Migraine is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide and a recognized contributor to health disparities with public health implications. Although migraine is a highly prevalent neurological condition, research on the cognitive manifestations of migraines is inconsistent. Studies have confirmed neurocognitive compromise during the presence of a migraine attack, with it’s onset and frequency being associated with greater cognitive decline. Research on the cognitive implications of migraines in underserved communities is scarce. The American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention Study (2015) found that the prevalence of chronic migraines was the highest amongst Hispanic females compared to White females. Latina/os are 50% less likely to receive a migraine diagnosis and adequate headache medication when compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Latina women were more likely to report somatic symptoms than White and African American participants (F=8.96; p>0.001) (Liefland et al., 2014). Somatoform disorders are often diagnosed amongst Latina/os to account for medical unexplained symptoms, and if misdiagnosed can be stigmatizing and detrimental to treatment. We illustrate the critical role that neuropsychologists play by utilizing Socially Responsible Neuropsychology (SRN), a theoretical framework that promotes equitable and precise neuropsychological care to reduce misdiagnosis, elucidate cognitive implications, and address the complex medical needs of Latina/o/ patients. Given the limited literature on migraines and neurocognitive functioning, our objective is to present two case studies to illustrate the neuropsychological implications among bilingual Latina/o with chronic migraines.

Two highly educated Latina/o women, ages 39 and 41 years old, with chronic migraines, cognitive decline, diagnoses and a history of somatization symptoms. The onset of symptoms was gradual, worsening in intensity and frequency, along with notable motor symptoms (e.g., paralysis, weakness, numbness, bilateral tremors), photophobia, and phonophobia. Their cognitive complaints were conceptualized as part of a somatoform presentation by their providers.

The SRN model guided clinical decision-making to establish reliable normative anchors to identify relative impairment compared to premorbid estimates. Testing was completed in English after establishing language dominance via English and Spanish measures of verbal fluency. Cognitive profiles identified declines in attention, processing speed, language, perceptual reasoning, visual memory, executive functioning, motor functioning, and notable decline in their functioning over several years. The neuropsychological profile discounted the presence of a somatoform disorder. One case was diagnosed with an Unspecified Mild Neurocognitive Disorder, while the other case met criteria for a Major Neurocognitive Disorder due to Multiple Etiologies (i.e., vascular contribution, migraines, history of other contributions- choking episode).

Given the decline in each profile, it was hypothesized that the patients’ utilization of compensatory strategies and higher education may have masked the onset of symptoms. These complex cases highlight the need for comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations that are culturally and linguistically responsive to boost the sensitivity of accurate diagnosis. The ability to objectively capture neurocognitive decline offers a unique opportunity to enhance treatment, which would have otherwise remained undetected and untreated. The SRN model enhanced diagnostic considerations, treatment planning, and allowed for advocacy strategies to improve the quality of life, and access to culturally/linguistically appropriate resources.

Arachnoid cysts are fluid-filled sacs thought to be a developmental abnormality which form as a result of splitting or duplication of the arachnoid membrane. In most cases, arachnoid cysts are congenital and asymptomatic throughout an individual’s life. Rarely, arachnoid cysts develop because of head injury, intraventricular hemorrhage of prematurity, presence of a tumor, infection or surgery on the brain. Intracranial cysts are typically incidental brain imaging findings and most commonly located in the middle fossa, the suprasellar region, and the posterior fossa. In cases where the cyst enlarges significantly individuals may experience symptoms of increased intracranial pressure, mass effects, seizures, nausea and vomiting, focal neurological deficits, or hydrocephalus. This presentation compares the differing symptom presentation of two individuals with medically confirmed arachnoid cysts -- one in the middle cranial fossa region (Patient A) and the other in the posterior cranial fossa region (Patient B).

The 2 patients were referred to a private practice neuropsychological clinic for neuropsychological assessment. Patient A was a 39-year-old, right-handed, married Syrian male with 12 years if education, unemployed at the time of testing. Changes in cognition, behavior and personality were reported for Patient A approximately two years after a known cerebrovascular accident. Patient B was a 48-year-old, left-handed married Caucasian male with 16 years of education, on disability due to his medical condition. Patient B reported severe memory impairment, speech and language deficits, variable attention, executive dysfunction, impaired gait with falls, emotional dysregulation, and sleep difficulties. He was diagnosed with bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder in remission for 9 years.

Neuropsychological testing results for Patient A were not valid, due to initiation difficulties, paranoia about the testing and consequent limited engagement in the process. Predominant symptoms were consistent with negative symptoms of schizophrenia, (i.e., avolition, abulia, and diminished emotional expression); no positive symptoms were observed or reported. His speech was limited -he lacked spontaneous speech and only responded to direct questions. His informant completed a measure assessing pre/post changes in frontal systems and there were significant increases in apathy and executive dysfunction reported. Neuropsychological results collected from Patient B revealed mild to severe impairment of aspects of executive functioning, memory, processing speed, visual attention, expressive language, and manual dexterity bilaterally and manual motor strength - more consistent with subcortical neurological disease. Self-report and informant data revealed significant difficulties with functional abilities, pre/post changes in frontal systems (apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction), sleep efficiency and daytime fatigue, and psychological distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms).

The presenting case analysis illustrates the importance of neuropsychology in identifying and tracking the nature of symptoms associated with neuroimaging confirmed arachnoid cysts. This case analysis is unique as it highlights the complexities of differing symptom phenotypes of the same condition due to location of the cyst. Surgical intervention usually through draining the cyst directly or implantation of a shunt is typically recommended for symptomatic patients and that course of treatment was suggested to both patients. Treatment recommendations geared to target psychosocial and functional difficulties should also be considered.

Cognition is commonly affected in brain disorders. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may have procognitive effects, with high tolerability. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in improving cognition, in schizophrenia, depression, dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, traumatic brain injury, and multiple sclerosis.

A PRISMA systematic search was conducted for randomized controlled trials. Hedges' g was used to quantify effect sizes (ES) for changes in cognition after TMS/tDCS v. sham. As different cognitive functions may have unequal susceptibility to TMS/tDCS, we separately evaluated the effects on: attention/vigilance, working memory, executive functioning, processing speed, verbal fluency, verbal learning, and social cognition.

We included 82 studies (n = 2784). For working memory, both TMS (ES = 0.17, p = 0.015) and tDCS (ES = 0.17, p = 0.021) showed small but significant effects. Age positively moderated the effect of TMS. TDCS was superior to sham for attention/vigilance (ES = 0.20, p = 0.020). These significant effects did not differ across the type of brain disorder. Results were not significant for the other five cognitive domains.

Our results revealed that both TMS and tDCS elicit a small trans-diagnostic effect on working memory, tDCS also improved attention/vigilance across diagnoses. Effects on the other domains were not significant. Observed ES were small, yet even slight cognitive improvements may facilitate daily functioning. While NIBS can be a well-tolerated treatment, its effects appear domain specific and should be applied only for realistic indications (i.e. to induce a small improvement in working memory or attention).