Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Influence of Row Spacing and Residual Herbicides on Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

  • Justin L. Norris (a1), David R. Shaw (a1) and Charles E. Snipes (a2)

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two locations in Mississippi to determine weed control efficacy of postemergence soybean herbicides alone or following pendimethalin + imazaquin preemergence in glufosinate-tolerant soybean planted in 38- or 76-cm rows. Glufosinate applications controlled pitted morningglory better than conventional herbicide treatments, regardless of row spacing. Pendimethalin + imazaquin did not increase the efficacy of glufosinate on pitted morningglory. Pitted morningglory control was increased in narrow rows when compared to wide rows with all treatments. Sicklepod control ranged from 90 to 100% in narrow rows with glufosinate, regardless of rate. Residual herbicides alone controlled sicklepod 54%, regardless of row spacing. With grass species, two applications of 420 g ai/ha glufosinate controlled weeds 82 to 100%. Residual herbicides followed by 420 g/ha glufosinate controlled grass species 80% or more, regardless of row spacing. Hemp sesbania control ranged from 80 to 92% in 76- and 38-cm rows with one application of 560 g/ha glufosinate. Glufosinate at 420 g/ha used as sequential applications controlled hemp sesbania better than the conventional treatment in 76-cm rows. Residual herbicides in combination with glufosinate did not increase hemp sesbania control. There were no differences in yield due to row spacing at Stoneville in either year due to extremely dry growing conditions during pod set. At Starkville, two applications of 420 g/ha glufosinate resulted in higher yields than pendimethalin + imazaquin followed by 420 g/ha glufosinate in both years. Pendimethalin + imazaquin followed by 420 g/ha glufosinate increased yield in narrow rows compared to wide rows at Starkville in 1998.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: dshaw@weedscience.msstate.edu.

References

Hide All
Askew, S. D., Shaw, D. R., and Arnold, J. C. 1997. Weed control in Liberty-Link soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:59.
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-till soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 642647.
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 1999. Weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 13: 324333.
Earnest, L. D., Webster, E. P., and Hooks, G. G. 1998. Systems for weed control in Liberty tolerant corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:261.
Devine, M. D., Duke, S. O., and Fedtke, C. 1993. Inhibition of amino acid biosynthesis. In Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. pp. 251291.
Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., and Toler, J. E. 1991. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control with non-selective herbicides. Weed Technol. 5: 884886.
Hinchee, M. A. W., Padgette, S. R., Kishore, G. M., Delannay, X., and Fraley, R. T. 1993. Herbicide-tolerant crops. In Kung, S. and Wu, R., eds. Transgenic Plants. Volume 1. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp. 243263.
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1995. Non-selective and selective herbicide combinations in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 9: 158165.
Lanie, A. J., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1994. Herbicide combinations for soybean (Glycine max) planted in stale seedbed. Weed Technol. 8: 1722.
Lyon, B. R. 1991. Engineering microbial herbicide detoxification genes in higher plants. In Dennis, E. S. and Llewellyn, D. J., eds. Molecular Approaches to Crop Improvement. Wien, Germany: Springer-Verlag. pp. 79198.
Sankula, S., Braverman, M. P., and Linscombe, S. D. 1997. Glufosinate-resistant, BAR-transformed rice (Oryza sativa) and red rice (Oryza sativa) response to glufosinate alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 11: 662666.
Steckel, G. J., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Phillips, W. H. II. 1997. Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol. 11: 484488.
Van Wychen, L. V., Harvey, R. G., VanGessel, M. J., Rabaey, T. L., and Bach, D. J. 1999. Efficacy and crop response to glufosinate-based weed management in PAT-transformed sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 13: 104111.
Weber, C. R., Shibles, R. M., and Byth, D. E. 1996. Effect of plant population and row spacing on soybean development and production. Agron. J. 58: 99102.
Wells, R. J., Burton, J. W., and Kilen, T. C. 1993. Soybean growth and light interception: response to differing leaf and stem morphology. Crop Sci. 33: 520524.
Wendler, C., Barniski, M., and Wild, A. 1990. Effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis and photorespiration of C3 and C4 plants. Photosyn. Res. 24: 5561.
Wheeler, C. C., Baldwin, F. L., Talbert, R. E., and Webster, E. P. 1998. Weed control in glufosinate-tolerant rice. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 51:34.
Wild, A. and Wendler, C. 1991. Effect of glufosinate (phosphinothricin) on amino acid content, photorespiration, and photosynthesis. Pestic. Sci. 30: 422424.
Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0024, paraquat, and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33: 531536.
Yelverton, F. H. and Coble, H. D. 1991. Narrow row spacing and canopy formation reduces weed resurgence in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 169174.

Keywords

Influence of Row Spacing and Residual Herbicides on Weed Control in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

  • Justin L. Norris (a1), David R. Shaw (a1) and Charles E. Snipes (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed