Book contents
- The Significance of the New Logic
- The Significance of the New Logic
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Editors’ Introduction
- Willard Van Orman Quine’s Philosophical Development in the 1930s and 1940s
- The Significance of the New Logic
- List of Principles Most Often Referred to in the Text
- Definitions
- Bibliography
- Appendix: The United States and the Revival of Logic
- Notes
- Index
- References
Willard Van Orman Quine’s Philosophical Development in the 1930s and 1940s
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2020
Book contents
- The Significance of the New Logic
- The Significance of the New Logic
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Editors’ Introduction
- Willard Van Orman Quine’s Philosophical Development in the 1930s and 1940s
- The Significance of the New Logic
- List of Principles Most Often Referred to in the Text
- Definitions
- Bibliography
- Appendix: The United States and the Revival of Logic
- Notes
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Significance of the New Logic , pp. xiv - xlviiiPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Barcan, Ruth. 1947. The Identity of Individuals in a Strict Functional Calculus of Second Order. The Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 12, No. 1, 12–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barcan Marcus, Ruth. 1961. Modalities and Intensional Languages. Synthese. Vol. 13, No. 4, 302–322.Google Scholar
Ben-Menahem, Yemima. 2005. Black, White and Gray: Quine on Convention. Synthese. Vol. 146, No. 3, 245–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 2013 (1940–41). Notes on Conversations with Quine, and Tarski, , in Frost-Arnold, (2013).Google Scholar
Chisholm, Roderick. 1947. Review of Os Estados Unidos e o Ressurgimento da Lógica. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 483–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creath, Richard. 1990a. Dear Carnap, Dear Van. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
da Costa, N. C. A. 1997. Review of Second Edition of O Sentido da Nova Lógica. Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 62, No. 2, 688.Google Scholar
Ebbs, Gary. 2011. Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention. Mind. Vol. 120, No. 478, 193–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira da Silva, Vicente. 1940. Elementos de Lógica Matemática. São Paulo: E Realizaçoes.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1892. Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift der Philosophie und Philosophischer Kritik. n. s. Vol. 100, 25–50.Google Scholar
Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2011. Quine’s Evolution from “Carnap’s Disciple” to the Author of “Two Dogmas.” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 1, 291–316.Google Scholar
Frost-Arnold, Greg. 2013. Carnap, Tarski, and Quine at Harvard: Conversations on Logic, Mathematics and Science. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Gödel, Kurt. 1931. Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I. Monatshefte für Mathematik und Physik. Vol. 39, 173–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylton, Peter. 2001. “The Defensible Province of Philosophy”: Quine’s 1934 Lectures on Carnap. In: Floyd, Juliet and Shieh, Sanford (eds.), Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson and Van Orman Quine, Willard. 1947. Steps Toward a Constructive Nominalism. Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 12, No. 4, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. 2015. Meta-Ontology, Naturalism, and the Quine–Barcan Marcus Debate. In: Janssen-Lauret, and Kemp, (2015, pp. 146–167).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. 2016. Committing to an Individual: Ontological Commitment, Reference, and Epistemology. Synthese. Vol. 193, No. 2, 583–604.Google Scholar
Janssen-Lauret, Frederique. 2017. The Quinean Roots of Lewis’s Humeanism. The Monist. Vol. 100, No. 2, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen-Lauret, Frederique and Kemp, Gary (eds.). 2015. Quine and His Place in History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotarbinski, Tadeusz. 1966 (1929). Gnoseology. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Translation of Elementy Teorii poznania, logiki formalnej i metodologii nauk. Wroclaw: Zaklad Narodowy im. Ossolinskich, Wydawnictwo.Google Scholar
Lodge, Ann, Leary, Rolfe A., and Quine, Douglas B.. 2015. Observations on the Contribution of W. V. Quine to Unified Science Theory. In: Janssen-Lauret, and Kemp, (2015, pp. 39–56).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, P. 2005. Harvard 1940–41: Tarski, Carnap and Quine on a Finitistic Language of Mathematics for Science. History and Philosophy of Logic. Vol. 26, 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancosu, P. 2008. Quine and Tarski on Nominalism. In: Zimmerman, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, vol. IV.Google Scholar
Price, H. 2009. Metaphysics after Carnap: The Ghost Who Walks? In: Chalmers, D. J., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford University Press, 320–346.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1934a. A System of Logistic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1934b. Ontological Remarks on the Propositional Calculus. Mind. Vol. 43, 472–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1936. Truth by Convention. In: Lee, O. (ed.), Philosophical Essays for A. N. Whitehead. New York: Longmans.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1939a. Designation and Existence. Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 39, 701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1939b. Relations and Reason. Technology Review. Vol. 41, 299–301, 324–327.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1943. Notes on Existence and Necessity. Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 40, 113–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1947. The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic. Vol. 12, No. 2, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review. Vol. 60, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1953a (1950). Identity, Ostension, and Hypostasis. In: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1953b. Reference and Modality. In: From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1958. El Sentido de la Nueva Lógica, tr. Bunge, Mario. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1963. Set Theory and Its Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1966 (1939). A Logistical Approach to the Ontological Problem. In: The Ways of Paradox. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1976 (1972). Vagaries of Definition. In: The Ways of Paradox. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1976. Whither Physical Objects? Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 29, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1981a (1940). Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1981b (1966). Russell’s Ontological Development. In: Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1981c. Things and Their Place in Theories. In: Theories and Things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1986a. Autobiography. In: Hahn, L. E. and Schilpp, P. A. (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1986b. Reply to Charles Parsons. In: Hahn, L. E. and Schilpp, P. A. (eds.), The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1990b (1932–70). Correspondence with Carnap. In: Creath, (1990a, pp. 107–462).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1991. Two Dogmas in Retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 21, No. 3, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 1996. O Sentido da Nova Lógica. 2nd edn. Universidade Federal do Paraná.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 2003 (1946). Harvard Lectures on Hume. In: Buickerood, J. G. (ed.), Eighteenth-Century Thought. New York: AMS Press, vol. I, pp. 171–254, reprinted in Quine, (2008a).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 2008a. Confessions of a Confirmed Extensionalist, ed. Føllesdal, D. and Quine, D. B.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard. 2008b (1946). Nominalism. In: Zimmerman, D. (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, vol. IV, reprinted in Quine, (2008a, pp. 7–23).Google Scholar
Quine, Willard. 2016. O Sentido da Nova Lógica. 3rd edn. Universidade Federal do Paraná.Google Scholar
Schaffer, J. 2009. On What Grounds What. In: Chalmers, D. J., Manley, D., and Wasserman, R. (eds.), Metametaphysics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tahko, T. 2011. In Defence of Aristotelian Metaphysics. In: Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1933. Pojęcie prawdy w językach nauk dedukcyjnych. Warsaw: Nakładem Towarzystwa Naukowego Warszawskiego.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred. 1935. Der Wahrheitsbegriff in den formalisierten Sprachen, tr. Blaustein, L.. Studia Philosophica. Vol. 1, pp. 261–405.Google Scholar
Uebel, Thomas. 2016. Vienna Circle. In: Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Spring 2016 edn. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2016/entries/vienna-circleGoogle Scholar
Uebel, Thomas. 2017. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. In: Glock, H.-J. and Hyman, J. (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North and Russell, Bertrand. 1964 (1910). Principia Mathematica to *56. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Annalen der Naturphilosophie. Vol. 14, 185–262.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922 (1921). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar