Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:26:50.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating default mode network connectivity disruption in children of mothers with depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2021

Maor Zeev-Wolf
Affiliation:
Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel; and Department of Education and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
Yair Dor-Ziderman
Affiliation:
Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel; and Edmond J. Safra Brain Research Center, University of Haifa, Israel
Maayan Pratt
Affiliation:
Department of Education and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; and Department of Psychology and Gonda Brain Science Center, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
Abraham Goldstein
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology and Gonda Brain Science Center, Bar-Ilan University, Israel
Ruth Feldman*
Affiliation:
Baruch Ivcher School of Psychology, Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya, Israel; and Child Study Center, Yale University, Connecticut, USA
*
Correspondence: Ruth Feldman. Email: ruth.feldman@idc.ac.il
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Exposure to maternal major depressive disorder (MDD) bears long-term negative consequences for children's well-being; to date, no research has examined how exposure at different stages of development differentially affects brain functioning.

Aims

Utilising a unique cohort followed from birth to preadolescence, we examined the effects of early versus later maternal MDD on default mode network (DMN) connectivity.

Method

Maternal depression was assessed at birth and ages 6 months, 9 months, 6 years and 10 years, to form three groups: children of mothers with consistent depression from birth to 6 years of age, which resolved by 10 years of age; children of mothers without depression; and children of mothers who were diagnosed with MDD in late childhood. In preadolescence, we used magnetoencephalography and focused on theta rhythms, which characterise the developing brain.

Results

Maternal MDD was associated with disrupted DMN connectivity in an exposure-specific manner. Early maternal MDD decreased child connectivity, presenting a profile typical of early trauma or chronic adversity. In contrast, later maternal MDD was linked with tighter connectivity, a pattern characteristic of adult depression. Aberrant DMN connectivity was predicted by intrusive mothering in infancy and lower mother–child reciprocity and child empathy in late childhood, highlighting the role of deficient caregiving and compromised socio-emotional competencies in DMN dysfunction.

Conclusions

The findings pinpoint the distinct effects of early versus later maternal MDD on the DMN, a core network sustaining self-related processes. Results emphasise that research on the influence of early adversity on the developing brain should consider the developmental stage in which the adversity occured.

Type
Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

Maternal major depressive disorder

Maternal major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent condition, affecting 12–15% of women in industrial societies and 30% in the developing world. Extant research has demonstrated that exposure to maternal depression carries long-term negative consequences for children's well-being by increasing propensity for psychopathology, disrupting maturation of stress management systems and impairing socio-emotional competencies, executive functions and the capacity for empathy.Reference Goodman, Rouse, Connell, Broth, Hall and Heyward1Reference Tomarken, Dichter, Garber and Simien6 Less research has focused on the effects of maternal MDD on the developing brain. Although several studies described the effects of maternal postnatal depressive symptoms on the infant brain,Reference Wen, Soe, Sim, Sanmugam, Kwek and Chong7Reference Jones, Field, Fox, Lundy and Davalos12 prospective longitudinal studies that begin at birth and repeatedly diagnose maternal depression to test its impact on child brain functioning are rare. Specifically, no study, to our knowledge, has examined the effects of maternal MDD experienced at different developmental nodes on neural function. This question taps the broader issue of timing effects and how various adversities, including trauma, abuse, neglect, physical illness and parental psychopathology, affect children's brains when experienced at different stages of brain maturation. In the current study, we focus on default mode network (DMN) connectivity in children exposed to maternal MDD at different points in development, compared with those who were never exposed.

The DMN in psychopathology

The DMN is a core network sustaining the sense of self, autobiographical memory, internal attention and quiescence.Reference Andrews-Hanna13Reference Raichle16 The DMN comprises seven cortical areas (see Fig. 1(b)) that are more active and synchronised when the brain is not engaged in task-positive activity.Reference Raichle16 Connectivity among the DMN structures has been associated with adaptive physiological, cognitive and socio-emotional processes,Reference Andrews-Hanna13, Reference Li, Mai and Liu14 whereas disruptions to DMN connectivity have been linked with early adversity and psychiatric conditions.Reference Whitfield-Gabrieli and Ford17 Specifically, conditions involving adverse rearing, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders and abuse are associated with a reduction in DMN connectivity.Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18Reference Soares, Sampaio, Ferreira, Santos, Marques and Marques25 Reduced DMN connectivity, in turn, is related to avoidant behaviour, hyperarousal, intrusive memories, and emotional and physical symptoms.Reference Lanius, Bluhm, Coupland, Hegadoren, Rowe and Théberge23,Reference King, Block, Sripada, Rauch, Giardino and Favorite26 Moreover, since the DMN intersects with the social brain network,Reference Mars, Neubert, Noonan, Sallet, Toni and Rushworth27 DMN connectivity has been linked with socio-emotional competencies, including empathy,Reference Kim, Kim, Kim, Han, Jeong and Kim28 trust and reciprocal social behaviour.Reference Bellucci, Hahn, Deshpande and Krueger29

Fig. 1 (a) An illustration of the theta frequency band (4–7 Hz). (b) The locations of the seven seeds of the default mode network (DMN; taken from Reference Sripada, Swain, Evans, Welsh and Liberzon21). Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) seed coordinates (mm, Left-Posterior-Iinferior (LPI)) are as follows: right medial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC; 2, 53, 24); dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC; −13, 52, 23); ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC; −2, 51, 2); right angular gyrus (RAG; 51,−64, 32); left angular gyrus (LAG; −43,−76, 35); posterior cingulate cortex/praecuneus (PCC; −3, −54, 31) and left inferior temporal gyrus (LITG: −57, −25, −17). (c) Bar plot of averaged (over all 21 seed-pair connections) theta phase-lock values (PLV). Connectivity values between the different DMN nodes in children exposed to (d) early maternal depression (n = 13), (e) later maternal depression (n = 16) and (f) healthy controls (n = 45). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, P < 0.1. Error bars represent s.e.

In contrast to the decreased connectivity in conditions involving early trauma, depression is associated with tighter DMN connectivity in adults.Reference Greicius, Flores, Menon and Glover30Reference Li, Friston, Mody, Wang, Lu and Hu33 Increased connectivity, mainly across the brain's midline structures such as between the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex/praecuneus (PCC), was found to predict the severity of depressive ruminations,Reference Zhou, Chen, Shen, Li, Chen and Zhu34Reference Wise, Marwood, Perkins, Herane-Vives, Joules and Lythgoe36 and connectivity between the PCC and other brain regions appears to play a role in MDD. Depression increases connectivity between the PCC and mPFC during emotional identification,Reference Ho, Connolly, Henje Blom, LeWinn, Strigo and Paulus37 and between the PCC and cingulate cortex during memory tasks.Reference Berman, Peltier, Nee, Kross, Deldin and Jonides38 When comparing resting state connectivity of patients with MDD and controls, greater connectivity between the PCC and frontal regions emerged in patients with MDD who were not receiving medication.Reference Cheng, Rolls, Qiu, Xie, Wei and Huang39 Furthermore, a 5-week repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation directed to the DMN reduced hyperconnectivity in the DMN in 17 patients with MDD, and this reduction was linked with improvement in clinical symptoms.Reference Liston, Chen, Zebley, Drysdale, Gordon and Leuchter40 The authors concluded that greater connectivity in the DMN plays a crucial role in MDD, and therefore lowering DMN connectivity can result in clinical improvement.

Although most studies on DMN connectivity target adults, existing studies in children and adolescents point to disruptions in DMN connectivity in various high-risk conditions.Reference Sato, Biazoli, Salum, Gadelha, Crossley and Satterthwaite41Reference Viard, Mutlu, Chanraud, Guenolé, Egler and Gérardin45 Using magnetoencephalography (MEG), it was found that preadolescents exposed to chronic trauma showed decreased DMN connectivity in the theta band,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18 the oscillatory rhythm that characterises the developing brain.Reference Clarke, Barry, McCarthy and Selikowitz46,Reference Klimesch47 DMN connectivity was lowest among children diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, and was longitudinally predicted by maternal intrusive behaviour in infancy. In contrast, a study of 13- to 17-year-olds showed that adolescent depression was associated with increased DMN connectivity;Reference Ho, Connolly, Henje Blom, LeWinn, Strigo and Paulus37 however, to our knowledge, no study has examined DMN connectivity in children or adolescents exposed to maternal depression.

Timing effects in exposure to maternal MDD

A ‘sensitive period’, which posits that the brain requires specific environmental inputs at each stage for proper growth,Reference Feldman48,Reference Hensch49 has typically been missing from research on early adversity. Infancy and early childhood mark the most pronounced sensitive periods, when the brain requires attuned maternal caregiving for maturation of core structure and function,Reference Sarro, Wilson and Sullivan50,Reference Curley and Champagne51 and deficient caregiving from mothers with MDD impairs proper brain development.Reference Ashman and Dawson52 However, late childhood (before the onset of puberty) involves important brain reorganisation in terms of synaptic pruning, cortical thinning and white matter restructuring.Reference Konrad, Firk and Uhlhaas53Reference Zhou, Lebel, Treit, Evans and Beaulieu55 Brain functions and structural network organisation in late childhood have been linked with dimensions of the mother–child relationship, including reciprocity,Reference Pratt, Goldstein and Feldman56 intrusiveness, controlling parentingReference Richmond, Beare, Johnson, Allen, Seal and Whittle57 and maternal mind-mindedness, autonomy supportReference Dégeilh, Bernier, Leblanc, Daneault and Beauchamp58 and cooperation.Reference Miller, Vrtička, Cui, Shrestha, Hosseini and Baker59 Maternal depression in late childhood is associated with low mother–child reciprocity, which compromises key social abilities, such as empathy and engagement.Reference Priel, Zeev-Wolf, Djalovski and Feldman4,Reference Priel, Djalovski, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman60 These disruptions may uniquely affect DMN connectivity at the stage when children leave the family to enter the larger social world.

The current study tested timing effects in the association between exposure to maternal MDD during the first decade of life and disruptions to DMN connectivity in preadolescence. We utilised a unique birth cohort followed for 11 years, which included repeated diagnosis of maternal MDD and extreme-case design in families of otherwise low risk. This enabled us to tease apart children exposed to maternal MDD across early, but not later childhood from those exposed during late childhood, and from those never exposed to maternal MDD or other maternal psychiatric conditions across the first decade – a possibility never before available in research on the long-term effects of maternal MDD. Two hypotheses were formed. First, we expected that exposure to maternal MDD at any point would lead to disruptions in DMN connectivity, and that the effects would depend on timing of exposure. As an open research question, we examined whether exposure to maternal MDD in early, but not later childhood would resemble the profile characterising early trauma and lead to decreased DMN connectivity, whereas later exposure would resemble the tighter connectivity typical of depression. Second, we expected that the deficient parenting and compromised social abilities associated with maternal depression would predict disruptions to DMN connectivity. Specifically, maternal intrusiveness in infancy was found to predict disrupted DMN connectivity in trauma-exposed youth,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18 and disruptions to the neural basis of empathy in children of mothers with depression.Reference Vakrat, Apter-Levy and Feldman61 Similarly, lower mother–child reciprocity impairs the neural basis of empathy in young adults,Reference Ulmer-Yaniv, Salomon, Waidergoren, Shimon-Raz, Djalovski and Feldman62 and low empathy is linked with reduced DMN connectivity in adolescence.Reference Li, Mai and Liu14,Reference Kim, Kim, Kim, Han, Jeong and Kim28,Reference Zhou, Yao, Fairchild, Cao, Zhang and Xiang44,Reference Reniers, Corcoran, Völlm, Mashru, Howard and Liddle63 These factors were thus expected to predict disrupted DMN connectivity in children exposed to maternal depression.

Method

Participants

Our 11-year follow-up of a community birth cohort aimed to test the effects of maternal depression on child development and brain maturation, separate from the frequently occurring comorbidity often included in research on maternal depression (e.g. single parenting, poverty, teenage mothering, substance misuse, premature birth); hence, all families were of low risk and mothers and children were healthy. Data collection was conducted in seven waves. At each wave, mothers suffering from a comorbidity were excluded from the study.

Birth

The initial cohort included 1983 consecutive admissions to two university hospitals. Research assistants visited the maternity wards and invited women who were physically healthy, delivered a healthy-term singleton infant, completed at least 12 years of education, were above the poverty line and were cohabitating with the infant's father, to participate in research on maternal postpartum mood. Women completed demographic questionnaires and the Beck Depression Index (BDI)Reference Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock and Erbaugh64 and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)Reference Spielberger, Gorsuch and Lushene65 questionnaires. Of the approached women, 39.8% refused participation, and hospital records showed no differences on demographic variables between participating and declining women.

Six months

Of the 1983 women recruited at birth, we wanted to create cohorts of mothers with consistent depression versus mothers without depression. We thus selected women in the high (BDI scores >11) and low (BDI scores 0–5) ends of the depressive symptoms continuum at birth to complete measures of anxiety and depression by mail at 6 months (900 approached, 680 responded (75.5%); no difference in demographics and mood).

Nine months: questionnaires

From the 680 women who responded at 6 months, we again sent questionnaires to those at the high and low ends of the BDI scores at 9 months (350 approached, 254 responded (72.5%); no differences in demographics and mood).

Nine months: home visit

Of the 254 mothers responding at 9 months, we contacted 210 mothers at the high and low ends of the depressive symptoms continuum who did not report high anxiety (STAI score > 43), and 192 agreed to a home visit (91.4%; no differences in demographics and mood). These mothers were diagnosed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I)Reference First, Spitzer, Gibbon and Williams66 and mother–child interactions were videotaped.

Six years: home visit

Of the 192 families seen at 9 months, we contacted all families we were able to locate at 6 years. We visited 156 families (81.2%), and attrition was mainly related to inability to locate families. At 6 years, mothers were again diagnosed by a clinical psychologist with the SCID-I,Reference First, Spitzer, Gibbon and Williams66 and children diagnosed with the Development and Well-Being Assessment (DAWBA,Reference Goodman, Ford, Richards, Gatward and Meltzer67 see below). This led to two cohorts: 46 mothers who reported high depressive symptoms at birth, 6 and 9 months and were diagnosed with Axis I depression at both 9 months and 6 years, and 103 mothers who reported no elevated symptoms at any time point and had no psychiatric diagnosis.

Ten years: home visit

We visited 125 families (80.1%) of the families visited at 6 years, and attrition was again mainly related to inability to locate families. Maternal and child psychiatric conditions were again diagnosed with the SCID-I and DAWBA, to form three groups: (a) early depression, defined as children exposed to maternal depression across the first 6 years but not at 10 years; (b) later depression, defined as children exposed to maternal depression at late childhood regardless of previous MDD diagnosis; and (c) healthy controls, defined as children whose mothers without an MDD diagnosis or any other psychiatric diagnosis across the first decade.

Eleven years: MEG

We were able to locate and contact 110 families and 90 underwent MEG scanning, excluding children with metal implants (81.8%). Of these, 16 children were in the later depression group, 13 children were in the early depression group, and 45 children were in the healthy control group. MEG data was available for 74 participants (43 boys; mean age 11.0 years, s.d. 1.07). Data were excluded because of muscle artifacts, movement or inability to complete session. Groups did not differ in terms of age (F(2,73) = 0.54, P = 0.592), gender (χ 2(2) = 2.19, P = 0.334), birth order (χ 2(2) = 0.41, P = 0.816) and current diagnosis of psychiatric disorders (χ2(2) = 1.19, P = 0.551).

Ethics

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human participants were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Bar Ilan University, Israel (approval number 2087). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Families received a small gift for participation.

MEG data acquisition, analysis and statistics

Spontaneous brain activity was measured by MEG, when participants rested for 2 min with open eyes (to reduce stress among young participants caused by lying still in a shielded room by themselves with no stimuli to engage). Ongoing brain activity was recorded with whole-head 248-channel magnetometer array (4-D Neuroimaging, Magnes 3600WH) in supine position, inside a magnetically shielded room. Data were sampled online at 1017.23 Hz with a bandpass of 0.1–400 Hz. Reference coils located approximately 30 cm above the head, oriented by the x-, y- and z-axes, were used to remove environmental noise. Five coils were attached to the scalp for recording the head position relative to the 248-sensor array. External noise and heartbeat artifacts were removed with a predesigned algorithm.Reference Tal and Abeles68 Further data analysis were performed with MATLAB R2014b for Windows (MathWorks, Massachusetts, USA; https://matlab.mathworks.com) and FieldTrip 2016 toolbox for Windows (Donders Institute, Nijmegen, Netherlands; https://www.fieldtriptoolbox.org).Reference Oostenveld, Fries, Maris and Schoffelen69 Data were segmented into 1000 ms epochs (with 500 ms overlap). Trials containing muscle artifacts and signal jumps were excluded by visual inspection. Data were then filtered in the 1–100 Hz range, with 5 s of padding. To clean eye blinks, eye movements and leftover heartbeats, spatial component analysis was applied. Finally, visual inspection was conducted and contaminated trials were excluded.

DMN seed coordinates were predefined based on prior MEG functional magnetic resonance imaging research.Reference de Pasquale, Della Penna, Snyder, Marzetti, Pizzella and Romani70 Head shape was normalised to fit a child's brain template from the Montreal Neurological Institute, using SPM8 for Windows (Wellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, UK; www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk). Brain volumes were divided into a regular 1-cm grid. For each grid position, spatial filters were reconstructed to record activity from location of interest while suppressing other activity.

Consistent with prior research,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18 DMN connectivity was calculated by extracting time series from the activation seeds after applying a linear-constrained minimum-variance beamformerReference Van Veen, van Drongelen, Yuchtman and Suzuki71 in the theta band (4–7 Hz). Next, we computed the phase-lock value (PLV) between all seed pairs ($\left({\matrix{ 7 \cr 2 \cr } } \right)$ = 21 pairs). PLV measures the phase difference between two recorded signals to quantify phase consistency difference over time.Reference Lachaux, Rodriguez, Martinerie and Varela72 Differences in averaged PLV connectivity were tested by a one-way ANOVA, with early depression, late depression and healthy control groups as between-participant factors. To detect specific significant DMN seed pairs, a series of F-tests were conducted between groups for each of the 21 seed pairs and corrected for multiple comparisons by nonparametric permutation tests.Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18,Reference Nichols and Holmes73 For each permutation, an independent F-test was repeated 1000 times, group was randomly assigned for each participant and the number of significant (P < 0.05) seed pairs was recorded. A frequency distribution of the number of significant seed pairs was used to determine the critical significant seed-pair size, which corresponded to the 50th maximal number (5%).

Measures across the first decade

Maternal and child psychiatric conditions

Mothers were diagnosed at 9 months, 6 years and 10 years, with the SCID-I.Reference Wise, Marwood, Perkins, Herane-Vives, Joules and Lythgoe36,Reference First, Spitzer, Gibbon and Williams74 Child psychiatric disorders was diagnosed by a clinical psychologist at 6 and 10 years, using the DAWBA,Reference Goodman, Ford, Richards, Gatward and Meltzer67 a well-validated tool.Reference Mars, Neubert, Noonan, Sallet, Toni and Rushworth27 Diagnoses were conducted by four clinical psychologists supervised by child psychiatrist who were blind to all information, with cases conferred every few weeks and reliability above 85%.

Mother intrusiveness at 9 months

We filmed 10 min of mother and child free-play 9 months.Reference Feldman75 Interactions were coded with the Coding Interactive Behavior (CIB) manual,Reference Feldman76 a well-validated coding scheme with good psychometric properties.Reference Feldman77 Two coders, trained to 85% reliability and blind to all other information, coded the interactions, with interrater reliability computed for 20% of interactions exceeding 87% (intraclass r = 0.91, range 0.87–0.99). The ‘maternal intrusiveness’ construct included maternal overriding, forcing, anxiety/hostility, parent-led interactions and inconsistent parenting (Cronbach's alpha 0.90).

Mother–child reciprocity at 10 years

Mothers and their children engaged in positive and negative discussion paradigms.Reference Priel, Djalovski, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman60 The reciprocity construct was similarly coded by trained coders using the CIB, with interrater reliability for 20% of interactions exceeding 89% (intraclass r = 0.92, range 0.88–0.99), and included synchrony, mutual adaptation, fluency, recognition of partner's signals, containment, behavioural empathy and giving space (Cronbach's alpha 0.91).

Child empathy at 10 years

Empathy was coded from two observational paradigms, which exposed children to the experimenter's distress, hurting their foot and losing an expensive watch, consistent with prior research.Reference Apter-Levy, Feldman, Vakart, Ebstein and Feldman78 Each episode was coded (1–5) on several scales,Reference Holm79 with reliability >90%. The ‘empathy’ construct was the average of ‘empathic concern’ and ‘maintaining involvement’ scales from the two paradigms.

Statistical analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS for Windows (IBM statistics version 26) and Jamovi version 1.6 for Windows (Jamovi project, Sydney, Australia; http://www.jamovi.org). Differences between groups were assessed via one-way ANOVAs and post hoc pairwise comparisons. The Bonferroni–Holm methodReference Holm79 was used for controlling the family-wise error rate. Hierarchical logistic regression assessed added and cumulative contribution of measures across the first decade of life to neurotypical/aberrant DMN connectivity. R 2 was assessed with McFadden's method, and a receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to graphically represent the connection and trade-off between clinical sensitivity and specificity for every possible cut-off of each test or combination of tests.Reference Hosmer and Lemeshow80

Results

DMN connectivity

Significant group effect was found for overall averaged DMN PLV connectivity (F(2,71) = 6.21, P = 0.003, η2 = 0.149). Pairwise comparisons indicated (Fig. 1(c)) higher PLV in the later depression group (mean 0.569, s.d. 0.149) relative to healthy controls (mean 0.483, s.d. 0.111) (t(59) = 2.54, P = 0.026) and the early depression group (mean 0.418, s.d. 0.086) (t(27) = 3.46, P = 0.003). Children in the early depression group displayed marginally significant lower PLV than healthy controls (t(56) = −1.75, P = 0.084). Importantly, within the later depression group, there were no differences between children of mothers with continuous depression since birth (n = 9, mean 0.578, s.d. 0.186) and those whose mothers were diagnosed with MDD at 10 years (n = 7, mean 0.557, s.d. 0.097) (t(14) = 0.271, P = 0.79).

Post hoc analyses revealed seven significant seed-pair connections. The permutation analysis indicated that these did not reflect false positives (P = 0.001). Of these, four connections indicated significantly higher connectivity for the later depression group relative to the healthy control group, and three indicated significantly lower connectivity for the early depression group relative to the healthy control group (all P < 0.05). The PCC-dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC), PCC-ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC), vMPFC and right angular gyrus (RAG)-right medial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC) displayed higher connectivity for the later depression group relative to the healthy control group (Fig. 2(a,c)); the RAG-PCC, RAG-vMPFC and vMPFC-left inferior temporal gyrus (LITG) displayed lower connectivity for the early depression group relative to the healthy control group (Fig. 2(b,d)).

Fig. 2 Default mode network (DMN) phase-lock value (PLV) connectivity differences between children exposed to early maternal depression (n = 13) (a and c) and later maternal depression (n = 16) (b and d), relative to healthy controls (n = 45). (a and b) All possible seed-pair DMN PLV connections, with black lines indicating non-significant connections, blue lines indicating connections weaker than controls and red lines indicating connections stronger than controls. (c and d) Strength of connectivity values between the different DMN nodes. Significant connections are marked by *. dMPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; LAG, left angular gyrus; LITG, left inferior temporal gyrus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex/praecuneus; RAG, right angular gyrus; RMPFC, right medial prefrontal cortex; vMPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Predicting aberrant DMN connectivity from variables across the first decade

Following the results indicating extreme (low or high) DMN values in children exposed to early or later maternal MDD, the DMN PLV connectivity values of all participants were classified either as mid-level connectivity (second and third quartiles), high connectivity (fourth quartile) or low connectivity (first quartile). One-way ANOVAs indicated significant group differences for maternal intrusiveness at 9 months (F(2,71) = 3.75, P = 0.028, η2 = 0.095), and mother–child reciprocity (F(2,68) = 7.96, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.19) and child empathy (F(2,67) = 5.88, P = 0.004, η2 = 0.149) at 10 years. Descriptive statistics showed that the high-connectivity and low-connectivity groups differed from the mid-level connectivity group on all three measures but did not differ from each other. Infants in both high-connectivity and low-connectivity groups experienced more maternal intrusiveness (high connectivity: meandifference 0.514, s.e.difference 0.219, t(54) = 2.2, P = 0.023; low connectivity: meandifference 0.486, s.e.difference 0.221, t(53) = 2.2, P = 0.032) and less reciprocity (high connectivity: meandifference −0.378, s.e.difference 0.129, t(51) = −2.94, P = 0.005; low connectivity: meandifference −0.427, s.e.difference 0.104, t(50) = −4.12, P < 0.001), and showed decreased empathy (high connectivity: meandifference −0.485, s.e.difference 0.243, t(51) = −2, P = 0.051; low connectivity: meandifference −0.766, s.e.difference 0.247, t(50) = −3.1, P = 0.003), compared with the mid-level connectivity group. Additionally, the high-connectivity and low-connectivity groups did not differ on intrusiveness, reciprocity and empathy (all P > 0.3). Thus, high-connectivity and low-connectivity groups were combined into an aberrant connectivity group. Fig. 3(a) presents t-tests indicating significant differences (Holm–Bonferroni corrected) between the aberrant connectivity and control (mid-level connectivity) groups for intrusiveness (t(72) = 2.75, P = 0.007), reciprocity (t(69) =−4, P < 0.001) and empathy (t(68) = −3.44, P = 0.003). Notably, the aberrant and mid-level DMN connectivity (control) groups did not differ on child psychiatric disorders at a 6 or 10 years (overall psychopathology, mood disorders or externalising disorders) (all P > 0.3).

Fig. 3 (a) Means, medians and 95% confidence intervals of mother intrusiveness at 9 months of age, mother–child reciprocity at 10 years of age, and child empathy at 10 years of age, for default mode network (DMN) mid-level connectivity (controls: n = 37) and DMN aberrant connectivity (n = 37) groups. (b) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the gender/age variables (blue) compared with a model also including intrusiveness (red), and a model also including reciprocity and empathy variables (green). Reference line (orange) denotes chance-alone classification level.

To test the effects of caregiving and socio-emotional factors across the first decade on DMN connectivity (aberrant versus mid-level) in preadolescence, a hierarchical logistic regression analysis was conducted. Specifically, we tested the added and cumulative predictive utility, beyond age and gender (step 1), of maternal intrusiveness at 9 months (step 2), and mother–child reciprocity and child empathy at 10 years (step 3; see Table 1), on aberrant DMN connectivity at preadolescence. Results indicated that although age/gender (step 1) were not significantly predictive (χ 2(2) = 3.4, P = 0.182), when entering maternal intrusiveness (step 2) (χ 2(3) = 8.17, P = 0.043, R 2McFadden's = 0.086), the model significantly predicted aberrant DMN connectivity, and the further addition of reciprocity and empathy (step 3) (χ 2(5) = 27.68, P < 0.0001, R 2McFadden's = 0.29) contributed meaningfully to prediction. Statistically significant increments in the regression models were observed for step 2 versus step 1 (χ 2difference(1) = 4.77, P = 0.029), and step 3 versus step 2 (χ 2difference(2) = 19.51, P < 0.0001).

Table 1 Hierarchical logistic regression results for step 3 model

Final models were further submitted to receiver operating characteristic analysis. Three curves were plotted (Fig. 3), each corresponding to age and gender (step 1), mother intrusiveness (step 2) and reciprocity and empathy (step 3) factors. The area under the curve (AUC) for the age and gender model was not significant beyond chance-alone reference (AUC = 0.624, s.e. 0.067, P = 0.076; 95% CI 0.49–0.75); however, the AUCs for both mother intrusiveness (AUC = 0.682, s.e. 0.064, P = 0.009; 95% CI 0.55–0.81) and reciprocity/empathy (AUC = 0.837, s.e. 0.05, P < 0.000; 95% CI 0.74–0.93) were significant and indicate an excellent diagnostic accuracy.Reference Hosmer and Lemeshow80 The contribution of the final step 3 model (maternal intrusiveness, reciprocity and empathy) beyond the age and gender variables increased the AUC by 21.3%, with marginal overlap (of 1%) of the 95% confidence interval, indicating an important and significant contribution to the distinction of aberrant versus healthy control DMN connectivity.

Discussion

Timing effects, the differential effects of environmental adversities experienced at different stages of brain maturation, has rarely been tested in prospective longitudinal research. By utilising a unique community cohort followed from birth to preadolescence and repeatedly evaluating maternal MDD, we were able to pinpoint, for the first time, the effects of exposure to maternal depression in early life from the effects of late-childhood exposure on the DMN, a core network sustaining multiple self-related functions. We found that DMN connectivity in the theta band, the pronounced rhythm of the developing brain, was impaired in children exposed to maternal MDD in a time-sensitive manner. Exposure in early life reduced DMN connectivity, paralleling the profile of trauma or early adversity, whereas exposure in late childhood led to tighter DMN connectivity, mirroring the findings for adult depression and presenting cross-generational similarity. Aberrant DMN connectivity, whether hyper- or hypo-connectivity, was predicted by age-specific disruptions to caregiving – intrusive mothering in infancyReference Apter-Levi, Pratt, Vakart, Feldman, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman81 and lower reciprocity in late childhood – presenting deficiencies in the dialogical and empathic dyadic style associated with maternal depression.Reference Priel, Zeev-Wolf, Djalovski and Feldman4 Children's capacity for empathy, which is shaped by the experience of reciprocal parenting,Reference Feldman82 was similarly deficient in children of mothers with depression, and predicted aberrant DMN connectivity, consistent with prior research indicating that breaches in caregiving and disruptions in core socio-emotional competencies impair DMN maturation.Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18,Reference Dégeilh, Bernier, Leblanc, Daneault and Beauchamp58,Reference Rudie, Shehzad, Hernandez, Colich, Bookheimer and Iacoboni83

The reduced DMN connectivity found for the early depression group is consistent with prior studies showing decreased DMN connectivity in preadolescence in the context of early trauma.Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18 In both studies, the decreased connectivity implicated connectivity with RAG.Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Ebstein and Feldman84 The RAG plays a key role in social cognition and emotion regulation, which are impaired in children of mothers with depression.Reference Seghier85Reference Cheng, Rolls, Qiu, Yang, Ruan and Wei87 The reduced connectivity of the RAG with the PCC and dMPFC found in both studies supports the hypothesis that early maternal depression that abates before the child reaches puberty may be registered in the brain as early trauma. Further, reduced RAG-PCC connectivity was observed in adults who experience early-life trauma.Reference Bluhm, Williamson, Osuch, Frewen, Stevens and Boksman20 The RAG is more active during psychological stress, and is critically involved in attention and mental functions, social cognition and emotion regulation, factors that are impaired in children and adolescents of mothers with depression and in those suffering from early trauma.Reference Seghier85Reference Wang, Rao, Wetmore, Furlan, Korczykowski and Dinges89 Hence, reduced RAG connectivity may augment the effects of early maternal depression on social and mental dysfunctions in later life, similar to early trauma.

In contrast, exposure to MDD in later childhood increased DMN connectivity. Specifically, findings show tighter connectivity in the DMN's medial nodes. The DMN midline structures were found to be consistently and conjointly activated during self-related processing,Reference Buckner, Andrews-Hanna and Schacter15,Reference Northoff, Heinzel, de Greck, Bermpohl, Dobrowolny and Panksepp90Reference Davey, Pujol and Harrison92 and are suggested to underpin the sense of self.Reference Northoff and Bermpohl93,Reference Qin and Northoff94 The DMN undergoes hierarchical DMN organisation and integration, and at the transition to adolescence, DMN activity and connectivity become similar to that of adults.Reference Fair, Cohen, Dosenbach, Church, Miezin and Barch95 Specifically, a gradual increase in functional connectivity between anterior and posterior DMN regions takes place between 7 and 15 yearsReference Sato, Salum, Gadelha, Picon, Pan and Vieira96 and between 10 and 13 years,Reference Sherman, Rudie, Pfeifer, Masten, McNealy and Dapretto97 suggesting that preadolescence is a sensitive period for maturation of the DMN's functional architecture. Our findings suggest that exposure to maternal MDD in late childhood may have distinct effects on DMN functionality that may undermine the development of the sense of self.

Depression is often accompanied by persistent ruminationsReference Zhou, Chen, Shen, Li, Chen and Zhu34 that are self-focusedReference Hamilton, Farmer, Fogelman and Gotlib35 and implicate heightened activity and connectivity over the DMN's midline structures.Reference Buckner, Andrews-Hanna and Schacter15,Reference Hamilton, Farmer, Fogelman and Gotlib35,Reference Tozzi, Zhang, Chesnut, Holt-Gosselin, Ramirez and Williams98,Reference Sheline, Barch, Price, Rundle, Vaishnavi and Snyder99 Our findings show a similar pattern of increased connectivity in medial nodes of the DMN in preadolescents exposed to maternal MDD in late childhood. It is possible that in preadolescence, the child's brain activity presents a profile that resembles that of the mother with MDD. Such a parallel in the depressive profile is consistent with extant research indicating that exposure to maternal depression in early childhood increases rates of child anxiety disorders while exposure to maternal depression by late childhood/adolescence leads to depression.Reference Holm79Reference Essau100,Reference Hammen, Gotlib and Hammen101

Both maternal caregiving and child socio-emotional outcomes have been linked with DMN activity,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Ebstein and Feldman84 and our findings are consistent with this research. Mother–child reciprocity and children's empathic capacities predicted normative versus aberrant DMN connectivity in preadolescence above and beyond exposure to maternal depression. These findings have clinical implications for the ever-increasing population of children exposed to maternal depression. Dyadic interventions aimed at improving the mother's ability to engage in reciprocal dialogue that acknowledges the child's verbal and nonverbal communications and respects multiple perspectives, particularly in late childhood, may have important implications for neural development at the transition to adolescence.

Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, although longer MEG recordings of the resting state are preferable, previous experiments with childrenReference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Goldstein, Zagoory-Sharon and Feldman18,Reference Zeev-Wolf, Levy, Ebstein and Feldman84 have indicated that children are unable to stay still in isolated shielded environments for longer periods. Second, we did not conduct assessments of mothers and children between 6 and 10 years, which could have allowed for a more fine-grained clinical grouping. Third, the small number of children in the late childhood exposure group did not allow further division of this group into those exposed to chronic depression versus those experiencing only late depression, although our comparisons show no differences between these two subgroups on any study variable. Future research is needed to follow up on our findings with larger samples. It is important to note that large community cohorts followed from birth to preadolescence with repeated assessments of both mother and child, are rare at best, and all longitudinal studies of maternal depression involve highly heterogenous clinical samples. Our unique sample may be important in pinpointing specific factors across the first decade of life that may uniquely affect DMN consolidation in a time-sensitive manner. Future studies can build on these results and examine differential DMN connectivity patterns following early and later exposure to other adversities, including abuse, mass trauma and other parental psychopathology. The findings that early childhood exposure that later resolves leaves its mark on the brain in the form of early trauma, whereas later childhood exposure leads to adult-like aberrations, may help in the diagnosis and treatment of children of mothers with depression. Furthermore, implementing a ‘sensitive period’ in careful longitudinal brain research, and applying the findings toward intervention efforts, may assist in the development of more targeted, efficient interventions for children exposed to various forms of trauma and adversity at different stages of development.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, R.F., upon reasonable request.

Author contributions

M.Z.-W. and Y.D.-Z. contributed to data analysis, interpretation of data and drafting the manuscript, and approved the manuscript for publication. M.P. contributed to the conception of the study and data acquisition, and approved the manuscript for publication. A.G. contributed to the conception of the study and approved the manuscript for publication. R.F. oversaw the longitudinal studies, conceptualisation the study, contributed to data analysis, interpretation of data and writing the manuscript, and approved the manuscript for publication.

Funding

The study was supported by the Simms/Mann Foundation Chair (grant 001 to R.F.).

Declaration of interest

None.

Footnotes

*

Joint first authors.

References

Goodman, SH, Rouse, MH, Connell, AM, Broth, MR, Hall, CM, Heyward, D. Maternal depression and child psychopathology: a meta-analytic review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2011; 14: 127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halligan, SL, Murray, L, Martins, C, Cooper, PJ. Maternal depression and psychiatric outcomes in adolescent offspring: a 13-year longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 2007; 97(1–3): 145–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R, Granat, A, Pariente, C, Kanety, H, Kuint, J, Gilboa-Schechtman, E. Maternal depression and anxiety across the postpartum year and infant social engagement, fear regulation, and stress reactivity. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2009; 48(9): 919–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priel, A, Zeev-Wolf, M, Djalovski, A, Feldman, R. Maternal depression impairs child emotion understanding and executive functions: the role of dysregulated maternal care across the first decade of life. Emotion 2020; 20(6): 1042–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, M, Zeev-Wolf, M, Goldstein, A, Feldman, R. Exposure to early and persistent maternal depression impairs the neural basis of attachment in preadolescence. Prog Neuro Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2019; 93: 2130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomarken, AJ, Dichter, GS, Garber, J, Simien, C. Resting frontal brain activity: linkages to maternal depression and socio-economic status among adolescents. Biol Psychol 2004; 67(1–2): 77102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wen, DJ, Soe, NN, Sim, LW, Sanmugam, S, Kwek, K, Chong, Y-S, et al. Infant frontal EEG asymmetry in relation with postnatal maternal depression and parenting behavior. Transl Psychiatry 2017; 7(3): e1057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marino, C, Riva, V, Mornati, G, Piazza, C, del Giudice, R, Dionne, G, et al. Postnatal maternal symptoms of depression and child emotion dysregulation: the mediation role of infant EEG alpha asymmetry. Infant Behav Dev 2019; 57: 101321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusby, CM, Goodman, SH, Bell, MA, Newport, DJ. Electroencephalogram patterns in infants of depressed mothers. Dev Psychobiol 2014; 56: 459–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, SH, Liu, R, Lusby, CM, Park, JS, Bell, MA, Newport, DJ, et al. Consistency of EEG asymmetry patterns in infants of depressed mothers. Dev Psychobiol 2021; 63(4): 768–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, T, Fox, NA, Pickens, J, Nawrocki, T. Relative right frontal EEG activation in 3- to 6-month-old infants of “depressed” mothers. Dev Psychol 1995; 31: 358–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, NA, Field, T, Fox, NA, Lundy, B, Davalos, M. EEG activation in 1-month-old infants of depressed mothers. Dev Psychopathol 1997; 9(3): 491505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews-Hanna, JR. The brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation. Neurosci 2012; 18(3): 251–70.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, W, Mai, X, Liu, C. The default mode network and social understanding of others: what do brain connectivity studies tell us. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buckner, RL, Andrews-Hanna, JR, Schacter, DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008; 1124: 138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raichle, ME. The brain's default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 2015; 38(1): 433–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S, Ford, JM. Default mode network activity and connectivity in psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2012; 8(1): 4976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeev-Wolf, M, Levy, J, Goldstein, A, Zagoory-Sharon, O, Feldman, R. Chronic early stress impairs default mode network connectivity in preadolescents and their mothers. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2019; 4(1): 7280.Google ScholarPubMed
DiGangi, JA, Tadayyon, A, Fitzgerald, DA, Rabinak, CA, Kennedy, A, Klumpp, H, et al. Reduced default mode network connectivity following combat trauma. Neurosci Lett 2016; 615: 3743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluhm, RL, Williamson, PC, Osuch, EA, Frewen, PA, Stevens, TK, Boksman, K, et al. Alterations in default network connectivity in posttraumatic stress disorder related to early-life trauma. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2009; 34(3): 187–94.Google ScholarPubMed
Sripada, RK, Swain, JE, Evans, GW, Welsh, RC, Liberzon, I. Childhood poverty and stress reactivity are associated with aberrant functional connectivity in default mode network. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014; 39(9): 2244–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, DG, Conger, RD, Robins, RW, Hastings, PD, Guyer, AE. Income change alters default mode network connectivity for adolescents in poverty. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2018; 30: 93–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lanius, RA, Bluhm, RL, Coupland, NJ, Hegadoren, KM, Rowe, B, Théberge, J, et al. Default mode network connectivity as a predictor of post-traumatic stress disorder symptom severity in acutely traumatized subjects. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2010; 121(1): 3340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, JM, Sampaio, A, Marques, P, Ferreira, LM, Santos, NC, Marques, F, et al. Plasticity of resting state brain networks in recovery from stress. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soares, JM, Sampaio, A, Ferreira, LM, Santos, NC, Marques, P, Marques, F, et al. Stress impact on resting state brain networks. PLoS One 2013; 8(6): e66500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, AP, Block, SR, Sripada, RK, Rauch, S, Giardino, N, Favorite, T, et al. Altered default mode network (DMN) resting state functional connectivity following a mindfulness-based exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in combat veterans of Afghanistan and Iraq. Depress Anxiety 2016; 33(4): 289–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mars, RB, Neubert, FX, Noonan, MAP, Sallet, J, Toni, I, Rushworth, MFS. On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain”. Front Hum Neurosci 2012; 6: 189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, SJ, Kim, SE, Kim, HE, Han, K, Jeong, B, Kim, JJ, et al. Altered functional connectivity of the default mode network in low-empathy subjects. Yonsei Med J 2017; 58: 1061–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellucci, G, Hahn, T, Deshpande, G, Krueger, F. Functional connectivity of specific resting-state networks predicts trust and reciprocity in the trust game. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2019; 19(1): 165–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greicius, M, Flores, B, Menon, V, Glover, G. Resting-state functional connectivity in major depression: abnormally increased contributions from subgenual cingulate cortex and thalamus. Biological 2007; 62: 429–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Sheline, YI, Price, JL, Yan, Z, Mintun, MA. Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107: 11020–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, Y, Yu, C, Zheng, H, Liu, Y, Song, M, Qin, W, et al. Increased neural resources recruitment in the intrinsic organization in major depression. J Affect Disord 2010; 121: 220–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, BJ, Friston, K, Mody, M, Wang, HN, Lu, HB, Hu, DW. A brain network model for depression: from symptom understanding to disease intervention. CNS Neurosci Ther 2018; 24: 1004–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, HX, Chen, X, Shen, YQ, Li, L, Chen, NX, Zhu, ZC, et al. Rumination and the default mode network: meta-analysis of brain imaging studies and implications for depression. Neuroimage 2020; 206: 116287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, JP, Farmer, M, Fogelman, P, Gotlib, IH. Depressive rumination, the default-mode network, and the dark matter of clinical neuroscience. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 78: 224–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, T, Marwood, L, Perkins, AM, Herane-Vives, A, Joules, R, Lythgoe, DJ, et al. Instability of default mode network connectivity in major depression: a two-sample confirmation study. Transl Psychiatry 2017; 7(4): e1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, TC, Connolly, CG, Henje Blom, E, LeWinn, KZ, Strigo, IA, Paulus, MP, et al. Emotion-dependent functional connectivity of the default mode network in adolescent depression. Biol Psychiatry 2015; 78: 635–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, MG, Peltier, S, Nee, DE, Kross, E, Deldin, PJ, Jonides, J. Depression, rumination and the default network. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2011; 6: 548–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, W, Rolls, ET, Qiu, J, Xie, X, Wei, D, Huang, CC, et al. Increased functional connectivity of the posterior cingulate cortex with the lateral orbitofrontal cortex in depression. Transl Psychiatry 2018; 8: 90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liston, C, Chen, AC, Zebley, BD, Drysdale, AT, Gordon, R, Leuchter, B, et al. Default mode network mechanisms of transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression. Biol Psychiatry 2014; 76(7): 517–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, JR, Biazoli, CE, Salum, GA, Gadelha, A, Crossley, N, Satterthwaite, TD, et al. Temporal stability of network centrality in control and default mode networks: specific associations with externalizing psychopathology in children and adolescents. Hum Brain Mapp 2015; 36(12): 4926–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, AD, Jacobson, LA, Wexler, JL, Nebel, MB, Caffo, BS, Pekar, JJ, et al. Connectivity supporting attention in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neuroimage Clin 2015; 7: 6881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inuggi, A, Sanz-Arigita, E, González-Salinas, C, Valero-García A, V, García-Santos, JM, Fuentes, LJ. Brain functional connectivity changes in children that differ in impulsivity temperamental trait. Front Behav Neurosci 2014; 8: 156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, J, Yao, N, Fairchild, G, Cao, X, Zhang, Y, Xiang, YT, et al. Disrupted default mode network connectivity in male adolescents with conduct disorder. Brain Imaging Behav 2016; 10: 9951003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viard, A, Mutlu, J, Chanraud, S, Guenolé, F, Egler, PJ, Gérardin, P, et al. Altered default mode network connectivity in adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuroimage Clin 2019; 22: 101731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, AR, Barry, RJ, McCarthy, R, Selikowitz, M. Age and sex effects in the EEG: development of the normal child. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112(5): 806–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimesch, W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Rev 1999; 29(2–3): 169–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. Sensitive periods in human social development; new insights from research on oxytocin, synchrony, and high-risk parenting. Dev Psychopathol 2015; 27: 369–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hensch, TK. Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6(11): 877–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarro, EC, Wilson, DA, Sullivan, RM. Maternal regulation of infant brain state. Curr Biol 2014; 24(14): 1664–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curley, JP, Champagne, FA. Influence of maternal care on the developing brain: mechanisms, temporal dynamics and sensitive periods. Front Neuroendocrinol 2016; 40: 5266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashman, SB, Dawson, G. Maternal depression, infant psychobiological development, and risk for depression. In Children of Depressed Parents: Mechanisms of Risk and Implications for Treatment (eds SH Goodman, IH Gotlib): 3758. American Psychological Association, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konrad, K, Firk, C, Uhlhaas, PJ. Brain. development during adolescence: neuroscientific insights into this developmental period. Dtsch Ärzteblatt Int 2013; 110(25): 425–31.Google ScholarPubMed
Chechik, G, Meilijson, I, Ruppin, E. Neuronal regulation: a mechanism for synaptic pruning during brain maturation. Neural Comput 1999; 11(8): 2061–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhou, D, Lebel, C, Treit, S, Evans, A, Beaulieu, C. Accelerated longitudinal cortical thinning in adolescence. Neuroimage 2015; 104: 138–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, M, Goldstein, A, Feldman, R. Child brain exhibits a multi-rhythmic response to attachment cues. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2018; 13(9): 957–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richmond, S, Beare, R, Johnson, KA, Allen, NB, Seal, ML, Whittle, S. Towards understanding neurocognitive mechanisms of parenting: maternal behaviors and structural brain network organization in late childhood. Hum Brain Mapp 2021; 42(6): 1845–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dégeilh, F, Bernier, A, Leblanc, É, Daneault, V, Beauchamp, MH. Quality of maternal behaviour during infancy predicts functional connectivity between default mode network and salience network 9 years later. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2018; 34: 5362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, JG, Vrtička, P, Cui, X, Shrestha, S, Hosseini, SMH, Baker, JM, et al. Inter-brain synchrony in mother-child dyads during cooperation: an fNIRS hyperscanning study. Neuropsychologia 2019; 124: 117–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priel, A, Djalovski, A, Zagoory-Sharon, O, Feldman, R. Maternal depression impacts child psychopathology across the first decade of life: oxytocin and synchrony as markers of resilience. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2019; 60(1): 3042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vakrat, A, Apter-Levy, Y, Feldman, R. Fathering moderates the effects of maternal depression on the family process. Dev Psychopathol 2017; 30(1): 2738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulmer-Yaniv, A, Salomon, R, Waidergoren, S, Shimon-Raz, O, Djalovski, A, Feldman, R. Synchronous caregiving from birth to adulthood tunes humans’ social brain.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118: e2012900118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reniers, RLEP, Corcoran, R, Völlm, BA, Mashru, A, Howard, R, Liddle, PF. Moral decision-making, ToM, empathy and the default mode network. Biol Psychol 2012; 90(3): 202–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Ward, CH, Mendelson, M, Mock, J, Erbaugh, J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1961; 4: 561–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, CD, Gorsuch, RL, Lushene, RE. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970.Google Scholar
First, MB, Spitzer, RL, Gibbon, M, Williams, JBW. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Part I: description. J Pers Disord 1995; 9: 8391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, R, Ford, T, Richards, H, Gatward, R, Meltzer, H. The Development and Well-Being Assessment: description and initial validation of an integrated assessment of child and adolescent psychopathology. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000; 41(5): 645–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tal, I, Abeles, M. Cleaning MEG artifacts using external cues. J Neurosci Methods 2013; 217(1–2): 31–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oostenveld, R, Fries, P, Maris, E, Schoffelen, J-M. FieldTrip: open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011; 2011: 156869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Pasquale, F, Della Penna, S, Snyder, AZ, Marzetti, L, Pizzella, V, Romani, GL, et al. A cortical core for dynamic integration of functional networks in the resting human brain. Neuron 2012; 74(4): 753–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Veen, BD, van Drongelen, W, Yuchtman, M, Suzuki, A. Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1997; 44(9): 867–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lachaux, J-P, Rodriguez, E, Martinerie, J, Varela, FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brains signals. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8: 194208.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, TE, Holmes, AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp 2002; 15(1): 125.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M, Spitzer, R, Gibbon, M, Williams, J. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders-Clinician Version (SCID-CV). American Psychiatric Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Feldman, R. Parent-infant synchrony and the construction of shared timing; physiological precursors, developmental outcomes, and risk conditions. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2007; 48(3–4): 329–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. Bio-behavioral synchrony: a model for integrating biological and microsocial behavioral processes in the study of parenting. Parenting 2012; 12(2–3): 154–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, R. Social behavior as a transdiagnostic marker of resilience. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2021; 17(1): 153–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Apter-Levy, Y, Feldman, M, Vakart, A, Ebstein, RP, Feldman, R. Impact of maternal depression across the first 6 years of life on the child's mental health, social engagement, and empathy: the moderating role of oxytocin. Am J Psychiatry 2013; 170(10): 1161–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holm, S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 1979; 6(2): 6570.Google Scholar
Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apter-Levi, Y, Pratt, M, Vakart, A, Feldman, M, Zagoory-Sharon, O, Feldman, R. Maternal depression across the first years of life compromises child psychosocial adjustment; relations to child HPA-axis functioning. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2016; 64: 4756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldman, R. Mother-infant synchrony and the development of moral orientation in childhood and adolescence: direct and indirect mechanisms of developmental continuity. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2007; 77(4): 582–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rudie, JD, Shehzad, Z, Hernandez, LM, Colich, NL, Bookheimer, SY, Iacoboni, M, et al. Reduced functional integration and segregation of distributed neural systems underlying social and emotional information processing in autism spectrum disorders. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22(5): 1025–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeev-Wolf, M, Levy, J, Ebstein, RP, Feldman, R. Cumulative risk on oxytocin-pathway genes impairs default mode network connectivity in trauma-exposed youth. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11: 335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seghier, ML. The angular gyrus. Neurosci 2013; 19(1): 4361.Google ScholarPubMed
Goldin, PR, McRae, K, Ramel, W, Gross, JJ. The neural bases of emotion regulation: reappraisal and suppression of negative emotion. Biol Psychiatry 2008; 63(6): 577–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, W, Rolls, ET, Qiu, J, Yang, D, Ruan, H, Wei, D, et al. Functional connectivity of the precuneus in unmedicated patients with depression. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2018; 3(12): 1040–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Semple, WE, Goyer, PF, McCormick, R, Compton-Toth, B, Morris, E, Donovan, B, et al. Attention and regional cerebral blood flow in posttraumatic stress disorder patients with substance abuse histories. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 1996; 67(1): 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, J, Rao, H, Wetmore, GS, Furlan, PM, Korczykowski, M, Dinges, DF, et al. Perfusion functional MRI reveals cerebral blood flow pattern under psychological stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102(49): 17804–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G, Heinzel, A, de Greck, M, Bermpohl, F, Dobrowolny, H, Panksepp, J. Self-referential processing in our brain—a meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. Neuroimage 2006; 31(1): 440–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Meer, L, Costafreda, S, Aleman, A, David, AS. Self-reflection and the brain: a theoretical review and meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies with implications for schizophrenia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 935–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, CG, Pujol, J, Harrison, BJ. Mapping the self in the brain's default mode network. Neuroimage 2016; 132: 390–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Northoff, G, Bermpohl, F. Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8(3): 102–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, P, Northoff, G. How is our self related to midline regions and the default-mode network? Neuroimage 2011; 57(3): 12211233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fair, DA, Cohen, AL, Dosenbach, NUF, Church, JA, Miezin, FM, Barch, DM, et al. The maturing architecture of the brain's default network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105(10): 4028–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sato, JR, Salum, GA, Gadelha, A, Picon, FA, Pan, PM, Vieira, G, et al. Age effects on the default mode and control networks in typically developing children. J Psychiatr Res 2014; 58: 8995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherman, LE, Rudie, JD, Pfeifer, JH, Masten, CL, McNealy, K, Dapretto, M. Development of the default mode and central executive networks across early adolescence: a longitudinal study. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2014; 10: 148–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tozzi, L, Zhang, X, Chesnut, M, Holt-Gosselin, B, Ramirez, CA, Williams, LM. Reduced functional connectivity of default mode network subsystems in depression: meta-analytic evidence and relationship with trait rumination. Neuroimage Clin 2021; 30: 102570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheline, YI, Barch, DM, Price, JL, Rundle, MM, Vaishnavi, SN, Snyder, AZ, et al. The default mode network and self-referential processes in depression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(6): 1942–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essau, CA. The association between family factors and depressive disorders in adolescents. J Youth Adolesc 2004; 33(5): 365–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammen, CL. Children of depressed parents. In Handbook of Depression (2nd edn) (eds Gotlib, IH, Hammen, CL): 275–97. Guilford Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (a) An illustration of the theta frequency band (4–7 Hz). (b) The locations of the seven seeds of the default mode network (DMN; taken from 21). Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) seed coordinates (mm, Left-Posterior-Iinferior (LPI)) are as follows: right medial prefrontal cortex (RMPFC; 2, 53, 24); dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dMPFC; −13, 52, 23); ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vMPFC; −2, 51, 2); right angular gyrus (RAG; 51,−64, 32); left angular gyrus (LAG; −43,−76, 35); posterior cingulate cortex/praecuneus (PCC; −3, −54, 31) and left inferior temporal gyrus (LITG: −57, −25, −17). (c) Bar plot of averaged (over all 21 seed-pair connections) theta phase-lock values (PLV). Connectivity values between the different DMN nodes in children exposed to (d) early maternal depression (n = 13), (e) later maternal depression (n = 16) and (f) healthy controls (n = 45). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.005, P < 0.1. Error bars represent s.e.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 Default mode network (DMN) phase-lock value (PLV) connectivity differences between children exposed to early maternal depression (n = 13) (a and c) and later maternal depression (n = 16) (b and d), relative to healthy controls (n = 45). (a and b) All possible seed-pair DMN PLV connections, with black lines indicating non-significant connections, blue lines indicating connections weaker than controls and red lines indicating connections stronger than controls. (c and d) Strength of connectivity values between the different DMN nodes. Significant connections are marked by *. dMPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; LAG, left angular gyrus; LITG, left inferior temporal gyrus; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex/praecuneus; RAG, right angular gyrus; RMPFC, right medial prefrontal cortex; vMPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex.

Figure 2

Fig. 3 (a) Means, medians and 95% confidence intervals of mother intrusiveness at 9 months of age, mother–child reciprocity at 10 years of age, and child empathy at 10 years of age, for default mode network (DMN) mid-level connectivity (controls: n = 37) and DMN aberrant connectivity (n = 37) groups. (b) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of the gender/age variables (blue) compared with a model also including intrusiveness (red), and a model also including reciprocity and empathy variables (green). Reference line (orange) denotes chance-alone classification level.

Figure 3

Table 1 Hierarchical logistic regression results for step 3 model

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.