Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T23:36:38.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Survey of Common Waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) Response to Protox- and ALS-Inhibiting Herbicides in Northeast Kansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jeanne S. Falk ,
Douglas E. Shoup ,
Kassim Al-Khatib  and
Dallas E. Peterson
Jeanne S. Falk
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
Douglas E. Shoup
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
Kassim Al-Khatib*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
Dallas E. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: khatib@ksu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A population of common waterhemp in northeast Kansas was confirmed resistant to protoporphyrinogen oxidase (protox)-inhibiting herbicides in 2001. In 2002, seeds were collected from 28 sites in a 16-km radius surrounding the site where resistance was confirmed to determine the extent of protox resistance in common waterhemp populations throughout the area. In addition, common waterhemp response to acetolactate synthase (ALS)-inhibiting herbicides and glyphosate was determined. At least one common waterhemp plant among the 48 plants tested from each of 10 sites was acifluorfen-resistant. These sites were randomly scattered throughout the sampling area, and resistance may have resulted from seed or pollen movement or independent development. Acifluorfen-resistant common waterhemp plants were initially injured by acifluorfen, but plants began recovering from injury within 14 days after treatment (DAT). All sites contained at least two common waterhemp plants with imazethapyr resistance, whereas plants from all sites were susceptible to glyphosate. Because acifluorfen- and imazethapyr-resistant common waterhemp populations are found in northeastern Kansas, protox-inhibiting and ALS-inhibiting herbicides may not provide common waterhemp control.

Keywords

acifluorfen-methylglyphosateimazethapyrcommon waterhemp, Amaranthus rudis Sauer, # AMATAHerbicide resistanceALS, acetolactate synthase [E.C. 2.2.1.6]DAT, days after treatmentprotox, protoporphyrinogen oxidase [E.C. 1.3.3.4]
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 838 - 846
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allison, P. D. 1999. Logistic regression using the SAS system: theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc. Pp. 5–78.Google Scholar
Anderson, D. D., Roeth, F. W., and Martin, A. R. 1996. Occurrence and control of triazine-resistant common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 10:570–575.Google Scholar
Andrews, T. S., Morrison, I. N., and Penner, G. A. 1998. Monitoring the spread of ACCase inhibitor resistance among wild oat (Avena fatua) patches using AFLP analysis. Weed Sci. 46:196–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, D. M. and Rieseberg, L. H. 1994. Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89:655–660.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, J. R., Al-Khatib, K., and Currie, R. S. 1999. Survey of common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) resistance to imazethapyr and chlorimuron in northeast Kansas. Weed Technol. 13:510–514.Google Scholar
Becerril, J. M. and Duke, S. O. 1989. Protoporphyrin IX content correlates with activity of photobleaching herbicides. Plant Physiol. 90:1175–1181.Google Scholar
Bensch, C. N., Horak, M. J., and Peterson, D. E. 2003. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:37–43.Google Scholar
Feltner, K. C., Hurst, H. R., and Anderson, L. E. 1969. Tall waterhemp competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 17:214–216.Google Scholar
Foes, M. J., Liu, L., Tranel, P. J., Wax, L. M., and Stoller, E. W. 1998. A biotype of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistant to triazine and ALS herbicides. Weed Sci. 46:515–520.Google Scholar
Franssen, A. S., Skinner, D. Z., Al-Khatib, K., Horak, M. J., and Kulakow, P. A. 2001. Interspecific hybridization and gene flow of ALS resistance in Amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 49:598–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horak, M. J. and Peterson, D. E. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192–195.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. M., Jacobs, N. J., Sherman, T. D., and Duke, S. O. 1991. Effect of diphenyl ether herbicides on oxidation of protoporphyrinogen to protoporphyrin in organellar and plasma membrane enriched fractions of barley. Plant Physiol. 97:197–203.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. M. and Jacobs, N. J. 1993. Porphyrin accumulation and export by isolated barley (Hordeum vulgare) plastids. Plant Physiol. 101:1181–1187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klinger, T., Elam, D. R., and Ellstrand, N. C. 1991. Radish as a model system for study of engineered gene escape rates via crop-weed mating. Conserv. Biol. 5:531–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehnen, L. P., Sherman, T. D., Becerril, J. M., and Duke, S. O. 1990. Tissue and cellular localization of acifluorfen-induced porphyrins in cucumber cotyledons. Pest. Biochem. Phys. 37:239–248.Google Scholar
Li, J., Smeda, R. J., Nelson, K. A., and Dayan, F. E. 2004. Physiological basis for resistance to diphenyl ether herbicides in common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis). Weed Sci. 52:333–338.Google Scholar
Marshall, M. W., Al-Khatib, K., and Loughin, T. 2001. Gene flow, growth, and competitiveness of imazethapyr-resistant common sunflower. Weed Sci. 49:14–21.Google Scholar
Massinga, R. A., Al-Khatib, K., St. Amand, P., and Miller, J. F. 2003. Gene flow from imidazolinone-resistant domesticated sunflower to wild relatives. Weed Sci. 51:854–862.Google Scholar
Matringe, M., Camadro, J., Labette, P., and Scalla, R. 1989. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase as a molecular target for diphenyl ether herbicides. Biochem. J. 260:231–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, B. D. and Mortimer, A. M. 1994. Selection for herbicide resistance. in Powles, S. B. and Holtum, J. A. M., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants: Biology and Biochemistry. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers. Pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Patzoldt, W. L., Hager, A. G., and Tranel, P. J. 2002. An Illinois waterhemp biotype with resistance to PPO, ALS, and PSII Inhibitors. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 57:161.Google Scholar
Patzoldt, W. L., Hager, A. G., and Tranel, P. J. 2003. Molecular characterization of the gene encoding protoporphyrinogen oxidase from waterhemp. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:30.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. E. 1999. The impact of herbicide-resistant weeds on Kansas agriculture. Weed Technol. 13:632–635.Google Scholar
Pratt, D. B. and Clark, L. G. 2001. Amaranthus rudis and A. tuberculatus— one species or two? J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 128:282–296.Google Scholar
Ross, M. A. and Lembi, C. A. 1985. Applied Weed Science. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company, and London: Collier Macmillan Publishers. P. 9.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1955. Revision of the dioecious amaranths. Madrono 13:5–46.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1957. Recent migration and evolution of the dioecious amaranths. Evolution 11:11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1972. The dioecious amaranths: a new species name and major range extensions. Madrono 21:426–434.Google Scholar
Shoup, D. E., Al-Khatib, K., and Peterson, D. E. 2003. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) resistance to protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 51:145–150.Google Scholar
Streckel, L. E. and Sprague, C. L. 2004. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in corn. Weed Sci. 52:359–364.Google Scholar
Tranel, P. J. and Wright, T. R. 2002. Resistance of weeds to ALS-inhibiting herbicides: what have we learned? Weed Sci. 50:700–712.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. National Agriculture Statistics Service. 2003. Agriculture chemical usage 2002 field crops summary. Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/agcs0503.pdf. Accessed January 20, 2003.Google Scholar
Wetzel, D. K., Horak, M. J., Skinner, D. Z., and Kulakow, P. A. 1999. Transferal of herbicide resistance traits from Amaranthus palmeri to Amaranthus rudis . Weed Sci. 47:538–543.Google Scholar
Witkowski, D. A. and Halling, B. P. 1989. Inhibition of plant protoporphyrinogen oxidase by herbicide acifluorfen-methyl. Plant Physiol. 90:1239–1242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed