We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To send content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about sending content to .
To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Let
${{\Theta }^{[j]}}$
be an analogue of the Ramanujan theta operator for Siegel modular forms. For a given prime
$p$
, we give the weights of elements of mod
$p$
kernel of
${{\Theta }^{[j]}}$
, where the mod
$p$
kernel of
${{\Theta }^{[j]}}$
is the set of all Siegel modular forms
$F$
such that
${{\Theta }^{[j]}}(F)$
is congruent to zero modulo
$p$
. In order to construct examples of the mod
$p$
kernel of
${{\Theta }^{[j]}}$
from any Siegel modular forms, we introduce new operators
${{A}^{(j)}}(M)$
and show the modularity of
$F|{{A}^{\left( j \right)}}\left( M \right)$
when
$F$
is a Siegel modular form. Finally, we give some examples of the mod
$p$
kernel of
${{\Theta }^{[j]}}$
and the filtrations of some of them.
One can characterize Siegel cusp forms among Siegel modular forms by growth properties of their Fourier coefficients. We give a new proof, which works also for more general types of modular forms. Our main tool is to study the behavior of a modular form for
$Z=X+iY$
when
$Y\longrightarrow 0$
.
The two main problems in the theory of the theta correspondence or lifting (between automorphic forms on some adelic orthogonal group and on some adelic symplectic or metaplectic group) are the characterization of kernel and image of this correspondence. Both problems tend to be particularly difficult if the two groups are approximately the same size.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.