Article contents
Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 June 2015
Abstract
Social Perception and Social Reality (Jussim 2012) reviews the evidence in social psychology and related fields and reaches three conclusions: (1) Although errors, biases, and self-fulfilling prophecies in person perception are real, reliable, and occasionally quite powerful, on average, they tend to be weak, fragile, and fleeting. (2) Perceptions of individuals and groups tend to be at least moderately, and often highly accurate. (3) Conclusions based on the research on error, bias, and self-fulfilling prophecies routinely greatly overstate their power and pervasiveness, and consistently ignore evidence of accuracy, agreement, and rationality in social perception. The weight of the evidence – including some of the most classic research widely interpreted as testifying to the power of biased and self-fulfilling processes – is that interpersonal expectations relate to social reality primarily because they reflect rather than cause social reality. This is the case not only for teacher expectations, but also for social stereotypes, both as perceptions of groups, and as the bases of expectations regarding individuals. The time is long overdue to replace cherry-picked and unjustified stories emphasizing error, bias, the power of self-fulfilling prophecies, and the inaccuracy of stereotypes, with conclusions that more closely correspond to the full range of empirical findings, which includes multiple failed replications of classic expectancy studies, meta-analyses consistently demonstrating small or at best moderate expectancy effects, and high accuracy in social perception.
Keywords
- Type
- Target Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017
References
- 67
- Cited by
Target article
Précis of Social Perception and Social Reality: Why accuracy dominates bias and self-fulfilling prophecy
Related commentaries (16)
A close consideration of effect sizes reviewed by Jussim (2012)
Accurate perceptions do not need complete information to reflect reality
An evolutionary approach to accuracy in social perception
Are stereotypes accurate? A perspective from the cognitive science of concepts
Choosing the right level of analysis: Stereotypes shape social reality via collective action
Intelligence, competitive altruism, and “clever silliness” may underlie bias in academe
More stereotypes, please! The limits of ‘theory of mind’ and the need for further studies on the complexity of real world social interactions
Perceptions versus interpretations, and domains for self-fulfilling prophesies
Realism and constructivism in social perception
Stereotypes violate the postmodern construction of personal autonomy
The expressive rationality of inaccurate perceptions
The social neuroscience of biases in in-and-out-group face processing
There is more to memory than inaccuracy and distortion
Trustworthiness perception at zero acquaintance: Consensus, accuracy, and prejudice
Two faces of social-psychological realism
Why would we expect the mind to work that way? The fitness costs to inaccurate beliefs
Author response
Accuracy, bias, self-fulfilling prophecies, and scientific self-correction