Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Sensitivity of dry edible bean to dicamba and 2,4-D

  • Scott R. Bales (a1) and Christy L. Sprague (a2)

Abstract

Dicamba and 2,4-D exposure to sensitive crops, such as dry bean, is of great concern with the recent registrations of dicamba- and 2,4-D–resistant soybean. In 2017 and 2018, field experiments were conducted at two Michigan locations to understand how multiple factors, including dry bean market class, herbicide rate, and application timing, influence dry bean response to dicamba and 2,4-D. Dicamba and 2,4-D at rates of 0.1%, 1%, and 10% of the field use rate for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were applied to V2 and V8 black and navy bean. Field-use rates for dicamba and 2,4-D choline were 560 and 1,120 g ae ha−1, respectively. There were few differences between market classes or application timings when dry bean was exposed to dicamba or 2,4-D. Estimated rates to cause 20% dry bean injury 14 d after treatment were 4.5 and 107.5 g ae ha−1 for dicamba and 2,4-D, respectively. When dicamba was applied at 56 g ae ha−1, light interception was reduced up to 51% and maturity was delayed up to 16 d. Although both herbicides caused high levels of injury to dry bean, yield reductions were not consistently observed. At four site-years, 2,4-D did not reduce dry bean yield or seed weight with any rate tested. However, when averaged over site-years, dicamba rates of 3.7, 9.8 and 17.9 g ae ha−1 were estimated to cause 5%, 10%, and 15% yield loss, respectively. Dicamba also reduced seed weight by 10% when 56 g ae ha−1 was applied. However, the germination of harvested seed was not affected by dicamba or 2,4-D. Long delays in dry bean maturity from dicamba injury can also indirectly increase losses in yield and quality due to harvestability issues. This work further stresses the need for caution when using dicamba or 2,4-D herbicides near sensitive crops.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Author for correspondence: Christy Sprague, Department of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, 1066 Bogue Street, East Lansing, MI 48824. Email: sprague1@msu.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

Associate Editor: Mark VanGessel, University of Delaware

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alves, GS, Kruger, GR, da Cunha, JPA, Vieira, BC, Henry, RS, Obradovic, A, Grujic, M (2017) Spray drift from dicamba and glyphosate applications in a wind tunnel. Weed Technol 31:387395
Andersen, SM, Clay, SA, Wrage, LJ, Matthees, D (2004) Soybean foliage residues of dicamba and 2,4-D and correlation to application rates and yield. Agron J 96:750760
Auch, D, Arnold, W (1978) Dicamba use and injury on soybeans (Glycine max) in South Dakota. Weed Sci 26:471475
Behrens, MR, Mutlu, N, Chakraborty, S, Dumitru, R, Jiang, W Z, LaVallee, BJ, Weeks, DP (2007) Dicamba resistance: enlarging and preserving biotechnology-based weed management strategies. Science 316:11851188
Behrens, R, Lueschen, W (1979) Dicamba volatility. Weed Sci 27:486493
Blackshaw, RE, Molnar, LJ, Muendel, HH, Saindon, G, Li, X (2000) Integration of cropping practices and herbicides improves weed management in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol 14:327336
Boerboom, C (2004) Field case studies of dicamba movement to soybeans. In Wisconsin Crop Management Conference: 2004 Proceedings Papers. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Burgoyne, TW, Hites, RA (1993) Effect of temperature and wind direction on the atmospheric concentrations of alpha-endosulfan. Environ Sci Technol 27:910914
Byker, HP, Soltani, N, Robinson, DE, Tardif, FJ, Lawton, MB, Sikkema, PH (2013) Control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with dicamba applied preplant and postemergence in dicamba-resistant soybean. Weed Technol 27:492496
Craigmyle, BD, Ellis, JM, Bradley, KW (2013) Influence of herbicide programs on weed management in soybean with resistance to glufosinate and 2,4-D. Weed Technol 27:7884
Cundiff, GT, Reynolds, DB, Mueller, TC (2017) Evaluation of dicamba persistence among various agricultural hose types and cleanout procedures using soybean (Glycine max) as a bio-indicator. Weed Sci 65:305316
Dexter, AG (1993) Herbicide spray drift. North Dakota State University Extension Bulletin A-657. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University
Fageria, NK, Santos, AB (2008) Yield physiology of dry bean. J Plant Nutr 31:9831004
Grossman, K (2003) Mediation of herbicide effects by hormone interactions. J Plant Growth Regul 22:209–122
Hatterman-Valenti, H, Endres, G, Jenks, B, Ostlie, M, Reinhardt, T, Robinson, A, Stenger, J, Zollinger, R (2017) Defining glyphosate and dicamba drift injury to dry edible pea, dry edible bean, and potato. HortTechnol 27:502509
Hillger, DE, Qin, K, Simpson, D, Havens, P (2012) Reduction in drift and volatility of EnlistTM Duo with Colex-D. Page 31 in Proceedings of the 65th Annual Meeting of the North Central Weed Science Society Conference Proceedings.
Holmes, RC, Sprague, CL (2013) Row width affects weed management in type II black bean. Weed Technol 27:538546
Kelly, JD, Cichy, KA (2013) Dry bean breeding and production technologies. Pages 2354 in Siddiq, M, Uebersax, M, eds. Dry Beans and Pulses Production, Processing and Nutrition. Ames, IA: John Wiley & Sons
Knezevic, SZ, Streibig, JC, Ritz, C (2007) Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol 21:840848
Kniss, AR (2018) Soybean response to dicamba: a meta-analysis. Weed Technol 32:507512
Kruger, GR, Davis, VM, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG (2010) Control of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with growth regulator herbicides. Weed Technol 24:425429
Lyon, DJ, Wilson, RG (1986) Sensitivity of fieldbeans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to reduced rates of 2, 4-D and dicamba. Weed Sci 34:953956
Mallory-Smith, CA, Retzinger, JE (2003) Revised classification of herbicides by site of action for weed resistance management strategies. Weed Technol 17:605619
Maybank, J, Yoshida, K, Grover, R (1978) Spray drift from agricultural pesticide applications. J Air Pollution Control Assoc 28:10091014
Nordby, A, Skuterud, R (1974). The effects of boom height, working pressure and wind speed on spray drift. Weed Res 14:385395
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108113
Osborne, PP, Xu, Z, Swanson, KD, Walker, T, Farmer, DK (2015) Dicamba and 2, 4-D residues following applicator cleanout: a potential point source to the environment and worker exposure. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 65:11531158
Peterson, MA, McMaster, SA, Riechers, DE, Skelton, J (2016) 2,4-D Past, present and future: a review. Weed Technol 30:303345
Robinson, AP, Simpson, DM, Johnson, WG (2013) Response of glyphosate-tolerant soybean yield components to dicamba exposure. Weed Sci 61:526536
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 207335
Spaunhorst, DJ, Siefert-Higgins, S, Bradley, KW (2014) Glyphosate-resistant giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida) and waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) management in dicamba-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 28:131141
Sterling, TM, Hall, JC (1997) Mechanism of action of natural auxins and the auxinic herbicides. Pages 111141 in: Roe, RM, et al., eds. Herbicide Activity: Toxicology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: IOS Press
Thistle, HW (2004) Meteorological concepts in the drift of pesticides. Pages 156–162 in Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticide Application. October 27–29, Waikola, HI
[USDA-NASS] US Department of Agriculture (2018) Quick stats. https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/results/BD70E5AE-8384-3B19-9B5F-01A972736DFC. Accessed: August 18, 2018
Wax, LM, Knuth, LA, Slife, FW (1969) Response of soybeans to 2, 4-D, dicamba, and picloram. Weed Sci 17:388393
Weidenhamer, JD, Triplett, GB, Sobotka, FE (1989) Dicamba injury to soybean. Agron J 81:637643
Wolf, TM, Grover, R, Wallace, K (1993) Effect of protective shields on drift and deposition characteristics of field sprayers. Can J Plant Sci 73:12611273
Wright, TR, Shan, G, Walsh, TA, Lira, JM, Cui, C, Song, P, Zhuang, M, Arnold, NL, Lin, G, Yau, K, Russel, SM, Cicchillo, RM, Peterson, MA, Simpson, DM, Zhou, N, Ponsamuel, J, Zhang, Z (2010) Robust crop resistance to broadleaf and grass herbicides provided by aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenase transgenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(47):2024020245

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Sensitivity of dry edible bean to dicamba and 2,4-D

  • Scott R. Bales (a1) and Christy L. Sprague (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.