Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-tr9hg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-13T19:25:57.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Guangdong Province, South China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2018

Nan Liang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China College of Animal Husbandry Engineering, Henan Vocational College of Agriculture, Zhongmu 451450, Henan Province, China
Yayun Wu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China
Mingfei Sun
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong Province, China
Yankai Chang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China
Xuhui Lin
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong Province, China
Linzeng Yu
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong Province, China
Suhui Hu
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China
Xiangqian Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China
Shuangjian Zheng
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China
Zhaohui Cui
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China
Longxian Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China International Joint Research Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases of Henan, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan Province, China

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of Cryptosporidium in dairy cattle in Guangdong Province, South China, 1440 fecal samples were collected from 10 farms and screened for Cryptosporidium with PCR. The overall prevalence of Cryptosporidium was 4.38% (63/1440), and the infection rates in preweaned calves, postweaned calves, heifers and adults were 6.4% (19/297), 6.19% (33/533), 1.48% (4/271) and 2.06% (7/339), respectively. Three Cryptosporidium species, Cryptosporidium andersoni (n = 33), Cryptosporidium bovis (n = 22) and Cryptosporidium ryanae (n = 8) were detected by DNA sequence analysis of the 63 positive samples, and C. andersoni was identified as the most common species on the dairy cattle farms. In preweaned calves, C. bovis was the most prevalent species (9/19, 47.4%). In contrast, C. andersoni was the predominant species (19/33, 57.6%) in postweaned calves and the only species found in heifers and adults. The zoonotic species Cryptosporidium parvum was not detected in this study. Twenty-four C. andersoni isolates were successfully classified into three multilocus sequence typing (MLST) subtypes. MLST subtype A4,A4,A4,A1 was the predominant subtype, and MLST subtype A2,A5,A2,A1, previously found in sheep, was detected in cattle for the first time. A linkage disequilibrium analysis showed that the C. andersoni isolates had a clonal genetic population structure. However, further molecular studies are required to better understand the epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in Guangdong.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Introduction

Cryptosporidium is an important protozoan parasite, mainly causing gastrointestinal disease in humans and animals, including livestock, companion animals and wildlife (Fayer, Reference Fayer2010). Among domestic animals, cattle are recognized as the most common mammalian species to be infected by Cryptosporidium, and preweaned calves are considered an important reservoir for zoonotic Cryptosporidium infections (Xiao and Feng, Reference Xiao and Feng2008; Xiao, Reference Xiao2010; Imre et al., Reference Imre, Lobo, Matos, Popescu, Genchi and Darabus2011). Contamination of cattle manure has led to several food-borne and water-borne outbreaks of human cryptosporidiosis (Blackburn et al., Reference Blackburn, Mazurek, Hlavsa, Park and Tillapaw2006; Baldursson and Karanis, Reference Baldursson and Karanis2011). Cryptosporidium infections frequently result in morbidity, weight loss and delayed growth, and sometimes mortality of young animals.

To date, 37 valid Cryptosporidium species and over 70 genotypes have been described (Ryan et al., Reference Ryan, Fayer and Xiao2014; Kváč et al., Reference Kváč, Havrdová, Hlásková, Daňová, Kanděra, Ježková, Vítovec, Sak, Ortega, Xiao, Modrý, Chelladurai, Prantlová and McEvoy2016; Zahedi et al., Reference Zahedi, Durmic, Gofton, Kueh, Austen, Lawson, Callahan, Jardine and Ryan2017; Čondlová et al., Reference Čondlová, Horčičková, Sak, Květoňová, Hlásková, Konečný, Stanko, McEvoy and Kváč2018; Kváč et al., Reference Kváč, Vlnatá, Ježková, Horčičková, Konečný, Hlásková, McEvoy and Sak2018). Four of them, namely Cryptosporidium parvum, Cryptosporidium bovis, Cryptosporidium andersoni and Cryptosporidium ryanae are the most common species that can infect cattle and cause bovine cryptosporidiosis. Occasionally, Cryptosporidium felis, Cryptosporidium hominis, Cryptosporidium suis, Cryptosporidium scrofarum and C. suis-like have also been detected in cattle (Trout and Santín, Reference Trout, Santín, Fayer and Xiao2008). Many studies conducted in industrialized nations demonstrate that the four common species have age-related distributions. Cryptosporidium parvum is mostly found in preweaned calves and is a significant cause of diarrhoea. Cryptosporidium bovis and C. ryanae usually infect postweaned calves and yearlings, although C. bovis is more prevalent than C. ryanae, and neither is associated with diarrhoea (Santín et al., Reference Santín, Trout and Fayer2008). In contrast, C. andersoni is commonly seen in adult cattle and has been associated with gastritis, reduced milk yield and poor weight gain (Esteban and Anderson, Reference Esteban and Anderson1995).

