Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T17:06:26.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Trait variations for seed physical characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) from the Western Himalayas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2023

Humara Fayaz
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics and Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura Campus, Sopore, India
Aijaz A. Wani
Affiliation:
Cytogenetics and Reproductive Biology Laboratory, Department of Botany, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India
Asma Hamid Mir
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura Campus, Sopore, India
Raheel Shafeeq Khan
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura Campus, Sopore, India
Farkhanda Jan
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura Campus, Sopore, India
Mohammad Yasin
Affiliation:
Rafi Amhad Kidwai (RAK) College of Agriculture, Rajmata Vijayaraje Schindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (RVSKV), Sehore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Mohd. Ashraf Bhat
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura Campus, Sopore, India
Reyazul Rouf Mir*
Affiliation:
Division of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, SKUAST-Kashmir, Wadura Campus, Sopore, India
*
Author for correspondence: Reyazul Rouf Mir, E-mail: imrouf2006@gmail.com; rrmir@skuastkashmir.ac.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is one of the most important grain legumes after common bean. In the present study, a total of 35 chickpea genotypes including desi and Kabuli types of cultivated chickpea (C. arietinum) were evaluated for seed physical characteristics that are very important for seed storage, processing and determining seed quality traits. Therefore, it has become imperative to study the seed physical characteristics of chickpea during the present study. The analysis of data revealed that substantial variation is present among the genotypes under study with respect to seed physical characteristics such as seed size, seed volume, seed density, hydration capacity, hydration index, swelling capacity and swelling index. These traits are considered important to determine the seed rate at the time of sowing of the crop, cooking quality, storage and processing and thereby have a direct bearing on the economics of chickpea consumption. Our results indicated that the desi, Kabuli and pea-shaped genotypes differ significantly in seed physical characteristics with overall superior trait performance of the Kabuli type compared to other seed types, making them superior with respect to consumer/market demands.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of NIAB

Introduction

Chickpea is considered a very important nutritious crop for people in the Western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir. Therefore, efforts have been made by us to procure large collections of chickpea germplasm from various national/international institutions followed by their morpho-molecular characterization and gene mapping for nutritional traits, flowering, seed coat colour, biotic and abiotic stresses (Fayaz et al., Reference Fayaz, Rather, Wani, Tyagi, Pandey and Mir2019, Reference Fayaz, Mir, Tyagi, Wani, Jan, Yasin, Iqbal, Mondal, Khan and Mir2021, Reference Fayaz, Tyagi, Wani, Pandey, Akhtar, Bhat, Chitikineni, Varshney, Thudi, Kumar and Mir2022; Ortega et al., Reference Ortega, Hecht, Freeman, Rubio, Carrasquilla-Garcia and Mir2019; Sivasakthi et al., Reference Sivasakthi, Marques, Kalungwana, Carrasquilla-Garcia, Chang, Bergmann and Penmetsa2019; Mir et al., Reference Mir, Bhat, Dar, Sofi, Bhat and Mir2021). In the present study, efforts were made to characterize a set of genotypes for seed physical characteristics for the first time in the Kashmir Valley. Seed physical characteristics are considered important for storage, processing, milling and marketing (Ramasamy and Harte, Reference Ramasamy and Harte2009; Sastry et al., Reference Sastry, Upadhyaya and Srinivas2019). The quality of chickpea is essentially determined by several factors including physico-chemical characteristics and cooking quality (Patane et al., Reference Patane, Iacoponi and Raccuia2004). A longer cooking time consumes more fuel and causes loss of nutrients thus limiting the use of dry grain as a food in developing countries (Barampama and Simard, Reference Barampama and Simard1995). The acceptability characteristics, which are strongly associated with the physico-chemical properties of the product, have not received enough attention in breeding programmes (Reyes-Moreno et al., Reference Reyes-Moreno, Okamura-Esparza, Armienta-Rodelo, Gomez-Garza and Milán-Carrillo2000). A strong correlation was observed between water absorbed and texture of the cooked cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) at room temperature (Sefa-Dedeh and Stanley, Reference Sefa-Dedeh and Stanley1979), the hydration coefficient and cooking ability index in faba bean (Vicia faba) (Youssef et al., Reference Youssef, Bushuk, Murray, Zillman and Shehata1982) and swelling capacity and hydration capacity related to cooking time in chickpea (Williams et al., Reference Williams, Nakoul and Singh1983). The weight, volume and density of seeds are important qualitative traits influencing cooking quality (Waldia, Reference Waldia1996; Mehla et al., Reference Mehla, Waldia and Dahiya2001) suggesting that a selection among populations on this basis would lead to a useful reduction in cooking time. Hence, it becomes essential to study the seed qualitative/physical traits of chickpea in the present study, which in turn determines the cooking properties.

Experimental details

The experimental assessment of variability for seed qualitative traits in a set of 35 chickpea genotypes (for details see online Supplementary Table S1) was conducted at the Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir (SKUAST-K), Jammu and Kashmir, India during 2017. The 35 genotypes included 17 desi green genotypes, seven desi brown, two desi black, three pea-shaped genotypes and six kabuli genotypes (Fig. 1). The qualitative/physical traits including seed weight, seed volume, seed density, hydration capacity, hydration index, swelling capacity and swelling index of the seeds of these genotypes were recorded following Khattak et al. (Reference Khattak, Khattak, Mahmood, Bibi and Ihsanullah2006). Three random samples of 100 seeds from each cultivar per replication were weighed. Seed volume was determined by the water displacement method. Seed density was calculated as seed weight (g) divided by seed volume (ml). Hydration capacity was recorded as gain in weight (g) after overnight soaking in distilled water. The hydration index was calculated as the hydration capacity divided by the original seed weight (g). The swelling capacity was determined as gain in volume (ml) after overnight soaking in water, and the swelling index was calculated as the swelling capacity divided by the original seed volume (ml) (for details see Khattak et al., Reference Khattak, Khattak, Mahmood, Bibi and Ihsanullah2006). The descriptive data were statistically analysed using MS-Excel 2010, and the data are presented as the means ± S.D. of three independent determinations.

Fig. 1. Field view of chickpea trials at Faculty of Agriculture (FoA), Wadura, SKUAST-Kashmir and different seed types evaluated during the present study.

Discussion

Chickpea is known for its nutritional traits, especially for seed micro and macronutrients (Fayaz et al., Reference Fayaz, Rather, Wani, Tyagi, Pandey and Mir2019; Fayaz et al., Reference Fayaz, Tyagi, Wani, Pandey, Akhtar, Bhat, Chitikineni, Varshney, Thudi, Kumar and Mir2022). Seed physical characteristics also form important traits in crop plants including chickpea. Therefore, the genetic variation for seed qualitative/physical traits was assessed using different genotypes within the cultivated gene pool of chickpea. While comparing the desi type with the pea-shaped and kabuli type, it was noticed that the kabuli type shows superior trait performance and possesses a higher average seed weight, seed volume, seed density, seed hydration capacity, swelling capacity and swelling index (Table 1). The research findings are in agreement with the findings of earlier studies (Gil et al., Reference Gil, Nadal, Luna, Moreno and Haro1996; Sastry et al., Reference Sastry, Upadhyaya and Srinivas2019), where higher seed volume, hydration capacity, hydration index and swelling capacity were observed in kabuli type chickpea. Sefa-Dedeh and Stanley (Reference Sefa-Dedeh and Stanley1979) suggested that the higher permeability may be due to the soft seed coat, softer cotyledons and seed coat thickness of kabuli type chickpea. The water absorbing capacity of the seeds also depends on the cell wall structure, seed composition and compactness of the cells (Muller, Reference Muller1967; Kaur et al., Reference Kaur, Singh and Sodhi2005). However, our findings show a low seed hydration index in kabuli than in desi type (Table 1) and these findings also received support from Iqbal et al. (Reference Iqbal, Ateeq, Khalil, Perveen and Saleemullah2006), where a higher hydration index value was reported in desi chickpea (1.083) than in kabuli chickpea (0.947).

Table 1. Variation for seed physical characteristics in different cultivated chickpea types/colour classes

While comparing different desi genotypes (desi black, desi brown and desi green) of chickpea for seed qualitative traits, it was observed that desi brown genotypes possess higher average seed weight, seed volume, seed density and seed hydration capacity. The desi green type possesses higher average seed hydration index, while the desi black type possesses higher average seed swelling capacity and swelling index (Table 1). Such findings could be explained by the greater seed size in the desi brown type than in the desi green and desi black types. The higher hydration index in the desi green in comparison with other two desi types may be due to less seed weight in desi green type. The greater swelling capacity in desi black may be due to a more porous seed coat, which gives them more water adsorption capacity. Similarly, higher values for the swelling index in the black type may be due to more swelling capacity. Furthermore, it is important to note that the pea-shaped chickpeas which are considered hybrid type chickpea between desi and kabuli types possess average seed qualitative/physical traits between desi and kabuli types (Table 1). Our findings were supported by an earlier study (Iqbal et al., Reference Iqbal, Ateeq, Khalil, Perveen and Saleemullah2006). It was reported in this study that hydration capacity for pea-shaped (0.290) was intermediate between desi (0.219) and kabuli type chickpea (0.392). The results similar to our findings were also reported by Özer et al. (Reference Özer, Karaköy, Toklu, Baloch, Kilian and Özkan2010). They reported that chickpea genotypes with greater hydration and swelling capacity would have softer seed coats and cotyledon, and in our study, greater hydration and swelling capacity was also shown by the kabuli types having softer seed coat cotyledons.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262123000084.

References

Barampama, Z and Simard, RE (1995) Effects of soaking, cooking and fermentation on composition, in-vitro starch digestibility and nutritive value of common beans. Plant Foods Human Nutrition 48, 349365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fayaz, H, Rather, IA, Wani, AA, Tyagi, S, Pandey, R and Mir, RR (2019) Characterization of chickpea gene pools for nutrient concentrations under agro-climatic conditions of North-Western Himalaya. Plant Genetic Resources 17, 464467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayaz, H, Mir, AH, Tyagi, S, Wani, AA, Jan, N, Yasin, M, Iqbal, J, Mondal, B, Khan, MA and Mir, RR (2021) Assessment of molecular genetic diversity of 384 chickpea genotypes and development of core set of 192 genotypes for chickpea improvement programs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 69, 11931205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01296-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fayaz, H, Tyagi, S, Wani, AA, Pandey, R, Akhtar, S, Bhat, MA, Chitikineni, A, Varshney, RK, Thudi, M, Kumar, U and Mir, RR (2022) Genome-wide association analysis to delineate high-quality SNPs for seed micronutrient density in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Scientific Reports 12, 11357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14487-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gil, J, Nadal, S, Luna, D, Moreno, MT and Haro, AD (1996) Variability of some physico-chemical characters in desi and kabuli chickpea types. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 71, 179184.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iqbal, A, Ateeq, N, Khalil, IA, Perveen, S and Saleemullah, S (2006) Physicochemical characteristics and amino acid profile of chickpea cultivars grown in Pakistan. Journal of Food Service 17, 94101.Google Scholar
Kaur, M, Singh, N and Sodhi, NS (2005) Physicochemical, cooking, textural and roasting characteristics of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. Journal of Food Engineering 69, 511517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khattak, AB, Khattak, GSS, Mahmood, Z, Bibi, N and Ihsanullah, I (2006) Study of selected quality and agronomic characteristics and their interrelationship in Kabuli-type chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Food Science Technology 41, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehla, IS, Waldia, SR and Dahiya, SS (2001) Variation and relationship among cooking quality attributes across the environments in ‘Kabuli’ chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Science and Technology 3, 283286.Google Scholar
Mir, AH, Bhat, MA, Dar, SA, Sofi, PA, Bhat, NA and Mir, RR (2021) Assessment of cold tolerance in chickpea (Cicer spp.) grown under cold/freezing weather conditions of North-Western Himalayas of Jammu and Kashmir, India. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 27, 11051118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muller, FM (1967) Cooking quality of pulses. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 18, 292295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ortega, R, Hecht, V, Freeman, J, Rubio, J, Carrasquilla-Garcia, N and Mir, RR (2019) Altered expression of an FT cluster underlies a major locus controlling domestication-related changes to chickpea phenology and growth habit. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özer, S, Karaköy, T, Toklu, F, Baloch, FS, Kilian, B and Özkan, H (2010) Nutritional and physicochemical variation in Turkish kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces. Euphytica 175, 237249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patane, C, Iacoponi, E and Raccuia, SA (2004) Physico-chemical characteristics, water absorption, soaking and cooking properties of some Sicilian populations of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 55, 547554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramasamy, R and Harte, JB (2009) Milling and physicochemical properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 89, 258266.Google Scholar
Reyes-Moreno, C, Okamura-Esparza, J, Armienta-Rodelo, E, Gomez-Garza, RM and Milán-Carrillo, J (2000) Hard-to-cook phenomenon in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L): effect of accelerated storage on quality. Plant Foods Human Nutrition 55, 229241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sastry, DVSSR, Upadhyaya, HD and Srinivas, TR (2019) Variation for seed physical and hydration properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) mini core collection and their relevance to conservation and utilization. Plant Genetic Resources 17, 311324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sefa-Dedeh, S and Stanley, DW (1979) Textural implications of the microstructure of legumes. Food Technology 33, 7783.Google Scholar
Sivasakthi, K, Marques, E, Kalungwana, NA, Carrasquilla-Garcia, N, Chang, PL, Bergmann, EM, … Penmetsa, RV (2019) Functional dissection of the chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) stay-green phenotype associated with molecular variation at an ortholog of Mendel's I gene for cotyledon color: implications for crop production and carotenoid biofortification. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, 5562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waldia, RS (1996) Association and variation among cooking quality traits in kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Food Science Technology 33, 397402.Google Scholar
Williams, PC, Nakoul, H and Singh, KB (1983) Relationship between cooking time and some physical characteristics in chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.). Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 492496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youssef, MM, Bushuk, W, Murray, ED, Zillman, R and Shehata, AET (1982) Relationship between cookability and some chemical and physical properties of faba beans (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Food Science 47, 16951697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Field view of chickpea trials at Faculty of Agriculture (FoA), Wadura, SKUAST-Kashmir and different seed types evaluated during the present study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Variation for seed physical characteristics in different cultivated chickpea types/colour classes

Supplementary material: File

Fayaz et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Fayaz et al. supplementary material(File)
File 52.2 KB