Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T00:03:17.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance of Enlist™ (AAD-12) Cotton to Glufosinate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

L. Bo Braxton ,
John S. Richburg ,
Alan C. York ,
A. Stanley Culpepper ,
Robert A. Haygood ,
Michael L. Lovelace ,
D. Hunter Perry  and
Larry C. Walton
L. Bo Braxton*
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
John S. Richburg
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Alan C. York
Affiliation:
William Neal Reynolds Professor Emeritus, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
A. Stanley Culpepper
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31794
Robert A. Haygood
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Michael L. Lovelace
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
D. Hunter Perry
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
Larry C. Walton
Affiliation:
Research Scientists, Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN 46268
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: lbraxton@dow.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Enlist™ cotton contains the aad-12 and pat genes that confer resistance to 2,4-D and glufosinate, respectively. Thirty-three field trials were conducted focused on Enlist cotton injury from glufosinate as affected by cotton growth stage, application rate, and single or sequential applications. Maximum injury from a single application of typical 1X (542 g ae ha-1) and 2X use rates was 3 and 13%, respectively, regardless of growth stage. Injury from sequential applications of 1X or 2X rates was equivalent to single applications. Similar injury was observed with four commercial formulations of glufosinate. Cotton yield was never affected by glufosinate. This research demonstrates Enlist™ cotton has robust resistance to glufosinate at rates at least twice the typical use rate when applied once or twice at growth stages ranging from 2 to 12 leaves.

Keywords

Glufosinate2,4-Dcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Aryloxyalkanoate dioxygenaseDAS-81910-7herbicide-resistant cropsphosphinothricin acetyltransferase.
Type
Note
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , June 2017 , pp. 380 - 386
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Daniel Stephenson, Louisana State University Agricultural Center.

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2016) Liberty 280 SL herbicide product label. Bayer CropScience Publication No. US84473405C 160222C 04/16. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. 25 pGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ (2014) Herbicide resistance in weeds and crops: challenges and opportunities. Pages 347–364 in Chauhan BS, Mahajan G. eds. Recent Advances in Weed Management. New York: Springer CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Box, GEP, Cox, DR (1964) An analysis of transformations. J Royal Stat Soc, Series B 26:211–252 Google Scholar
Burgos, NR, Scott, BC, Nichols, RL (2015) Tolerance profiles and mechanism of tolerance to glufosinate in Palmer amaranth from Arkansas. Page 25 in Proceedings of the 2015 Southern Weed Science Society annual meeting. Savannah, GA: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Cahoon, CW, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Seagroves, RW (2015) Cotton response and Palmer amaranth control with mixtures of glufosinate and residual herbicides. J Cotton Sci 19:622–630 Google Scholar
Chahal, GS, Johnson, WG (2012) Influence of glyphosate or glufosinate combinations with growth regulator herbicides and other agrochemicals in controlling glyphosate-resistant weeds. Weed Technol 26:638–643 Google Scholar
Corbett, JL, Askew, SD, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2004) Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol 18:443–453 Google Scholar
Craigmyle, BD, Ellis, JM, Bradley, KW (2013) Influence of herbicide programs on weed management in soybean with resistance to glufosinate and 2,4-D. Weed Technol 27:78–84 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS (2016) Weed management in cotton. Pages 90–144 in Georgia Cotton Production Guide. CSS-15-01. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service. http://www.ugacotton.com/vault/file/2016-UGA-Cotton-Production-Guide.pdf. Accessed October 8, 2016Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Webster, TM, Sosnoskie, LM, York, AC (2010) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in the United States. Pages 195–212 in Nandula VK, ed. Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1997) Weed management in no-tillage bromoxynil-tolerant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 11:335–345 Google Scholar
Diggle, AJ, Neve, PB, Smith, FP (2003) Herbicides used in combination can reduce the probability of herbicide resistance in finite weed populations. Weed Res 43:371–382 Google Scholar
Dodds, DM, Main, CL, Barber, LT, Burmester, C, Collins, GD, Edmisten, K, Stephenson, DO 4th, Whitaker, JR, Boykin, DL (2015) Response of LibertyLink and WideStrike cotton to varying rates of glufosinate. Weed Technol 29:665–674 Google Scholar
Duke, SO (2012) Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Manage Sci 68:505–512 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunnett, CW (1955) A multicomparisons procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. J Am Stat Assoc 50:1096–1121 Google Scholar
Everman, WJ, Clewis, SB, York, AC, Wilcut, JW (2009) Weed control and yield with flumioxazin, fomesafen, and S-metolachlor systems for glufosinate-resistant cotton residual weed management. Weed Technol 23:391–397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frans, RE, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society Google Scholar
Gardner, AP, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Monks, DW (2006) Management of annual grasses and Amaranthus spp. in glufosinate-resistant cotton. J Cotton Sci 10:328–338 Google Scholar
Green, JM (2012) The benefits of herbicide-resistant crops. Pest Manage Sci 68:1323–1331 Google Scholar
Green, JM, Owen, MDK (2011) Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J Agric Food Chem 59:5819–5829 Google Scholar
Hay, JV (1999) Herbicide discovery in the 21st century - a look into the crystal ball. Pages 55–65 in Brook GT, Roberts TR, eds. Pesticide Chemistry and Bioscience. The Food-Environment Challenge. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2016) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed October 7, 2016Google Scholar
Irby, JT, Dodds, DM, Reynolds, DB, Main, CL, Barber, LT, Smith, KL, Stewart, AM (2013) Evaluation of GlyTol™ and GlyTol™ + LibertyLink® cotton in the Mid-South. J Cotton Sci 17:131–139 Google Scholar
Jalaludin, A, Yu, Q, Powles, SB (2015) Multiple resistance across glufosinate, glyphosate, paraquat and ACCase-inhibiting herbicides in an Eleusine indica population. Weed Res 55:82–89 Google Scholar
Johnson, B, Young, B, Matthews, J, Marquardt, P, Slack, C, Bradley, K, York, A, Culpepper, S, Hager, A, Al-Khatib, K, Steckel, L, Moechnig, M, Loux, M, Bernards, M, Smeda, R (2010) Weed control in dicamba-resistant soybeans. Crop Manag. doi: 10.1094/CM-2010-0920-01-RS. Accessed October 16, 2016Google Scholar
Keeling, JW, Siders, KT, Abernathy, JR (1991) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in a conservation tillage system for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 5:137–141 Google Scholar
Merchant, RM, Culpepper, AS, Eure, PM, Richburg, JS, Braxton, LB (2014) Controlling glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in cotton with resistance to glyphosate, 2,4-D, and glufosinate. Weed Technol 28:291–297 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, RM, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, Steckel, LE, York, AC, Braxton, LB, Ford, JC (2013) Weed response to 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and dicamba applied alone or with glufosinate. J Cotton Sci 17:212–218 Google Scholar
Poirier, AH, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Chandi, A, Everman, WJ, Whitaker, JR (2014) Distribution of glyphosate- and thifensulfuron-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in North Carolina. Int J Agron. doi: 10,1155/2014/747810 Google Scholar
Powles, SB, Preston, C, Bryan, IB, Jutsum, AR (1997) Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Adv Agron 58:57–93 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM (2011) Herbicide programs for enhanced glyphosate-resistant and glufosinate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 25:526–534 Google Scholar
Richburg, JS, Braxton, B, Haygood, BB, Huckaba, R, Lovelace, M, Perry, DH, Thompson, GD, Viator, R, Walton, LL (2015) Tolerance of Enlist cotton to Enlist Duo, 2,4-D choline and glufosinate: a multi-year research summary. Page 269 in Proceedings of the 2015 Southern Weed Science Society Annual Meeting. Savannah, GA: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS (2014) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) increases herbicide use, tillage, and hand-weeding in Georgia cotton. Weed Sci 62:393–402 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Kichler, JM, Wallace, RD, Culpepper, AS (2011) Multiple resistance in Palmer amaranth to glyphosate and pyrithiobac confirmed in Georgia. Weed Technol 59:321–325 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Craig, CC, Hayes, RM (2006) Glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control with glufosinate prior to planting no-till cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 20:1047–1051 Google Scholar
Sweeney, JA, Jones, MA (2014) Glufosinate tolerance of multiple WideStrike and Liberty-Link cotton (Gosspyium hirsutum L.) cultivars. Crop Sci 55:403–410 Google Scholar
[USDA-APHIS] US Department of Agriculture–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2013) Dow AgroSciences Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Herbicide Tolerant DAS-8191Ø-7 Cotton. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/aphisdocs/13_26201p.pdf. Accessed October 11, 2016Google Scholar
[USFDA] US Food and Drug Administration (2014) Biotechnology Consultation Note to the File BNF No. 000142. http://www.fda.gov/Food/FoodScienceResearch/GEPlants/Submissions/UCM427610. Accessed October 11, 2016Google Scholar
Wallace, RD, Sosnoskie, LM, Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Edmisten, KL, Patterson, MG, Jones, MA, Crooks, HL, Cloud, GL, Pierson, J (2011) Tolerance of GlyTol® and GlyTol® + LibertyLink® cotton to glyphosate and glufosinate in the southeastern U. S. J Cotton Sci 15:80–88 Google Scholar
Ward, SM, Webster, TM, Steckel, LE (2013) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Technol 27:12–27 Google Scholar
Whitaker, JR, York, AC, Jordan, DL, Culpepper, AS (2011) Weed management with glyphosate- and glufosinate-based systems in PHY 485 WRF cotton. Weed Technol 25:183–191 Google Scholar
Wilson, DG Jr, York, AC, Jordan, DL (2007) Effect of row spacing on weed management in glufosinate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol 21:489–495 Google Scholar
Wilson, RG, Young, BG, Matthews, JL, Weller, SC, Johnson, WG, Jordan, DL, Owen, MDK, Dixon, PM, Shaw, DR (2011) Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant cropping systems in the United States. Part 4: Weed management practices and effects on weed populations and soil seed banks. Pest Manag Sci 67:771–780 Google Scholar
York, AC (2016) Weed Management in Cotton. 2016 Cotton Information. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service Publ. AG-417. Pp 84–129 Google Scholar