angrenzenden Gebieten. Albert Greiner, Remshalden.Google Scholar
Schoop, Ulf D. 2005b Early Chalcolithic in North-Central Anatolia: The Evidence from Boğazköy-Büyükkaya. Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Arkeoloji Dergisi 8:1537.Google Scholar
Schoop, Ulf D., and Schoop, Esra 2011 Çamlıbel Tarlası kazısı: 2009 yılı çalışmaları. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 32:221224.Google Scholar
Seton-Williams, Majory V. 1954 Cilician Survey. Anatolian Studies 4:121174.Google Scholar
Silistreli, Uğur 1983 Recent Archaeological Research in Turkey: Pınarbaşı-Bor 1982. Anatolian Studies 33:258259.Google Scholar
Silistreli, Uğur 1984 Pınarbaşı ve Köşk Höyükleri. Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 5:8185.Google Scholar
Silistreli, Uğur 1985 Köşkhöyük. Anatolian Studies 34:199201.Google Scholar
Summers, Geoffrey D. 1991 Chalcolithic Pottery from Kabakulak (Niğde) Collected by Ian Todd. Anatolian Studies 4:125131.Google Scholar
Tezcan, Burhan 1958 Aksaray çevresinden derlenen eserler. Belleten 12:517526.Google Scholar
Thissen, Laurens C. 2002 CANeW 14C Database and C14 Charts: Anatolia, 10,000–5000 cal BC. In The Neolithic of Central Anatolia: Internal Developments and External Relations During the 9th–6th millennia cal BC, Proceedings of the International CANeW Table Ronde, Istanbul, 23–24 November 2001, edited by Gérard, Frédéric and Thissen, Laurens, pp. 299337. Ege Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Thissen, Laurens C. 2008 The Pottery of Phase VB. In The Ilıpınar Excavations III: Life and Death in a Prehistoric Settlement in Northwest Anatolia, edited by Roodenberg, Jacob J. and Roodenberg, Songül Alpaslan, pp. 91116. Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, Leiden.Google Scholar
Todd, Ian 1966 Surface Finds from Various Sites: Central Anatolian Survey. Anatolian Studies 16:1516.Google Scholar
Todd, Ian 1967 Central Anatolian Survey. Anatolian Studies 17:1112.Google Scholar
Todd, Ian 1980 The Prehistory of Central Anatolia I: The Neolithic Period. Åström, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Von der Osten, Hans H. 1937 The Alishar Höyük Season of 1930 and 1932 Part I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Yakar, Jak 1991 Prehistoric Anatolia: The Neolithic Transformation and Early Chalcolithic Period. Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
Yalman, Nurcan and Özdöl, Serap 2003 Pottery Report. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2003:87–93, electronic document, www.catalhoyuk.com/downloads/Archive_Report_2003.pdf.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×