In China, Cryptosporidium infections have been reported in dairy cattle in Xinjiang, Ningxia, Gansu, Shaanxi, Heilongjiang, Henan, Shandong, Hubei and other provinces (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Li, Zhang, Shu, Zhang, Feng, Xiao and Ling2009; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ma, Zhao, Lu, Wang, Zhang, Jian, Ning and Xiao2011a, Reference Wang, Wang, Sun, Zhang, Jian, Qi, Ning and Xiao2011b; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Yang, Zhang, Cao, Zhang, Hong, Liu and Shen2013, Reference Zhang, Tan, Zhou, Ni, Liu, Yang and Zhu2015; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013, Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Cao, Shen, Yang and Zhang2014; Cui et al., Reference Cui, Wang, Huang, Wang, Zhao and Luo2014; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yue, Qi, Wang, Zhao, Li, Shi, Wang and Zhang2014; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Li, Zhao, Xu, Wu, Wang, Guo, Wang, Feng and Xiao2015; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Wang, Wang and Zhang2015a, Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b; Fan et al., Reference Fan, Wang, Koehler, Hu and Gasser2017), but no information is available on the prevalence or genotypes of Cryptosporidium infections in dairy cattle in Guangdong Province. In this study, we conducted the first molecular epidemiological survey of dairy cattle in Guangdong Province to identify the infection rates and species distribution of Cryptosporidium.

Materials and methods

Study area and specimen collection

Guangdong Province is located at the southern end of mainland China. The annual average temperature is above 20 °C and rainfall is abundant in this region. In this study, 1440 fecal specimens (approximately 20 g each) were collected from eight large-scale dairy cattle farms and two small dairy cattle farms in the cities of Huizhou, Guangzhou, Shenzhen and Qingyuan in Guangdong Province in April 2016 (Table 1). The collected specimens represented 10–15% of the total cattle on each farm. A fresh fecal specimen was collected from each animal using a sterile disposable latex glove immediately after its defecation onto the ground, and the sample was then placed individually into a disposable plastic bag. The cattle were divided into age groups: preweaned calves (<2 months old), postweaned calves (2–6 months old), heifers (7 months to 2 years old) and adult cattle (>2 years old). All the specimens were stored in 2.5% potassium dichromate at 4 °C before DNA extraction.

Table 1. Infection rates and distribution of Cryptosporidium species in dairy cattle of different collection sites and age groups in Guangdong Province

DNA extraction and PCR amplification

All fecal specimens collected were washed three times with distilled water by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 10 min at room temperature. The genomic DNA was extracted from 200 mg of each specimen using the E.Z.N.A.® Stool DNA Kit (Omega Biotek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The eluted DNA was stored at −20 °C until PCR analysis.

All DNA samples were screened for Cryptosporidium using nested PCR amplification of an approximate 830-bp fragment of the small subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) gene, as previously described (Alves et al., Reference Alves, Xiao, Sulaiman, Lal, Matos and Antunes2003). Positive and negative controls were included in each PCR analysis. Then, the samples positive for C. andersoni at the SSU rRNA locus were subtyped by amplifying the four minisatellite/microsatellite targets including MS1 (coding for hypothetical protein), MS2 (coding for 90 kDa heat shock protein), MS3 (coding for hypothetical protein) and MS16 (coding for leucine-rich repeat family protein) according to the previously described nested PCR (polymerase chain reaction) protocols (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Yang, Ryan, Zhang, Kvác, Koudela, Modrý, Li, Fayer and Xiao2011; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013). KOD-Plus amplification enzyme (Toyobo Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) was used for PCR amplification. The secondary PCR products were examined by agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized after GelRed™ staining (Biotium Inc., Hayward, CA, USA).

DNA sequence analysis

Positive secondary PCR products were sequenced on an ABI Prism™ 3730 XL DNA Analyzer using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). Sequence accuracy was confirmed with bi-directional sequencing and by sequencing a new PCR product if necessary. The sequences were identified by alignment with reference sequences downloaded from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using the ClustalX2.13. The C. andersoni subtypes were named according to the repeat characteristics of minisatellite repeats in four genetic loci by Feng et al. (Reference Feng, Yang, Ryan, Zhang, Kvác, Koudela, Modrý, Li, Fayer and Xiao2011).

Statistical analysis

The Cryptosporidium infection rates were evaluated using Regression Analysis in Statistic Package for Social Science (SPSS) for Windows with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Probability level (P) of <0.05 were considered as statistically significant. The linkage disequilibrium (LD) across all four loci was assessed with the standardized index of association (I SA) proposed by Haubold and Hudson (Reference Haubold and Hudson2000). LD was tested with LIAN version 3.7 (http://guanine.evolbio.mpg.de/cgi-bin/lian/lian.cgi.pl) using a parametric method for the four microsatellite/minisatellite loci.

Results

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium

Eight of the 10 farms tested were positive for Cryptosporidium, with infection rates of 1.34–27.5% (P < 0.01; Table 1). Among the Cryptosporidium-positive farms, farm HZ-3 had the highest prevalence and farms GZ-4 and QY-1 had no Cryptosporidium infections. The infection rates of the different age groups were 6.4% (95% CI 3.60–9.20) in preweaned calves, 6.19% (95% CI 4.41–8.24) in postweaned calves, 1.48% (95% CI 0.03–2.92) in heifers and 2.06% (95% CI 0.54–3.59) in adult cattle (P < 0.01, Table 1).

Distribution of Cryptosporidium species and subtypes

Sequence analysis of the 18S rRNA gene fragment revealed the presence of three Cryptosporidium species: C. andersoni (n = 33) on seven farms, C. bovis (n = 22) on five farms and C. ryanae (n = 8) on four farms (Table 1). Except for farm SZ-1, C. andersoni was detected on all the Cryptosporidium-positive farms and was the only species found on three farms.

Cryptosporidium andersoni was found in all age groups of dairy cattle, responsible for 52.4% (33/63) of all Cryptosporidium infections in this study. The prevalence of C. andersoni in preweaned calves, postweaned calves, heifers and adult cattle was 1.01% (95% CI 0–2.15), 3.56% (95% CI 1.99–5.14), 1.48% (95% CI 0.03–2.92) and 2.06% (95% CI 0.54–3.59), respectively. In contrast, C. bovis and C. ryanae were only found in dairy calves, with infection rates of 2.65% (95% CI 1.56–3.75) and 0.96% (95% CI 0.30–1.63), respectively (Table 1).

At the four microsatellite/minisatellite loci (MS1, MS2, MS3 and MS16), 24, 25, 24 and 25 DNA preparations were sequenced successfully, respectively, and three, two, two and one haplotypes were identified, respectively. In total, 24 of 33 C. andersoni isolates were successfully subtyped at all four loci, and three C. andersoni MLST subtypes were identified. Of these, MLST subtype A4,A4,A4,A1 was most prevalent (87.5%, 21/24) in the dairy cattle, appearing on all C. andersoni-positive farms, demonstrating an extensive distribution in the investigated area. However, the other two MLST subtypes, A2,A5,A2,A1 (n = 1) and A1,A4,A4,A1 (n = 2), were only detected on farms GZ-2 and GZ-3, respectively. MLST subtype A4,A4,A4,A1 was predominant in all age groups of dairy cattle and was the only subtype detected in dairy calves. MLST subtypes A2,A5,A2,A1 and A1,A4,A4,A1 were only found in heifers and adult cattle, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. The distribution of MLST subtypes of Cryptosporidium andersoni in dairy cattle of different collection sites and age groups in Guangdong Province

a Subtyped no. indicates the number of C. andersoni isolates subtyped successfully at all the four loci (MS1, MS2, MS3 and MS16) with PCR; amplified no. indicates the number of C. andersoni isolates analysed with PCR at all the four loci (MS1, MS2, MS3 and MS16).

b Haplotypes are arranged in the order of the gene loci amplified: MS1, MS2, MS3 and MS16.

LD analysis of C. andersoni

The 24 C. andersoni isolates successfully subtyped at all the four loci were included in the LD analysis. The standardized index of association (I SA = 0.4109) was >0 and the pairwise variance (V D = 0.7431) was greater than the 95% confidence limit (L = 0.4527), indicating the presence of LD and the clonal population structure of C. andersoni in Guangdong Province.

Discussion

The overall Cryptosporidium prevalence in this study was 4.38%, which is lower than most rates reported in dairy cattle in Heilongjiang (17.33%, 257/1483), Anhui (14.9%, 52/350), Shanghai (12.5%, 55/440), Jiangsu (20.7%, 251/1215), Henan (13.0%, 276/2116), Xinjiang (16.0%, 82/514) and Shaanxi (5.24%, 122/2329) (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Li, Zhang, Shu, Zhang, Feng, Xiao and Ling2009; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ma, Zhao, Lu, Wang, Zhang, Jian, Ning and Xiao2011a, Reference Wang, Wang, Sun, Zhang, Jian, Qi, Ning and Xiao2011b; Chen and Huang, Reference Chen and Huang2012; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Yang, Zhang, Cao, Zhang, Hong, Liu and Shen2013; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Cao, Shen, Yang and Zhang2014; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Wang, Wang and Zhang2015a, Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Tan, Zhou, Ni, Liu, Yang and Zhu2015), but higher than that in Ningxia (3.76%, 115/3054) (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yue, Qi, Wang, Zhao, Li, Shi, Wang and Zhang2014; Cui et al., Reference Cui, Wang, Huang, Wang, Zhao and Luo2014; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b). The infection rate of 6.4% in preweaned calves was lower than all previously reported studies, in which the prevalence was 10.22–47.68% (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wang, Sun, Zhang, Jian, Qi, Ning and Xiao2011b; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Yang, Zhang, Cao, Zhang, Hong, Liu and Shen2013; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yue, Qi, Wang, Zhao, Li, Shi, Wang and Zhang2014; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Wang, Wang and Zhang2015a, Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b; Fan et al., Reference Fan, Wang, Koehler, Hu and Gasser2017). However, the infection rate in postweaned calves (6.19%) was higher than that in Heilongjiang (5.5%) (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Li, Zhang, Shu, Zhang, Feng, Xiao and Ling2009), but lower than that in Henan (11.3%) and Xinjiang (16.2%) (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ma, Zhao, Lu, Wang, Zhang, Jian, Ning and Xiao2011a; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Wang, Wang and Zhang2015a). Many factors, including specimen size, diagnostic technique, management system, season and geographic area, may be responsible for the differences in the prevalence of Cryptosporidium observed in different areas of China. These results were also consistent with previous studies, which showed that the prevalence of Cryptosporidium was higher in preweaned calves than in any other age group (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ma, Zhao, Lu, Wang, Zhang, Jian, Ning and Xiao2011a, Reference Wang, Wang, Sun, Zhang, Jian, Qi, Ning and Xiao2011b; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yue, Qi, Wang, Zhao, Li, Shi, Wang and Zhang2014; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Tan, Zhou, Ni, Liu, Yang and Zhu2015) (Table 1).

Cryptosporidium andersoni is the predominant species in postweaned calves and adult cattle, which had been confirmed in China, Mongolia, Egypt and some European countries (Burenbaatar et al., Reference Burenbaatar, Bakheit, Plutzer, Suzuki, Igarashi, Ongerth and Karanis2008; Ondráčková et al., Reference Ondráčková, Kváč, Sak, Květoňová and Rost2009; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ma, Zhao, Lu, Wang, Zhang, Jian, Ning and Xiao2011a; Amer et al., Reference Amer, Zidan, Adamu, Ye, Roellig, Xiao and Feng2013; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013; Ma et al., Reference Ma, Li, Zhao, Xu, Wu, Wang, Guo, Wang, Feng and Xiao2015; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Wang, Wang and Zhang2015a, Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b). In contrast, in other countries, C. bovis was considered the predominant species in postweaned calves (Enemark et al., Reference Enemark, Ahrens, Lowery, Thamsborg and Enemark2002; Feng et al., Reference Feng, Ortega, He, Das, Xu, Zhang, Fayer, Gatei, Cama and Xiao2007). Cryptosporidium andersoni was the only species detected in heifers and adult cattle in this study, which was identical to previous studies conducted in Heilongjiang, Shaanxi and Henan Provinces (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Wang, Li, Zhang, Shu, Zhang, Feng, Xiao and Ling2009; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Ma, Zhao, Lu, Wang, Zhang, Jian, Ning and Xiao2011a; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013). The potential zoonotic transmission of C. andersoni is unknown, but the species has been isolated from humans with diarrhoea (Leoni et al., Reference Leoni, Amar, Nichols, Pedraza-Diaz and McLauchlin2006; Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Ren, Yuan, Liu, Zhao, Liu, Chu, Pan, Cao, Lin and Shen2014).

Several studies have reported that zoonotic C. parvum is responsible for the majority of Cryptosporidium infections in preweaned calves (Santín et al., Reference Santín, Trout, Xiao, Zhou, Greiner and Fayer2004; Fayer et al., Reference Fayer, Santín, Trout and Greiner2006; Santín et al., Reference Santín, Trout and Fayer2008; Trout and Santín, Reference Trout, Santín, Fayer and Xiao2008; Amer et al., Reference Amer, Zidan, Adamu, Ye, Roellig, Xiao and Feng2013). However, other studies have shown that C. bovis is the species most commonly found in preweaned calves (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Ortega, He, Das, Xu, Zhang, Fayer, Gatei, Cama and Xiao2007; Silverlas et al., Reference Silverlas, Naslund, Bjorkman and Mattsson2010; Rieux et al., Reference Rieux, Chartier, Pors and Paraud2013). In the present study, C. bovis, rather than C. parvum, was the most abundant species in preweaned calves, which was in concordance with the results from Shaanxi, Heilongjiang, Henan and Hubei Provinces, as well as Shanghai (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Wang, Sun, Zhang, Jian, Qi, Ning and Xiao2011b; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Yang, Zhang, Cao, Zhang, Hong, Liu and Shen2013; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b; Fan et al., Reference Fan, Wang, Koehler, Hu and Gasser2017), but differed from Xinjiang and Ningxia (Cui et al., Reference Cui, Wang, Huang, Wang, Zhao and Luo2014; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Yue, Qi, Wang, Zhao, Li, Shi, Wang and Zhang2014; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Wang, Wang and Zhang2015a, Reference Qi, Fang, Wang, Zhang, Wang, Du, Guo, Jia, Yao, Liu and Zhao2015b).

However, C. parvum was not detected in the present study, which was also reported in early studies from China and abroad (Maikai et al., Reference Maikai, Umoh, Kwaga, Lawal, Maikai, Cama and Xiao2011; Feng et al., Reference Feng, Karna, Dearen, Singh, Adhikari, Shrestha and Xiao2012; Murakoshi et al., Reference Murakoshi, Xiao, Matsubara, Sato, Kato, Sasaki, Fukuda, Tada and Nakai2012; Nguyen et al., Reference Nguyen, Fukuda, Tada, Sato, Duong, Nguyen and Nakai2012; Abeywardena et al., Reference Abeywardena, Jex, Koehler, Rajapakse, Udayawarna, Haydon, Stevens and Gasser2014; Wegayehu et al., Reference Wegayehu, Karim, Anberber, Adamu, Erko, Zhang and Tilahun2016; Fan et al., Reference Fan, Wang, Koehler, Hu and Gasser2017). The reason for the absence of C. parvum remains unclear. The failure to detect C. parvum in preweaned calves in Guangdong Province suggests that the dairy cattle in this province have low zoonotic potential for the transmission of Cryptosporidium to humans. However, larger sample of dairy cattle from this province should be analysed by PCR to confirm the findings of the present study.

To date, 21 MLST subtypes have been identified in C. andersoni isolates from animals, 17 of which occur in cattle (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Yang, Ryan, Zhang, Kvác, Koudela, Modrý, Li, Fayer and Xiao2011; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Jian, Zhang, Ning, Liu, Zhao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Lv, Zhao and Xiao2012; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Jian, Ning and Zhang2016). In the present study, the MLST subtype A4,A4,A4,A1 was the most prevalent subtype in dairy cattle in Guangdong, which was in agreement with the finding in Heilongjiang and other areas of China (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Jian, Zhang, Ning, Liu, Zhao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Lv, Zhao and Xiao2012; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Cao, Shen, Yang and Zhang2014), whereas subtype A2,A4,A2,A1 was predominant in dairy cattle in Xinjiang and A1,A4,A4,A1 in Shaanxi (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Jian, Ning and Zhang2016). These differences may be related to the number of samples examined and geographic segregation. MLST subtype A2,A5,A2,A1 was found for the first time in cattle in this study, which was also identified in sheep, and further suggested that C. andersoni might circulate between cattle and sheep (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Jian, Zhang, Ning, Liu, Zhao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Lv, Zhao and Xiao2012).

In this study, the samples successfully amplified at all four loci were included in the LD analysis, which showed that C. andersoni isolated from dairy cattle in Guangdong Province had a clonal genetic population structure. The result differed from previous findings that C. andersoni population in cattle from Xinjiang and other geographical regions of China had an epidemic genetic structure (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Jian, Zhang, Ning, Liu, Zhao, Feng, Qi, Wang, Lv, Zhao and Xiao2012; Qi et al., Reference Qi, Wang, Jing, Jian, Ning and Zhang2016). However, it was consistent with C. andersoni isolates in cattle from Shaanxi and Heilongjing Provinces (Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Ren, Gao, Bian, Hu, Cong, Lin, Wang, Qi, Qi, Zhu and Zhang2013; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Wang, Zhang, Liu, Cao, Shen, Yang and Zhang2014). A clonal genetic population structure indicated that the prevalence of C. andersoni in cattle in Guangdong Province was not attributable to the introduction of cattle.

In conclusion, Cryptosporidium is common in dairy cattle in Guangdong province. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of C. andersoni, C. bovis and C. ryanae infection, with C. andersoni as the most prevalent species. Three MLST subtypes of C. andersoni were identified, and subtype A2,A5,A2,A1 was found for the first time in cattle. Cryptosporidium andersoni in dairy cattle in Guangdong presented a clonal genetic structure. The findings in this study provided valuable basic data for developing strategies and measures to control Cryptosporidium infection in dairy cattle and evaluate the risk of Cryptosporidium infection to humans.

Financial support

This study was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31330079, 31672548), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017|YFD0501305, 2016YFD0500707) and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province (162300410129).

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

This study was performed in accordance with the Chinese Laboratory Animal Administration Act of 1988. Before the experiments, the protocol of the study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Henan Agricultural University. All the fecal samples were collected from animals with the permission of the farm owners.

References

Abeywardena, H, Jex, AR, Koehler, AV, Rajapakse, RP, Udayawarna, K, Haydon, SR, Stevens, MA and Gasser, RB (2014) First molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia from bovines (Bos taurus and Bubalus bubalis) in Sri Lanka: unexpected absence of C. parvum from pre-weaned calves. Parasites & Vectors 7, 75.Google Scholar
Alves, M, Xiao, L, Sulaiman, I, Lal, AA, Matos, O and Antunes, F (2003) Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle, and zoo ruminants in Portugal. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 41, 27442747.Google Scholar
Amer, S, Zidan, S, Adamu, H, Ye, J, Roellig, D, Xiao, L and Feng, Y (2013) Prevalence and characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle in Nile River delta Provinces, Egypt. Experimental Parasitology 135, 518523.Google Scholar
Baldursson, S and Karanis, P (2011) Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: review of worldwide outbreaks – an update 2004–2010. Water Research 45, 66036614.Google Scholar
Blackburn, BG, Mazurek, JM, Hlavsa, M, Park, J and Tillapaw, M (2006) Cryptosporidiosis associated with ozonated apple cider. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, 684686.Google Scholar
Burenbaatar, B, Bakheit, M, Plutzer, J, Suzuki, N, Igarashi, I, Ongerth, J and Karanis, P (2008) Prevalence and genotyping of Cryptosporidium species from animals in Mongolia. Parasitology Research 102, 901905.Google Scholar
Chen, F and Huang, KH (2012) Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy cattle from farms in China. Journal of Veterinary Science 13, 1522.Google Scholar
Čondlová, Š, Horčičková, M, Sak, B, Květoňová, D, Hlásková, L, Konečný, R, Stanko, M, McEvoy, J and Kváč, M (2018) Cryptosporidium apodemi sp. n. and Cryptosporidium ditrichi sp. n. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in Apodemus spp. European Journal of Protistology 63, 112.Google Scholar
Cui, Z, Wang, R, Huang, J, Wang, H, Zhao, J and Luo, N (2014) Cryptosporidiosis caused by Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA15G1 at a dairy farm in northwestern China. Parasites & Vectors 7, 14.Google Scholar
Enemark, HL, Ahrens, P, Lowery, CJ, Thamsborg, SM and Enemark, JM (2002) Cryptosporidium andersoni from a Danish cattle herd: identification and preliminary characterisation. Veterinary Parasitology 107, 3749.Google Scholar
Esteban, E and Anderson, BC (1995) Cryptosporidium muris: prevalence, persistency, and detrimental effect on milk production in a drylot dairy. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 10681072.Google Scholar
Fan, Y, Wang, T, Koehler, AV, Hu, M and Gasser, RB (2017) Molecular investigation of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in pre- and post-weaned calves in Hubei Province, China. Parasites & Vectors 10, 519.Google Scholar
Fayer, R (2010) Taxonomy and species delimitation in Cryptosporidium. Experimental Parasitology 124, 9097.Google Scholar
Fayer, R, Santín, M, Trout, JM and Greiner, E (2006) Prevalence of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium found in 1–2-year-old dairy cattle in the eastern United States. Veterinary Parasitology 135, 105112.Google Scholar
Feng, Y, Ortega, Y, He, G, Das, P, Xu, M, Zhang, X, Fayer, R, Gatei, W, Cama, V and Xiao, L (2007) Wide geographic distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis and the deer-like genotype in bovines. Veterinary Parasitology 144, 19.Google Scholar
Feng, Y, Yang, W, Ryan, U, Zhang, L, Kvác, M, Koudela, B, Modrý, D, Li, N, Fayer, R and Xiao, L (2011) Development of a multilocus sequence tool for typing Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium andersoni. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 3441.Google Scholar
Feng, Y, Karna, SR, Dearen, TK, Singh, DK, Adhikari, LN, Shrestha, A and Xiao, L (2012) Common occurrence of a unique Cryptosporidium ryanae variant in zebu cattle and water buffaloes in the buffer zone of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Veterinary Parasitology 185, 309314.Google Scholar
Haubold, B and Hudson, RR (2000) LIAN 3.0: detecting linkage disequilibrium in multilocus data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 16, 847848.Google Scholar
Huang, J, Yue, D, Qi, M, Wang, R, Zhao, J, Li, J, Shi, K, Wang, M and Zhang, L (2014) Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in dairy cattle in Ningxia, northwestern China. BMC Veterinary Research 10, 292.Google Scholar
Imre, K, Lobo, LM, Matos, O, Popescu, C, Genchi, C and Darabus, G (2011) Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium isolates from pre-weaned calves in Romania: is there an actual risk of zoonotic infections? Veterinary Parasitology 181, 321324.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y, Ren, J, Yuan, Z, Liu, A, Zhao, H, Liu, H, Chu, L, Pan, W, Cao, J, Lin, Y and Shen, Y (2014) Cryptosporidium andersoni as a novel predominant Cryptosporidium species in outpatients with diarrhea in JiangSu Province, China. BMC Infectious Diseases 14, 555.Google Scholar
Kváč, M, Havrdová, N, Hlásková, L, Daňová, T, Kanděra, J, Ježková, J, Vítovec, J, Sak, B, Ortega, Y, Xiao, L, Modrý, D, Chelladurai, JR, Prantlová, V and McEvoy, J (2016) Cryptosporidium proliferans n. sp. (Apicomplexa: cryptosporidiidae): molecular and biological evidence of cryptic species within gastric Cryptosporidium of mammals. PLoS ONE 11, e0147090.Google Scholar
Kváč, M, Vlnatá, G, Ježková, J, Horčičková, M, Konečný, R, Hlásková, L, McEvoy, J and Sak, B (2018) Cryptosporidium occultus sp. n. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in rats. European Journal of Protistology 63, 96104.Google Scholar
Leoni, F, Amar, C, Nichols, G, Pedraza-Diaz, S and McLauchlin, J (2006) Genetic analysis of Cryptosporidium from 2414 humans with diarrhoea in England between 1985 and 2000. Journal of Medical Microbiology 55, 703707.Google Scholar
Liu, A, Wang, R, Li, Y, Zhang, L, Shu, J, Zhang, W, Feng, Y, Xiao, L and Ling, H (2009) Prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. In dairy cattle in Heilongjiang Province, China. Parasitology Research 105, 797802.Google Scholar
Ma, J, Li, P, Zhao, X, Xu, H, Wu, W, Wang, Y, Guo, Y, Wang, L, Feng, Y and Xiao, L (2015) Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle, beef cattle and water buffaloes in China. Veterinary Parasitology 209, 220–207.Google Scholar
Maikai, BV, Umoh, JU, Kwaga, JK, Lawal, IA, Maikai, VA, Cama, V and Xiao, L (2011) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in native breeds of cattle in Kaduna State, Nigeria. Veterinary Parasitology 178, 241245.Google Scholar
Murakoshi, F, Xiao, L, Matsubara, R, Sato, R, Kato, Y, Sasaki, T, Fukuda, Y, Tada, C and Nakai, Y (2012) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in grazing beef cattle in Japan. Veterinary Parasitology 187, 123128.Google Scholar
Nguyen, ST, Fukuda, Y, Tada, C, Sato, R, Duong, B, Nguyen, DT and Nakai, Y (2012) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium in native beef calves in central Vietnam. Parasitology Research 111, 18171820.Google Scholar
Ondráčková, Z, Kváč, M, Sak, B, Květoňová, D and Rost, M (2009) Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. In dairy cattle in south Bohemia, the Czech Republic. Veterinary Parasitology 165, 141144.Google Scholar
Qi, M, Wang, H, Jing, B, Wang, D, Wang, R and Zhang, L (2015 a) Occurrence and molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves in Xinjiang, northwestern China. Veterinary Parasitology 212, 404.Google Scholar
Qi, M, Wang, R, Jing, B, Jian, F, Ning, C and Zhang, L (2016) Prevalence and multilocus genotyping of Cryptosporidium andersoni in dairy cattle and He cattle in Xinjiang, China. Infection Genetics and Evolution 44, 313317.Google Scholar
Qi, MZ, Fang, YQ, Wang, XT, Zhang, LX, Wang, RJ, Du, SZ, Guo, YZ, Jia, YQ, Yao, L, Liu, QD and Zhao, GH (2015 b) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned calves in Shaanxi Province, north-western China. Journal of Medical Microbiology 64, 111116.Google Scholar
Rieux, A, Chartier, C, Pors, I and Paraud, C (2013) Dynamics of excretion and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates in pre-weaned French beef calves. Veterinary Parasitology 195, 169172.Google Scholar
Ryan, U, Fayer, R and Xiao, L (2014) Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: current understanding and research needs. Parasitology 141, 16671685.Google Scholar
Santín, M, Trout, JM, Xiao, L, Zhou, L, Greiner, E and Fayer, R (2004) Prevalence and age-related variation of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in dairy calves. Veterinary Parasitology 122, 103117.Google Scholar
Santín, M, Trout, JM and Fayer, R (2008) A longitudinal study of cryptosporidiosis in dairy cattle from birth to 2 years of age. Veterinary Parasitology 155, 1523.Google Scholar
Silverlas, C, Naslund, K, Bjorkman, C and Mattsson, JG (2010) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from Swedish dairy cattle in relation to age, diarrhoea and region. Veterinary Parasitology 169, 289295.Google Scholar
Trout, JM and Santín, M (2008) Livestock. In Fayer, R and Xiao, L (eds), Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis. 2nd Edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press and IWA Publishing, pp. 451483.Google Scholar
Wang, R, Ma, G, Zhao, J, Lu, Q, Wang, H, Zhang, L, Jian, F, Ning, C and Xiao, L (2011 a) Cryptosporidium andersoni is the predominant species in post-weaned and adult dairy cattle in China. Parasitology International 60, 14.Google Scholar
Wang, R, Wang, H, Sun, Y, Zhang, L, Jian, F, Qi, M, Ning, C and Xiao, L (2011 b) Characteristics of Cryptosporidium transmission in preweaned dairy cattle in Henan, China. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49, 10771082.Google Scholar
Wang, R, Jian, F, Zhang, L, Ning, C, Liu, A, Zhao, J, Feng, Y, Qi, M, Wang, H, Lv, C, Zhao, G and Xiao, L (2012) Multilocus sequence subtyping and genetic structure of Cryptosporidium muris and Cryptosporidium andersoni. PLoS ONE 7, e43782.Google Scholar
Wegayehu, T, Karim, MR, Anberber, M, Adamu, H, Erko, B, Zhang, L and Tilahun, G (2016) Prevalence and genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium species in dairy calves in Central Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 11, e0154647.Google Scholar
Xiao, L (2010) Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Experimental Parasitology 124, 8089.Google Scholar
Xiao, L and Feng, Y (2008) Zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 52, 309323.Google Scholar
Zahedi, A, Durmic, Z, Gofton, AW, Kueh, S, Austen, J, Lawson, M, Callahan, L, Jardine, J and Ryan, U (2017) Cryptosporidium homai n.sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiiae) from the guinea pig (Cavia porcellus). Veterinary Parasitology 245, 92101.Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Wang, R, Yang, F, Zhang, L, Cao, J, Zhang, X, Hong, L, Liu, A and Shen, Y (2013) Distribution and genetic characterizations of Cryptosporidium spp. in pre-weaned dairy calves in northeastern China's Heilongjiang Province. PLoS ONE 8, e54857.Google Scholar
Zhang, XX, Tan, QD, Zhou, DH, Ni, XT, Liu, GX, Yang, YC and Zhu, XQ (2015) Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. In dairy cattle, northwest China. Parasitology Research 114, 27812787.Google Scholar
Zhao, GH, Ren, WX, Gao, M, Bian, QQ, Hu, B, Cong, MM, Lin, Q, Wang, RJ, Qi, M, Qi, MZ, Zhu, XQ and Zhang, LX (2013) Genotyping Cryptosporidium andersoni in cattle in Shaanxi Province, Northwestern China. PLoS ONE 8, e60112.Google Scholar
Zhao, W, Wang, R, Zhang, W, Liu, A, Cao, J, Shen, Y, Yang, F and Zhang, L (2014) MLST subtypes and population genetic structure of Cryptosporidium andersoni from dairy cattle and beef cattle in northeastern China's Heilongjiang Province. PLoS ONE 9, e102006.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Infection rates and distribution of Cryptosporidium species in dairy cattle of different collection sites and age groups in Guangdong Province

Figure 1

Table 2. The distribution of MLST subtypes of Cryptosporidium andersoni in dairy cattle of different collection sites and age groups in Guangdong Province