Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:59:36.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phytotoxic Response and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max) Varieties Treated with Sulfentrazone or Flumioxazin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah Taylor-Lovell ,
Loyd M. Wax  and
Randall Nelson
Sarah Taylor-Lovell*
Affiliation:
Dow AgroSciences, Lorimor, IA 50149
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
Invasive Weed Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS
Randall Nelson
Affiliation:
Soybean/Maize Germplasm, Pathology Genetics Research Unit USDA-ARS, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: staylor-lovell@dowagro.com.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Flumioxazin and sulfentrazone were compared for phytotoxicity on 15 soybean varieties in a greenhouse study and four varieties in the field. In the greenhouse, injury from sulfentrazone was greater overall than with flumioxazin, 10% compared with 1%, respectively, when averaged across varieties at the labeled rates. The varieties P9552, P91B01, P9362, and P9305 were more sensitive to sulfentrazone than the 11 other varieties on the basis of visible injury and plant height reductions. Sulfentrazone at 224 g ai/ha (1× rate) reduced plant height 23 to 53% and caused 18 to 38% visible injury on the four sensitive varieties. Visible injury symptoms consisted of stunting, crinkling of leaves, and chlorotic spots. Varieties P9305, P9306, P9352, and P9362 were compared in a field study with flumioxazin at 105, 210, and 420 g ai/ha or sulfentrazone at 224, 448, and 896 g ai/ha, corresponding to 1, 2, and 4× labeled rates. An untreated control of each variety was included for comparison. Contrary to the results of the greenhouse studies, injury from flumioxazin was similar to that from sulfentrazone in the field experiments. In 1998, emergence counts were reduced 19 to 52% with flumioxazin and 27 to 73% with sulfentrazone at the 1× rate. Visible injury and stand count reductions resulting from both herbicides were also apparent in that year. Emergence count reductions, stand count reductions, and visible injury resulting from the herbicides were less severe in 1999. At the 1× rate of each herbicide, yields were not affect in either year, except P9305 treated with sulfentrazone in 1999. At the 4× rate, P9305 was most sensitive to sulfentrazone, as indicated by a 53 and 23% reduction yield in 1998 and 1999, respectively. Avoidance of sensitive varieties will reduce the potential for injury and yield reduction with sulfentrazone, and maybe flumioxazin.

Keywords

Flumioxazin, 2-[7-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-3-oxo-4-(2-propynl)-2H-1,4 benzoxazin-6-yl[-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-isoindole-1,3(2H)-dionesulfentrazone, N-[2,4-dichloro-5-[4-(difluoromethyl)-4,5-dihydro-3-methyl-5-oxo-1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl]phenyl] methanesulfonamidesoybean, Glycine max (L.)Protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitorsdifferential herbicide toleranceDAE, days after emergenceDAP, days after plantingDAT, days after treatmentPPO, protoporphyrinogen oxidasePRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 95 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Dayan, F. E. and Duke, S. O. 1996. Porphyrin-generating herbicides. Pestic. Outlook 7: 22–27.Google Scholar
Dayan, F. E., Weete, J. D., Duke, S. O., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar differences in response to sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45: 634–641.Google Scholar
Devlin, R. M. and Zbiec, I. I. 1993. Effect of four safeners against herbicidal activity of V-53482 in corn (Zea mays). Plant Growth Reg. Soc. Am. Q. 21: 190–197.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45: 733–738.Google Scholar
Hagood, E. S. Jr., Williams, J. L. Jr. and Bauman, T. T. 1980. Influence of herbicide injury on the yield potential of soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 28: 40–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulting, A. G., Wax, L. M., and Simmons, F. W. 1997. Tolerance levels of soybean cultivars to sulfentrazone. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 52: 37.Google Scholar
Karazawa, M. and Caviness, C. E. 1977. Inheritance of resistance to herbicide (propanil) injury in soybeans. Agron. Abstr. p. 61.Google Scholar
Li, Z., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G., and Hancock, H. G. 1999. Use of seedling growth parameters to classify soybean (Glycine max) cultivar sensitivity to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 13: 530–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. E., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 27: 267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moshier, L. J. and Russ, O. G. 1981. Metribuzin injury in soybeans as influenced by application timing and cultivation. Agron. J. 73: 677–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, D., Swantek, J., and Castillo, T. 1997. Soybean cultivar susceptibility to sulfentrazone. Arkansas Crop Prot. Assoc., Abstr. Res. Conf. Vol. I, Fayetteville, AR.Google Scholar
Pioneer. 1998. Soybean Herbicide Variety Management Guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Des Moines, IA.Google Scholar
Sakaki, M., Sato, R., Haga, T., Nagano, E., Oshio, H., and Kamoshita, K. 1991. Herbicidal efficacy of S-53482 and factors affecting the phytotoxicity and the efficacy. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 34:12.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M., Sneller, C. H., and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance. Weed Sci. 46: 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, R. E., Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., Johnson, D. H., Wichert, R. A., Kendig, J. A., Ruff, D. F., and McCarty, J. T. 1990. Field screening of new chemicals for herbicidal activity, 1989. Res. Series Arkansas Agric. Exp. Sta. 395:22.Google Scholar
Valent. 1998. Valor Herbicide Technical Information Bulletin. Valent U.S.A. Corp, P.O. Box 8025, Walnut Creek, CA 94596-8025.Google Scholar
Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68: 484–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Walker, R. H., Grey, T. L., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Response of purple (Cyperus rotundus and yellow nutsedges (C. esculentus) to selective placement of sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45: 382–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, R., Sakaki, M., Sato, R., Haga, T., Nagano, E., Oshio, H., and Kamoshita, K. 1991. S-53482: A new N-phenyl phthalimide herbicide. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.: Weeds, Vol. 1, pp. 69–75.Google Scholar