Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T07:43:37.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Body composition of Royal Marine recruits during 32 weeks of military training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

T. Davey
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants PO12 2DL, UK
S. K. Delves
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants PO12 2DL, UK
S. A. Lanham-New
Affiliation:
Nutritional Sciences Division, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, UK
A. J. Allsopp
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants PO12 2DL, UK
J. L. Fallowfield
Affiliation:
Institute of Naval Medicine, Crescent Road, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants PO12 2DL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Royal Marine (RM) recruit training is acknowledged to be one of the most physically arduous military programmes in the world. Young men (16–33 years) undergo 32 weeks of intense training, where physical, mental and professional capabilities are continuously assessed. Body composition may play an important role in the ability to cope with the training load, thus influencing training outcome. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of changes in body composition on training outcomes and is part of an on-going programme of research being undertaken by the Institute of Naval Medicine examining the dietary intake, nutritional status and bone health of RM.

RM recruits commencing training at the Commando Training Centre Royal Marines, Lympstone, Devon, were given an initial study brief, after which 545 recruits from eleven Troops consented to participate. Body mass, height and anthropometric measurements (skinfolds and girths) were taken at the start, middle and end of training. Skinfolds were measured at eight sites (i.e. bicep, tricep, sub-scapular, supraspinale, iliac crest, abdominal, thigh and calf) in accordance with best practice,(Reference Lohman, Roche and Martorell1) and percent body fat was estimated(Reference Durnin and Womersley2).

The changes in anthropometric data during RM training are presented in the table below. The lightest 10% of recruits (<63.8 kg) gained the most body mass (4.1±1.7 kg), while the heaviest 10% (>84.6 kg) decreased in body mass (−0.9±3.7 kg) over the 32 weeks. A recruit had an increased chance of successfully completing training if, at the start of training, he had a body mass of 65 kg or more (compared with lighter recruits odds ratio (OR)=1.3); a BMI between 21–28 kg.m−2 (compared with recruits with a BMI outside this range, OR=1.3); or estimated body fat between 7 and 15% (compared with recruits with body fat outside this range, OR=1.3).

The link between body composition and training outcome highlights the importance of optimising nutritional intake to maximise training success.

The authors would like to thank colleagues at the Commando Training Centre Royal Marines, Lympstone, Devon, for their support and assistance.

References

1.Lohman, TG, Roche, AF, Martorell, R (editors) (1988) Anthropometric Standardisation Reference Manual. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA.Google Scholar
2.Durnin, JVGA & Womersley, J (1974) Body fat assessed from total body density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measurements on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J Nutr 32, 7797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed