Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T02:44:30.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

REFERENCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

David Marker
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Chicago
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] J., Baldwin, The Vaught Conjecture: Do uncountable models count?, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 48 (2007), pp. 79–92.Google Scholar
[2] J., Baldwin, Categoricity, AMS University Lecture Series, AMS, 2009.
[3] J., Baldwin, Amalgamation, absoluteness, and categoricity, Proceedings of the 11th Asian Logic Conference, World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2012, pp. 22–50.
[4] J., Baldwin, S., Friedman, M., Koerwien, and M., Laskowski, Three red herrings around Vaught's Conjecture, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 268 (2016), pp. 3673–3694.Google Scholar
[5] J., Baldwin and P., Larson, Iterated elementary embeddings and the model theory of infinitary languages, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 167 (2016), pp. 309–334.Google Scholar
[6] J., Barwise, The Syntax and Semantics of Infinitary Languages, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 72, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1968, pp. 166–181.
[7] J., Barwise, Back and forth through infinitary logics, Studies in Model Theory (M., Morley, editor), MAA, 1973.
[8] J., Barwise, Admissible Sets and Structures, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.
[9] J., Barwise and S., Feferman, Handbook of Model Theoretic Logics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.
[10] J., Baumgartner, The Hanf number for complete sentences (without GCH), The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 575–578.Google Scholar
[11] M., Bays, M., Gavrilovich, and M., Hils, Some definability results in abstract Kummer theory, International Mathematics Research Notices, vol. 14 (2014), pp. 3975–4000.Google Scholar
[12] M., Bays, B., Hart, T., Hyttinen, M., Kesälä, and J., Kirby, Quasiminimal structures and excellence, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 46 (2014), pp. 155–163.Google Scholar
[13] M., Bays, B., Hart, and A., Pillay, Universal covers of commutative finite Morley rank groups, preprint.
[14] M., Bays and J., Kirby, Excellence and uncountable categoricity of Zilber's exponential fields, preprint. 175
[15] M., Bays and B., Zilber, Covers of multiplicative groups of algebraically closed fields of arbitrary characteristic, Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 43 (2011), pp. 689–702.Google Scholar
[16] J., Burgess, Equivalences generated by families of Borel sets, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 69 (1978), pp. 323–326.Google Scholar
[17] W., Calvert, J., Knight, and J., Millar, Computable trees of Scott rank and computable approximation, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 71 (2006), pp. 283–298.Google Scholar
[18] M., Dickmann, Larger infinitary languages, in [9].
[19] H., Friedman and R., Jensen, A note on admissible ordinals, in [6].
[20] S., Friedman, T., Hyttinen, and M., Koerwien, The nonabsoluteness of model existence in uncountable cardinals for, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 54 (2013), pp. 137–151.Google Scholar
[21] R., Gandy, G., Kreisel, and W. W., Tait, Set existence, Bulletin de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences. Série des Sciences Mathématiques, Astronomiques et Physiques, vol. 8 (1960), pp. 577–582.Google Scholar
[22] S., Gao, On automorphism groups of countable structures, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 63 (1998), pp. 891–896.Google Scholar
[23] S., Gao, Invariant Descriptive Set Theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 293, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009.
[24] V., Harnik and M., Makkai, A tree argument in infinitary model theory, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 67, 1977, pp. 309–314.Google Scholar
[25] L., Harrington, Analytic determinacy and, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 685–693.Google Scholar
[26] M., Hindry and J., Silverman, Diophantine Geometry. An Introduction, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 201, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
[27] P., Hinman, Recursion Theoretic Hierarchies, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1978.
[28] G., Hjorth, Knight's model, its automorphism group, and characterizing the uncountable cardinals, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 2 (2002), pp. 113– 144.Google Scholar
[29] G., Hjorth, A note on counterexamples to the Vaught conjecture, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 48 (2007), pp. 49–51.Google Scholar
[30] T., Jech, Set Theory, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
[31] A., Kanamori, The Higher Infinite, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.
[32] I., Kaplinsky, Infinite Abelian Groups, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 1954.
[33] M., Kaufmann, The quantifier “there exist uncountably many” and some of its relatives, in [9].
[34] A. S., Kechris, Classical Descriptive Set Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995.
[35] A. S., Kechris, D. A., Martin, and R., Solovay, Introduction to Q-theory, Cabal Seminar 79–81, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1019, Springer, Berlin, 1983, pp. 199–282.
[36] H. J., Keisler, Logic with the quantifier “there exist uncountably many”, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (1970), pp. 1–93.Google Scholar
[37] H. J., Keisler, Model Theory of Infinitary Languages, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971.
[38] H. J., Keisler and M., Morley, Elementary extensions of models of set theory, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 6 (1968), pp. 49–65.Google Scholar
[39] J., Kirby, On quasiminimal excellent classes, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 75 (2010), pp. 551–564.Google Scholar
[40] J., Knight, A complete-sentence characterizing, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 42 (1977), pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
[41] J., Knight, Prime and atomic models, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 385–393.Google Scholar
[42] J., Knight, A., Montalbán, and N., Schweber, Computable structures in generic extensions, preprint.
[43] D., Kueker, Back-and-forth arguments in infinitary languages, Infinitary Logic: In Memoriam Carol Karp (D., Kueker, editor), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 72, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1975.
[44] D., Kueker, Countable approximations and Löwenheim–Skolem theorems, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 11 (1977), pp. 57–103.Google Scholar
[45] D., Kueker, Uniform theorems in infinitary logic, Logic Colloquium ‘77, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 96, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, 1978.
[46] K., Kunen, SetTheory: AnIntroduction to Independence Proofs, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 102, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983.
[47] P., Larson, Axiomatizing Scott processes, preprint.
[48] M. C., Laskowski and S., Shelah, On the existence of atomic models, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 58 (1993), pp. 1189–1194.Google Scholar
[49] M., Makkai, An “admissible” generalization of a theorem on countable sets of reals with applications, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 11 (1977), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
[50] M., Makkai, Infinitary Logic, Handbook of Mathematical Logic (J., Barwise, editor), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 90, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1977.
[51] M., Makkai, An example concerning Scott heights, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 46 (1981), pp. 301–318.Google Scholar
[52] J., Malitz, The Hanf number for complete-sentences, in [6].
[53] R., Mansfield, Omitting types: application to descriptive set theory, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 47 (1975), pp. 198– 200.Google Scholar
[54] R., Mansfield and G., Weitkamp, Recursive Aspects of Descriptive Set Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1985.
[55] D., Marker, Basic definability notions for, appendix to [3].
[56] D., Marker, Model Theory: An Introduction, Springer Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, 2002.
[57] D. A., Martin, The axiom of determinateness and reduction principles in the analytical hierarchy, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 74 (1968), pp. 687–689.Google Scholar
[58] D. A., Martin and A. S., Kechris, Infinite games and effective descriptive set theory, Analytic Sets (C. A., Rogers et al., editors), Academic Press, London, 1980.
[59] A., Montalbán, A computability theoretic equivalent to Vaught's conjecture, Advances in Mathematics, vol. 235 (2013), pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
[60] M., Morley, The number of countable models, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 14–18.Google Scholar
[61] Y., Moschovakis, Descriptive Set Theory, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.
[62] M., Nadel, and admissible fragments, in [9].
[63] M., Nadel, More Löwenheim–Skolem results for admissible sets, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 18 (1974), pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
[64] M., Nadel, Scott sentences and admissible sets, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 7 (1974), pp. 267–294.Google Scholar
[65] J.-P., Ressarye, Models with compactness properties relative to an admissible language, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 11 (1977), pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
[66] G., Sacks, Metarecursively enumerable sets and admissible ordinals, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 72 (1966), pp. 59–64.Google Scholar
[67] G., Sacks, On the number of countable models, Southeast Asian Conference on Logic (Singapore, 1981), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 111, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, pp. 185–195.
[68] G., Sacks, Higher Recursion Theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990.
[69] S., Shelah, Categoricity in of sentences in, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 20 (1975), pp. 127–148.Google Scholar
[70] S., Shelah, Classification theory and the number of nonisomorphic models, vol. 92 (1978).
[71] S., Shelah, The number of pairwise non-elementarily-embeddable models, The Journal of Symbolic Logic, vol. 54 (1989), pp. 1431–1455.Google Scholar
[72] S., Shelah, Borel sets with large squares, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 159 (1999), pp. 1–50.Google Scholar
[73] S., Shelah, L., Harrington, and M., Makkai, A proof of Vaught's conjecture for-stable theories, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 49 (1984), pp. 259–280.Google Scholar
[74] J., Silver, Counting the number of equivalence classes of Borel and coanalytic equivalence relations, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 18 (1980), pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
[75] T., Slaman and J., Steel, Definable functions on degrees, Cabal Seminar 81–85, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1333, Springer, Berlin, 1988, pp. 37–55.
[76] I., Souldatos, Characterizing the powerset by a complete (Scott) sentence, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 222 (2013), pp. 131–154.Google Scholar
[77] I., Souldatos, Notes on cardinals that are characterizable by a complete (Scott) sentence, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 55 (2014), pp. 533–551.Google Scholar
[78] J., Steel, On Vaught's conjecture, Cabal Seminar 76–77, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 689, Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp. 193–208.
[79] B., Zilber, Pseudo-exponentiation on algebraically closed fields of characteristic zero, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 132 (2005), pp. 67–95.Google Scholar
[80] B., Zilber, Covers of the multiplicative group of an algebraically closed field of characteristic zero, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 74 (2006), pp. 41–58.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • REFERENCES
  • David Marker, University of Illinois, Chicago
  • Book: Lectures on Infinitary Model Theory
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316855560.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • REFERENCES
  • David Marker, University of Illinois, Chicago
  • Book: Lectures on Infinitary Model Theory
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316855560.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • REFERENCES
  • David Marker, University of Illinois, Chicago
  • Book: Lectures on Infinitary Model Theory
  • Online publication: 05 August 2016
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316855560.016
Available formats
×