Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-22T12:35:51.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Corrigendum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Authors' correction

In the recently published paper by J. Leiro et al. Parasitology119, 267–272, the legend to Fig. 4 should have read as follows:

Fig. 4. Dot–blot hybridization analyses to evaluate sensitivity of the probes C38-DIG (for Microgemma caulleryi) and F9-DIG (for Tetramicra brevifilum). Lanes 1 and 3, genomic DNA of M. caulleryi and T. brevifilum respectively; lanes 2 and 4, C38 and F9 fragments in pBluescript II SK(+). Visualization was with the aid of alkaline-phosphatase-coupled anti-DIG antibody (see text).

Type
Erratum
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press